Exporting objects of the same version? ODI-11.1.1.5

Hi Gurus,
Is it possible to export all the objects (Interface, Model, Package, etc..) that belong to the same version? I am using Data Integrator version 11.1.1.5.
Thanks in advance.

How do you define - "the same version".
You probably will have to be creative with the use of markers and then use them to export your objects.

Similar Messages

Exporting two remote objects on the same port

Hi,
I would like to export two remote objects on the same host, same port and bind them with different service names.
There is no problem when I do that from the same Java program.
But when I export and bind an object from a Java program 1, I cannot do the same with the second (and similar) Java program 2. This is the stack trace of my Exception:
java.rmi.server.ExportException: Port already in use: 50040; nested exception is:
     java.net.BindException: Address already in use: JVM_Bind
     at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport.listen(TCPTransport.java:243)
     at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport.exportObject(TCPTransport.java:178)
     at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPEndpoint.exportObject(TCPEndpoint.java:382)
     at sun.rmi.transport.LiveRef.exportObject(LiveRef.java:116)
     at sun.rmi.server.UnicastServerRef.exportObject(UnicastServerRef.java:145)
     at sun.rmi.server.UnicastServerRef.exportObject(UnicastServerRef.java:129)
     at java.rmi.server.UnicastRemoteObject.exportObject(UnicastRemoteObject.java:275)
     at java.rmi.server.UnicastRemoteObject.exportObject(UnicastRemoteObject.java:178)
     at java.rmi.server.UnicastRemoteObject.<init>(UnicastRemoteObject.java:75)Can some one help please

It should work in any version of Java as long as the server socket factories are null or equal according to Object.equals() or its override in the SSF.equals() method if any. Which needs to be present and needs to take the form:
public boolean equals(Object object)
return object != null && object.getClass() == this.getClass();
}with further tests if the server socket factories have additional state.

View objects referencing the same entity

The behaviour occurs in every version of jdeveloper ADF BC i have tried so far (10g, 11g).
I have 2 updatable view objects referencing the same entity object. When i create a new record using the first view object and before commiting the data to the database i navigate to the second
view object. Suprisingly the second view object is populated with the same data that is posted on the first view object. It seems like both view objects are referencing the same entity object instance.
Is any way to overcome this strange behaviour.
Thanks

As Timo says think of the EO as a record cache. If you had 700 VOs all based on the same EO, it would be ideal to store the same record(s) 700 times in the midtier as it would consume vasts amount of memory. Thus the EO cache.
If you do want to separate the VOs, you've 3 options:
1) Use separate EOs for each VO (not ideal)
2) Expose each VO under their own root level Application Module - a separate EO cache instance for each VO will be created at runtime - however you need to be careful between the VO/EO pairs, you don't update the same record, as you'll get record locks/contention
3) If you're using task flows in 11g, use the Always Begin New Transaction option for each screen/fragment for each VO. This is the equivalent of 2 but from the task flow level - however again you need to be careful on record locks.
CM.

Export & Import in the same DataBase

Hi,
I'm trying to export and import in the same DataBase but in different User/Tablespace, the imp procces create the objects in the same Tablespace of the export. What can I do to create a copy of a schema in the same database?
Thanks. JEA

I am not sure if I am reading your question correctly, Create a new user in your database.
Use the command line (DOS) command 'exp80 username/password@hoststring'
there are a number of parameters here, you can find their meanings online if you search for 'export ORACLE command line parameters', I don't know what your requirements are but you have to set the FILE parameter with the name of the file you wish to store your output in(ext should be .dmp).
To import, use imp80 and log on as the new user you created then the following parameters need to be set:
File= your file name
SHOW = n
IGNORE = n
GRANTS = y
ROWS = y
FROMUSER = old user name
TOUSER = new user name
TABLES = *
I hope this helps.
SE

How to select the objects sharing the same appearance in the same artboard?

I have several artboards in the file and I want to select all the objects having the drop shadow effect in the artboards I'm working. No matter I use the "Select" in the menu or the "Select similar objects" button in the control panel, it selects all the objects having the same appearance in the entire canvas, not only the one in the artboard I'm working. Any means or there's nothing can do?
Please help!

J_Lai wrote:
yes, that's work and I also tried to lock the objects in another artboard in order to select the objects in the working artboard only. However, I think that's stupid to get it done in this way and Adobe should improve this in the next version.
This is easy enough to state but if you think this is wrong then you should perhaps suggest a way this feature could be manifested.
For instance to you this should only effect the current artboard but there will come along another user who will say hey wait a minute I need to select all the drop shadowed objects and remove them now I have to go from atboard to artboard.
If you see what I mean, II found out that when I find something that is seemingly stupid that in fact there is a reason for it and there has to be a way to describe how it can be improved without breaking what you already have.
For instance you want it to just effect the current artboard but then there will be those who also want it if it even touches the artboard and those who will want it on a range of atboards and those who will actually want AI to know which artboards you want even without you specifying which artboards. That last one sounds illogical but that is the nature of the problem and the human conditions.
So though I agree this can be improved perhaps you have an idea how this can work for everyone?

I had the same version of firefox before. but dueto a problem i uninstalled it. now i installed it again and i want to recover my old passwords.

i had the same version of firefox. but after adding yahoo messenger to my computer, it added a toolbar in my firefox and i was unable to remove it even after whatever i did. now, i got the same firefox and i very barely want all my lost passwords. is there any way for it? (i had a master password and i remember it)

Did you remove your personal data when you previously uninstalled Firefox?
If you did then your Firefox profile folder with your personal data including saved passwords was removed.<br />
If you kept your personal data then Firefox should have picked up that profile automatically.
See also:
*https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Recovering+important+data+from+an+old+profile
*http://kb.mozillazine.org/Transferring_data_to_a_new_profile_-_Firefox

How can I open multiple instances of the same version of FF?

I understand that if I have multiple profiles, I can run different versions of FF side-by-side (like 3.6 and 4).
However, what I'm interested in is how I can launch multiple instances of the same version of FF (4, for instance) using the same profile. In other words, I want to be able to double-click the desktop icon for FF, and open a new instance, and keep doing that as many times as I want. I don't want to have a different icon and profile for each instance (too much overhead to keep a dozen+ profiles in sync).
I can always launch one FF window instance, and then keep clicking ctrl+N to launch new instances from inside it, which they all share the same profile (as I want). So, basically, I want to be able to do that from my desktop icon, rather than by having to do it with the keyboard ctrl+N sequence.

But I don't understand why whatever Firefox does when you click ctrl+N can't also be done (with some sort of command-line switch) from a desktop icon?
In other words, I clearly can create many FF instances (even if they are the same FF.exe process) by doing ctrl+n a bunch of times. Why then can't this behavior be done from a desktop icon with some parameters?
As far as I know, FF is the only browser that doesn't directly allow multiple browser instances from desktop icons. IE, Chrome, Safari, Opera, etc... all let me launch a new instance (even if they are all single process and the instances are shared within the process).

Why can't I restore the same version IOS that's on my phone?

My iPhone 4s has apps on it that are not iOS 6x or even 7x compatible. iTunes/Apple won't let me restore the same version of iOS 5 that is currently on my phone that won't boot up. I have no options anymore except to pay.
1. I can pay a developer to migrate the app I use for work to iOS7 and eventually run into the same problem later and pay AGAIN.
2. I can ditch Apple (because there is no logical reason for this) and pay to go over to a Google phone and pay to migrate my app over to android but have the peace of mind that I won't be forced to do what android wants me to do anymore.
I bought an iPhone, an iPhone 3G, an iPhone 3GS and an iPhone 4S. I don't like using the latest and greatest because I only really care about doing what *I* want to do with *MY* phone. I don't like being told I can't have what I've been using for the past 2 years because Apple has changed a policy or something.
Is Apple doing ANYTHING for people like me or are we just screwed? Can anyone explain why Apple would disallow reinstallation of an iOS i've been using for years now?

if you're saying the default function of 'restore' has always been update to latest for your device you'd all be correct.. but that's not what i'm talking about. shift+click restore and you'll be prompted to browse for your firmware. since the dawn of the iphone (ask anyone that's actually used this feature) you have always been able to use this feature to install same-version ios as to what version is on the device. in the past it was more open, allowing you to update to any version above the one you're on, but that was taken away back in IOS3.. for example.
i'm sure for the average user who has no idea what version ios they use or want this would be completely transparent so i don't really blame you for not knowing or using this feature. for others like me this is a big deal. hopefully someone else who is on the same page as i am will chime in..
i think it's a little crazy to force your users to only use the specific version ios you want them to. have you tried ios7 on an ipad2? hello lag. there are more reasons than mine to want to be able to control what software runs on YOUR hardware.. think about it.

I have iTunes on an XP service pack 3 computer, recently purchased a Windows 7 Home preimum laptop. How do I move my music from the XP to the laptop? do I need to have the same version of iTunes on both computers?

I have used iTunes on a desk top with XP service pack 3 and have quite a bit of music on that computer. Recently purchased laptop with windows Premium Home and am now laoding iTunes on the laptop. How do I copy my music to the laptop and in the future how do I sync the music files on the two computers? Do I need the same version of itunes on both computers?

Quit iTunes on new computer.
Copy the entire /Music/iTunes/ folder from old computer to /My Music/ on new computer.
Launch iTunes.
Thant is all you need to do.

Plugins that i know are compatible in version 7.0.1 are reporting as not compatible when i try and install then in the same version running inside of VMware.

Greetings ..
I am trying to run Firefox inside of VMware Workstation V8 in Widows 7 and Fusion V4 in Mac OS X 10.7.2.
I first tried to restore a working profile backup of Firefox made with FEBE in windows inside of VMWARE, when I load Firefox more that half of the plugins that were working in Windows and OS X natively, are reporting as not compatible with this (V7.0.1) Firefox and will not update to a working version, as in many cases they are the latest version anyway.
Also it is inconsistent, as i have tried several times to install Firefox and restore the profile and each time it is not all the same plugins that are disabled and reporting as incompatible.
I have also tried to do a clean install of Firefox and going to the website and installing the plugins directly, and while i have not tried all of the disabled plugins, I am unable to install plugins that i am currently using in the same version of Firefox outside of VMware that are working and or can be installed when I am not running Firefox inside of VMware.

If there are problems with updating then best is to download the full version and uninstall the currently installed version and delete the Firefox program folder to remove any leftover files.
Download a fresh Firefox copy and save the file to the desktop.
* Firefox 8.0.x: http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all.html
Uninstall your current Firefox version if possible.
*Do NOT remove personal data when you uninstall the current version or you lose your bookmarks and other data in the profile folder.
Remove the Firefox program folder before installing that newly downloaded copy of the Firefox installer.
*It is important to delete the Firefox program folder to remove all the files and make sure that there are no problems with files that were leftover after uninstalling.
Your bookmarks and other profile data are stored elsewhere in the Firefox Profile Folder and won't be affected by a reinstall, but make sure that you do not select to remove personal data if you uninstall Firefox.
*http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_folder_-_Firefox
*http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_backup
*http://kb.mozillazine.org/Standard_diagnostic_-_Firefox#Clean_reinstall

RE: multiple named objects with the same name andinterface

David,
First I will start by saying that this can be done by using named anchored
objects and registering them yourself in the name service. There is
documentation on how to do this. And by default you will get most of the
behavior you desire. When you do a lookup in the name service (BindObject
method) it will first look in the local partition and see if there is a
local copy and give you that copy. By anchoring the object and manually
registering it in the name service you are programmatically creating your
own SO without defining it as such in the development environment. BTW in
response to your item number 1. This should be the case there as well. If
your "mobile" object is in the same partition where the service object he is
calling resides, you should get a handle to the local instance of the
service object.
Here is the catch, if you make a bind object call and there is no local copy
you will get a handle to a remote copy but you can not be sure which one!
It end ups as more or less a random selection. Off the top of my head and
without going to the doc, I am pretty sure that when you register an
anchored object you can not limit it's visibility to "User".
Sean
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[<a href="mailto:[email protected]">mailto:[email protected]]On</a> Behalf Of David Foote
Sent: Monday, June 22, 1998 4:51 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: multiple named objects with the same name and interface
All,
More than once, I have wished that Forte allowed you to place named
objects with the same name in more than one partition. There are two
situations in which this seems desirable:
1) Objects that are not distributed, but are mobile (passed by value to
remote objects), cannot safely reference a Service Object unless it has
environment visibility, but this forces the overhead of a remote method
call when it might not otherwise be necessary. If it were possible to
place a copy of the same Service Object (with user visibility) in each
partition, the overhead of a remote method call could be avoided. This
would only be useful for a service object whose state could be safely
replicated.
2) My second scenario also involves mobile objects referencing a Service
Object, but this time I would like the behavior of the called Service
Object to differ with the partition from which it is called.
This could be accomplished by placing Service Objects with the same name
and the same interface in each partition, but varying the implementation
with the partition.
Does anyone have any thoughts about why this would be a good thing or a
bad thing?
David N. Foote
Consultant
Get Your Private, Free Email at <a href=
"http://www.hotmail.com">http://www.hotmail.com</a>
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:<a href=
"http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/">http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/</a>>
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:<a href=
"http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/">http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/</a>>

David,
First I will start by saying that this can be done by using named anchored
objects and registering them yourself in the name service. There is
documentation on how to do this. And by default you will get most of the
behavior you desire. When you do a lookup in the name service (BindObject
method) it will first look in the local partition and see if there is a
local copy and give you that copy. By anchoring the object and manually
registering it in the name service you are programmatically creating your
own SO without defining it as such in the development environment. BTW in
response to your item number 1. This should be the case there as well. If
your "mobile" object is in the same partition where the service object he is
calling resides, you should get a handle to the local instance of the
service object.
Here is the catch, if you make a bind object call and there is no local copy
you will get a handle to a remote copy but you can not be sure which one!
It end ups as more or less a random selection. Off the top of my head and
without going to the doc, I am pretty sure that when you register an
anchored object you can not limit it's visibility to "User".
Sean
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[<a href="mailto:[email protected]">mailto:[email protected]]On</a> Behalf Of David Foote
Sent: Monday, June 22, 1998 4:51 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: multiple named objects with the same name and interface
All,
More than once, I have wished that Forte allowed you to place named
objects with the same name in more than one partition. There are two
situations in which this seems desirable:
1) Objects that are not distributed, but are mobile (passed by value to
remote objects), cannot safely reference a Service Object unless it has
environment visibility, but this forces the overhead of a remote method
call when it might not otherwise be necessary. If it were possible to
place a copy of the same Service Object (with user visibility) in each
partition, the overhead of a remote method call could be avoided. This
would only be useful for a service object whose state could be safely
replicated.
2) My second scenario also involves mobile objects referencing a Service
Object, but this time I would like the behavior of the called Service
Object to differ with the partition from which it is called.
This could be accomplished by placing Service Objects with the same name
and the same interface in each partition, but varying the implementation
with the partition.
Does anyone have any thoughts about why this would be a good thing or a
bad thing?
David N. Foote
Consultant
Get Your Private, Free Email at <a href=
"http://www.hotmail.com">http://www.hotmail.com</a>
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:<a href=
"http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/">http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/</a>>
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:<a href=
"http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/">http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/</a>>

How to rotate and translate an object at the same time??

Hi, I have a problem with rotation and translation of an object at the same time. I wrote a behovior class for my object (a cylinder). When some conditions are true the cylinder is added to a robot arm. Then it is translated so that the cylinder would be very close to the arm (looks like the robot is holding it). And now the behavior should also rotate the cylinder because the angle is 0 and it should be 90. I can translate the object or I can rotate the object but when I'm trying to do it at the same time (I want to combine rotation and translation) it doesn't work.
Could anyone help me, please :)

You can used to Matrix3f
This object is a rotation and translate matrix
for example:
private void componerTransformada(){
Quat4f rot = new Quat4f((float) this.getRotacionSobreX(),(float) this.getRotacionSobreY(),
(float) this.getRotacionSobreZ(),1.0f);
Vector3f tras = new Vector3f(-4.0f,-4.0f,(-1)*this.getDistanciaDeLaCamara());
this.setTransformacion(new Transform3D(new Matrix4f(rot, tras, 1.0f)));
Quat4f is a matrix of ratation
vector3f is a direction vector
Transform3d is building with Quat4f and Vector3f.
That is work i use this to situe the view of point.
good locky

SharePoint 365 Deploy App -- "another App with the same version and product ID."

Hi all
When I want to deploy App I got this message:
2>Active Deployment Configuration: Deploy App for SharePoint
2> Skipping deployment step because a pre-deployment command is not specified.
2> Skipping the uninstall step because the app for SharePoint is not installed on the server.
2> Install app for SharePoint:
2> Uploading the app for SharePoint...
2>Error occurred in deployment step 'Install app for SharePoint': The provided App differs from another App with the same version and product ID.
If the App exist why it doesn't uninstall it. And also its not possible to Retract:
Skipping the uninstall step because the app for SharePoint is not installed on the server.
I solved my problem by changing ProductID manually but I don't want to make the server with dirty small apps.
Any idea?
Thanks

Hi,
Check the Site URL in project properties to which the app is installed.
You have to choose the right path first where the app is installed and then Build>Retract.
Then change the path to new one and try build. It looks like you are trying to retract from wrong Site URL.
Thanks
Jashandeep K

Sharing objects in the same package (context)

Hi,
I need a small example or API invocations which shows object sharing beetween two applets in the same package.
Thanks.

Look at the JavaPurse sample. You'll see the record, ParameterFile, and CyclicFile are shared objects in the same context.

I purchased a new laptop. I'm trying to find the same version of Acrobat Pro 9.5 I have on my old laptop to install on my new computer. Any help?

I purchased a new laptop. I'm trying to find the same version of Acrobat Pro 9.5 I have on my old laptop to install on my new computer. Any help?

I'm using an iMac with the newest OS X Yosemite. I tried to reinstall Creative Cloud, removed all the programs. But I still get the 'old' 2014 version with the Lionhead, not the Sunglasses (october 2014) with interactive libraries. I use Adobe iPad apps, for instance Adobe Brush, Adobe Shape and Adobe Color and it's so great to have all the things you make with these apps in your Illustrator & Photoshop libraries. Somehow it worked om my laptop, but not om my home computer.

Exporting objects of the same version? ODI-11.1.1.5

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for