Export simplified image

I like the new feature which allows you to export simplified images of graphs as an .emf, but I was wondering if it is possible to export these images programmtically, or if it must be done manually in edit mode.
Thanks.

You can only export the simplified image manually there is not a programatic interface.
If you really needed to you may be able to use this example to fire all the mouse events to save the image, but I am not sure if it is worth it.
How to Programmatically Select and Highlight Array Element

Similar Messages

  • Export Simplified Image, with color markers

    Hi,
    I have a few graphs that i'd like in a report, they need to look neat and will get resized along the way. So i need to export them as vector based graphics (.eps or .emf), i have been using Export Simplified Image (Object Shortcut Menu -> Data Operations ->Export Simplified Image). For most plots this has worked fine.
    Problem comes when i make plot with just markers no lines, when i do the export the marker points are always black. I would like to show the differences between some data sets using colour not just marker shape. When i do the same plot but with lines and markers, then both the lines and markers come out in color. Exporting to .eps and and .emf has identical results.
    An example is attached, with the two plots (with lines and without). I am using LabView 8.0 on WinXP could it be a version thing? Anyone willing to test on other versions?
    Thanks
    Tim (LabRat1)
    Attachments:
    ExportTest.vi ‏126 KB

    Hi Topher,
    How are you doing this?  Are you going to right-click>>Export Simplified Image.  I have done this with the code attached on the forum above and this works fine for me using 8.6.1f1.  You could try installing the patch for 8.6.1 if you haven't already to ensure we are on the same version.  This is available at  http://joule.ni.com/nidu/cds/view/p/lang/en/id/1276 although it should not fix anything to do with this.  Does this also not work by using the property node as described in the KB at http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/5AE4ADCBB65A6D8F86256FBF007A1AC1?OpenDocument
    Regards,
    James Mc
    ========
    CLA and cRIO Fanatic
    wiresmithtech.com/blog

  • XY graph export simplified image emf bug

    Hi,
    I have a problem with exporting a XY graph to a simplified image (Enhanced metafile .emf or Encapsulated postscript .eps).
    Or using the print front panel option / method.
    When you run the example vi (XY graph bug - LabVIEW 2013 SP1.vi), right click the XY graph and choose the option "Export Simplified Image...", some of the plots are inverted when you choose .emf or .eps in the options menu (see "Export Simplified Image options.png").
      -->   
    When you choose Bitmap it works fine.
    Any ideas?
    Or is it a bug in LabVIEW 2013?
    BJK
    Attachments:
    XY graph bug - LabVIEW 2013 SP1.vi ‏27 KB
    Export Simplified Image options.png ‏23 KB
    XY graph export results.zip ‏26 KB

    Hi,
    Thank you for your answer.
    Actually I wanted to use the option "Automatically print front panel every time VI completes execution" or the "Print.Panel to Printer" method".
    But when I do that I have the same problem.
    Any workaround for that?
    BJK
    Attachments:
    Print options.png ‏38 KB

  • Export simplified image bug report

    The attached XY Graph has two plots represented in semilog scale (linear X scale, logarithmic Y scale).
    The two axes are set to not autoscale and I chose Y to start a 1. There are values of Y equal to zero in the plots.
    When right-clicking the graph and selecting Export>>Export Simplified Image... and then selecting the following options:
    pasting the image into another software (e.g. Power Point) results in this:
    Notice that the zero bins are now set to infinity...
    No such problem occur when setting the Y scale to linear or exporting the image as BMP.
    But of course none of these are satisfactory solutions to this bug, which seems related to what is described in this recent thread:
    http://forums.ni.com/t5/forums/replypage/board-id/170/message-id/877895
    Tested in LV 2013 SP1
    Attachments:
    Export Simplified Image Bug Example.vi ‏9 KB

    You got 0 in the data.
    Log 0 => inf.
    a work around:
    replace 0 with NaN.
    Then you get:
    George Zou
    http://webspace.webring.com/people/og/gtoolbox

  • Is there a programmat​ical equivalent to Export Simplified Image?

    Is there a programmatical equivalent to Export Simplified Image?
    Doing what is in the image programmatically?
    R
    Message Edited by JoeLabView on 10-07-2008 01:36 PM
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.
    Attachments:
    ExportSimplifiedImage.PNG ‏8 KB

    Thanks Saverio,
    I knew about the Get Image method, but I never thought of the but depth set to 1 for monochrome.   You must have read my mind about this one because it's another detail I had omitted..
    This is exactly what I was looking for.
    Thanks!
    R

  • Help with exporting and image size or boundaries?

    I am trying to slide the cat into the scene a little at a time foir an animation project I am working on. However, when I export the image the back ground of the image expands with a checkered back ground( showing here in white) and shows the whole cat.
    How do I just show a little of the cat on the image at a time when exporting. I am trying to give the impression that the cat is walking into the room. I do not want to have to cut the cat up.
    I would be thankful for any suggestions.

    Provide the name of the program you are using so a Moderator may move this message to the correct program forum
    This Cloud forum is not about help with program problems... a program would be Photoshop or Lighroom or Muse or ???

  • When exporting files to web pages Aperture keeping losing files, so for instance, if I choose to export 600 images to a new web page, it might do 524 images but not the full 600. I've tried resetting Aperture, it's the latest version etc etc. Help please!

    If anyone can help me with this I would be seriously grateful.
    When exporting mutliple files to web pages Aperture keeping losing files, so for instance, if I choose to export 600 images to a new web page, it might make 524 pages but not the full 600. I've tried resetting Aperture and its persmission and am using the latest version of 3.
    I have 3600 images which I need to upload as sublfolders, each with their own URL and at the moment Aperture is dropping of anything from 1 to 90 images.
    This is critical as people need to see each and every on of these images online. So if a file has 600 photos in it, Aperture should make a URL with 600 full image pages. And this is what it's not doing. On small files, say 30 or so it seems to work well, it's when it gets to more than that the problem starts.
    I've used Aperture in the past under previous versions and not had this problem.
    Any help would be great.
    Thanks.
    Bob.

    Hi Jack,
    Thanks for responding (as it seems as though no one else has been able to provide any insight as of yet)! Not sure if you saw my recent post, but the version of Aperture on the 2008 MacBook has been upgraded to 3.1.2 (not sure how; I bought it in 2009, but only have OS X 10.5.8... which apparently can't house 3.1.2 of Aperture, but hey, like many other anomalies i'm encountering, I'm no longer surprised!). I am unable to upgrade it any further, as it warns me that my OS X does not fit the requirements. I exported the projects as libraries; however, like I posted before, apparently these are from too old of a version for the new Aperture (3.3.1) to handle and import.
    It's getting to the point where I'd almost pay to upgrade the OS X on my previous MacBook (10.5.8) to something newer in order to THEN update Aperture to a newer version; however, my previous MacBook simply cannot handle this (the specs are awful -- hence my decision to save up and upgrade to the newest MBP with Retina).
    I've spent hours upon hours transferring files, libraries as projects, previews, versions, even masters (though, apparently some of them aren't accessible?) with no luck. I've rebuilt the library and reprocessed everything. And this is all after having to return one MBP already since Aperture 3.3.1 is glitch-y as it is, and froze everything for having a "managed library". So, now that I know that I have to deal with a referenced library in Aperture... I just need to actually transfer my previous library to my new one (hopefully WITH adjustments since these are years worth of photos and work).
    Again, any help is appreciated. I've lost enough sleep, time, and vision health over this at this point.
    Also, I know Migration Assistant is an option, I was told that it wouldn't work properly anyway because of the different operating systems, and the potential for problems.

  • I still use Aperture 2.1.4.  I need to export an image file with a CMYK profile.  Whereas a generic CMYK profile is listed in ColorSync Utility, it does not appear on the list of profiles in the edit portion of the export preset dialogue.  Help?

    I still use Aperture 2.1.4.  I need to export an image file with a CMYK profile.  Whereas a generic CMYK profile is listed in ColorSync Utility, it does not appear on the list of profiles in the edit portion of the export preset dialogue.  Help?  Is there some way to add the CMYK profile to the list of choices that are available in the export preset dialogue such that I can choose it?

    leonieDF
    Thanks for your response.  My profiles are located within color sync utility as you can see here:   
    These profiles do not respond to clicking and dragging.  Since they are all in one place, more or less, I'm reluctant to make further attempts to relocate them.  Accessing the CMYK profile is the first difficult experience I've encountered with this arrangement.  I have never needed the CMYK profile until recently, and that need has now past.  However, it remains a mystery to me as to why it does not appear with all the others on the menu of export choices in Aperture 2, or on the menu of profile assignment choices in the Preview application (where again all the other profiles are listed as choices).  I'm beginning to think my current set up will permit me to view an image that was created in CMYK space, but does not easily assign, or convert to that space.  I don't face these restrictions with all the others, so it remains a curious circumstance for me.  I anticipate upgrading my computer and software in the near future which might alleviate this issue altogether.  Again, many thanks for your attention to this matter.  The reach of this community is astounding.

  • Flash CC crashes every time I try to export an image

    I just downloaded the free trial of Flash CC because I wanted to test it out as a drawing program. I just finished an illustration and want to export it as a .JPEG, but every time I try, Flash crashes! I tried creating a new file and just exporting an image of a small circle, and even that caused the program to crash.
    I don't want to have wasted a free trial and be unable to use or access these images after the trial runs out, simply because I cannot export them into image files.
    Any help would be wonderful, thanks.
    (I am using a desktop Mac, if that makes any difference)

    Are you on Mac OSX 10.6? Flash Pro CC is not supported on Mac 10.6 and this crash is one of the known issues on Mac 10.6.
    System requirements for Flash Pro CC - http://www.adobe.com/in/products/flash/tech-specs.html

  • How to export antialiased images of PDF pages?

    Hello all:
    I recently upgraded to Acrobat XI, and I am surprised to see that you STILL cannot export (or Save As) PDF pages to images that are ANTIALIASED!? Does anyone have a simple answer for this that doesn't involve a workflow of more than 5 steps? This is so headslappingly obvious a need that I'm at a loss for what Adobe's engineers are thinking when programming the Save As Image functions...
    I posted this question all the way back in 2009 (see post at http://forums.adobe.com/message/2411677#2411677), and still the answer is the same: when Acrobat saves pages as TIF or JPEG files, they are ALIASED. Who would want that? Who?! WHY?
    It's simply exasperating that Adobe does not include a tiny, little check box that says "Antialiased" in the "Save As TIF / JPEG Settings" dialog box where you set all kinds of parameters like resolution and colorspace....If the exporting process would just include antialiasing, you could set the resolution you desire and YOU'RE DONE.
    But, as far as I can tell, you still have to perform some kind of gymnastic routine like:
    Open the PDF and select all the desired page thumbnails to export.
    Right-click and choose Extract Pages. Make sure to check "Extract Pages as Separate Files."
    Export all the separate PDFs for each desired page into a folder somewhere.
    Open Photoshop and start recording an Action.
    Open one of the PDFs and specify the desired resolution.
    Save it in a desired location in an image file of your choice (TIF/JPEG).
    Stop recording the Action.
    Delete the resulting image you made of the test PDF page to avoid an overwriting error later when running the batch (or check box to overwrite in batch dialog).
    Run the Action in Batch mode on the entire folder of separate PDF pages.
    This is preposterous.
    Adobe, please get the simple things right for everyday low-level users before adding feature bloat to Acrobat with each passing version. Please.

    Hi Dave: Good points about reducing feature bloat and installer footprint taking priority for most users...
    However, if, as you say:
    Acrobat and Adobe Reader are developed as a standalone product family....
    Ultimately, since you can get an AA bitmap of a PDF file by just opening it in Photoshop etc., there is very little commercial demand for Adobe to include that feature in Acrobat.
    then, those people who do not have Photoshop (because AA is designed to be standalone, right?) cannot access antialiasing in exporting PDF images at all! Your point is exactly my point.
    If there is so little demand, then why include Export to Image functionality at all? Just eliminate it completely to save installer footprint space!....But, then, I'm sure you realize people would complain about that immediately, no? So, again, why include it at all when it's only able to export aliased images which virtually nobody is going to want? That's very passive-aggressive toward's Adobe's users. Nobody really benefits from half-baked features only begrudgingly included in software to placate the vocal minority of users who would otherwise miss it. I realize this isn't a huge issue for most users, but I think this points to a larger mentality within Adobe and the software industry in general....
    There is a huge number of people working in corporations that own legacy versions of AA who have not and will not likely subscribe to Creative Cloud! (e.g.: The 100-person architecture/engineering firm I worked at for 10 years had one copy of Photoshop on a community graphics workstation and made everyone use a sign-up sheet to access it.)
    Also, it's nice in theory that PDFs are supposed to be a print format. But, many many times, AA users have to make images (for PowerPoint, blogs, client portals etc.) from PDFs that they did not originally create and do not have the source files to recreate or export as images from their originating software. PDF export to images from Acrobat is their only choice without access to Photoshop.
    And, if AA is truly designed to be a stand-alone product, untethered from the capabilities of the entire suite of functionality across Creative Cloud apps, then a modular plug-in approach to controlling feature bloat would be more appropriate, no?
    For example, AutoCAD is a giant, sprawling application for technical drawing. And AutoDesk has recognized over the years that AutoCAD is used by many industries, each with special needs unneccesary to other industries' user base. So, they've created add-on packs of plug-ins that transform vanilla AutoCAD into AutoCAD for Architecture, Civil Engineering, Electrical Engineering, Bridge Design, Home Building, etc....see where I'm going?
    And Adobe has a far larger installed user base for Acrobat than AutoDesk does for AutoCAD! How about plugins like AA for Technical Publishing, AA for 3D modeling, AA for Presentations?...

  • How to hide the file name (the bizarre number assigned by the camera) when exporting an image version in aperture from an album. Pl understand I want to keep the file name in the project library version.

    how to hide the file name (the bizarre number assigned by the camera) when exporting an image version in aperture from an album. Pl understand I want to keep the file name in the project library version.

    Within Aperture you have Images, which are constructed on-the-fly from two files (the Master and the Version).  You get an image-format file _only_ when you export an Image.  You select the file name (usually a scheme) when you create an image-format file (that is, when you export).  Look under "Aperture→Presets→File Naming" for built-in Presets.  You can, of course, create your own or customize any provided.
    The Preset is applied to only the file newly created by your "export" command.  It is not applied to the Image in Aperture (unless you rename your Versions or your Masters).

  • Orgchart export to image: special characters issue

    Hello,
    Using Orgchart Accelerated 2.01.
    We have an issue when exporting to image.  The issue happens when org unit name or attributes contains some special characters like é or ë (common in French).  In the jpg export, these characters are being replaced by some square characters.  In the preview and in the application, everything is displaying just fine.
    This doesn't happen for ppt export (pdf export still not functionning)
    Thanks,
    Laurent

    HI Laurent,
    This is quite unusual. As far as I am aware the OrgChart Accelerated solution only supports English at present. However, you should raise an OSS message via Service Marketplace as I would expect it to export these characters okay.
    Many thanks,
    Luke

  • How to export all images as 4x6?

    Okay, one of the things I absolutely love about Aperture is the ability to export many different versions for different purposes. As a wedding photographer, there are many different purposes to export for.
    Here's the glitch that I'm running into though. We've now started only giving DVD images to our clients sized as 4 x 6s at 300 dpi. Anything larger, we'd like them to purchase through us to maintain quality.
    I've been trying to figure out a way to get Aperture to export the images we've edited out as these 4 x 6 at 300dpi, but for the life of me, I can't seem to get it right. We crop at 8 x 12 so the ratio is fine, but getting it to come out right it a bugger.
    I can't tell it to export at 4 x 6 because that only works for portrait and not landscape orientation. I can have a different export for each orientation since I have to maintain numbering consistency with our web galleries and their DVD copy.
    I finally ran it out at 50% of original size, but hardly any of the images come out at 300 dpi. Aperture is just not doing everything I assumed it would.
    Any ideas?

    Set up an export preset as follows (from memory, so I apologise for any slight wording errors):
    Duplicate JPG Original size preset and rename something like 6x4@300
    'Size to' 'Fit within Inches' Width 6.0 Height 6.0
    'DPI' 300
    sRGB colourspace
    Because all your images area already cropped to the right aspect ratio (3:2), setting size to 'fit within' will make the longest side 6 inches at 300dpi. It doesn't matter whether they are landscape or portrait. I have done it and it works perfectly.
    If you have different aspect ratios and want to crop to 3:2 then export automatically, that is more tricky, but I don't think that is what you want.

  • Exported iPhoto images not showing in folder

    Hi,
    When I export a group of NEF images from iPhoto 06 Library, as JPG, to a new folder the files do not appear.
    If I repeat the export for the other export options the images appear.
    I did repeat this exercise and exported the images as JPG onto a USB drive, and was able to see them listed when viewed on another laptop.
    Any suggestions?

    Hi,
    I found that if I set the image size for the JPG, then the files are visible.
    Does anyone know why the files are hidden when the size is not defined?
    Thanks.

  • How to export dynamic images into pdf

    Hi,
    I need to export a image into PDF which we are getting it from DBase. This returns me the image as BLOB and this we are putting it in between the xml tags. I am passing the xml to xsl-fo. While i tried to export the xml data into pdf using xsl-fo, the content is getting exported into pdf but not the image. I am using FOP, and i have added fop.jar, batik.jar, avalon-xx.jar, jai_codec.jar and jai_core.jar to my class path. I am putting my sample xsl and xml here.
    xml:
    <RTFDrugReport>
    <ImagePath>http://www.thomson-pharma.com/tp/images</ImagePath>
    <NewsEdge>
    <NewsItem>
    <StoryId><![CDATA[200705223600.15_2774000daba43be0]]></StoryId>
    <HeadlineText><![CDATA[NeuroLogica's CereTom Supplies On Site Post-Fight Brain CT During De  La Hoya-Mayweather Weekend]]></HeadlineText>
    <ItemTime><![CDATA[05/23/2007 03:22:24 AM EDT]]></ItemTime>
    </NewsItem>
    </NewsEdge>
    </RTFDrugReport>
    xsl:
    <fo:static-content flow-name="xsl-region-before">
    <fo:block font-family="Helvetica" font-size="14pt" text-align="left" white-space-collapse="false">
    <xsl:variable name="imageName" select="concat(//ImagePath,'/logo_thomson_pharma.png')"/>
    <fo:external-graphic src="'{$imageName}'"/>first
    <fo:external-graphic src="url('{$imageName}')"/>second
    <xsl:value-of select="'{$imageName}'"/>thrid
    <fo:external-graphic src="'{$imageName}'" content-width="100mm" content-height="100mm"/>fourth
    <fo:external-graphic src="'{$imageName}'" content-width="100mm" content-height="100mm"/>fifth
    <fo:instream-foreign-object src='url("///file:/D:/Customization/collage.jpg")' height="3cm" width="3cm"/>
    </fo:block>
    </fo:static-content>
    Any help would be appreciated.

    hi,
    all the UI elements in the adobe form are generally connected to your web-dynpro Context.
    whatever you type in the online adobe form is reflected in the respective context attributes of the dynpro Context of the view where "ur Interactive form UI element is".
    that means you can yourself fill the contents of ur interactive form by working on the get/set methods of the context attributes.
    Likewise you can clear the form by setting all context attributes to blank eg ""
    <b>interactive form has two imp properties:-</b>
    <b>*dataSource</b>
    data source points to the node all whose context attributes will be made available in the interactive form
    <b>*pdfsource</b>
    points to the context attribute which will hold the pdf.
    note that the type of this pdfSorce attribute will be binary.
    if you still have doubts.
    give me your gmail mail id. i 'll send a tutorial.
    with regards,
    -ag.

Maybe you are looking for