Export RAW to JPG question

Hello,
Here is once again a problem that I guess has to do with color management, and I'm having a hard time figuring out my mistake.
I'm editing my RAW files in Lightroom 5 and then export them to JPG (my settings are JPEG 100% / sRGB / no sharpening or any other editing option).
Then, to compare the RAWs and the JPGs, I import those JPGs back into Lightroom to make sure I'm seeing them with the same color profile (as I guess the basic "Preview" application I'm using on my MacBook is not color managed).
My problem is that the JPGs are much brighter than the RAW files (see screenshots).
I didn't calibrate my MacBook Pro's monitor (I'm just using Mac OS' standard color-LCD preset), and I'm not expecting other users to see my pics the way I see them on my screen, I'm ok with that, but I thought that on my own computer I would not see any differences between my RAW files and the JPGs I exported from those RAW files.
I found some similar threads on that topic, but usually the problem was that the users were checking the JPGs in a tool that was not color managed, and so it would not match what they saw in Lightroom, but since I do check my exported JPGs in Lightroom, I assumed they would be represented within the same color space, with no noticeable differences...
I'd appreciate if someone could tell me what I'm doing wrong!
Thank you!

To tell you the truth, a client asking for a 3MB JPG is a very meaningless thing to do.
Any time you are changing the number of pixels on a side, you are changing the image quality. Any time you are forcing the photo to be a certain size in MB other than the maximum, you are accepting a certain reduction in image quality. Which is worse? It all depends on the original, and how much change you are asking for.
So, that's my answer ... IT ALL DEPENDS.

Similar Messages

  • IPhoto '08 loses exif data when exporting RAW to JPG

    I'm using a Canon 40D shooting only RAW. I just recently noticed that when I export to JPG, iPhoto loses quite a bit of important EXIF data, including, aperture info.
    Is this a known issue, or is it something unique to my system?

    I guess I misworded it. I understand that the info doesn't go away or come back. Either there's a problem in both Finder and flickr (I've uploaded the file to flickr.com) where neither finds the info in the jpeg or there's a problem in the way iPhoto writes the EXIF data to the file.
    Today, I downloaded EXIFViewer for an alternate look at the EXIF fields and the aperture data is there according to EXIFViewer. So, now I think the bug may be with flickr. Can't really call it a bug in Finder, since the expected functionality for finder is not to get "aperture info", but "More info."
    In any case, these are the fields in the More Info:
    |RAW:Name_|_RAW:Value_|_JPEG:Name_|_JPEG:Value|
    |Dimensions|2586x3892|Dimensions|2586x3892|
    |Device make|Canon|Device make|Canon|
    |Color space|RGB|Color space|RGB|
    |Profile name|Adobe RGB (1998)|Profile name|Generic RGB Profile|
    |Focal Length|44|Focal Length|44|
    |Alpha channel|0|Alpha channel|0|
    |Red eye|0|Red eye|0|
    |FNumber|4|
    |Exposure|1/60|Exposure|1/60|
    |Last opened|Monday, May 19, 2008 6:31 PM|Last opened|Today, 9:31am|
    And the meta info on flickr is here:
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/carloscervantes/2536040124/meta/
    Again, no aperture data in either flickr or Finder.

  • Exporting RAW to JPG Does Not Show JPG After Export

    When I export a RAW file that I want to be changed to JPG, the file does not show up in my Lightroom folder until I synchronize the folder that I exported to.  What LR setting is needed so that the exported JPG file will show automatically?

    In the Export Location area of the export dialog is a checkbox for Add to this Catalog if you have a newer version of LR.

  • LR4 - Anyone notice slower export times - RAW to JPG?

    I read through the "Lightroom 4 is slow" thread - very good reading. I have noticed many of the same issues & hope Adobe is paying attention to that thread!
    No one mentioned a slowdown in exporting RAW files to JPG. My average time for exporting Canon 7D CR2 files to full sized 300dpi JPGs in LR 3 is about 5.3 seconds per file. The same exports in LR 4 are about 8 seconds per file.
    I can learn to live with this increased exporting time. I'm curious as to whether anyone else is experiencing this.

    Yes.  For me, Canon G12 & 40D RAW files are taking twice as long to export under LR4 than under 3.6 - 16 secs vs 8 secs after the same processing.  But I am also seeing the same general latency problems identified in other threads here.  I've reverted back to 3.6 after trying every possible workaround posted so far - LR4 is unusable for me.
    Dave

  • Question about RAW to JPG file sizes

    Hello all, I have a question/concern in reference to file size changes when converting from RAW to JPG formats in PSE6. I've recently purchased a CANON 50D, and have started shooting in RAW format (actually RAW2+JPG). I have the CAMERA RAW 5.2 plugin and my workflow process is something akin to this:
    1. Separate all RAW and JPG images into their respective folders.
    2. Open the RAW folder in BRIDGE, and then open up a CR2 file. CR2 file is approx 15MB at this point, as reported in Finder.
    3. Perform various corrections in ACR52 to the file, then do as SAVE AS to a DNG file.
    4. Next step is to OPEN IMAGE, bringing it up in PSE6.
    5. Make any necessary corrections to the picture, and then do a SAVE AS to a new file name and folder, selecting JPG format.
    6. Selection MAX QUALITY from subsequent dialogue box, and SAVE.
    When the file is saved, its now down to a mere 2.1 or 2.2MB, and when viewing its properties (vs. the same file that came from camera in JPG format), its down from a 44x66" format, to somewhere around 4x6" and 240dpi.
    I've been doing some reading on this over the weekend, but cant explain away the severe loss in file size, and whether this is right, or if I'm doing something wrong in the process.
    Appreciate any advice or suggestions to help improve my work processes, and ultimately the final photos!

    Regarding your file size questions, have a look at this thread and see if it answers some of your questions:
    http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/741532/0
    > When the file is saved, its now down to a mere 2.1 or 2.2MB, and when viewing its properties (vs. the same file that came from camera in JPG format), its down from a 44x66" format, to somewhere around 4x6" and 240dpi.
    Dimensions and resolution are related and multiple combinations can be produced from the same number of pixels. For example, your 50D at maximum image size produces 4,752 by 3,168 pixels. This full-size image could be printed at:
    - 19.8 x 13.2 inches at 240 PPI
    - 47.52 x 31.68 inches at 100 PPI
    - 7.92 x 5.28 inches at 600 PPI
    As you can maybe see, talking about dimensions and resolution doesn't make much sense until you are ready to consider printing. Note also that I used "PPI" or Pixels Per Inch since this is the slightly more correct terminology. DPI or "Dots Per Inch" is usually a reference to how a printer lays down the ink drops onto the paper. Many printers actually put more "dots" on the paper than there are pixels. Many people and companies use DPI when they mean PPI.
    Now in your case you are apparently starting with an SRAW2 raw file. SRAW2 files from the 50D have a reduced number of pixels and are 2,276 pixels wide by 1,584 pixels high. At 240 PPI this would allow you to print the image at 9.9 by 6.6 inches. If you are ending up with something smaller than that, it means you have either re-sampled the image (changed the image so the same image is displayed with fewer pixels) or you have cropped the image.
    Hope that helps.

  • Original size Raw to JPG export not exporting correct size

    I'm having a problem with the export of RAW to JPG at original size. I have raw images of 4941 × 3295 (125mb), when I export selecting "JPEG-origional" size I get resulting jpg's of 800 x 533 (95kb) 
    If I select JPEG-50% of original size I get correctly exported images of 2471 × 1648 (589kb)
    Why would the original size export not work?

    Have you checked the "JPEG original size" preset? Select the preset on export, then switch to "Edit" and see, what is selected. Sometimes this preset is redefined to a smaller size.
    When you edit the preset, the "Size To" pop-up should be set to "Original size". If it is not, set it back.
    Regards
    Léonie

  • I have updated to LR 5.7 today, apparently now I cannot export any longer from RAW to jpg, receive message : export could not be performed, access to undefined global: newGrainSeed(1). Can anyone help me out to resolve this ?

    When updating my LightRoom to version 5.7, exporting from RAW to jpg has become impossible. I receive message : access to undefined global:newGrainSeed(1).
    Anyone experienced the same ? How can I solve this ?

    new Lightroom 5.4 export jpeg error?

  • RAW vs JPG quality question

    Just got Lightroom and am now for the first time taking images in RAW format. I am using a Canon SLR as well as a Panasonic P&S both shooting in JPG and RAW. The Canon RAW images have an extension of .CR2 and the Panasonic has an extension of .RW2..
    Okay with that out of the way, I'm going through my images and notice that the RAW images don't look nearly as nice as the JPG images. As I understand it, RAW has all of the information from the picture taken and gives more flexibility with adjustments. But how is it that the two images side by side look so different? I like the look of the JPG images most of the time.. They have better color quality and the lighting seems to be more accurate to what was shot. Some even seem to have a higher level of sharpness where the RAW images almost look like they could be slightly out of focus. I've tried to get the RAW and JPG images to look the same to see if there is a specific difference (see if contrast is always x lower or x higher etc... ) but can't seem to get a RAW image to look like what was actually shot.
    Any input on working with RAW images or experience that would help me out here?
    Much appreciated!
    Nathan

    The main “quality” thing you’ll probably see different your camera’s raw conversion (to JPGs) and Adobe’s is that there is no default luminance noise-reduction so there will be grain you can see and that the sharpening is more subtle.
    You can adjust both the noise-reduction and sharpening to taste, just don’t overdo it.  When I look at a camera JPG I typically see too much noise reduction which has removed too much fine detail, and sharpening halos along edges, both of which I dislike, now that I’ve worked with raws for so long.
    Here is the first part of a three-part tutorial about the three types of sharpening, capture, creative, output, that you can do to raw files in Lightroom.  The links to the other two parts are at the bottom of part one:
    http://laurashoe.com/2011/08/21/sharpening-in-lightroom-part-one-overview-and-capture-shar pening/
    You should also be doing your capture and creative sharpening with the zoom set to 100% or 1:1.  The resampling algorithim used to show smaller-than-100%-zoom views in Lightroom Develop will give inaccurate sharpening preview results, so what you think you’re doing will be different than what is actually visible in the output you produce with LR, unless you use 1:1.

  • Exporting photo as "Original" question

    I shoot RAW (Canon 7D) and import my RAW files in LR, make my edits, export as JPG and also, just incase I want to go back and tweak my edits I export the file as "orginal" which if I understand it correctly, LR makes a copy of my .cr2 file. I compared the original CR2 file to the copy LR makes and see a slight color difference but that's all.
    Is it safe to delete the original CR2 files from my camer and keep the "original" copy the LR makes when I export?

    This is my original workflow:
    Export CR2 files from Camera via memory card reader
    Create folder structure with date and then subfolder named RAW that holds the CR2 files
    Open Geosetter and keyword photos as well as geotag (I know LR4 does this, however, geosetter allows me to keyword much easier as well as geotag)
    Import CR2 files into LR
    Edit photos
    Export photos as JPG
    Export photos as DNG (to keep edits)
    Create a subfolder named DNG to keep as well as the original downloaded CR2 files from the camera
    This process is fine with me and works, however, keeping the DNG and the CR2 files really takes up a lot of space; I don't keep my LR catalog for very long as I don't find it useful for viewing, sorting photos, I much prefer ZoomBrowser for that or Windows Photo Viewer
    The workflow I originally inquired on in my first post:
    Export CR2 files from Camera via memory card reader
    Create folder structure with date and then subfolder named RAW that holds the CR2 files
    Open Geosetter and keyword photos as well as geotag (I know LR4 does this, however, geosetter allows me to keyword much easier as well as geotag)
    Import CR2 files into LR
    Edit photos
    Export photos as JPG
    Export photos as "original" (to keep edits) which creates a .cr2 file (I'm guessing a copy- hopefully a 1:1 copy) and a sidecar file that contains the edits
    My question was regarding step 7 in this new workflow, my concern is that the LR copy of the .cr2 file is actually EXACTLY the same as the original .CR2 file from my camera.
    This process may not work for some, but it does for me. I'm also considering, exporting the edits as "original", discarding the copied .cr2 files and keeping the sidecar files. I tried that and it seems to work well.

  • Lost metadata in file after attempt to Save RAW As JPG in PS CS3

    Someone in other place in this Forum advised me that this will be probably more appropriate place to ask these questions, so I will give it a go. Below is a copy of my post on PS Windows thread (well, two posts really edited into one):
    Hi,
    I have just found out that after I open RAW pictures from my Canon 5D (but same happens with pictures from Canon 10D) in PS and than try to save them as JPGs, I loose majority of my metadata from the files (after right click on filename in. I can still Windows Explorer and clicking Properties or simply adding additional columns in Win XP Windows Explorer detailed view.
    So same picture, without any editing at all, just opened as RAW file (which it is a CR2 or CRW file in Canons), and then saved as JPG, suddenly does not show the date of picture taken, focal length or exposure time are all gone. Does not matter if I try Properties in Win Explorer or say Properties in MS Office Picture Manager.
    Was trying to look for any setting in PS that would set the ability to save or abandon saving of this type of information in JPG file but could not find anything of this kind.
    What is interesting I went back to my pictures I have saved from RAW to JPG using same PS years ago, and I this was not a problem. Everything was saving OK.
    So in summary:
    1. This would not be a problem related to camera (it is unlikely that same problem would occur on two different models at the same time - even though both are Canons)
    2. It must be a way to force the Photoshop to do that, I f I was able to do it successfully, almost without knowing, before.
    Therefore, I would think that either:
    1. There is some set of defaults somewhere in PS that I have accidently turned off causing my PS not to save this metadata properly or in full, or
    2. That it came as some kind of bug with some of the updates to PS CS3 that I was getting over last year from Adobe.
    Has any one else encountered similar problem? If yes, what did you do to resolve this issue?
    I will be very grateful for any help, as I am not a frequent user of Adobe Photoshop and may just not be very familiar with the part that regulates that type of issues.
    And I do not use the Save for Web option.
    I just used (in PS CS3 running on Win XP Professional with SP3) the Save As from File menu.
    What is also strange is that if I use File - Open command and get the first window with Open dialog box, where you have some basic options for opening/converting RAW format pictures (this window does not come up when I open JPG files) and I use existing there button to Save (which does not actually allow to do any editing of the picture before such way of saving) all Camera Properties, or that metadata, is actually saved into the newly created JPG quite correctly.
    However if I use button Open in that conversion dialog box, and than save already opened RAW file as JPG, the majority of that data is gone (date picture taken, exposure time, aperture, focal length, exposure compensation steps etc).
    I can see that RAW file has all this in the sections called EXIF and XMP (under File - File Information) but Save As does not add this info in the JPG files for some reason.

    No, not really, because I ma not sure what it is for.
    I just used (in PS CS3 running on Win XP Proffessional) the Save As from File menu.
    What is also strange is that if I use Open command and get the first window with Open dialog box, where you have some basic options for opening/converting RAW format pictures (this window does not come up when I open JPG files) and I use existing there option to Save (which does not actually allow to do any editing of the picture before such way of saving) the all Camera Properties, or that metadata is actually saved into the newly created JPG.However if i use button Open in that conversion dialog box, and than save as JPG, the majority of that dtata is gone (date picture taken, exposure time, aperture, focal lenght, exposure compensation steps etc).
    I can see that RAW file has all this in the sections called EXIF and XMP (under File - File Information) but Save As does not add this info in the JPG files for some reason.

  • Working with Raw Files: Workflow question

    I am seriously a novice and need some advice. I have a Nikon D40x and I'm using Aperture software. I am shooting in raw (nef)+ jpg. I have uploaded the pics via aperture. When I import, a pop-up import menu says RAW + JPEG PAIRS: BOTH (JPG as master).
    No problem here. Now I want to do some "fancy editing" but all I see is the jpg copy. How to I get to the raw (nef) file? And once I do and make changes, do I need to convert it to something else? HOW?
    Any and all advice welcome! (Preferably in layman's terms, though. I'm already overwhelmed by all of the techie jargon).

    My advice:
    Stop wasting your time doing jpg and nefs - just do nefs.
    You also need to read the introduction to Aperture and possibly the Aperture manual if you want to get competent in the use of Aperture. Some of the principles and concepts need to be understood before you can use Aperture effectively - forget about "fancy" - you need "fundamentals" first. Might sound like I"m telling you to suck eggs, but this understanding is really important. Who knows - reading the manual might even answer the question you just asked...
    Regards,
    Calx

  • Exporting RAW masters of RAW-JPEG Pairs

    Is there any way to export only the RAW master of a RAW-JPEG pair?  I always shoot both RAW and JPEG.  In my workflow, I first import into Aperture the JPEG's.  I then group into stacks, choose my stack picks, and finally rate all my stack picks.  I then will go back and only import those RAW files which match my stack picks.  Occasionally, I would like to edit my RAW files outside of Aperture using Capture NX2 and would like to export only those RAW files.  Exporting a "version" only allows to export a JPEG/TIFF or other file.  Exporting "masters" exports both master files, the JPEG and the RAW.  Is there a way to only export the RAW master? 
    Thanks for your advice.

    I'm frustating about how Aperture give RAW+jpg pairs and once imported is not easy to select one of the two files depending on the case. I read recently a good solution, you can import Both as masters(RAW and JPG) and select AutoStack(⌥⌘A)
    with a short time span (0:02) and Aperture will import the two masters of each photo, and later you'll be free to use one of them. And you can reject manually all the RAWs that you don't want to store.

  • Exporting RAW - Aperture 2

    Anyone know how I can export my RAW files from Aperture? The only options I have are to export either in JPG or TIFF/PSD. I'd to export my 18MB RAW files as the same size (18MB) and not in TIFF because the TIFF file would be over 30MB.
    Please let me know if you have any suggestions.
    Thanks!

    Select Export Masters, rather than Export Version.

  • Exporting Raw to PS

    Hi,
    I've update both Apple & Adobe Photoshop CS2 support file on my iMac, and vertified that both Aperture & Photoshop reads my camera's raw files.
    I'm importing all my pictures in Aperture, how do i export raw image to photoshop, when I Control-Click a picture in aperture and select Photoshop the image is transalated as '.psd'. The only way I can transfer raw image is export to desktop and then open the picture from photoshop.
    I wanted to export raw to photoshop to edit it and get the final fixed version back in aperture, the way i used to do with '.jpg' files.
    Thanks
    Regards
    Sajid
    iMac 20 Intel Core 2 Duo   Mac OS X (10.4.8)   2.1GHz, 2 GB

    I'm importing all my pictures in Aperture, how do i export raw image to photoshop, when I Control-Click a picture in aperture and select Photoshop the image is transalated as '.psd'.< </div>
    I just use Export Master and then pop the raw file open in PS. I do no understand the need for an Automator-ized hot folder to do this for you.
    Personal Workflow note: I have no need to bring the image back into Aperture. I don't use Aperture to track versions from external editors. I find this needlessly clutters Aperture and my Phtoshop versions are almost always job-specific. I keep them in a client-specific folder, not in Aperture. But that's just how we work at my shop.
    bogiesan

  • Exporting RAW to JPEG, losing EXIF data

    Hi,
    When I am exporting a RAW image from Aperture to a JPEG image I'm losing metadata. Specifically: Lens, Serial #, Flash exposure and focus data. I always select 100% JPEG with the "include metadata" checked.
    Any suggestions or is this a bug?

    I know this is an old thread, but I have the same problem and am hoping perhaps to get some new feedback.  I also have used all the same settings,
    the best quality settings that I can do on export, but the quality I get when I convert to JPG is very poor. I do save at 100% because I want to send some of my images to stock agencies that want JPGs but at the very best possible quality.  I have experimented in changing the resolution to 300, resizing to 18MP (which is the native size from my camera (Canon 7D), leaving the resizing box unchecked, and tried all all levels and types of sharpening, and none of these settings makes any improvement.  I honestly do not think this is an issue of color calibration.  The images that I get when I convert from RAW to JPG are are very poor quality, but not so much noise as they appear pixelated.  I am going to try to attach a screen capture of a RAW image and a JPG that has been converted.  Realize there is a bit of loss of quality in both of these images as they were done by the print screen function, then saved as BMP and then JPG..But doing it this way actually produced a much better quality image than exporting the RAW file to JPG in LR3. Both of these images were saved at 100%
    The image at the top is a small segment of the RAW capture at 100% and the bottom one is a segment of the same area of the exported JPG at 100% Note the writing and how it is very pixelated. I think you would agree that it is quite a deterioration in quality.  Any suggestions you have would be greatly appreciated.
    Thank you.
    Message was edited by: wyeaton
    I'm sorry that the images do not appear to be showing up on the thread.  They do show up when I uploaded them and when I edit them, but I don't see them once I do the update.  Any suggestions there would be appreciated as well.
    Thanks.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Changing of Material Valuation Classes

    Currently changing of material valuation classes in standard SAP can be achieved if :     1.   If valuated stocks already exist, you can change the valuation class         only as follows:         a)  Post the stocks of the material to an interim acc

  • How do I set the column content to automatic break lines

    Hello Guys, I have a problem with the column width and the column content of a standard report. Within the report are hugh entries which aren't interrupted by an space character. I set my column width to a special value by usingen "css style: display

  • Programmatically: Support content types in the gallery and for content types associated with a document library

    Hi there, Help appreciated in programmatically 'Supporting content types in the gallery and for content types associated with a document library'. Any resources/references or source is greatly appreciated. Regards,

  • Excise register balance update

    Sir,      Our client uses FI JV for excise duty utilization instead of standard transaction J2IUN. As a result the balance in Ex registers RG23A/C part 2 is showing excess amount than actual. Part 1 register is updated through J1I5. How to correct ba

  • Agent installation

    OS: AIX 5.2 Oracle DB Version: 10.1.0.4.0 CD Pack: Oracle EM 10g Grid Control Release 1 Hello All, Our Oracle DB 10.1.0.4.0 is running on AIX 5.2. Now I have request to install AGENT on this box from Oracle EM 10g Grid Control Release 1 cd pack. Is t