F-04 posting error - Consolidated companies

Dear all,
I have a error message for a particular customer while posting using T Code - F-04, I got an error message saying - " Consolidated Companies XXXX & "" are different.
Samunder Singh

HI,
Can u explain the Scenerio for which your working, whether ur using Cosolidation for all company codes.
Regards,
Sreekanth

Similar Messages

  • Error: Consolidated companies DCIUS and ' ' are different

    Hi All,
    When I try to post vendor invoice in FB60 I get the above given error . Message No. F5080.
    I have created a group company and assigned to the expense GL account master in trading partner field.
    GL is mapped to the group GL account.
    No error is shown if I enter the group company id in the vendor master in the "trading partner" field.
    But the vendor is not a cross company. My understanding is, we use the trading partner field in vendor master only if the vendor is an affiliated company.
    What could be the reason for the error and how can I resolve this ?
    Thanks
    Anil

    Hi Murali,
    Thanks for your reply.
    1. This is not an inter co postings. So I don't find any need to activate the same in doc type.
    2. The error is shown only when I remove trading partner from vendor master (vendor is not a cross company).
    3. Consolidation is required. But I have given the trading partner and group GL in all the GL accounts.
    So I am at a loss why this error occurs.
    Thanks
    Anil

  • F5080 error: Consolidated Companies & and & are different - HR

    Hi Experts
    We are trying to post the payroll and error F5080 comes up.  It refers to Trading partner and / or Intercompany posting which I have set  in the document type.  I have searched the net and OSS, but can't find a solution for HR.
    Can anyone please help?
    Kind regards
    Dawn

    Hi,
    For that Document Type, in control data- uncheck intercopany postings

  • Consolidated companies KGOI and ' ' are different

    Hi team,
    While clearing TDS Salary GL system showing below error
    Consolidated companies KGOI and ' ' are different
         Message no. F5080
    Diagnosis
         The number of the affiliated company must be clear for the selected
         document type for all line items. In this case at least two different
         companies or a company in connection with a business partner who does
         not belong to a company are stated.
    Procedure
         If you selected the correct accounts, you must enter the document with a
         document type that allows cross-company posting. Otherwise, please
         correct the entered account.
    Actually what we done..........
    1) In salary entry which was passed by HR payroll, we have distributed cost from company Code-2011 to another company code-5011.
    2) Manse some staff in 2011 cost booked in another company code 5011.
    3) in that way system passed automatic inter-company transaction, which is correct.
    5) but while doing clearing of inter company GLs & other accounts wherever these type of document selected then system throwing above error.
    Please guide use.

    Hi
    Yes you are correct, transports required through to production for this.
    The side affect of this I think is that if there are any documents (containing the document types that you have chnaged) posted while this chnage is in production, it would mean that those documents would be populated by the Partner Business Place (ie second company code) in their header record if they cross company codes. That would mean that they could then later be cleared from the second company code against the first. Also when changing the Intra Posting flag on the documnet type do an F1 Help on the filed and consider the SAPHelp on that topic.
    Overall I don't think this would be a big issue. But anyway if you transport this through at a period that is planned as low system activity this should ensure you don't post any docs while the chnage is in place and youy are doing the clearing.
    Regardss
    Michael

  • Consolidated companies 1000 and ' ' are different

    Can anyone tell me the how to solve this error "Consolidated companies 1000 and ' ' are different"  which I am getting in F-04
    Thanks,
    Madan

    Hi
    Yes you are correct, transports required through to production for this.
    The side affect of this I think is that if there are any documents (containing the document types that you have chnaged) posted while this chnage is in production, it would mean that those documents would be populated by the Partner Business Place (ie second company code) in their header record if they cross company codes. That would mean that they could then later be cleared from the second company code against the first. Also when changing the Intra Posting flag on the documnet type do an F1 Help on the filed and consider the SAPHelp on that topic.
    Overall I don't think this would be a big issue. But anyway if you transport this through at a period that is planned as low system activity this should ensure you don't post any docs while the chnage is in place and youy are doing the clearing.
    Regardss
    Michael

  • Consolidated companies 1000, 1500 are different

    hi ,
    when tried to do PGI(post goods issue) i am getting the below error
    "consolidated companies (1000, 1500) are different ".
    please suggest me .
    regards,
    deepa

    PGI is the point where FI entries related to goods getting delivered are genereated.
    Normally Finished Goods and Cost of Goods Sold GL of the same comapny are hit.
    I guess in the particular case Finished Goods GL of one company code and cost of goods sold of different company is getting hit.
    Thanks,
    Ashish

  • GRIR clearing: Different consolidation companies?

    Hi All,
    While trying to clear the GRIR account manually, I was trying to match two line items from one document to another document. They balance however, I'm not able to clear these as I get the following error:
    'Consolidated companies WE1LC and ' ' are different"
    I don't know Consolidation well, so it will be helpful if someone can tell me what to do and help me with how Consolidation is to be done.
    Thanks,
    Tejas

    Thanks Sridhar! It worked!

  • Error through F-44 that  Consolidated  companies 1000 and ' ' are different

    Dear Expert
    At the time of Vendor clearing through F-44 I get the
    warning message that "Withholding tax information ignored"
    where Withholding tax related customization and master has
    been updated accordingly. If I ignore the same warning
    and save the document as my all Debit and Credit transactions
    are of equal amount ,i m getting the error that "Consolidated
    companies 1000 and ' ' are different.
    What specific setting is required for the same.
    Thanks in advance
    VG

    Hi,
    If you are getting error F5 080 then most probably this is because one of the documents to be cleared contains a different trading partner (field BSEG-VBUND).
    Please check the contents of each customer/vendor line item concerning this field. The field can be viewed on the customer/vendor line item via button 'more data'. If the contents is different you have either to clear the items individually or you have to change the settings of the document type used for clearing.  You can find out what document type is used for clearing in OBXH in the 'transfer with postings section'.  Afterwards you can go to OBA7 and mark the flags 'Inter-company postings' and 'Enter trading partner'.
    I hope this helps.
    Regards
    Ravinagh Boni

  • F.13 clearing SAPMF05A 0700 E    F5  080 Consolidated companies UTCL and '

    Hi All
    I am getting the following error message while clearing customer transactions through F.13 and F-32
    SAPMF05A 0131 S    F5  074 2 items were selected
    SAPMF05A 0700 E    F5  080 Consolidated companies UTCL and ' ' are different
    anyone can help in this?
    rgds/Reddy
    Edited by: kpkreddy on Aug 30, 2010 1:55 PM

    Hi Reddy,
    Please check the document type used in OBXH and select UMBUCHNG check for document type assigned there defalut is AB
    ensure document type AB have Inter-company posting checked in OBA7
    Edited by: Ravi Rana on Aug 30, 2010 2:15 PM

  • Consolidated companies are different

    Hi,
    User is trying to make an invoice through MIRO, he is getting the error as consolidated companies are different. pls suggest.
    Regards,
    venki

    Hi,
    User is trying to make an invoice through MIRO, he is getting the error as "consolidated companies xxxx and " are different". pls suggest.
    Regards,
    venki

  • FI Documents not posted in consolidation

    Hi All,
    We have a issue where once the FI documents are posted, the consolidation documents are not created. I have checked customizing settings and realtime update is checked. We also dont receive any error message for realtime update.
    Also, when i run CXNR or CXNX to reconcile between general ledger and consolidation ledger, it shows there are reconciliation differences
    Any help would be appreciated.

    We had the same issue in our company as soon as we started fiscal year 2011.  I logged a ticket with SAP and they directed me to table TRWCA.  See Note 601700.
    In your system TRWA may look like this:
    400 ECCS 2010 X
    400 ECCS 2999
    400 ECCS 9999 X
    Use SM30 to add a tick beside 2999, and the documents will start posting to ECCS again.  Use CXNM to post the documents that were not posted to ECCS.
    Hope this helps.

  • How to catch Posting error in File to IDoc Scenario?

    I have successfully completed File to IDoc Scenario. Now I am interested in catching posting error. i.e., if mapping goes well and when IDoc is being sent to Recipient system then if any posting error is encountered, then a mail should go to a recipient.
    Can anybody suggest the solution.
    Regards,
    Suraj Kumar

    Hi Suraj,
    this can be done by triggerring an alert to the recipient.chk out these links to trigger a alert
    /people/sap.user72/blog/2005/01/14/alert-management--improving-monitoring-of-your-landscape
    /people/sap.user72/blog/2005/01/14/alert-management--improving-monitoring-of-your-landscape
    regards
    jithesh

  • GR/IR Posting Error CKMLGRIR025 - Purchase Order History Inconsistent

    Hi Everyone.
    We currently have a posting in our GRIR for a Feright Condition Value against a Purchase Order which gets the above error when trying to post in MR11.
    The Diagnosis of the error reads:
    "The purchase order history contains differences between the goods receipt and invoice receipts/Account maintenance for the order item in the field Difference Quantitiy (= 43.804 TO) and Difference Value (= -342.77)
    The purchase order history for this tiem is inconsistent"
    When looking at this Freight Condition information in the Purchase Order I can not see why this item has resulted in this error in MR11.
    Has anyone else seen this error come through in their system, and do you have any ideas on how to fix this.
    Thanks
    Hayley

    We are experiencing the same issue with the GRIR Posting Error CKMLGRIR025 - puchase order history inconsistent.  The actual message that we receive is Puchase Order history already inconsistent -->Quantity 1.00 EA Value 0.65-USD.
    We reviewed SAP Note 708649 which also recommends using transaction MIRO with the corresponding default quantity and value o.  However, we are not able to enter an Invoice for the "default qty & value 0", as SAP gives me error message M8278 "You are not allowed to have zero lines" (just like Haley commented).  In reviewing this thread, I did not find the solution to the error message M8278 "You are not allowed to have zero lines" .  Could someone help me understand?
    Thank you!

  • Fi posting error

    Hi SAP gurus,
                        I am facing posting error fi_tax_chk_pricing_data
                       error code 13 builder tax2.
                     plz help me

    hi
    u get this error when u have not specified the county while creating the company code go to  OX02 and give country for the company code. this solves your problem
    rgds
    sree

  • GL Posting effects consolidation

    Do FI posting effects consolidation right away if yes, how?

    Dear Saleema,
    Yes It is true that each and every postings affects the company code which is a consolidation unit in a consolidation. There is a seperate 'SEM-BCS' forum to learn more about this wonderful and most wanted module.
    Trust this helps much and answers to your query!
    Regards,
    Ashok SINGH

Maybe you are looking for

  • Any way to get prior (non-iOS 6) version of iMovie?

    Just saw a demo of iMovie and really liked it. I headed to the iTunes app store and was seriously disappointed to find that I could only use iMovie if I updated to iOS 6. That isn't going to happen. I use Google Maps every day and will switch to an A

  • Leaving date is not available in the Query report

    Hi, I had a problem that the leaving date is not generated while running a report from the sap standard report. Note: I has assigned the leaving action config as Coustomer Specific : 3 Employment: 0 Specific Payment: 0 Should we look into ADMIN LDATE

  • Problems swapping external displays

    I use my MacBookPro with two external displays (not simultaneously), with the MBP lid shut. I have an Apple 20" cinema dispay in the office and an Acer (can't remember the model) at home. When I take my MBP home and plug it into the Acer the MBP does

  • All of my downloaded Apps I have been using for over a year, none will open, they only flash when the icon is touched.

    All of my downloaded apps will not open, how do I correct this? The same thing happened a few days ago, but when I received an alert from the sport app, all the games opened up and I could use them. This morning they are all closed again. Everything

  • SRWC 2.2_13 Option not supported by Protocol

    Hi, First of all, I know what i'm trying to do is unsupported however my question remains. I'm trying to run the EA1 bits on my Vostro Laptop running Solaris Express Build 107. Installation of SRSS 4.2 EA1 runs just fine, aswell the installation of S