F.19 report showing wrong values (GR/IR)

Hello,
At my company, they run the MR11 to check for GR/IR variances and then clear these variances using the F.13 transaction. However, when the F.19 transaction is run to analyze the GR/IR clearing account, there are some old PO's belonging to year 2005/2006 that still show up in the report. When these PO's are checked, there is no GR/IR variance.
Could someone please explain the reason for this and if there is any way to remove these entries from the F.19 report?
Thanks in advance,
Rugmani.

Hi,
This is the wrong forum for this
Rgds,
Richard

Similar Messages

  • Report Painter report showing wrong values

    Hi,
    We have a report painter report Y_DN3_47000280 which is Inventory by Plant. We have a plant which is sold out and is not working anymore under the company. But the report is still showing postings and values in tune of 183000...Can you please advise what is wrong and what setting is missing?
    Thanks,
    Prithwi.

    Hi Dianne,
    Thanks for the details. We checked MBEW table. There's a mismatch of the values between MBEW and Y_DN3_47000280 report. MBEW contains $109.6 and the Y_DN3_47000280 report contains $180333.00 for the plant.
    Can you pls tell from where these values are populating. The plant has been closed 3 months back.
    Thanks,
    Prithwi.

  • HFM 11.1.1.3 ICP Report showing wrong value for Entity Currency Total

    Here is the situation.
    There are transactions on a ICP account (Entity Currency) 3.305.080
    A journal is posted to the same account with the same POV. 307.205
    When I run my ICP report on Entity currency i get the correct figure. 3.305.080
    When I rum my ICP report on Entity Currency Total I get a wrong figure 307.205 (Equalt Entity Currency Adjustment) where it should have been 3.612.285
    Any clues anybody?

    There is no limit. In reality there has not been a limit to the volume of data in a single subcube since paging was added in the 4.0 release. Certainly since 64 bit HFM was introduced there really is no limit to the amount of data in a subcube, or the database for that matter.
    Now that I've said that, 850,000 records in a single subcube is a lot of data. Prior to 4.0, the development team added an warning message when a subcube exceeded 100,000 records, but this was purely informational. You should still heed the notice. Most applications have a largest-cube size somewhere between 35,000 and 100,000 records (the top entity usually). While I've seen as many as a million records, you may experience performance problems at that point. Make sure you give the database and HFM app servers a lot of memory to handle this.
    Since HFM 11.1.2.2 with its configurable dimensions, data can be spread across many more intersections. In your example you have seven custom dimensions, so I can understand how you might have a normal amount of data in each base entity (a few hundred to maybe a couple thousand), but balloon to hundreds of thousands when you get to the top entity. HFM can process a lot of data very quickly, but be careful if you have rules that cycle through all those intersections, such as allocations or maybe cash flow by product.
    But there is no hard limit in HFM.

  • MC$4 report shows PO value in wrong currency

    MC$4 report shows PO value in wrong currency EUR (EURO) eventhough PO
    was created with SEK (swiss) currency. Report picks data from info
    table S012 that also reflects wrong currency.
    Please check attached example....
    Currency is getting picked up in table S012 info-structure from company
    code table T001 (PO belongs to) not from purchase order.
    This is certainly bug in standard SAP LIS report. This is inbuilt LIS feature given by SAP & we cannot do any fixing.
    Can you provide solution how we can correct this error. How to display correct currency in report & info-structure S012.

    hi
    in the report the system might be taking the co code currency
    what u have to do is go to  MC$4  press ctrl+F7
    u will get the currency change option change it to what u want
    regrads
    kunal
    awrad if helpful

  • "Invoice History Report "show wrong balance for supplier invoice with USD

    Invoice History Report show wrong balance for supplier invoice with USD Currency
    After I run this report i see in the last of this report there is difference between the supplier total
    USD (Currency ) and the open Balance USD , it is decreased the open balance
    for supplier with 2300 USD with out any reasons
    bellow is some data copy of the report
    ======================================================
    Supplier Site Total: SAR 34,700.00
    Supplier Site Total: USD 39,000.00
    Supplier Total: SAR 34,700.00
    Supplier Total: USD 39,000.00
    Open Balance: SAR 34,700.00
    Open Balance: USD 36,700.00
    *** End of Report ***
    ==============================================
    please advise me from where can this differenc ( 39000 - 36,700=2300 )COMMING
    or it is bug in this report , becuase i compare this report with other report in account payable like
    -supplier open balance letter
    -invoice register report
    -invoice aging report
    all this report give me the amount for supplier USD =39000
    BUT AGIN FROM WHERE THE SYSTEM DECREASED THE AMOUNT TO 36,700
    thanks

    Can you try running Create Accounting For payments just before you run the Invoice History Report and re-check .
    Thanks

  • Issue: - FBL1N - is showing wrong values

    Issue: - FBL1N - is showing wrong values    
    Hi SAP experts,
    We are executing T Code FBL1N and selecting all open enteries, and select all items like special normal items, G/L Transaction, noted items, parked items and customer items, we found that the balance is showing wrong for intercompany vendors.
    For Ex, if vendor is not created in company Code A and customer items are available in Company Code A then that items are coming for some line items and for some line items it is not?
    I have attached one example for the same. for all vendors data is coming properly but for indivisual vendor is it not.
    Please suggest why?
    Regards,
    Vijay

    Example :
    Vendor number 99 ans for the same  customer nO is C12 is created in company code ABC but vendor is not created and customer C12 is in PQR, now i am executing fbl1n for Company Code PQR for open item selecting all options like normal items, special G/L transaction, customer items  noted items and parked items, the line items related to Vendor number 99 for company Code PQR should not display, as vendor is not created but customer items are there, please let me know for some cases it is showing result and in same cases it is not why?
    Regards,
    Vijay

  • Standard program showing wrong values in ALV report

    Hi All,
    Standard Report 'RFBILA00' (Balance sheet P+L Statement) ,when i excute for classical list the output showing correct.
    But with the same test data when i run for ALV Grid control showing wrong valuse like.
    with same company code comparision year,comparision period ,comp periods...when i run classical list:
    PROFIT/LOSS BEFORE TAXATION                                 5,194,871.12-
    RETAINED PROFIT/LOSS FOR THE PERIOD                    5,194,871.12-
    NET PROFIT/(LOSS)                                                        5,194,871.12.
    when i run in ALV for same above data, the result is:
    PROFIT/LOSS BEFORE TAXATION                           9,307,137.09
    RETAINED PROFIT/LOSS FOR THE PERIOD              5,194,871.12-
    NET PROFIT/(LOSS)                                                 22,076,715.82.
    Please help on this....and this is standard report.. y its showing different for same data.
    Thank you
    Anu.

    Hi ,
    Same program  excuted once by selecting classical list is showing correct. And with same data excuted with ALV grid list showing wrong valuse.
    when selected with Classical list: for company code:8000,Reporting periods: 1-9,Reporting year:2009,Comparison periods:1-8
    Comparison year-2009.
    PROFIT/LOSS BEFORE TAXATION 5,194,871.12-
    RETAINED PROFIT/LOSS FOR THE PERIOD 5,194,871.12-
    NET PROFIT/(LOSS) 5,194,871.12.
    when i run in ALV for same above data, the result is: for company code:8000,Reporting periods: 1-9,Reporting year:2009,Comparison periods:1-8 Comparison year-2009.
    PROFIT/LOSS BEFORE TAXATION 9,307,137.09
    RETAINED PROFIT/LOSS FOR THE PERIOD 5,194,871.12-
    NET PROFIT/(LOSS) 22,076,715.82.
    Thank You,
    Anu.

  • Updated CODE1 is showing wrong values in 2LIS_05_QE1

    Hi all,
    I'm using 2LIS_05_QE1 extractor to report over qualitative data in BW. When the code of the characteristics is updated, the extractor takes 2 records, before and after images. The extractor is gathering wrong values for the CODE1 field  in the before image.
    REQUEST     DATAPAKID     RECORD     ROCANCEL     PPLNKN     MERKNR     CODE1     GRUPPE1     ZHLNSTAT
    REQU_4KVR0APSV0RSZ7N70IOR0F95L     1     5120          5     40     0     CIBAU038     1
    REQU_4KPIA4UG5G1IKN6DE3XFWKIS9             3     4045     X     5     40     0     CIBAU038     -1
    REQU_4KPIA4UG5G1IKN6DE3XFWKIS9             3     4046          5     40     75     CIBAU038     1
    REQU_4KYF8YNIEMXNZI7P2Y5BM21W9     3     4045     X     5     40     0     CIBAU038     -1
    REQU_4KYF8YNIEMXNZI7P2Y5BM21W9     3     4046          5     40     75     CIBAU038     1
    We have changed the characteristic two times, now we can see two of the before images with the ROCANCEL field marked with = 'X'. The problem appears in the second before image which is not taking the actual value of the CODE1 field (75), instead is showing the value in zero. Then, when I report over the key figure in the table above ZHLNSTAT (quantity of values) the results are showing 2 values for CODE1=75 and -1 values for CODE1=0.
    Any ideas?

    I have checked Datasource and CODE1 is not a hidden field...apart from this field there are other fields too which I can see in Datasource in R/3 about dont see them in BW ....
    Please let me know what could be wrong.
    Thanks,
    Murtuza.
    Edited by: Murtuza Morwala on Jun 27, 2009 7:36 AM

  • Color picker on Illustrator CC 2014 shows wrong values

    See the image above . The selected area filled color is e6e6e6 ( 230, 230, 230 ) but the color picker shows the wrong value 4d4d4d. Its happens only on Illustrator , What is this actually is there any problem with the color mode settings ? Please help me 

    You misunderstand me, so don’t be too quick to judge.
    I said that the Color panel was more efficient than the Color Picker. It has sliders so that you can adjust colours precisely as you wish first time, rather than just groping somewhere on a big area of colour in the Picker and then having to make fine numerical adjustments afterwards (plus an OK when you’re done).
    The Color panel is particularly useful when you are working in CMYK because it ensures that you get clean mixtures when you want them (which the Picker does not, without fine tweaking afterwards).
    And if you want to get shades of the same colour, you simply hold down Shift as you drag one of the sliders.
    In conjunction with the Swatches panel, I would go for the Color panel any time, but if you prefer the Picker that’s quite all right by me.

  • DSO Analysis Report : Show wrong period

    I have created the new Variant for DSO Selection Programme RFDRRE05 to get the DSO for Credit Representative Group for closed period (i.e. now Period one is going, it should consider period value as 12). For this we created and assigned a Variable to be updated from TVARV table.
    Surprisingly, when I look a the Variable assigned to the Variant for DSO Selection Programme RFDRRE05, I can see the period value as 12 but when I see the selection Log in DSO Report (T Code F.30) it shows period value as 10.
    The report is picking up the variant from INDX table as mentioned below,
    IMPORT GENR_LDBPG
           GENR_RRSEL
           GENR_RREXX
           SOPT_RRSEL
           SOPT_RRSEL_DYN
           SOPT_RREXX
    FROM DATABASE RFRR(RR) ID RRCATKY.
    IF SY-SUBRC NE 0.
      MESSAGE A517.
    ENDIF.
    Please let me know which program is updating this INDX table.
    I would highly appriciate your quick response.
    Best regards,
    Sanjeev Jain

    Dear Ajay,
    I've checked  the configuration by following details;
    1. Period control setting in AFAMP :  002
        - Period control: Acquisition : 01 (Pro rata at period start date)
        - Period control: Acquisition in the following year : 01 (Pro rata at period start date)
        - Period control: Retirement : 02 (Pro rata upto mid-period at period start date)
        - Period control : Transfer : 02 (Pro rata upto mid-period at period start date)
    2. Period control setting in OAVH
       - FV: K4, Period Control : 01 -> Month : 0, Day 0
       - FV: K4, Period Control : 02 -> Month : 1, Day 15
    3. Changeover method : 05 (Changeover after end of the useful life)
    The problem occurred for some asset that acquisition on last year.
    Could you please help me to investigate and solve this problem?
    Thank you for your suggestion.
    VirgoGirl
    Edited by: virgogirl on Mar 7, 2011 4:39 AM

  • After casting double to float debugger shows wrong value

    Hi,
    My colleaque found an interesting behaviour with Java debugger. I have made some tests and here are the results:
    Test code:
    double dNum = 43.680659;
    float fNum = (float) dNum;
    System.out.println("double number = " + dNum);
    System.out.println("float number = " + fNum);This is tested in Eclipse IDE 3.4.2 with following Java JRE versions:
    - 1.4.2_19
    - 1.5.0_14
    - 1.6.0_10
    And following JDK:
    - jdk1.5.0_16
    Eclipse IDE will show following values for variables in all platforms:
    dNum = 43.680659
    fNum = 43.74316Console will print:
    double number = 43.680659
    float number = 43.68066Testing also with command line debugger jdb. Java JRE version:
    - 1.4.2_19
    And following JDK:
    - jdk1.5.0_16
    Results are the same as in Eclipse IDE. Is there a bug in debugger environment?

    I managed to find bug report of this issue:
    http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6807341
    Information:
    Bug ID : 6807341
    Synopsis : JDWP: float value reported incorrectly
    Category : java:debugger
    State : 3-Accepted, bug
    Priority : 4-Low
    Submit Date: 19-FEB-2009

  • Saptranshost profile parameter showing wrong value

    Hi Expert,
    We are using EHP6 with sybase database on windows platform
    We get stuck while configuring stms.
    After working more on same issue we found that "DIR_TRANS" parameter showing wrong path in AL11 tx.
    "DIR_TRANS = \stats\sapmnt\trans"
    The correct value should "DIR_TRANS = \sapprd\sapmnt\trans"
    (Wrong host name showing in path as "stats" where it should be "sapprd" )
    After changing the value in profile parameter "SAPTRANSHOST" from RZ10 tx as "SAPPRD" issue get resolved.
    When I checked profile parameter "SAPTRANSHOST" from RZ10 in production system, its showing me following value:
    >>Unsubstituted standard value: STATS
    >>Substituted standard value: STATS
    Same I checked in Development system and showing as below:
    >>Unsubstituted standard value: $(SAPGLOBALHOST)
    >>Substituted standard value: SAPDEV
    My question is why "SAPTRANSHOST" profile parameter showing "Unsubstitued standard value" as "STATS" where is should be "$(SAPGLOBALHOST)"
    Sap not allowed to change the same. Only allowed "Parameter Val" in RZ10 tx.
    How to change "stats" as "$(SAPGLOBALHOST)" and what can be possible reason as value showing stats.
    Regards.
    Dev

    HI

  • Report showing wrong data

    Hi Gurus,
    When we are generating report in the answers in one column it is showing wrong data from where i have to start for this issue.
    Thanks,
    Rafi

    Pull that column alone,run report, compare the results with your manual query, and also compare the physical query.
    if all are good then try to add other column from any other dim and then do the same as above
    repeat till you know the cause.
    Pls mark if helps

  • Snapshot report showing wrong instance on grid control!!!

    Hi
    On one of the cluster environments, Even though I run snapshot report on instance 2, report shows instance 1. This i happening on one set of cluster environment. Other cluster instances are working fine.
    Let me know if you have seen such behavior and fix...
    Thanks,

    It does not matter how many instances you have running in a RAC cluster ... you have one and only one database.
    Define your use of the term "snapshot." We have no idea to what you are referring.

  • TO_Number Function showing wrong values

    Hi All,
              I am passing a Char value from oracle forms to oracle reports as parameter.
    In Report Query I'm converting the char value into number for comparison using TO_NUMBER() function. As the char value is large value like '001002004006004' it is converting to something like 1.2e+12 and my query results goes wrong. I want value, something like 1002004006004( as initial 00 will be removed).
    I'm using Oracle forms 10g and Reports 10g
    Can anyone please help me.
    Thanks
    Sandeep
    ----Don't think outside the box, Think as if there is no Box at all.

    Hi, Sandeep,
    Whenever you have a problem, post a little sample data (CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements) that shows what the problem is, and the correct results you want from that sample data.  Explain how you get those results from that data.
    See the forum FAQ: https://forums.oracle.com/message/9362002#9362002
    Don't confuse how a number is displayed with what that number is.  SQL*Plus (and other front ends), by default, allows only 10 character spaces for displaying NUMBERs.  If you have a NUMBER that doesn't fit into 10 spaces, then SQL*Plus will round the digits after the decimal point.  If it still doesn't fit (which is the case with 1002004006004) then SQL*Plus will use scientific notation, rounding the decimal places.  The actual value (at least 38 significant digits) will be used in all computations, regardless of how the NUMBER is displayed.  I doubt if what you posted has anything to do with the real problem.

Maybe you are looking for