F110 payment postings individual invoices

Hi,
When executing the paymentrun (Direct debits), the payment program generates 1 payment posting (clearing document) per customer in which several open items/invoices are processed.
Now we want to have a payment document (clearing document) for each invoice, so no grouping on customer level.
So in case 1 customer has 3 invoices to be direct debited, we want to have 3 clearing documents.
Is it possible to set this up in the configuration?
I was not able to find it.
If not, is there a user-exit / BADI / BAPI we can use?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Jurriaan

Hi
In Vendor/Customer Master Data, Under Automatic Payment transactions you will assign Payment method. under payment method there will be individual payment checkbox.
select this individual payment checkbox , 1 clearing document will be generated for each invoice ie seperate payment per invoice.
Regards
Venkat
Edited by: Venkat Dara on Jan 9, 2009 11:51 AM

Similar Messages

  • APP - F110 - Payment of multiple invoices with different document type

    Hi
    Vendor X has been assigned with payment method same with two document types. One document type got 4 invoices and other document type got 1 invoice.
    During payment run (F110) for each document type, the system picked up both the document type but listed them as two separate lines in the proposal list. When we process the payment the system also created two payment documents.
    Is there a way for these two document types to be processed as a single proposal and payment.
    Any suggestion how can we process these invoices together in a single proposal/payment document?
    Thanks & Regards,
    Sam

    Thanks

  • F110 payment run - split on invoice line item that exceed certain amount

    Dear expert,
    Now i want to ask is there any ways to configure F110 - payment run to auto checking on whenever the amount of one fi document is more than USD100,000 will auto split to second payment item.
    *i have already tick individual pmnt on tcode FK02 - change vendor master data (at automatic payment transactions column). This method will split all fi document under same vendor post with different posting document number.
    I would like to ask is there any way to configure auto split on the fi document (if the document is exceed some amount) for payment run.
    thanks and appreciate

    i have put distribution amount.
    Let say i put distribution amount USD100, after i run payment run, one account payable document will generate one payment document.
    As what i want is- if the ap document is USD 200, then the payment document will generate two payment document.
    Coz my enquiry is if the payment is excedd USD100 we need to assign to another tt payment as the TT is only accept maximum USD100 transfer.
    Expert, please advice on ur view.
    Thanks and appreciate much on ur previous help.
    regards,
    Ng Chong Chuan

  • Invoice and Payment postings

    Hi all,
    1) I have a requirement to send invoice header and details to 3rd party system based on customer.
    2) Subsequently the 3rd party system posts the payment using bank Check or Credit Card.
    What are the Trx codes (tables or Function Modules) for these functionalities?
    Thanks in Adv,

    Hi
    Your question is not clear.
    I hope your requirement is as below:
    May be it's relating to Accounts Payable
    Invoice created in SAP - details of the invoice sends to the 3rd party system - 3rd party makes the payment.
    I will explain the step wise solution for the above scenario:
    1) Invoice created in SAP - It will update the Tables: BKPF, BSEG, BSIK
    2) Do the payment for the Invoice posted in step-1 - It will update the Tables: BKPF, BSEG, BSAK : It is required otherwise, always the vendor balances shows red, that means unpaid. Here, the payment can be made using different payment method based on availability of the vendor bank details.
    3) Create an outbound program, which will send the details of the payment to the 3rd Party: Details should include vendor name, vendor address details, vendor bank details, etc. Look up the Tables: LFA1, LFB1, LFBK, BSAK, BKPF.
    4) 3rd party will pay the amount based on the payment method (check / bk transfer).
    VVR

  • F110 payment run - split vendor invoice

    Dear,
    For some vendors, the payment of the invoices should be split over 2 bank accounts.
    Currently they clear the invoice via transaction FB05 and split the amount over 2 bankaccounts for this vendor. Then we do the payment run.
    This works fine but they loose a lot of time with this process.
    Now we are looking for a process to avoid the clearing but split the amount during the payment run over 2 bankaccounts.
    Are there some userexits where we can manipulate the REGUH/REGUP tables to do the manipulations by ourselves or is there a standard SAP approach to accomplish this ?
    wkr,
    Andy

    Hi Andy,
    Did you find the solution for the above requirement?
    Vendor 1012 has a total amount of 100 euro.
    60 % should be paid to account 1 (=60 euro)
    40 % should be paid to account 2 (=40 euro).
    Even I am trying to find the solution for the same requirement?
    Kindly reply/
    Regards,
    Sravan

  • Issues during F110 - Payment of invoice posted last year

    Hi gurus,
    Last month we had some problems during the payment of several invoices because they have been posted last year. When the user is trying to pay it, the system shows the following message: u201CFI234 u2013 Different FM fiscal years: Invoice XXXX for paymentu201D
    To solve this problem we run two transactions, FMJ2 (Year-End Closing: Carryforward of Open Items), to carry open items from 2011 to 2012 and the transaction FMAVCREINIT (Re-Initialize Availability Control Ledgers (FM), to reinitialize the ledgers.
    With this procedure we solve the problem for several invoices, but, for some reason, some invoices remain with this problem even though doesnu2019t exist open item last year (2011) anymore.
    Does anyone know if is there any step during carry forwarding open items that weu2019re skipping to solve this kind of issue?
    Best Regards,
    Amorim, Rodrigo

    HI
    you need to apply follwoing note
    Note 411323 - Profile 500: Payment for previous-year invoice
    Note 533106 - RFFMS200: Error message of FI234
    Note 535525 - RFFMS200: Error message FI234 (2)
    It will resolves your issue
    Reg
    Vishnu

  • Duplicate payments in Payment list of F110 payment run

    Hello all,
    We had run APP trhu F110 payment run was as expected with amount 100000 EUR but when we checked payment list (EDIT- Payment - Payment list) there are duplicate entries and total is showing as 200000 EUR.
    Following are onservations
    1) In SAP posting made correctly to all vendors with a total of 100000 EUR. So no double payments posted in vendor account 
    2) Payment list is showing amounts with a doument numbers. Duplicate payments also having document numbers but which are not exists in SAP
    3) Documents posted with doc type ZP in sap is not in serial i.e 1,2,3,4 Its posted like 1,3,5,7... the document no 2,4 can be seen in the payment list
    4) Also I checked log for the payment run and I found one warning message as "Check whether a duplicate payment medium has been created"
    5) Also status of payment run is "Posting orders: 1,174 generated, 605 completed"
    6) I also checked setting in FBZP which is also correct
    We need to correct the DME file with correect postings
    If anyone has faced issue then please share your inputs
    Thanks & regards

    Dear Rajan,
    the payment document validation works as follows:
    If you select this parameter, a form is only printed if the related
    payment document has already been posted.
    Note that it is not advisable to schedule the payment program and the
    data medium programs to run at the same time, if you want the system to
    be able to carry out validation of the payment documents - because the
    system does not start posting the documents at the same time as the
    program runs, and in order to ensure that the payment program generally
    finishes its run before all the payment documents have been posted, the
    payment medium program (started after the payment program) would display
    in the error list any documents that have not (yet) been found.
    As a result double payments are not possible as no payment media is
    created if the payment document is not posted. The items are still
    open and are selected in the next payment run again.
    If the payment document validation is not used, the payment media is
    created but the open item is not cleared as the payment document is
    not posted. In this case you have to clear the open items manually
    (if a repeat update is not possible) to avoid double payments.
    dear Prashant,
    It is normal that if the automatic payment does not pay all the items, You can find them hanging into sm13.
    However, in general, when this happens you could try to use the edit >
    payments > after termination > draw up again option, if it is
    available.  If there is an entry in SM13, as in Your case, you should process it.
    But sometimes the System does not allow to do it.
    Anyway the only problem I can see is the one reported by the note 545340:
    When the payment program is terminated, it may be the case that not all
    payment documents exist on the updated database while the entries
    already exist in the tables REGUH and REGUP. However, this basic
    procedure has the advantage that the payment media can already be
    created for the purpose of fast forwarding to the bank when for example
    the payment documents update is delayed.
    For this problem please refer to the Note 545340 point [4]
    that answers to it.
    Furthermore please be aware that:
    as I told You in the beginning, If the payment program does not pay
    all the invoices contained into the payment proposal, It will depend on
    the fact that during the payment proposal run time and the payment
    proposal time, something changed respect one of the selected invoices.
    This means that one document number was NOT posted even if It is
    contained in the tables REGUH and REGUP.
    Please be informed payment data tables REGU* are used by only payment
    program and no need to take any corrective action and should not be a
    problem with auditors.
    So You can pay the invoices manually or by the next automatic payment
    run without any problem.
    I hope now the System behaviour is more clear.
    Mauri

  • FI  F110 payment run multiple payment documents for same vendor l

    We have an issue where a F110 automatic payment run creates two payment documents for the same vendor multiple open items in the same run. The payment method for all the open items is the same.  I am not able to identify the logic based on which system bifurcates these open items to create two different payment documents. It is standard SAP functionality and we do not have any additional customization.
    I have also checked criteria mentioned in FBZP Payment method in company code Payment per due day but does not seem to be relevant. If you have any pointers in this context request you to share the same at the earliest.

    Hello,
    In FBZP we have below setting for grouping of items in company code payment method.
    1.Single payment for marked line item: Single payment will be created for every line item if this check box is selected.
    2.Payment per due day: One payment document is created for all the invoices which are due on specific due date.
    Please check if any of above option is selected here.
    We have also control at vendor master:
    Vendor master data > Company code > Payment data > Automatic payment transactions > individual payment.
    If check box is selected then every vendor or customer item is paid separately during automatic payment transactions.
    Thanks!
    Raju

  • F110  Payment Run

    I am having a problem with F110 Payment run. It's showing the error as: 'Item cannot be paid due to inconsistent withholding tax'. I have done the payment run for the same vendor, same company code and it worked well. Later, I deleted one of the WH Tax type in Vendor Master. Has anyone come across this or similar issue?. What can I do to solve this?.

    hi,
      I am not able to see the Deleted WH Tax info. when I run the RFWT0010. I tried to do the payment run after executing RFWT0010, but am not able to resolve the problem. I have run the S_P00_07000134(the 1099 report) a few days back(before posting the new Invoices). Do you think this has anything to do with the existing problem. And I have checked the config. again for the tax type, Tax codes and their assignments to Co.Cd. which everything seems to be correct. I tried to pay using f-53 which is showing the same error.
    As Hein said i tried to look in the Invoice doc. for the WHTax info.(I have the setting to do calculate the WHTax amount @ the Payment level). So, its not possible to delete the Tax code and make the settings in VM.
    As per suresh, I have checked the validity of the tax code its(1/1/2000-12/31/9999). And the tax type, tax code are assigned in the VMR.
    I am not able to resolve this. Has anyone come across the same/similar issue and resolved it?.

  • Payment program- Individual payment

    HI Gurus
    We have a vendor who needs an indvidual payment for every invoice we receive from him.
    We have the "Individual Payment" checked in the vendor master.
    Now this week we have a credit memo posted against this vendor, and the payment program is paying all invoices separately but it is not clearing the credit memo on the Vendor. Resulting that the credit memo will never be cleared.
    Please advise
    many thanks
    MSJ

    HI
    Credit memo will not work in an individual payment scenario as it can't be offset against other invoices.
    You have a couple of options,
    (a) Manually offset invoices against the credit memo, if there is a difference charge it to the vendor and explain it to him what all invoices and credit memo have been offset.
    (b) If the Vendor insists on individual payment, you will have to manually send the credit memo to vendor for payment. When the payment is received, clear the credit memo manually in SAP.
    Regards

  • F110 payment only possible 8 days after net due date, why?

    Hi all,
    When we try to post a payment in F110 by choosing a next p/date as for example 24 April all invoices with net due date up to that date will be included. In payment proposal only invoices with net due date up to 15 April is included, not invoices with net due date 16 April and after. There is something with a tolerance of 8 days but I don´t know where this configuration is set. Payment terms is 30 days net and there I can´t find anything about any tolerance days and i can´t find anything in FBZP either. Does anyone know where I can find these days set?
    We want to create the payment per net due date. We don´t work with payment order.
    BR L

    Hi,
    Check in transaction code FBZP, all company codes. Double click on the company code, you will the find the tolerance days for payable.
    Thanks
    Aravind

  • Open items (F110 payment proposal)

    Hi All,
    Can someone clarify what are open items
    1: invoices that are not cleared
    2: credit memos
    3:credit memos applied  to an invoice
    4:residuals
    (When i run FBl5N credit memos are also shown as open items)
    Also when i run F110 payment proposal  it selects open items. Does it also select credit memo's?
    Any help appreciated
    Thanks,
    Prashanth

    1: invoices that are not cleared -  YES
    2: credit memos - YES, if not cleared against any invoice
    3:credit memos applied to an invoice - YES
    4:residuals - once you do the payment system create new invoice for balance , that will open item
    When i run FBl5N credit memos are also shown as open items - if not cleared against any invoice that will come under open item list.
    Also when i run F110 payment proposal it selects open items. Does it also select credit memo's?  - YES, which are in red , are called as open items...all the items in open will come in F110 proposal run
    VVR

  • Posting Cash Payments and Clearing Invoices

    Hi everybody,
    Can anybody suggest a transaction to post payments (money) and clear FI invoices.
    I am looking for a transaction where the user can pull an invoice by doing a search by invoice number, or by PO number, and to post a payment against the invoice, do clear it down.
    I tried the transaction F-28 and, apparently, I can´t search the invoice by the PO number.
    Appreciate your help!
    Thank you very much!
    Kind regards
    Drimas

    Hello,
    If I understand correctly you are trying to make payment for vendor invoice. Whereas, the transaction code F-28 relating to Customers.
    You have two option in SAP to post invoice
    1. MIRO - If you have Purchase Order details and your MM module is in place, then you can post. However, before posting MIRO, you should have Purchase Order in place ME21N and goods receipt must have been made in MIGO.
    2. If it is pure FI Invoice, then you can post the invoice through F-43 or FB60
    Now for any of the invoices 1 or 2, you would like to make the payment,
    You can make the payment by using
    F-53 - Creates Payment Document (To assign check manually use FCH5, to assign automatically use FBZ5)
    F-58 - Creates the Payment document as well as assign the check automatically.
    F110 - For Automatic Payment Program
    If you want to void the check, then FCH9
    If you want to void the check as well reverse payment document FCH8
    If you have not assigned any check so far, but would like to reverse the payment document, then use FBRA.
    Once you have reversed the payment, if you still wanted reverse invoice document, then use FB08.
    If you want to see the check register, use FCHN.
    To update the check number on assignment or reference field, you can use FCHU.
    May be some of transaction codes are irrelevant for you, but just for your future reference, I have provided additional information.
    Please let me know if you need any further information.
    Regards,
    Ravi

  • F110 Payment Proposal multiple payment lines for same vendor

    Hello,
    Question for the FI community regarding single payments for multiple invoices for the same vendor. Is there any other place that would dictate the grouping (or non grouping) of multiple payment proposal lines for same vendor payment?
    I understand that there are two places:
    FBZP - Change view 'Maintenance of Company Code Data for a Payment Method", the flag for 'Single payment for marked item'
    Vendor Master - Automatic payment transactions, flag for 'Individual pmnt'
    Is there anywhere else where this may be dictated? At my location, we have two company codes that make ACH payments, settings for FBZP (Single payment for marked item flag) and selected vendor for payment in the vendor master is identical. I get different results when viewing the payment proposal for each company code. Company Code A parses out individual line items for payment in the proposal, and Company Code B does not. When I change the flag via FBZP for Company Code A, this resolves the issue. When I make the same change for Company Code B, there is no change.
    In all of my testing, I have left the 'Individual pmnt' flag for both vendor masters unchecked.
    I'm hoping that somebody in the community here would be able to point me in the right direction to understand why I am getting differences. Is there somewhere else that I can check?
    Thanks everyone.

    Ravi,
    Thanks for your reply, however in my post I already mentioned I have tested out both options via FBZP as well as the vendor master. You are correct, in only one case regarding my situation.
    In my example for Company Code B, I have the following scenarios:
    1. FBZP - single payment for marked item checked, Vendor individual payment option not checked, result is a single payment item for multiple invoices
    2. FBZP - single payment for marked item checked, Vendor individual payment option is checked, result is multiple payment items for each invoice
    3. FBZP - single payment for marked item not checked, Vendor individual payment option not checked, result is a single payment item for multiple invoices
    4. FBZP - single payment for marked item not checked, Vendor individual payment option is checked, result is a multiple payment items for each invoice
    Are you saying that the option in FBZP simply enables the grouping/non grouping based on what the vendor master record payment option is? Typically, that option for vendors is not checked in either of our company codes, therefore if the only difference is the setting in FBZP, then why would I be getting only a single payment for multiple invoices in the case of scenario 1 listed above?
    That's why I am wondering if perhaps there is something elsewhere than FBZP and vendor master settings that could be affecting this.
    Comments please?

  • F110 payment run - Plant wise

    Dear All,
    We have a  scenario where clients is having five plants under one legal entity.
    Client wants F110 payment run  separately for all vendor invoices specific to the plant.
    For all plants , there are separate bank accounts and respective invoice must go to plant specific bank account as this is legal requirement of the country.
    Could you please let me know configuration steps to manage this scenario.
    Also can you let us know, how can we make payment to selected Vendors in F110 ( additional field tab).
    In paramater tab,we have the option to incorporate the selected vendor codes.
    In additional field tab,we have only 3 row with a range of Vendor codes.
    Now i want to make payment to 50 vendors(specific to one plant) the vendor codes are 001,18,58,193,etc......how can we do this  while we run the payment program.
    Do suggest
    Regards

    When you are posting an invoice, some field in the invoice document must have plant information. Based on that you can substitute the House Bank. Lets say for example, You enter the value "Plant1" in the Assignment field of the vendor invoice. and you want to pay Plant1 invoices through house Bank HBK01. Then your should create a substitution rule saying if the value in say assignment field is "Plant1" then substitute House Bank field in the vendor line with value HBK01. If you are using a dedicated vendor number ranges specific to plant, then you can do the house bank substitution based on vendor ID as well, and then you don't have to enter Plant info in the invoice.
    Then all the invoices will have right house bank data. Now to make sure that you are paying to vendor posting specific to a plant in the payment run. You can go to FREE SELECTION tab of payment run(F110) when you enter parameters, and in the drop down under field name double click others option and select the document and enter. and then select and enter the field that you are using to enter plant information. In my example I have used Assignment field to enter plant information. So, I will select BSEG-ZUONR. Then I will go to Values field and enter "Plant1". Then Payment run will pick up only "Plant1" invoices.
    If you already using some rules to enter the house bank in the invoice, then you might not want to use the substitution rule. But find out which field in the vendor invoice has plant infomation, and select that field as i have shown above though FREE SELECTION.
    Thanks
    ROn

Maybe you are looking for