Extra sort field in LOV with Union

I'm building an LOV that is based on a single table, but the list needs to be broken up into two groups to show preferred vs. non-preferred values. I would like to display the preferred values in the table first (sorted) and then the non preferred values (sorted) second. I am able to do this in SQL with a UNION and by creating an extra "sort" column for the ORDER BY clause. The problem is, Dynamic LOV only allows a query to return exactly two columns, hence I can't include my sort column. Below is the query that works in SQL Builder, but no LOV. Any suggestions on how I can do this in an LOV without including the 3rd column?
/* Preferred companies */
select     CC_COMPANIES.NAME||'*' as display_value,
     CC_COMPANIES.ID as return_value,
'A'||CC_COMPANIES.NAME as sort_value
from     CC_WATCHLIST CC_WATCHLIST,
     CC_COMPANIES CC_COMPANIES
where CC_WATCHLIST.ITEM_ID=CC_COMPANIES.ID
and CC_WATCHLIST.MEMBER_ID=:CC_MEMBER_ID
and      CC_WATCHLIST.CATEGORY_ID = 6
UNION
/* the rest of the companies */
select     CC_COMPANIES.NAME as display_value,
     CC_COMPANIES.ID as return_value,
'Z'||CC_COMPANIES.NAME as sort_value
from     CC_WATCHLIST CC_WATCHLIST,
     CC_COMPANIES CC_COMPANIES
where CC_COMPANIES.ID not in (select CC_WATCHLIST.ITEM_ID from CC_WATCHLIST where CC_WATCHLIST.MEMBER_ID=:CC_MEMBER_ID
and      CC_WATCHLIST.CATEGORY_ID = 6
and CC_WATCHLIST.ITEM_ID=CC_COMPANIES.ID)
ORDER BY sort_value

Jeff,
Try this:
select x.display_value, x.return_value from (
/* Preferred companies */
select CC_COMPANIES.NAME||'*' as display_value,
CC_COMPANIES.ID as return_value,
'A'||CC_COMPANIES.NAME as sort_value
from CC_WATCHLIST CC_WATCHLIST,
CC_COMPANIES CC_COMPANIES
where CC_WATCHLIST.ITEM_ID=CC_COMPANIES.ID
and CC_WATCHLIST.MEMBER_ID=:CC_MEMBER_ID
and CC_WATCHLIST.CATEGORY_ID = 6
UNION
/* the rest of the companies */
select CC_COMPANIES.NAME as display_value,
CC_COMPANIES.ID as return_value,
'Z'||CC_COMPANIES.NAME as sort_value
from CC_WATCHLIST CC_WATCHLIST,
CC_COMPANIES CC_COMPANIES
where CC_COMPANIES.ID not in (select CC_WATCHLIST.ITEM_ID from CC_WATCHLIST where CC_WATCHLIST.MEMBER_ID=:CC_MEMBER_ID
and CC_WATCHLIST.CATEGORY_ID = 6
and CC_WATCHLIST.ITEM_ID=CC_COMPANIES.ID)
ORDER BY sort_value) xJoel

Similar Messages

  • Cic winclient :  Extra search field is populating with BP number

    Hi guys
    I enhanced the IC WINCLIENT search criteria with Extra field ( BP External number) in the BP extended search area i.e application area by adding the HTML code and I Modified all the relevant function modules,  when I am searching with BP External number it was working fine, <b>except in the result screen Extended field ( BP External number) is filling with BP Number not with the  BP External number .</b>
    is it required to make any changes in the html code
    I did the below HTML code
    <TR><TH align=left width=28%>BP External Number</TH>
    <TD width=72%><INPUT name=BP1_BPEXT size=20 maxLength=20 type=TEXT/PLAIN>
            </TD></TR>
    Pls help me what I am missing
    Thanks in advance
    Warm regards
    Rajasekhar
    <b></b>

    Hello,
    please see note 950975 and check IE versions and also check that the latest GUI patch is available on the users PCs.
    Regards, Gerhard

  • Issue with date-related sorting fields in iTunes 8

    This really is just a small glitch, but it's got me wondering. For all of my files in iTunes - songs, podcasts, etc., all of the sorting fields that deal with dates (Date added, last played, etc.) give the correct day and year, but give the month as January. For example, any song that I add today would return a date of 1/14/08 instead of 12/14/08. The dates included in the ID3 tags for these files are also messed up in the same way.
    Obviously, this doesn't affect my day-to-day use of iTunes; just thought it was an odd little bug.

    Perhaps it would pay to check your date/regional settings (sorry I rarely play with Macs so I'm not certain of the settings layout) to make sure the short date format makes sense, i.e. reads MM/DD/YYYY or something similar.
    tt2

  • Using LOV with Validation on the Numeric Fields results in Error

    Dear JHeadstart Team,
    During my work with lov I encountered another problem. I defined a lov and attached the lov to a numeric field and check the LOV for validation. Now when I use LOV using the LOV button it works fine but when I enter some numbers and then press tab the LOV was not shown correctly and resulted in the following errors and the worst thing is that you can not navigate to any other pages and all try to navigate to other pages results in errors too. When we put the same LOV on a string field (which is not desirable for us) it worked fine.
    It seems to me like a bug. Am I right? Is ther any solution or workaround for this problem?
    Thanks in advance,
    Navid
    16:31:29 DEBUG (LovItemBean) -Cleared value of item HrTrainingCourseSchedulesTitle
    16:31:29 DEBUG (LovItemBean) -Cleared value binding #{bindings.HrTrainingCourseSchedulesTitle.inputValue} of item HrTrainingCourseSchedulesTitle
    16:31:29 ERROR (ApplyRequestValuesPhase) -java.lang.ClassCastException: java.lang.Long
    javax.faces.el.EvaluationException: java.lang.ClassCastException: java.lang.Long
         at com.sun.faces.el.MethodBindingImpl.invoke(MethodBindingImpl.java:130)
         at oracle.adf.view.faces.component.UIXComponentBase.__broadcast(UIXComponentBase.java:1079)
         at oracle.adf.view.faces.component.UIXEditableValue.broadcast(UIXEditableValue.java:247)
         at oracle.adf.view.faces.component.UIXSelectInput.broadcast(UIXSelectInput.java:215)
         at javax.faces.component.UIViewRoot.broadcastEvents(UIViewRoot.java:249)
         at javax.faces.component.UIViewRoot.processDecodes(UIViewRoot.java:307)
         at com.sun.faces.lifecycle.ApplyRequestValuesPhase.execute(ApplyRequestValuesPhase.java:79)
         at com.sun.faces.lifecycle.LifecycleImpl.phase(LifecycleImpl.java:200)
         at com.sun.faces.lifecycle.LifecycleImpl.execute(LifecycleImpl.java:90)
         at javax.faces.webapp.FacesServlet.service(FacesServlet.java:197)
         at com.evermind.server.http.ResourceFilterChain.doFilter(ResourceFilterChain.java:64)
         at com.pooya.controller.jsf.PooyaAuthenticationFilter.doFilter(PooyaAuthenticationFilter.java:256)
         at com.evermind.server.http.EvermindFilterChain.doFilter(EvermindFilterChain.java:15)
         at oracle.adf.model.servlet.ADFBindingFilter.doFilter(ADFBindingFilter.java:332)
         at com.evermind.server.http.EvermindFilterChain.doFilter(EvermindFilterChain.java:17)
         at oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.webapp.AdfFacesFilterImpl._invokeDoFilter(AdfFacesFilterImpl.java:367)
         at oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.webapp.AdfFacesFilterImpl._doFilterImpl(AdfFacesFilterImpl.java:336)
         at oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.webapp.AdfFacesFilterImpl.doFilter(AdfFacesFilterImpl.java:196)
         at oracle.adf.view.faces.webapp.AdfFacesFilter.doFilter(AdfFacesFilter.java:87)
         at com.evermind.server.http.ServletRequestDispatcher.invoke(ServletRequestDispatcher.java:627)
         at com.evermind.server.http.ServletRequestDispatcher.forwardInternal(ServletRequestDispatcher.java:376)
         at com.evermind.server.http.HttpRequestHandler.doProcessRequest(HttpRequestHandler.java:870)
         at com.evermind.server.http.HttpRequestHandler.processRequest(HttpRequestHandler.java:451)
         at com.evermind.server.http.HttpRequestHandler.serveOneRequest(HttpRequestHandler.java:218)
         at com.evermind.server.http.HttpRequestHandler.run(HttpRequestHandler.java:119)
         at com.evermind.server.http.HttpRequestHandler.run(HttpRequestHandler.java:112)
         at oracle.oc4j.network.ServerSocketReadHandler$SafeRunnable.run(ServerSocketReadHandler.java:260)
         at oracle.oc4j.network.ServerSocketAcceptHandler.procClientSocket(ServerSocketAcceptHandler.java:230)
         at oracle.oc4j.network.ServerSocketAcceptHandler.access$800(ServerSocketAcceptHandler.java:33)
         at oracle.oc4j.network.ServerSocketAcceptHandler$AcceptHandlerHorse.run(ServerSocketAcceptHandler.java:831)
         at com.evermind.util.ReleasableResourcePooledExecutor$MyWorker.run(ReleasableResourcePooledExecutor.java:303)
         at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)
    Caused by: java.lang.ClassCastException: java.lang.Long
         at oracle.jheadstart.controller.jsf.bean.LovItemBean.validateWithLov(LovItemBean.java:101)
         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
         at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
         at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
         at com.sun.faces.el.MethodBindingImpl.invoke(MethodBindingImpl.java:126)
         ... 31 more

    Hi Navid,
    We ran into the same bug and have the next workaround for it:
    We extended the JHeadstart class 'LovItemBean' and we have overridden the method 'validateWithLov(...)' with:
      public void validateWithLov(ValueChangeEvent valueChangeEvent)
        Object newValue = valueChangeEvent.getNewValue();
        if(newValue != null && !(newValue instanceof String))
          newValue = newValue.toString();
          ValueChangeEvent newEvent = new ValueChangeEvent(valueChangeEvent.getComponent(), valueChangeEvent.getOldValue(), newValue);
          newEvent.setPhaseId(valueChangeEvent.getPhaseId());
          super.validateWithLov(newEvent);
        else
          super.validateWithLov(valueChangeEvent);
      }Next step is to use a custom template in your JHeaedstart Application Structure file for 'LOV_ITEM_BEAN'. In this custom template you should use your own class as 'managed-bean-class' instead of the default JHeadstart one.
    Now you can safely generate LOV with validation of number fields.
    Maybe something the JHeadstart can pcik up in the next release of JHeadstart :-)
    Hope this helps.
    Pascal

  • Is there a way to sort a PDF file with multiple pages by a specific field within the PDF? All pages have the same invoice format and i would like to sort by a field within and then print the documents. (Vendor, PO

    Is there a way to sort a PDF file with multiple pages by a specific field within the PDF? All pages have the same invoice format and i would like to sort by a field within and then print the documents. (Vendor, PO#, Date, ect.)

    When you say field, do you mean specifically a form field, such as a text field? Or is the information regular text on the page?

  • LOV creation with UNION syntaxe

    Hello,
    I need a LOV like e.g.
    Select code, label from my_table
    UNION
    Select 10,'Label' from DUAL
    I don't know how to create this kind of LOV with Designer9i
    Thanks

    Hello,
    you should define your first table usage (my_table in your example) and then create a SQL Query Set for the second one (DUAL in your example).
    See Designer online help topic "SQL query sets" for more information.
    Regards,
    Didier.

  • Very Urgent!!  Static LOV with Sort by Option with column names

    Hi All,
    Can we have am Static LOV with an order by option according to the column names in an Report..
    If so can you share with me, waiting for your reply and thanks in Advance..
    Select
    name,
    creator,
    date_created,
    NVL(Comp_type,Del_TYPE) FORMAT,
    from Table_name
    So i want to order by the following columns wrt Static Lov both Assending and Descending Order by
    like Name(Asc), Name(Desc),Creator(Asc),Creator(Desc) and so on for other columns
    Thanks and Regards,
    Suri

    where u are callling perform field_cat in ur program ?
    flow will be like this
    perform fcat.
    perform alv_display.
    form fcat.
    add code here for fcat.
    endform.
    form alv_display.
    call alv here
    endform.
    Regards
    Peram

  • ALV print problems for reports with two sort fields and subtotal at each

    When a report has two sort fields and subtotal at each of them, the print function is not working correctly. Please see the report below.
    The second "" (single star) record (the 10 RL record) and the '*' (double star) record (the 12 RL record)  are not printing.
    This is happening for any standard SAP reports. Any resolution? Any OSS Notes?
         Material/Stock Code          Grade       Units Count     Unit Type     Set Position     LFT
         520085V000          7818     1     RL     A     19,682 LF
         520085V000          7818     1     RL     A     19,682 LF
    *     520085V000               2     RL          
         599098V000               1     RL          
         599098V000               1     RL          
         599098V000               1     RL          
         599098V000               1     RL          
         599098V000               1     RL          
         599098V000               1     RL          
         599098V000               1     RL          
         599098V000               1     RL          
         599098V000               1     RL          
         599098V000          7717     1     RL     A     36,167 LF
    *     599098V000               10     RL          
    **                    12     RL          
    ***                    12               
    Thanks
    Anand
    Edited by: Anand Velayudhan on Feb 9, 2009 11:50 PM

    Hi,
    Check these OSS Notes..
    Note 975777 - ALV total: Subtotals disappear from printout
    Note 1039655 - ALV total: Subtotals disappear from printout II
    Thanks
    Naren

  • Report which concatenates 13 views with union all running slowly

    Oracle 8.1.7 windows 2000 server
    I am trying to improve the performance of a report which is comprised of 13 views.
    When I run each of the views individually, the total run time for the views is less than 5 minutes. When I run the report, it takes 28 minutes.
    Can anyone suggest why the extra time is being taken?
    To reiterate:
    select a,b from c; (executes in 10 seconds)
    select d, e from f (executes in 3 seconds)
    select x, y from z (executes in 1 minute)
    total runs time = 5 minutes
    However,
    select a,b from c
    union all
    select d, e from f
    union all
    select x, y from z (executes in 28 minutes)
    The execution plans do not change between the report and the indiividual views. Views are being concatenated with union all so no sorting is taking place
    Many thanks,
    Jason Parker.
    Edited by: jclparker on Feb 18, 2009 4:26 AM
    Edited by: jclparker on Feb 18, 2009 4:30 AM

    Could you post the execution plan? Please use formatting tags to save the white space while posting the plan.

  • Sort field in equipment main screen

    We have an equipment having some validity dates(Valid from: 20.11.2009 & valid to: 31.12.9999) . Whenever we enter sort field in the Location tab the validity start date changes to todays date (Valid from:10.06.2009). How we can avoid this changes of dates. What is relation of sort field with valid from date ?

    Hi,
    It appears you have the sort field marked as relevant for equipment usage period. This will cause a new usage period with valid from date to be set each time the value of this field is changed.
    You can check customizing as follows:
      Plant Maintenance and Customer Service
      Master Data in Plant Maintenance and Customer Service
      Technical Objects
       Equipment
       Equipment Usage Period
       Define History-Related Fields
    The field to look for is EQFNR.
    -Paul

  • Sort field in maintenance order

    Hello;
    I want to make sort field in maintenance order as a mandatory field. But if I make it as a mandatory field, system still allows me to save the order as long as I have not clicked 'Location' tab. So there is no positive control over this field. May I know, how do I achieve this? I have even tried to put order type as the influencing field but it does not help.
    Points assured.
    Regards
    Hemant

    Hello Hemant,
    access to the SAP service marketplace via www.service.sap.com to create an OSS message. Choose link "product errors". Therefore you need an OSS user and you have to be authorized to create OSS messages.
    To create an user-exit, you have to go to transaction CMOD. There you have to create a project and assign the enhancement you want to use (I'm not really sure, but I think IWO10009 is the correct one in your case - you can search the user-exits via transaction SMOD - search for IWO*).
    After this you have to implement your coding and then you have to activate the project.
    The implementation of the user-exit should be done by an ABAP developer.
    By the way - I've had a look at the OSS. There's note 768576.
    Reason and Prerequisites
    The problem is caused by a missing function.
    Influences set via field selection will only become effective if a screen with the corresponding fields is processed. You must also refer to the documentation defined in the corresponding Customizing area. For the location & account assignment data, no additional check is (such as with the general order header data) is realised during the saving.
    Prerequisite
    Via field selection you declared fields of the location & account assignment data as mandatory field, and no screen that contains these fields was passed.
    Solution
    By means of the example code, you must implement a corresponding mandatory field check via customer enhancement IWO10009 at the time of the order backup.
    1. Create subroutine Z_IWO10009_GET_DATA_FOR_FAW in program SAPMILA0. It would be best if you create an own include ZMILA0F1 for this so that you will not have any unnecessary expenditure for future Support Packages (via Transaction SE80).
    FORM Z_IWO10009_GET_DATA_FOR_FAW.
      CALL FUNCTION 'CO_IH_GET_HEADER'
           IMPORTING
                     CAUFVD_IMP = CAUFVD.
      CALL FUNCTION 'CO_IH_GET_ILOA'
           EXPORTING
                     CAUFVD_IMP = CAUFVD
           IMPORTING
                    ILOA_WA    = ILOA.
    ENDFORM.                    "Z_IWO10009_GET_DATA_FOR_FAW
    2. Create the following source code in customer enhancement IWO10009:
    STATICS: XTFAWF LIKE TFAWF OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE.
    tables:  tfawf.
    DATA: wa_screen    LIKE screen.
    FIELD-SYMBOLS:  'A'.
      perform Z_IWO10009_GET_DATA_FOR_FAW(SAPMILA0).
      if xtfawf[] is initial.
        SELECT * FROM TFAWF INTO TABLE XTFAWF
                 WHERE PROG = 'SAPMILA0'.
      endif.
      LOOP AT XTFAWF WHERE CUST_M = 'X'.
        CALL FUNCTION 'FIELD_SELECTION_INFLUENCE'
             EXPORTING
                  dynprogruppe = '7   '
                  mode        = 'C'
                  modulpool    = 'SAPMILA0'
                  fieldname    =  XTFAWF-MFELD
             IMPORTING
                  input        = wa_screen-input
                  output      = wa_screen-output
                  active      = wa_screen-active
                  required    = wa_screen-required
                  intensified  = wa_screen-intensified
                  invisible    = wa_screen-invisible
             EXCEPTIONS
                  OTHERS      = 1.
        if wa_screen-required = 1.
          clear lv_mfeld.
          lv_mfeld = 'CAUFVD_IMP-'.
          case XTFAWF-MFELD.
            when 'ILOA-AUFNR'.
              lv_mfeld+11 = 'IAUFNR'.
            when 'ILOA-KOKRS'.
              lv_mfeld+11 = 'IKOKRS'.
            when 'ILOA-BUKRS'.
              lv_mfeld+11 = 'IBUKRS'.
            when 'ILOA-GSBER'.
              lv_mfeld+11 = 'IGSBER'.
            when 'RILA0-ARBPL'.
              lv_mfeld11 = xtfawf-mfeld6.
            when others.
              lv_mfeld11 = xtfawf-mfeld5.
          endcase.
          ASSIGN (lv_mfeld) TO  IS INITIAL.
            Message E461(IW)
            with 'Mussfelder der Standort&Kontierungsdaten füllen'.
            EXIT.
          ENDIF.
        endif.
      endloop.
    endif.
    3. Activate the changes
    Correspondingly you can implement this solution also for the order release, for example, via customer enhancement IWO10002.
    Bear in mind that this is a source code proposal. It might be useful or necessary to adjust this source code to special applications.
    Best regards
    Stephan
    Edited by: Stephan Theis on Jan 5, 2008 11:20 AM

  • CreateInsert and LOV with multiple return values

    HI. I am on Build JDEVADF_11.1.2.3.0_GENERIC_120914.0223.6276.1
    I have a View Object which is based on Entity Object.
    View Object has customer_name and customer_id attributes.
    customer_name attribute has LOV (input field with LOV) based on some other View Object (which of caurse holds customer name and customer id data)
    I defined that when LOV return the chosen values it will populate customer_name with "Customer Name" value and customer_id with "Customer Id" value
    All atributes are updatable
    I droped my View Object on the page and also "CreateInsert" buton. When I click on "CreateInsert" button, I can see new row added as expected, customer_name field has LOV. I can choose from LOV and can see customers and customer_id data. But when I click OK in the LOV pop-up only customer_name attribute is populated!
    I do see that customer_id is returned from LOV (I implemented ReturnPopupEvent listener), but still the customer id remains empty.
    I though maybe I need to add LOV as auto submit = true and set LOV to be a partial trigger for customer_id. But still  - it didn't help
    However, if I run Application Module tester, I do get what I want. I can create new row and when I change customer name , both customer name and customer id fields are populated
    Please advice

    Hi Michael,
    On Lov VO, make sure you have at least one or combination of attributes as Key attribute. and re test.
    Thanks,
    Jeet

  • Report with Union

    Hello Gurus
    I have a report with UNION of 3 criteria and the result i am getting is one of the columns is a union of 3 columns like Age Group,Gender and Race and here the problem is i need to show them in order Race first, Age Group, Gender now it is showing in sorting order even though i cleared sort on all the columns 65+,75+,85+, Asain, Black,Female,Hispanic,Male instead i want the column to show me Asian, Black,Hispanic, 65+,75+,85+,Female, male also in that table i want to make the table line thicker after race category and Age Group
    Thanks
    RC

    user1146711 wrote:
    Hello Gurus
    I have a report with UNION of 3 criteria and the result i am getting is one of the columns is a union of 3 columns like Age Group,Gender and Race and here the problem is i need to show them in order Race first, Age Group, Gender now it is showing in sorting order even though i cleared sort on all the columns 65+,75+,85+, Asain, Black,Female,Hispanic,Male instead i want the column to show me Asian, Black,Hispanic, 65+,75+,85+,Female, male also in that table i want to make the table line thicker after race category and Age Group
    Thanks
    RCTry this:
    1) In each of your three separate queries, add another column.
    2) Create BINS according to how you want the final report be sorted: Asian = '1', Black = '2', etc...
    3) Sort on this column in the combined query.
    Since each query will have the proper number assigned to the group, the report will sort as you wish...

  • LOV with subselect shows return_value instead of display_value

    Hi,
    I have the following dynamic SQL based LOV with a union in it that does not display correctly in the application.
    SELECT role_name d, role_seq r
    FROM apex_app_roles ar
    WHERE security_level = 1
    AND :F2500_APP_USER in
    (SELECT au.user_id FROM
    apex_app_user au,
    apex_app_user_roles auar
    WHERE ar.role_seq = auar.role_seq
    AND auar.user_seq = au.user_seq)
    UNION
    SELECT role_name d, role_seq r
    FROM APEX_APP_ROLES ar
    WHERE security_level = 0
    ORDER BY 1
    The problem I have is the first part of the SQL is displaying the return_value instead of the display_value. If I comment out the following the proper value is displayed in the application.
    AND :F2500_APP_USER in
    (SELECT au.user_id FROM
    apex_app_user au,
    apex_app_user_roles auar
    WHERE ar.role_seq = auar.role_seq
    AND auar.user_seq = au.user_seq)
    We currently have version 4.0.1.00.03 installed.
    Is there an issue with this version and what I am trying to do or is there something wrong with what I'm doing? The SQL returns the proper results if I run it in the SQL workshop so I'm at a loss here and if anyone can help it would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Bruce

    The value is correct. I can run the entire SQL in workshop using parameter substitutions and it returns all the values correctly. So running this
    SELECT role_name d, role_seq r
    FROM apex_app_roles ar
    WHERE security_level = 1
    AND :F2500_APP_USER in
    (SELECT au.user_id FROM
    apex_app_user au,
    apex_app_user_roles auar
    WHERE ar.role_seq = auar.role_seq
    AND auar.user_seq = au.user_seq)
    UNION
    SELECT role_name d, role_seq r
    FROM APEX_APP_ROLES ar
    WHERE security_level = 0
    ORDER BY 1
    returns all the rows and looks like this.
    D     R
    ACP_ADMIN     3
    READ_ONLY     2
    READ_WRITE_ALL     1
    SERVICE_DESK_ADMIN     4

  • LOV with custom popup in af:query

    Hi,
    We have a use case where we need to display an LOV field in Search Panel (af:query). But, the LOV in Search Panel should be displayed with a custom popup.
    Is it possible display a field in Search Panel as input LOV with custom popup ?

    Hi,
    Is it possible display a field in Search Panel as input LOV with custom popup ?
    Yes. You assign a LOV definition to the attribute that then you display in the af:query component. You can also have dependnet LOV implemented this way. However, you cannot have a custom (your own) list of value popup dialog used
    See page 8 and following in http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/developer-tools/adf/learnmore/jan2011-otn-harvest-300940.pdf
    Frank
    Edited by: Frank Nimphius on Jun 29, 2011 11:36 AM

Maybe you are looking for