Extending 200 GLs from COA to company code level at one go

Hello All,
Wanted to know if there is any way of extending a list of GLs from COA level to company code level at one go?
I had copied about 300 GLs at COA level using OBA7 and now want to extend about 200 of them to a company code. Is there any transaction code with which I can copy/extend all these 200 GLs to the company code?
jw

thanks Murali_Babu. N for your reply. I vaguely remember reading somewhere that you can use OBY7 to copy GLs from an existing COA to a new COA and then extend the required GLs from the new COA to a company code. I did the first step using OBY7 but then forgot what is to be done next. Thanks to you both, now I know we can do it with LSMW and also  BDC but wanted to know if there is any way by which I can continue with OBY7 and any other tcode.
thanks.

Similar Messages

  • Upload of chart of accounts at coa and company code level

    dear all
    can you tell me how it is best to upload a new chart of accounts both as a chart of accounts level and company code. i am planning to use lsmw but shoud i upload chart of accounts first then company code level?
    with many thanks
    Peter

    Hello Peter,
    If you have single company code then create one LSMW for transaction "FS00" it upload the COA both at company code and COA level. If you have morethan one company code and you want to upload same COA to both company codes then better first COA level with FSP0 then company code level with FSS0 because here you can extend the required GL's from COA to COmpany code.
    Regards
    Swapna

  • Copying G/L accounts from COA to Company code

    Hello Experts,
    Can anyone tell me how to Copy (Extend) G/L accounts from Chart of Accounts to Company code. I am aware of creating the G/L accounts using FSP0, FSS0 and FS00. But I want to know how to copy large number of G/L accounts from COA to Co.cd in one shot.
    Regards,
    Sriram

    Hi ashish,
    Can you please send it me?
    [email protected]
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    A.Anandarajan.

  • Need Table linkage from Material to Company Code

    Hi Folks,
    Please let me know incase there is any list or table which can show us all the materials assigned to the respective company codes.. I know MARC can give to Plant linkage, but I need for Company Code level..
    Please suggest.
    Regards,
    Guru

    Hi ,
    Materials are maintained under plant , purchage organization, Sales organization etc
    This is applicable only if Plant is maintained as Valuation area,
    1) Material is maintained under Plant code( Take your Material code pass this material code into MARC fetch Werks (Plant--Valuation area))
    2) Plant is assigned to company code ( Pass this Valuation area into Table T001K and Fetch company code BURKS )
    Like this you can use a logic to fetch the company code for each Material codes.
    Regards,
    Vijaykumar P

  • Transport of Chart of Account at Company Code Level

    Hi,
    I see in IMG, we can only transport the whole Chart of Account(COA). Is there any way to transport the COA at the company code level?
    Thanks,
    CW

    Hi,
    OBY2 is copy form company code for chart of accounts. What I need is to transport chart of account at company code level from one client to another client.
    Rgds,
    CW

  • Client level , company code level , chart of account level

    Hi experts
    Pls expline me which are we define under client level , company code level and COA level
    like :
    1) field status variant:
    2) Dunning procedure:
    3) document types:
    4) doc.number range:
    4) posting periods variant
    5) controlling area
    6) account groups
    7) vendor/cust master data
    8) dep key
    9) chart of dep area
    10) like...............................
    get points
    Geeta

    hi geeta,
    ClientA Client is the highest unit within an SAP system and contains Master records and Tables. Data entered at this level are valid for all company code data and organizational structures allowing for data consistency. User access and authorizations are assigned to each client created. Users must specify which client they are working in at the point of logon to the SAP system.
    A CompanyA Company is the unit to which your financial statements are created and can have one to many company codes assigned to it. A company is equivalent to your legal business organization. Consolidated financial statements are based on the companyu2019s financial statements. Companies are defined in configuration and assigned to company codes. Each company code must use the same COA( Chart of Accounts) and Fiscal Year. Also note that local currency for the company can be different.
    Company CodesCompany Codes are the smallest unit within your organizational structure and is used for internal and external reporting purposes. Company Codes are not optional within SAP and are required to be defined. Financial transactions are viewed at the company code level. Company Codes can be created for any business organization whether national or international. It is recommended that once a Company Code has been defined in Configuration with all the required settings then other company codes later created should be copied from the existing company code. You can then make changes as needed. This reduces repetitive input of information that does not change from company code to company code as well as eliminate the possibility of missed data input.
    Business Area Business Area is optional and is equivalent to a specific area of responsibility within your company or business segment. BA (Business Area) also allows for internal and external reporting.
    Another configuration requirement for set-up in SAP are the Basic settings consisting of the following:
    Chart of Accounts(COA)
    Fiscal Year Variants.
    Currencies
    The COA(Chart of Accounts)
    The COA(Chart of Accounts) lists all General Ledger accounts that are used by the organization. It is assigned in configuration to each company code and allows for daily General Ledger postings.
    Fiscal Year configuration
    Fiscal Year configuration is a must and can be defined to meet your companyu2019s reporting periods whether Fiscal (any period combination that is not calendar) or Calendar( Jan-Dec).
    Posting Periods are defined and assigned to the Fiscal Year.
    Within the periods you specify start dates and finished dates.
    SAP allows for 12 posting periods along with specially defined periods that can be used for year-end financial closing.
    Rohit Agrawal

  • Manage vendor bank account in company code level - Best practice

    hi,
    we have on our client several company codes, and we are thinking how to manage the vendor bank accounts in company codes level or in centeral level.
    our problem with company codes level is that the vendor bank accounts define in a centeral level so technically with sap standard it is not possible. if anyone can tell me that this is possible i will be very happy to know.
    in centeral level our problem is with the business process because of we do not have a person (functionalism ) that can be responsible for all the company codes, basically every company shoule be responsible for her vendors
    please advice what is the best practice to manage vendor bank accounts in enviroment of several company code
    regards,
    meir

    hi Raghu,
    i know that but this is not my qusition.
    which company code will be responsible to enter the bank account in the vendor master data? as i say the vendor bank accounts manage in centeral level and not in company code level and this is our problem and i like to know how other companies with the same situation handle with this issue
    and also after we have the bank accounts in the vendor master data what happend if for one vendor has several bank accounts one for every company code? how the payment program F110 could know automaticaly which bank account to take (i know that there is an optoin to use Partner bank type in the vendor master data, and enter this PBT when posting the invoice of the vednor, but this is not good because of we do not want the the accountant will be responsible from which bank the vendor get his money).
    regards,
    meir

  • Customer-based BP role, Company Code level data

    System ECC 5.0.
    May be somebody can help me in a problem with Company code level data for BP.
    I'm trying to create new BP in custom Z role (created by me), on company code data screen I cannot set "Company Code Is Valid for Customer" indicator on company code selection dialog box.
    I use custom Z role with assigned custom Z rolecategory (with active BP-customer syncronizaton), It seems that there is a missing setting in SPRO for rolecategory that activate possibility to enter company code data.....

    After some investigation.... the problem was not in customising, but in some requirements from code: BP role should have the same name as s BP rolecategory. After renaming it goes.

  • Material valuation at company code level

    Hi,
    We have the valuation at company code level and when we transfer material from one plant to another (Two step stock transfer) the system dont post  fi document. When the profit center of the material is assign an fi document is posted. Somebody knows why?
    Thanks
    Edited by: Elisabete Cuellar on Jul 27, 2010 11:56 AM

    you have valuation at company code level.
    both plants are in same company code, so same valuation level, so no FI document created , the FI docuement not required here
    For profit center, FI document will be ceated for that profit center.
    This is standard process only

  • Payment block non editable on the basis of company code level

    Dear Gurus,
    we had made payment block "A" non editable in payment praposal through transaction code ob27.as per reqeust from
    our partent company in India but our subsidiary in France wants the payment block "a"  to be editable (to be insert
    payment block "a" in document to make document deselect). Is it possible to make payment block editable on the basis of
    company code level.
    Regards,
    Rajesh

    Hi,
    In this scenario, you need to have a NEW Payment block key like Z. Create Z with reference to A in OB27.
    For Z, you need to select check box Change in Payment Proposal and SAVE.
    Now maintain this Z in vendor masters of company code, where you want the payment block can be edited.
    Note: Payment Block codes are not company code dependent.
    Regards,
    SRinu

  • OKP1 - period lock on company code level

    Hi all,
    I wonder if anybody can help me with this issue.
    Is there an alternative transaction (or any other way) to OKP1 for locking period only on company code level?
    In standard, OKP1 locks on controlling area level.
    The only way which comes on my mind is to set a new validation rule.
    Thanks a lot
    Regards
    Peter

    Hello Peter,
    we are very interested in this issue.
    For our project we also plan to have an assignment from 7 company codes to one controlling area and we also want to control the closing by company code.
    Now we read your thread about this issue and try to work out how you have designed the validation step (OKC7) to check if one business transaction is only allowed for postings in a single/specific company code at the time.
    We are looking forward to your reply!!
    Kind regards
    Udo

  • Blocking Vendors on Company Code level

    Hi,
    Our Purchasing Organization has multiple Company Codes. Is it possible to block certain vendors for a Particular company code without affecting the other company codes which might be using that vendor??
    What exactly we are trying to do is block all future Purchase orders & Requisitions from being created for a list of Vendors for one company code. We do not want it to affect other Company codes within the same Purchasing Org which might be using the same suppliers.
    I know about XK05 but I think it puts a "Purchasing block" at the Purchasing Org level only and not on the Company code level. Is there any way to achieve this??
    Your inputs are really appreciated.

    Hi Martin,
    If you want to Block the Vendor for a Particular Purchase Organization and Company code then Go to XK05 and Select Vendor Pur Org and Comp Code and in Posting Block tab Activate for Selected Company code and in Purchasing Block tab Activate for Selected Purchase Organization and Save.
    Before this you need to set the following to Error.
    SPRO-MM-Purchasing-Environment data-Define attributes for System messages
    ME 023 Vendor & blocked for purchasing organization &
    ME 024 Vendor & flagged for deletion
    ME 025 Vendor & flagged for deletion for purchasing organization &
    For XK05 Message ME 023 would work.
    Regards,
    Nani.

  • KPSI (RKNMABTC) on company code level

    Hello,
    I would like to ask, if somebody of you have already tried following:
    We would like to run the KPSI (Plan reconciliation / target = actual-IAA) on company code level. It is possible e.g. if create an appropriate cost center group. The problem is, that if the KPSI already runs for other company code, error message KI718 appears.
    Error message KI718: "Planning locked by user &1. User  is planning in controlling area XXXX, version XXX . Thus, plan reconciliation with update posting is not possible."
    That means, that it is not possible to run two or more parallel plan reconciliations, it they refer to the same controlling area and version.
    In my opinion this possibility should be offered by SAP, as you can have many companies within the same controlling area, which process their planning for their cost centers independet from the other companies.
    Can anybody of you offer some solution?
    Thanks in advance
    Peter

    Hi Greta
    My interest in this thread has increased, seeing you are from SAP
    Peter was not ref to KSPI, but to KPSI...
    The design of OMIK is such that, you can not execute LTP and KPSI for 2 company codes simultaneouly in all circumstances...
    You have to maintain the parameters in OMIK for one Plant, Run LTP, Delete the entry in OMIK and then again repeat the steps for 2nd company code.... You can refer the OSS msg 1015121 / 2008 that I raised to SAP and the Development Request (DR)  No that I provided earlier in my reply
    In My case, it was one Contr Area and 14 comp codes, so obviously, not possbile to run LTP for all of them at once....
    My only point is when SAP allows and recommends to have one contr area and multi company codes - Then all other transactions including OMIK should permit me to maintain the required parameters at both KOKRS and BUKRS level...
    I would be thankful if you can let me know any updates on the DR no that I mentioned
    Regards
    Ajay M

  • CO-period lock for planning on company code level

    Hello,
    I would like to ask you for assistence.
    We would like to have the possiblity to lock the CO-periods on company code levels. For actual values, it is possible to arrange this within the validation. However, for plan values the validation is not active.
    I have read about possibility to enhance an user exit for paritcular planning transactions (KP06, KP26 etc.), but I can't find it anymore.
    Does anybody from you have experience with this, eventually is there another option?
    Thanks in advance
    Peter

    I have had a similiar problem and contact to remote consulting from SAP. They offered a modification (10-15 days if I remember correctly) to make CO period lock company code depending.
    If I remember correctly, his name was Valentin (in Germany).
    However: if newGL is active with real-time integration and also plan transfer, I think it should be possible to lock in FI.
    regards
    Bjoern

  • F.01 & FBL3N amounts mismatched at Company Code Level

    Hello Gurus,
            At Client side, we are facing problem of mismatch in FBL3N & F.01 Report for some GL accounts and this is at Company Code level not Profit Center or Segment Level.
            I have also verified the Master Data of GLs which are having problem but these accounts master data are same as that of GL accounts having tallied amount in both reports, I have already check on all the posts as this is frequently asked Question but all the replies for those are not given proper solutions.
    Please suggest me for this Error.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Rajdeep.

    Dear Randeep,
    If you are on profit center accounting ECC 6.0. Then Fbl3n cannot be matched with F.01( which runs on profit enter level).
    you need to match F.01 with FAGLL0(Zero)3. provide profit center in dynamic selection and give open item as on as per the period you have provided in F.01.
    This will certainly match.
    kindly provide points, This would solve your issue.
    Ashok kumar

Maybe you are looking for

  • How do I back up my ipod library to disc???

    How do I back up my ipod library to disc???

  • Regd:Purchase Order

    Hi All, My require ment is to Calculate the Vendor Performance Based on Change in Delivery Date (Item Level), Open Qty(Item Level) and Statistics-relevant delivery date (Header Level). For that the field Open Qty - OBMNG is relevant. Pls do suggest m

  • Index error in bin

    Hello people! I just had a project refuse to save any changes I made in the mixer (add new busses etc). From nowhere, I was given the "index error in bin" message, and also "minor change of project data has taken place". There is an archived discussi

  • Missing folder structure in zip file from Theme Editor

    Hi all gurus! I have an interesting problem with this background: I want to change the customer brand image in the portal header and do som other modifications. For this reason I have made a copy of one of the standard portal themes, as I'm supposed

  • Using jsp in webi(BO).

    How can i use Jsp in BusinessObjects Webintelligence tool and for what purpose i can use jsp coding to create reports? Thanks in advance. Rp