Export window: Image Sizing - "deselected": Resolution

If I have Image Sizing "deselected" - does the inputted "Resolution" matter?
I printed several photos and afterwards realized that I had "72 dpi" instead of 300 dpi.
But I did not have Image Sizing selected - so does that box selection/deselection affect output resolution or not?
Thank-you,

The resolution is generally just a tag and quite meaningless. It hints at the final size of the image, but basically every application ignores the tag anyway and just displays the image at 1:1 on the screen or scaled down. It is only relevant to the export quality when you resize on export and specify a size in inches or cm. In that case your final image size will end up to be horizontal size(in)*ppi x vertical size(in)*ppi. If you specify a size in pixels, the tag is not used.
See for example here, or here for more. 72 dpi is not used for anything anymore. Most displays are around 110 ppi, but even that is irrelevant. Just think as digital images by their dimension in pixels and ignore the ppi tag.

Similar Messages

  • Exporting photos for UHDTV or Native 4K TV, what are the best settings ? (File: Quality File: Color Space, Image Sizing and resolution)   Or in other words; How can I get the smallest files but keep good quality for display on new UHDTV

    Exporting photos for UHDTV or Native 4K TV, what are the best settings ? (File: Quality File: Color Space, Image Sizing and resolution)   Or in other words; How can I get the smallest files but keep good quality for display on new UHDTV

    You're welcome, and thank you for the reply.
    2) Yesterday I made the subclips with the In-Out Points and Command-U, the benefit is that I've seen the clip before naming it. Now I'm using markers, it's benefit is that I can write comment and (the later) clip name at once, the drawback is that I have to view to the next shot's beginning before knowing what the shot contains.
    But now I found out that I can reconnect my clips independently to the format I converted the master clip to. I reconnected the media to the original AVI file and it worked, too! The more I work with, the more I'm sold on it... - although it doesn't seem to be able to read and use the date information within the DV AVI.
    1) Ok, I tried something similar within FCE. Just worked, but the file size still remains. Which codec settings should I use? Is the export to DV in MOV with a quality of 75% acceptable for both file size and quality? Or would be encoding as H.264 with best quality an option for archiving, knowing that I have to convert it back to DV if I (maybe) wan't to use it for editing later? Or anything else?
    Thank's in advance again,
    André

  • Exporting graphics/images at full-resolution?

    Good morning.
    So, I've got a series of indesign documents, all of which contain various different types of placed graphics; eps, png, jpg, ai, psd, and the like.
    I know that I can export these graphics from Indesign server, via script, by iterating allGraphics, or, splineItems, just to name a few.
    What I noticed, though, is that the exported file is sized to the frame it was placed in.  In other words, if I placed a 3000x2000 px jpeg into a 320x240pt box, did some fitting options on it (say, fill Proportionally), then the exported image will be just that, 320x240.
    How do I go about exporting these Graphics at full-resolution? IE: I want my exported PNG to be 3000x2000.
    Suggestions?
    Thanks.

    "An odd way to use ID…" -- That brought a smile to my face. Perhaps, odd, yes, but I've done worse, believe me.
    There is a valid reason I have for not doing a collection, and pulling out the orginal assets/Links. I require them to be PNG.
    InDesign server does a bang-up job at converting all EPS or AI or PSD files into PNG when I ask it to, but, it does so at a cost: It shrinks the exported/converted files to fit the size of their containing frames. Poo.
    Here's a snipperoo of what I'm doing. Perhaps someone else has done the same, and figured out the full-size problem I'm facing.
    This is part of a larger script, I've trimmed fat for brevity
    (function(){
        var graphicExportDir = new Folder(source.path+"/graphics");
        graphicExportDir.exists||graphicExportDir.create();
        d.allGraphics.each(function(graphic){
            // Can I do something, here, to get my pal InDesign server to export at full-res?
            graphic.exportFile(ExportFormat.PNG_FORMAT, File(graphicExportDir+"/"+graphic.itemLink.name+".png"));

  • Lightroom 4. I have a large image (scanned) 10,000 X 14000 which does not Render when I try to print or export.   Regular sized images work fine.

    In Lightroom 4:Mac OS 10.6.8.     I have an expecially large image (scanned) which is 10,000 X 14,000.  I have edited it but when I try to print or export the image, it starts to "Rendering Page" but gets stuck and is unable to complete the task before it times out.    When I use normal sized photo images (raw), it works fine.  I suspect the problem is related to the size of the file.   Is there some way I can reduce the size of the image while in Lightlroom?   Or is there any other solution? 

    You originally posted on a thread that really wasn't related to your problem, so I branched the discussion.
    Check the Windows System Event Viewer to see the details of the crash, most importantly the name of the faulting module.
    Most crashes on Open or Save are due to OS bugs (especially on MacOS) or bugs in third party extensions to the OS open and save dialogs.

  • Export - Image sizing -  Resize to Fit :  Percentage please

    PLease ad the ability to resize images with percentage unit, in the export -> image sizing panel.  thanks

    Lr always uses three decimals for dimensions in the export dialog. So 22 cm is exactly the same as 22,000 cm.
    Maybe you're used to a dot as a decimal separator, and a comma as a thousand separator? If so, it probably looks like 22 thousand cm to you.
    Whether to use a dot or a comma for a decimal separator, is set in your computer's operating system.
    On windows, Control panel > Region and language.

  • Problem with Export - Image Sizing

    Hello, I'm running LR3 on a relatively new iMac.  I am using LR to edit RAW photos from my Nikon D700 and one of the things I do is export to .jpg to put some photos on my website.  To do this, each photo must be the same width and height, or it causes issues with the website.
    For awhile, I was exporting images at dimensions of 960x636 with no issues.  All of a sudden, when I use the export feature, and put in the Image Sizing section the 960x636 resolution, the exported file is at a resolution of 956x636 and therefore is not the same size as previously exported photos.  I've tried changing some of the settings in the Image Sizing section (check/uncheck Don't Enlarge, Dimensions vs. Width & Height, etc.) and nothing seems to work.  Any advice why LR3 is overriding my image size settings would be greatly appreciated.

    When you specify the width and height on export, you are specifying a "box" that Lightroom will fit the image into. It will do the best it can, but if your cropped image doesn't have the same aspect ratio as the "box", then one dimension will be short. As an example, if you had cropped your picture into a square, how could Lightroom possibly completely fill a rectangle with it?
    You need to crop your images to the same ratio as the 956 : 636 that you're specifying on Export.
    Hal

  • Firefox mage quality and resolution was superb when I used XP and Vista. Now that I have Windows 7, however (with the Firefox 3.6.3 version), the image quality and resolution is poor. Please help me!

    I am using the Firefox 3.6.3 version with my new Windows 7 operating system. When I used all the previous Firefox versions in my XP and Vista operating systems, image quality and resolution was excellent! However, now that I have upgraded to Windows 7 and Firefox 3.6.3, the image quality and resolution is poor (unacceptable for downloading purposes).
    == This happened ==
    Every time Firefox opened
    == I first activated my new computer and installed the Firefox 3.6.3.

    All my images are pixelated in firefox 3.6.3
    http://www.dcgdcreative.com
    Not only on my site but on most sites I view.
    The issue is not solved by resetting the zoom text view (ctrl+0)
    The issue is not resolved by starting in safemode with add-ons disabled
    The problem seems to only affect .jpeg files and only on Windows 7 on my desktop; as I have viewed several sites using windows XP with my laptop, no issues.
    I had the same issue with IE8 and was able to fix the problem with by setting up the compatibility view for all sites. Issue fixed no problems at all. But nothing similar for firefox?
    Whats the deal?

  • How can I export an image from Illustrator same canvas size and custom resolution?

    Hey all.  i am using Adobe Illustrator CS5 for creating images for iPhone app icons the size of image 374 px 374 px and 264 ppi. i created an image same size and ppi .the problem after export the image file size changing to  1371px x 1371px and 264 ppi pixel dimension.How can I export same canvas size and same resolution file from illustrator

    10111980,
    If you just forget about PPI and use Save for Web, you will get the 374 x 374 pixel size.
    The 1371 x 1371 pixels is because you somehow increase the resolution by 264/72.
    You should never mix pixel by pixel sizes and PPI.
    The 374 x 374 pixels is the actual image size. At 264 PPI that will be about 1.417 inches. At 72 PPI that will be about 5.194 inches.

  • Lightroom 5.3 Image Sizing in export not working as expected

    When I export an image and specify the maximum dimensions in the Image Sizing section, Lightroom only honors the maximum width or height if both original dimensions are below the requested setting.
    For example, I have an image with original dimensions of 2592x1936.
    If I export using 1935x1935 in the Image Sizing section with option "Width & Height" or "Dimension", I get an exported file with dimensions 1935x1445. The "width" is properly constrained to the maximum value I've entered.
    However, if I export using 1937x1937, the resulting exported file has dimensions 2592x1936--the original size of the image.
    I've tried the same with an original image of 1936x2592 and get similar results.
    Am I not applying this setting correctly?

    There's cuurently a bug in the LR5.3 export process (been reported many times, and hopeful of a fix come 5.4). The bug is caused by having the "Don't Enlarge" option checked, so unchecking it will fix the problem. If unchecking it is a problem, see this thread for help:
    http://feedback.photoshop.com/photoshop_family/topics/publish_service_harddisk_ignores_ima ge_sizing_resize_to_fit_short_edge_setting_when_source_image_is_a_dng_on_lightroom

  • When exporting an image: Image sizing, resize to fit auto changes measurements eg 22cm becomes 22,000cm. How do I fix this?

    When exporting an image in LR, any measurement entered into "Risize to fit...."automatically changes the measurement from 22cm to 22,000cm. for eg. or 33cm becomes 33,000cm.
    How do I fix this?

    Lr always uses three decimals for dimensions in the export dialog. So 22 cm is exactly the same as 22,000 cm.
    Maybe you're used to a dot as a decimal separator, and a comma as a thousand separator? If so, it probably looks like 22 thousand cm to you.
    Whether to use a dot or a comma for a decimal separator, is set in your computer's operating system.
    On windows, Control panel > Region and language.

  • How do I modify the behaviour of "Image Sizing" Module in Export

    As part of the export process I want to re-size an image to a fixed size e.g., 5400x3600. The iamge should be scaled symmetrically and therefore some fill-in of black or white may be necessary.
    I know I can do this as a "post-process" action, but then I need to re-do sharpening, assigning colour profile etc.
    So is there a way in the SDK to "replace" the "Image Sizing" Module with one of my own making?
    Best wishes
    Terry

    You can disable the image sizing portion of the UI and use the updateExportSettings() function on your export service provider to force the image size to your desired size. (This function is not well documented. It takes a single parameter, exportSettings, which you may modify in place before the export starts.) For example (this would go inside your export service provider declaration):
    updateExportSettings = function( exportSettings )
        exportSettings.LR_size_resizeType = 'wh'  -- specific width and height
        exportSettings.LR_maxHeight = 3600
        exportSettings.LR_maxWidth = 5400
    end,
    hideSections = { 'imageSettings' },  -- hide the sizing panel
    However, there is not a way to get Lightroom to render a file that is cropped to a specific aspect ratio. Whatever sizing parameters are specified, we will always honor the aspect ratio of the source file. In your processRenderedFiles function, you could use a third-party tool like Mogrify to regenerate the output file with the fill necessary to satisfy the desired aspect ratio.

  • Export applet Image to a browser window

    Hi folks,
    I have an applet that creates an organization chart loaded from xml:
    http://www.easypay-group.com/Flowchart/bin/test.htm
    Now I want to export my Image (BufferedImage) to a browser window.
    I think by doing that I don't need to sign my applet, the only problem is that I don't know how to do this.
    Thanks in advance,
    Pieter

    You've gone down the wrong path here by using Photoshop or
    any graphics app
    to build your html code for you. It's fragile, dodgy and
    really only
    intended for quick prototypes; not full production sites. As
    soon as you
    start adding content to this layout, it's going to blow up on
    you.
    Recommendation: Use Pshop to optimize image slices. Use DW to
    build the
    HTML code by inserting images into a pre-made CSS layout like
    this one.
    CSS Liquid Layout, Centered on page.
    http://alt-web.com/TEMPLATES/CSS2-Liquid-Page.shtml
    Also, read this tutorial:
    Taking a Fireworks (or PhotoShop) comp to a CSS based layout
    in DW
    http://www.adobe.com/devnet/fireworks/articles/web_standards_layouts_pt1.html
    Nancy O.
    Alt-Web Design & Publishing
    www.alt-web.com

  • Image sizing frustration in Lightroom 5.6

    I need to export a jpeg "headshot" photo in the exact dimensions of width 1 2/3" X height 2" with 300dpi resolution.  When I select "export"... I see a "image sizing" section.  When I plug in the parameters... It only exports my original cropped photo.  What am I doing wrong?  Or what am I missing?

    You need to set the file format to JPG (not Original) in the Export dialog box

  • LR 5 - Image Sizing Dimensions - wrong image size

    Hi,
    Image Sizing Dimensions produces wrong image sizes upon export for certain images.
    Example, I have export set up for iPad resolution, 2048x1536px at 264ppi. If I now export an 3264x4928px image it should be resized to 1356x2048px. What I get is 1356x2047 instead, one pixel too short on the long side. This doesn't happen for all images source resolutions and ratios though. I haven't figured out the pattern yet.
    Here a link to an image which exports at wrong size (export dimension set to 2048x1536px).
    http://www.bobtronic.com/files/IMG_0289.JPG
    I would appreciate a speedy fix for this problem. Thanks
    cheers,
    Matthias

    The image has a resolution of 3264x4928. Exporting using Dimension resizing of 2048x1536 results in an 2047x1536 image.
    The scaling factor 4928 down to 2048, is 0.4155844155844156...
    Assuming that LR is working to only 3 decimal places here, which indications discussed in another thread would suggest, then there are several ways to achieve that:
    truncate down to 0.415 by discarding the subsequent digits
    "quick-rounding" of the third digit by inspecting the fourth-place digit only, and incrementing the third-place digit when the fourth-place digit is larger than 5, which it is not in this case, resulting in 0.415
    "math-rounding" by inspecting all of the following digit pairs in turn, until you reach a pair that is lower than 50, and then working back again to simplify. This procedure rounds 0.41558 up to 0.4156, then after doing that, rounds 0,4156 up to 0.416
    Speculation: the difference between 0.415 and 0.416, is the difference between a result with 2047, and one with 2048, when executed.
    Most of the time the "quick-round" procedure will work out fine, also truncating will usually be good enough, assuming the above has anything to do with the reality (which it may not). Just occasionally, though, there'll be an error in the final digit, compared with what the theoretically accurate procedure would have given. So if I am right this is not strictly speaking a bug (something failing to execute as it has been designed to do), but the result of a software design choice. "Works as designed", iow .
    It seems that LR, perhaps differently between versions, is working this through by simple calculation (from the front-end), without comparing the back-end outcome against what you have requested. How much this (intermittent) issue actually matters, is a question of judgement, and of particular requirement.
    [ alternative method: I find the Print module, outputting to JPG, is completely reliable when it comes to making a standardised JPG as to the dimensions, as well as offering some different technical and design options, than what you get with Export. For one thing, you get the option of on-the-fly cropping to shape, which you can then adjust interactively where (as here) the image is a different aspect than the Retina display. So if you want it, you can fill the screen instead of getting letterbox, all without having altered your main (Develop) crop for that image. Alternatively, if you don't want the Zoom to Fill option (e.g. with landscape images to be shown in portrait orientation as part of a sequence) you can still make all your images to the same dimension, but controlling the appearance of the borders that are left (which become part of the image) ]
    RP
    ps: AFAICT one would expect simple truncation to produce the appropriate answer half of the time; one would expect simple rounding to just one further digit, to be wrong half of the times when the following digit happened to be 5 - or to put in another way, to be right in 95% of cases; and proper rounding, examinng as many places as it takes, to be right 100% (within precision limits).

  • How to both resize AND export to PNG at specific resolution?

    I am trying to export a PAIR of vector files as PNG-24's, one at 72 ppi and the second at 150 ppi, Illustrator CC.
    I also want both exported files to have a different SIZE that their existing (and of course, completely arbitrary) vector dimensions.
    If I use Save for Web in Illustrator CC, I can indeed change the size, BUT I can't specify a resolution!
    On the other hand if I try to do a File > Export, I can easily specify the resolution as 150 ppi, BUT I can't change the size!
    If I go 'way back to my Illustrator CS4 version, there was a toolbar display of the selected object's  (or group's) physical dimensions - see the attached image - but I can't seem to find it in the CC version of Illustrator.
    As Retina resolution images have been around for several years, it would be helpful to be able to have complete control over how vector images created in Illustrator could be output at 150 ppi AND with the ability to specify the physical size. And, being able to write an action to export the pair of different resolution images would be even better.
    Am I missing the obvious here? For the time being, I am back to my old machine with Illustrator CS4 just to export Retina-friendly images...

    This is not the issue - pixels are pixels, you're right. It is a question, rather, of how awkward it is to export the different sized files from Illustrator.
    Here's the problem. Supposed I have a vector file that has nominal dimensions of 385px  x 91px on the artboard - can't even SEE that info anymore, as I noted. (I'm sure there's a toggle somewhere for that, but I can't seem to find it...)
    I want to export this as a PNG at a smaller size, say at 62% = 239px × 57px. OK, just click and it's done, Save for Web, 62%.
    Now, I need to export it at twice that physical size for the Retina version. If I didn't write down my first PNG's EXPORTED dimensions, (and I work on a LOT of these files...), when I go back to Save for Web, I have to manually remember to double the first file's EXPORTED dimensions, i.e., 239px × 57px = 124% to get my larger file of 478px × 114px.
    On the other hand, if I go to File > Export, Illustrator lets me create larger files, but won't let me change the dimensions of the original file to begin with. It just makes no sense to me. If I could reset the vector's nominal size FIRST, it would be much simpler. One Save for Web, then one Export at Medium Res.

Maybe you are looking for

  • QuickTime Player output

    Hi, I'm a total beginner with FCE. While I'm waiting to save up for a good camera I just want to use the MBP iSight to experiment and practice, so I set up the QT player to record at "device native" quality. This means that the output mov files have

  • Extended CO

    Dear All For extended the CO. I done the following step 1) Create a new project 2) Add server.xml from path oracle.apps.pa.finplan.server 3) Add new business component oracle.apps.xxabcpa.finplan.webui 4) add the XML page from path oracle.apps.pa.fin

  • No commitment item entered in item 002

    Hi, We have activated the BCS part of FM, and while posting the entry through MIR4, following is the error. "No commitment item entered in item 002...." This item pertains to GR/Ir clearing account. In one of the thread the solution given is "using t

  • Installing Reader & Flash

    I've spent the past couple weeks trying to install Adobe CS3--running the Adobe cleaner, ccleaner, uninstalling ALL my Adobe software, deleting my Adobe directories from my program files folder, changing virus & firewall settings and nothing seems to

  • Error 1 In the updating

    Hello All, When i am loading the data from R/3,It ig giving "Error 1 in the update"...PLEASE ANY ONE GIVE ME SOLUTION. THANKS, MUDDU rEDDY