Extractor "2LIS_02_SCL".

hi
Anybody know how BUDAT fonctionne in extractor "2LIS_02_SCL".
best regard
francoise

hi,
check this out.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/8d/bc383fe58d5900e10000000a114084/content.htm
BUDAT u2013 Posting Date
If the information in this field relates to an event in the purchase order, the field is filled with the posting date of the purchase order. If the information relates to a goods receipt or an invoice, the field is filled with the posting date of the corresponding document.
regards,
mahesh

Similar Messages

Extractor 2LIS_02_SCL -- behaviour when ELIKZ is set

Dear BI-colleagues,
we are actually facing an issue with the standard extractor 2LIS_02_SCL - schedule line Level of purchase orders.
Our system setup:
The data of this extractor needs to be used to measure a supplier service sevel based upon single schedule lines. My predecessor actually changed the standard definition of this extractor in the System (which might be a reason for our issue?!).
In the BW-System, one standard staging DSO has been created with the folling key:
- PO document number
- PO document position
- PO document schedule line
- field BWVORG --> process key to distinguish between purchasing, goods receipt and invoice receipt data
Coming to the issue....
We are using the following fields to measure the (on time) Service Level:
SLFDT statistical delivery date           = "to be" date
BUDAT booing date of GR / IR           = "as is" date
--> whenever the BUDAT is higher than SLFDT, the delivery was not in time
In case a purchase order position has more than one schedule line, we get into trouble using this logic. When the final delivery indicator (field ELIKZ) is set on position level, there are update records passed to the BW for all schedule lines of this position showing as BUDAT the date when ELIKZ was set. Example:
Record      Record date     Sched. line     SLFDT               BUDAT               Comment
1               01.04.2014          1                    01.04.2014     01.04.2014          on time
2               10.04.2014          2                    10.04.2014     10.04.2014          on time
3               15.04.2014          3                    15.04.2014     15.04.2014          with this partial delivery the ELIKZ was set
4               15.04.2014          1                    01.04.2014     15.04.2014          not in time
5               15.04.2014          2                    10.04.2014     15.04.2014          due to record 3, a new BUDAT arrives for line 2 --> not in time
Unfortunately it's not as easy as e.g. just deleting incoming records having the same BUDAT as the last schedule line, as there are some intended processes which can lead to a later BUDAT (e.g. cancellations, corrections...)
Does anyone know if this is the Standard behaviour of this Extractor? How can I solve my issue?
Thank you in advance,
Andre

Dear Gajesh,
thank you for your remark.
Yes indeed the schedule line is in the key of the staging DSO. But as already said, the issue is that there are update records coming for ALL schedule lines whenever the ELIKZ is set on Position Level. From my Point of view the correct behaviour would be to deliver only update records for the last schedule line (the latest line). In my example the records 4 & 5 should never arrive in the BW system.
On BW side there are no modifications done for this Extractor.. the above mentioned examples are taken out of the PSA table, not from the DSO.
My requirement is either to stop transferring records 4 & 5 and/or to filter them somehow out in the BW-System, which is - from my point of view - almost impossible. I've already done a deep analysis of the incoming records in the PSA table and I couldn't find any way to separate these records from other, correct ones.
You said my example is not the standard behaviour... What would it be in this case (and how to restore standard)?
Thanks and best regards,
Andre

Extractor 2LIS_02_SCL and AFS-Contracts

Hi together,
we use in our AFS-system contracts with schedule-lines and
we need the contract-information in BW.
The extractor 2LIS_02_SCL don't extract this infomations.
Someone can help me.
Thank you in advance

Hi Roberto,
i have found my problem:
Report: LMCRSF01
Form: ANREICHERN_EKET
Tranfer Mengen/Werte zuweisen
      CASE zeitp.
        WHEN con_zeitp_bestellung.     "Bestellung
          xmceket-bwmng = xmceket-menge.
          xmceket-bwgeoo = xmceket-menge * x_effw.
          xmceket-bwgvo = xmceket-menge * x_vpom.
          xmceket-bwgvp = xmceket-menge * x_vpmm.
        WHEN con_zeitp_we_zu_best.     " WE zur Bestellg
          xmceket-bwmng = xmceket-wemng.
*... Only for valuated GR
          IF xmcekpo-weunb IS INITIAL.                      "558508
            xmceket-bwgvo = xmceket-wemng * x_vpom.
            xmceket-bwgvp = xmceket-wemng * x_vpmm.
          ENDIF.
          xmceket-bwgeo = xmceket-wewrt.
        WHEN con_zeitp_rechnung.       "Rechnung
          xmceket-bwmng = xmceket-remng.
          xmceket-bwgeo = xmceket-rewrt.
        WHEN con_zeitp_lieferplan.     "Lieferplan
          xmceket-bwmng = xmceket-menge.
          xmceket-bwgeoo = xmceket-menge * x_epom.
          xmceket-bwgvo = xmceket-menge * x_vpom. "Operat.: keine VP-
          xmceket-bwgvp = xmceket-menge * x_vpmm. "Operat.: keine VP-E
        WHEN OTHERS.
>> my comment : ignore      inquiry and contract
Nicht verarbeitete Vorgänge: z.b. Anfrage, Kontrakt <
          xmceket-bwmng = xmceket-menge.             <
          xmceket-bwgeoo = xmceket-menge * x_epom.    <
          xmceket-bwgvo = xmceket-menge * x_vpom.    <
          xmceket-bwgvp = xmceket-menge * x_vpmm.    <
      ENDCASE.
and i must solve this problem myself with
generic extractor EKET (Function module)
on the BW site consolidate item and schedule line in a new ODS
Thank's for trying to help me.
I hope the solution of this problem is helpful for someone
regards
thorsten

FULL is not FULL ? - extractor 2LIS_02_SCL

Hi Experts,
I have a problem with the loading from R/3 to BW regarding extractor 2LIS_02_SCL
Earlier we loaded the infoprovider in BW with DELTA but now we want to use FULL instead.
Theproblem is that our FULL load do not seems to get everything without filling a new SETUP
I have an exemple:
The FULL Load before filling a new SETUP shows a old Delivery Date, the user have change the date I ME38 in R/3 but
after filling a new SETUP the new date appears.
We have tested to set the InfoPackage to Repair Full Request but no difference.
Please help me to describe this and why FULL is not FULL.
Regards
Kerstin

Hi,
The information I had was that you only use SETUP table when to make an INIT-load and that FULL loads is independent of the SETUP but as I understand from you guys is that LIS extractors have to have a new SETUP table when to make a new FULL also. Correct?
I don't want a daily full load of 2LIS_02_SCL, that was only an exemple
Regards
Kerstin

Purcahsign data tables for the extractors 2lis_02_scl and 2lis_02_itm

Hi,
Can any one tell in which tables the purchasing data is stored in R/3
Thanks in Advance
Dru

Hi........
EKKO >> Purchase document
EKPO >> Purchase document (item level)
EKPV >> Shipping-Specific Data on Stock Tfr. for Purch. Doc. Item
EINA >>Purchase info record (main data)
EINE >> Purchase info record (organizational data)
EBAN >> Purchase requisition
EBKN >> Purchase Requisition Account Assignment
T024 >> Purchasing Groups
EKET >> Scheduled lines
EKES >> Vendor confirmed lines
Regards,
Debjani......

Starling lines with the 2LIS_02_SCL extractor.

Hi expert.
I have got a problem with the schedule line purchasing extractor, 2LIS_02_SCL.
I noted that the extractor extract many more lines that those present in a purchasing order. In particular, it extracts also deleted items and the corresponding starling items. When I speak of deleted items, I am not referring to those items whose fields LOEKZ is evaluated (these items appears in the order), but I am speaking of lines which does not appear in the order.
Now, I need to filter out these items. I saw that the deleted lines can be recognised through the field ROCANCEL.
The problem is: How can I distinguish the starling lines?
Can someone help me?
Thanks in advance
Andrea

Thanks Jain, but what you are suggesting does not resolve my issue. I try to explain me better.
The estractor estract one line, which is deleted (ROCANCEL = X). THis line has NETW = X and another fields, let us say AA not evaluated. Then I Have a starling line, which will have NETW = -X and AA not evaluated. Then I Have the right item, with NETW = Y and AA opportunely evaluated. Now, only the right line is the one that I have to carry in my DSO. In the PSA I have all the three lines, but unfortunately the last one (the one which goes in the DSO) is not the rigth one (but, almost ever, is the starling line for which the field AA, which is the field I am interested in, is not evaluated).
Very strange, isn't it?
Some ideas?

Filling the 2LIS_02_SCL extractor.

Hi experts,
I am an abap programmer but i am now starting working on a BW project to become a junior BW consultant.
I am now trying to fill the extractor 2LIS_02_SCL. Qhen i go to the RSA3 transaction on the R3 sistem, i see that it is now empty. How can i fill it on the r3 system? it is the first time i'm doing this, excuse me if the quation is too basic.I'll later charge this data to the BW system.
Thank you very much!

Hi
Please have a look at the below url..it gives an idea how to go with LO extraction
LO step by step procedure
Hope it helps
Thanks,
Teja

2LIS_02_SCL extractor is delivering wrong document currency amount

Dear all,
We are currently trying to get the invoiced amount of a purchase order in the document currency (of the invoice). While extracting the Purchasing Orders via the 2LIS_02_SCL we discover that the invoiced amount in document currency (BWGEOO) is wrong (if document currency is not matching local currency). However the invoiced amount in local currency (BWGEO) is correct.
It seems that the BWGEOO is calculated from the local currency field by using the PO header exchange rate (EKKO-WKURS). If we take the exchange rate (RBKP-KURSF) from the invoice header and apply it on the extracted invoiced amount in local currency, we get the correct value.
- Does anyone have some information how the extractor is working (which source table is taken into account)?
- Why is the local currency matching and the document currency not?
- Do you have experienced the same issue? Do you have any solution for this problem?
Thank you.
Regards,
    Michael

Hi,
There are several Notes around this issue, but none of them is solving our problem:
     856004 Invoice value and GR value in extractor 2LIS_02_SCL
     838670 Net value for BWGEO and BWGEOO
     833209 BWGEO and BWGEOO values
The field BWGEOO is delivering a cost based value in document currency out of the PO. This means it is calculating it (quantity * net price). But we needed the actual invoiced amount out of FI.
We found a work-around for this System Design issue. We are going to extract the exchange rate out of the invoice header and apply it to the invoiced amount (REWERT) out of the 2LIS_02_SCL extractor.
Logic to extract it is:
Join the Document Header: Invoice Receipt (RBKP) with the Document Item: Incoming Invoice (RSEG) on Invoice document number (BELNR) and Fiscal Year (GJAHR) key fields. Out of the Item table the purchase order document number (EBELN) and the PO item number (EBELP) can be derived. The exchange rates need to be loaded out of the header (KURSF).
Does anyone of you have additional documentation/information on how the LO extractors (e.g. 2LIS_02_SCL) are working and especially the details of the values (and the definition) out of the extractor?
Thank you.
Regards,
    Michael

2LIS_02_SCL / Getting both Posting dates of goods receipt & invoice receipt at the same time

Hi,
I have created a DSO based on the schedule lines standard extractor 2LIS_02_SCL.
The keys of this DSO are PO Number, PO Item and Schedule Line number.
I have succeed to get some key figures like PO Quantity, GR Quantity and Invoice Receipt Quantity according to the Process Key value.
Furthermore, I'd like to get too the goods receipt date (Process Key = 02,12,22).
In order to do that I wrote a small routine in the transformation rule for my target field which fill it only if the process key is 02, 12 or 22.
The problem is that it doesn't work well because of the invoice records in my source package...
Indeed when there is an invoice in my PSA for a schedule line, my target field (GR date char) is empty (for these schedule lines, last record is Invoice Receipt type). So it means my transformation rule works but is overwritten by an blank value when there is a process key 03,13 or 23 (invoice Receipt type).
Do you have a idea to solve my issue ?
Thank you very much

Hi.
You have to write start or end routines for this scenario, not the field level routine since it gets overwrite with last record values....
overall logic is:
Collect GR date per PO Num, PO Item and PO SCH. Lin num..like you have internal table with PO number, PO Item and PO Sch line number and GR date. First you have to go through source_package or result_package and fill up that temporary internal table
And than again go through source_package or result_package and READ that temporary table and fill GR date for all records of same PO sch. lines ..hope this resolves the issue.
I would prefer end routine if you have posting date in DSO or target structure
this is little bit complex, so you need ABAP skills....

2LIS_02_SCL

hello
in the extractor we need the NETPR Net Price however i see that there is the variance in the value the what i see in EKPO/EKKO table. The help mentions it is a calculated key figure -
I need the net price that is the PO line items to reflect any idea how to make it work and what calculation logic is used by standard extractor
rgds
Ram
*points assured

Hi Andrea,
As far as I know there are some problems with extractor 2lis_02_scl. In my previous client we had problems with the "delivery completed" flag, that was not always correctly updated.
What we finally got from SAP is that we should update R/3 Plug-in to latest version, cause there that extractor behaved better (it was version 3.1).
Maybe you have to open a customer message to SAP...
Regards,
David.

Problems with 2LIS_02_sCL

Hi,
I am facing more or less the similar problem.
I am using 2LIS_02_SCL to pull purchasing data from R3.
and using 3 process keys for Po, GR,Invoice for this extractor.
the extract structure is enhanced to add the delivery indicator and is populated by the code by looking up at the EKPO table irrespective of the process key.
Which means that ideally if indicator was set for Po,item for process key 1 then the indicator should be set for process keys 2 and 3 as well. But I have identified some records where DELEIVERY COMPLETED INDICATOR was set for process key 1 but not for 2 and 3.
Can any one help me on this.
Regards
Sudheer

Hi Andrea,
As far as I know there are some problems with extractor 2lis_02_scl. In my previous client we had problems with the "delivery completed" flag, that was not always correctly updated.
What we finally got from SAP is that we should update R/3 Plug-in to latest version, cause there that extractor behaved better (it was version 3.1).
Maybe you have to open a customer message to SAP...
Regards,
David.

2lis_02_scl and 2lis_02_itm

Hi developers,
I've activated the extractors 2lis_02_scl and 2lis_02_itm, when I do the initalitation in the setup tables I don't see any record also if in the execution log there are 7230 documents.
Any ideas to solve my problem?
Best Regards!

Hi Roberto,
Thanks for your answer!
You have understood my problem! After the setup OLI3BW for MM-PUR in the table MC02M_0SCLSETUP and MC02M_0ITMSETUP there are not entry and in LBWE I've activated the extractors.
The Extractor LIS for area MM Stock and SD work perfectly.
The problem is only for 02MM! I've opened an OSS note but none answer!
Can you help me, plese?
Thanks a lot!

Deleting invoice document from the 2LIS_02_SCL

Hi,
I have a requirement that i need to delete the invlice documents from purchasing extraction into BW.
This is particular to invioce document type 'ZRS',I need to delete these invoice document types entering into BW system
I know purchasing related invoice values will come using extractor 2LIS_02_SCL. Is there any indicator that I can use
to eliminate these invoice types.
Your help is appreciated and rewarded.
Thanks
KM

Hi,
Are you going to create a new DSO over 2LIS_02_SCL, you can write code in start routine to delete documents with
doc type = 'ZRS'. Delete source_package where doc_type = 'ZRS'.
If the DSO is available - then for existing content you can do selective deletion,for future loads you can add exclusion in DTP filter like doc_type 'not equal to' ZRS.

Mapping 0IR_VAL_RET and 0IR_QTY_RET with extrator 2LIS_02_SCL

hi
i used the 0PURC01 and with extractor 2LIS_02_SCL and i don't know how i can mapping 0IR_VAL_RET ( Invoiced amount, returns) and (0IR_QTY_RET Invoice receipt quantity, returns) with extrator 2LIS_02_SCL
best regard
francoise

Hi ,
The following fileds are source fields for the Info objects
REWRT_R - 0IR_VAL_RET
REMNG_R - 0IR_QTY_RET
As you mentione the fields are not available in LO DS : 2LIS_02_SCL of purchsing.But those fields will be available in the LIS DS : 2LIS_02_S012.
So please find the table for the source field from the LIS DS : 2LIS_02_S012.So based on the table u can do enhance the LO DS : 2LIS_02_SCL.
Regards
Ram.

GR Date and 2LIS_02_SCL

I am looking to include Goods Receipt date in some of my purchasing reports. I am not able to locate any standard content data targets that include this information.
The extractor 2LIS_02_SCL provides the Process Key (BWVORG) relevant for Goods Receipt documents. Does anyone know which date we should use in combination with this process key to get the GR Date for each Schedule Line?
Thanks!

Hi Mustafa:
For the necessary steps take a look at the article by Aakash Deep Arora / Nikhil Santosh Saxena (specially from page 12 on).
"Setting up Delta Process for LO Extractors for First Time Using Queued Delta"
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/d019f683-eac1-2b10-40a6-cfe48796a4ca?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true
Regards,
Francisco Milán.

Extractor "2LIS_02_SCL".

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for