Exported JPEGs from LR2.7 are too orange

I am using LR 2.7 and a color calibrated EIZO Color Edge 222W monitor.  When I export images as JPEGs and view the images using Windows Picture and Fax viewer the images ae significantly color shifted to the orange.  It doesn't matter which color space I use for exporting.  If I import that JPEG image back into LR and compare it to the original they are identical.  This appears to be a recent phenomenon as I have not noticed it in the past.  I recently installed PS CS5 on my computer.  Thinking there may be a connection, I uninstalled CS5 but the problem persists.
Can anyone help me resolve this problem?
Thanks

That monitor is a wide gamut monitor. You cannot trust non-color managed apps on that at all. They will NOT show you what other people see. On such a monitor you have to use a color managed browser such as Firefox (make sure to calibrate to a v2 matrix profile. Firefox does not support v4 monitor profiles) and Safari. Firefox can be set up to even color manage untagged images. Chrome is not color managed on windows but is on Mac OS X Snow Leopard. The only fix for this if you don't want to use anything but IE is to buy another monitor with a gamut closer to sRGB.

Similar Messages

  • Can someone help! PDF export failed claims "pages are too big" they are 8x10??

    Can someone help! PDF export failed claims "pages are too big" they are 8x10??
    I'm trying to export an 100 page magazine, just a small proof right now and I've done this a million times. There are no errors, all my links are good but still it will not save.
    Can anyone help!

    Hi marthah,
    I'd love to help, but need a little more information to go on. Are you converting from or to PDF, and where is this error occurring (in Acrobat, InDesign, or somewhere else)? What operating system/browser are you using?
    Thanks,
    Sara

  • Exporting Jpegs from Lightroom - DPI question

    When I export Jpegs from Lightroom, I set the dpi to 300 pixels per inch. I do not specify a max width or height. When I view these files in Adobe Bridge (CS2 or CS3) the file info says 300dpi. However, when I open the files in Photoshop and select image size, It says 72dpi and has the document size set to very large. I realize that I can enter 300 dpi and uncheck the resample box, I am just confused as to why this is happening.
    My concern is, that I upload my images directly to my lab after exporting from Lightroom. Will this cause problems?
    Thanks in advance!
    David

    the image resolution is a combination of the two parameters you mention: size and dpi. a very large size at 72 dpi is equivalent to a small size (like 3x5) at very high dpi. for printing you want at least 240 dpi at the largest size that allows you to keep that resolution. for screen presentations or your web site you want jut 72 dpi. 72 dpi and 2x3 inches will require a very small file size.
    I suggest you to export images at TIFF and not JPEG as that will allow you to preserve the image quality when doing editing in PS.
    In my case I export TIFF for PS (when I need PS editing) and 72 dpi JPEG for my web site (that way if somebody downloads my image illegally thy get a poor resolution copy). But since LR works very well for me 90% of the images re just kept in raw mode and I print from LR.

  • Exporting JPEGs from InDesign CS4

    I've exported jpegs from InDesign CS4 for years and each time I get an Export JPEG dialog box that gives me the option to adjust the resolution. Suddenly, when I export to JPEG, I get no dialog box and it automatically creates a JPEG at 300 dpi. I've looked everywhere in Preferences to see if I inadvertently changed settings, but I find nothing. Help?

    Try this forums.adobe.com/thread/526990

  • Problem with exported jpegs from CS5 PSDs with transparent backgrounds

    I've detected an issue where when exporting jpegs from a CS5 PSD layered file with a transparent background, the jpegs don't have a pure white background (255, 255, 255). They seem to range from 250, 250, 250 to 253, 253, 253.
    LR3 with same export settings does not show this behavior--it's pure white: 255, 255, 255.

    Bill,
    Another very helpful solution and I appreciate knowing how to fix it in both applications. Thanks!
    Wolf

  • Exported black/white pictures are too dark

    Hi,
    My exported black and white pictures are too dark. I checked the pictures and the exif info contains information about the color profile RGB and sRGB (see below), but still the browsers (firefox and safari) ignore this and display the pictures way to dark. Is there a way to fix this? firefox has color management enabled and safari probably too. As for firefox: there are probably users that do not have color management enabled and it should work for them as well.
    Could the problems be due to the reduced 8bit color depth of jpeg?
    Any suggestions are highly welcome.
    Thanks!
    Color Space Data           
    : RGB
    Profile Connection Space   
    : XYZ
    Profile Date Time          
    : 1998:02:09 06:49:00
    Profile File Signature     
    : acsp
    Primary Platform           
    : Microsoft Corporation
    CMM Flags                  
    : Not Embedded, Independent
    Device Manufacturer        
    : IEC
    Device Model               
    : sRGB
    Device Attributes          
    : Reflective, Glossy, Positive, Color
    Rendering Intent           
    : Perceptual
    Connection Space Illuminant
    : 0.9642 1 0.82491
    Profile Creator            
    : HP
    Profile ID                 
    : 0
    Profile Copyright          
    : Copyright (c) 1998 Hewlett-Packard Company
    Profile Description        
    : sRGB IEC61966-2.1
    Media White Point          
    : 0.95045 1 1.08905
    Media Black Point          
    : 0 0 0
    Red Matrix Column          
    : 0.43607 0.22249 0.01392
    Green Matrix Column        
    : 0.38515 0.71687 0.09708
    Blue Matrix Column         
    : 0.14307 0.06061 0.7141
    Device Mfg Desc            
    : IEC http://www.iec.ch
    Device Model Desc          
    : IEC 61966-2.1 Default RGB colour space - sRGB
    Viewing Cond Desc          
    : Reference Viewing Condition in IEC61966-2.1

    Thanks a lot for helping me to track this down. Looking at EXIF information with EXIF tool I get:
    Profile CMM Type           
    : Lino
    Profile Version            
    : 2.1.0
    Profile Class              
    : Display Device Profile
    Color Space Data           
    : RGB
    Profile Connection Space   
    : XYZ
    Profile Date Time          
    : 1998:02:09 06:49:00
    Profile File Signature     
    : acsp
    Primary Platform           
    : Microsoft Corporation
    CMM Flags                  
    : Not Embedded, Independent
    Device Manufacturer        
    : IEC
    Device Model               
    : sRGB
    Device Attributes          
    : Reflective, Glossy, Positive, Color
    Rendering Intent           
    : Perceptual
    Connection Space Illuminant
    : 0.9642 1 0.82491
    Profile Creator            
    : HP
    Profile ID                 
    : 0
    Profile Copyright          
    : Copyright (c) 1998 Hewlett-Packard Company
    Profile Description        
    : sRGB IEC61966-2.1
    Media White Point          
    : 0.95045 1 1.08905
    Media Black Point          
    : 0 0 0
    Red Matrix Column          
    : 0.43607 0.22249 0.01392
    Green Matrix Column        
    : 0.38515 0.71687 0.09708
    Blue Matrix Column         
    : 0.14307 0.06061 0.7141
    Device Mfg Desc            
    : IEC http://www.iec.ch
    Device Model Desc          
    : IEC 61966-2.1 Default RGB colour space - sRGB
    Viewing Cond Desc          
    : Reference Viewing Condition in IEC61966-2.1
    Viewing Cond Illuminant    
    : 19.6445 20.3718 16.8089
    Viewing Cond Surround      
    : 3.92889 4.07439 3.36179
    Viewing Cond Illuminant Type
    : D50
    Luminance                  
    : 76.03647 80 87.12462
    Measurement Observer       
    : CIE 1931
    Measurement Backing        
    : 0 0 0
    Measurement Geometry       
    : Unknown (0)
    Measurement Flare          
    : 0.999%
    Measurement Illuminant     
    : D65
    Technology                 
    : Cathode Ray Tube Display
    Red Tone Reproduction Curve
    : (Binary data 2060 bytes, use -b option to extract)
    Green Tone Reproduction Curve   : (Binary data 2060 bytes, use -b option to extract)
    Blue Tone Reproduction Curve
    : (Binary data 2060 bytes, use -b option to extract)
    XMP Toolkit                
    : Image::ExifTool 9.53
    Doesn't this include the profile? I use Metadata wrangler and creative commons and morgify as plugins, but these shouldn't interfere with the profile, should they? I also experimented with disabling the metadata wrangler (by clicking disable), but this did not have any effect.
    Thanks a lot!
    Stefan

  • Colour loss when exporting jpeg from Aperture 2.1

    I'm having a problem with colour loss in images i'm trying to export to a website.These are jpegs that have been worked on as RAW in Aperture,when exported to desktop and viewed in preview there is no colour loss at all, but when viewed on the site the colour saturation seems very dull and lack lustre - any ideas?? I have checked all the export presets (been going through all the posts to see if i could pickup anyone else finding the same) and they are all at the same settings. Thanks

    Go to the tools menu and then assign profile. Choose the display profile that your monitor is using. This will effectively stop preview from doing any translation to your monitor. See if this matches what you are seeing when you upload to the web. If it does then somewhere in your upload, process, web server chain the profile is being removed from the jpg or the browser you are using ignores color profiles (most windows browsers ignore image color profiles, that's why adobeRGB profile images look like crap to most windows users when viewed in Explorer)
    Ps if this is the case nothing is wrong you are just getting a preview of how most windows users will see your image on the web. Adjust to taste.
    RB
    Ps. Some good info and humor here:
    http://www.rwboyer.com/RBDesign/Blog/Entries/2008/4/16_Color_Management_and_Other_Stupid_InternetTricks.html
    Message was edited by: rwboyer

  • Export JPEGs from blobs (not using interMedia)

    I am storing JPEGs in blobs using the following stored procedure:
    CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE load_file (fname in varchar2, sp_id in varchar2, objectid in varchar2) IS
    src_file BFILE;
    dst_file BLOB;
    lgh_file BINARY_INTEGER;
    BEGIN
    src_file := bfilename('CTEMP', fname);
    -- blob reserve
    delete from image_table where spill_id = sp_id;
    INSERT INTO image_table (spill_id, rp_objectid, image) VALUES (sp_id,objectid,EMPTY_BLOB()) RETURNING image INTO dst_file;
    -- lock blob for input
    SELECT image INTO dst_file FROM image_table WHERE spill_id = sp_id FOR UPDATE;
    -- file open
    dbms_lob.fileopen(src_file, dbms_lob.file_readonly);
    -- length of file
    lgh_file := dbms_lob.getlength(src_file);
    -- input file
    dbms_lob.loadfromfile(dst_file, src_file, lgh_file);
    -- update table
    UPDATE image_table SET spill_id = sp_id, image = dst_file WHERE spill_id = sp_id;
    delete from image_table where image is null;
    -- Alle Files close
    dbms_lob.filecloseall;
    -- dbms_lob.fileclose(src_file);
    COMMIT;
    END load_file;
    I need to export the JPEGs back out to .JPG files. How can I do that?
    I am running Oracle 8.1.7 on Windows 2000.
    Thanks
    Dave

    Here's how I'm doing it. We're using the web, so I'm just referencing this procedure as part of an <IMG SRC="||get_empimg?empno_in='nnnnnnn'> tag in HTML.
    I'm storing our mime-type in the file, but you'd need to specify an "image/pjpeg" mimetype if you're not storing it on an image by image basis somewhere.
    create or replace procedure get_empimg(empno_in number) as
    vblob blob;
    buffer raw(32000);
    buffer_size integer := 32000;
    offset integer := 1;
    length number;
    mimetype varchar2(40);
    begin
    select emp_pic, emp_pic_mime into vblob, mimetype
    from web_emp_tbl
    where emp_no = empno_in;
    owa_util.mime_header(mimetype);
    length := dbms_lob.getlength(vblob);
    while offset < length loop
    dbms_lob.read(vblob,buffer_size,offset,buffer);
    htp.prn(utl_raw.cast_to_varchar2(buffer));
    offset := offset + buffer_size;
    end loop;
    end;

  • I saved my raw images as jpeg but they are too large to upload to photbox? I have 475 images.

    i

    KATIEBAILEY222 wrote:
    ....what should the pixel width be?  The trouble is I dont know what size these images are going to be printed.  I know they want some images enlarged onto canvas so the4y will need to be a very good quality?
    The workflow I was suggesting doesn't need you to specify pixel dimensions: you specify the print size, in inches or whatever measurement is required (but usually it is inches for prints), along with the appropriate ppi and LR will do the math for you and re-size the image so that the pixel dimensions fit those criteria. Doing that, even for reasonably large prints, should see the JPEG file sizes drop quite a bit I would imagine; I use a 16MP D7000, and when I use PhotoBox I often print at 12"x8" (300dpi), which usually means that LR has to do a fair bit of downsizing (maybe -25%) in order to fit that output size; even with a very detailed image (e.g. a landscape with a lot of fine detail such as tree branches, leaves, etc), I rarely go over 15MB with the JPEG (very different story for a TIFF of course!).
    What camera are you using here? I'm intrigued.
    I think it's rather unfortuate that you have no idea what sizes your photos will be printed at, and if I were you, I'd try to get that sorted out before uploading anything to PhotoBox. Speak with the couple, show them the pictures you have, and get them to select the sizes they want them to be printed at - maybe a default size for the majority might suffice, and then they can pick out the favourites for larger sizes/canvas prints, etc. Make a note of all the sizes PhotoBox offer and show them your list whilst they look through the photos on-screen. IMHO, if you're unsure of the final print size then you're going to be making compromises by going for a "generic" size and then relying on the PhotoBox staff to up/downsample the images on the fly, and you'll definetely be compromising the output sharpening that LR has to offer. I'd personally much rather send them a finished file that's ready to go, without the need for them to start messing around re-sizing it. But if you really can't establish an intended print size before uploading, then I think DJ_paige is spot-on with his advice - but it is a compromise.
    On a side note, if you've gone to the trouble of processing these images in LR, then do make sure you turn off their "auto-enhancement" option in your account preferences. This is switched on by default for new accounts, and it will ruin all you hard work developing/processing your photos. I speak from experience: I use them every once in a while for prints, and they once mistakenly overlooked my "don't use auto-enhancement" preference setting - the photos I got were junk. Happily, they admitted their mistake when I complained and sent me a fresh set within 24-hours.
    M

  • Exporting jpegs from llustrator for retina monitors

    I'm a web designer that designs my mockups in AI (yes, in AI and I love it) and then sends those native files over to my programmer when it gets time to code. We've been working this way for years and he's quite comfortable with that, so no issues there. My issues come when exporting the draft versions in jpeg for my clients to approve of the designs and go through revisions cycles from there.
    Up until five months ago, I was still using a pre-retina MBP but since upgrading, it's been a real nightmare seeing what those jpegs look like on screen and I can only image the face some of my clients will also be making when seeing those files.
    Now I know that AI cannot increase the image resolution without increasing the image dimension as well on export, and since I don't want to work in Photoshop (for many reasons related to workflow and time), what other options do I have? Does anyone have a workflow that I'm maybe missing out on?
    I generally create my mockups at 1920px, so naturally if I export them at 144dpi or whatever, it will double to pixel dimension and I don't want that - I'd like my clients to be able to view the actual size of the elements.
    Anything suggestions or is this a dead end as long as I use AI?

    Interesting. Well, when I think about it, I have had one client complain recently that a mockup for an HTML newsletter was very "low quality" (I always export at 100% quality and Art Optimized). I assumed he was on retina and thus that was why he was mentioning the quality.
    Either way, I will definitely look into it, perhaps directly with Apple, because this is not only draining in terms of time + energy but it is also driving me bonkers and defeats the purpose of even having a retina display in some sense...
    Thanks again.

  • Lightroom not exporting jpegs from a nikon d750?

    I know lightroom doesn't support the RAW files from the d750 but I understood it supports the jpeg files. However, when I go to export them it acts as if its doing it but it doesn't. I am doing everything as usual, but the picture does not come up when I am trying to export it to. I don't know what to do.

    However, when I go to export them it acts as if its doing it but it doesn't.
    Could you please explain this in detail? Exactly what do you see, exactly what happens? If there is an error message please quote the complete error message exactly as it appear, word-for-word, verbatim.
    Also, please let us know your export settings, perhaps a screen capture of the export dialog box File Sizing section. Thanks.

  • Stills exported back from Color are only 1 frame long

    I think I know the answer- I'm just hoping it's not true.
    Anyways. I have a 640x480 sequence of still images (tifs) set to music. I sent it to Color, and color corrected the stills. Then I rendered, and sent back to FCP. Only problem- the still images are only 1 frame long, and I can't change the duration in any way.
    Where did I go wrong, first of all? Should I have exported a SCQT of each photo first, and reedited using that? I have no motion of effects on that photo.
    Second of all, what's the best way of going from here. Do I need to regrade everything?
    Thanks for your help.

    No, the stills likely have a different colour profile associated with them, which should be taken care of in FCP... but as QT, maybe not... COLOR not differentiating or loading any Photoshop-type profiling.
    And, no, COLOR can't render tifs... It wants to render QT or dpx/cin.
    You should have been able to create a new COLOR project with your razored SCQT and done a File... Import Color Corrections from the former project, if you had exactly the same number and order of clips in the resulting sequence. Sort of a one-click solution to saving them all one at a time and loading them one at a time...
    jPo

  • Why does my PS work better than my Lightroom 5 exporting jpegs from raw files?

    So,
    I'm editing some raw files with Lightroom 5
    but when I export the jpg file, the result is terrible, it looks washed out, loses contrast, noise levels are higher than the edited file on suite
    However, if I do the same thing using camera raw through PsCS6, the exported jpg is perfect. Any reason for that to happen?
    've been reading a lot about color spaces, and I don't think is the case, since the same doesn't happen with photoshop.
    Also, it might be worth mentioning I'm exporting B&W images
    Thanks!

    ok
    just to illustrate the problem a little better, here's the actual difference
    this is what I have in Lightroom after editing:
    and here's what I get after exporting

  • Exporting JPEGs from InDesign CS4 Part 2

    It was suggested that I trash the InDesign preferences to correct a problem, that being, when I go to export a file as a JPEG, the dialog box does not come up for me to set the resolution, it simply creates the JPEG in 300 dpi. Trashing the preferences did not solve this problem. Any other suggestions?

    Try this forums.adobe.com/thread/526990

  • No exporting Jpegs from CS4?

    Is a windows bumpmap the only still image file I can export out of premiere CS4?
    CS3 could do jpegs I am pretty sure.
    I suppose it's not a big deal seeing as I can bring my .bmp files into photoshop and transcode them as jpegs....
    Why is CS4 so gimped on image exporting?
    thanks,
    Peter

    you can use AFTER EFFECTS if you want to export to PNG, BMP, JPG, TIFF, still image formats

Maybe you are looking for