F110 Payment Proposal BTE
Hi ABAP Gurus,
Can you please suggest a Business Transaction Events (BTE) that I can use when performing Payment Proposal via F110? Basically, I will be updating the Payment Method (REGUP-ZLSCH) via this BTE.
Thank you very much and have a nice day.
hello Brando Braganza ,
y u want to updatte Payment method fields while doing the proposal only ?.....
y dont u update this fields while creating the finance document itself ?
regards
Prabhu
Similar Messages
-
Open items (F110 payment proposal)
Hi All,
Can someone clarify what are open items
1: invoices that are not cleared
2: credit memos
3:credit memos applied to an invoice
4:residuals
(When i run FBl5N credit memos are also shown as open items)
Also when i run F110 payment proposal it selects open items. Does it also select credit memo's?
Any help appreciated
Thanks,
Prashanth1: invoices that are not cleared - YES
2: credit memos - YES, if not cleared against any invoice
3:credit memos applied to an invoice - YES
4:residuals - once you do the payment system create new invoice for balance , that will open item
When i run FBl5N credit memos are also shown as open items - if not cleared against any invoice that will come under open item list.
Also when i run F110 payment proposal it selects open items. Does it also select credit memo's? - YES, which are in red , are called as open items...all the items in open will come in F110 proposal run
VVR -
F110 - Payment proposal simulator
Dear all,
does anybody knows if SAP provide a standard report ables to perform a simulation of payment proposal?
That is, I need to extract the total amount of an hypothetic payment but without locking all open items as F110 does.
Thanks in advance!
DavideDear Andreas, my aim is just to avoid to run the proposal and lock all open item.
So, table REGUH and REGUP are unusable.
Thanks and best regards
Davide -
Hi FI Gurus,
The vendor master have house bank key xxx1 ( SGD Bank a/c). while making payment to vendor through F110, I want to change house bank key with xxx2 (USD Bank a/c) in payment proposal with option re-allocate, but system won't allowed and giving errors msg. " Change not allowed - change payment amount". I unable to make payment to vendor with HB key xxx2
Is HB is picking from vendor master? or am I doing any mistatake? Please help to resolve my matter. Thanks in advance.
Regards,
PrakashHi
House Bank is not an editable field once you create an invoice.
So it will throw error.
Regards
Srini -
F110 Payment Proposal - Payment Methods
Regardless of what payment method(s) you enter in the F110 parameters, the payment proposal still comes back with all open items - this can produce a long proposal list consisting mostly of exceptions (exceptions being open items not having the payment method you requested).
Is there any way of getting F110 to only select open items that have the payment method(s) you are interested in, and therefore considerably shorten the length of the proposal (and therefore the length of time it takes users to process it)?
Thanks.Hi,
I'm seeking for a possibility to select only open items which are due for more then e.g. 10 days.
I've tried to use field Days in arrears [BSEG-PENDAYS] as a criteria for selection of items which where overdue for more then 10 days, but I couldn't fill the proper parameters.
Which parameters do I need and how do you fill the value fields ?
{I tried (1,100), believing this selects all items with days in arrears between 1 and 100 days, or deselects if you fill exclude values}
{I also tried field Days net [BSEG-ZBD3T] but don't know how to fill the values}
Thanx in advance -
Run F110 Payment Proposal in Custom Z Report
Hi Folks,
I have a requirement to run payment proposal part of the F110 transaction from a Z program without having to create a payment proposal.
It's a little tricky to explain so I will try to say it in these terms:
My desired output is the "Display Payment Proposal: Payments" table that can be viewed by clicking Display Proposal button in F110.
My desired input is Company Code, Pament Methods, Next Payment Date and the list of Vendors (i.e. the values that are entered when creating the payment parameters.)
So, is this achieve able without going through tons of F110 code to replicate the functionality.
Many thanks for any help,
ColmI created a function module to do the work. Hopefully somone finds it useful
FUNCTION z_run_dummy_pay_proposal.
*"*"Local Interface:
*" IMPORTING
*" REFERENCE(I_LAUFD) TYPE F110V-LAUFD
*" REFERENCE(I_ZWELS) TYPE F110V-ZWELS
*" REFERENCE(I_NEDAT) TYPE F110V-NEDAT
*" REFERENCE(I_LAUFI) TYPE F110V-LAUFI
*" EXPORTING
*" REFERENCE(EXCEPTION) TYPE CHAR255
*" CHANGING
*" REFERENCE(T_LIFNR) TYPE ZTT_LIFNR
*" REFERENCE(T_BUKRS) TYPE ZTT_BUKRS
*" REFERENCE(T_REGUH) TYPE ZTT_REGUH
*" REFERENCE(T_REGUP) TYPE ZTT_REGUP
*" REFERENCE(T_BSIK) TYPE ZTT_BSIK
DATA: ls_rfdt TYPE rfdt, "Cluster Table that stores the Payment Parameters
lv_seconds TYPE i, "Seconds used to control the wait time
ls_lifnr TYPE lifnr,
ls_bukrs TYPE bukrs.
*RFTD table is the parameter cluster table for F110 amoung others
CONSTANTS: lc_relid TYPE rfdt-relid VALUE 'FB', "CHAR02 data element for SYST from RFDT table
lc_parm TYPE c LENGTH 4 VALUE 'PARM', "Constant value to pass into the RFDT table
lc_f110 TYPE c LENGTH 4 VALUE 'F110'. "Constant value to pass into the RFDT table
*The values are needed to store the parameters correctly in the Parameter Cluster Table
f110v-laufd = i_laufd.
f110v-laufi = i_laufi.
f110c-budat = i_laufd.
f110c-grdat = i_laufd.
rfdt-mandt = sy-mandt.
rfdt-relid = lc_relid.
CONCATENATE lc_f110 i_laufd i_laufi lc_parm INTO rfdt-srtfd.
f110id-progr = lc_f110.
f110id-laufd = i_laufd.
f110id-laufi = i_laufi.
f110id-objkt = lc_parm.
*Build up the Vendors that are being stored in the parameters
LOOP AT t_lifnr INTO ls_lifnr.
r_lifnr-sign = 'I'.
r_lifnr-option = 'EQ'.
r_lifnr-low = ls_lifnr.
APPEND r_lifnr.
ENDLOOP.
*Build up the Company Codes that are being stored in the parameters
LOOP AT t_bukrs INTO ls_bukrs.
fkttab-bugrp = sy-tabix.
fkttab-zwels = i_zwels.
fkttab-nedat = i_nedat.
fkttab-bukls = ls_bukrs.
fkttab-xpruf = 'X'.
*To match the SAP standard I put in 6 blank lines
APPEND fkttab.
CLEAR fkttab.
APPEND fkttab.
CLEAR fkttab.
APPEND fkttab.
CLEAR fkttab.
APPEND fkttab.
CLEAR fkttab.
APPEND fkttab.
CLEAR fkttab.
APPEND fkttab.
CLEAR fkttab.
APPEND fkttab.
ENDLOOP.
LOOP AT fkttab WHERE bugrp IS NOT INITIAL.
buktab-bukrs = fkttab-bukls.
buktab-bugrp = fkttab-bugrp.
SELECT SINGLE land1
FROM t001
INTO buktab-land1
WHERE bukrs = fkttab-bukls.
SELECT SINGLE zbukr
FROM t042
INTO buktab-zbukr
WHERE bukrs = fkttab-bukls.
APPEND buktab.
ENDLOOP.
*Use the SAP standard to format the Vendors
PERFORM selektion_lifnr.
*Create the Payment Parameters
PERFORM sichern.
*Commit the work and wait for the Payment Parameters to be written to the database
COMMIT WORK AND WAIT.
*Wait up to 4 minutes for the Payment Parameters to be created, if they aren't after
*4 minutes raise an exception
CLEAR lv_seconds.
DO 240 TIMES.
SELECT SINGLE *
FROM rfdt
INTO ls_rfdt
WHERE relid = lc_relid
AND srtfd = rfdt-srtfd.
IF sy-subrc = 0.
EXIT.
ELSE.
WAIT UP TO 1 SECONDS.
lv_seconds = lv_seconds + 1.
IF lv_seconds = 240.
exception = 'parameter_create_failed'. "Old and new exceptions cannot be used at the same time
EXIT.
ENDIF.
ENDIF.
ENDDO.
*Once the payment parameters have been created we can create a payment proposal
CALL FUNCTION 'SCHEDULE_PAYMENT_PROPOSAL'
EXPORTING
i_laufd = i_laufd
i_laufi = i_laufi
i_xstrf = 'X' "Create immediatly
EXCEPTIONS
startdate_wrong = 1
parameters_missed = 2
lock_failed = 3
job_open_failed = 4
job_close_failed = 5
OTHERS = 6.
IF sy-subrc <> 0.
exception = 'proposal_create_failed'. "Old and new exceptions cannot be used at the same time
ENDIF.
*Trigger the Job
COMMIT WORK AND WAIT.
*Clear out the tables that are used to store the cluster table
*values for the parameters
REFRESH: buktab, fkttab, slktab, sldtab, trctab, usrtab,
faetab, jobtab.
CLEAR: buktab, fkttab, slktab, sldtab, trctab, usrtab,
faetab, jobtab, f110c, trcopt, f110versionpar.
*Import the Payment Parameters Values
IMPORT buktab fkttab slktab sldtab trctab usrtab
faetab jobtab f110c trcopt f110versionpar
FROM DATABASE rfdt(fb) ID f110id.
*Check to see has the job finished
CLEAR lv_seconds.
DO 240 TIMES.
READ TABLE jobtab INDEX 1.
SELECT SINGLE *
FROM tbtco
WHERE jobname = jobtab-jobname
AND jobcount = jobtab-jobcount
AND status = 'F'.
IF sy-subrc = 0.
EXIT.
ELSE.
WAIT UP TO 1 SECONDS.
lv_seconds = lv_seconds + 1.
IF lv_seconds = 240.
exception = 'proposal_create_failed'. "Old and new exceptions cannot be used at the same time
EXIT.
ENDIF.
ENDIF.
ENDDO.
*Store the Payment Proposal Header Values
SELECT *
FROM reguh
INTO TABLE t_reguh
WHERE laufd = i_laufd
AND laufi = i_laufi.
*Delete the values where no payment will be made
DELETE t_reguh WHERE vblnr IS INITIAL.
*Store the Payment Proposal Line Item Values
SELECT *
FROM regup
INTO TABLE t_regup
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN t_reguh
WHERE laufd = t_reguh-laufd
AND laufi = t_reguh-laufi
AND xvorl = t_reguh-xvorl
AND zbukr = t_reguh-zbukr
AND lifnr = t_reguh-lifnr
AND kunnr = t_reguh-kunnr
AND empfg = t_reguh-empfg
AND vblnr = t_reguh-vblnr.
*Get the relevant Outstanding Payment to Vendors Values
SELECT *
FROM bsik
INTO TABLE t_bsik
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN t_regup
WHERE bukrs = t_regup-bukrs
AND lifnr = t_regup-lifnr
AND umsks = t_regup-umsks
AND umskz = t_regup-umskz
AND zuonr = t_regup-zuonr
AND gjahr = t_regup-gjahr
AND belnr = t_regup-belnr
AND buzei = t_regup-buzei.
*Delete the Payment Proposal
CALL FUNCTION 'DELETE_PAYMENT_PROPOSAL'
EXPORTING
date = i_laufd
identification = i_laufi
EXCEPTIONS
abnormal_end = 1
no_delete_authority = 2
OTHERS = 3.
IF sy-subrc <> 0.
exception = 'proposal_delete_failed'. "Old and new exceptions cannot be used at the same time
ENDIF.
*Delete the Payment Parameters
CALL FUNCTION 'DELETE_PAYMENT_PARAMETERS'
EXPORTING
i_laufd = i_laufd
i_laufi = i_laufi
i_inter = space
EXCEPTIONS
no_authority = 1
parameters_missed = 2
wrong_status = 3
OTHERS = 4.
IF sy-subrc <> 0.
exception = 'parameter_delete_failed'. "Old and new exceptions cannot be used at the same time
ENDIF.
ENDFUNCTION.
Edited by: Colm Gavin on Apr 15, 2011 12:22 PM -
Like ot change the View of F110 (Payment proposal)
Hi
The veiw of the payment proposal using Tcode F110 is stamdatd as attached. and i would like to change this like as ALV Grid ..Please suggest how can i change the same.Hello,
In O7FB you can define the fields that can be used to sort the payment proposal payment.
You can define a default layout to be used in the Display/Edit Payment Proposal, and then in F110 specify the sort sequence once thelist is displayed.
FAKP > Periodic Processing > Payment autom.pmnts > Line Layout
FAKP > Periodic Processing > Payment autom.pmnts > Default values >
and for transaction FBZ0 select the defined Layout
From release 5.0 the payment proposal processing was changed to the ALV. With this tool the line structure is determined - as in all ALV lists -within the application. During the use of the ALV the "old" Customizing settings are obsolete. Hence in your case with ALV option, the Proposal -> edit -> Settings -> Line Layout is greyed out. The note number 617492 is useful to understand this new funcionality.
As an alternative also I would suggest you to use proposal list , program RFZALI20.
I hope this helps.
Oscar -
F110 Payment Proposal multiple payment lines for same vendor
Hello,
Question for the FI community regarding single payments for multiple invoices for the same vendor. Is there any other place that would dictate the grouping (or non grouping) of multiple payment proposal lines for same vendor payment?
I understand that there are two places:
FBZP - Change view 'Maintenance of Company Code Data for a Payment Method", the flag for 'Single payment for marked item'
Vendor Master - Automatic payment transactions, flag for 'Individual pmnt'
Is there anywhere else where this may be dictated? At my location, we have two company codes that make ACH payments, settings for FBZP (Single payment for marked item flag) and selected vendor for payment in the vendor master is identical. I get different results when viewing the payment proposal for each company code. Company Code A parses out individual line items for payment in the proposal, and Company Code B does not. When I change the flag via FBZP for Company Code A, this resolves the issue. When I make the same change for Company Code B, there is no change.
In all of my testing, I have left the 'Individual pmnt' flag for both vendor masters unchecked.
I'm hoping that somebody in the community here would be able to point me in the right direction to understand why I am getting differences. Is there somewhere else that I can check?
Thanks everyone.Ravi,
Thanks for your reply, however in my post I already mentioned I have tested out both options via FBZP as well as the vendor master. You are correct, in only one case regarding my situation.
In my example for Company Code B, I have the following scenarios:
1. FBZP - single payment for marked item checked, Vendor individual payment option not checked, result is a single payment item for multiple invoices
2. FBZP - single payment for marked item checked, Vendor individual payment option is checked, result is multiple payment items for each invoice
3. FBZP - single payment for marked item not checked, Vendor individual payment option not checked, result is a single payment item for multiple invoices
4. FBZP - single payment for marked item not checked, Vendor individual payment option is checked, result is a multiple payment items for each invoice
Are you saying that the option in FBZP simply enables the grouping/non grouping based on what the vendor master record payment option is? Typically, that option for vendors is not checked in either of our company codes, therefore if the only difference is the setting in FBZP, then why would I be getting only a single payment for multiple invoices in the case of scenario 1 listed above?
That's why I am wondering if perhaps there is something elsewhere than FBZP and vendor master settings that could be affecting this.
Comments please? -
F110-Payment Proposal Creator in SAP Tables
Is it possible to find out which user has created a payment proposal through SAP tables?
Hello Chitntan, Thank You for Your reply,
REGUA isn't helpful in my case
because it tracks proposals that has been edited only.
I need to find out the creator for all payment proposals.
Hope for additional ideas.
Edited by: ZARA99 on Nov 21, 2009 8:39 AM -
F110- payment proposal didn't pick up item
Hi All,
need your help
User has created a payment proposal and when take a look at the proposal list, one item is missing which was suppose to be a refund to customer.
This customer has 2 documents, only one document didn't get picked up.
Also payment proposal parameter is stated as up to posting date 19.05.09 and this document pertains to 07.05.09. there is no payment block and this payment has mpayment method 'B' which is the same as teh selection criteria.
exception list didn't show this as well..
How to find out why it is not picked up..?
thanks & regards,JayaO,
If the payment is selected in another payment run, and NOT PAID, then the account itself gets blocked and would not be selected in the new payment run.
The concerned table is REGUS - note that this table is at account (vendor / customer) level, and not at open line item level.
Now, onto the primary problem here - why a particular line item is not appearing in the proposal. There could be a variety of reasons, like:
1. whether the said open line item is within the posting date that this payment run is picking up (you say you've already checked this)
2. whether the said open line item has the correct payment method mentioned in it (you say you've checked this as well)
3. whether the said open line item is due BEFORE the date mentioned as your next payment run date (because if, as per the payment terms of the line item, it is becoming due AFTER the date mentioned as the date for next payment run, then SAP will NOT pick up this line item for your current payment proposal).
Let me know how you fare in this last validation.
Thanks
Gulshan -
F110 - Payment proposal parameter
Hi all,
Pls tell me if I have created a payment proposal but not yet run, if I change the parameter, let say, "Posting date" or "Document entered up to date", will this changes get logged? Where can I check for the changes made by whom and when?
Thanks.if you have created the proposal but run is not carried out then u can change the parameters ,if you had saved and created the proposal then first u will have to delete the old proposal then create it again.
thanks
deepa -
Hi
Today after creating a payment proposal list when the user tried to display the proposal list,it is showing all the transaction items of last three years.It should not.It should display only what is created in latest proposal created. I have not changed any config on AP. Can some one help me why proposal list is showing all the old cases ?
Thanks
SatyaHi,
In your case U have described that in the proposal list all the line item pertaining to last year U are getting the list, that means u have open line items of last three year, try to close those open items of last three years, and then try to create the new payment run and check. I think it will work because as mentioned by U that U have not changes any confonfiguration.
Regards,
Venkat. -
F110 Payment Run - BTE / Exits
Hi ABAP Gurus,
Good day.
Currently, our Direct Debit Collection file is being created via Transaction F110 during Payment Run. Basically, the Direct Debit file is being uploaded in AL11 after the Payment Run Transaction F110.
Please be informed that in the Printout / Data Medium tab of the F110, two programs are present:
(1) RFFOAVIS_FPAYM
(2) RFFOEDI1
Now, my requirement is to add the u201CPayers Nameu201D after every line item in the file.
Now this is my question:
Can you kindly advise the BTE or User Exits that I can use for this certain enhancement?
Thank you very much!
Best regards.
Brandopls be more precise with your request - there're many events as you see in trx. BF44
A.
Message was edited by: Andreas Mann -
Payment Proposal BTE/User Exits
Hi All,
My requirement is to Trigger Workflow in F110. Also I am new to F110.
Requirement is like this.
In F110, as first we are filling Parameters and Saving. After this we are Sceduling Proposal for these Parameters.
Ok. now once the Proposal has created, here I need to Trigger Workflow.
I found some BTE like 00002110, still testing them.
Please let me know which BTE/Use Exit shall I use or is there some other was to Trigger Custom Workllow here?
Regards,
RishiHi,
one point is open FI (TA FIBF and BF34)
-> process 1610 - 2060
look here:
<a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/EN/cb/4104aadf2b11d3a550444553540000/frameset.htm">Data Medium Exchange Engine</a>
regards Andreas -
Open Items run (F110 payment proposal)
Hi All,
Can someone please help me with a problem that I am facing when running F110.
We pay our vendors through F110 but also we have customers who we need to issue dividend equity check and their loan payout's. So when I do FB75 and create a credit note for customer and than I go FBL5N I see it there with other open invoices. Than I go to F110 and do a payment run and it creates a check for the difference. I don't want that to happen, I want the check issued for the credit amount that I posted in FB75. Is there any way I can print checks for the credit memos only and not mess with the customer open invoices. Please help if you know how to fix this problem. Thank you in advance for your help.
Happy Holidays!
MonikaYou have a couple of options (select whichever is possible for your current system config):
First, you can specify different payment methods in cust. invoices and cust. credit memos. Then, in F110, specify only the cust. credit memo payment method, and the system should pick up only the credit memos.
Secondly, if the payment methods can't be different for both the document types, and if there are not too many invoices open, you can block all the open invoices. This way, F110 will not process the invoices with the credit memos.
Thirdly, there is a checkbox in the cust. master data (Company Code Data - Payment transactions) named "Single payment". Place your cursor on it, and hit <F1>. SAP says that "If this indicator is set, every customer/vendor open item is paid separately during automatic payment transactions. This means that open items are not grouped together for payment."
Fourthly, you can define Payment Groupings (T.Code OBAP).
IMG path Fin. Acctg. --> AR and AP --> Buss. Trans. --> Outgoing Payments --> Autom. Outgoing Payments --> Payment Method / Bank Selection for Payment Prog. --> Define Payment Groupings.
You can then specify these groupings in the cust. master screen (Company Code Data - Payment transactions) using field "Grouping Key".
Remember to assign points if found useful.
Regards,
Gulshan
Maybe you are looking for
-
Extending the desk top, adding a second monitor/screen
Hi, I bought an Apple Mini-DVI to VGA adapter that allows me to plug my 20" vga monitor into my imac so that I can have more screen space. I had hoped to be able to drag files over to the 20" screen. That works, but when plugged into my imac, the 20"
-
Mac Pro network freezes on wake from sleep
This problem has been growing over the past few weeks. It involves symptoms similar to other postings, but as of yet I have not found a common answer. If my machine is running well and I reboot, boot times are slower than previous but not unreasonabl
-
Do I need to backup my Mac?
I have a Macbook Pro Retina and i've just discovered a small chip in my screen. Since it's still under warranty I'm going to get the screen repaired. Do I need to back it up? I don't have any way of backing it up so before I go out and buy an externa
-
Thank you for scamming my Grandma and lying to me Verizon.
I recived the cool little upgrade your phone and recive a $100 GIFT CARD!!! It was sent to my number and mine alone, despite I had upgraded to a BB 8 months before. So my grandma decided to get into the world of smartphones. From my expirence BestBuy
-
When reversing speed on clip back to 100% my sound does not change
I speed up a section of video clip to 150% but when I converted it back to 100% the sound stayed at 150%. Why is this? Also is it easy to separate sound tracks from video tracks? Sorry I am new to FCP and have lots to learn.