Export --duties not gettin picked
Hello friends.........I am working on an export scenario with BED,SED and AED along with price in the pricing procedure...... I think I have done most of the settings correctly ..........when I create an Excise invoice with reference to a billing document the invoice gets created but none of the values that i have given to the above duties are getting picked .........everythin else getss picked(excise grp, series grp, material qty etc)....................
PLS do help me with this query .......itss very urgent ..........thnking you guys in advance
Regards
Maddy
For your better understanding ........the pricing procedure selected is as follows
PR00 ERL
JEXP EXD
JESP EXD
JEAP EXD
BASIC+EXCISE
Similar Messages
-
Include in Export does not work in APEX 3.1
I have a report with many columns. On screen I only show several columns, but on export to CSV I want to include all columns.
However, when "Show on Report" is set to No, and I want to set "Include in Export" to Yes on the "Print Attributes" tab, it does not get updated.
It only gets updated when the "Show on Report" is set to Yes.
It also seems that the "Include in Export" on the "Report Attributes" tab is not in sync with the "Include in Export" on the "Print Attributes" tab the first time you access the "Print Attributes" tab.
Question: Does "Include in Export" only works for columns which has the "Show on Report" set to Yes? If Yes, how can I achieve the above mentioned?
GuidoMarc,
After some investigations the following can be concluded:
On the Report Attributes tab, pick a column, and set "Show Column" to Yes, "Include in Export" to Yes, and no conditions.
I do not want this column to be printed, so on the Print Attributes tab, set the "Column Width" to 0.
When you run the report, you will notice that the column is not included in the export to CSV and not printed.
Setting the "Column Width" to a value greater than 0, the export to CSV works fine, but the column is also printed.
You can have a look at page 1 at at http://apex.oracle.com/pls/otn/f?p=261 (demo/ankpm)
Thanks Patrick for your solution (:REQUEST LIKE 'FLOW_EXCEL_OUTPUT_%'), it works great. The column is now not show on screen but included in the export to CSV. However, you have to set the column width to a value greater than 0.
An enhancement request for 4.0 could be to also have a property "Include in Print", and that this property and "Include in Export" are not dependent on the "Show Column" value.
Guido -
FDM export to HFM - 2nd export did not clear all data from 1st export?
Has anyone experienced exporting a replacement FDM file to HFM where the 2nd file did not contain an account that was present in the original file and that account/value in the 1st file then remained in the HFM trial balance and caused it to be out of balance? Does the replace export option not clear all the prior file data? The only unusual part of it might be that the problem account was derived using logic group script? Thanks.
Thanks Hensen - Sure, it was easy enough to fix once I deduced what the problem was - although my solution was just to use the data clear function and reload. The real question is how to prevent it from happening again and it sounds like I can't do much about it - other than trying to train the users to watch out for do-over files that have fewer accounts than the original load?? Am I wrong to think that HFM should try to fully clear all previous data from a load file if there is a replacement or at least try to validate whether or not all prior accounts have been repopulated?? There's plenty of good validation in the validation step of FDM. Why not during the export step? If this makes sense, I'll put in another "enhancement request" to support.
-
Release Strategy for Contract is not getting picked whereas it is ok for PO
Dear Experts,
I have created release strategy for PO with doc type, p.org, net value as chars and frg_ekko as class and release group as 02.
I kept NB,FO,MK and WK as char values. it is working fine for PO's whereas it is not getting picked for Contracts. we need same release strategy for PO as well as for Contract.
Kindly resolve the issue.
SatishS0004830404 wrote:
Dear Experts,
>
> I have created release strategy for PO with doc type, p.org, net value as chars and frg_ekko as class and release group as 02.
> I kept NB,FO,MK and WK as char values. it is working fine for PO's whereas it is not getting picked for Contracts. we need same release strategy for PO as well as for Contract.
>
> Kindly resolve the issue.
>
> Satish
hi,
use create other characteristic for value CEKKO-GNETW in this use the mk , wk values in value field and assign this characteristic to your class and save.
Thanking you -
Index is not getting picked even after providing hint
Hi All
The index pk_sku is not getting picked even after providing the hints when executing the query.Please kindly give me such recommendations.I am providing the information.
select * from
(select /*+ index(s pk_sku) */
to_char(t.dstamp, 'YYYYmmDDHH24MI') as sort_1,
t.client_id as CLIENT_ID ,
t.site_id as SITE_ID,
tz.time_zone_name as TIME_ZONE_NAME ,
t.owner_id as OWNER_ID,
t.sku_id as SKU_ID,
t.reason_id as ADJUST_TYPE,
to_char(t.dstamp+tz.diff/24, 'DD/mm/YYYY HH24:MI') as ADJUST_DATETIME,
t.reference_id as RECEIPT_ID,
t.batch_id as BATCH_ID,
t.update_qty as UPDATE_QTY,
t.lock_code as LOCK_CODE,
s.description as SKU_DESCRIPTION
from mv_inventory_transaction t
JOIN timezone tz ON tz.site_id = t.site_id ,
mv_sku s
where t.sku_id= s.sku_id
and t.client_id=s.client_id
and ( :client is null or :client = t.client_id)
and ( :site is null or t.site_id in (:site))
and ( :owner is null or t.owner_id in (:owner))
and t.code= 'Adjustment'
and (t.dstamp+tz.diff/24) between to_date(:dateFrom, 'DD/mm/yyyy') and to_date(:dateTo,'DD/mm/yyyy')+1
and (:sku is null or t.sku_id in (:sku))
UNION ALL
(select /*+ index(s pk_sku) */
to_char(t.dstamp, 'YYYYmmDDHH24MI') as sort_1,
t.client_id as CLIENT_ID ,
t.site_id as SITE_ID,
tz.time_zone_name as TIME_ZONE_NAME ,
t.owner_id as OWNER_ID,
t.sku_id as SKU_ID,
t.reason_id as ADJUST_TYPE,
to_char(t.dstamp+tz.diff/24, 'DD/mm/YYYY HH24:MI') as ADJUST_DATETIME,
t.reference_id as RECEIPT_ID,
t.batch_id as BATCH_ID,
t.update_qty as UPDATE_QTY,
t.lock_code as LOCK_CODE,
s.description as SKU_DESCRIPTION
from mv_inventory_transaction_arch t
JOIN timezone tz ON tz.site_id = t.site_id,
mv_sku s
where t.sku_id= s.sku_id
and t.client_id=s.client_id
and ( :client is null or :client = t.client_id)
and ( :site is null or t.site_id in (:site))
and ( :owner is null or t.owner_id in (:owner))
and t.code= 'Adjustment'
and (t.dstamp+tz.diff/24) between to_date(:dateFrom, 'DD/mm/yyyy') and to_date(:dateTo,'DD/mm/yyyy')+1
and (:sku is null or t.sku_id in (:sku))
order by sort_1,2,3,4,5
version = Release 10.1.0.5.0
SQL> sho parameter optimizer
NAME TYPE VALUE
optimizer_dynamic_sampling integer 2
optimizer_features_enable string 10.1.0.5
optimizer_index_caching integer 0
optimizer_index_cost_adj integer 100
optimizer_mode string ALL_ROWS
sho parameter db_file_multiblock_count_read
sho parameter cursor_sharing
SQL> sho parameter optimizer
NAME TYPE VALUE
optimizer_dynamic_sampling integer 2
optimizer_features_enable string 10.1.0.5
optimizer_index_caching integer 0
optimizer_index_cost_adj integer 100
optimizer_mode string ALL_ROWS
SQL> sho parameter db_file_multi
NAME TYPE VALUE
db_file_multiblock_read_count integer 16
SQL> sho parameter cursor_sharing
NAME TYPE VALUE
cursor_sharing string EXACTExplain plan
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 56 | 29736 | 345K (1)| 01:09:07 |
| 1 | SORT ORDER BY | | 56 | 29736 | 345K (1)| 01:09:07 |
| 2 | VIEW | | 56 | 29736 | 345K (1)| 01:09:07 |
| 3 | UNION-ALL | | | | | |
| 4 | NESTED LOOPS | | 2 | 984 | 29686 (1)| 00:05:57 |
| 5 | HASH JOIN | | 1 | 326 | 26870 (1)| 00:05:23 |
| 6 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIMEZONE | 4 | 88 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 7 | VIEW | MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION | 25 | 7600 | 26866 (1)| 00:05:23 |
| 8 | UNION-ALL | | | | | |
| 9 | FILTER | | | | | |
| 10 | MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION | 1 | 67 | 24327 (1)| 00:04:52 |
| 11 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX_CODE_CLIENTID_690 | 79681 | | 518 (1)| 00:00:07 |
| 12 | FILTER | | | | | |
| 13 | MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION | 24 | 2328 | 2539 (1)| 00:00:31 |
| 14 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX_CODE_646 | 9269 | | 46 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 15 | VIEW | MV_SKU | 37 | 6142 | 2816 (1)| 00:00:34 |
| 16 | UNION-ALL | | | | | |
| 17 | MAT_VIEW ACCESS FULL | MV_SKU | 335K| 10M| 2535 (1)| 00:00:31 |
| 18 | MAT_VIEW ACCESS FULL | MV_SKU | 37839 | 1699K| 280 (1)| 00:00:04 |
| 19 | NESTED LOOPS | | 54 | 26568 | 315K (1)| 01:03:10 |
| 20 | HASH JOIN | | 1 | 326 | 313K (1)| 01:02:37 |
| 21 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIMEZONE | 4 | 88 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 22 | VIEW | MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH | 576 | 171K| 313K (1)| 01:02:37 |
| 23 | UNION-ALL | | | | | |
| 24 | FILTER | | | | | |
| 25 | MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH | 1 | 72 | 19258 (1)| 00:03:52 |
| 26 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | QUI_IDX_INVTRANS_ARC1 | 36016 | | 287 (1)| 00:00:04 |
| 27 | FILTER | | | | | |
| 28 | MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH | 575 | 55200 | 293K (1)| 00:58:45 |
| 29 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | QUI_IDX_INVTRANS_ARC1 | 367K| | 3466 (1)| 00:00:42 |
| 30 | VIEW | MV_SKU | 37 | 6142 | 2816 (1)| 00:00:34 |
| 31 | UNION-ALL | | | | | |
| 32 | MAT_VIEW ACCESS FULL | MV_SKU | 335K| 10M| 2535 (1)| 00:00:31 |
| 33 | MAT_VIEW ACCESS FULL | MV_SKU | 37839 | 1699K| 280 (1)| 00:00:04 |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------when put in sql tuning advisor,It recommended with better plan using indexes
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 56 | 29736 | 340K (1)| 01:08:01 |
| 1 | SORT ORDER BY | | 56 | 29736 | 340K (1)| 01:08:01 |
| 2 | VIEW | | 56 | 29736 | 340K (1)| 01:08:01 |
| 3 | UNION-ALL | | | | | |
| 4 | NESTED LOOPS | | 2 | 848 | 26900 (1)| 00:05:23 |
| 5 | HASH JOIN | | 1 | 326 | 26898 (1)| 00:05:23 |
| 6 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIMEZONE | 4 | 88 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 7 | VIEW | MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION | 25 | 7600 | 26894 (1)| 00:05:23 |
| 8 | UNION-ALL | | | | | |
| 9 | FILTER | | | | | |
| 10 | MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION | 1 | 67 | 24352 (1)| 00:04:53 |
| 11 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX_CODE_CLIENTID_690 | 79681 | | 518 (1)| 00:00:07 |
| 12 | FILTER | | | | | |
| 13 | MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION | 24 | 2328 | 2542 (1)| 00:00:31 |
| 14 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX_CODE_646 | 9269 | | 46 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 15 | VIEW | MV_SKU | 37 | 3626 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 16 | UNION-ALL PARTITION | | | | | |
| 17 | MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | MV_SKU | 1 | 34 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 18 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | PK_SKU | 1 | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 19 | MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | MV_SKU | 1 | 46 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 20 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | PK_SKU | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 21 | NESTED LOOPS | | 54 | 22896 | 313K (1)| 01:02:38 |
| 22 | HASH JOIN | | 1 | 326 | 313K (1)| 01:02:38 |
| 23 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIMEZONE | 4 | 88 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 24 | VIEW | MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH | 576 | 171K| 313K (1)| 01:02:38 |
| 25 | UNION-ALL | | | | | |
| 26 | FILTER | | | | | |
| 27 | MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH | 1 | 72 | 19269 (1)| 00:03:52 |
| 28 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | QUI_IDX_INVTRANS_ARC1 | 36016 | | 287 (1)| 00:00:04 |
| 29 | FILTER | | | | | |
| 30 | MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH | 575 | 55200 | 293K (1)| 00:58:47 |
| 31 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | QUI_IDX_INVTRANS_ARC1 | 367K| | 3466 (1)| 00:00:42 |
| 32 | VIEW | MV_SKU | 37 | 3626 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 33 | UNION-ALL PARTITION | | | | | |
| 34 | MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | MV_SKU | 1 | 34 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 35 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | PK_SKU | 1 | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 36 | MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | MV_SKU | 1 | 46 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 37 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | PK_SKU | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------So ,after checking the recommended plan I tried to execute the query with the hints,even then it is picking up the indexes in the explain plan.So please kindly help in solving the issue
The pk_sku is the index created on client_id and sku_id columns
Thanks
GVriedelme wrote:
My experience is differernt - hints will be followed if the optimizer determines they will be beneficial and not if they will not, including my current project on 11gR2. The example below (unfortunately only 11gR1) disproves your theory, showing the index hint is followed and that the cost increases by a factor of five.
The most common cases of the optimizer apparently ignoring a hint are due to operator error, the hint is not well formed, or cannot be followed. There are a couple of documented cases where a hint will be ignored - first_rows used in CTAS is one.
Jonathan Lewis writes a lot about it on his blog showing that the optimizer always acts on a well formed hint if it is at all possible.
SQL> create table t (n number not null, c varchar2(1000));
Table created.
SQL> insert into t select 1, rpad('x',1000,'x')
2 from dual connect by level <= 50000;
50000 rows created.
SQL> create index t_ix on t (n);
Index created.
SQL> exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(user, 't', cascade => true)
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> explain plan for
2 select max(c) from t where n =1;
Explained.
SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display);
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 2966233522
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 1004 | 1574 (1)| 00:00:19 |
| 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 1004 | | |
|* 2 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| T | 50000 | 47M| 1574 (1)| 00:00:19 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
2 - filter("N"=1)
14 rows selected.
SQL> explain plan for
2 select /*+ index (t t_ix) */ max(c) from t where n = 1;
Explained.
SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display);
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 3231292748
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 1004 | 7244 (1)| 00:01:27 |
| 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 1004 | | |
| 2 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T | 50000 | 47M| 7244 (1)| 00:01:27 |
|* 3 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | T_IX | 50000 | | 98 (0)| 00:00:02 |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
3 - access("N"=1)
15 rows selected. -
Delivery document not being picked while creating shipment document
Dear All,
Issue is regarding creation of shipment document.
As i am creating shipment document in VT01N, am unable to get the delivery doc . ie., delivery document is not picked in shipment creation.
I have created a sales order, picking is completed n saved, PGI not yet been done.
Am unable to create a shipment document due to delivery document not being picked.
i/p's will be of great help.
with regards,
VijayashreeDear all,
The issue is solved.
As the Route was not picking in Sales Order so the delivery was not picked in shipment creation.
Route determination setting was not correct.
Regards,
Vijayashree -
EXP-00037: Export views not compatible with database version
kindly help with this error. We have already run catexp.sql but still that is not helping, we are still getting the same error.
we are exporting 8i db.
Export: Release 8.1.7.0.0 - Production on Thu Feb 21 14:34:25 2008
(c) Copyright 2000 Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved.
Connected to: Oracle8i Enterprise Edition Release 8.1.7.0.0 - Production
With the Partitioning option
JServer Release 8.1.7.0.0 - Production
EXP-00037: Export views not compatible with database version
EXP-00000: Export terminated unsuccessfullyDoes this apply to you?
Error: EXP 37
Text: Export views not compatible with database version
Cause: The Export utility is at a higher version than the database version
and is thereby incompatible.
Action: Use the same version of Export utility as the database. -
Error while rendering: Export file not found - what to do?
Hi,
I have been editing my video in four different premiere pro projects (as I got adviced to do from these forums because it's AVCHD clips). I have rendered these four projects and burned to four DVD's (total playtime is around 1.5hours) - which is working fine.
But then I try to import all four projects into one big master project because I want to make a blu-ray iso. The import goes fine (I import like this: File > Import > Choose project > Import entire project)
I export to encore, make the menus etc. and click "build" to start rendering. The problem is that after some time I get this error:
Blu-ray Object: "sequence-name-here/project-name-here.prproj", Export file not found
I have seen this error before while rendering some of the four individual projects - but when I saw them I simply just tried again by exporting to encore from the projects again. This seemed to work - but with the big master project I have tried several times with no luck.
Can anyone help me fix this issue? :)Yes, I got this too:
For posterity, here is what I have found that completely fixes this error, repeatedly: Clear Encore's cache. Specifically:
Close your Encore project and exit Encore
Go to the cache subdirectory named for your project (ie. if your save file is c:\projects\mymovie.ncor then go to c:\projects\mymovie\cache)
Delete the file "mlf.cache.v10"
If your Encore project contains any Premiere Pro dynamically-linked assets, start Premiere Pro and load at least one of the projects used in Encore. (I have found that this reduces memory usage -- for some reason, Premiere Pro takes up less memory than if Encore spawns the PProHeadless.exe media server to serve the same function)
Restart Encore and load your project
...and wait, patiently, for Encore to re-scan all of your assets and build up the cache again and don't touch it until it's finished. I use Process Explorer (http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb896653) to watch my disk activity and CPU to know when Encore is finished (just hover on the cyan-colored graph and you can see what program is performing the most disk activity). Once it's all finished, I save, then immediately try to build my project again. For proof of concept, my 40GB BD-50 project just built last night after getting this error yesterday afternoon.
If any of your assets are not transcoded before you begin this process, transcode them all, then start this process over again from step one. Clearing the cache does not clear the transcodes.
I hope this helps someone. I was not looking forward to completely re-authoring my project, which I've been working on (on and off) for a few months. -
Appstudio exporter does not contain a valid signature
HI I am trying to install AppStudio plugin to work with InDesign but Extension Manager is throwing the following error...
appstudio exporter does not contain a valid signature !
I have updated all software.
(I am downloading new apps in the background)
I have a CC subscriptionHi,
please click "tools"->"preferences", unselect "Allow Extension Manager to access Internet" option, and then try to install it again. -
Item in sales order not being picked into picking list
Hi Gurus,
Could you please tell me the possible reasons as why an item in the sales order which has enough stock not being picked into the picking list?
Many Thanks
ChoudryHi
Delivery creation that is selection date is controlled by the schedule line of the line item in the sales order
Try by changing the schedule lines in sales order in VA02
there you try to change the delivery date to past
It might be possible if you had enough stocks at that time
Regards
Raja -
GL Account is not getting picked by billing document
Hi Gurus,
one new GL account is set up by our FI team for a accrual condition type.
case 1:
Now when i have cancelled the previous created billing doc and trying to create again then the new GL account is not getting picked.
case 2:
Whereas when am doing the complete process flow like sales order creation, delivery and billing then the new GL account is getting picked.
Could you please let me know what would be the reason for this, why its not getting picked in first case.
Thanks,
AshiHello Preety,
Unless you see the Revenue Account Determination Analysis for the Billing document, it is very difficult to understand the reason. Please click on the Environment >> Acc.Determination Analysis >> Revenue account in the VF03 screen and find the missing assignment.
Thanks,
Suman$ -
File not getting picked with Sender Adapter
Hello Experts,
i have configured file sender adapter which is polling configured directory every 60 sec. But i could see file not getting picked up. when looked into Communication channel monitoring i could see following error:
Putting message into send queue failed, due to: com.sap.aii.af.ra.ms.api.DuplicateMessageException : Message ID aa2ec9a0-44b3-11dc-9c5b-0003baa19669(OUTBOUND) already exists in database: com.sap.sql.DuplicateKeyException: ORA-00001: unique constraint (SAPDX1DB.SYS_C00120924) violated.
is this due to adapter cache. we are on SP20.
has anybody faced this problem earlier?
Thanks in advance.
Regards
RajeevHello
actually there was small problem in file generation and hence it was failing in message mapping which is resolved. but still that problem is there when it is attempting to delete the file. hence it is not able to delete that file.
can we manually clear the send queues or should we refresh CPA cache?
Thanks
Rajeev -
Output Message Type MAHN not getting picked up in PO
Hello Experts
I have configured customized output type ZMAH (similar to MAHN) for reminder process. When I am creating PO this output type is not getting picked up automatically. If I am maintaining it manually I am able to send message for ME9F (Purchase Order) and ME91F (Reminder) successfully. Upon deremination analysis I am getting this message 502 " Output ignored (requirement 103 not fulfilled) ". Reminder are getting picked up from Purchase Value Key to PO.
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks
AnkitHello Tej
I have maintained output device but same result.
Here I am listing all parameters that I have used for configuration can anyone please take a look and let me know if I am missing anything
Steps for new Message Type for PO Reminder (ZMAH)
1. Defined new Table 026 Purchasing Output Determination: Document Type
(ii) 027 Purchasing Output Determination: Purch. Org./Vendor for EDI
2. Defined new access sequence Z515 Access Sequence for Archiving.
Following are parameters to the Access Sequence
Access Sequence Number = 1
Table = 026
Description = Purchasing Output Determination: Document Type
Requirement = 103
Exclusive = Yes (box checked)
Access Sequence Number = 2
Table = 027
Description = Purchasing Output Determination: Purch. Org./Vendor for EDI
Requirement = 103
Exclusive = Yes (box checked)
3. Maintain Output Type ZMAH for PO
General Data
Access Sequence = Z515
Access to condition (Checked)
Multiple Issuing (Checked)
Change Output
Program = SAPFM06P
FORM Routine = ENTRY_NEU
Replacement of Text Symbol
Program = SAPMM06E
FORM Routine = TEXT_SYMBOL_REPLACE
Default Values
Dispatch Time = Send Immediately (when saving application)
Transmission Medium = External Send
Communication Strategy = 0001 (E-mail Document)
Processing Routines
Transmission Medium = 5 (External Send)
Program = SAPFM06P
Form Routine = ENTRY_NEU
Form = MEDRUCK
Partner Roles
Medium = External Send
Funct = VN
Name = Vendor
4. Fine-Tuned Control: Purchase Order
Oprat. = 3
CType = ZMAH
Name = Output for Reminder
Short Text = Urging letter (expediter)/reminder
Update Print Related Data = Yes (checked)
5. Maintain Message Determination Schema: Purchase Order
Procedure RMBEF1 (Purchase Order)
Step = 101
Cntr = 3
CTyp = ZMAH
Description = Output for Reminder
Requirement = 103
6. Assign Schema to Purchase Order
Procedure RMBEF1
7. Define Partner Roles for Purchase Order
Out. = ZMAH
Med = 5 (External Send)
Funct = VN
Name = Output for Reminder
Name = Vendor
8. Test Condition Maintained in MN04 (Master Data)
Purch. Org. = 0001
Vendor = 101281
Partner Funct = VN
Medium = 5 (External Send)
Date/Time = 4 Send immediately (when saving application)
Output Device = LP01
Cover Page Text = Reminder PO number &EKKO-EBELN&
Also I have configured Purchasing Value Key, reminders are coming to PO correctly.
Thanks
Ankit -
Debit Items not getting picked while making payment with F110
HI,
When making payment with F110, items with Debit balance is not getting picked.
Example:
Payment method is assigned in the Maser data.
For a particular vendor one item has a credit balance- posting key 31.
We have posted another JV with F-02 and debited that vendor with Posting key 21. (Payment Method is not entered in the line item)
When we run F110 the credit balance is picked and debit balance is being shown in exception list.
When we got to FB02 and insert payment method in debit line item and then again run the F110 then system pickes all line items and pays the net amount.
The question is why system is not considering Payment Method from Master Data in debit line item, while in credit line item it is picking payment method from the master data.
Do I need to do any setting for it so that it should automatically take payment method from master data even in case of Debit line items.
Regards
SanjayHi All,
Thanks for your quick replies.
But it does not solve my problem.
When I am not assigning any payment method to either Debit or credit line items, system picks (payment method from Master data) for only credit line items and ignores debit line items.
But the problem is that when I assign payment method to debit line item (which is similar to what has been assigned to vendor Master Data) system groups both debit and credit line items and makes payment of only net amount.
My question was why system considered the debit line item for making payment if I manually enter payment method in the line item, if system has been designed only for out going payment. In my opinion It should have reacted similarly irrespective of whether payment method entered in the line item or not.
Regards
Sanjay -
Items not getting picked up in Return sales order
Dear all,
I am creating a return sales order with reference to a sales order.
In my delivery doc the items can be categorised into 3 types:
1- Picking done; Movement type determined
2- Picking done; Movement type not determined
3- Picking not-done; Movement type determined
In the return order, only the items of 1st type are coming. Why others not getting picked up? Can they be entered manually?
regards
SapshedDear Hrishikesh,
Thats Ok. Picking is done only for those items for which Relevant for Picking is ticked.
What I want to know is that, for items that have either their picking not done or Goods movement not determined, they are not getting automatically picked up while I create a Return order w/r to a sales order.
thanks
Sapshed
Maybe you are looking for
-
BPM error : Message pipeline PE_ADAPTER unknown XML message not found. Help
Hello All, I have done 3 steps in BPM RFC --- BPM --- RFC RECEIVE step ==> Opens SYNCH ASYNCH bridge and receives RFC request message SEND synchronous ==> to send RFC request and get the RFC response. SEND ==> Closes SYNCH ASYNCH bridge and Send's re
-
I was in the middle of updating to 7.0.3 and Itunes stopped working. Now my phone is stuck in limbo (apple logo with status bar under) My power button doesnt work (of course) How do I get it back to normal?
-
Safari 3.0.3- refresh acting funny
In previous incarnations of Safari, when I refreshed a page, I'd go back to the point on the page I was last looking at when I refreshed, in the beta however I always end up at the top of the page. Is this a common thing? Or an intentional thing? It
-
If this is your frist time seeing me this last week, I just recently upgraded from 6.5 to pro 4.1. There use to be a function to export single frames so you can use them as still images; However, I can't find the function in this version, nor have I
-
Epson 3880 - Change Black Ink Problem
I realize that this is not an Epson or Adobe forum, but I'm hoping someone here can help: I just purchased an Epson 3880 and hooked it up via USB to my 27" iMac that runs OSX Lion. When first powered up, the printer defaulted to the Photo Black ink.