External MTC causing system & CPU overloads

Has anyone achieved smooth sync between Logic 8 and an external Midi Time Code (MTC) source?
I'm getting constant system overloads & CPU spikes (even in an empty song). I'm using a relatively powerful Mac Pro (MTC frame rate & tempos are matched), a Unitor 8MKII, pro midi cables etc etc... but it's still unworkable (especially when you hit record!)
(Any ideas or tips would be greatly appreciated)...

Thanks to everyone for their suggestions... though I'm unfortunately still having issues.
Midi & sync connections are all correct (no feedback loops). MTC only being received, not transmitted. Buffer settings seem to have little effect (as does the 'Freewheel' option) or the Validate MTC options.
Firmware on the Unitor 8 MkII is version 2.0.2, and although I've seen reports of a version 2.0.4, I've yet to track it down (I presume the 2.0.2 version was included on my Logic 8 install disks).
I'm trying to sync my Akai MPC 3000 to Logic (with MPC as Master) - something I've done many times with previous versions of Logic. Although Logic 8 has withdrawn support for Midi Clock (receive), I have heard that it is still possible for Logic 8 to receive Midi Clock through the IAC Driver Bus, though try as I might, I haven't been able to replicate this (hence resorting to MTC). If anyone has achieved this, I'd be interested in hearing from you!

Similar Messages

Adobe Flash Player 11.5 r502 causes CPU overload

Every time I start my MacBook Air, the fans go to high speed and Adobe Flash Player causes the CPU to run at 300% until I quit that process. Version is 11.5 r502 which has a date 12/11/2012. Problem is that without Adobe Flash Player none of the videos on CNN will play. Is anyone else having this problem? Any fix? Thanks!

I'd recommend trying the troubleshooting steps outlined in this FAQ:
How do I troubleshoot Flash Player's protected mode for Firefox?

Help with Mainstage 3.1 CPU overload issue

I was using Kontakt 5, UVI Workstation and Pianoteq 5 in MainStage 3 without any issues.
Since I updated to MS 3.1, The CPU is always above 100% !!! I am facing audio dropouts and it is absolutely impossible to play a show
Is anyone else facing the same issue? Any tips to help reduce CPU overload will be helpful.
I have Contact and UVI workstation running from an external hard disk. I thought that might be the issue but i tried with a keyboard template set in MS 3.1 and still while playing CPU usage shoots to 100% plus!
I am on a MacBook Pro (Retina, 13-inch, Late 2013), 2.4 GHz Intel Core i5, 8 GB 1600 MHz DDR3.

Try to get the Mainstage 3.0.4 from a timemachine backup.
Try to update all your programs like pianotec.
For me, 3.1 feels better concerning timing/ latency. This might cause more stress for the processors.
My system i7 2,2 GHz is always getting hot, fans go crazy. There's a limit: Better than 64 Samples buffer is not possible.
To be serious: A real Piano needs 0,25ms to produce a sound. We have to deal with 4ms. That's bad. So you could increase buffersize to 128 and try playing? It makes no big difference if you play the poor 4ms ore poor 6ms for example. In every case we are far away from the real thing.
Check, if you activated the "savety buffer" checkbox in audiodriver window.
If you can't find 3.0.4., you could try to reduce the installed channelstrips in your patches. Effects in concert level should be reduced. Evt. you have Efx in busses that are not needed in most patches. So cancel them in concertlevel and install them in selected patches.
I replaced a spacedesigner reverb with an reverb outside the system, it's processed from the interface. Same with a chorus.
I tested a newer MacbookPro retina, that was not better than mine. The difference was, it produced little dropouts every 10 seconds.
Hopefuly there will be a update for 3.1 soon.
And be serious: Before 3.1 you could play a show without dropouts, but was it fun? Mainstage urgently needs better latency capabilities, generally.

Different CPU Overload

I read the earlier post about CPU overload. I am not getting the overload error message, Logic just stops when the CPU bar is slammed into the red. I am not using any plug-ins or effects, I do have 48 channels of audio I am trying to mix. I have been using Logic for over a year and a half now and this is a new problem. Is there something else I can check to discover why suddenly I have this overload problem?

Different CPU Overload
this is OP question...
I try to answer directly to you:
Yes!!!
*There are different Logic overloads on different CPUs + audio device*
the overlaods message are strictly related with your CPU + Audio interface + RAM ammout and speed + Front Buss speed + Firewire, USB, PCI cards...
*also external drives spinndown can cause overloads message*
in a Pro Studio... I use workstation without external device...
all Firewire and USB device must be disconnected.. also bluetooth must be off...
(don't use bluetooth Mouse in Professional recording studio)
*Also File sharing and Wirless Airport must be turned to OFF!!!*
(OS X is a multitasking system... this is a great advantage for everyone... except for Professional Live processing power request... reduce to minimum the background running process is a must to avoid overloads and CPU spikes)
The audio cards that require CPU cycles are...
1) PCI or PCIe cards... Near to 0.1% CPU demand
2) Firewire... a little bit more (about from 3% to 8%.. depend about firewire Chip set and drivers) of CPU demand
3) USB = maximum CPU load power request... (more than 10% to 25% and more.. and this percentage rise up related with number of tracks)
(approximately percentage are stryctly related with CPU.. if G4 or G5 or Intels)
*So CPU overload are different and strictly related with your hardware!!!*
G

2011 Mac Mini, 10.8.3, SSD - System CPU at constant 10%, frequent 0.5 sec cursor freezes

Hi. I have a Mid-2011 Mac Mini with 8GB of RAM. I have an SSD installed in it as the primary drive, along with another internal 2TB drive and an external USB 2TB drive for media. This machine is mostly used as a media server and player. It's been running Mountain Lion since I bought it (refurb) last year. I upgraded to 10.8.3 as soon as that came out, and was running for a while without any problems. This evening, though, I started to notice some problems.
The main issue is that the CPU (well, one core) seems to be constantly under load. Under Activity Monitor I'm watching the system load (but not user load) hover between about 8% and 12%, all of the time. But looking at the program list, I don't see anything taking up more than about 2% of CPU, and that is taken up by Activity Monitor itself.
The annoying way that this manifests itself in the UI is that if I'm just randomly moving the cursor around in a circle, I can watch it periodically hang and freeze for about half of a second every 3-4 seconds or so. Meanwhile, everything else on the system also seems to freeze up for about half a second at the same time, which makes watching Netflix extremely irritating. (With Netflix the sound plays as normal, but the video freezes briefly every few seconds - I verified this in both Firefox and Chrome so I doubt it's a browser thing.)
I've already tried some troubleshooting steps myself. (None of this has worked yet.)
I saw a lot of messages in console about "mdworker deny mach-lookup com.apple.ls.boxd", which googling around for led me to this page; per the instructions there I booted into safe mode, waited a bit and rebooted, and now I don't see those messages any more. (I didn't mess with the sandbox.sb file, about which, really? Apple implemented this in Scheme or something?) Just to be on the safe side, though, I disabled Spotlight indexing with sudo mdutil -a -i off.
I opened Disk Util and ran a verify on all three disks, no errors. I found one or two permissions that needed repairing on the startup SSD and repaired them. The problem persisted. I also cleared out my caches with Maintenance while I was at it.
As a side note, even when I rebooted in safe mode, I was still seeing the same behavior (periodic half-second mouse freezes, system CPU averaging a constant 10% or so in Activity Monitor).
I also spent some time reading this other thread which looked like it had some very useful advice (unlike that poster, though, my Spotlight processes aren't crashing). So I went ahead and followed Linc Davis's first set of instructions in that thread. Here's what I've got for steps 1 and 2.
1. Activity monitor
Highest-CPU process is Activity Monitor at about 1-2% CPU
CPU: User 1%, system ~10%, idle ~90%
System memory: Page outs 0, swap used 0 bytes
Disk activity: Reads in/sec 0, Writes out/sec 0 (these infrequently spike up to about 40 or 50 max)
2. System log
I put up a gist for this here. It's my last 50 messages or so, probably some are coming from the most recent reboot. I can see the "IOHIDSystem cursor update overdue. Resending" messages which I presume are linked to my cursor freezes, but nothing else looks obviously suspicious to me. The stuff about "menucracker" is down to MenuMeters; I uninstalled it and rebooted at one point just to check, but it didn't seem to make a difference so I reinstalled it.
As far as kexts go, the only one I had that wasn't Apple was SoundFlower. I actually need that one, I use it to stream files from Plex, but I went ahead and uninstalled it anyways, and it didn't make a difference. My launchd lists start up sickbeard, sabnzbd, and plex, but I've manually quit all of those and the problem persists, so I highly douby any of them are to blame.
Any advice greatly appreciated. Is there a better way that I can see what exactly is causing the high system CPU load, like can I list processes by number of kernel calls or something? I did try top and ps but I didn't see anything obviously different from Activity Monitor in their output.

Nope, I don't have a "/Users/charon/Library/Mobile Documents" directory, let alone anything underneath it. Is that like an iCloud thing or something? I tend to avoid the Apple-supplied services when I can (I don't use iTunes either unless I can help it).
As an update, as of about two days later this problem seems to have solved itself. Possibly sleeping and waking did something to it (though that seems unlikely given how many times I rebooted), or else there was just some long-*** kernel process that finally worked itself out. But my system CPU is back down to normal and the cursor freezes are gone.
??? it is a mystery! ???

CPU Overload (-10010) with Logic 9.0.2 and SL 10.6.2 after clean install

Whether using the demo song (Numbers Game), or a new song even with just a couple of instruments (EXS) and a single audio track I get a CPU overload -10010 or -1009 message sometimes every few seconds, sometimes every 30 minutes.
I thought perhaps a conflict with drivers or other software, so I have tried a clean install of SL10.6, updated to 10.6.2, loaded Logic Pro, updated to 9.0.2, and added NO OTHER SOFTWARE AT ALL, and used internal audio, still same problem.
This seems to be a bug in Logic or SL. What can I do?
Message was edited by: ebjornard

This is no bug, your system is telling you that it cannot handle the full load of this song. Try Freezing tracks with heavy CPU-using plugins on them.
Also, check (and bookmark!) these docs:
http://support.apple.com/kb/TA24535?viewlocale=en_US
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3161
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT2375
and especially:
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2175192&tstart=0

Some web pages causing 100% CPU use of iexplore.exe since Flash update

I'm having a problem with certain Amazon.com pages hanging my
Internet Explorer 6 using Flash Player 10,0,12,36, causing 100% CPU
use for iexplore.exe and requiring me to End Task to quit. All the
pages effected have an interactive mouseover Size and Color chart
that intially says "Loading" but then says "Select Size and Color"
once loaded. One mouseovers the various color patches and size
options, each time giving item availability in that option. When
the pages hang the IE browser with 100% CPU use that chart never
gets to the "Select Size and Color" point, instead stuck at the
"Loading" status. This happens most times, but not every time.
Sometimes the pages load correctly, after a brief lag as it loads
the chart.
Amazon pages without this chart load fine.
The start of this problem coincides with updating Flash.
I can prevent the problem from happening almost every time if
I can quickly get my cursor into that chart area while the page
begins loading. If I allow the pages to load fully with no
interaction they will hang almost every time.
I have not noticed any problems on those same web pages using
Firefox using Flash Player 9,0,124,0
I also have not noticed any issues with other sites using
Internet Explorer either. (YouTube, QVC, CNN...etc, all OK.)
I had posted for assistance on the Experts Exchange site and
there was some debate on whether the chart was a Java or
Flash-based chart, so initially it was being approached as a
possible Java issue, so I removed all Java versions on the system
and installed various versions, but the same problem persists.
I've downloaded but not run the Flash Uninstaller, as I'm
reluctant to uninstall the Firefox Flash version without knowing
for sure I could install 9,0,124,0 again.
I've downloaded an archived fp9_archive.zip, which seems to
indicate the contained files flashplayer9r124_winax.exe (Internet
Explorer) and flashplayer9r124_win.exe (Netscape) would be versions
9,0,124,0 to install after running the uninstaller.
Can anyone check a few of the links below and see if the
"Select Size and Color" chart is Flash based? If so, would
executing the files listed above install 9,0,124,0 into my
respective browsers again?
http://www.amazon.com/FCS-Regular-7mm-Surf-Leash/dp/B00149XJ68
http://www.amazon.com/Womens-Classic-Short-UGG-Boots/dp/B00064NH8W/ref=pd_ecc_rvi_cart_3
http://www.amazon.com/Columbia-Sportswear-Womens-Benton-Springs/dp/B0006M6IQ2/ref=pd_ecc_r vi_cart_2
http://www.amazon.com/Ladies-Chenille-Zip-Cardigan-Sweater/dp/B001E0YJ0C/ref=pd_ecc_rvi_ca rt_4
XP IE 6 (error module : MSHTML.DLL)
Flash Player version 10,0,12,36
Firefox
Flash Player version 9,0,124,0
Thank you-
Vickie

I'm attempting to troubleshoot an issue with Amazon web pages
since I've updated my Flash player. I would appreciate if someone
could take a look at my initial post and advise if the issue seems
to be Flash related.
Thank you.
I'm having a problem with certain Amazon.com pages hanging my
Internet Explorer 6 using Flash Player 10,0,12,36, causing 100% CPU
use for iexplore.exe and requiring me to End Task to quit. All the
pages effected have an interactive mouseover Size and Color chart
that intially says "Loading" but then says "Select Size and Color"
once loaded. One mouseovers the various color patches and size
options, each time giving item availability in that option. When
the pages hang the IE browser with 100% CPU use that chart never
gets to the "Select Size and Color" point, instead stuck at the
"Loading" status. This happens most times, but not every time.
Sometimes the pages load correctly, after a brief lag as it loads
the chart.
Amazon pages without this chart load fine.
The start of this problem coincides with updating Flash.
I can prevent the problem from happening almost every time if
I can quickly get my cursor into that chart area while the page
begins loading. If I allow the pages to load fully with no
interaction they will hang almost every time.
I have not noticed any problems on those same web pages using
Firefox using Flash Player 9,0,124,0
I also have not noticed any issues with other sites using
Internet Explorer either. (YouTube, QVC, CNN...etc, all OK.)
I had posted for assistance on the Experts Exchange site and
there was some debate on whether the chart was a Java or
Flash-based chart, so initially it was being approached as a
possible Java issue, so I removed all Java versions on the system
and installed various versions, but the same problem persists.
I've downloaded but not run the Flash Uninstaller, as I'm
reluctant to uninstall the Firefox Flash version without knowing
for sure I could install 9,0,124,0 again.
I've downloaded an archived fp9_archive.zip, which seems to
indicate the contained files flashplayer9r124_winax.exe (Internet
Explorer) and flashplayer9r124_win.exe (Netscape) would be versions
9,0,124,0 to install after running the uninstaller.
Can anyone check a few of the links below and see if the
"Select Size and Color" chart is Flash based? If so, would
executing the files listed above install 9,0,124,0 into my
respective browsers again?
http://www.amazon.com/FCS-Regular-7mm-Surf-Leash/dp/B00149XJ68
http://www.amazon.com/Womens-Classic-Short-UGG-Boots/dp/B00064NH8W/ref=pd_ecc_rvi_cart_3
http://www.amazon.com/Columbia-Sportswear-Womens-Benton-Springs/dp/B0006M6IQ2/ref=pd_ecc_r vi_cart_2
http://www.amazon.com/Ladies-Chenille-Zip-Cardigan-Sweater/dp/B001E0YJ0C/ref=pd_ecc_rvi_ca rt_4
XP IE 6 (error module : MSHTML.DLL)
Flash Player version 10,0,12,36
Firefox
Flash Player version 9,0,124,0

SB Audigy 4 causes system to freeze

Hello,
As the title suggests, I've got a problem with my Audigy 4. From time to time it will freeze my computer completely, often creating a sound loop or some wierd screeching noises. It mostly happens when playing certain games, but also sometimes in Windows or when watching video/TV. However it is not possible to predict if and when it will happen, as there are no signs of crashing before the actual freeze and it can happen after 5 minutes as well as after several hours.
The same happened by the way with my previous (completely different) system, I just didn't realize that it was the soundcard that caused those crashes...
My chipset and graphics drivers are up to date, as well as Win XP and DirectX. Of course I am also using the newest SB driver (2.8.000).
I know there are already plenty of threads about that issue, but well... it's not quite easy to get an overview.
I don't know if this is just a driver issue, some kind of hardware defect or... whatever.
So... I'd appreciate any help.
This is my current system:
CPU: AMD Phenom II X4 955 Black Edition
Mainboard: Gigabyte GA-MA770T-UD3P (AMD 770 chipset)
RAM: 2*2GB Corsair DDR3 333 ?
PSU: Enermax LibertyECO 500W
GPU: Sapphire Toxic Radeon HD 4890
HD: Western Digital Caviar Blue 640GB
TV: Leadtek Winfast PVR2000

Thanks for the hint, I gave it a try.
But unfortunately it didn't help.

%ASA-2-321005: System CPU utilization reached 2840655%

Anyone ever seen a message like this?
We're running v8.4(2) on a 5520. We detected no other anomolies around that middle-of-the-night timeframe.

Exactly, that is expected with the bug
Read the description of the bug:
This bug causes this message to be generated erroneously with incorrect CPU usage, for instance:
%ASA-2-321005: System CPU utilization reached 4294967%
%ASA-2-321005: System CPU utilization reached 4294964%
Conditions:
NA
Workaround:
This is a cosmetic issue

Extremely high system CPU load on my new 2012 Macbook Pro

I just brought my brand new 2012 Macbook Pro (non-retina) home from the store and noticed that it was running INCREDIBLY slow. I opened up the activity monitor and found that the system's CPU load is consistently around 70%-90%. I haven't installed any software outside of google chrome, although the issue was happening even before I installed google chrome.
Here are screenshots of my macbook's specs
Here's a screenshot of the processes sorted by %CPU
Here's a screenshot of the processes sorted by CPU Time
Any idea what would cause such a high system CPU load? Again I haven't installed any software outside of google chrome, and I don't have anything hooked up to my Macbook. This issue happens when my Macbook is both plugged and unplugged and I haven't noticed any overheating or extensive fan use.

harkiamsuperman,
your first image shows Chrome using over half of the CPU time. Note that Chrome on Mavericks is more CPU-intensive than other browsers, since Google does not provide a 64-bit version of the app for OS X.
Since you’ve just brought your MacBook Pro home, perhaps Spotlight is doing its initial indexing of your internal disk; that could be one possible explanation. If that is the cause, then your CPU usage should settle down after it finishes.
If you’d like to try something simple and immediate, you could reset your MacBook Pro’s System Management Controller, to see if that makes a difference.

VI causes high CPU load after several days of running

Hello,
I have a strange problem. I have craeted a test bench control VI and it runs on five PCs, controling five test benches. All PCs have almost the same hardware, same motherboard, same CPU, etc.
Normaly the CPU load is around 50% when I run the VI, but at one PC the CPU load climbs up to 85% after several days (maybe one week) of continuous running and the PC is almost tied up - the VI execution becomes very slow (10 times slower) and the mouse only moves very slowly.
First I thought that the PC has a problem but the problem dissapears as soon as I stop and restart the VI!
I don't even have to terminate LabVIEW - only my VI and then everything is okay again.
The problem does not seem to occur at the other four PCs, but I can not tell for sure.
The task manager says only LabVIEW causes the CPU load - swap file utilisation is little.
Is there a way to analyze what causes the high CPU load?
I Use LabVIEW 7.1 professional
Operating System: Win XP (SP 2 or 3 I don't remember)
P.S. I have no loops without wait-functions.
Greetings Johannes
Using LabVIEW 7.1 and 2009 recently
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Do all PCs have the same amount of RAM?
What is the memory use over time as seen by the windows taks manager. Does it increase gradually?
An increase in resource usage if often cause by sloppy programming.
Do you grow arrays forever or constantly resize arrays in memory? (built array, insert into array, delete from array)
Do you often create new references and never close them?
What does the program actually do? In my opinion, a constant 50% CPU load seems too high for my taste. It means it would not even be able to keep up on slightly older hardware.
LabVIEW Champion . Do more with less code and in less time .

BT stack file TosBTMng.Exe causes 100% CPU Load

I'm also facing the problem that the Toshiba Bluetooth Manager (TosBtMng.exe) very often starts looping and causes a CPU load of 100%.
This happened with older versions of the Toshiba Bluetooth Stack and current version (5.1.0.12).
The affected system is a Tecra S1, internal BT-Modul and Windows XP SP2.
Installation of the BT-Stack went well and the notebook will boot succesfull while BT is enabled. I also checked for hidden COM-Ports and other hints found in this forum, no success.
The lockup seems to happen at different times. Sometimes just after are reboot, clicking on the BT Tray symbol with the right mouse button. Then the context menu is shown just as white area, no entries. It may also trying to connect to an already paired device. If I kill the process with the task manager I can restart and it continues to work for some time.
As found in another thread here I have enabled API logging of the Bluetooth Manager and found the following while connecting with the Nokia PC Suite to my mobile Phone:
00042519 21:55:05 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BtCreateCOMM() -> BtCreateCOMM2()
00042520 21:55:05 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BtCreateCOMM2()
00042521 21:55:05 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] BtCreateCOMM2 : InitCOMPort=COM6, CreateCOMPort=COM23
00042522 21:55:05 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] BlockingSDPCall : Send COPYDATASTRUCT / FuncNumber=00008000(32768), Size=00000036(54)
00042523 21:55:05 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Receive WM_COPYDATA / fCloseAPI(BOOL)=0
00042524 21:55:05 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] SetReturnBackData : Received COPYDATASTRUCT / FuncNumber=00008000(32768), Size=00000028(40)
00042525 21:55:05 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BlockingSDPCall() is returned.
00042526 21:56:14 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BtGetLocalInfo()
00042527 21:56:14 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] BtGetLocalInfo2 : Input Paramers / pLocalBtDeviceInfo=00D9FE8C, plStatus=00D9FE84
00042528 21:56:14 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] BlockingSDPCall : Send COPYDATASTRUCT / FuncNumber=00001000(4096), Size=00000030(48)
00042529 21:56:14 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Receive WM_COPYDATA / fCloseAPI(BOOL)=0
00042530 21:56:14 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] SetReturnBackData : Received COPYDATASTRUCT / FuncNumber=00001000(4096), Size=0000003F(63)
00042531 21:56:14 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BlockingSDPCall() is returned.
00042532 21:56:17 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BtGetRemoteDeviceList2()
A new COM port is successfully created (COM23), and a few seconds later the CPU Load of TosBtMng goes up to 100%, but no API calls are performed. And if you wait long enough the phone gets connected and data can be transferred. However, very slowly.
Probably due to the high CPU load a next COM (COM24) port will be created sometime later and this process is then repeated again:
00042740 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Receive WM_COPYDATA / fCloseAPI(BOOL)=0
00042741 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] SetReturnBackData : Received COPYDATASTRUCT / FuncNumber=00008007(32775), Size=00000041(65)
00042742 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BlockingSDPCall() is returned.
00042743 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BtCreateCOMM() -> BtCreateCOMM2()
00042744 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BtCreateCOMM2()
00042745 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] BtCreateCOMM2 : InitCOMPort=COM6, CreateCOMPort=COM24
00042746 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] BlockingSDPCall : Send COPYDATASTRUCT / FuncNumber=00008000(32768), Size=00000036(54)
00042747 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Receive WM_COPYDATA / fCloseAPI(BOOL)=0
00042748 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] SetReturnBackData : Received COPYDATASTRUCT / FuncNumber=00008000(32768), Size=00000028(40)
00042749 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BlockingSDPCall() is returned.
00042750 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BtGetCOMMInfoList2()
00042751 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BtCreateCOMM() -> BtCreateCOMM2()
00042752 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BtCreateCOMM2()
00042753 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BtCreateCOMM() -> BtCreateCOMM2()
00042754 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BtCreateCOMM2()
00042755 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BtCreateCOMM() -> BtCreateCOMM2()
00042756 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BtCreateCOMM2()
00042757 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BtCreateCOMM() -> BtCreateCOMM2()
00042758 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BtCreateCOMM2()
00042759 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BtCreateCOMM() -> BtCreateCOMM2()
00042760 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BtCreateCOMM2()
00042761 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BtGetLocalInfo()
00042762 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BtGetLocalInfo()
Maybe this helps to locate the origin of the CPU load problem of the Bluetooth Manager.
Thanks
Gerhard

I was having the same problem, and it turned out to be the Data execution prevention settings. I had turned on (System->Advanced->Data execution protection) the execution prevention for all programs, causing TosBTMng.exe to max out one processor core all the time. The solution was to add TosBtMng.exe to the list of exceptions and restart. I'd looked high and low for a solution - hope this helps someone else!

Logic 8 CPU overload for absolutely no reason

I'm too familiar with this, which is what I'm getting for just one project that I recently started:
"Logic Pro: Disk is too slow or System Overload."
There's nothing wrong with my computer. It's a 2 x 2.8 Quad-Core Intel Xeon with 8 GB of memory. And here's a picture of what's on this project. Essentially NOTHING.
I'm panning back and forth between audio regions (consisting of clips from different songs) on two different tracks fading in and out. Nothing fancy. Yet the first time (only the first time) the playhead encounters the next region, the CPU overload window pops up. I mean....really? Why? I have no idea why this is. I am running on Logic 8.0.2 but I see no reason to "upgrade" as this version is not CPU overloading on any other project.

There are a few threads on this topic already, including one a couple of days ago. They should get you started with some ideas about how to approach the problem.
Marcus

I have found an issue with MS13-098 which causes systems to be renamed to MINWINPC

I have found an issue with MS13-098 which causes systems to be renamed to MINWINPC. The issue has been reported in Japanese by Microsoft. The translation is:
Phenomenon
In Windows Server 2008 or Windows Vista, you might not be able to log an error appears to apply the new update the following programs, if you try to log on after the restart. • MS12-024 (KB2653956)
• MS13-098 (KB2893294)
Error message displayed is as follows.
Incorrect password or user name
Back to the top | feedback
Collapse image Cause
This behavior occurs when you apply the update KB2653956 in the state of some data is damaged following registry key, or does not exist.
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE \ SCHEMA \ wcm :/ / Microsoft-Windows-CoreOS? ...
Any string will contain the part of the ... Note:. Also, make sure to load the SystemRoot% \ system32 \ SMI \ Store \ Machine \ SCHEMA.DAT file% if the HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE \ SCHEMA does not exist.
When you apply the update of KB2653956 in the state where the registry key is not present, the value of the following registry is changed to MINWINPC, logon will not be able to.
• HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE \ SYSTEM \ CurrentControlSet \ Control \ ComputerName \ ActiveComputerName
• HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE \ SYSTEM \ CurrentControlSet \ Control \ ComputerName \ ComputerName
Back to the top | feedback
Collapse image Solution
If this occurs, change to the correct computer name the value of the ComputerName registry and ActiveComputerName start in safe mode, has been mentioned above, and then restart.
Back to the top | feedback
Collapse image Workaround
To prevent this phenomenon occurs, you download and run the System Update Readiness Tool from the following KB.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/947821
By performing the system update Preparation tool registry that is described in Section Symptoms are repaired.
If the repair is made, starting with log Recreated missing key as the following WinDir% \ Logs \ CBS \ CheckSUR.log file% is recorded.
Recreated missing key:? Wcm :/ / Microsoft-Windows-CoreOS ... \ metadata \ elements \ ComputerName
In addition, regardless of the presence or absence of entry damaged Microsoft-Windows-CoreOS, you can set the value of the ComputerName key in this tool. For this reason, the following log is recorded in the CheckSUR.log.
Recreated value: @ _type.
Recreated value: @ dataOnly.
Recreated value: @ default.
Recreated value: @ description.
Recreated value: @ displayName.
Recreated value: @ handler.
Recreated value: @ legacyName.
Recreated value: @ legacyType.
Recreated value: @ migrate.
Recreated value: @ scope.
Recreated value: @ xsd: type.
Back to the top | feedback
Note: This is a "FAST PUBLISH" article created directly from within the Microsoft support organization. It contains information in response to emerging issues are listed. As a result of the speed of information provided may be
typographical errors are included in the article, you might be revised at any time without prior notice. For other considerations, and use conditions
Please refer to.
Back to the top | feedback
Collapse image Property
December 11, 2013 - Revision: - Last Review: 2901584: 4.0 Document Number
This document that was written about products for.
• Windows Vista Business
• Windows Vista Business 64-bit edition
• Windows Vista Enterprise
• Windows Vista Enterprise 64-bit edition
• Windows Vista Home Basic
• Windows Vista Home Basic 64-bit edition
• Windows Vista Home Premium
• Windows Vista Home Premium 64-bit edition
• Windows Vista Starter
• Windows Vista Ultimate
• Windows Vista Ultimate 64-bit edition
• Windows Server 2008 Datacenter
• Windows Server 2008 Datacenter without Hyper-V
• Windows Server 2008 Enterprise
• Windows Server 2008 Enterprise without Hyper-V
• Windows Server 2008 for Itanium-Based Systems
• Windows Server 2008 Foundation
• Windows Server 2008 Standard
• Windows Server 2008 Standard without Hyper-V
• Windows Web Server 2008
• Windows HPC Server 2008
• Windows Essential Business Server 2008
We are having the issue on hundreds of systems and I am rolling out the readiness tool mentioned above to prevent other systems from being affected. In the mean time I have stopped deploying MS13-098 and am hoping Microsoft will go ahead and let all
of their customers know about the problem instead of just one country. Hopefully the original bulletin will be updated with this known issue.

PPoj,
Apple has offered replacement or pro-rated refunds in the US as a settlement of a class action lawsuit, not because of pride in their design-centric approach to their products. If you seek a similar replacement/refund program in India, then the odds are pretty good that you’d need a similar legal approach with which to convince Apple to offer a similar program there. If you’re unwilling to wait for such an event, then you can purchase a replacement power cable now, and hope for a pro-rated refund at some point in the future.

Holding down the option key when booting my iMac lo longer shows me my bootable external drives, the system just boots up to the main system. Also, holding down command, option,P,R no longer zaps the p-ram. the system just boots up.

Holding down the option key when booting my iMac lo longer shows me my bootable external drives, the system just boots up to the main system. Also, holding down command, option,P,R no longer zaps the p-ram. the system just boots up normally. Why do these key fonctions no longer work?

It could be your timing if on a bluetooth keyboard. I find it best to hit the keys as soon as i hear the chime, release and hit them again but this time holding them before the chime ends....like a fake pump in football.
But....you can always open up system preferences, startup disk, and select your bootable clone for booting. If it doesn't show up there, the Mac doesn't think it's bootable.

External MTC causing system & CPU overloads

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for