EXW price is not getting picked up during preference determination

HI .. all,
We have transferred Sales order from ECC to GTS. But during prreferrence determination, EXW price of the Sales order is not getting picked up.
Please suggest if any configuration is missing .
Thnks in Advance .

Hi Sapcongts,
Of course you should not modify standard SAP code, and I will not help you to do that.
I don't agree with your idea of proposed and actual EXW values. The Sales Order is your way of recording the customer's Purchase Order, and the price should be fixed at that point. The billing process should not change the agreed price of the goods - only perhaps re-calculate taxes and any other charges that could not be confirmed at the time of order.
If your standard prices are offered as FOB, then I can understand your needing to subtract some components to reach the EXW price, but in that case you will have problems transferring the correct amount to GTS. As I mentioned earlier, you can manipulate the data in the BAdI /SAPSLL/IFEX_SD0A_R3, but I had not looked closely enough at this specific requirement. Unfortunately the pricing table KONV is not provided in the BAdI and that data will not yet be available in the database. Provided the elements to be subtracted are to be read from Master Data, then you could make that same subtraction again in the BAdI. But if there are complex dependencies, it might not be easy.
Having looked in more detail at the code, I think you would be reasonably entitled to complain to SAP about missing functionality here. In the ERP system, the SD pricing provides a specific sub-total (KOMP-PREVA: subtotal 8) for Preference Value, and you can easily configure that to be filled after your subtractions. But that subtotal is not used in the GTS mapping, and I think that's a mistake. You might want to create an OSS message about it, requesting that the GTS Preference value be taken from the sub-total that was clearly designed exactly for that purpose.
In any case, good luck with the project.
Regards,
Dave

Similar Messages

Delivery Condition not getting picked up during IV

Dear All,
We are facing a problem, while posting IV thru MIRO, delivery condition(e.g. FRB1-Freight (Value)- NN) is not getting calculated automatically.
Is some customization settings missing?
Thanks in Advance,
Ritesh.

IN MIRO U select 3 rd Option Goods/ Service item + Planned Delivery cost
Then in the MIRO Freight will come
Other wise select 2nd Option in this case only Freight will come
Biswajit

Billing pricing not getting picked up

I created a sales invoice with reference a sales order. In the sales order the price was getting picked up and was displayed.
Delivery was also created. But when the invoice was created and saved the net value is shown as 0. Price is not getting picked up.
The option which many other consultants has given was to cancel the invoice and re create a new invoice. But we want the price to be picked in the same invoice.
This happened only for 5 invoices which was created on a particular day. These 5 inovices show a net value of 0.
Could you please help me out to resolve this issue.
Thanks very much.

Hi,
Please check if the document pricing procedure is same for Order type and billing type.
If its not same please check what is the pricing procedure system taking for Billing document procedure.
In that pricing procedure check what is the Base price condition type.
Check whether condition records maintained for that condition type.
Iff no records maintain then use VK11 to create new condition records.
Then go to Item data - Conditions in billing document press Update button and use B-Carry out new pricing.
Revert if you need more elaborate explanation.
Best Regards,

Tax code not getting picked up from PO during SES

Dear Experts,
I am looking for configuration where the end user need not enter Tax code during SES. I tried a scenario where I did not maintain any service master and also did not enter any line item in service tab at item level, rather I processed my PO using limits.
Now when I prepare SES using this PO, Tax code is not getting picked up from PO and some tax code(I1) appears. Since I don't want end user to input any tax code I've left it blank.
Finally when I am doing MIRO, i am not able select the desired Tax code(say I8) as it is not available for selection. I get only one Tax code(say I1) available for selection. Even other Tax codes are not available for selection.
Please advise, how do I resolve this, why is the Tax code not getting picked up in SES? and why am I not getting other tax codes for selection in MIRO?
Thanks and Regards
Mansih

Hi,
Tax for service maintained in the service PO in the INVOICE TAB in item details. You are not going to maintain the service tax during SES. In SES you are just recognizing / confirming the vendor performed /completed the required service given to him.
During invoice tax code will flow from service PO to Invoice & you need to just select check box u201Ccalculate taxu201D & remove default tax code in MIRO, if any tax code set for default entry in MIRO. If you want your service tax code should appear in the MIRO screen then just activate in t.code:OBZT (relevant for all transaction),then you can select your service tax code during invoice verification WRT service PO.
Regards,
Biju K

Particular Perner not getting picked during simulation/ Live Run - Payroll

Hi Experts
Payroll program is not picking up a particular perner during execution when executed by payroll admin of that country . We have checked the SU53 dump and found no errors . All authorizations are in place.The payroll admin had executed the payroll for this perner last month without any issue.No org / master data changes made in last 2 month. The perner is not getting picked up in simulation and live mode. Please advice
Regards
Sriram

Dear Sriram,
Check infotype 0003 for the particular employee.
Find Weather the employee is locked.If locked do the deselection and run the payroll.
Regards,
Sairam.

Purchase Req & Standard PO - Price is not getting Defaulted from Price List

Dear All,
Hope you are doing good!!!
We are implementing R12.1 for one of our client. This query is pertaining to the Advance Pricing with Purchasing. Infact client wants to default the Purchase Requisition and Standard Purchase Order Price from Price List.
I have done entire setup and defined ASL for this reason. But still price is not getting defulted from Contract Purchase Ageerement.
What could be the reason. Its an standard fucntionality but still its not picking up.
I would really appreciate if someone could help me on this. Its URGENT.
Thanks in Advance.
Thanks & Regards,
Aditya

Let us go through the steps involved in integrating Advanced Pricing with Purchasing so that we know if we have missed anything.
1. Create Price Lists in Advanced Pricing.
2. Setup Profile Options in System Administrator responsibility:
QP: Licensed for Product - at Application: Purchasing level = Purchasing.
QP: Pricing Transaction Entity - at Application: Purchasing level = Procurement
( Site level - ‘Order Fulfillment’ )
Profile option can be set at site, application, and user levels.
QP: Source System Code – at Application: Purchasing level = Oracle Purchasing
( Site level -- ‘Oracle Pricing’ )
Profile can be set at site and responsibility levels.
QP: Item Validation Organization - at Application: Purchasing level = null
( Site level -- specified in Financial Options )
Profile option can be set at site and responsibility levels.
3. Add item to the Price list Advanced Pricing ->Price Lists -> Price List Setup.
Enter the item/price/dates etc.
4. Create Contract Purchase Agreement.
5. Create Approved Suppliers List. In the Source Documents, select the Type as Contract and reference the Contract Agreement Number.
Create the Sourcing Rule and add the Rule to the Assignment Set.
6. Create the Standard Purchase Order referencing the Contract Purchase Agreement in the Reference Documents.
The Price listed should be defaulted from the Price Lists.
Cross-Check the following steps and let me know if it still fails and we can try to resolve from then on :)

Future price is not getting updated as current price when period changed

Hi all,
We follow the following procedure to update standard price in material master. Our organization is a manufacturer of pharma products. ( System is not live yet)
We have BoM's for all FG's and all FG's & SFG's are having Price control indicator as "S". Rest other materials are valuated for Moving Average price.
> Run T-code CK11n for the FG.
> Check whether costs of utilities and final product is as per the cost sheets prepared manually (10-20% difference acceptable)
> Do not save it and goto CK40n tcode. Mark and release price of FG's & SFG's for the current date (eg: 16.01.2008). Now as 10th period of year 2008 was not open at that time and only 9 th period of year 2007 was open, the prices were updated as "FUTURE PRICE" in costing-2 view of material master.
> Now that when i am opening 10th period (both financial period and inventory period), my future price is not getting updated as my CURRENT PRICE in material master as my standard price.
Pls. reply to this urgently.

Hi,
I am sure about it that when CK40n was done for a future date when some n-1 period was open, the costs released would get updated as future price.
When the period for which future price was updated is opened as current period, the future price automatically gets updated as current price and is also set as standard price in accounting 1 view.
But i m unable to identify why is not working.

Release Strategy for Contract is not getting picked whereas it is ok for PO

Dear Experts,
I have created release strategy for PO with doc type, p.org, net value as chars and frg_ekko as class and release group as 02.
I kept NB,FO,MK and WK as char values. it is working fine for PO's whereas it is not getting picked for Contracts. we need same release strategy for PO as well as for Contract.
Kindly resolve the issue.
Satish

S0004830404 wrote:
Dear Experts,
>
> I have created release strategy for PO with doc type, p.org, net value as chars and frg_ekko as class and release group as 02.
> I kept NB,FO,MK and WK as char values. it is working fine for PO's whereas it is not getting picked for Contracts. we need same release strategy for PO as well as for Contract.
>
> Kindly resolve the issue.
>
> Satish
hi,
use create other characteristic for value CEKKO-GNETW in this use the mk , wk values in value field and assign this characteristic to your class and save.
Thanking you

Index is not getting picked even after providing hint

Hi All
The index pk_sku is not getting picked even after providing the hints when executing the query.Please kindly give me such recommendations.I am providing the information.
select * from
(select /*+ index(s pk_sku) */
      to_char(t.dstamp, 'YYYYmmDDHH24MI') as sort_1,
      t.client_id as CLIENT_ID ,
      t.site_id as SITE_ID,
      tz.time_zone_name as TIME_ZONE_NAME     ,
      t.owner_id as OWNER_ID,
      t.sku_id as SKU_ID,
      t.reason_id as ADJUST_TYPE,
      to_char(t.dstamp+tz.diff/24, 'DD/mm/YYYY HH24:MI') as ADJUST_DATETIME,
      t.reference_id as RECEIPT_ID,
      t.batch_id as BATCH_ID,
      t.update_qty as UPDATE_QTY,
      t.lock_code as LOCK_CODE,
      s.description as SKU_DESCRIPTION
from mv_inventory_transaction t
      JOIN timezone tz ON tz.site_id = t.site_id ,
       mv_sku s
where   t.sku_id= s.sku_id
and     t.client_id=s.client_id
and   ( :client is null or :client = t.client_id)
and    ( :site is null or t.site_id in (:site))
and    ( :owner is null or t.owner_id in (:owner))
and    t.code= 'Adjustment'
and   (t.dstamp+tz.diff/24) between to_date(:dateFrom, 'DD/mm/yyyy') and to_date(:dateTo,'DD/mm/yyyy')+1
and      (:sku is null or t.sku_id in (:sku))
UNION ALL
(select /*+ index(s pk_sku) */
     to_char(t.dstamp, 'YYYYmmDDHH24MI') as sort_1,
    t.client_id as CLIENT_ID ,
      t.site_id as SITE_ID,
                      tz.time_zone_name as TIME_ZONE_NAME     ,
      t.owner_id as OWNER_ID,
      t.sku_id as SKU_ID,
      t.reason_id as ADJUST_TYPE,
      to_char(t.dstamp+tz.diff/24, 'DD/mm/YYYY HH24:MI') as ADJUST_DATETIME,
      t.reference_id as RECEIPT_ID,
      t.batch_id as BATCH_ID,
      t.update_qty as UPDATE_QTY,
      t.lock_code as LOCK_CODE,
      s.description as SKU_DESCRIPTION
from mv_inventory_transaction_arch t
      JOIN timezone tz ON tz.site_id = t.site_id,
       mv_sku s
where   t.sku_id= s.sku_id
and     t.client_id=s.client_id
and   ( :client is null or :client = t.client_id)
and    ( :site is null or t.site_id in (:site))
and    ( :owner is null or t.owner_id in (:owner))
and    t.code= 'Adjustment'
and   (t.dstamp+tz.diff/24) between to_date(:dateFrom, 'DD/mm/yyyy') and to_date(:dateTo,'DD/mm/yyyy')+1
and      (:sku is null or t.sku_id in (:sku))
order by sort_1,2,3,4,5
version = Release 10.1.0.5.0
SQL> sho parameter optimizer
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
optimizer_dynamic_sampling           integer     2
optimizer_features_enable            string      10.1.0.5
optimizer_index_caching              integer     0
optimizer_index_cost_adj             integer     100
optimizer_mode                       string      ALL_ROWS
sho parameter db_file_multiblock_count_read
sho parameter cursor_sharing
SQL> sho parameter optimizer
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
optimizer_dynamic_sampling           integer     2
optimizer_features_enable            string      10.1.0.5
optimizer_index_caching              integer     0
optimizer_index_cost_adj             integer     100
optimizer_mode                       string      ALL_ROWS
SQL> sho parameter db_file_multi
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
db_file_multiblock_read_count        integer     16
SQL> sho parameter cursor_sharing
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
cursor_sharing                       string      EXACTExplain plan
| Id | Operation                              | Name                          | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                       |                               |    56 | 29736 |   345K (1)| 01:09:07 |
|   1 | SORT ORDER BY                         |                               |    56 | 29736 |   345K (1)| 01:09:07 |
|   2 |   VIEW                                 |                               |    56 | 29736 |   345K (1)| 01:09:07 |
|   3 |    UNION-ALL                           |                               |       |       |            |          |
|   4 |     NESTED LOOPS                       |                               |     2 |   984 | 29686   (1)| 00:05:57 |
|   5 |      HASH JOIN                         |                               |     1 |   326 | 26870   (1)| 00:05:23 |
|   6 |       TABLE ACCESS FULL                | TIMEZONE                      |     4 |    88 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   7 |       VIEW                             | MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION      |    25 | 7600 | 26866   (1)| 00:05:23 |
|   8 |        UNION-ALL                       |                               |       |       |            |          |
|   9 |         FILTER                         |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 10 |          MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION      |     1 |    67 | 24327   (1)| 00:04:52 |
| 11 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN             | IDX_CODE_CLIENTID_690         | 79681 |       |   518   (1)| 00:00:07 |
| 12 |         FILTER                         |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 13 |          MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION      |    24 | 2328 | 2539   (1)| 00:00:31 |
| 14 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN             | IDX_CODE_646                  | 9269 |       |    46   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 15 |      VIEW                              | MV_SKU                        |    37 | 6142 | 2816   (1)| 00:00:34 |
| 16 |       UNION-ALL                        |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 17 |        MAT_VIEW ACCESS FULL            | MV_SKU                        |   335K|    10M| 2535   (1)| 00:00:31 |
| 18 |        MAT_VIEW ACCESS FULL            | MV_SKU                        | 37839 | 1699K|   280   (1)| 00:00:04 |
| 19 |     NESTED LOOPS                       |                               |    54 | 26568 |   315K (1)| 01:03:10 |
| 20 |      HASH JOIN                         |                               |     1 |   326 |   313K (1)| 01:02:37 |
| 21 |       TABLE ACCESS FULL                | TIMEZONE                      |     4 |    88 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 22 |       VIEW                             | MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH |   576 |   171K|   313K (1)| 01:02:37 |
| 23 |        UNION-ALL                       |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 24 |         FILTER                         |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 25 |          MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH |     1 |    72 | 19258   (1)| 00:03:52 |
| 26 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN             | QUI_IDX_INVTRANS_ARC1         | 36016 |       |   287   (1)| 00:00:04 |
| 27 |         FILTER                         |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 28 |          MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH |   575 | 55200 |   293K (1)| 00:58:45 |
| 29 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN             | QUI_IDX_INVTRANS_ARC1         |   367K|       | 3466   (1)| 00:00:42 |
| 30 |      VIEW                              | MV_SKU                        |    37 | 6142 | 2816   (1)| 00:00:34 |
| 31 |       UNION-ALL                        |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 32 |        MAT_VIEW ACCESS FULL            | MV_SKU                        |   335K|    10M| 2535   (1)| 00:00:31 |
| 33 |        MAT_VIEW ACCESS FULL            | MV_SKU                        | 37839 | 1699K|   280   (1)| 00:00:04 |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------when put in sql tuning advisor,It recommended with better plan using indexes
| Id | Operation                              | Name                          | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                       |                               |    56 | 29736 |   340K (1)| 01:08:01 |
|   1 | SORT ORDER BY                         |                               |    56 | 29736 |   340K (1)| 01:08:01 |
|   2 |   VIEW                                 |                               |    56 | 29736 |   340K (1)| 01:08:01 |
|   3 |    UNION-ALL                           |                               |       |       |            |          |
|   4 |     NESTED LOOPS                       |                               |     2 |   848 | 26900   (1)| 00:05:23 |
|   5 |      HASH JOIN                         |                               |     1 |   326 | 26898   (1)| 00:05:23 |
|   6 |       TABLE ACCESS FULL                | TIMEZONE                      |     4 |    88 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   7 |       VIEW                             | MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION      |    25 | 7600 | 26894   (1)| 00:05:23 |
|   8 |        UNION-ALL                       |                               |       |       |            |          |
|   9 |         FILTER                         |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 10 |          MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION      |     1 |    67 | 24352   (1)| 00:04:53 |
| 11 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN             | IDX_CODE_CLIENTID_690         | 79681 |       |   518   (1)| 00:00:07 |
| 12 |         FILTER                         |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 13 |          MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION      |    24 | 2328 | 2542   (1)| 00:00:31 |
| 14 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN             | IDX_CODE_646                  | 9269 |       |    46   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 15 |      VIEW                              | MV_SKU                        |    37 | 3626 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 16 |       UNION-ALL PARTITION              |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 17 |        MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | MV_SKU                        |     1 |    34 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 18 |         INDEX UNIQUE SCAN              | PK_SKU                        |     1 |       |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 19 |        MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | MV_SKU                        |     1 |    46 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 20 |         INDEX UNIQUE SCAN              | PK_SKU                        |     1 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 21 |     NESTED LOOPS                       |                               |    54 | 22896 |   313K (1)| 01:02:38 |
| 22 |      HASH JOIN                         |                               |     1 |   326 |   313K (1)| 01:02:38 |
| 23 |       TABLE ACCESS FULL                | TIMEZONE                      |     4 |    88 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 24 |       VIEW                             | MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH |   576 |   171K|   313K (1)| 01:02:38 |
| 25 |        UNION-ALL                       |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 26 |         FILTER                         |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 27 |          MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH |     1 |    72 | 19269   (1)| 00:03:52 |
| 28 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN             | QUI_IDX_INVTRANS_ARC1         | 36016 |       |   287   (1)| 00:00:04 |
| 29 |         FILTER                         |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 30 |          MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH |   575 | 55200 |   293K (1)| 00:58:47 |
| 31 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN             | QUI_IDX_INVTRANS_ARC1         |   367K|       | 3466   (1)| 00:00:42 |
| 32 |      VIEW                              | MV_SKU                        |    37 | 3626 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 33 |       UNION-ALL PARTITION              |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 34 |        MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | MV_SKU                        |     1 |    34 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 35 |         INDEX UNIQUE SCAN              | PK_SKU                        |     1 |       |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 36 |        MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | MV_SKU                        |     1 |    46 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 37 |         INDEX UNIQUE SCAN              | PK_SKU                        |     1 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------So ,after checking the recommended plan I tried to execute the query with the hints,even then it is picking up the indexes in the explain plan.So please kindly help in solving the issue
The pk_sku is the index created on client_id and sku_id columns
Thanks
GV

riedelme wrote:
My experience is differernt - hints will be followed if the optimizer determines they will be beneficial and not if they will not, including my current project on 11gR2. The example below (unfortunately only 11gR1) disproves your theory, showing the index hint is followed and that the cost increases by a factor of five.
The most common cases of the optimizer apparently ignoring a hint are due to operator error, the hint is not well formed, or cannot be followed. There are a couple of documented cases where a hint will be ignored - first_rows used in CTAS is one.
Jonathan Lewis writes a lot about it on his blog showing that the optimizer always acts on a well formed hint if it is at all possible.
SQL> create table t (n number not null, c varchar2(1000));
Table created.
SQL> insert into t select 1, rpad('x',1000,'x')
2 from dual connect by level <= 50000;
50000 rows created.
SQL> create index t_ix on t (n);
Index created.
SQL> exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(user, 't', cascade => true)
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> explain plan for
2 select max(c) from t where n =1;
Explained.
SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display);
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 2966233522
| Id | Operation          | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT   |      |     1 | 1004 | 1574   (1)| 00:00:19 |
|   1 | SORT AGGREGATE    |      |     1 | 1004 |            |          |
|* 2 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL| T    | 50000 |    47M| 1574   (1)| 00:00:19 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
   2 - filter("N"=1)
14 rows selected.
SQL> explain plan for
2 select /*+ index (t t_ix) */ max(c) from t where n = 1;
Explained.
SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display);
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 3231292748
| Id | Operation                    | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT             |      |     1 | 1004 | 7244   (1)| 00:01:27 |
|   1 | SORT AGGREGATE              |      |     1 | 1004 |            |          |
|   2 |   TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T    | 50000 |    47M| 7244   (1)| 00:01:27 |
|* 3 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN          | T_IX | 50000 |       |    98   (0)| 00:00:02 |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   3 - access("N"=1)
15 rows selected.

PO creation wrt PR - value not getting picked

Hi,
Purchase orders are created with respect to fully approved Purchase requistions (Release proc is set for PR) but net price is not getting copied to PO from PR.
Please let me know how to resolve it
Regards,
Uzair

If the info record (or contract) is not wanted, it is possible to "adopt" the price from the purchase requisition>
Are you getting the error - 'Net price must be greater than 0' - For PO creation from a requisiton for materials the system tries to determine the price from a source (info records, quota arrangement, contract etc). It is possible to use configuration to have the purchase requisition price adopted (and hence not use any info record) for this you must make the following configuration.
Material Management -> Purchasing -> Authorization management ->
Define Function Authorization for Buyers.
In here choose: "Function Authorizations: Purchase order"
In here you may specify a number of Function Authorization keys.
For each key, you may set rights for the key.
The field in question is "Order price adoption" (T160D-EBPUEB) which
must be ticked.
Then back out and now choose "Maintain Users".
In here choose tab "Parameters" and enter parameter ID "EFB" along
with the value equal to the key you just maintained.
(Remember to use Capitals when entering the key value)
In ME51N in the item detail screen, tab "Valuation", the field
"PO price" will now be visible and can be maintained via a dropdown.
The field will have following possible values:
- "Do not adopt"
- "As gross price" and
- "As net price"
If "do not adopt" is selected (and this is deafult ) then the system will look for an info record, contract etc when creating PO
If Other two options are selected the price from the PR will be adopted into the PO (info record will not be considered)

GL Account is not getting picked by billing document

Hi Gurus,
one new GL account is set up by our FI team for a accrual condition type.
case 1:
Now when i have cancelled the previous created billing doc and trying to create again then the new GL account is not getting picked.
case 2:
Whereas when am doing the complete process flow like sales order creation, delivery and billing then the new GL account is getting picked.
Could you please let me know what would be the reason for this, why its not getting picked in first case.
Thanks,
Ashi

Hello Preety,
Unless you see the Revenue Account Determination Analysis for the Billing document, it is very difficult to understand the reason. Please click on the Environment >> Acc.Determination Analysis >> Revenue account in the VF03 screen and find the missing assignment.
Thanks,
Suman$

File not getting picked with Sender Adapter

Hello Experts,
i have configured file sender adapter which is polling configured directory every 60 sec. But i could see file not getting picked up. when looked into Communication channel monitoring i could see following error:
Putting message into send queue failed, due to: com.sap.aii.af.ra.ms.api.DuplicateMessageException : Message ID aa2ec9a0-44b3-11dc-9c5b-0003baa19669(OUTBOUND) already exists in database: com.sap.sql.DuplicateKeyException: ORA-00001: unique constraint (SAPDX1DB.SYS_C00120924) violated.
is this due to adapter cache. we are on SP20.
has anybody faced this problem earlier?
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Rajeev

Hello
actually there was small problem in file generation and hence it was failing in message mapping which is resolved. but still that problem is there when it is attempting to delete the file. hence it is not able to delete that file.
can we manually clear the send queues or should we refresh CPA cache?
Thanks
Rajeev

Output Message Type MAHN not getting picked up in PO

Hello Experts
   I have configured customized output type ZMAH (similar to MAHN) for reminder process. When I am creating PO this output type is not getting picked up automatically. If I am maintaining it manually I am able to send message for ME9F (Purchase Order) and ME91F (Reminder) successfully. Upon deremination analysis I am getting this message 502 " Output ignored (requirement 103 not fulfilled) ". Reminder are getting picked up from Purchase Value Key to PO.
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks
Ankit

Hello Tej
I have maintained output device but same result.
Here I am listing all parameters that I have used for configuration can anyone please take a look and let me know if I am missing anything
Steps for new Message Type for PO Reminder (ZMAH)
1.     Defined new Table 026 Purchasing Output Determination: Document Type
                                                    (ii) 027 Purchasing Output Determination: Purch. Org./Vendor for EDI
2.     Defined new access sequence Z515 Access Sequence for Archiving.
Following are parameters to the Access Sequence
Access Sequence Number = 1
Table = 026
Description = Purchasing Output Determination: Document Type
Requirement = 103
Exclusive = Yes (box checked)
Access Sequence Number = 2
Table = 027
Description = Purchasing Output Determination: Purch. Org./Vendor for EDI
Requirement = 103
Exclusive = Yes (box checked)
3.     Maintain Output Type ZMAH for PO
General Data
Access Sequence = Z515
Access to condition (Checked)
Multiple Issuing (Checked)
Change Output
Program = SAPFM06P
FORM Routine = ENTRY_NEU
Replacement of Text Symbol
Program = SAPMM06E
FORM Routine = TEXT_SYMBOL_REPLACE
Default Values
Dispatch Time = Send Immediately (when saving application)
Transmission Medium = External Send
Communication Strategy = 0001 (E-mail Document)
Processing Routines
Transmission Medium = 5 (External Send)
Program = SAPFM06P
Form Routine = ENTRY_NEU
Form = MEDRUCK
Partner Roles
Medium = External Send
Funct = VN
Name = Vendor
4.     Fine-Tuned Control: Purchase Order
Oprat. = 3
CType = ZMAH
Name = Output for Reminder
Short Text = Urging letter (expediter)/reminder
Update Print Related Data = Yes (checked)
5.     Maintain Message Determination Schema: Purchase Order
Procedure RMBEF1 (Purchase Order)
Step = 101
Cntr = 3
CTyp = ZMAH
Description = Output for Reminder
Requirement = 103
6.     Assign Schema to Purchase Order
Procedure RMBEF1
7.     Define Partner Roles for Purchase Order
Out. = ZMAH
Med = 5 (External Send)
Funct = VN
Name = Output for Reminder
Name = Vendor
8.     Test Condition Maintained in MN04 (Master Data)
Purch. Org. = 0001
Vendor = 101281
Partner Funct = VN
Medium = 5 (External Send)
Date/Time = 4 Send immediately (when saving application)
Output Device = LP01
Cover Page Text = Reminder PO number &EKKO-EBELN&
Also I have configured Purchasing Value Key, reminders are coming to PO correctly.
Thanks
Ankit

Debit Items not getting picked while making payment with F110

HI,
When making payment with F110, items with Debit balance is not getting picked.
Example:
Payment method is assigned in the Maser data.
For a particular vendor one item has a credit balance- posting key 31.
We have posted another JV with F-02 and debited that vendor with Posting key 21. (Payment Method is not entered in the line item)
When we run F110 the credit balance is picked and debit balance is being shown in exception list.
When we got to FB02 and insert payment method in debit line item and then again run the F110 then system pickes all line items and pays the net amount.
The question is why system is not considering Payment Method from Master Data in debit line item, while in credit line item it is picking payment method from the master data.
Do I need to do any setting for it so that it should automatically take payment method from master data even in case of Debit line items.
Regards
Sanjay

Hi All,
Thanks for your quick replies.
But it does not solve my problem.
When I am not assigning any payment method to either Debit or credit line items, system picks (payment method from Master data) for only credit line items and ignores debit line items.
But the problem is that when I assign payment method to debit line item (which is similar to what has been assigned to vendor Master Data) system groups both debit and credit line items and makes payment of only net amount.
My question was why system considered the debit line item for making payment if I manually enter payment method in the line item, if system has been designed only for out going payment. In my opinion It should have reacted similarly irrespective of whether payment method entered in the line item or not.
Regards
Sanjay

Items not getting picked up in Return sales order

Dear all,
I am creating a return sales order with reference to a sales order.
In my delivery doc the items can be categorised into 3 types:
1- Picking done; Movement type determined
2- Picking done; Movement type not determined
3- Picking not-done; Movement type determined
In the return order, only the items of 1st type are coming. Why others not getting picked up? Can they be entered manually?
regards
Sapshed

Dear Hrishikesh,
Thats Ok. Picking is done only for those items for which Relevant for Picking is ticked.
What I want to know is that, for items that have either their picking not done or Goods movement not determined, they are not getting automatically picked up while I create a Return order w/r to a sales order.
thanks
Sapshed

EXW price is not getting picked up during preference determination

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for