Extended Scenario: which BE Purch Org & Purch Group ? :-(

Hi guys,
Im using SRM 4.0 sp7 (Extended Scenario), Ill have several companies in my Org. structure.. but, I have a question:
Right now, all my PO documents have just one BE Purch Org and Puch Grp. Obviously, I need to change this according to every Company Code.
Is this possible ? Is this an error in my config ? Or, Is this the extended scenario standard behavior ?
Thanks for your help !!!! =)
REgards,
Diego

Diego
It seems you have created only one purch org and assigned to one company code. that may be the reason why all PO documents refer to that company code.
Create a Purch org and Purch group for each company code with corresponding backend assignment. Then for each purch group enter the responsible organization unit and product categories in the Responsibility tab. Then check if correct company code and purch grp is picking in the PO document.
Hope it should solve your issue.
Reward points to the helpful answer.
Thanks
Jagdish

Similar Messages

Extended Classic Scenario PPOMA_Purchasing Org and Group

Hi gurus,
We are working with SRM 5.5 and we are having problems with the assignments for the Purchasing organization and Purchasing groups in the PPOMA.
In the documentation it says we should have one box for the R3 Purchasing Organization (flagged and referred to the backend POrg) and one for the Local Purchasing Organization (flagged but NOT referred to the backend POrg). The same for the Purchasing Groups, the one under R3 POrg will be flagged and referred to the PGroup in R3 and the one under the Local POrg will have the flag but it will not be referred to the backend PGroup.
Afterwards, in the attributes for the Local POrg and Local PGroup, with the attributes PURCH_ORGX and PURCH_GRPX the local and the R3 POrg and PGroup will be assigned each other.
The purchasers will be located in the Local PGroup. The R3 POrg and PGroup will never have users assigned.
The problem is that all the workflow is only working if the "Local" POrg and Group have the backend purchasing organization and purch group assigned in the Function Tab. This means that the 2 boxes for R3 are no longer necessary. In the documentation it says that this version of SRM needs both boxes for the POrgs and the 2 boxes for the PGroups. We have flagged the Extended Classic Scenario.
Any help on this? It's because of the version?
Many thanks and regards,
I will give Points!

Hi Ana
PURCH_GRP     Purchasing group     Number of an organizational unit that is indicated as local purchasing group in the organizational plan.
This attribute is simulated. You define an organizational unit as company on the Function tab.
PURCH_GRPX     R/3 purchasing group     Number of an organizational unit that is indicated as the R/3 purchasing group in the organizational plan. The value contains the ID and the associated backend system of a backend purchasing group.
This attribute is simulated. You define the ID and the associated system on the Function tab.
PURCH_ORG      Purchasing organization     Number of an organizational unit that is indicated as local purchasing organization in the organizational plan.
This attribute is simulated. You define an organizational unit as purchasing organization on the Function tab.
PURCH_ORGX     R/3 purchasing organization     Number of an organizational unit that is indicated as the R/3 purchasing organization in the organizational plan.
This attribute is simulated. You define the ID and the associated system on the Function tab.
can you elaborate more?
in ECS also we can map the backend purchase organisation/ purchase group for purchasing activity.
there might be a resposibilty tab for the backend purchase group might be mapped the responsible purchaser list (dept).plz check it up
regards
Muthu
regards
Muthu

Different Purch Org & Purch Group is shown when PR is transferred to SRM

Experts,
We are facing a strange problem,
A user is creating a PR in R3 under specific Purch org. We have configured to transfer the PR to SRM to carry out the sourcing activity. So that PR reaches in the sourcing cockpit but with different Purch org & Purch group. Even that user is not assiged under that purch group & purch org in SRM.
No BADI's is implemented. The user Specific Purch org exist in the SRM and user is assigned to it at ppoma_bbp.
Any solution for this.. Please
Thanks

Hello Anand,
I assume you are using SRM 70 or above here. PR transfer from ERP to SRM Sourcing Cockpit is handled by Badi in ERP ME_REQ_SOURCING_CUST , where based on the logic written for the purchasing pr will be transferred to SOCO else PR will be available in the CPPR application.
Also the transfer will happen by PI where a technical user called as Integration user will be used, which will also be assigned to the PPOMA in SRM under the purchasing unit.
With the successful PR transfer to SRM , a shopping cart will be created in the SRM system automatically with the Integration user and the same grp will be carried forward to the Draft RFx creation in SOCO. But the user will have the option to change the purchasing group based on his needs.
It will not be depend on the logged in user purchasing grp and org.
Hope this answer your query here.
Best Regards,
Rahul

Using BAdI BBP_PGRP_FIND for purch.group determination

Hello all
For normal sc items I'd like to have one single purchasing group being determined during sc creation (by default).
Except for described req. items, the purch. group should be determined using the normal logic based on product category and its logical backend system.
I thought it would be fairly easy to achieve this, but the bad thing is, that when activating BAdI BBP_PGRP_FIND it automatically deactivates the standard logic which would be the one needed in case of described requirements.
So I'm searching how to implement BAdI BBP_PGRP_FIND in a way where I can run the standard purch. group determination logic for described requirement items but to run own new determination logic for all other sc items.
EDIT
In other words:
IF described req.
do normal standard determination logic
ELSE.
assign single default purch.org./purch.grp.
ENDIF.
Somebody an idea on this one? Is there a function module / method I can call from within the BAdI to run the standard determination logic?
Thanks for any helpful input.
Renaud

Me again... after some further investigations I found function module BBP_OM_FIND_SC. It returns a list of found purchasing org. / groups responsible for a specified user, product category and logical backend system.
Hope this helps someone else one day...
Kind regards,
Renaud

Enter Purch. group. . . .

Hi All,
While CIFing Purchase Orders from APO to R3, i am recieving error which says,
"Enter Purch. group"
As far i think, is this something to do with the SPRO settings at R3 side ??
If so, please let me know the exact path of as to where this setting is to be mainatined . . .
Awaiting for Suggestions.Please help.
Regards,
Prasad.

Hi prasad,
Purchasing group is defined in spro setting under the below menupath
spro > SAP customising implementation guide > Materials management > Purchasing > Vendor master > create purchasing groups
Please check and confirm
Regards
R. Senthil Mareeswaran.

Table linking company code /purchase org/purchase group

Hello All,
Please provide me the table(s) which can provide me a link between company code /purchase org/purchase group.
Thanks a lot.

Hello Ryan,
Don't know exactly what you want to do, but tables HRP5500 and HRT5500 give you data from 'Function' tab assigned to organizational units in PPOSA_BBP transaction (see also view HRV5500A ).
Maybe it could help you.
Other solution is to use function module BBP_OM_DETERMINE_RESP_PGRP with importing parameter IV_ORGUNIT = organizational unit ID defined as company (with 'Function' tab in PPOSA_BBP ): you will get all purch. group. (and their corresponding purch. org.) for this company code.
Regards.
Laurent.

Error while transfering PO in extended Scenario -- error 06 053 in R/3

Hi,
while transfering a PO from SRM to R/3 in extended Scenario we get an error in RZ20(SRM):
"No selectable items exist for purchase requisition xxx" --> error number 06 053
Whats happening here?
The PR is released in R/3 and yet not transfered into another PO.
Material and Material Group are the same, there is no contract involved and no differences within PO to PR.
Any ideas how to solve this problem?
Thanks and best regards
Andreas

Hi muthu,
thanks, that seems not to be the problem.
By using the fbgendat report in backend I found out, that R/3 seems to interprete my SRM PO as a local PO?!
Might there be a problem in SRM when calling the function module BBP_PO_BAPI_STATE within method set_po_bapi_state_in_be (class CL_BBP_BS_ADAPTER_PO_CRT)?
Seems R/3 does not interprete my PO out of SRM as a SRM PO?
Does the RFC User needs additional roles for setting the BAPI_PO_STATE in R/3? (the RFC User does not have sap_all in R/3!)
Best regards
Andreas

I am a researcher looking for raw, ungrouped crash data. Specifically, I am looking for crash thread information which has yet to be grouped.

I am a researcher looking for raw, ungrouped crash data. Specifically, I am looking for crash thread information which has yet to be grouped.

I do not know the answer,but until you get a better answer try the links
*http://code.google.com/p/google-breakpad/
*http://socorro.readthedocs.org/en/latest/index.html
*https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/tools-socorro

Transfer PO Conditions to R/3 in Extended Scenario (SRM 5.0)

Hi all,
We are using SRM 5.0 Extended Scenario.
For controlling reasons we would like to transfer the whole conditions scheme (PO) from SRM to R/3 as well, so you could see the price calculation with rebates etc. in the R/3 position as well.
I have done some steps based on forum suggestions but still i have some doubts.
1. I have implemented the badi BBP_DRIVER_DETERMINE.
2. I have copied the function module B46B_DPO_TRANSFER into
ZB46B_DPO_TRANSFER
3. In that ZB46B_DPO_TRANSFER function module I have added the following
coding also.
DATA: BEGIN OF wa_pocondheader.
INCLUDE STRUCTURE bbp_bapimepocond.
DATA: change_id TYPE c,
END OF wa_pocondheader.
DATA: lt_bapi_pocondheader LIKE TABLE OF wa_pocondheader.
DATA: wa_bapi_pocond LIKE wa_pocondheader.
DATA: lt_bapi_pocond LIKE TABLE OF wa_bapi_pocond.
4. I have modified the following code in my ZB46B_DPO_TRANSFER
function module
CALL FUNCTION 'BBP_PO_INBOUND' DESTINATION lv_destination
EXPORTING
poheader = ls_bapi_poheader
poaddrvendor = ls_bapi_poaddrvendor
no_messaging = c_on
poheader_ext = ls_bapi_poheader_ext
IMPORTING
expheader = es_expheader
TABLES
return = lt_bapi_return
poitem = lt_bapi_poitem
poaddrdelivery = lt_bapi_poaddrdelivery
poschedule = lt_bapi_poschedule
poaccount = lt_bapi_poaccount
polimits = lt_bapi_polimits
poservices = lt_bapi_poservices
posrvaccessvalues = lt_bapi_posrvaccessvalues
poservicestext = lt_bapi_poservices_text
potextheader = lt_bapi_poheader_text
potextitem = lt_bapi_poitem_text
poitem_ext = lt_bapi_poitem_ext
popartner = lt_bapi_popartner
customer_fields = lt_bapi_customer_fields
pocondheader = lt_bapi_pocondheader
pocond = lt_bapi_pocond
EXCEPTIONS
communication_failure = 1 MESSAGE lv_msg_text
system_failure = 2 MESSAGE lv_msg_text
OTHERS = 3.
I need some advise how to fill in my SRM conditions correctly into the new table (lt_bapi_pocondheader, lt_bapi_pocond) in my ZB46B_DPO_TRANSFER function module so that R/3 is able to generate the conditions within my PO positions.
So Please suggest how to do this.
Note: If anybody is having code for this please share that will be very helpful for me.
Thanks and Regards,
Natchiappan.M

Hi Natchiappan.M,
Have you found any solution of how to read condition types and fill.
Actually i have the same requirement so please let me know if you found some solution for the same.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Hemant

Creating Custom fields which are sales org dependent in Accounts Master

Hello Experts,
I want to create new custom fields in Accounts Master for sales and shipping.The component being used is BP_SALES.However when I try to create custom fields through AET, the new fields are added in the BUILHEADER context node.The problem with this is, its making the fields Sales Org independent.
I want to add the fields which are sales org dependent( i.e. want to add the fields for the context nodes BUILSHIPPINGTERMS and BUILSALESARRANGEMENT).
Please help me in this regards,
Thanks and Regards,
Rahim
Edited by: Abdul Rahim on Dec 27, 2010 9:55 AM

Hi Rahim,
in general extension fields for Business Partner are only supported for the header fields (Table BUT000). Therefore the AET does not offer this.
Table extension for BP sales data is supported by the AET beginning from CRM 7.0 eHP1. If you have this you can just create a 1:1 table enhancements and should be happy. If not I'm afraid that you would have to implement this manually.
Using the Easy Enhancement Workbench (EEW) it would only be possible to create table extensions for the header and for relation ship but not for sales data.
Regards Matthias

Why can't i install the adobe acrobat pro extended 9 which i just downloaded?

why can't install the adobe acrobat pro extended 9 which i have just downloaded?

Nobody can know without some system info and a better explanation of what exactly you do...
Mylenium

Report to get the materials extended to which plants

Hi All,
Is there any report to get material which is extended to which plants?
Regarda,
pandu.

Hi,
Check whether the D/B table MARC is useful for your scenarion.
Regards,
Satya

In which tables the GL account group field KTOKS

Hi,
From which tables the GL account group field KTOKS get
Regards,
Siva

hi
DKOKS                            Open Item Account Balance Au
DSKOS                            Balance Audit Trail
SKA1                             G/L Account Master (Chart of
T077S                            G/L account groups
T077Z                            Account Group Names (Table T
regds
laks.

How to configure a scenario which posts same file to different directories

How to configure a scenario which posts same file to different directories of a receiving system?
Consider an Idoc to file scenario where I have to post same file to two different directories but logical receiver system has to be same.

Hi,
You can try out like this: Using multiple receiver interfaces you can send it to multiple directories with the help of enhanced interface determination/conditions and with the help of multiple receiver communication channels.
Another option is to copy the file from one target directory into another directory with the help of Unix script by executing the same from the OS command level.
One more option is to create a Java Server Proxy and inside the proxy, you can write java code to FTP into different locations.
Hope this helps,
Regards,
Moorthy

Want to buy airport extreme, am using mountain lion. Will this work ? also, my house is 5,500 square feet all on one floor. Do I need an extender and which one?

want to buy airport extreme, am using mountain lion. Will this work ? also, my house is 5,500 square feet all on one floor. Do I need an extender and which one?

... If I purchase an express to extend is it hard to configure as an extender?
No, AirPort Utility prompts you with step-by-step questions and makes configuration simple.
The Express and Extreme have the same transmitter power specifications, so I suggest the $99 Express as an extender, should you need one. Beware that you cannot add a second Express to wirelessly extend the network any further - as the following excerpt from Extending the range of your wireless network by adding additional Wi-Fi base stations explains:
Extended network range considerations
In the above example the primary Wi-Fi base station ➊ is out of wireless range of the extended Wi-Fi base station ➋, therefore the extended Wi-Fi base station cannot join or extend the wireless network. The extended Wi-Fi base station must be moved to a location that is within Wi-Fi range of the primary Wi-Fi base station.
Important Note
If another extended Wi-Fi base station ➋ is placed between the primary Wi-Fi base station ➊ and the extended Wi-Fi base station ➌, the extended Wi-Fi base station ➌ will not allow clients to join it. All extended Wi-Fi base stations must be in direct range of the primary Wi-Fi base station.
A "roaming network" that Bob described, in which all base stations are connected with an Ethernet cable, is by far the best alternative.

Extended Scenario: which BE Purch Org & Purch Group ? :-(

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for