Exposing MBeans to JRocket mission control

HI,
We could see the MBeans of following types in JRockit Mission Control which is connected to external wls.
JMImplementation
bea.jrockit.management
com.sun.management
java.lang
java.util.logging
oracle.javatools.cache
jrockit.synthetic.
But we would like to get the alert when the wls server Health status is in Warning status.
This information is available in com.bea.* MBeans which we could not see in remotely connected JRockit Mission Control.
HOw can we expose com.bea.* MBeans to the externally connected JRockit Mission Control?
Thanks,
Surender.

See the discussion in the following thread: Custom JMX MBeans not showing JRMC under Weblogic 10.3.1

Similar Messages

Exposing MBeans to JRocket mission control(Remotely connected)

HI,
We could see the MBeans of following types in JRockit Mission Control which is connected to external wls.
JMImplementation
bea.jrockit.management
com.sun.management
java.lang
java.util.logging
oracle.javatools.cache
jrockit.synthetic.
But we would like to get the alert when the wls server Health status is in Warning status.
This information is available in com.bea.* MBeans which we could not see in remotely connected JRockit Mission Control.
HOw can we expose com.bea.* MBeans to the externally connected JRockit Mission Control?
Thanks,
Surender.

You need to connect to the relevant WLS MBeanServer tree -- not just the platform JDK MBeanServer as you are doing.
I'd suggest a quick scan through this to get a picture of how JMX is exposed with WLS:
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E12839_01/web.1111/e13728/toc.htm
-steve-

1 OSX Lion Mission Control vs Snow Leopard Expose can't we combine the two (by leaving older Expose options inside) and get Apple back to leaping forward again?

So I am a web/software developer and I am having major beef with OSX Lion's Mission Control. While I think Mission Control and Application Windows are interesting additions to the multi-tasking nature and scheme of the OS, removing the older Expose Spaces and All Windows is a huge mistake. Couldn't Apple have just left all of the old stuff in? Then the system would be complete. As pretty as Mission Control and Application Windows is, the older Snow Leopard Spaces and Expose moved much faster and tamed all of my apps in a very efficient way.
Here is why Mission Control is not as fast as Spaces and Expose:....
1. With Spaces all of the desktops and their connected monitors were consolidated to one monitor in which you can easily see everything going on from a birds eye view. You cloud easily drag open windows between them freely and even swap spaces. This was huge because you could see everything. You could even activate All Windows over Spaces and see everything..Mission Control will group everything but you can't move programs across desktops unless it's the main desktop to the little desktop. Nor can you move windows across monitors. This is frustrating. Also the desktop are split to their respective monitor so I no longer have a birds-eye key-map access.
2. All Windows is so necessary and slick. Mission Control or Application Windows can't quite keep up. If I have a cluttered desktop and hit all windows, I can get any window at any time no matter how buried it is. Application Windows is useful but only applies to the focused application…but what if it's buried? I have to activate mission control first, select one of the windows from the program group, then activate Application Windows to get to that window. Also if there are many windows open for an application, Mission Control cannot replace All Windows because they stack and you can't quite tell which of the windows you want is accessible in that stack.
The bottom line is, put both of them together! Keep the old functionality as an option, because truth be told, the old way of doing things is still considerably faster under heavy work loads. I would use the Snow Leopard expose features more often. There is still room for Application Windows and Mission Control, but even after re-training myself I feel I'm moving at 70% of the multitasking speed that I used to move at before using Snow Leopard Expose. I mean this legitimately, I develop using multiple OS's along with video chat and instead of being a leap forward, Lion is a step backward and that just isn't like apple, everything Apple has done has been leaps and bounds forward. Let's leap forward and not only have all the sweet new features that Lion offers, but combine with the productive features that really moved and maybe just integrate into Lion's style. Bottle that and you have something sweeter than Yoohoo.

I completely agree with airbnboy. I used to be able to quick organised different windows within the same app to different spaces (now "desktops" for no apparent reason). This worked very smoothly in expose/spaces. I'd use one gesture to get to spaces, then another for expose, and I'd have all my windows in all spaces visible.
Now, I can't even see all of my windows in specific to one desktop! The best I can do is double scroll to see *some parts* of the windows on a desktop. So now, selecting a window for a specifc app is huge pain.
Worse than this, on moving windows from a desktop to another in, Mission Control will change the ordering of the stacks (per app, not the windows in the stacks). Umm, what is the possible benefit there?
So, now there is no use of spatial memory - e.g. Window X for App Y was in the top left of all my windows in the top left space, and I want to move it now. It's no longer possible to see all app windows in a specific "desktop", and much more effort is required to move windows around.
Great, well done Apple. Can we please, please have Expose and Spaces back as an option? Or at the very least, some way to view all windows for a specifc app on a specific desktop - and by "view", I mean see the whole window, not just a tiny indicator of the window, or a slightly expanded stack that may not give enough context.
The only reason I "upgraded" to Lion was to get XCode 4.2.

Mission Control/ Expose issue with stacked pages hard to view. Please help

Is it just me or is there a real issue with the way Mission Control/ Expose displays these stacked windows? For instance, I had about 6 finder windows open, showing 6 different folders on my Desktop. If I then use Mission Control to quickly access a particular folder, it displays all my finder windows together, stacked up on one another and this makes it almost impossible to view which particular folder i want. It doesnt have the folder names displayed so this is seriuosly time consuming now. Is this something im doing wrong, or is it a valid issue?
many thanks

If you are just trying to see all the Finder windows which are available, just invoke App expose. I use a 4 finger swipe down. If you are in finder, just swipe. If you are in another application, hover your mouse over the Finder icon in the dock and swipe. All the windows are easy to see.
(You can, of course, do this with any application, not just the Finder.)
charlie

Displaying minimized windows in expose and/or Mission Control

OK all of you big fans of the SL way of Expose'. I miss being able to see all of those minimized windows as well.
I have read in a couple places that this is new setup is not a bug, it was removed from Expose'/Mission Control in Lion. I also read that if Apple receives enough requests/complaints about the loss of that feature that they might possibly bring it back!
SO....
Go to the OS X feedback page http://www.apple.com/feedback/macosx.html and let Apple know that you want it back! Remember don't jump all over them, be polite and to the point and let them know that you would like the feature back!
I hope this works!
If you want, once you submit a request, let us all know that you are joining in the strugle to bring all the windows back to expose' !

D0GG wrote:
You don't use Expose? Is that why you have been going to thread after thread of users that are missing this feature and posting the same answer?
Not sure why you are doing this... It completely baffles me.
I remember making one other post along these lines, for the same reason. If there are more maybe you could post the links "going to thread after thread" to verify your accusatory comments.
You are the first one who actually gave any kind of clarification, and I appreciate that. It will help me from wasting my time on exposé queries.
That is Expose displaying all the windows of your SELECTED app. On Snow Leopard you had the option to view ALL the windows of ALL the currently running apps, including the finder.
You find that baffling, I think that is your problem D0GG

Turn back the app history within Expose/Mission Control, Turn back the app history within Expose/Mission Control

For some wierd reason & can't remember if I toyed with the settings under System Preferences but it looks like when I swipe with four fingers down within an app for expose I don't get to see all the previously viewed items with the app. Any suggestions?

I agree with everything you said about full screen apps, mission control and launchpad. For apps that made sense to run full screen, they already could under SL. Launchpad is totally unnecessary and Mission Control is a mere shadow of Expose and Spaces.
However, I feel you have not given due credit to Spaces. The point of Spaces is to let one organise logical desktops for different tasks, not just a way to reduce the number of windows on display. For example, I have a Space for software development where I run Xcode and the iPhone simulator, a Firefox window showing perhaps documentation or some other websites pertaining to software development, a Finder window that is opened in the folder with my design docs. I have another Space where I have the remote login sessions, yet another Space with another Firefox window where I do general surfing and emailing. I can switch between these spaces using a keyboard shortcut, which is much quicker than having to lift my hand off the keyboard, move it over to the mouse, move the mouse pointer over the Dock, find the app and click on it, only to find that it has switched to the wrong window of the app.
Without Spaces, organisation of my desktop is disrupted each time I want to switch task, whereas Spaces allows me to drop everything I am doing, go and do something completely different for a while and go back to my exact previous environment. I have a 27" iMac so am not short of screen space but I use Spaces extensively. BTW, switching Spaces using a keyboard shortcut is a lot faster on SL than the equivalent on Lion, thanks to the gratuitous screen animation of the latter.

Customize Mission Control vs. Expose

In expose I used to be able to customize the corners and gestures that I could use to get to the desktop or see all windows. How do I do the same in mission control?
What I wan to do is have three finger downward swipe show all windows and three fingers upward swipe show the desktop. But it seems the gestures are locked?
How can this be that Lion is less customizable than Snow Leopard?

I'm no expert on Lion but here's the behavior I see with Mission Control that makes it really different from Expose. With Mission Control, if you don't assign an application to a workspace then when you enter Mission Control you see all the spaces along the top and all the applications below. If a application has more than one open window, its windows are stacked together and you can look at the windows stacked below by click dragging. Click and you select that window and leave Mission Control. Click drag and the window comes to the front so you can see it better but you'll stay in Mission Control.
The limitation (if you want to call it that) is that if you have assigned an application to a specific workspace, if you didn't enter from that workspace, you don't see it or its windows in MC (unless you move to its workspace). This has led me to assign far fewer programs to specific windows than I used to. So, for example, since I assigned my word processing programs to space 2, if I enter MC from space 3 I won't see my Pages documents. Even so, I can use a gesure or or control arrow to move to Space to and move one of my Pages documents into another window. (I chose to park my writing applications in a space because they are apps they I most often want to move windows to rather than move their windows to another space.)
This limitation has also led me to temporarily park programs in a space but then unpark them when I've completed a project. In Leopard and Snow Leopard I had lots of programs permanently parked. MC is a different animal that needs a slightly different way of working but for me it has changed my workflow without damaging it.
Does this help?

OS X Lion's Mission Control is missing key features of Expose

Who else agrees that Apple has missed the mark with Mission Control? It's a seemingly good idea to categorize windows by application in Mission Control, but there is now no way of seeing ALL open windows at once. For instance, I usually have multiple windows open from a single appkication, such as Safari. In Mission Control, I can only view my Safari windows stacked on top of one another and have to click each window individually to see it. Apple, PLEASE bring back the all open windows view that Expose used to have. It is one if the most crucial tools for window management. Until then, I'm going back to Snow Leopard.
Who else agrees that Mission Control should show all open windows, without stacking them on top of one another?

I think some perhaps do not realize that many people miss the actual spaces in combination with exposé. It was quite powerful for those of us that need to constantly access and shift around multiple apps. While I understand there are many users that have adopted the pad mentality, I for one still use a Wacom tablet for everything—including browsing the web—as do many other professionals. Mission Control is a catastrophe for this, and generally for everything within my workflow. Photoshop follows every desktop I move to, which is super annoying, and is a prime example of how much of a joke mission control really is (blame adobe whatever...still horrible). But more importantly, I can drag an app to a desktop, but NOT from a desktop into my current desktop. This is fatal to productivity when working in programming, 3D, compositing, design, etc..
I am pleased to hear there could be some evolution taking place with Exposé; regardless of my personal views. Anything is better than what we have now. A touch pad dominant environment may be the wave of OSX future to many, but to me it's only one step closer to soley using Linux based operating systems.
Sorry for the long post... Hopefully a few of you that have never worked in this way can see how it goes beyond just Exposé from certain perspectives... RIP spaces . Exposé is only partially as good without them imho. Open spaces > then exposé while in spaces mode > move one app to one space, another to another, put anything exactly where you want it, all without closing out—meanwhile being able to see literally every document/app perfectly clear.

How do I change Mission Control back to Expose?

Mission control is useless. It groups windows from the same program together, making it impossible to see windows in the back, and on top of it it requires multiple steps to get a specific window to a program.
Expose is a step up from mission control - it lays EVERY window out in front of you so you can quickly select the one you're looking for.
I want Expose back. And not this crappy new expose. I never have enough windows open to make that even remotely useful.

Steve Smith11 wrote:
Don't have time to be mouseing around and clicking windows.... The point of Exposé was to reduce time hunting for what you're looking for....
Then tell Apple
http://www.apple.com/feedback/macosx.html
or go back to Snow Leopard. Exposè has gone. Get over it or go back.
https://discussions.apple.com/thread/3525616

App Expose and Mission Control in Lion

Several people have posted, confused by how App Expose works. I hope to clarify the function of App Expose and Mission Control.
APP EXPOSE
App Expose in Lion works differently than Expose did in Snow Leopard.
App Expose is intended to show all open windows from the same application.
Expose used to show all open windows from all applications.
To test App Expose in Lion, open two (or more) separate windows in Safari (or any application). Three-finger swipe down on your trackpad and App Expose will reveal your two (or more) open Safari windows.
MISSION CONRTOL
In Lion, the most similar thing to the old Expose (from Snow Leopard) is the new Mission Control.
To test Mission Control, open several applications. Three-finger swipe up on your trackpad and Mission Control will reveal all open applications, dashboard and spaces. If you have multiple windows open in a single applications (like three separate Safari windows, for example), MIssion Control groups those same-app windows together.

Mission Control ended years of divergent attempts to manage windows and widgets, consolidating Expose, Dashboard, and Spaces into a new Mac interface.

Mission Control and Expose Problems

All of a sudden my mission control gestures have stopped working. Three fingers up did expose all the windows, but not all the desktops. After restarting my computer, the three fingers up or down doesn't work at all, and the launchpad doesn't make the background disappear as it used to. I tried multiple ways of fixing the issue, including turning all the gestures off and restarting and turning them all back on. Can anyone help me fix this? It is a real pain. Also, three fingers side to side still switches between the desktops.

Four fingers does bring me to mission control, but there is no bar at the top that shows the desktops that I have made. Also, sometimes it glitches and all the windows disappear for a few seconds until I go back and forth across all the desktops a few times. I remember when I went into launchpad before the windows I was working on would fade away, and they don't do that anymore either.

Mavericks: Grid for Mission control & Expose?

Hello everyone,
I was wondering if someone could help me with the following issue: I am trying to find something (a setting, a patch, a utility?) that would lock the placement of the app previews in Exposé or within one space in mission control (not the order of spaces, for which I know there's a setting available). The reason I'm asking that is this: as we all know when you have multiple apps open in one desktop (space) and you invoke the mission control it creates a very handy way to see all the running apps and quickly switch to the one you need (or several windows of one app in exposé). HOWEVER, once you switch to another app and open the mission control again, the order of the windows is sometimes rearranged (always rearranged in exposé). This prevents me from quickly switching to apps just by remembering where their previews were located in the mission control/exposé overview the last time around and I spend additional time looking for the one I need. I searched all over internet but nobody seems to have asked this question before. Maybe there's such a simple solution that I don't see it? Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks,
Rob

Not quite clear on the question and can't offer a solution. However, are you familiar with the TAB + COMMAND shortcut to switch through open applications? I have always found this easier than Mission Control, and may be beneficial based on this statement:
The reason I'm asking that is this: as we all know when you have multiple apps open in one desktop (space) and you invoke the mission control it creates a very handy way to see all the running apps and quickly switch to the one you need (or several windows of one app in exposé).
Thanks,
Rob
Secrets of the Command-Tab Mac Application Switcher
How to Switch Between Open Apps in OS X

Problem to get Mission Control 3.0.1 running with JBoss 4.2.2GA

Hello,
I'm using JRockit R27.04 to run JBoss 4.2.2GA with the following VM parameters:
-Xmanagement:ssl=false,authenticate=false,port=7091,autodiscovery=true -Djavax.management.builder.initial=org.jboss.system.server.jmx.MBeanServerBuilderImpl -Djboss.platform.mbeanserver
It's working fine but when I try to use any feature of Mission Control (console, memleak, JRA, ...) pointing to JBoss, I get a ClassNotFoundException:
Could not open Memory Leak Detector for (1.6) org.jboss.Main (4460).
java.rmi.UnmarshalException: error unmarshalling return; nested exception is:
     java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.apache.xerces.dom.DeferredElementImpl (no security manager: RMI class loader disabled)
java.rmi.UnmarshalException: error unmarshalling return; nested exception is:
     java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.apache.xerces.dom.DeferredElementImpl (no security manager: RMI class loader disabled)
     at sun.rmi.server.UnicastRef.invoke(UnicastRef.java:178)
     at com.sun.jmx.remote.internal.PRef.invoke(Unknown Source)
     at javax.management.remote.rmi.RMIConnectionImpl_Stub.getMBeanInfo(Unknown Source)
     at javax.management.remote.rmi.RMIConnector$RemoteMBeanServerConnection.getMBeanInfo(RMIConnector.java:1037)
     at com.jrockit.console.rjmx.RJMXConnection.getMBeanInfos(RJMXConnection.java:279)
     at com.jrockit.console.rjmx.RJMXConnection.getMBeanInfos(RJMXConnection.java:314)
     at com.jrockit.console.rjmx.RJMXConnectorModel.initializeAttributeInfos(RJMXConnectorModel.java:294)
     at com.jrockit.console.rjmx.RJMXConnectorModel.<init>(RJMXConnectorModel.java:99)
     at com.jrockit.console.rjmx.RJMXConnectorModel.<init>(RJMXConnectorModel.java:113)
     at com.jrockit.mc.memleak.ui.RjmxMemleakEditorInput.connect(Unknown Source)
     at com.jrockit.mc.memleak.ui.actions.StartMemleak$1.preConnect(Unknown Source)
     at com.jrockit.mc.browser.utils.PreConnectJob.run(PreConnectJob.java:73)
     at org.eclipse.core.internal.jobs.Worker.run(Worker.java:58)
Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.apache.xerces.dom.DeferredElementImpl (no security manager: RMI class loader disabled)
     at sun.rmi.server.LoaderHandler.loadClass(LoaderHandler.java:375)
     at sun.rmi.server.LoaderHandler.loadClass(LoaderHandler.java:165)
     at java.rmi.server.RMIClassLoader$2.loadClass(RMIClassLoader.java:620)
     at java.rmi.server.RMIClassLoader.loadClass(RMIClassLoader.java:247)
     at sun.rmi.server.MarshalInputStream.resolveClass(MarshalInputStream.java:197)
     at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readNonProxyDesc(ObjectInputStream.java:1575)
     at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readClassDesc(ObjectInputStream.java:1496)
     at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readOrdinaryObject(ObjectInputStream.java:1732)
     at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject0(ObjectInputStream.java:1329)
     at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject(ObjectInputStream.java:351)
     at java.util.HashMap.readObject(HashMap.java:1157)
     at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor4.invoke(Unknown Source)
     at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
     at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
     at java.io.ObjectStreamClass.invokeReadObject(ObjectStreamClass.java:974)
     at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readSerialData(ObjectInputStream.java:1846)
     at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readOrdinaryObject(ObjectInputStream.java:1753)
     at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject0(ObjectInputStream.java:1329)
     at java.io.ObjectInputStream.access$300(ObjectInputStream.java:188)
     at java.io.ObjectInputStream$GetFieldImpl.readFields(ObjectInputStream.java:2107)
     at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readFields(ObjectInputStream.java:519)
     at javax.management.modelmbean.DescriptorSupport.readObject(DescriptorSupport.java:1270)
     at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor3.invoke(Unknown Source)
     at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
     at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
     at java.io.ObjectStreamClass.invokeReadObject(ObjectStreamClass.java:974)
     at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readSerialData(ObjectInputStream.java:1846)
     at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readOrdinaryObject(ObjectInputStream.java:1753)
     at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject0(ObjectInputStream.java:1329)
     at java.io.ObjectInputStream.defaultReadFields(ObjectInputStream.java:1945)
     at java.io.ObjectInputStream.defaultReadObject(ObjectInputStream.java:480)
     at javax.management.modelmbean.ModelMBeanAttributeInfo.readObject(ModelMBeanAttributeInfo.java:524)
     at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor5.invoke(Unknown Source)
     at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
     at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
     at java.io.ObjectStreamClass.invokeReadObject(ObjectStreamClass.java:974)
     at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readSerialData(ObjectInputStream.java:1846)
     at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readOrdinaryObject(ObjectInputStream.java:1753)
     at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject0(ObjectInputStream.java:1329)
     at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readArray(ObjectInputStream.java:1667)
     at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject0(ObjectInputStream.java:1323)
     at java.io.ObjectInputStream.defaultReadFields(ObjectInputStream.java:1945)
     at java.io.ObjectInputStream.defaultReadObject(ObjectInputStream.java:480)
     at javax.management.MBeanInfo.readObject(MBeanInfo.java:669)
     at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor9.invoke(Unknown Source)
     at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
     at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
     at java.io.ObjectStreamClass.invokeReadObject(ObjectStreamClass.java:974)
     at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readSerialData(ObjectInputStream.java:1846)
     at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readOrdinaryObject(ObjectInputStream.java:1753)
     at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject0(ObjectInputStream.java:1329)
     at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject(ObjectInputStream.java:351)
     at sun.rmi.server.UnicastRef.unmarshalValue(UnicastRef.java:306)
     at sun.rmi.server.UnicastRef.invoke(UnicastRef.java:155)
     ... 12 more
If I put xerces in jrockit classpath (putting the jar in jrockit-R27.4.0-jdk1.6.0_02\jre\lib\ext dir) just to workaround ClassNotFoundException and test again I get a new error:
Could not open Memory Leak Detector for (1.6) org.jboss.Main (4460).
java.rmi.UnmarshalException: error unmarshalling return; nested exception is:
     java.io.IOException: unknown protocol: resource
java.rmi.UnmarshalException: error unmarshalling return; nested exception is:
     java.io.IOException: unknown protocol: resource
     at sun.rmi.server.UnicastRef.invoke(UnicastRef.java:173)
     at com.sun.jmx.remote.internal.PRef.invoke(Unknown Source)
     at javax.management.remote.rmi.RMIConnectionImpl_Stub.getMBeanInfo(Unknown Source)
     at javax.management.remote.rmi.RMIConnector$RemoteMBeanServerConnection.getMBeanInfo(RMIConnector.java:1037)
     at com.jrockit.console.rjmx.RJMXConnection.getMBeanInfos(RJMXConnection.java:279)
     at com.jrockit.console.rjmx.RJMXConnection.getMBeanInfos(RJMXConnection.java:314)
     at com.jrockit.console.rjmx.RJMXConnectorModel.initializeAttributeInfos(RJMXConnectorModel.java:294)
     at com.jrockit.console.rjmx.RJMXConnectorModel.<init>(RJMXConnectorModel.java:99)
     at com.jrockit.console.rjmx.RJMXConnectorModel.<init>(RJMXConnectorModel.java:113)
     at com.jrockit.mc.memleak.ui.RjmxMemleakEditorInput.connect(Unknown Source)
     at com.jrockit.mc.memleak.ui.actions.StartMemleak$1.preConnect(Unknown Source)
     at com.jrockit.mc.browser.utils.PreConnectJob.run(PreConnectJob.java:73)
     at org.eclipse.core.internal.jobs.Worker.run(Worker.java:58)
Caused by: java.io.IOException: unknown protocol: resource
     at java.net.URL.readObject(URL.java:1219)
     at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
     at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
     at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
     at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
     at java.io.ObjectStreamClass.invokeReadObject(ObjectStreamClass.java:974)
     at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readSerialData(ObjectInputStream.java:1846)
     at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readOrdinaryObject(ObjectInputStream.java:1753)
     at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject0(ObjectInputStream.java:1329)
     at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject(ObjectInputStream.java:351)
     at java.util.HashMap.readObject(HashMap.java:1157)
     at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor3.invoke(Unknown Source)
     at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
     at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
     at java.io.ObjectStreamClass.invokeReadObject(ObjectStreamClass.java:974)
     at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readSerialData(ObjectInputStream.java:1846)
     at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readOrdinaryObject(ObjectInputStream.java:1753)
     at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject0(ObjectInputStream.java:1329)
     at java.io.ObjectInputStream.access$300(ObjectInputStream.java:188)
     at java.io.ObjectInputStream$GetFieldImpl.readFields(ObjectInputStream.java:2107)
     at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readFields(ObjectInputStream.java:519)
     at javax.management.modelmbean.DescriptorSupport.readObject(DescriptorSupport.java:1270)
     at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor2.invoke(Unknown Source)
     at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
     at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
     at java.io.ObjectStreamClass.invokeReadObject(ObjectStreamClass.java:974)
     at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readSerialData(ObjectInputStream.java:1846)
     at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readOrdinaryObject(ObjectInputStream.java:1753)
     at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject0(ObjectInputStream.java:1329)
     at java.io.ObjectInputStream.defaultReadFields(ObjectInputStream.java:1945)
     at java.io.ObjectInputStream.defaultReadObject(ObjectInputStream.java:480)
     at javax.management.modelmbean.ModelMBeanAttributeInfo.readObject(ModelMBeanAttributeInfo.java:524)
     at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor5.invoke(Unknown Source)
     at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
     at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
     at java.io.ObjectStreamClass.invokeReadObject(ObjectStreamClass.java:974)
     at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readSerialData(ObjectInputStream.java:1846)
     at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readOrdinaryObject(ObjectInputStream.java:1753)
     at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject0(ObjectInputStream.java:1329)
     at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readArray(ObjectInputStream.java:1667)
     at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject0(ObjectInputStream.java:1323)
     at java.io.ObjectInputStream.defaultReadFields(ObjectInputStream.java:1945)
     at java.io.ObjectInputStream.defaultReadObject(ObjectInputStream.java:480)
     at javax.management.MBeanInfo.readObject(MBeanInfo.java:669)
     at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor9.invoke(Unknown Source)
     at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
     at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
     at java.io.ObjectStreamClass.invokeReadObject(ObjectStreamClass.java:974)
     at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readSerialData(ObjectInputStream.java:1846)
     at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readOrdinaryObject(ObjectInputStream.java:1753)
     at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject0(ObjectInputStream.java:1329)
     at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject(ObjectInputStream.java:351)
     at sun.rmi.server.UnicastRef.unmarshalValue(UnicastRef.java:306)
     at sun.rmi.server.UnicastRef.invoke(UnicastRef.java:155)
     ... 12 more
Can anyone help me?
Thank's,
Anderson Souza
Java/JEE Architect - Brasil

It was a good attempt, but I'm still getting the same exceptions.
I tried to create a new service file, and it was successful deployed:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<server>
<mbean code="bea.jrockit.management.JRockitConsole" name="bea.jrockit.management:type=JRockitConsole">
</mbean>
</server>
After it I opened JBoss JMX Console and I saw the following mbeans published:
bea.jrockit.management
type=Compilation
type=DiagnosticCommand
type=GarbageCollector
type=JRA
type=JRockitConsole
type=Log
type=MemLeak
type=Memory
type=PerfCounters
type=Profiler
type=Runtime
So, it appears that all jkrockit MBeans are published, but the problem persist.
Any other suggestion?
Thanks,
Anderson Souza

HT4689 With mission control in Mountain Lion, is there a setting that displays a document name when it is selected?

For example, if I have 4 word documents open, and go to mission control so they are all displayed, can I turn a feature on that displays the document name when my mouse is over each document?
Like in the picture, if I have my mouse over a document, the name of the document isn't displayed. Can I change this?

Hey!
I just got a new mac and was trying to figure out the same thing today!! I went from an older version to this 10.9. I called apple support, the tech had no idea what I was talking about. I was transferred to a manager who told me that it is not feature available on the new models. After a 40 minute conversation I was about to let it go and then I saw this post and became determined LOL ... and I figured it out (SMH apple support). So here is how you do you it:
system preferences > trackpad > you want to make sure the "App Expose" is checked off > and you're done!!
I am not able to upload a 2 photos so I will post a second screenshot of what it looks like once the preferences are set.

MISSION CONTROL, LAUNCHPAD, and FULL SCREEN APPS (one month later)

I'm pretty good embracing a new thing when it comes along. I downloaded LION the day it come out, which was over a month ago at this point. On that day, I immediately found MISSION CONTROL and LAUNCHPAD both uninituitve and pointless. Unhandy iCandy. And of FULL SCREEN APPS? Not necessary on an iMac anyway.
So I quickly sought out quick solutions to 'fix' these new features. Launchpad and full screen apps have the advantage that they can be simply ignored. This is a good thing. Mission Control, on the other hand, got in the way of a beloved feature for me: what was once SPACES and EXPOSE. That is, I couldn't simply ignore MC because I still needed the previous helpful features in Snow Leopard.
My solution was kind of surprising and eye-opening. It's complicated to explain but I thought I'd share. This conclusion is likely best suited for someone not using a small screened Mac. It turns out that most users (with big enough screens) don't really need Mission Control, Launchpad, Spaces, or Full Screen apps.
At all.
Let's go through that conclusion, one by one:
FULL SCREEN APPS
If you have a relatively big screen (20 iMac for instance), why do you need Safari full screen? Unless you intend to sit across the room from the computer, no reason. And there's lots of bright empty space when you do this. Do you need the Mail app full screen? If you need reading glasses, maybe, but otherwise, nope. I find it's easier just to stretch out an app pretty big and leave it at that.
Full screen apps DO offer a nice feature which is making your desktop, menubar, and dock go BYE BYE. I can see where sometimes this is a useful feature, but typically -- NOPE. Typically I want access to my dock (to switch between open apps without the added step of cancelling full screen first), and typically I want access to my menubar so that I can glance up and see what time it is or find an app menu quickly.
The only feature I find worthy of praise with full screen apps is that they hide the clutter on your desktop. But there's an app in the Mac App Store which makes your desktop icons vanish with the touch of a button (CAMOUFLAGE). I mean, what's the point of a wallpaper if you bury it with desktop clutter or eliminate it with full screen apps? If it's a busy and distracting wallpaper, umm... you picked bad wallpaper.
LAUNCH PAD
LAUNCH PAD offers an iOS experience inside OS X. At first I thought it was completely silly. After a month now, I kinda get why it's there. Kinda.
You see, before LP, to duplicate it's functionality, you'd have to organize folders yourself. Put folders of various apps together. Place them somewhere in the finder heirarchy. Then drag those folders into the part of the dock with the trashcan. Then you could click them open and have access to similarly themed folders of apps. The problem here, of course, is that unless you're a power user, you'll never do this.
So Apple thought, AH-HA, we'll just drag into OS X a paradigm that users already get from iOS. Clumping apps together any way you like them. The misfire, if you ask me, is not allowing users to drag the new iOS folders straight into the dock when finished. That is to say: copies of said organized folders. It's as if Apple's software people have complete contempt for the dock -- and are desperate to have users abandon it.
My problem is that I like having folders in my dock of stuff I need. It just works, as Steve says. Going to the same EXACT place every time I need anything is more intuitive and graceful than ADDING an app called Launchpad that launches you into a different finder altogether. Makes zero sense and THIS is why I say, like FULL SCREEN APPS, LP can basically be abandoned.
By the way: need proof that Apple has complete contempt for the Dock?
MISSION CONTROL/SPACES
A month has passed since MC was introduced and SPACES was eliminated. I dare anyone to tell me why either is needed at all. Before you get iMiffed, humor me for a moment and hear me out.
The notion of SPACES was that it's a neat way to keep like minded open apps together. I totally bought into this, back in the day. So much so that I was iMiffed when it was gone in Lion. But let's look at this closer.
The REASON why we needed SPACES was that we could have WAY too many windows open at once on a Mac. Right? A big mess of windows covering each other up. Suppose you're surfing in Safari but need iTunes? But iTunes is hidden. So what did you do? You went to Spaces as step one, moused over to your iTunes space as move two, and then clicked it as move three. Seems like a great solution until the day you discover that you could simply click on iTunes in the dock as move one and arrive at iTunes. As one step. Period. Really simple, right?
Why have Spaces and apps dance around when you can just click the app you want and be done with it? That's the critical observation to make in order to follow my entire line of reasoning. Sure, it may look really cool and make Windows machines look like junk, but at the end of the day, why add two steps to something you might do 100 times a day -- switching between apps.
So why OH why did Apple add Spaces? Simple: because too many apps were visible at once in one 'desktop' window. So if you can build many new desktops, there might only be one or two in each. Great solution. Right?
Wrong, as it turns out. Because we still have the two extra steps. It's a weak solution. And it's in complete contempt of the Dock, which as it turns out, offers the strongest solution.
The strong solution would be that only one app is visible in your Mac's window at all times. Say you're in Safari. Despite having 12 other apps open, you only see Safari. Your dock tells you that you have other apps open, but nothing else sits in your window BUT the app you're using. So you want to go to iTunes? So click on it in the dock and Safari vanishes and iTunes emerges by itself. No other windows. What could be simpler? (This app is freeware known as ISOLATOR.)
If you download and try ISOLATOR, you'll say, umm, okay, but wait: sometimes I do want more than one window in view. Okay, fine, turn it off then. From the handy menu bar menu. I find that 98% of the time I need ISOLATOR on. Mileage may vary.
So let's recap. One third party software removes distracting desktop clutter, the other removes distracting app windows. Both can be toggled on and off from the menu bar. One is free, one costs $2. These two solutions remove the only real feature of FULL SCREEN APPS and make SPACES and it's newfangled cousin MISSION CONTROL pointless.
Need that last one explained? Well, what's Mission Control but a variant of spaces? To invoke MC and switch to the needed window are those same two annoying steps Spaces added into the mix. Nothing was fixed. Plus, like spaces, you must invest time and energy organizing such spaces.
Why bother? And so I ask again: can somebody who's read and tried the above carefully explain to me why Mission Control, Launchpad, and Full Screen Apps are really needed at all? (Outside of small screened Macs.) Doesn't the dock and these two sharewares together solve most problems?
Am I missing something?

I agree with everything you said about full screen apps, mission control and launchpad. For apps that made sense to run full screen, they already could under SL. Launchpad is totally unnecessary and Mission Control is a mere shadow of Expose and Spaces.
However, I feel you have not given due credit to Spaces. The point of Spaces is to let one organise logical desktops for different tasks, not just a way to reduce the number of windows on display. For example, I have a Space for software development where I run Xcode and the iPhone simulator, a Firefox window showing perhaps documentation or some other websites pertaining to software development, a Finder window that is opened in the folder with my design docs. I have another Space where I have the remote login sessions, yet another Space with another Firefox window where I do general surfing and emailing. I can switch between these spaces using a keyboard shortcut, which is much quicker than having to lift my hand off the keyboard, move it over to the mouse, move the mouse pointer over the Dock, find the app and click on it, only to find that it has switched to the wrong window of the app.
Without Spaces, organisation of my desktop is disrupted each time I want to switch task, whereas Spaces allows me to drop everything I am doing, go and do something completely different for a while and go back to my exact previous environment. I have a 27" iMac so am not short of screen space but I use Spaces extensively. BTW, switching Spaces using a keyboard shortcut is a lot faster on SL than the equivalent on Lion, thanks to the gratuitous screen animation of the latter.

Exposing MBeans to JRocket mission control

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for