Exporting clickdummy as "html + images" creates too many gifs

Hi, I created a prototype in Fireworks, exported as "HTML and Images". There are multiple pages and a few slices. My problem now is the images folder. It's huge. There are thousands of gifs. Is this normal? I wanted to provide this prototype via an online link, but you mostly see the images loading from top to bottom when opening any page. It's annoying. Working offline from desktop is fine of course.
Do I have to reduce the number of sclices so that there are fewer gifs in the image folder? I would have to cick off some hover states... or is there any other way to reduce the number of images the page is build of?
Thanks for any help and advice!
Mari

OK, thanks, that already helped me. But unfortunately I didn't manage to create these html-text slices. There are just green solid boxes where I can enter html text but I dont know how to transfer my different text areas in combination with images to html + image slices. Do I have to slice up the whole page?
After trying and studying the article you mentioned above I exported as Css and Images and now my page consists of html text and some images, looks nice and is edidable in Dreamweaver. But with this method I loose all the hover functionality. In which direction should I work on?
A export as Css and Images and try to insert the hover and swap-image functionality manually in Dreamweaver or
B export as Html and Images and try to learn how to add html text slices?
Thanks again!
Mari

Similar Messages

Portal creates too many database sessions. fix doesn't work!!

Oracle Database 9i, Application Server 9iAS,
Operating System SUSE Linux 7.2
CPU - Athlon 1400
Ram - 1GB
There is a modification for the http server that aims to eliminate a problem on unix that causes the database to create too many sessions. The script can be found at
http://portalstudio.oracle.com/servlet/page?_pageid=1787&_dad=ops&_schema=OPSTUDIO
However the script fails to work. The http server is on port 80 with the redirect on port 7778. However going to http://myhost/pls/ results in a server error - connection refused. Is it possible that there may be an error in the script.
Thanks in anticipation

ok so my sound is ok now I can check that off of the list... I just looked around and found some external USB speakers that work just right. My built in computer speakers are just not the best quality.
As for the microphone, I still haven't been able to find out what is causing it to not work. I notice that it isn't actually broken since if I make a really loud noise right next to the input it will register a little but only a little bit.
$ arecord -L
null
Discard all samples (playback) or generate zero samples (capture)
pulse
PulseAudio Sound Server
default
Default ALSA Output (currently PulseAudio Sound Server)
sysdefault:CARD=Intel
HDA Intel, ALC269 Analog
Default Audio Device
front:CARD=Intel,DEV=0
HDA Intel, ALC269 Analog
Front speakers
surround40:CARD=Intel,DEV=0
HDA Intel, ALC269 Analog
4.0 Surround output to Front and Rear speakers
surround41:CARD=Intel,DEV=0
HDA Intel, ALC269 Analog
4.1 Surround output to Front, Rear and Subwoofer speakers
surround50:CARD=Intel,DEV=0
HDA Intel, ALC269 Analog
5.0 Surround output to Front, Center and Rear speakers
surround51:CARD=Intel,DEV=0
HDA Intel, ALC269 Analog
5.1 Surround output to Front, Center, Rear and Subwoofer speakers
surround71:CARD=Intel,DEV=0
HDA Intel, ALC269 Analog
7.1 Surround output to Front, Center, Side, Rear and Woofer speakers
$
here is some additional information about my sound. Also, when I open alsamixer, I find that when I go to "select sound card"(F6) I see default and HDA Intel. If the default is pulseaudio, then is it possible that pulseaudio is causing the problem?

Clipboard export failed because the image is too wide to save as a PICT

Am I the only one who keeps getting this message in a new window,
"Clipboard export failed because the image is too wide to save as a PICT"
while working in Photoshop?
I know little about a PICT file, except that it's some kind of file.
Seems to pop up out of nowhere after I've been doing some copy/pasting.
The really annoying part: it never shows up while I'm still working in PS,
it's only after I click onto a folder or start working in another application.
THEN the message won't let me do anything with the folder or application,
but instead returns me to the PS screen for a few more seconds, then fades out.
It's only after the fade-out that I can click on a folder or use
another application.
I have plenty of RAM (50%) and backup drive space assigned to PS, and
again, this does not happen while still in a PS screen. Using Cache Level 6.

While I haven't seen that particular message, I have had the "clipboard is too large to export" message. What you need to do is go to the Photoshop preferences and tell it to NOT export the clipboard. You should be able to find it the General section of preferences, just UNcheck the box in front of "Export Clipboard"--of course, if you copy something in Photoshop that you want to paste into another program, you'll have to re-check it. But bear in mind the limits of Clipboard.
Francine
Francine
Schwieder

Will Analyze create too many redo logs ??

DB : 10gR2
Hello Folks,
Is analyze process creates too many redo log files ?? Is their any other valid option other than no log ?

I guess that's also going to create too many log switches as it's part of DDLHUH?
REDO log switches result from DML.
If you are obsessed with LOG switches, then you need to use LOGMINER to observe the the relative per centage of changed data is from DBMS_STATS
when compared to normal DML activity.
I seriously doubt that DBMS_STATS has any significant impact to redo log switches.

Creat too many instance when writing an oracle database

Hi
I want to write Oracle database with database toolkits;
but..i found there are too many instance or called session（exceed the upper limit) created when the program running . that makes the Orace server stop responding
Is there anything i need to modify？
Attachments:
Oracle DB.vi ‏36 KB

Frankly I have never seen this problem, but then I make a point of never using the database connectivity toolkit. Assuming a Windows platform, Windows implements something called connection pooling so when you "close" a connection the OS inserts it into a pool so If you ask for another connection it doesn't actually open a new one it just gives you back a reference to one of the ones you "closed" before.
What OS are you running on?
What version of Oracle?
Is the instance of Oracle local or on another computer?
How are you communicating with Oracle (odbc, oledb, etc)?
Mike...
Certified Professional Instructor
Certified LabVIEW Architect
LabVIEW Champion
"... after all, He's not a tame lion..."
Be thinking ahead and mark your dance card for NI Week 2015 now: TS 6139 - Object Oriented First Steps

IWeb re-creates too many pages

I understand the difference between "Publish" and "Publish All", but what I don't understand is why iWeb re-creates so many pages when I "Publish". If I work on three pages and then simply "Publish", the darn thing spends five minutes re-creating those three and a half-dozen other pages I didn't touch. Not the end of the world, but kind of annoying.
Is there something I can do to eliminate this, or can someone at least help me understand why I am sitting and watching iWeb spin it's wheels for so long?
Thanks,
Bryan

The strange thing is that:
Even when the new page you are working on is in another site in iWeb the publish feature goes through some long process. While no files in the other sites are changed they are 'checked one by one,' making the publish process more tedious than it has to be.
Since the nav bar is a part of the html code all pages in the site you add a page to must be modified. If you don't wish this to happen uncheck the checkboxes in the Inspector:
1. Select the page and Open the Inspector
2. Click on the page icon.
3. uncheck 'include this page in the navigation menu.' and 'display navigation menu'
iWeb makes it very easy to create your own nav menu. Just type in some text and select it. Then open the Inspector and click on the hyperlink icon. (Arrow icon) and select 'enable as hyperlink' From the pull down menu choose one of your pages in your site.
Kurt

IPhones w ActiveSync creating too many connections on mail server

Over the past two days, I have started getting 503 errors, indicating too many connections. When I went to look at active connections, I noticed that the vast majority were from the iPhones that connect using ActiveSync. Just in the 45 minutes since I cleared all active connections, my iPhone has created 14 active connections. When you multiply that by the eight iPhones we have at this company the number jumps to 112. It is easy to see why the 503 error is getting generated by the end of the business day. It is as though the iPhone is unable to let go of an active connection, and just starts a new one. This only seems to be happening since the iPhone 3.0 update. Is anyone else experiencing similar issues?

Yes - I'm having a very similar problem on our server. But in this case the user has a very large mailbox - and imap processes are spawned but never die unless I go in and manually kill them.

Photoshop CS6 creates too many History States withing 1 stroke

I'm on MAC OSX 10.6.8, Photoshop CS6, using a Wacom Cintiq 12".
Too often Photoshop remembers way too many History states within one pen stroke. In previous versions I don't remember this behaviour. Previously, each stroke, no matter how long, was registered as only one History state, until I raised the pen from the tablet. Now, totally sporadically without any obvious rule, Photoshop decides to remember even 100 history states within only one stroke.
Although this is sometimes useful, if you work on really long strokes, but mostly it's highly disturbing, as after using just one tool to paint only one little circle, I loose all my other, much more important History states.
Can somebody explain to me why???

Noel Carboni wrote:
Done with a mouse I get exactly one "Brush Tool" state in the history and one "Use brush" state recorded in an action.
Could it be that your tablet driver is actually delivering information to Photoshop that makes it think you're lifting the stylus and putting it down many times per stroke?
-Noel
Hmmm... could be, but I don't know how to test it, as it happens occasionally... I don't experience it in other software, but I will keep an eye on that.

Memory usage Adobe Photoshop Elements 9 - How many images are too many?

My wife and I are having a discussion about the memory allocation of Adobe PSE 9.
We run both of our profiles logged in on a 27" iMac top end from May, 2010, with 12 GB of RAM.
She had a number of pictures open (let's say 20 - 25) that she was working on editing. Trying to shut the program down or work within it, the spinning wheel of death made a cameo appearance and brought the system to a crawl.
I ran Activity Monitor and it said that she had 746 MB of memory free out of 7.39 GB active and 11.27 GB used. With each image I closed, I gained an additional 5 - 7 MB of free memory.
Once I force quit PSE 9, that number jumped to nearly 2.5 GB free.
For those with experience using PSE 9, can you give me an indication:
How many images do you have open that you're working with at the same time?
For those people with more Mac OS X experience, would having 750 MB free out of 12 GB reduce the computer to a crawl?
Thanks in advance.

As a general rule of thumb (some will disagree with me) if your machine has about 500MB of Free RAM or less this will slow down the computer significantly. Also as a general rule you can never have too much RAM. One nice thing about your machine is it can be upgraded up to as much as 32GB of RAM however 8GB chips are EXTREMELY expensive right now and currently only OWC sells a kit. You can upgrade to 16GB for a lot less, whether you need it or not no one here can say for sure. I would continue to keep an eye on Activity Monitor and keep my first sentence in the back of your mind.
Roger

SDDM 3.1 PROD: Engineer to Relational creates too many new objects

After upgrading to DM 3.1 production I am seeing many dublicates of my relational tables. It seems that when I perform "Engineer to Relational", some of the tables are recreated even though they already existed in the relational model.
Currently, I have the following tables in my relational model:
PARTIES
PARTIESv1
PARTIESv2
PARTIESv3
PARTIESv4
PARTIESv5
PARTIESv1-v5 have a created date of Februrary 15 or later, so they have all be created after my upgrade to DM 3.1 production.
Is this a known bug, and will it be fixed by the upcoming patch?
Regards,
Marc de Oliveira

Marc,
I have not been able to reproduce this problem.
I assume that the problem occurred on a model you had migrated from an earlier release? If so, was the migration from 3.0 or from 3.1 EA1, EA2 or EA3? And was this where the model was initially created, or had it been migrated previous to this latest migration?
I assume that the Entities had been Engineered to Relational prior to the migration?
Is it happening to all your Tables? If not, are there any obvious similarities between the Tables that have the problem?
Any other information that might help us reproduce this problem would be appreciated. Do you use any special options in your Engineer operation?
David

Airports are creating too many separate networks, how to fix?

Here's a picture of my current setup. I have 1 Airport extreme that creates a 2ghz and 5ghz network. It travels via ethernet to a airtport express 2G that creates 2ghz and 5ghz networks of the same name as the Airport etreme.
Within that whole setup I have 2 Airport express' extending the 2ghz network which I believe is creating my problem.....
With this whole setup some sections of my home get these results:
It's quite annoying especially when streaming airplay because my iphone or such device will jump back and forth between the two networks making the music stream choppy.
How would I make both the networks merge as one? Is there a way to extend a network using ethernet as the connection instead of wifi??

Oh wow, I feel like a fool, how did i not catch that >.<
Also one last question, should I allow the 2nd gen express' network to be extended whil I'm already allowing the airport extreme as well?
Thanks I'm pretty sure you fixed this

C main pgm creates too many local refs

Okay I give up ... I have a main program in C which calls methods in a helper class to read and write JMS queues. Right now it is leaking a local reference somewhere in the routine below, and I can't figure out where. Each time it calls this routine it seems to create one local reference which is not freed, eventually resulting in lots of "JNI local ref creation exceeded capacity" messages. (I assume that the local references are not cleaned up automatically because my main() function is in C rather than Java ... I haven't seen this addressed anywhere though.)
Anyway, the routine attached below is what my program calls each time through its loop. There is nothing on the queue for this test, so the return value of the method is always NULL.
Any help would be appreciated ...
Roy Goodman
Code follows ...
static JNIEnv *env;
#define CHECK_EXCEPTION() \
    if ((*env)->ExceptionOccurred(env)) { \
          (*env)->ExceptionDescribe(env); \
          logError( "Java exception encountered - see log file" ); \
          (*env)->ExceptionClear(env); \
          return JAVA_EXCEPTION; \
int receiveWait( const char *queueName, const char *url, int wait, ppMsg msg )
static jmethodID mid;
static jclass cls = NULL;
jstring receivedMsg;
jstring jQueueName;
jstring jUrl;
const char *tmp;
if ( env == NULL )
    return JAVA_EXCEPTION;
if ( cls == NULL )
    jclass lCls = NULL;
    lCls = ( *env )->FindClass( env, QUEUE_HELPER );
    CHECK_EXCEPTION( );
    cls = ( *env )->NewGlobalRef( env, lCls );
    ( *env )->DeleteLocalRef( env, lCls );
    mid = ( *env )->GetStaticMethodID( env, cls, "receive",
                           "(Ljava/lang/String;Ljava/lang/String;I)Ljava/lang/String;" );
    CHECK_EXCEPTION( );
jQueueName = ( *env )->NewStringUTF( env, queueName );
jUrl = ( *env )->NewStringUTF( env, url );
receivedMsg =
    ( *env )->CallStaticObjectMethod( env, cls, mid, jQueueName, jUrl,
                          ( jint ) wait );
( *env )->DeleteLocalRef( env, jQueueName );
( *env )->DeleteLocalRef( env, jUrl );
CHECK_EXCEPTION( );
if ( receivedMsg != NULL )
    int len = ( *env )->GetStringUTFLength( env, receivedMsg );
    tmp = ( *env )->GetStringUTFChars( env, receivedMsg, 0 );
    if ( tmp != NULL && *tmp != '\0' )
      *msg = malloc( len+1 );
      memcpy( *msg, tmp, len+1 );
    else
      *msg = NULL;
else
    *msg = NULL;
if ( receivedMsg != NULL )
    ( *env )->ReleaseStringUTFChars( env, receivedMsg, tmp );
( *env )->DeleteLocalRef( env, receivedMsg );
return OK;
}

After further investigation, it seems that the references are being created to the QUEUE_HELPER class. Could this be a problem in CallStaticObjectMethod() where it creates a local reference that it doesn't delete?
Thanks again,
Roy Goodman

FindByPK creates too many instances

Hi all,
When using JBoss (I don't know other servers behavior) the findByPrimaryKey method creates a "home instance".
I think that JBoss need a "home instance" for finder methods and it could create only one to do that, but, in fact, it creates a new instance for each call and doesn't reuse it.
For example:
Integer pk = new Integer(1);
First findByPrimaryKey(pk): 2 instances created (Home instance and Bean instance)
Secound findByPrimaryKey(pk): 1 instance created (Home instance)
Third findByPrimaryKey(pk): 1 instance created (Home instance)
The ejbLoad method is called only on the first call (it's my configuration).
Any idea?
Thank you,
Denis.

Hi Denis,
Check your deployment descriptor - maybe you've
mistyped the remote interface for the home interface.
If I'm not mistaken, finder methods should return
remote, not home interfaces.
DimitarI think Denis meant a new HomeImpl (or whatever it's called) instance is created each time in the container to receive the home.findByPrimaryKey() request.
As such requests are stateless, one would expect the container to direct several of them (at least when they are serial and not in parallel) to only one instance of HomeImpl.
But it's a container decision. The container is free to instantiate a pool of HomeImpl, or one HomeImpl for each request,...
As far as EntityImpl instances go, it's not surprising that only one instance is created and that ejbLoad() is called only once, as long as the instance created first is still alive and active.
Not surprising but not obvious either : the container would be free to create several instances representing the same entity, provided it ensures transactionality (that seems one way of ensuring isolation of concurrent container-managed transactions on the same entity).
So in general one shouldn't rely on the instantiation of the Java object representing the implementation of a Home or a Remote as it may vary per container.
Now I think Denis' concern may be : does such an approach of creating a HomeImpl instance each time scale?

Can't reimport images (created in 3.2.4) from an external hard drive into 3.3.2

Using MBP OS 10.7.4 and have previously exported "Project as Library" images created in Aperture 3.2.4 to a LaCie 1 TB external drive.
Subsequently upgraded Aperture to 3.3.2 and performed the full "upgrade library" process and saw its full progress to completion on the screen. Then I needed to re-import back into 3.3.2 the project listed above and got this message
Initially I tried bring the external drive's library back by File>Import>Library but got the same message as above but only with a different first-line heading.
Then I tried to simply open the previously exported library by clicking on it in the window of the external hard drive icon and got the above pasted-in message.
Does this snafu mean I can never again access all of my many libraries storied on external drives ? I'm not able to figure out how to make the older libraries compatible with 3.3.2 via the unable-to-activate upgrade process apparently necesary to do so.
Anyone's help is most appreciated. Thank you
Bob

Léonie
Recht herzlichen Dank für die Vorschläge, aber........
1. The LaCie drive was bought at my local Apple store, already formatted for Mac. Also I've used it for over a year with both my current MBP with 10.7.4 as well as, and at the same time, with a previous          MBP still on 10.6.8. The drive has worked with both MBP on other activities.
2. Concerning the link to the First Aid Tools you supplied below, last week I repaired both the permissions and the database on the MBP into which I'm now trying to re-import the older Project as Library,                     which had been previously exported to the LaCie. That export to the LaCie was done from the newer 10.7.4 MBP into which I'm now trying to re-import it but before I moved to Safari 6.0 ( which                     shouldn't make a difference I don't think ) and before I went to Aperture 3.3.2 from 3.2.4. Would that mean I need to re-repair Aperture again ?
To make sure the LaCie drive itself wasn't corrupted somehow, I just began a re-import of the Project on the LaCie drive to the older MBP (10.6.8) and it began to process smoothly. I did stop that import because that's not the unit I want to use to work on the Project; I just tried it to see if 3.2.4 could pull the Project from the LaCie drive into the older laptop.   It could.   But that didn't help me with getting it into the newer MBP 10.7.4.
What the Error message said, which I had pasted into my original positing, was that the Project/Library on the external drive needed to be upgraded before I could re-imported into the desired MBP. Any ideas on how to upgrade it on the external drive itself ? If I can't get it off the external drive into Aperture it seems impossible to upgrade it. Dadurch sitze ich jetzt in der Klemme !
Thank you for your help. I appreciate it.
Bob

Please organize osx launchpad icons in CS6 collection(there are too many adobe icons)

Adobe applications create too many icons in launchpad on osx. Is there a way to automate organising them in a more elegant fashion? Launchpad gets full of red adobe icons(2 pages of them) especially if you have master collection installed. Please put them all in one folder or something.

Thanks for your input here. We will look into it to see if there is an improvement we can make in the future.
Pattie

Exporting clickdummy as "html + images" creates too many gifs

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for