F-47 request should be approved by higher authority for lesser amt than ask

F-47 request should be approved by higher authority for lesser amt than asked for only then down payment should be made.
they want a list of down payment request which can be edited approved or disapproved by higher authorities The payment clerk should make payment only for the amt that is approved.
can it be done in sap without credit management
warm regards
Manjunath

Ah, I've just re-read my BT bill and it does indeed say BT Infinity Option 2 !
I took that to mean BT Infinity 2, but maybe it means BT Infinity 1 Option 2 (which gives unlimited usage).
Viewing my account online, it also says "Up to 76Mb download speed" and "Up to 19Mb upload speed", so I think I'm on Infinity 2 but with my IP profile still stuck at the same 38.72 that I was originally given.
Anyway, to re-phrase my dilemma......
Since I'm consistently hitting the IP Profile ceiling, I feel that my line MIGHT be capable of running faster if it were allowed.
What I don't want to do is apply for the no-cost "up to 76" option, and the discover that the line is not so stable.
When I originally signed up, I was told to expect about 26 down speed, so BT obviously thought that my line would not be good enough for 38 even.
I suppose I'm really asking if anyone has gone from 38 to 76, and regretted it because they then got a less stable line, variable speeds, or even consistently lower speeds (or maybe for any ther reasons).
Or, maybe I'm supposed to be getting a faster speed, but just have a "stuck Ip Profile" ?

Similar Messages

1) When call center Team creates Service Request/Service Order/ Complaints it should be set as High Priority by default.

Hello team ,this is my requirement .. Through customizing..
When call center Team creates Service Request/Service Order/ 　Complaints it should be set as High Priority by default...we need to set only interaction agent bussiness role priority only HIGH..only for this bussiness role.through customizing how to do it..what are the steps..through customizing only please.. help

By customizing, you can set a default priority to a given transaction type.
But this does not depend on the business role.
But as you are talking about IC agents, maybe you can check IDI for this purpose, because there are actions like "Set Problem Priority", "Set Service Request Priority" or "Set Service Order Priority".
Best regards,
Sylvain AGUETTAZ

Self user registration request fails during Approval.

Hi,
My case is explained below.
I have created a new user using "New User Registration" in the sign in page.
Now the user is created in OID.
I logged into identity manager using "xelsysadm" user.
I clicked "Track Requests" and search, I could see the new request with status "Pending request approval"
I clicked on "Pending Approvals", selected the request and click on "Approve"
I get a success message. However the user is not getting created in OIM.
Here the user is getting deleted from OID also.
I could not find any forum page discussing this issue. Anyone good in 11gr2 kindly help.
I get the following error in the logs.
[2013-01-31T16:51:17.884+05:30] [oim_server1] [WARNING] [] [oracle.iam.request.impl] [tid: [ACTIVE].ExecuteThread: '14' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'] [userId: weblogic] [ecid: e171ff3c1743d36a:75a03544:13c9008be1d:-8000-0000000000000642,1:27414:13] [WEBSERVICE_PORT.name: CallbackServicePort] [APP: oim#11.1.2.0.0] [J2EE_MODULE.name: workflowservice] [WEBSERVICE.name: CallbackService] [J2EE_APP.name: oim_11.1.2.0.0] Exception :[[
oracle.iam.request.exception.RequestServiceException: An error occurred while completing approval process instance 8d7d6216-fcbe-48b1-90a5-dce34b3b8492. The corresponding error message is Index: 0, Size: 0.
     at oracle.iam.request.impl.ApprovalManager.approvalInstanceComplete(ApprovalManager.java:255)
     at oracle.iam.request.impl.ApprovalPolicyServiceImpl.updateApprovalResult(ApprovalPolicyServiceImpl.java:52)
     at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
     at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
     at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
     at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
     at org.springframework.aop.support.AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection(AopUtils.java:307)
     at org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.invokeJoinpoint(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:182)
     at org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:149)
     at oracle.iam.platform.utils.DMSMethodInterceptor.invoke(DMSMethodInterceptor.java:25)
     at org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:171)
     at org.springframework.aop.framework.JdkDynamicAopProxy.invoke(JdkDynamicAopProxy.java:204)
     at $Proxy811.updateApprovalResult(Unknown Source)
     at oracle.iam.request.api.ApprovalPolicyServiceEJB.updateApprovalResultx(Unknown Source)
     at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)

Okay, here are the detailed steps to update it.
Click on track requests and search or your request
Click on your request number then it will open request details form.
This form will have two tabs request details and approval details.
Click on approval details tab.
Click on row#1.
As soon as you click on row #1, it will show you a history down to that row # 1 details. Here you will see sequestnce #, stage1, participant name, participant action etc.
Click on participant name for ex. xelsysadm.
As soon as you click on xelsysadm, view snapshot button will be enabled.
Click on view snapshot button.
Now, it will will show you a detailed request details form which will have two tabs request details and approval details.
Click on request details tab. Here you can update organization name. and you will see update button as well. Click on update button after updating org name.
Now, go to pending approvals and approve your request.

Leave Request two layer approval

Dear Experts,
I'm trying to implement two layer approval leave request workflow by copying and modifying standard workflow WS12300111.
I follow the guide from this link:
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPHCM/CustomizingtheESSLeaveApprovalusingBusiness+Workflow
My workflow step is as follow:
1. first approver has approve the request
2. reset req object status to SENT
3. set next approver using method if_pt_req_request->set_next_processor
4. send the request to the second approver
I have implement badi PT_GEN_REQ to set first approver (method IF_EX_PT_GEN_REQ~FIND_RESP_AND_DEFAULT_NEXT_PRC) so that the first approver name shown correctly when requestor create the request.
Now there are 3 problems I'm facing:
1. After the FIRST approver approve the request, the note he input is shown twice. I found out this is because the status change create new version of the document. I have tried to clear this note when changing the status using method if_pt_req_request->set_notice. However, the method ignore if the notice is set to blank. Is there anyway to hadle this?
2. When SECOND approver reject the request, I want the request to be revised by the requestor, and then forwared to FIRST approver after that. For this purpose, before send the workitem to requestor back, I put step to set approver back to FIRST approver again using method if_pt_req_request->set_next_processor. But it seems this doesn't work and the request is sent to SECOND approver after revised. The supervisor name that is shown when requestor revise the request also show the SECOND approver name instead the FIRST approver.
3. I find difficulties to create email notification if the request is changed by the requestor during approval process, since there are no event triggered. Is there anyway to trigger this event or is there any workaround?
Thank you.
Regards,
Ponty

Hi Ponty,
I am trying to implement two layer approval for leave request, too.
I took a copy of standard WS12300111 as you did.
I followed the guide, you mentioned. For one level approval this works nearly out of the box.
But I don't understand the second half of the guide.
For me it will be the first time to implement a BAdI. I never did this before.
Can you please explain me, how to do it and how you enhanced the workflow for two layer approval?
Some screenshots might be useful. Eventually you can enhance the guide you mentioned.
Regarding the numerous questions on multi level approval, these hints might be useful for a large number of users.
I would be very happy, If somebody can help me, becaus I didn't know any workflow experts who can help me implementing the BAdI.
Thank you.

SOAP RECEIVER and WSDL-what specifies how my SOAP REQUEST should look like?

Hi
I am sending a request to a webservice (SOAP RECEIVER) but the webservice in question does not have a wsdl. I have created my own wsdl based on another example but when mapping to the REQUEST part of this and routing it through my SOAP RECEIVER channel it appears that it has NO SOAP-ENV only the pure XML in the request sent to the webservice.
I have UNTICKED the "No SOAP envelope.." so all is pretty basic.
What specifies how the REQUEST sent to the webservice through the SOAP RECEIVER comm channel should look like?
I thought that the SOAP RECEIVER ADAPTER did this automatically, but in my scenariao, it looks as if it something else as well? Is it the XSD or WSDL that dictates how the SOAP REQUEST should look like?
Cheers

> I thought that the SOAP RECEIVER ADAPTER did this automatically, but in my scenariao, it looks as if it something else as well? Is it the XSD or WSDL that dictates how the SOAP REQUEST should look like?
No. The SOAP adapter adds the SOAP enveloped, no matter how the WSDL looks like.
I have no idea why this does not work for you. Check whether the channel is active and the cache is refreshed.
Regards
Stefan

Why should I pay 90% higher ( US$ 94,99/mo x US$ 49,99/mo) to annual subscription in Brazil?

Why should I pay 90% higher ( US$ 94,99/mo x US$ 49,99/mo) to annual subscription in Brazil? I am releasing a web dev. biz. so please help.
We understand a price plus due adobe brazil technical marketing and products support but 90% higher? As you know we also have exchange rate problems so please help us offering a better price.

Hi SILVEIRA,
The explaination I have regarding the price difference is this
Adobe decides the price at which it sells its product on the Adobe Store. A number of factors influence our regional pricing including local market conditions and the cost of doing business in that region. Please note that resellers are free to decide at which price they sell Adobe products, which can be less than the price on the Adobe Store.
We establish our prices for Creative Suite products in U.S. dollars, Euros, Yen, British Pound and Australian dollars on a regional basis using a consistent methodology. Local market conditions significantly influence our pricing – these include the costs of doing business in different regions and customer research that assesses the value of the product in the local market.
We conduct the majority of our business through our retail and licensing channels. We depend on our retail partners in local markets to help us reach as many customers as possible, support those customers, and much more.
As stated, the cost of doing business in the rest of the world is higher than in North America. That higher cost is reflected in some of our pricing and would remain no matter how customers chose to purchase. For example, customers will still read about our products through local press to whom we reach out; they will meet local Adobe sales people who conduct seminars, participate in user groups, and visit large customers; and they will rely on support resources that Adobe makes available in these markets. All of these efforts impact the business costs of securing the sale, whether that sale is delivered online or in a box.
-Dave

Error: "Selected request was already approved/rejected"

Hello,
Recently we have upgraded the system from EHP4 to EHP7. We are using Webdynpro ABAP leave application (standard workflow). Here, at approval level, on opening any leave request item, an error "Selected request was already approved/rejected" appears. We found SAP Note 1773641 and followed the suggested steps. But the error still exists. Please suggest.
Secondly, it is observed that if there are more than one leave request in approver's UWL, then by default the record with highest date is opened (ie. out of leave requests of 01.07.2014, 07.08.2014, 29.08.2014, every time leave record of 29.08.2014 is displayed even though any other item is selected). Is it a standard behavior or requires some settings?
Regards,

as UR IN ehp 7 here u cnan use POWL other than UWL ...it wud better ....what is the workflow ur using for leaves here in task ur in SWFVISU ... what are the parameters assigned to hat task in SWFVISU
No it is not standard behaviour, go to ptarq and check in display documents what is the status of that 29.08.2014 leave type and if it approved and is updated in 20001 go to ptarq and click on delete documents and delete that already approved leave from that
SE38 :- RPTARQDBDEL----
RPTARQDBVIEW .......DISPLAY LEAVE REQUESTS
Approve Leave Request - Business Package for MSS Add-On 1.0 - SAP Library
Let's Crowd Source a POWL Based Universal Worklist Design for ERP

Transport Request should be created when data in table gets saved

Dear All,
I have a requirement that I have a cross client table. When in a particular client say 800 the data gets saved then a transport request should be generated so that the data can be transported to other client. Can you please help me out how this can be done. I have created a table maintenance generator and there I have considered STANDARD RECORDING ROUTINE as recording routine. It is asking for workbench request.
Please can you help me out?
Thanks and regards,
Atanu
Edited by: Atanu Dey on Jan 24, 2008 5:48 PM

Hi,
you have to create a table(ZTEST) without the field 'MANDT'(Client). So that that table is client specific, so you save the data in the table(ZTEST), it will ask TR.
i hope it may be useful.
Regards,
Boobalan. S

CUP: Change request fields while Approval Step

Hello all,
We are using GRC AC 5.3 and want to allow approver to change some request attribute while approving request. E.g. Email, Employee personal number, ...
Does CUP allow to do this and where could it be configured?
Thanks,
Anton.

Hi,
As Ankur mentioned, you can not change any filed values once request enters in that particular stage.
For example, once request enters Manager stage, you can not go back and change parameters in manager stage so that manager can make changes to the request.
Regards,
Alpesh

Should I Get the High Resolution 17" MBP Screen

We have one designer in our firm who is a staunch PC person, but being that everyone has switched to a Mac at this point we've convinced her to try a Mac. I'm going to get her a 17" MacBook Pro, but my question is whether I should get her the higher resolution screen that is available for a few hundred dollars more. The money isn't an issue, I'm just wondering it that is cramming too many pixels in too small of a space to be usable over a regular pair of eyeballs. She does mostly web design work in DreamWeaver and related programs.

Well I am certainly very happy with my high resolution display, and I don't remember it costing that much more. I have heard people complain that they can't read mail or Safari, but it is easy enough to set large fonts in these applications to make them easier to use. And I would think that one would want the high resolution for web design and dreamweaver, although I have never done this myself. Having rather bad eyes myself, I generally wear reading glasses for long computer sessions. But I haven't really had any problems with the high resolution. I believe you can set it for a lower resolution if you like, but I really enjoy the sharpness. And if she ever uses a large external display, the high resolution will be better for that.
Elsewhere on this forum is a very lively "Matte vs. Glossy" thread you might like to look at. There's a wide variety of opinion as to which is better for the graphic artist.
Good luck!

Hello. I began with the DPS. Is it possible to publish a magazine for a limited, specific target group? For example, in one department of a large company? Or to the responsible for various services? If so, how should I do? Thank you for your help.

Hello.
I began with the DPS. Is it possible to publish a magazine for a limited, specific target group? For example, in one department of a large company?
Or to the responsible for various services? If so, how should I do? Thank you for your help.

Short answer is yes.
Click the request for consultation link in Digital Publishing Suite Help | DPS pricing options to receive a price estimate for the DPS license your project.

Workflow for approval of down payment for outward freight

Can somebody suggest if is there any standard workflow available or not for approval of down payment for outward freight in SAP system? I want to build a workflow for this purpose upto two level of approval.
Thanks & Regards,
Manas

Hi Manas,
There is business object BSEG for down payment request. Try to use that and u can find workflow as Arghadip said in other thread. In PFTC u can go for F4 and search.

You should run a new contract selection for item 0000000010

Hello Friends
i am trying to create a service request from WEB IC by confirming Account and Ibase and able to create without error.
if i end session and open the service request in change mode and if delete the ibase and save, then appeas the below message
"You should run a new contract selection for item 0000000010", going through OSS notes, but found nothing.
Transaction type ZXXX : we set
Contract Determination is set to 'E' : Assign at Item leve : Assign immediately if unique for .
if i open the service ticket in CRMD_ORDER and go in change mode if i click process action button next to error, this will disappear. but it comes when i assing a ibase to the request, so its working only when i first create without errors.
users do not use crmd_order to process error and WEB CI does not have process action feature.
any sort of help will be appreciated.
Thanks
Gopi

Hi Gopi,
Which release are you using ?
This message appears when you change any field in the service ticket which has an influence on contract determination, such as ibase, ibase component, line item, ...
As of CRM2007 we have enabled a hyperlink for this message. Clicking the hyperlink will re-execute the contract selection.
Regards
Gert

Approval process not waiting for approval tasks to be completed

Hi All,
I created an Approval process for a resource. When a request is created for this resource an approval task is assigned to the manager of the user.
Before the approval task is completed by the manager the resource is getting provisioned. Is there something I am missing out here. Any suggestions about what I am missing here.
Thanks

The statuses shown are sometimes misleeding. There is a status for when the approval starts. There is a status when the Standard Approval process completes (this is normally set to auto complete). There there is a status for when the object specific approval starts, a status for if any of the approvals have been completed, and then one for when the whole request is completed. These don't neccessarily provide you with a sure answer to the status of the request.
I think you need to disregard the statuses for now, and just configure the approval tasks as you intend to do so. If you do not want the standard approval to be required, set the Approve task to use the auto complete adapter. Then create an approval process specific to your resource object, and set it to the default. Then create an approval task and make to uncheck the "conditional" checkbox so that it always runs. Set your assignments appropriately, and you will be done. The provisioning will not start until all tasks are completed with a complete status for the tasks within.
If you want to know the statuses between steps, then check those between all of the steps.
-Kevin

Request for DataSource from Souce System has a lesser SID than the request

Hi Experts,
Request REQU_48Q572FT5LVYNE8BD4KOD5WTV(72.714) has not or not correctly been updated; Please edit
Message no. RSM096
Diagnosis
Request REQU_48Q572FT5LVYNE8BD4KOD5WTV (72.714) for DataSource 2LIS_13_VDKON from source system EP1CLNT410 has the status green and a lesser SID (and is therefore older) than the request that you currently want to update into the DataStore object.
This is not possible because the sequence of requests has to be followed.
Delta- and init requests have to be updated to the DataStore object in the request sequence.
Procedure
First update request REQU_48Q572FT5LVYNE8BD4KOD5WTV(72.714) for DataSource 2LIS_13_VDKON from source system EP1CLNT410 from the PSA into the DataStore object.
You can also set request REQU_48Q572FT5LVYNE8BD4KOD5WTV(&V2) to 'RED' in the monitor if this data is not required in the DataStore object. The request is then ignored during the check for completeness.
Request REQU_48Q572FT5LVYNE8BD4KOD5WTV (72.714 ) for DataSource
2LIS_13_VDKON from source system EP1CLNT410 has the status green and a
lesser SID (and is therefore older) than the request that you currently
want to update into the DataStore object.
This is not possible because the sequence of requests has to be
followed.
Delta- and init requests have to be updated to the DataStore object in
the request sequence.
First update request REQU_48Q572FT5LVYNE8BD4KOD5WTV (72.714 ) for
DataSource 2LIS_13_VDKON from source system EP1CLNT410 from the PSA into
the DataStore object.
You can also set request REQU_48Q572FT5LVYNE8BD4KOD5WTV (72.714 ) to
'RED' in the monitor if this data is not required in the DataStore
object. The request is then ignored during the check for completeness.
The error is triggered in the process chain, the request is already green, how do i resolve this, i already tried RSRQ is showed the request green, do you have any more idea to resolve this?
Thank you in advance.

Hi Ver Baylon,
After having deleted the request in the manage ODS you should run DTP not the info package again. Better yet I think you should do the following steps.
1. Double click on the corresponding info package. Then go to scheduler on the top left tab of the window and click on the initialization options for source system. There delete all the queues that exist.
2. Manage the PSA and delete all the requests
3. Delete form manage the DSO all the requests from the DSO.
Then go to the info package in the update tab and do a Initialize without data transfer
In the next step do a delta update.
After that execute a full DTP.
Check the results then
Hope that helps
John

F-47 request should be approved by higher authority for lesser amt than ask

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for