Extended Receiver Determinatipon and Interface Determination?

Hi,
Where exactly (In which business cases) we can implement or required Extended Receiver Determination and Interface Determination?
Thanks,
Naidu.

Hi,
There are only two modes standard and Extended, Enhanced receiver determinatrion is Extended receiver determination only.
Enhanced(Extended) receiver determination -->
Whenever list of receivers is determined dynamically at runtime, using a message mapping then it is called enhanced.
Enhanced Interface Determination--> It is when you want the target interfaces to be defined dynamically based on the multimapping, that is called enhanced interface determination.
Refre SAP help for more detail
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/42/ed364cf8593eebe10000000a1553f7/frameset.htm
Thanks!
Edited by: Sudhir Tiwari on Dec 5, 2008 6:34 AM

Similar Messages

Receiver Agreement and Interface determination

Hi
I have an input file that generates two output files. The two output files go to the same interface. One output file will have header and the other will have details. I want to kow how many receiver determination, interface determination, sender agreement and receiver agreements we need to create
Regards

Hi Ajith,
As perception, I understand that you would like to like to split the input file into two as Header and Details. For this requirement, you should need Integration Directory (Configuration) as below:
1. Need to Two Receiver agreements.
2. One Receiver determination.
3. One sender agreement.
4. One Interface determination ( Type: Enhanced)
Thanks,

Receiver Determination and Interface Determination Condition conflict in ICO

Hi,
I found a strange issue today while configuring two receivers using the Receiver and Interface Determination conditions.
Sender - Proxy Service
Receiver1 - ReceiverA
Receiver2 - ReceiverB
Receiver Determination Condition : When Field1 = 100, message should flow to ReceiverA and ReceiverB
Interface Determination Condition (ReceiverA) : When Field1=100 and Field2=50 message should flow to a specific interface in ReceiverA
There is no Interface Determination condition for ReceiverB, for all messages having Field1=100, it should go to ReceiverB.
Test Scenarios:
1) Field1=100, Field2=50 : Message flows successfully to ReceiverA and ReceiverB
2) Field1=100, Field2=89 : Message fails to process from ECC itself throwing Interface Determination not found error. Ideally this is a positive scenario for ReceiverB and it should send the message to ReceiverB without any errors. But, this did not happen in this case
I tried the same by configuring the conditions completely in Receiver Determination itself without using the Interface Determination, it worked perfectly fine. But, just wanted to understand that if this is an expected behavior.

Hi Sherin,
As there are two receivers Receiver A and Receiver B.You need to create two bussiness components and two communcication channels for two receivers and one Reciver Determination, two Interface Determination,two Receiver Agreement.In Receiver Determination you need to keep the below and condition.
In the above screenshot the two receiver are Receiver B and Receiver C and Field 1 is Key_Value and Field2 is Emp_ID.
If the Key_Value=100 and Emp_ID =22 then the message should go to both the receivers B & C by keeping the following AND condition
If the Key_Value=100 and Emp_ID is not equal to 22 then the message should go only to Receiver B by keeping the following condition
You need not keep any condition in Interface Determination just create 2 Interface determination for two receivers.
Hope this helps you.
Thanks,
Durga.

Receiver Determination and Interface Determination

Hi,
Please, can anyone explain what is the concept of 'Receiver determination' and 'Interface Determination'?
Thanks,
Harikumar. S

Hi,
>>>>Receiver determination
its about finding the receiver system for particular source system and outbound interface.
Suppose,you want to send data from file->XI->SAP and CRM based on some condition
in this scenario you need to determine whether to send file data to SAP or CRM system,this decision you will do in Receiver determination
in Receiver determination screen you need to provide the following details
1.Source system(ex: File system)
2.Outbound Interface(File Message Interface)
3.condition and receiving system(ex:if some x field value in source payload is 1 go to SAP elseif '0' go to CRM system)
>>>>>>Interface Determination
suppose in above scenario you determined the receiver i.e SAP,you will have number of IDOCs (Inbound Interfaces)in SAP.
so to which IDOC you will send file data?This decision you will make in Interface determination(we can it as Inbound Interface determination).if you find the IDOC is CREMAS then how will transfer file structure data to IDOC structure? answer is Message Mapping
From all the above decisions you need to provide following details in Interface determination screen
1.Source System
2.Outbound Interface
3.Receiver System
4.Inbound Interface(IDOC type)
5.Message Mapping(i.e file to IDOC)
Even in Interface determination you can specify the condition to select Inbound Interfaces(ex.IDOCs)
if you have any doubts please lets know.
Cheers,
Jag

Receiver and Interface determination

Hi,
My senario is File to IDOC and mail.
The condition here is the count of Idoc generated has to be sent as a mail and the mail has to be sent only after the IDoc has been generated successfully.
So i am using two receiver services one is for IDOC and other is for mail and in one receiver determination I am refering TWO reciver Service without any condition.
now i have to use only one interface determination to maintain the order at runtime. so that the interface mapping for mail will be triggered only after the Idoc interfacemapping is successfull.
but in receiver agreement i am not able to refer the Receiver channel for Mail. because the receiver service is still poiting to the Idoc Serveice.
Plz advice.

Hi!
I think the above requirement will also work by using a simple BPM. just try with below steps.
Steps in BPM::
1. Receive step to receive File from a third party by using File Sender CC.
2. SEND ASYNCH step to send IDOC generated Structure data.
3. Before going to next step please find any constant value which will be coming into IDOC from file that
    means for example if your IDOC cotnains any field like ORDER_Generated_By or
    GENERATED_BY:: AMAR name is same in all the data that is coming into IDOC remember that Field
    Name name and insert it in the swtich statement condition editor.
4. Now Insert Switch Condition with 2 branches A & B,
     a) Branch A contains control statement and this branch executes only if the condition statisfies with
        If that IDOC Field lets say name XXXX is equal to constant value AMAR then raise/throws an alert
        mail by uising Control Step.
    b) In Branch B also you ill be including Control Step but this control Step will says that MAIL
        INDICATION No IDOC is generated by using another control step.
5) Remaining all other configurations like 2 receiver agreements and every thing aare same.
6) But you need to confgure ALert configuration settings okay.
You can also achive this by using without BPM.::
In ID part:: you need to enter a condition in Receiver Determination with two receiver business systems and that condition will be once the IDOC field like XXXXX(generated_by is equal to some constant like AMAR ) then it needs to active the Mail Business System.
but this would be little but confusion and but u can achive the above requirement by using simple BPM.
Note:: Only diadvantage will be some performance issue will come if goes through BPM but it works
          very 100 systamatic way because you can review where exactly your Scenario strucks and also
          u can check whether your IDOC generated or not whether mail sent or not in the BPM WORK
           FLOW in the BUSINESS PROCESS ENGINE.
Regards::
Amar Srinivas Eli

Receiver and Interface Determination, Sender and Receiver Agreement

Hi Experts,
Could you please tell me, what Receiver Determination, Interface Determination, Sender Agreement and Receiver Agreement we have to use for the below blog.
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/1403 [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken]
Regards
Sara

Hi Sara,
WS->BP
Receiver Determination: Sender IF, Sender NS, Sender BS determine the BP
Interface Determination: Sender IF, Sender NS, Sender BS determine your start msg IF (abstr IF) and IF mapping
Sender Agreement: SOAP sender channel for that Sender IF, Sender NS, Sender BS
Receiver Agreement: not reqired
BP->DB
Receiver Determination: BP IF (abstr), BP IF NS, BP determine the 3rd party BS (DB)
Interface Determination: BP IF (abstr), BP IF NS, BP determine Inbound-IF and IF mapping
Sender Agreement: not reqired
Receiver Agreement: JDBC receiver channel for that Inbound IF, NS and 3rd party BS
BP->File
Receiver Determination: BP IF (abstr), BP IF NS, BP determine the 3rd party BS (File)
Interface Determination: BP IF (abstr), BP IF NS, BP determine Inbound-IF and IF mapping
Sender Agreement: not required
Receiver Agreement: File receiver channel for that Inbound IF, NS and 3rd party BS
Regards,
Udo

Need of creating receiver determination and interface determination

what is the need of creating interface determination where as providing all the details in Receiver determination?

Hi,
The loose coupling between the Interface mapping and receiver determination have provided the compatibility for reusability.
The Interface determination maintained and just linked to receiver determination so you could have multiple receiver determinations with common interface determination or vice-versa.
If you provide all the information in receiver determination then, it would be very dfficult to have the various mappins for multiple receivers maintained in receiver determination.
Interface determination is applied at runtime to all messages to be processed. Thus from security point of view of transaction of data. its preferable.
Thanks
Swarup

Interface Determination causing issue in Receiver Determination

Hi
I am having an issue with interface and receiver determination as follows:
- Inbound message may be sent to two receivers.
- Message gets sent to first receiver, fails during interface determination. There are multiple inbound interfaces found based on a set of XPATH conditions. This creates an error 'Inbound interface found more than once for outbound interface '. That is itself is not the issue.
- Issue is that the message is stopped from going to the other receiver even if there are no issues in the interface determination for that receiver.
Is there a way to resolve this? Appreciate any help. Thx, Duncan

Again, thanks for the replies.
MONI for RD
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_RD_PLSRV-ENTER_PLSRV">
<Trace level="1" type="T">R E C E I V E R - D E T E R M I N A T I O N</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Cache Content is up to date</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Start without given receiver</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Classic Receiver Determination via Rules.</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Check conditions for rule line no. 1</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">...create rule engine</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">...call rule engine for Condition %CL_SAI_SWF_RULE_ENGINE.MSG_GET(MSG=&_MSG&;NSP=&_NSM&;XPATH="/p2:despatchAdvice")% EX and %CL_SAI_SWF_RULE_ENGINE.MSG_GET(MSG=&_MSG&;NSP=&_NSM&;XPATH="/p2:despatchAdvice/deliveryNote/referenceIdentification")% CE COSTCENTRE or %CL_SAI_SWF_RULE_ENGINE.MSG_GET(MSG=&_MSG&;NSP=&_NSM&;XPATH="/p2:despatchAdvice")% EX and %CL_SAI_SWF_RULE_ENGINE.MSG_GET(MSG=&_MSG&;NSP=&_NSM&;XPATH="/p2:despatchAdvice/deliveryNote/referenceIdentification")% CE INTERPLANT or %CL_SAI_SWF_RULE_ENGINE.MSG_GET(MSG=&_MSG&;NSP=&_NSM&;XPATH="/p2:despatchAdvice")% EX and %CL_SAI_SWF_RULE_ENGINE.MSG_GET(MSG=&_MSG&;NSP=&_NSM&;XPATH="/p2:despatchAdvice/deliveryNote/referenceIdentification")% CE INTERPLANT_ONESTEP or %CL_SAI_SWF_RULE_ENGINE.MSG_GET(MSG=&_MSG&;NSP=&_NSM&;XPATH="/p2:despatchAdvice")% EX and %CL_SAI_SWF_RULE_ENGINE.MSG_GET(MSG=&_MSG&;NSP=&_NSM&;XPATH="/p2:despatchAdvice/deliveryNote/referenceIdentification")% CE INTRAPLANT or %CL_SAI_SWF_RULE_ENGINE.MSG_GET(MSG=&_MSG&;NSP=&_NSM&;XPATH="/p2:despatchAdvice")% EX and %CL_SAI_SWF_RULE_ENGINE.MSG_GET(MSG=&_MSG&;NSP=&_NSM&;XPATH="/p2:despatchAdvice/deliveryNote/referenceIdentification")% CE INTRAPLANT_ONESTEP or %CL_SAI_SWF_RULE_ENGINE.MSG_GET(MSG=&_MSG&;NSP=&_NSM&;XPATH="/p2:receivingAdvice")% EX or %CL_SAI_SWF_RULE_ENGINE.MSG_GET(MSG=&_MSG&;NSP=&_NSM&;XPATH="/p2:inventoryActivityOrInventoryStatus")% EX</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">......extracting (new) for Extractor: XP /p2:despatchAdvice</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">......extracting values found: 0</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">......extracting (new) for Extractor: XP /p2:receivingAdvice</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">......extracting values found: 1</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">...valid Receiver with Condition: - GLR430</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Check conditions for rule line no. 2</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">...call rule engine for Condition %CL_SAI_SWF_RULE_ENGINE.MSG_GET(MSG=&_MSG&;NSP=&_NSM&;XPATH="/p2:despatchAdvice")% EX and %CL_SAI_SWF_RULE_ENGINE.MSG_GET(MSG=&_MSG&;NSP=&_NSM&;XPATH="/p2:despatchAdvice/deliveryNote/referenceIdentification")% NE COSTCENTRE and %CL_SAI_SWF_RULE_ENGINE.MSG_GET(MSG=&_MSG&;NSP=&_NSM&;XPATH="/p2:despatchAdvice/deliveryNote/referenceIdentification")% NE INTERPLANT and %CL_SAI_SWF_RULE_ENGINE.MSG_GET(MSG=&_MSG&;NSP=&_NSM&;XPATH="/p2:despatchAdvice/deliveryNote/referenceIdentification")% NE INTERPLANT_ONESTEP and %CL_SAI_SWF_RULE_ENGINE.MSG_GET(MSG=&_MSG&;NSP=&_NSM&;XPATH="/p2:despatchAdvice/deliveryNote/referenceIdentification")% NE INTRAPLANT and %CL_SAI_SWF_RULE_ENGINE.MSG_GET(MSG=&_MSG&;NSP=&_NSM&;XPATH="/p2:despatchAdvice/deliveryNote/referenceIdentification")% NE INTRAPLANT_ONESTEP</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">...invalid Receiver: P_3PL_XML_ME_ODTH - despatchAdviceToE1EDT20</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Check conditions for rule line no. 3</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">...valid Receiver w/o Condition: P_3PL_XML_ME_ODTH - S_HTTP</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">No Receiver found behaviour: 0</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Number of Receivers:2</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
Here, you see that both receivers are found.
MONI for ID
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_INTERFACE_DETERMINATION" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="Timestamp">2007-02-26T20:06:49Z CET Start of pipeline service processing PLSRVID= PLSRV_INTERFACE_DETERMINATION</Trace>
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
<Trace level="3" type="T">Calling pipeline service: PLSRV_INTERFACE_DETERMINATION</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Reading Pipeline-Service specification...</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T" />
<Trace level="3" type="T">Pipeline service specification (table SXMSPLSRV)</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">PLSRVID = PLSRV_INTERFACE_DETERMINATION</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">PLSRVTYPE =</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">ADRESSMOD = LOCAL</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">P_CLASS = CL_ID_PLSRV</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">P_IFNAME = IF_XMS_PLSRV</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">P_METHOD = ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">FL_LOG =</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">FL_DUMMY = 0</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T" />
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL" />
- 
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_ID_PLSRV-ENTER_PLSRV">
<Trace level="1" type="T">I N T E R F A C E - D E T E R M I N A T I O N</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Cache Content is up to date</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Check conditions for (Inb: Party Srvc If) GLR430 WMMBXY.WMMBID01</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">...create rule engine</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">...call rule engine for Condition%CL_SAI_SWF_RULE_ENGINE.MSG_GET(MSG=&_MSG&;NSP=&_NSM&;XPATH="/p1:inventoryActivityOrInventoryStatus/inventoryDocumentType")% CE INVENTORY_STATUS</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">......extracting (new) for Extractor: XP /p1:inventoryActivityOrInventoryStatus/inventoryDocumentType</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">......extracting values found: 0</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">...invalid InbIf: WMMBXY.WMMBID01</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Check conditions for (Inb: Party Srvc If) GLR430 WMMBXY.WMMBID01</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">...call rule engine for Condition%CL_SAI_SWF_RULE_ENGINE.MSG_GET(MSG=&_MSG&;NSP=&_NSM&;XPATH="/p1:inventoryActivityOrInventoryStatus/inventoryDocumentType")% CE INVENTORY_ACTIVITY</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">......extracting (new) for Extractor: XP /p1:inventoryActivityOrInventoryStatus/inventoryDocumentType</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">......extracting values found: 0</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">...invalid InbIf: WMMBXY.WMMBID01</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Check conditions for (Inb: Party Srvc If) GLR430 WMMBXY.WMMBID01</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">...call rule engine for Condition%CL_SAI_SWF_RULE_ENGINE.MSG_GET(MSG=&_MSG&;NSP=&_NSM&;XPATH="/p2:receivingAdvice/receivingAdviceItemContainmentLineItem/purchaseOrder/documentReference/uniqueCreatorIdentification")% EX</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">......extracting (new) for Extractor: XP /p2:receivingAdvice/receivingAdviceItemContainmentLineItem/purchaseOrder/documentReference/uniqueCreatorIdentification</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">......extracting values found: 2</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">...valid InbIf with Condition: WMMBXY.WMMBID01</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Check conditions for (Inb: Party Srvc If) GLR430 WMMBXY.WMMBID01</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">...call rule engine for Condition%CL_SAI_SWF_RULE_ENGINE.MSG_GET(MSG=&_MSG&;NSP=&_NSM&;XPATH="/p2:receivingAdvice/carrier/additionalPartyIdentification/additionalPartyIdentificationValue")% CE SHUTTLE</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">......extracting (new) for Extractor: XP /p2:receivingAdvice/carrier/additionalPartyIdentification/additionalPartyIdentificationValue</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">......extracting values found: 1</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">...valid InbIf with Condition: WMMBXY.WMMBID01</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST">
<Trace level="3" type="T">Persisting message after plsrv call</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Message-Version = 002</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Message version 002</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="System_Error">Error exception return from pipeline processing!</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST" />
- 
<Trace level="3" type="T">Persisting message Status = 014</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Message version 003</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
</SAP:Trace>
Here, you see that the ID runs for the first receiver. It hits an error because two conditions on the ID for the first receiver are satisfied. However, it then stops rather than allow the processing for the other receiver to continue.
Any ideas? Thx, Duncan

Receiver determination Vs Interface determination

Hi Experts,
What is the difference between Receiver determination and Interface determination?
In both the case we specify sender -> outbound interface -> Receiver Service -> Interface mapping
Can't we use only interface mapping? Why SAP is providing these two determinations?
Thanks
Gopal

Hi,
>In both the case we specify sender -> outbound interface -> Receiver Service - Interface mapping
In receiver determination you only mention the Sender Service, Sender Interface and Reciever Service. You do not mention the Inbound Interafce and interface mapping. You do this in the Interface Determination.
The split between Receiver Determination and Interfacedetermiantion is so that you can add send the same message to Multiple Receivers and then fior each of the receivers , if needed you can add multiple Inbound Interafces / mappings!!
And you can add multiple conditions as well!! makes sense to me!
regards
Bhavesh

Meaning of multiple interface determination

I'm still starting with XI and some doubts are appearing while I get deeper into it. My doubt here is what's the sense in configuring more than one inbound interface in interface determination.
As you specificy sender and receiver services, and interface, how does it makes sense? I mean, the specified interface is forcing implicitily the inbound interface, so it doesn't make sense to define two different inbound interfaces.
Unless of course you choose the same inbound interface more than once, with different interface mappings, but then, which one would be chosen for an actual communication?
Thanks in advance.
(Environment XI 7.0)

I don't think you answered my question. I'm talking about configuration of two inbound interfaces in a single interface determination object.
In this image you can see one of my interface determinations:
[picture|http://img26.imageshack.us/my.php?image=interfacedet1ju7.jpg]
Sender service and sender interface are set and can't be modified, just as receiver service. This configuration is making mandatory that in the "configured interfaces" section, the inbound interface is BAPI_MATERIAL_GETALL, because that is the output message type of MI_OUT_S_0422_BAPI_MATERIAL_GETALL.
So what's the sense of adding a new line in the "configured interfaces" section?
It would only make sense using BAPI_MATERIAL_GETALL as inbound interface (is mandatory as I wrote before), and specify a different interface mapping. However, in that case, which one of those two would be used in runtime?
(Please answer directly to my questions and not just a general paragrafh. Otherwise I don't think we will get a successful communication. If what I write can't be understood please ask me.)
Thanks.

Multiple Interface Determination

Hello everybody,
I am working on the following szenarion:
- one sender and sender interface (incoming IDOC).
- one receiver with two different receiver interfaces (outgoing BAPIs). For one of these interfaces there exit two different interface and message mappings. So, 1 incoming interface => 3 outgoing with 2 different interfaces
So in the interface determination I want to rout the message by use of XPath expression to use one of the two interface (no problem at all), but also to choose one of two interface mappings for the same interface. If I try this by creating three lines in the interface determination and using different XPaths, the last entered interface always is deleted automatically.
Thanks for your help.

Hi,
To do what you want you may have to use both Receiver Determination and Interface Determination. XPath expressions can be used in both places.
In Receiver Determination, you will have 2 receiver services. Then, in one of the receiver services, you will have 2 Interface Determinations. So, you will end up with something like the following:
Receiver service1: interface1
Receiver service2: interface1, interface2
Regards,
Bill

Extended receiver and enhanced interface determination

Hi,
Can somebody list me the business cases when we use the extended receiver and enhanced interface determination.In which scenarios we have to use them?
Where we can use these features and whom they can replace?
Regards,
Anoop

Hi Anoop
have alook at thses URl's also
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/43/01322a7af25285e10000000a1553f7/frameset.htm
:Dynamic file and variable substitution
Similarly Extended Receiver determination is used to determine the receiver at runtime.
Refer my reply:Re: Condition In Receiver Determination Not Working
enhancement in ID
Enhanced Receiver Determination:
You use an enhanced receiver determination to have a mapping program determine the receivers of the message dynamically at runtime. Instead of creating the receivers in the receiver determination manually, you assign a mapping to the receiver determination and this returns a list of receivers at runtime.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/43/a5f2066340332de10000000a11466f/content.htm
Enhanced (Mapping-Based) Interface Determination
In an enhanced interface determination you do not enter the inbound interfaces manually, but instead first select a multi-mapping. You get the inbound interfaces from the target interfaces of the multi-mapping. The inbound interfaces are determined at runtime during the mapping step.
You typically use an enhanced interface determination if the source message has an element with occurrence 0 ... unbounded (for multiple items of a data record) and you want multiple messages (for the individual items) to be generated at runtime.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/42/ed364cf8593eebe10000000a1553f7/frameset.htm
enhanced interface determination
/people/robin.schroeder/blog/2006/11/15/using-dynamic-receiver-determination-with-sync-interface
/people/venkataramanan.parameswaran/blog/2006/03/17/illustration-of-enhanced-receiver-determination--sp16
List of receivers can be dyamically determined and assigned at runtime using enhanced receiver determination .
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/43/a5f2066340332de10000000a11466f/content.htm
Thanks
Pls reward if useful

Extended receiver determination and Dynamic attributes

Hello,
is it possible to access dynamic attributes within an extended receiver determination? Can I modify / set dynamic attributes of an XI message within an UDF in the extended receiver determination mapping?
In detail: In my scenario I want to use an extended rec. determination, make a lookup in a DB inside the determination in order to define the receiver, and based on the lookup result I want to add some information as dynamic attributes to the XI message, which then can be accessed in the interface determination as conditions.
Thanks,
Chris

Hi,
In my scenario I want to use an extended rec. determination, make a lookup in a DB inside the determination in order to define the receiver, and based on the lookup result I want to add some information as dynamic attributes to the XI message, which then can be accessed in the interface determination as conditions - See you can do a DB lookup in a msg mapping........but by the time you have reached msg mapping your receiver determination will be done......so your receiver is already decided............Extended recever determination is for dynamically choosing a recever based on source msg's data.........
Regards,
Rajeev Gupta

Extended Receiver & Extended Interface Determination

Hi Experts,
Can any tell me what is Extended Receiver & Extended Interface Determination.
And the Difference between Standard Receiver & Standard Interface Determination.
were to use Extended Receiver & Extended Interface Determination.
Thanks in advance
Shakif

Hi,
Standard Receiver Determination Features
Specifying Receivers
You can specify receiver parties and receiver services. To specify the receiver in more detail, you have the following options:
● Select the receiver from the Integration Directory
● Specify a constant value for the receiver
● Determine the receiver dynamically from the message content
To enter the necessary details, use the following:
● The party editor for specifying the receiver party
● The service editor for specifying the receiver service
To call the relevant editor, in the Display/Edit Receiver Determination editor in the Configured Receivers frame, call the Input Help ( ) in either the Party or Service column.
Defining Conditions
You also have the option of specifying the conditions to be applied when forwarding a message to the receiver(s) in a receiver determination.
Generally, a condition relates to the contents of a message; if a specified condition is fulfilled for a particular payload element (the corresponding element has a certain value, for example), then the message is forwarded to the specified receiver(s).
● If you want to specify a new condition for forwarding the message to a receiver, in the table in the Display/Edit Receiver Determination editor in the Configured Receivers frame, choose Insert New Condition () and call the condition editor by using the input help ().
● If you want to specify a new condition for forwarding the message to multiple receivers, in the table in the Display/Edit Receiver Determination editor in the Configured Receivers frame, choose Insert Line After Selection ( ) and call the condition editor by using the input help ().
In the condition editor, you can select an element from the message payload and specify a value with which the value of this element is to be compared at runtime.
Enhanced Receiver Determination
Use
You use an enhanced receiver determination to have a mapping program determine the receivers of the message dynamically at runtime. Instead of creating the receivers in the receiver determination manually, you assign a mapping to the receiver determination and this returns a list of receivers at runtime.
A typical usage case is if you do not yet know the names of the receivers at configuration time. In this case, you can define a mapping program, for example, which reads a list of receivers from a table or from the payload of the message at runtime.
You can of course formulate conditions in a standard receiver determination that relate to the content of the message. However, you have to specify the names of the receivers (to which the message is sent under the formulated condition) explicitly in the receiver determination. If you create an enhanced receiver determination, you do not have to specify receiver names at this stage.
Integration
During the definition of the interface mapping, you assign the abstract message interface ReceiverDetermination as the target interface. The message interface ReceiverDetermination is in the Integration Repository in the software component SAP BASIS (namespace http://sap.com/xi/XI/System).
The message interface uses the message type Receivers and the data type Receivers. The data type Receivers describes a list of receivers and has the following structure:
The following instance of the data type Receivers contains two receivers. The first receiver comprises a party and service and is identified by a DUNS number; the second receiver comprises a service without a party.
<Receivers>
<Receiver>
 <Party agency=016 scheme=DUNS>123456789</Party>
 <Service>MyService</Service>
</Receiver>
<Receiver>
 <Party agency=http://sap.com/xi/XI scheme=XIParty></Party>
 <Service>ABC_200</Service>
</Receiver>
</Receivers>
You can specify party and service for each receiver.
Activities
 1. Integration Repository: Define the interface mapping. Assign the message interface ReceiverDetermination as the target interface (see above).
 2. Integration Repository: Define the message mapping or mapping program that is to determine the receivers at runtime. Assign the message mapping or mapping program to the interface mapping.
 3. Integration Directory: Define an (enhanced) receiver determination.
○ Enter the outbound interface of the interface mapping from step 1 in the key of the receiver determination as the outbound interface.
○ Assign the interface mapping created in step 1 to the receiver determination.
Standard Interface Determination
Use
You can specify to which inbound interfaces at the receiver the message is to be sent at runtime. You also have the option of specifying a mapping and (when multiple inbound interfaces are defined) a condition for each inbound interface.
Note the following fundamental cases when assigning multiple inbound interfaces:
Multiple Different Inbound Interfaces
Imagine you enter the following interface assignment.
Inbound Interface
Condition
Interface Mapping
IF_1
M_1
IF_2
M_2
After the interface determination is evaluated, this results in two messages with the same payload at runtime. A different mapping (either M1 or M_2) is executed for both messages and then they are forwarded to the two interfaces (either IF_1 or IF_2) at the receiver.
Multiple Identical Inbound Interfaces with Conditions
Imagine you enter the following interface assignment.
Inbound Interface
Condition
Interface Mapping
IF_1
B_1
M_1
IF_1
B_2
M_2
In this case, the conditions are evaluated during the interface determination step. If condition B_1 is true, then mapping M_1 is executed; if condition B_2 is true, then mapping M_2 is executed. The message is forwarded to the same inbound interface at the receiver in both cases. Unlike in the case described above, this does not result in multiple messages with the same payload because only one condition can ever be true at runtime.
Features
You enter the assignment between the outbound interface and the inbound interface(s) in a table. Each table line represents exactly one assignment between the outbound interface and an inbound interface. To insert or delete lines, choose Insert One Line After Selection () or Delete Selected Line ().
Enhanced (Mapping-Based) Interface Determination
Use
In an enhanced interface determination you do not enter the inbound interfaces manually, but instead first select a multi-mapping. You get the inbound interfaces from the target interfaces of the multi-mapping. The inbound interfaces are determined at runtime during the mapping step.
You typically use an enhanced interface determination if the source message has an element with occurrence 0 ... unbounded (for multiple items of a data record) and you want multiple messages (for the individual items) to be generated at runtime.
For example, you want to split an overall booking for a trip comprising connecting flights into individual booking orders (for each leg of the trip).
You cannot realize this usage case with a standard interface determination (without using an integration process). A standard interface determination does allow you to specify multiple (N) inbound interfaces (with different mapping). In this case, N messages with the same payload and different receiver interfaces are generated from the source message before the mapping step; these are then transformed differently depending on the receiver interface. Therefore it is conceivable to write the mappings in such a way that the first mapping from the source message generates a message that only contains the first item, the second mapping generates a messages that only contains the second item, and so on. However, this no longer works if the number of items can vary with each new source message.
You can use an enhanced interface determination to configure a mapping-based message split for this usage case. You assign the interface determination a multi-mapping that has a target interface with an element with occurrence 0...unbounded. At runtime, the individual messages (for the individual items) are calculated in the mapping step. First, the individual messages are grouped into a bulk message. Then, the bulk message is transferred to the Adapter Engine. The Adapter Engine then splits the bulk message up into the individual messages (see figure).
Procedure at Runtime During Message Split
Note that both the bulk message and all individual messages each have a message header with a receiver interface (see figure).
Receiver Interfaces of Bulk Messages and Individual Messages
The header of the individual messages contains the relevant receiver interface. It is based on the definition of the multi-mapping. Note that the receiver interfaces of the individual messages may be different. The receiver interface of the bulk message is always InterfaceCollection (namespace http://sap.com/xi/XI/System).
If the message split only results in one message, the original message structure remains the same. In this case, a bulk message containing just one individual message is not created.
You can also assign a multi-mapping with multiple different target interfaces to an enhanced interface determination (1:n transformation). Each target interface can contain elements with occurrence 0 ... unbounded.
Messages cannot be sent by using different Adapter Engines in a mapping-based message split. This affects configuration thus: All receiver agreements that have a receiver interface from the mapping entered in the key must only be assigned communication channels with the following adapter types:
- RFC Adapter
- SAP Business Connector Adapter
- File/FTP Adapter
- JDBC Adapter
- JMS Adapter
- SOAP adapter
- Marketplace adapter
- Mail Adapter
- RNIF adapter
- CIDX Adapter
The adapters also have to all run on the same Adapter Engine.
Adapters developed by partners also support a mapping-based message split if they run on the same Adapter Engine.
Attachments from the original message are not appended to the messages resulting from the message split.
Activities
To execute a mapping-based message split, perform the following steps:
 1. Integration Repository: Define the multi-mapping (see Developing Multi-Mappings for Message Splits).
 2. Integration Directory: Define the interface determination.
Note the following:
○ The outbound interface of the multi-mapping must be entered as the sender interface in the key of the interface determination.
○ The interface determination type must be set to Enhanced.
○ Select the multi-mapping you defined previously from the Integration Repository.
To do so, call input help ().
The target interfaces of the interface mapping are displayed in the Inbound Interfaces frame.
The number of messages (for an inbound interface) created in the mapping step is displayed in the Occurrence column.
Regards,
Phani
Reward points if Helpful

Receiver determination(or Interface determination) and conditional routing

I have a flat file to flat file scenario. Based on the input file content, I want to route data to the receiver.
My source flat file contains several IDOC details. Assume two fields FIELD1 and FIELD2 in different segments of the IDOC. My requirement is if FIELD1 of an IDOC = "US" and FIELD2 of the same IDOC = "CA", then that IDOC's details needs to be passed to the receiver.
I have implemented the above condition at interface determination.
But the problem is:
Assume there are 3 idocs in the input file.
FIELD1 of IDOC[1] = 'US' and FIELD2 of IDOC[1] = 'GL'
FIELD1 of IDOC[2] = 'UK' and FIELD2 of IDOC[2] = 'EN'
FIELD1 of IDOC[3] = 'BR' and FIELD2 of IDOC[3] = 'CA' .
Now none of the IDOCs in the input satisfy my requirement and hence the message mapping should not be called at all. But in my case its failing because FIELD1 of IDOC[1] and FIELD2 of IDOC[3] together are satisfying the condition and hence the message mapping is called.
But I need to check this condition IDOCwise. Both the conditions to be satisfies in the same IDOC.
I am thinking that contexts are not being taken care.. It just see the whole file together and not IDOCwise.
Can someone help me on the same. Please let me know if more information is required.
Thanks,
Shobha

>
Shobha HB wrote:
> I have a flat file to flat file scenario. Based on the input file content, I want to route data to the receiver.
>
> My source flat file contains several IDOC details. Assume two fields FIELD1 and FIELD2 in different segments of the IDOC. My requirement is if FIELD1 of an IDOC = "US" and FIELD2 of the same IDOC = "CA", then that IDOC's details needs to be passed to the receiver.
>
> I have implemented the above condition at interface determination.
>
> But the problem is:
> Assume there are 3 idocs in the input file.
> FIELD1 of IDOC[1] = 'US' and FIELD2 of IDOC[1] = 'GL'
> FIELD1 of IDOC[2] = 'UK' and FIELD2 of IDOC[2] = 'EN'
> FIELD1 of IDOC[3] = 'BR' and FIELD2 of IDOC[3] = 'CA' .
>
> Now none of the IDOCs in the input satisfy my requirement and hence the message mapping should not be called at all. But in my case its failing because FIELD1 of IDOC[1] and FIELD2 of IDOC[3] together are satisfying the condition and hence the message mapping is called.
>
> But I need to check this condition IDOCwise. Both the conditions to be satisfies in the same IDOC.
>
> I am thinking that contexts are not being taken care.. It just see the whole file together and not IDOCwise.
>
> Can someone help me on the same. Please let me know if more information is required.
>
> Thanks,
> Shobha
The ideal solution to your scenario is to redesign the interface as below;
1. Receive the file.
2. Do a 1: N mapping (this should split your message into multiple Messages)
3. On this message you can do the required check. Now only the required field for the particular IDoc will be part of the check and it will not mix with other Idocs.
Will this do? Else please provide more details

Extended Receiver Determinatipon and Interface Determination?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for