Exported movie looks like crap

I exported a 1080p home movie from iMove HD and it looks like garbage, pixelated and everything. The way I did this was: Share > Export using QuickTime. Then in the Options area I clicked on Size and selected 1920 x 1080. After nearly 3 hours of export time, and a nearly 1 GB file size, it looked like crap.
When you shared as "Export using QuickTime", did you then select the Export option "Movie to QuickTime Movie" and if so what Settings, for example, Apple Intermediate Codec, H.264, MPEG-4 Video or other. Perhaps you selected the Export option "Movie to MPEG-4" - not "Movie to QuickTime Movie". We need more details as to your Export options and format settings - there are many to choose from. Just saying that you used "Export using QuickTime" doesn't provide enough information unfortunately.
One critical consideration when exporting using QuickTime is the _Data Rate_. If this is set too low (when the option is presented) you will get poor results - "crap" as you say! I would suggest starting at a minimum of 5000 kbits/sec (5 megabits per second) and moving up from there until you see the quality you are seeking.
Anyway, if you are still there, please provide more information about your settings - particularly regarding the format (codec) and data rate if possible.
John

Similar Messages

DVD MOVIE LOOKS LIKE CRAP ON HD TV

Help!
My DVD movies look horrible on my 46" Samsung 1080p LCD television. I have made DVD movies featuring still images directly in iDVD as well as from iPhoto to iMovie to iDVD.
Many thanks.
Kristina

Thanks for replying! I am making these movies with
high resolution still images. These same images look
amazing on the screen shown through iPhoto. Can I not
maintain this quality in a DVD movie with the same
images?????
No.
NTSC DVD images are 640x480 pixels AT BEST - this is only 0.3 megapixels. There is absolutely no way such DVD images will match the quality of multi-megapixel digital cameras.
See Preparing images for DVD slideshows at http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?path=iDVD/6.0/en/17.html for more information about using still images in iDVD slideshows.

FCP export sequence looks like crap, part 2.

Yesterday, some of the expert helpers asked me some questions I couldn't answer succinctly or even surely, so today I started up recording the answers.
Sequence>Settings:
frame size: 384x216
Aspect Ratio: custom (16:9)
pixel: square (anamorphic not checked)
Field dominatrix: none (whew)
29.97
Quicktime Video Settings:
compressor: photo jpeg
quality: 35%
I didn't set any of these. I opened the program, created a project, imported a folder full of photos for my time lapse sequence and dropped them into the timeline. I know that their actual size is much larger than 384x216. In fact they are 3216 × 2136 pixels.
However, I either get a frame size like the setting here (384x216), a large frame with crappy quality, or a tiny frame. Obviously, I am changing values trying to get to the original size or at least HD. Although, I am a little better than a monkey throwing poo at the screen, maybe not much...

adjust the setting to fit the screen.
this is what I've been trying to explain to you.
Remember that not working with images larger than they need to be is certainly a easy way to increase your productivity with Final Cut Pro.
And you can set how the images are scaled on import in the user preferences:
http://mediacommons.psu.edu/node/9267

DVDs I burn look like crap. Quality is horrible, but looks great in iMovie.

So I have a few movies I have put together in iMovie. One was imported using an HD camera, one from MiniDV. I have made edited movies of this footage, some adding text and what not, and some just raw footage. When I have exported these movies to YouTube or just Quicktime files to be emailed or posted on the web, they look great, like normal. When I burn them to DVD using iDVD, when played back on the regular TV or on another computer, the footage looks like crap, even though the animated menus look great.
I export the movie using the Media Browser, in Large format, and load them into iDVD that way. When I play the file in iDVD, it still looks great. The only time it looks bad is when the DVD is burned. The footage looks as though it has a "slow shutter" effect on it. The quality is crap, and the footage looks like it's gone through generation loss, uploaded to YouTube then re-burned to a DVD.
Why is this happening?

I also have this problem and am trying to find a solution.
I shoot 1080i on a sony hd cam (minidv), then import and edit in FC Express using the apple intermediate codec 1080i60 and export to QT as a NON-independent file using same settings. The final movie file is 1920x1080 which is dragged into iDVD '08 and burned at "professional quality".
When I burn to dvd and play on my flatscreen in an sd dvd player, it looks like crap, even down to large pixelations around the text. I know not to expect HD but the SD should look better than this.
Now, when I play this in my macbook's dvd player, it looks better than the tv. But this is played at actual size which is only about 1/4 of my screen whose resolution is 1920x1200. I will select the "actual size" mode on the dvd controls. So why is iDVD making a 1080 movie to a ~400 movie?
ANy suggestions are appreciated and if anyone knows if DVD Studio Pro will solve this.
Aloha:
-Charlie-

How do I make multiple movies look like one?

I created a demo of 136 slides with mostly screencaps and one
small flash animation. The final published flash file is
approximately 30MB. When the demo is run on multiple computers, the
CPU utilization rises up to almost 100%, this makes the demo run
very slowly on most computers. I was advised to cut my captivate
movie in half ( in slides)... however even then the CPU utilization
is quite high. How can I break my demo into multiple linked movies
(to bring down the file size) but still have it play smoothly
without it stopping to load after each new movie? How do I make
multiple movies look like one?
Thank you.

Would it work to make the navigation of the page go to the
next movie?

Best way to make a logo that doesn't look like crap on big screens/phones?

I am working on creating a simple text logo that fits in a 110x300 pixel space for a website. The thing is, at this small resolution, it looks pretty crappy using Photoshop. So, I tried Illustrator because I believe you can save vectors with it (I'm new to all this). From what I know, vectors don't lose quality when zoomed in (or on big screens). However, I have no clue what I'm doing. I tried to "save for web" a logo as a png 24, and it still looks like crap. Am I doing something wrong, or is it just not possible to save a high quality image at that size?

So, there is no way to save a vector image for a website?
SVG. Flash. HTML5 canvas objects (JavaScript).
That was what SVG was really made for, but it never found widespread use.
That's a pretty broad-based (and misleading) dismissal.
Use of SVG is increasing, not declining, and practically all current browsers now support it. So with such a statement, you would need to quantify "widespread". Of course SVG (like Flash and canvas) is and probably always will be less common than raster formats, but that's always been true of vector-based graphics in general, even in print. Less "widespread" use of something superior is an advantage to those who employ it. Sites which employ it effectively can be more engaging and dynamic than the far more "widespread" ones which don't. That's the whole point.
Fonts are also vector-based graphics and are certainly pretty "widespread" in use on the web. (Consider the potential of this in the light of things like font embedding and GoogleFonts.)
From what I know, vectors don't lose quality when zoomed in (or on big screens).
Stallone, your question is really more a matter of the platforms / browsers you are targeting. You have to be aware of what kind of zooming you are talking about and what is happening on what you're referring to as "big screens."
For example, you can easily launch Inkscape, create an SVG graphic consisting entirely of vector paths, and include it in a static web page. It will be displayed and rasterized on-the-fly by the local machine, as vector graphics are intended to do. But now, who or what is going to "zoom" it? Are you talking about mere screen "magnification" by the sight impaired in which the whole page is zoomed? Are you talking about pinch zooming on mobile devices in which the whole page is zoomed? Are you talking about projecting on the conference room screen in which nothing is actually zoomed (re-rasterized) at all?
Everything that anybody views on a computer monitor is a raster image, because the monitor itself is a raster imaging device. That's even true of vector paths you draw and view in programs like Illustrator. Vector-based graphics get re-rasterized on the fly--so long as the system in which they are being printed/viewed is capable of supporting that. The question boils down to when the rasterization occurs and what is doing the zooming.
Historically, web browsers don't do that. The "intelligence" (programming) involved in rasterizing vector paths on the fly has to be effectively "embedded" in the graphic or in an add-on program (browser plug in) which performs the re-rasterization locally on the viewer's machine. That's why Flash requires a plug-in and SVG has to be viewed in a browser that understands the XML upon which it's based (which most current browsers nowadays do) and HTML5 Canvas has to viewed in browsers which can run its JavaScript-like programming (which is still developing).
All this is constantly changing as mobile devices and platforms and ebooks proliferate, and all this is why designing for the web always entails some amount of experimentation on the platform(s) for which you are developing.
It's a big subject; not something you can get a crash course on in a forum like this.
JET

Flash Looks Like Crap

I republished the swf as stated to me in another section and
it looked like crap. The file looks like a layer is missing or
something, I started from scratch(as in how it was origianlly in
the template). Any quick tips on how to edit flash templates? Edit
as far as changint the text on buttons and in the "logo panel"
area.
[Started another topic because it's more of a design question
now]

if you just want to change the text on the buttons, go to
your Library (Ctrl-L if you don't have it open) and double click
the button you want to edit. once you do, you will be able to edit
most aspects of the button, including the text. hope this is what
you're asking help on....and...hope it helps.

My mpeg-4 looks like crap

i was uploading to vimeo, exporting from a final cut pro hd 4.5 file using quicktime 7.6.6 conversion, here's the link to the settings i used:
http://vimeo.com/help/compression
any advice would be much appreciated!

any advice would be much appreciated!
How about posting a link to the QT v7.6.6 output file so we can see what the actual quality of your source content looked like and what results were actually achieved using your targeted settings.

Exported Movie looks good in Quicktime, but not in any other Player?

I Have noticed that the text that I have exported from After Effects were looking jagged in windows media and Kmplayer. At first I thought it was my render settings that were making it look low quality, but then I found that when played in Quicktime the movie look high rez. only problem is that quick time is extremely laggy when I open up my movies. Why is this happening?

Huh? That's simply hardware scaling. Your movie is not being viewed at 100% size.
Mylenium

Idvd 09 - preview looks awsome, burned dvd looks like crap on a stick!

What is going on with idvd???
1. I use a Panasonic HD digital camcorder that saves video in 1080p x 720p and looks spectacular veiwed directly from camcorder to TV.
2. I import the video files into imovie 09 and quality still looks great. (I realize my monitor won't display video at it's highest resolution.)
3. I edit the video and as the text and transitions are added the playback gets choppy and starts to freeze. -Whatever!
4. I "share" the final vid to media browser.
5. I create a DVD menu in iDVD 09 and import the video from the media/movies panel.
Preview looks great, runs fairly smooth. ok!
6. I burn to a DVD-R using the Best Performance setting.
7. I place the burned DVD into my dvd player and....
It now looks like I am projecting the video onto a brick wall with the focus out of adjustment. The video is not very smooth, with jittery motion! And the resolution mimics that of an old Sega Game Gear view screen! Text has video noise distortion all around it. Probably would look better on youtube! AND....If I select "Scene selection" option and choose a scene from the middle of the movie, it just plays from the start anyway!
So much for HD! So much for deadlines! Now I just want to know why I "upgraded" to iLife 09 and a new-found crappy quality!! "Hollywood style movies" - MY BUTT!!!!!
Please help!!!!!!
Message was edited by: Jerred Best
Message was edited by: Jerred Best

Hi Jerred,
Welcome to apple discussions. I have some bad news and some good news for you. I'll start with the bad news.
iDVD does Not support burning High Def DVD (even though iMovie will in fact edit HD). That's the bad news.
The good news is that there are third party options available to you at a relatively low cost (under $120).
See here: http://www.roxio.com/
OK. I told you the bad news and the good news right? Well here's the frosting on the cake:
You DON'T need a BD burner if you're doing this on the cheap (like most of us). A standard DVD burner such as your Mac's superdrive will do fine.
See here: http://www.macvideo.tv/dvd-authoring/features/index.cfm?articleId=112361
Btw, you do want to make certain your camcorder/ camera is listed below prior to proceeding with the above info:
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3290?viewlocale=en_US
Hope the above info helps but if not just come on back.
Disclaimer: Apple does not necessarily endorse any suggestions, solutions, or third-party software / products that may be mentioned in this topic. Apple encourages you to first seek a solution at Apple Support. The following links are provided as is, with no guarantee of the effectiveness or reliability of the information. Apple does not guarantee that these links will be maintained or functional at any given time. Use the information above at your own discretion.
Message was edited by: SDMacuser

QUIKE TIME FROM FILE .MOV looks like tracking is messed up???????

HELLO I really need help with this i just started using quick time so i could view my videos file .mov i could'nt view before but now using quick time when i play it the sound is normal but the video it self it like jumps around and has lines through parts of it. It looks like when a vcr tape needs the tracking ajusted so its hard to view if anyone can help with this i would be so great full....Thanks so much

I have asked that your post be moved to the QuickTime Forum, where you will receive informed attention. Please read the information at the top of this Forum, it is only for comments and feedback about Discussions, not technical questions.

Exports suddenly look like double-widescreen (in FCE)

Please, help. After many successful 16:9 (SD) exports, they suddenly look like a 16:9 w/black bars inside a 16:9 area that already has black bars (looks like a double-widescreen effect). Hopefully, this is just a setting that needs to be reset somehow. Thank you for any help. ---TMP-MAC

Problem solved. Thanks to all for considering this one. Just needed to place a check-mark in "Anamorphic" (in sequence properties) BEFORE I captured any widescreen video. Now the canvas will look right (solid gray bars - one set only), and my exports look right (one black bar at top and one at bottom, and subjects are not flattened between them). Never saw anything like this in any instructions anywhere, unfortunately.

Plugging Macbook Pro i7 into external displays looks like crap.

I have a rather confusing problem with my Macbook Pro. I went out and bought a Samsung 27" display. I am running a generic no-name adapter from the mini port to a HDMI plug into the display. The quality was AWFUL- as in basically unusable. I returned the monitor and came back a few weeks later with the laptop to the store. I spent about an hour plugging the laptop into various monitors throughout the store. Almost all of the monitors- including smaller 24" monitors- looked like crud also except for the upper end models from HP and of course- the $1,000 model from Apple. I wound up buying a 27" HP 2710m monitor. It looked "ok" in the store. I work as a graphic designer so I'm very picky about details. Upon opening a Photoshop doc I could see that things like gradients, shadows, and text all looked funky and wrong. Thus again- the monitor I bought looks like #$@!.
What's weird is that if I take a look at the display settings when its not plugged into a monitor there is a huge amount to choose from. When its plugged into any monitor I've tried- except of course the super expensive Apple display- about half of those setting become unavailble and I'm basically stuck with using what appears to be TV settings ( 1080P) and so on.
I tested the new monitor on a Mac Tower and it seems to do fine. But then again- it looks like crud with the Laptop. The Mac tower uses non-apple 24" displays and they look great. I even plugged the laptop into one of these 24" displays currently used for the tower and again- SAME thing!
So basically I've got a $2,000 laptop that appears to ONLY work with an Apple monitor. Is there something stupid I'm simply not getting here or what? I realize those apple displays are a much higher pixel density, but still- the generic 24" displays work with the Mac tower but NOT with the laptop.

Welcome to Apple Discussions!
If you have an i7, it can't be running 10.5.4 reliably. At minimum it can run 10.6.3. So that might be part of the problem if you managed to to load an older operating system on the Mac than the Mac itself can handle. Your My Settings or posted OS link has 10.5.4, even though you are using an i7. If you meant to select 10.6.4, pardon me.
Generic adapters are usually not as reliable as quality adapters, but also if you have 1080p display, I recommend checking your progressive setting under Apple menu -> System Preferences -> Displays Options.
I'm assuming you tried the same cables on the desktop as the notebook. If you don't have a mini-Displayport connection on the desktop to test with, you can't rule out the cables.
http://www.macsales.com/ offers several adapters you can use with your notebook for HDMI. You might want to check with them, or find a non-generic adapter.

I have created several templates and they look great in live view, however they look like crap when actually tried to set up a webpage based on the template. Help!

I have created sevedral templates and they look great in the live view, however they look like plain HTML text when I try to create a webpage based on the template. HELP!

This forum is about the Cloud as a delivery process, not about using individual programs
If you start at the Forums Index https://forums.adobe.com/welcome
You will be able to select a forum for the specific Adobe product(s) you use
Click the "down arrow" symbol on the right (where it says All communities) to open the drop down list and scroll

I-movie. I made a movie for a party of my daughters using photos and music. The video looks great on my Mac but when I burned a dvd and watched it on several t.v.s it looked like crap. The pictures looked blurry because of the movement of transitions?

Does anyone have ideas to sharpen the video i made. Looks good on computer but not on tv. the transition between pictures blurs the images. Is it my tv that causes this?

Does anyone have ideas to sharpen the video i made. Looks good on computer but not on tv. the transition between pictures blurs the images. Is it my tv that causes this?

Exported movie looks like crap

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for