Extended classic senario with central invoice function

Could we use central invoice function in Extended classic senario, anybody could give us some advice?

Hi. Central invoice lets you enter an invoice against any PO on the system, and normal invoice (desktop user) only allows you to enter an invoice against your own POs.
Both should work in extended classic, I have never heard anything different.
Regards,
Dave.

Similar Messages

Archive Purchase Order in SRM 5.0@ extended classic senario

Dear SRM Guru,
I use SRM 5.0 in extended classic senario, how can i archive purchase order with limit order using standard SAP?
Thanks.
Regards,
Kim

Hi Kim,
your question is a quite open one. So I try to answer with different flavours - hope there a right one for you.
In case you'd like to archive over system boundaries, i.e. since to ECC PO is a copy of a leading PO in SRM, you might expect that you somehow can archive both at once. This is not happening - i.e. you have to archive both separately.
When you look up notes 726509 SRM archiving: Archiving of R/3 documents with SRM, 723685 SRM: History after the archiving of R/3 documents you might figure out more.
There was an issue in archiving that the workitems were not archived with reference to the SRM document - but this is resolved via note as well. Search for related notes with 'Archiving' + 'SRM' in the service portal.
When you want to figure out more regarding the archiving dependencies you can look up the archiving trx. SARA resp. the archiving programs in SE38: BBP_DP_ARCH_* (CHECK, DELETE, WRITE, SET_STATUS).
Regards,
Richard

Extended classic senario - po

Hi ,
In extended classic senario PO will create at enterprise buyer only.
Then how these PO wil transfer to backend system. That PO numbers are same or create with new numbers??
And also i have very small doubt in which situations PR will create ? at what situations PO will create??
what is the exact difference???

Hi Viswanath,
In case of Extended Classic scenario P.O is created in SRM and that is transferred to SRM through RFC and can be displayed in R/3.
Leading P.O means the P.O that can be changeable. That means in Extended classic scenario P.O is changeable only in SRM where as in Classic scenario P.O is changeable only in R/3.
Since P.O is a legal document which will be sent to external parties (suppliers / vendors) the number should be same whether you create in SRM or R/3.Thats why we mainatin same number range for P.Os in both SRM & R/3.
P.Rs are only created in R/3 when you are using the Classic scenario once the shopping cart gets approved in SRM.
The creation of P.R or P.O in R/3 depends on the setting in SPRO in SRM.
SPRO > IMG > SRM > SRM Server > Cross Application Basic Settings > Define objects in backend system
There depending upon the setting for the concerned category I.D & P.Group either a P.O or a P.R will be created in backend R/3.
Hope this makes you more clear in understanding the issue. Clarifications are welcome.
Award points for helpful answers.
Rgds,
Teja

ASN in Extended Classic Scenario with SUS

Hi SRMer?
Is it possible to create an ASN in SUS with Extended Classic Scenario (ECS)?
OSS note 543544 mention that the scenario is limited for document types Purchase Order, Purchase Order Response and Change Order. Confirmations and invoices are not possible. There is no indication on ASNs.
Any help will be appreciated.
Regards.

Hi
Please go through these links ->
SUS-MM Confirmation without ASN
Re: Details on ASN
The specified item was not found.
SUS ASN - mandatory field
ASN Confirmation not created,
Clarifications on EBP-SUS and MM-SUS Scenario
Re: SUS-MM scenario with "POR (order ack.)" and ASN for free text
Creating custom field in ASN screen of SRM SUS
SUS Invoice
Regards
- Atul

Can we use the Extended Classic Scenario with MM-SUS

HI, expert :
    In extended classic scenario ,the PO created in SRM system ,and then replicated into the MM system .You can't change it in MM system .
    So, in this situation ,I want to know the MM-SUS can be suitable or not ?The PO can transfer from ECC to SUS ?
   If I use the decoupled scenario ,which one I can select ?MM-SUS or EBP -sus ?
   BR !
Alex!

Hi Alex,
as noted by Bill, in MM-SUS is the extended classic not possible at all.
By default it's also not supported in the SRM-SUS. Please see the note 543544. If you would like to activate this, you need to pay a consulting fee for SAP:
"Please note that the full scenario can be enabled by a consulting solution, compare OSS note 700350."
Regards,
Peter

Classic and extended classic scenario with one EBP

Hello Guys
If I have a one EBP and multiple ERP back ends. For one backend, I need to have classic and other to have extended classic scenario. How this can be fulfilled. Is it possible, if so please provide the configuration setup.
Thanks in advance.

Hello,
In BADI BBP_EXTLOCALPO_BADI method DETERMINE_EXTPO.
you can try this.
Structure Declaration
DATA: ls_item_data TYPE bbps_extpo_badi.
Moving item data to a structure
MOVE-CORRESPONDING item_data TO ls_item_data.
SELECT SINGLE LOGSYS FROM comm_product
                                 INTO lv_logsys
                                 WHERE PRODUCT_GUID = ls_item_data-PRODUCT .
If lv_logsys = 'XXXCLNT010' "backend system
      Cancelling the enhanced classical scenario
        bbp_extpo_gl-bbpexpo = space.
ELSE IF lv_logsys = 'YYYCLNT010' "backend system
      Cancelling the enhanced classical scenario
        bbp_extpo_gl-bbpexpo = ' X'.
ENDIF.
Regards,
Neelima

ASN for extended classic scenario

Hello all,
we have SRM with extended classic scenario (EBP-MM),
is it possible to use ASN (shipping notification) functionality in our system ?
Kind regards,
Arthur

Hi
ASN can be created by the vendor in SUS system for that XI mapping is required. ASn can be created in SUS by any vendor users. I guess it's not possible with ECS.
Please check the SAP Consulting Note 1026638 GR Output Integration with MM-SUS Scenario for R/3 <= 47
You need to have functional background for this:
To create an ASN against PO or SA release:
1. you need to compulsarily put how much qty you are sending against the reqd. qty(shown by PO / SA )
2. dispatch vehicle no. (optional)
3. road challan no. (optional)
4. one more optional entry ( sorry I forgot)
Useful related pointers ->
Re: how does the GR get into SUS---MM-SUS Sceanario
ASN in Extended Classic Scenario with SUS
SUS ASN & Invoice
The specified item was not found.
Do let me know.
Regards
- Atul

FM posting date issue in extended classic

We are experiencing issue with SRM deriving incorrect posting period when PO changes are made. We are in extended classic scenario with two FM periods open across fiscal years.
PO changes “No further confirmation” and “No further Invoice” from “No” to “Yes”, changes to anything on Account assignment(Asset, GL account, fund etc).
Earlier when we were in Classic scenario, we had FMOD capability to post the FM documents in previous year and current year. Do we have similar functionality retained in extended classic?

Hello Ratnakar,
could you please check below OSS note:
1981805 - Document Date is always updated with FM Posting Date
You could also check for OSS notes dealing with PSM-GPR-POR application area.
Regards.
Laurent.

PO output for Extended classic Scenario from the R/3 backend

Hi,
1) Does the PO output (ignoring the config maintained in SRM server 5.5 for the output) through R/3 backend is standard or it is mandatory to give local outputs from SRM only incase of Extended classic scenario?
Regards,
DV

Hi Anil,
We are working on extended classic scenario with SRM 5.0 & ECC6.0.
Please explain how we can take "PO output for Extended classic Scenario from the R/3 backend ".
Please send the related document to [email protected]
Thanks in advance
Ashutosh

Extended Classic Scenario - Free Items?

Does SAP support PO's in Extended Classic Scenario with a zero price (free items)?
My client is switching from classic to extended classic scenario and they require to be able to creaet PO's that have a zero price like they have in the classic scenario.
We are currently getting an error that we need a price with the IR flag, but I would expect the system to automatically unflag the IR flag for a free item?

Hi Jay,
Thanks for your response. There are two problems with your soluiton. First the shopping cart doesn't have the IR flag on it and can't be changed by the user and we have PO's created directly from SC's and go out to the vendor.
Second, In extended classic scenario it apprears that the system doesn't allow you to change the ir flag on the PO and make the cooresponding change in the ERP PO.

Completion workflow in extended classic scenario

Hi gurus,
We use extended classic scenario with SRM Server 5.5.
In ppoma, each purch org and purch groups has the local and the backend. Vendors are replicated to backend purch org and then also to the local purch org.
I have seen that in classic scenario purchasers should be assigned to the local purch org. however, completion workflow only determine the agent (purchaser) if it is in the backend purch org.
The problem is that then this purchasers cannot manage any business partner.
How can I solve it?
I have seen other clients that the completion workflow determine the agents in the local purch org...
Many thanks!!!
Regards
Patrícia

Hi,
In the Extended classic scenario, local purchasing organisation and purchasing groups are required to create shopping carts and purchase orders. in this scenario, when
the vendors are replicated from the SAP back-end using BBPGETVD,BBPUPDVD program or vendor-synchronization programs, the vendor update in SRM is only for the R/3 purchasing organizations. because the local purchasing organisations are required in SRM for the Extended Classic or standalone scenario, these replicated vendors needs to be extended to the local purchasing organisations.
organizations can use Tx. BBP_UPDATE_PORG for extending the vendors to the local purchasing organiztion.
see OSS Note 390546 for more info.
Regards
vasanth

EWHT - Central Invoice proportionately Check

Dear Gurus,
At the time of advance payment to vendors EWHT Type dependency is not working while I check the Central Invoice proportionately. If I have not check the central invoice proc. radio button that time it will be worked. But I want dependency along with central Invoicing adjustment.
Thanks in advance
Regards
Raju

Hi
Kindly apply Notes 826326 and 896654
Regards
Sachin

'BAPI_POEC_CREATE' function doesn't work with extended classic scenario

Hi everybody.
Antecedents:
We are working in an extended classic scenario.
When we create a Purchase Order via ITS in SRM, the system works ok, the PO is replicated in the ERP system.
But when we execute BAPI_POEC_CREATE function module in order to create a PO in SRM, no message are available in the application monitor, but the PO is not replicated in the ERP system.
Both exampled were created with exactly same data (partners, items, categories, accounts, )
Moreover when we modify the second PO created via ITS, the systems doesnt show any error message, we can order our PO again without error, but the PO isnt replicate in the ERP system.
1. We executed BAPI_POEC_GETDETAIL function module, and there is only a difference between POs, E_PO_STATUS table.
PO created by transaction has 8 entries:
       I1009 X
       I1015 X
       I1021
       I1038
       I1039 X
       I1043
       I1080 X
       I1180
And PO created by BAPI has 5 entries:
       I1015 X
       I1021
       I1038
       I1043
       I1180
2. We run BBP_PD transaction, and there is only a difference.
PO created by transaction mode shows:
- Message: W BBP_PD 830 Default values have been taken from Vendor PRUEBA10/purchasing organization Área Global Compras (org. compras)
And PO created by BAPI
- Message: No Messages
Could anyone help me with the problem?
Thanks in advance.
Raúl.

Hi Raúl,
this is exact, BAPI_POEC_CREATE is designed to create local PO.
If you want to replicate it to R/3, then you have to change it to an ECS PO.
In BADI BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI, called at the real beginning of BBP_PD_PO_CREATE, you will have to change some data to enable the ECS scenario:
- change header subtype to EP
- change header log system to SRM (keep FI LS as is)
- determine a backend purch group & org
- complete BE fields (be_object_id, be_object_type, don't change be_log_system because it will be determined during the transfer, be_pur_org and be_pur_group will also be determined during the transfer)
- ... and maybe other R/3 relevant fields
Compare both PO one by one, and adapt the gaps.
Rgds
Christophe
PS: please reward points for helpfull answers

Invoicing Plan functionality in Extended Classic scenario

Hi,
For PO's are created in SRM-Extended Classic scenario, kindly let me know on how to maitain Invoicing plans.
Thanks,
KB

Hi. You could use ERS.
Let's say you wanted an invoice plan to pay every month for 12 months, you could create a cart on an ERS vendor and order quantity 12, unit months.
Then every month the user could do a goods receipt for 1 month.
That would trigger an ERS invoice, just like an invoice plan would.
The only problem with this is that you are relying on the user to do the goods receipt.
Regards,
Dave.

Partner functions OA and IP missing for Vendor in Extended classic PO

As part of current Classic scenario, we have maintained OA (Ordering Address) and PI (Invoicing Party) for a vendor in R/3. We have also maintained different ordering addresses for multiple plants in the Vendor master: Partner functions screen --> Alternative data.
I would like to acheive the same functionality in Extended Classic scenario. We have replicated the vendors from R/3 to SRM. After activating Extended Classic scenario, we see only VN as the partner function in R/3 PO.
Q1. How can we enable OA and PI partner functions in R/3 PO (Extended Classic) ?
Q2. How can we enable different ordering addresses for multiple plants in R/3 PO (Extended Classic) ?

Hi
Which SRM Server are you using ?
You need to maintain Partner Functions in the SRM Server - SPRO Transaction - Configuration Settings.
Here is the Path from SPRO Transaction ->
Supplier Relationship Management -> SRM Server -> Cros Application Basic-Settings -> Define Partner Functions
Maintain Similar entries as mentioned below.
Function Function Type Usage Description Abbreviation
00000016 0013 B2B Requester RQ
00000017 0007 B2B Contact Person CP
00000018 0011 B2B Bidder BI
00000019 0012 B2B Vendor VD
00000020 0002 B2B Goods Recipient GR
00000025 0014 B2B Portal Provider PP
00000026 0008 B2B Responsible Employee RE
00000027 0017 B2B Ship-To Address DP
00000028 0003 B2B Invoice Recipient IR
00000029 0015 B2B Invoicing Party IP
00000030 0018 B2B Ship-From Address SP
00000034 0002 B2B Plant PLNT
00000038 0001 B2B Sold-to Party ORDR
00000039 0026 B2B Preferred Vendor PRVD
00000051 0019 B2B Purch. Org. Auth. For Release AREL
00000074 0025 B2B Service Agent SERV
00000075 0031 B2B Location LOCA
00000097 0034 B2B Invoicing Party Employee IPEm
Hope this will definitely help.
More details ->
For 1), see these links below ->
Partner function missing in backend PO
Re: Error in transmission while PO cration
"Multiple" partner data at PO header
Partner functions in plan driven MM-SUS
Re: Partner function not found
Number range for business partner
Re: Problem with BP. Assignment: Business partner person to user not unique
Error in creation of Employee for Business Partner
Re: enter exactly one partner of type vendor
Re: Business partner as Vendor and Invoicing Party
Partner functions in EBP for extended Classic Scenario
Classic Scenario PO has multiple OA Partner Functions for Vendor
For 2), see the pointers ->
There is an article written by Jason Didday at www.saptips.com entitled "mySAP SRM and SAP R/3 Partner Functions: Supporting OAs, VNs and IPs" that you may find useful.
In SRM, there is no standard relation betwwen plant and vendor master data.
You can use BBP_GET_VMDATA_CF BADI to add backend data in SRM while using BBPGETVD and BBPUPDVD transactions.
Replication of Ordering Address from R/3 to SRM
Re: Adding Partner Function to R/3 PO from SRM in Classic using BADI
Partner function Payee in SRM
Adding Partner Function to R/3 PO from SRM in Classic using BADI
Do let me know.
Regards
- Atul

Extended classic senario with central invoice function

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for