F-90 TAX (Posting is only possible with a zero balance;correct document )
WHEN I AM POSITNG THE DOCUMENT THROUGH F-90 I AM GETTING THE FOLLOWING ERROR
ERROR:Posting is only possible with a zero balance; correct document
Message no. F5060
ACTUALY I HAVE SLECTED VENDOR 31 ASSET 70 WITH TAX CODE AFTER SIMULATING THE DOCUMENT
THE FOLLOWING ENTYR IS COMING BUT WITH GREEN ERROR AS I HAVE MENTIONED ABOVE
ENTRY VIEW AFTER SIMULATING IS AS FOLLOWS
PK BusA Acct INR Amount Tax amnt
001 31 0000700000 One time Vendor for 75,000.00-
002 70 0020001031 000040010498 0000 75,000.00 H1
Other line items 3,000.00
D 75,000.00 C 75,000.00 3,000.00 * 2 Line items
ACTUALLY I HAV SEELECTED CALCULATE TAXES ON NET AMOUNT IN FB00.AT THE TIME ENTRY IS POSTING AS FOLLOWS
31 VENDOR 75000
70 ASSET 72200
40 VAT 2800
BUT THE ABOVE ERNTRY IS WRONG
CORRECT ENTRY IS AS FOLLOWS
31 VENDOR 78000
70 ASSET 75000
40 VAT 3000
ACTUALY CALCUCULATION IS ON NET AMOUNTS.IS I DESELECT IN FB00 PROBLEM WIL SOLVE AND REFLECTING WITH GROSS AMOUNTS IN ASSET
BUT TAX IS NOT CALULATING IN CUSTOMER INVOICE
Regards
sumathi
Edited by: sumathi lakshmi on Jan 9, 2009 8:24 AM
I HAVE BEEN TRYING THE SAME CAN ANYONE HELP AS I AM NEW TO THIS SYSTEM?
F5060
Posting is only possible with a zero balance; correct document?
I HAVE BEEN TRYING BOTH VENDAR AND CUSTOMER WITH INPUT TAX AND OUTPUT TAX BOTH ARE SAME ERROR. IS THERE ANYTHING IN SETTINGS I NEED TO RECTIFY?
Similar Messages
-
Posting is only possible with a zero balance; correct document
Hello SAP gurus,
Please help me here. I tried to post a vendor invoice but i got an error message "Posting is only possible with a zero balance; correct document".
The debit and credit balance is correct. In document entry i checked calculate tax and the GL master was assigned a tax code. How can i correct the document and be able to post the invoice?
Thanks in advance,
PrakashHi,
I had also faced same issue and got it resolved.
For resolving it, I made necessary changes in Editing Options in transaction FB01.
These Editing options are user specific settings and these can be found in transaction FB01 -
Go to Settings --> Editing Options (F9).
Alternatively, you can click Editing Option Button on FB01 Screen (Call Up Editing options for Accounting).
Please check if it resolves your issue.
Best Regards,
Rajinder Sharma -
Posting is only possible with a zero balance; correct document Message no. F5060
Hope all are doing well
In FB60 Need to deduct VAT TDS on canteen expenses it should not come through direct tax
Dear Experts
Our client requirement is deduct VAT TDS On canteen expenses i created new tax code and given - (minus) in FV11 For condition type JVRD I tried to post in FB60 But VAT TDS Is not calculating correct and withholding tax amount also not updating.
SAP Entry in FB60
31 Vendor 1000 Cr
40 Canteen Expenses 958.33 Dr
50 VAT Deducted at source 41.67 Cr
Client requirement is
Check the following entry :
If bill value : Rs. 1000 /-
The entry would be:
Canteen expenses 1000 (Dr)
To Vendor 950 ( Cr)
To VAT TDS 40 (Cr)
To IT TDS 10 (Cr)
Thanks & Regards
Srinivasa Reddy MHi Kumar,
Actually in FB60, We have to enter vendor bill amount, rest will be calculated by system, lets say vendor bill is 14 EUR, and select the appropriate tax code 10%, then system will automatically calculates the tax entry, and your vendor credit amount is exactly same as on the bill. please see below example:
Vendor Invoice is 14 EUR
TAX rate is 10%
Entry will be:
DR Expense Account 12.73
DR Tax 1.27 (automatically calculated by system.
Credit Vendor 14 (as per invoice)
Therefore, in enjoyable transactions FB60, you only have to enter vendor bill amount, select the tax code, give the Exp. GL account, and simulate the entry, you will see result, will be as per your requirement. -
Back posting only possible with same valuation class
Hii, I made changes in valuation class before that i closed all the open po and maintained stock zero using 201 mvt type on 31st March. Now the system is throwing error when Im doing the reversal using MB1A 202 mvt type like "Back posting only possible with same valuation class". But its taking if I take the Posting date to 1st April, and we want to post on the 31st MArch. Please provide the suggestion.
Thanks,
ManojSystem is behaving correctly..
Suppose you have changed the valuation class from X to Y as on 31.03.2014.
So your valuation class was X as on 31.03.2014.
But now your valuation class is changed as Y. and system will always try to post the valuation class Y for material.
So when you are trying to reverse the entry on 31.03.2014, system shows the error..
In that case, you should change the valuation class as on 30.03.2014 and you should do 201 movement type as on 30.03.2014, and then as on 31.03.2014, you can reverse the entry..
Now you have to reverse the 201 movement type after date 31.03.2014.
Regards
Dev -
MESSAGE ERROR: WIP a target cost only possible with Product Cost by Period
I work with orders assign to WBS Element (Non-valuated stock).
If I enter confirmation to an order created, and then execute KKAX transaction to calculate WIP, the system shows this error message u201Cu2018WIP a target cost only possible with Product Cost by Periodu2019u201D, but actually the result has been calculated ok.
If WIP is executed collectively KKAO the error message is the same but the result is not calculated
Everything suggests that what we want is possible, but the error doesnu2019t disappear
Does anyone know what could be reason for the error?
ThanksHi
Check your RA key and WIP customizing... WIP at target cost is possible only in Product cost by period
Check your settlement rule in Prod Order.. I guess it would be FUL and not PER.. FUL settlement means you are in product cost by order.. There seems to be a mismatch between your settlement type (FUL/PER) and WIP config
Moreover, if your stock is non valuated, do you at all need to calculate WIP for prod orders? I dont think so
Ajay M -
Hi Gurus,
I am facing the error message "Posting is only possible in periods... in Company Code...."
Where in config settings, I can fix that.
Thanks,
Kumarhi,
This error occurs because your posting are not allowed for current period....
For this you have to firstly check the open periods in OMSY...
For eg : if its open for 02 2008, then Go to MMPV...
Enter the Co. code
Period : Eg 03
Year 2008
And then execute....
If its open for 2007 etc, then click the excute button once, then system will show you a message, and just after that again click the main execute button....
Then system will show you a log....
You can see the changed open periods in OMSY again...
Go on opening one by one till you reach the current one ie 10 2008...
Regards
Priyanka.P -
Reset to previous RESTORE POINT only possible with FLASHBACK ?
Ok, I can create a Restore Point (in v10g) by a command like:
CREATE RESTORE POINT foobar;
Actually I expected a symmetric command which reverts the whole database back
with a command like
RESET to RESTORE POINT foobar;
However I did not found such a (or similar) command.
Instead the only way I found was by a FLASHBACK command:
FLASHBACK DATABASE TO RESTORE POINT foobar;
Is this correct? Is there no other command for reverting back to a previous RESTORE POINT?
PeterHI
Well there is no such command "RESET to RESTORE POINT foobar".....its... "Flashback database to restore point"
now question is that why we use flashback database to restore point? for example we want to run some application on our database but we are not sure that it might create some unwanted changes in our database ...so we mount our database and enable flashback then we create restore point let say "create restore point beforeupgrade"....and then we run our application now if we find some unwanted changes in our database we will flashback database to created restore point.
here is the link to understand more......
http://arjudba.blogspot.com/2008/04/performing-flashback-database.html.. -
Hi Profs
I was having a issue where posting was only possible between 2007/5 and 2007/4.
So I used 'mmpv' and one by one moved the posting to 1 -2008.
Now while posting, I get 'posting only possible in periods 2008/01 and 2007/12'.
I guess I have overshot the dates(also evident in 'omsy'). How can I bring the posting back for this month.?
ThanksSAP allows only posting into current and previous period in MM.
If you need to post in periods before, then you have to roll the periods back using MMPI , which may cause big trouble and huge effort and a lot of discipline. I would never do that, and would never recommend to do it.
Read the helpinfo in MMPI and search OSS notes on MMPI and you will learn not to do it. -
we use F-28 to post incoming payment for company code 1110, customer account 10003, but this customer doesn't have any open item, so in "post incoming payments select open items" screen, we choose another company code 2110 and another customer 20003, 20003 has open items, we fill in the cash discount, the "not assigned" field now is zero, but when we try to save, it displays the error:
Account 3000060 2110 for deductions/discounts must not be tax-relevant
Message no. F5037
Diagnosis
The system wants to create an automatic posting for cash discount deductions or unauthorized deductions in the above-mentioned account.
In company code 2110, no tax adjustment is defined for such deductions (in table T001, it was specified that the cash discount base is the net amount). In this case, the account to be posted must not be tax-relevant.
Procedure
Correct the master record of the account mentioned above.
our setting for account 3000060 is : tax catgory:+, line item display, post auto only, since this account has balance, what should I do to save the F-28 result? thanksHi Jolinchew,
As far as I know,The tax category of the G/L account you are using must be unassigned.Reason: the expense-account for deductions/discounts must not be tax-relevant.
So you can consider to change the g/l account master record to a non-tax relevant status or to use a different g/l account which is not tax relevant.
Hope above infor. could help you to solve this error.
With Best Regards,
Gladys Xing -
Explorer on BW Only Possible?
I have been asked to investigate if Business Object Explorer is supported on BW 7.3 and 7.4 and or there is a work around for BI 4.0 SP7 and or BI 4.1 SP3? I have read the admin guide and it mentions that OLAP data sources are not supported.
When I recently spoke with a person from SAP, they said that they thought Explorer 4.0 was supported for BW.
I tried to clarify that we do not have BWA or Hana, just BW. I have read where it might be possible to use Explorer on a BW DSO with a universe, but this is not very useful to us, unless we were to create DSOs out of calculated results from cube.
Can anyone clarify this? Our CIO and CFO like the presentations they have seen on Explorer and do not understand why we cannot use it with SAP BW.
Lee LewisLewis,
I have the same issues recently, and with company officials at the Sapphire conference, the SAP sales people are just lending to the confusion because they don't understand the technicals or support that is identified.
The platform compatiblity list for support, specifically states that OLAP universe are not supported. BW and HANA are supported but BW is only supported through HANA or BWA.
Now I am an Admin/Engineer, not a developer or data architect; have been for 15+ years dating back to when this was SI 6.5 (Seagate Info) and Crystal Reports 6.5. I have migrated and built systems through Crystal Enterprise to BusinessObjects XI and now BI 4.1.
I have tested on 4.1SP3; and yes, you can build a universe (unv or unx) on BW queries, but that is the definition of an OLAP universe, even though it is a relational connection.
I find that the BEX Queries the way most are written for BEX Reports are inadequate in design for exploration of the data. Heirarchies don't work, and all you will get is the L00 and L01 dimensions, NO DETAIL OBJECTS. from the universe.
Again OLAP Universes are not supported for Explorer. Test this by trying to convert a unv on BEX to a UNX through the IDT, and it will tell you it doesn't support conversion of OLAP Universes and to use BICs. You must rebuild it with SAP Jco connection to the query, but then why rebuild if the design was to go to BICs? The reason for that would be customized universes, that lay on top of an injected BEX statement. Some places do that; requires more maintenance during refreshing the unvierses, but in those necessary cases that BEX/MDX will not let you do what you need in the query, you are only left with the universe or analysis document (RPT, WID, etc) to manipulate the data the way that is required for the task at hand.
There is documentation out there of using excel data from BW to drive the InfoSpace, and Exploration View set that you schedule for refresh. This turns out to be a Rube Goldberg design approach to the issue, as you need to perform multiple steps for one InfoSpace/Exploration View.
1. Design and schedule the WebI or Crystal output to Excel.
2. Then use that excel for base of the Information Space
3. Then through CMC capture the actual location of the file in the FRS, used for InfoSpace,
4. Schedule the webi to export the results to that new location only over-writing itself.
5. Set the recurring schedule in both the infospace for indexing and the webI.
Voila! You have the most cumbersome design of getting supported BW data into Explorer without HANA, BWA, or Data Services pipiing into a datamart or other flattened RDBMS style source to get SAP to support it via their documentation.
The Biggest ERROR made by companies and Executive is thinking that SBOP is SAP. SAP Owns it, but BusinessObjects remains BusinessObjects. We provide Business Intelligence Solutions for everything the company can provide access to in the way of data, not just SAP, and not exclusively SAP. BusinessObjects was originally designed for Relational Databases, OLAP was added for Voyager/Pioneer (now Analysis for OLAP). The design driving force behind everything SAP is now HANA.
I have requests to look at InfiniteInsight, Predictive Analysis, Lumira, and other applications that are SAP and not SBOP, but like SBOP are acquired assests and not true SAP NW Applications. 90% of them will not work directly with BW like Crystal and WebI does for reports without going through another interface, layer, and/or appliance.
Calvin Shipman -
Getting Invalid Intersection for Account with net 0 balance
Hi FDM Gurus,
We are getting an invalid intersection error for an account that nets to zero in the validate step, because the individual amounts that net to zero are coming in from the source system without an ICP member (hence mapping to ICP None). The account in HFM is an "IsICP", so ICP None is invalid (is blocked for input by a rule).
The individual amounts in the import section include 2 source accounts that are mapped to the same account, and also mapped to the exact same dimension members for that HFM account:
E00210 B420199 [ICP NONE] NORF NOFUNC FDMLOAD NOC4 <ENTITY CURRENCY> 1000
E00210 B420199 [ICP NONE] NORF NOFUNC FDMLOAD NOC4 <ENTITY CURRENCY> -1000
In the validate step, the data is condensed into 1 line, with a zero balance.
E00210 B420199 [ICP NONE] NORF NOFUNC FDMLOAD NOC4 <ENTITY CURRENCY> 0
Here is the invalid intersection report. Interestingly, only 1 of the 2 offsetting accounts (one with the negative balance) shows up in the report:
Detail Dimensions:
FM Entity FM Account ICP NOE_RF Function DataType C4 Data Value Amount
E00210 B420199 [ICP NONE] NORF NOFUNC FDMLOAD NOC4 <ENTITY CURRENCY> -1000
Does anyone know how to avoid this issue? We tried to post a journal for each line item in which we tried to 'back out' the source system amount (offsetting entry) and included another entry with a valid ICP member. But we still get the invalid intersection error.
Is there a way to fix this (short of doing something in the import script to prevent data from importing, which we prefer not to do)?
Thanks,
MarkThanks for the reply. Actually, in this situation, the source data is coming in with an ICP partner (999) that is mapped ato [ICP None]. It's an exceptional case where the source data in this account contained an ICP partner that we already have mapped to ICP None, and it was not possible to go back and change the source data. BUT the source account has to be mapped to an IsICP account in HFM (one-off situation).
So we posted the journal to try to zero out the balance, and make additional entry in the journal to manually move the balance to an ICP partner.
I would think if the balance is 0.00 in the account, it would not try to validate the intersection in HFM. But it seems to be validating based on each individual source account, although they net out to zero in total for the HFM account.
I'm not sure if there is much we can do here. Just hoping maybe someone had run into the issue and could share how they resolved it... -
Payment wizard-- include vendors with zero balance
Hi-
We are running SAP 8.8 pl 13.
We want to be able to include Vendors with a zero balance in the payment wizard. The scenario in question is this: we have an advance outgoing payment on account that is open. We have an open AP Invoice for the the same amount. The vendor account balance is zero, but we want to go ahead and pay the open invoice anyway.
Currently- if a vendor has a zero account balance the vendor code cannot be selected in step 3 of the payment wizard.
Is there a way to configure this?
I realize that this is counter-intuitive....
thanks
JohnHi John,
Do you mean your open advance outgoing payment on account has the same amount with open AP Invoice? However you need another payment for the invoice and still hold the advance?
Thanks,
Gordon -
"Posting with reference to pur. order only possible for integrated whse"
When I try posting GR with mvmt type 101 wrt PO I am receiving the error “Posting with reference to pur. order only possible for integrated whse”
The scenario is storage lcation is maintained with the external warehouse management .
Is there anything i need to maintain warehouse as decentralised one or should i need to maintain any moment types or is there anything else i should maintain in the customisation.
Kindly guide me regarding this as I am new to WM ,Thanks in advance.Hi ,
In my case i have not maintained as decentralised one.
also the thing is there is no warehouse house data managed over here .the requirement is when connected to extended warehouse the system has to create inspection lot after the GR has done ,
whereas in normal scenario everything is normal,
can you please suggest what should be done in this case.
Also if possible can you please tell me what from the scratch so that it will be helpful to come through . -
During PGI - Error - Posting only possible in periods 2006/12 and 2006/11
Hi,
I am a new to SAP.
I am testing creating sales order. While posting Goods Issue, I am getting error " Posting only possible in periods 2006/12 and 2006/11 in company code 1000"
I searched and got solutions in SDN- Forum as well as SAP best practice buidling blocks and tried but still the same error is appearing.
I tried the following:
1) Transaction code - OMSY - The details for company code 1000 is:
Year-Period-Fin Year - Period-Fin Year-LM
2006-12 -2006 - 11 -2005 -12
I modify this to Year to 2011- Period to 1-other fields not possible to modify and save, but the changes does not reflect when we open this screen again. It displsys old date.
2) Then I tried Transaction code - MMPV -
I enter the follwoing details
From Company code -1000
To Comnpany code -1000
Period
Year - I tried to enter from 01/2005 to 12/2010 and click execute, i am getting error mesasage that these are not current year.
If i enter 01/2011, it is going to next log page but with errror message that 01/2011 is not current year and 12/2006 is current year.
3) Then I tried - SPRO - Financial Accounting (NEW) ® Financial Accounting Global Settings (New) ® Ledgers ® Fiscal Year and Posting Periods ® Posting Periods ® Open and Close Posting Periods
and entered the follwing data and save.
Var. A To account From per. 1 Year To period Year From per. 2 Year To period Year
1000 + 1 2000 12 2011 12 2000 16 2011
1000 A zzzzzzzzzz 1 2000 12 2011 12 2000 16 2011
1000 D zzzzzzzzzz 1 2000 12 2011 12 2000 16 2011
1000 K zzzzzzzzzz 1 2000 12 2011 12 2000 16 2011
1000 M zzzzzzzzzz 1 2000 12 2011 12 2000 16 2011
1000 S zzzzzzzzzz 1 2000 12 2011 12 2000 16 2011
Please suggest how to clear this error message.
Regards
KasiDear Kasi
its not a problem if you are working on IDES.
Enter T code SE16N.
Enter table name MARV. Press enter.
Enter your company code in the required field. Press enter.
Enter &SAP_EDIT in the place where you entered the T code. Press enter. Now it is in edit mode.
Execute (click on Clock icon). A new screen appears.
Enter The Current Year: Current Month: Year of the previous Month: Previous month: Last year: Last month of the calendar year. As asked in the screen.
Press enter. Save and come outside.
Please do remember all the time period should be as per your system calendar.
Also do remember this is only workable when you are using IDES for education purpose only. Because skipping so many periods in between can cause problems when you are on real time scenario. Using MMPV is the standard procedure where you close the periods one by one.
Try it.
Update forum.
Pawan Sharma
Edited by: Pawan KS on Feb 10, 2011 12:33 PM -
Posting only possible in periods 2011/11 and 2011/10 in company code 4000
Hi All Experts,
I have encountered with this error while doing MIGO.
Posting only possible in periods 2011/11 and 2011/10 in company code 4000
Message no. M7053
Diagnosis
The posting date entered is not within one of the permitted posting periods (current period/previous period).
This can be due to one of two reasons:
The correct current period has not been set in the system.
For the system, the first of the entered periods is the current period. At the beginning of a new period, your systems administrator must change the current period in the material master record, using the function "Shift periods". This has not yet been done.
You have entered a wrong date in the field "Posting date".
Procedure
Check the posting date and correct it if necessary. If your input is correct, inform your systems administrator that the "period shifting" (period-end closing) process has not yet been completed.
I have checked OB52, OB29, OB37, MMPV, MMRV. All possible T.codes and threads I tried from SDN itself, still no luck ! In OB52 I have opened 2011 & 2012 year open absolute.
Would like to share MMRV settings :-
Current Period : 11 / 2011
Previous Period : 10 / 2011
Last period in prev year : 12 / 2010
We have India based client so fiscal year variant is Apr to March copied from V3.
Will be very much appreciable experts guidane !
Regards,
Sharvari Joshi.Hi All Experts,
I raised the OSS, and here which I got the reply from SAP.
There is a possibility to run the report RMMMINIT to initialize posting
periods. Please bear in mind that the valuation data of the previous
period could get affected.
If you decide to proceed with the process, please review the
documentation of program RMMMINIT.
Please also review attached note 70545 regarding the initialization
process. Although this note is NOT valid for your release, it provides
good information on the use of initialization for correction purposes.
Additionally, please review attached note 369637 in this regard as well.
PLEASE FIRST PERFORM THIS IN A TEST/DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM PRIOR TO MOVING
TO PRODUCTION AS YOUR VALUATION DATA FROM PREVIOUS PERIOD WILL BE
AFFECTED. If you are satisfied with the results, then you can move it
to production. Please perform this at your own risk as this hotline
will not support any problems arising out of it.
Related the error message MM016 please follow the steps from note
487381:
To reserve the parameter use transaction SU01 for the user's name who
executes the RMMMINIT program. The parameter must be set as follows:
Parameter Value
MMPI_READ_NOTE YYYYMMDD (for the current date)
I am not able make out any meaning out of it. Can anyone please understand me this ?
Help will be appreciated !
Reagrds,
Sharvari Joshi.
P.S : Steps from my side which I performed , I changed the parameters for my ID in SU01 to current date 2011.11.16 (YYYYMMDD) and running MMPI still same error.
Maybe you are looking for
-
The sound become unavailble. It mutes on its own and cannot be interacted with.
The Audio just cuts out when I'm listening to iTunes. I haven't noticed the problem in any other program (I don't listen to much audio eslewhere) when the sound stops, the playback is continuous. When the sound stops the speaker icon become grey a
-
For some reason, all of a sudden my 160gb ATV won't successfully sync TV shows that I have downloaded into iTunes. The sync progress bar just sits there and barely moves for hours, and then it gives up. Anything I can do to fix this?
-
How to change Delta_X value in SignalExpr​ess?
Hello all, I'm acquiring a thermocouple (type T) reading using SignalExpress and NI9211 data acquisition + NI USB-9162 converter. 1 reading every 100 msec. Very simple setup. Anyhow, when I export the data using the built-in function, I get a file wh
-
My ipad is disabled connect iTunes and i couldn't do anything with the screen
please help how unlock my ipad due multible atemp incorrect pass code
-
Document regarding bw implementation for industries lik electricity genara
hi Iam working on scm-cpm area. I need ur help on any documentation or reports for industries like electricity genarating authority or utilities. This is very urgent, So please respond as soon as possible. ormail me at :-- [email protected] regards