Export using sRGB IEC61966-2.1 color profile

HI,
I want to export some photos, in JPG format using color profile sRGB IEC61966-2.1.  In the "Export to Hard Drive" dialog box I see where to select the color space where I can select sRGB, AdobeRGB (1998), ProPhoto RGB, or Other.  When I select "other" I see a list of color profiles but sRGB IEC61966-2.1 is not included in the list.
How can I add sRGB IEC61966-2.1  to this list?
Thanks -- Dan

LR uses the standard v  2 profile (sRGB IEC61966-2.1) as I stated. You can, from the print module, replace it with a v 4 profile (sRGB_v4_ICC_preference. ). Of course this won't be used by any browser except Safari, may confuse print services, but does give some better results, unfortunately until at least Firefox sorts out their reluctance to allow v 4 profiles (and of course IE is beyond redemption) it isn't worth it. I wonder if Adobe will ever default to the v 4?

Similar Messages

  • Adobe Illustrator Export to JPEG (*.JPG) vs ICC Color Profiles vs Behance

    Hi,
    I work with Adobe Illustrator CC 2014. When I export my projects into *.JPG format (using both: 'Adobe Illustrator > File > Export' and 'Adobe Illustrator > File > Save for Web') I use ‘Embed ICC’ profile option. Every common image viewer I use (including web browsers and Adobe Bridge) respects those color settings and displays exactly what has been embedded. But when posting on Behance, my color settings are converted into something else! The only solution is to place my Adobe Illustrator file into a new Adobe Photoshop document , then export it into .JPG (with embedded color settings) and then post it to Behance. With this workaround my colors look pretty correct.
    Did someone experience the same and  could explain why Behance doesn’t respect the Adobe Illustrator export with embedded ICC profile settings?
    one thing more – even if my *.JPG produced with Adobe Photoshop (the correct one)  is displayed correctly, the cover photo (taken from the original) is still converted into different (Behance’s default??) color space. I believe this shouldn’t work this way. Is there any workaround to this? Is there any way my covers (miniatures) display the 'true' colors?
    Please advise
    Best Regards,
    Pawel Kuc
    ccmutants.com

    ok. I give up. It seems that Adobe Illustrator can export only to the JPEG File Interchange Format (JFIF) and Behence doesn’t fully support this format (for example it cannot read its icc color data correctly):
    (JPEG) Formally, the EXIF and JFIF standards are incompatible. This is because both specify that their particular application segment (APP0 for JFIF, APP1 for Exif) must be the first in the image file. In practice, many programs and digital cameras produce files with both application segments included. This will not affect the image decoding for most decoders, but poorly designed JFIF or Exif parsers may not recognize the file properly (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JPEG_File_Interchange_Format#Exif_comparison)
    I’ve analyzed my files using JPEGsnoop 1.6.1 (really cool app by Calvin Hass, http://www.impulseadventure.com/photo/) and here is what I’ve found:
    A) *.jpg produced with Adobe Illustrator > File > Export > JPEG > ICC profile embedded:
    *** Marker: SOI (xFFD8) ***
    OFFSET: 0x00000000
    *** Marker: APP0 (xFFE0) ***
    OFFSET: 0x00000002
    length     = 16
    identifier = [JFIF]
    version    = [1.2]
    density    = 72 x 72 DPI (dots per inch)
    thumbnail  = 0 x 0
    B) *.jpg produced with Adobe Illustrator > File > Save For Web > JPEG > ICC profile embedded:
    *** Marker: SOI (xFFD8) ***
    OFFSET: 0x00000000
    *** Marker: APP0 (xFFE0) ***
    OFFSET: 0x00000002
    length     = 16
    identifier = [JFIF]
    version    = [1.2]
    density    = 100 x 100 (aspect ratio)
    thumbnail  = 0 x 0
    C) *.jpg produced with Adobe Photoshop > File > Save As > JPEG > ICC Profile embedded
    *** Marker: SOI (xFFD8) ***
    OFFSET: 0x00000000
    *** Marker: APP1 (xFFE1) ***
    OFFSET: 0x00000002
    length          = 1320
    Identifier      = [Exif]
    Identifier TIFF = 0x[4D4D002A 00000008]
    Endian          = Motorola (big)
    TAG Mark x002A  = 0x002A
    EXIF IFD0 @ Absolute 0x00000014
    Dir Length = 0x0007
    [Orientation ] = Row 0: top, Col 0: left
    [XResolution ] = 720000/10000
    [YResolution ] = 720000/10000
    [ResolutionUnit ] = Inch
    [Software ] = "Adobe Photoshop CC 2014 (Windows)"
    [DateTime ] = "2014:08:02 17:21:15"
    [ExifOffset ] = @ 0x00A8
    Offset to Next IFD = 0x000000D4
    EXIF IFD1 @ Absolute 0x000000E0
    Dir Length = 0x0006
    [Compression ] = JPEG
    [XResolution ] = 72/1
    [YResolution ] = 72/1
    [ResolutionUnit ] = Inch
    [JpegIFOffset ] = @ +0x0132 = @ 0x013E
    [JpegIFByteCount ] = 1006
    Offset to Next IFD = 0x00000000
    EXIF SubIFD @ Absolute 0x000000B4
    Dir Length = 0x0003
    [ColorSpace ] = sRGB
    [ExifImageWidth ] = 200
    [ExifImageHeight ] = 200
    So unfortunately the only option to produce the EXIF JPEG from an Adobe Illustrator project is to: Export *.ai file to JPEG (under Adobe Illustrator) > go to Photoshop > Create new project > Paste the *.jpg > and Sava As JPEG with icc embedded.

  • Exported Jpgs - Questions with regards to color profiles and web browsers

    I along with others have noted the fact that it's not possible to instruct apertrue to save images without a profile. Up until recently I've been saving my images with the sRGB profile. I noted (as has been posted about elsewhere on the forums) that safari displays the image one way, and Firefox another. As others have noted, this is due to Safari being a color managed browser, and Firefox not being color managed.
    However, when I save a jpg out of photoshop with NO color profile applied the image looks identical in both browsers.
    I'm considering not using profiles as all if saving an image with an sRGB colorspace profile allows me to change the behavior so that Safari matches Firefox. I would love to go the other way (to do something magical to effect the way that images appear in Firefox) but that doesn't seem to be an options here.
    So, after all that, my questions are:
    1.) What is it specifically about not applying a profile, that makes Safari render images identically to FireFox (in other words, what's going on?)
    2.) Is there any way to apply NO profile to an exported Aperture Raw image...not the camera profile, not sRGB...NOTHING.
    I would guess a good runner up would be to use Automator to strip out the profile. But before I go making changes to my workflow, I'd really like to know why exactly this seems to work.

    This doesn't produce the same effect as in Photoshop.
    Photoshop has the ability to 'convert to profile'– to actually change the colors in an image so that even in a profile isn't embedded, the colors have been changed. If you choose to, you can also have Photoshop embed the profile as well.
    Aperture on the other hand, -seems- to only have the ability to attach a profile to an image. In other words, it relys on color aware apps to interpret the image using the attached profile. (I can't seem to find a way to 'convert' to a profile in Aperture, in the same way I can in Photoshop– doesn't mean one doesn't exist, I just can't seem to find it)

  • How do I export a file with a CMYK color profile in Lightroom?

    I'm trying to save a photo with a CMYK color profile to send to a company who will print it for me. I've looked at the color profiles installed on my computer, and quite a few CMYK profiles appear to be there (in   /Library/Application Support/Adobe/Color/Profiles/Recommended). I'm not sure if they need to be in the "Profiles" folder specifically, or if it matters that they're in a subfolder of that folder. This is on a Mac computer, by the way.
    The problem is, when I go to export in Lightroom, and I choose "Other" in Color Profile, I'm not given any of the CMYK options.
    Thanks for your help!
    Ray

    ray7199 wrote:
    I'm trying to save a photo with a CMYK color profile to send to a company who will print it for me. I've looked at the color profiles installed on my computer, and quite a few CMYK profiles appear to be there (in   /Library/Application Support/Adobe/Color/Profiles/Recommended).
    Above and beyond what Jeff and John have told you, be VERY careful converting RGB to CMYK unless you have the specific ICC profile for that print provider. Probably a lot safer to send them tagged RGB and let them convert the data. Converting with a profile that isn't specifically targeted for the print process will produce huge headache's for you and the shop and potentially awful output which is going to be expensive. Ask them if they can accept RGB and send them maybe sRGB which of course you can do from Lightroom.

  • Color Profile for SnapshotUtilsEx?

    Hello,
    I'm using SnapshotUtilsEx to get a pixel version of document spreads and pages. This works very well, but I can't figure out what color space the received image data is in. There seems to be no obvious way to find the attached ICC profile for the generated data.
    So please what is the recommended way to get a correct color profile that I can use with the received image data?
    Thanks.

    Since you say the printer "prints in color profile sRGB", it sounds as though you should save your images tagged with the sRGB IEC61966-2.1 color profile.
    If I'm understanding you correctly "Lab" does not mean "print lab", it's an acronym that describes an alternate color space for representing an image, fundamentally different from RGB.  Print houses normally don't expect an image to be sent to them in Lab mode.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lab_color_space
    In all seriousness, you should ask these questions of their customer service:
    1.  What format should I provide the image in (JPEG, TIFF, etc.)?
    2.  Should I tag the image with the sRGB IEC61966-2.1 color profile?
    -Noel

  • Color profile for print

    Do I need color profile for print taged in the file?
    I need to print some photos at LAB (photo lab) and they print in color space sRGB.
    I have created through Adobe Raw a JPEG file, which has untagged color profile.
    Is it necessary to have a color profile for a print at photo lab tagged in the file or better not?
    Thank you for explanation.

    Since you say the printer "prints in color profile sRGB", it sounds as though you should save your images tagged with the sRGB IEC61966-2.1 color profile.
    If I'm understanding you correctly "Lab" does not mean "print lab", it's an acronym that describes an alternate color space for representing an image, fundamentally different from RGB.  Print houses normally don't expect an image to be sent to them in Lab mode.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lab_color_space
    In all seriousness, you should ask these questions of their customer service:
    1.  What format should I provide the image in (JPEG, TIFF, etc.)?
    2.  Should I tag the image with the sRGB IEC61966-2.1 color profile?
    -Noel

  • Color profiles on export

    I've searched these forums and google for a few hours without finding a concrete answer for this problem.
    The problem is that, no matter what I do, every jpg I export from iphoto 08 seems to have the Adobe RGB color profile. This is contrary to what the docs say, which is that either the camera's profile (sRGB in this case) or "cameraRGB" (a variant of sRGB) should be used when "Embed ColorSync profile" is selected.
    With Adobe RGB, all my photos look like garbage on any non-mac (since they aren't color profile aware and assume sRGB).
    My photos originate as raw files from a Nikon D70. The D70 has sRGB set as its color profile. Using the ColorSync utility to change the camera from its original setting of cameraRGB to sRGB didn't make any difference. (As it shouldn't since they are essentially equivalent according to apple.)
    Any way to fix this, or do I need to move on from iphoto? Would it make a difference if I wasn't working with raw?

    slive:
    Welcome to the Apple Discussions. Try looking for all occurrences of the AdobeRGB1998.icc profile on your HD, archive them in place and remove the original profile. This will let you replace them if you find they are needed at a later date for some other use. Then try some new shots from the camera, import, edit and export. See if that will let you avoid having the Adobe profile used upon exit.
    There may be two or three on your Mac. You can find them with Spotlight.
    Do you Twango?
    TIP: For insurance against the iPhoto database corruption that many users have experienced I recommend making a backup copy of the Library6.iPhoto database file and keep it current. If problems crop up where iPhoto suddenly can't see any photos or thinks there are no photos in the library, replacing the working Library6.iPhoto file with the backup will often get the library back. By keeping it current I mean backup after each import and/or any serious editing or work on books, slideshows, calendars, cards, etc. That insures that if a problem pops up and you do need to replace the database file, you'll retain all those efforts. It doesn't take long to make the backup and it's good insurance.
    I've written an Automator workflow application (requires Tiger), iPhoto dB File Backup, that will copy the selected Library6.iPhoto file from your iPhoto Library folder to the Pictures folder, replacing any previous version of it. It's compatible with iPhoto 08 libraries. iPhoto does not have to be closed to run the application, just idle. You can download it at Toad's Cellar. Be sure to read the Read Me pdf file.

  • Using alternative color profiles in Aperture

    I have used many RAW Programs in the past. Now it is Aperture's turn. I have been a Mac user since 1994 and I am glad to see a program like Aperture.
    My question is about Alternate Color Profiles. I have not figured out how to use an alternate color profile for the images in Aperture. This can be done in PhotoShop, Capture One, and DPP for Canon. I have many wide gamut profiles I like to work with.
    My work around it to export the image to PhotoShop and apply the wider gamut profile to the image. I noticed that Aperture exports the image in Adobe RGB (1998). By doing so Aperture has already pared down the size of the color gamut of the image.
    How can I set Aperture to work in or export images in a wider gamut color profile?
    Thanks,
    Rob Eckert

    This may be of help:
    http://support.apple.com/kb/ht2026
    Setting your colorspace in Aperture
    In contrast with Adobe Photoshop, you don't have to set your "workspace." Instead, Aperture will always work in a wide gamut, except for when you apply Onscreen Proofing, which shows you how your work should look in final output.
    Perhaps the Onscreen Proofing feature will do what you want.
    And this for an overview:
    http://documentation.apple.com/en/aperture/usermanual/index.html#chapter=A%26sec tion=1%26tasks=true

  • Use which color profile when ordering iPhoto prints?

    Hello,
    I've got a bunch of photos I want to order thru the iPhoto service. Many of the photos have an embedded sRGB (Nikon mode Ia) color profile. Should I convert / save the photos with just an RGB profile or will sRGB work OK? These prints will be 8x10.
    Thanks!

    How do you determine whether a profile has been embedded in your images?
    Unless you manually edit iPhoto's preferences it won't embed any profile upon import. On the other hand Image Capture does embed a profile.
    Some cameras only reference a generic profile in the images' EXIF data (instead of embedding one) but that won't be honoured by iPhoto. Even if your images had a profile embedded it will have been discarded by editing them in iPhoto - something to watch out for.
    As far as ordering prints goes it's impossible to predict the outcome.
    Cheers Martin

  • Using custom color profiles....leica m8 on import

    Is it possible to use or assign a custom color profile like I would in capture 1? Thanks

    +If these aren't in /Library sub folders they could be in /Users/yourname/Library sub folder (depends if they were installed for a single user or all users)+
    SHAZAM!! You solved it for me. When you told me to check the directories before, I was already in Users/yourname/etc. I didn't realize there was another Library at the System level. The profiles were there, glaring at me like they'd been there the whole time. Imagine that.
    All the subfolders you mentioned were in there respective places too.
    But that brings up another question... One always leads to another, right?
    Why do I have three 'Library' folders that all have Colorsync folders with different profiles in them???
    I've got one at StartUpDrive/Library/subfolders
    another at StartUpDrive/System/Library/subfolders
    and a third at StartUpDrive/username/Library, though this one hasn't been modified since 2004. Can I delete it?
    Thanks a ton
    Bruce

  • Color profiles in Lightroom 3 for online printing

    Hi,
    I would like to know if I can enter color profiles in Lightroom 3 for online printing. I am going to use Adormapix and they have color profiles for each paper. Is there a way to do this in LR 3 and if not is this available in LR 4 or 5? I plan to upgrade in the next 6 months but may upgrade sooner if I need to.

    Generally, profiles provided by labs are not for imbedding, or converting the image to send for on-line printing. They are used to simulate the final output on your screen so you have an idea what you will be getting back from the lab on that paper. This is called soft proofing. It is available in Lightroom 4 or 5 by hitting the [S] key while in the Develop module.  Choosing a profile in the Soft Proofing dialog that appears beneath the histogram is a way to see how your final print will approximately appear on a selected media.
    From Adorama's website: "We print in sRGB color space, so for best results convert your images before uploading." meaning that you will want to send Adorama sRGB images only. When you create a JPEG file to send to Adorama, you will want to specify sRGB in the Lightroom Export dialog under File Settings.

  • Color Profile Settings

    Hi Everyone,
    I am a graphic designer and do a mix of web / print work. I am ashamed to say it but i've never really messed around with color profiles as i've always been afraid to mess things up, so i always kept everything on default settings in photoshop.
    I recently bought a new monitor, a Samsung S24SA850. Out of the box I could tell the colors were off right away. I do not own a monitor calibration tool so I tried setting the adjustments on the monitor as best as I could but I was sort of disapointed still. After posting in some forums asking for help someone else who had the same monitor was kind enough to provide me with their color profile which was obtained using a professional calibration tool. After applying this profile in windows 7's "Color Management" application I finaly was satisfied with the colors on my screen.
    After a while I realized that when doing work in photoshop and looking at the results in my web browser, the colors were not exactly the same... I opened the "Color Settings" panel in photoshop and saw that I was using the "North America General Purpose 2" setting which I assume is the default, with the RGB working space set to "sRGB IEC61966-2.1" , when I clicked on the drop down to show what the other RGB option were I could see my monitor's custom color profile there so i selected it and saw that the colors in my document changed and it actually reflects the colors that I see in windows or my browser.
    I wonder if doing this change can be bad in some way though ? I notice that the setting changed from "North America General Purpose 2" to "Custom" and that because i selected my monitor's custom profile in the working space RGB drop down that now in the "Color Management Policies" options the RGB drop down was set to "OFF" instead of "Preserve Embedded Profiles" which was previously selected before, and I cannot select that option anymore because it is greyed out.
    Also when creating a new document in photoshop i notice there is an "advanced" zone, where I can choose a color profile, right now I set it to "dont color manage this document" but am again wondering if this is a mistake...
    Basically, I'd really appreciate if anyone could tell me exactly what needs to be changed or if i should change anything at all ? should I go back to the default North America General Purpose 2 settings even though the colors dont look exactly the same as when i view the artwork in other programs/windows/browser ?
    Thanks,

    Rasta_Cook wrote:
    Wait, you mean that i shouldnt use the monitor's custom color profile EVEN in window's "color management" application ?
    Well, in your case you should, because you got the profile from somewhere else. But a calibrator will do it automatically - and from that point you don't touch it. Especially not in PS color settings.
    If the profile works, by all means use it. But a calibrator may not be as expensive as you think, and will get you a better result. Windows just assigns sRGB by default.
    then I can take screenshots and paste them and the color always remain the same
    Screenshots is actually one of those special cases I mentioned above. To get it to match, first assign the monitor profile and then convert to sRGB.
    The basic principle here is that if the document profile is the same as the monitor profile, color management is disabled because no conversion happens and the document RGB values are sent unchanged to the display. Then everything will match - but it won't be right. With a good monitor profile you can trust Photoshop.

  • Preview.app & Color Profiles?

    Okay, I figured this would be the best place to ask this question. Okie, so I have a couple of JPEGs before I switched to the RAW format so I'm pretty sure these have color profiles in them (right clicking, Get Info reveals RGB). However, when I view them in Preview, they look absolutely like crap. When I port them over to Photoshop, it appears just as it should.
    HOWEVER, images which are exported using sRGB from Aperture (RAW to JPEG), appear fine in both Preview and Photoshop. So whats going on?

    My suspicion is that rendering an image with a small color space (sRGB IEC 61966-2.1) into a wider one should work as there are no constraints. Of course, writing a wide color space (as is Aperture) to a small one such as sRGB or sRGB IEC:blah without on screen proofing it first means you will get all sorts of effects you didn't want. BTW, as far as my understanding goes, sRGB is merely the short-hand of sRGB IEC 61966-2.1 and includes ITU-R BT.709/2 file transformation. Hence the popularity of sRGB.
    This (if I understood the initial q.) begs a q. as to why you see differences between an sRGB and an sRGB IEC blah profile of course.
    sRGB was defined by HP and MSFT, the adopted by W3C, Pantone etc. as the standard for color rendition on "typical" 1996 color CRT monitors. These CRT's had restricted ability to present color accurately in office lighting conditions, and so the color space is very restricted. Additionally, since it focused on CRT's, it has a way curvaceous gamma curve (to map CRT luminance at different black levels to a perceived linear brightness by Mk 1 eyeballs) which is why it throws contrasts off so much on LCD's.
    Light-hearted reading for insomniacs at ...
    http://www.srgb.com/srgboverview/index.htm

  • Correct Color Profile in Keynote '09 (or '08)

    I have been tasked with putting together a photography presentation for six photographers. The presentation will be projected (with two Epson projectors and six color monitors) in Keynote ’09 (and ’08) for a one-night photographer’s gallery exhibit. One of the concerns raised by one of the photographers who has used Keynote (not sure the version, but probably ’08 or earlier) is that there is a "*color shift*" that occurs from the original saved image. All images are exported from (Apple) Aperture, (Adobe) Lightroom, and (Adobe) PhotoShop CS3-CS5 using the Adobe RGB 1998 Color Profile.
    All photographers (including myself) are working with Aperture, Lightroom, or PhotoShop and are saving their final images with the Adobe RGB (1998) ICC color profile.
    Is there a way to ensure “correct” color profiles are used in Keynote ’09 (and ’08)? If so, how is this done?
    Any help would be appreciated.

    Welcome to the discussions, anthonysan.
    There isn't a way within the program to do it, however it IS possible I think. I'll give you some tips to start down that path, and, if you have any questions, just post back here.
    First, go to Keynote preferences and, under General Preferences, choose "Save new documents as packages". Next, create a new document (white theme), change the Master to blank, and place three rectangles on the first slide, each with an EASY to define color. (By "easy to define" I mean pick colors that you would be able to discern numerically, for example 100% red, 100% black, 100% green, etc.) Finally, double click inside each shape and add some unique text. I'm using "firstone", "secondone", "thirdone".
    Now, save that document, then right-click (two-finger-click, control-click) on it's icon in the Finder. You should see an option to Show Package Contents. Select that and you should then see a few folders and some files. You're looking for index.apxl.zip. Double click that one to unzip it, then put the .zipped version in the trash (Keynote can read either just as well). Now, you should have an index.apxl file.
    When you double-click the index.apxl file, you'll have to choose to open it with TextEdit, then search for your unique text "firstone".
    Things get more detailed from this point, but it does lead to a potential solution. Let me know if you're following so far, and we can look at the mysteries within they Keynote file

  • Missing color profiles

    When I view images in Bridge it shows that I have either sRGB or Adobe 1998 color profiles embedded with images. When I try to open them in CS2 I get the dialog box stating they have no embedded profile??? I'm talking about jpeg files in Bridge. I have two color spaces I work in, sRGB for jpegs and Adobe 1998 for converted raw files either in tiff or psd. These load just fine as the have been saved as Adobe 1998. My profile setting have remained the same as far as I can tell, the mismatch and missing warning boxes are checked. Any ideas what might have taken place?
    Thanks for any help.

    If Bridge shows the profile, it's there. Your Photoshop CS2 preferences or installation could be corrupted. Try trashing prefs first.
    To re-create the preferences files for Photoshop or ImageReady, start the application while holding down Ctrl+Alt+Shift (Windows) or Command+Option+Shift (Mac OS X). Then, click Yes to the message, "Delete the Adobe Photoshop Settings file?" or "Delete the Adobe ImageReady Settings file?"
    That's an excerpt from:
    http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/knowledgebase/index.cfm?id=331483

Maybe you are looking for

  • Using Time Machine to restore external hard drive data

    I have been using a Mac Mini running 10.6.8 for years as a media server.  I have always been very careful to maintain backups of everything, and the inevitable did happen - the hard drive containing all my media did fail. To clarify my set up, my Mac

  • REG: Graphical Mapping

    Hi All,             I have scenario where i need to split 1 input file( xml ) to n files based on one of the i/p values and post those n files in the  target directory. Is it possible in the graphical mapping and if not which mapping is preferable? T

  • Video Streaming Issues

    Hello, I am experiencing some loading issues with slide videos in my project.  I am trying to determine if it is how I have the slide video setup, or if it's the environment some of our users are in.  To begin here is some further detail related to m

  • IDVD won't burn DVD, previews fine

    Hello, I am trying to burn a fcp 5 project onto a dvd+r with idvd. the project previewed fine in the idvd, but when i put the dvd in, it says it can't read the dvd and that there's nothing in the drive. The dvds are brand new and have never been used

  • How do I find a driver for a Dell 1320c Colour Laser Printer for a MacBook Pro running OSX 10.9.2

    How do I find a printer driver for a Dell 1320c Color Laser Printer for use on a MacBook Pro running Mavericks OSX 10.9.2?