F110 Payment run have been cancelled
Hi all expert,
When i want to do payment to vendor, the proposal is created.
But show message 'Payment run have been cancelld'.
So at this moment, i can't do anything to do the payment.
I can't make another proposal and payment run for the vendor.
Some one please help me.
Thanks
This is my payment job log,
08.10.2008 17:10:18 Job started
08.10.2008 17:10:18 Step 001 started (program SAPF110S, variant 0000000010756, user ID: ACC-USER)
08.10.2008 17:10:18 Log for payment run for payment on 10.10.2008, identification B1010
08.10.2008 17:10:27 ABAP/4 processor: DBIF_RSQL_INVALID_REQUEST 00 671 A
08.10.2008 17:10:27 Job cancelled 00 518 A
Can everyone explain to me why my payment run will cancelled with this error?
Thanks
Similar Messages
-
Payment run has been cancelled F110
Hi Experts,
Would like to ask possible reasons the following status is displayed in F110.
"Parameters have been entered
Payment proposal has been created
Payment proposal has been edited
Payment run has been cancelled
Posting orders: (X-1) generated, (X) completed."
Why does posting/payment were still created even if it is stated that "Payment run has been cancelled". What are possible reasons the payment run was cancelled.
Thank you very much in advance.Hi,
With reference to the belowstatus which you have provided,
"Parameters have been entered
Payment proposal has been created
Payment proposal has been edited
Payment run has been cancelled
Posting orders: (X-1) generated, (X) completed."
Once you edited the Payment Proposal, then sytem displays a message Payment proposal has been edited
After that only you have cancelled the Payment Proposal, then sytem displays a message Payment run has been cancelled
Once you cancelled the Payment run system won't generate any posting orders.
Please try to replicate the same once again, you won't get this again.
Thanks
Chandra -
Payment run has been cancelled
Hi Experts,
We have a problem in Payment Run. In proposal there are 154 line items are ready for payment (status is Green). But once we did the payment run the status is Posting orders: 109 generated, 109 completed and Payment run has been cancelled.
There are 154 vendors in this payment run. But the payment has been done only for first 109 vendors and the remaining vendors are not included in the payment.
Please suggest what could be the reason.
Regards,
HavinaHi Havina,
The reasons could be galore.
The open invoice items may not be due or overdue for payment.
Depending on the next run date, APP might have not picked the open items for payment.
The open item might have been blocked for payment.
The vendor master record itself might have a payment block.
Depending on the case to case you need to analyse.
Hope this helps you....
Regards,
Sreekanth.... -
F110 - Payment Run has been released error
Hi,
When we are executing payment run F110, after parameter entered & payment proposal is created it gives an message payment run has been released without
payment proposal edited & payment run carried out.
pl. help me in this regard.
thank u
regards
santoshhi Chenu,
thanks for reponse immediately, can u kindly tell in detail why it will go to released state and how to overcome this problem, it happen occassionally not regularly.
thank u
regards
santosh -
F110 Payment run stopped, status Payment run has been carried out.
Hi experts,
I have searched in this forum but didn't find suitable scenario.
I have run automatic payment after the proposal created.
Somehow the payment run status stopped at "Payment run has been carried out".
Then I check the payment run log:
Job started
Step 001 started (program SAPF110S, variant &0000000007737, user name xxxxxx)
Log for payment run for payment on xx.xx.2009, identification XXxxx
System error occurred during blocking attempt; payment run stopped
... the execution of the payment program is terminated
End of log
Job finished
I thought no accounting document has been posted.
Is it the right way if I re-run the program SAPF110S with its variant?
What is the possible impact.
Kindly advise.
regards,
robHi,
Yes there might be no accounting document has been posted because even though the payment run has been carried out but parameters you have mentioned might not been selected because of many reasons.
Please go to EDIT - Payment -
Payment list and exception list.......
Please check if any entry is there in payment list if it is than some doc has been posted.
Rest will go to EXCEPTION list.... will show you the exact errors.
Please check the same in the proposal run first... it seems that PROPOSAL run in not only correct.
See the error and correct it. -
In f110, the DMEs for different payment documents have been combined
Hi,
In f110, the DMEs for different payment documents have been combined.
Two DMEs are created but they are not in separate lines.
Kindly help.
ThanksContd ....
Example 2 - the following is an example of multiple payment documents against each invoice
FH 13062008T1.001 13/06/2008 14:22:27 #
H 10000002 13/06/2008 HSP04 NEFT-S 002-434132-908 INR INR ABNBK A.B.ENTERPRISE 999999
L 10000002 13/06/2008 HSP04 NEFT-S 1900007628 NM 4000.00 4000.00
H 20000003 13/06/2008 HSP04 TRFR-S 002-434132-908 INR INR ABNBK A.B.ENTERPRISE 999999
L 20000003 13/06/2008 HSP04 TRFR-S 1900007629 NM 5000.00 5000.00
H 30000003 13/06/2008 HSP04 RTGS-S 002-434132-908 INR INR ABNBK A.B.ENTERPRISE 999999
L 30000003 13/06/2008 HSP04 RTGS-S 1900007630 NM 6000.00 6000.00
Z ZOF #
Example 3 - This is one payment document against multiple invoices
FH 14032008.001 14/03/2008 10:11:49 #
H 700013 14/03/2008 HSP01 TRFR 072020779001 INR INR HSP01 Srinivas 464646 154 Ba
L 700013 14/03/2008 HSP01 TRFR 0100000836 NM 200000.00 200000.00
L 700013 14/03/2008 HSP01 TRFR 0100082351 NM 100.00 100.00
L 700013 14/03/2008 HSP01 TRFR 1900106433 NM 10000.00 10000.00
L 700013 14/03/2008 HSP01 TRFR 1900106552 NM 25000.00 25000.00
L 700013 14/03/2008 HSP01 TRFR 1900106613 NM 120000.00 120000.00
L 700013 14/03/2008 HSP01 TRFR 1900106617 NM 120000.00 120000.00
L 700013 14/03/2008 HSP01 TRFR 1900106620 NM 120000.00 120000.00
L 700013 14/03/2008 HSP01 TRFR 1900106621 NM 120000.00 120000.00
L 700013 14/03/2008 HSP01 TRFR 1900106622 NM 12000.00 12000.00
L 700013 14/03/2008 HSP01 TRFR 1900106677 NM 50000.00 50000.00
L 700013 14/03/2008 HSP01 TRFR 1900106701 NM 1000.00 1000.00
Z ZOF #
Hope this helps.
Thanks and Regards,
Anit
Edited by: Anit Mangat on Aug 6, 2009 11:41 AM -
F110 APP run - Payment run has been scheduled, but job was not released
Dear Friends,
We have made payment parameters, payment proposal, edit payment proposal and it was working fine upto that stage.
Parameters have been entered
Payment proposal has been created
Payment proposal has been edited
But when we selected payment run, immediately it showed the below status:
Payment run has been scheduled 17.01.08 12:59:55
Job was not released
Also I'm not able to delete the Payment run made, fields are in disabled mode.
Please guide me how to resolve this issue.
Thanks in advance for your help.
Regards,
Dwarak.Dear Supriya,
Thanks a lot for your immediate response.
Still the same problem is existing even after one and half hours.
ie.,
Payment run has been scheduled 17.01.08 12:59:55
Job was not released
Could you please let me know which Tcode we have to go to release this inorder to solve this issue.
As it is in the production client, it would be really helpful if you could let me know the details at the earliest.
Thanks again.
Regards,
Dwarak. -
Problem In F110 with status message " Payment run has been released "
Dear Friends,
We have an Strange issue in payment program...
While executing the payment program they got below Status Messages
Parameters have been entered
Payment proposal has been created
Payment proposal has been edited
*Payment run has been released 13.05.08 15:42:58
Program ends up without single payment....While trying to Delete the Proposal or Payment those selection are in grey color (Deactivated Mode) ...
With same parametrs we have tried to run another payment run but there is no proposals selected...
Question :
1) How can I delete 1st Payment Run Proposal as well as Payment ID's
Could you please Advise Neccessary actions which is required for solving the issue...
Thanks in Advance
Regards
Suresh PolineniYou can delete the payment run proposal in the following sequence
1) first delete the output file
Edit-Payments-Delete output
2) delete the proposal file
Edit-proposal -Delete
3) if u want delete the parameters also in the similar way.
for digging the problem why the payments are not happened, just check the exceptionals list then u can easily catch the error point.
I hope it will provide some clue to clear your problems.
Regards
Madhav -
Duplicate payments in Payment list of F110 payment run
Hello all,
We had run APP trhu F110 payment run was as expected with amount 100000 EUR but when we checked payment list (EDIT- Payment - Payment list) there are duplicate entries and total is showing as 200000 EUR.
Following are onservations
1) In SAP posting made correctly to all vendors with a total of 100000 EUR. So no double payments posted in vendor account
2) Payment list is showing amounts with a doument numbers. Duplicate payments also having document numbers but which are not exists in SAP
3) Documents posted with doc type ZP in sap is not in serial i.e 1,2,3,4 Its posted like 1,3,5,7... the document no 2,4 can be seen in the payment list
4) Also I checked log for the payment run and I found one warning message as "Check whether a duplicate payment medium has been created"
5) Also status of payment run is "Posting orders: 1,174 generated, 605 completed"
6) I also checked setting in FBZP which is also correct
We need to correct the DME file with correect postings
If anyone has faced issue then please share your inputs
Thanks & regardsDear Rajan,
the payment document validation works as follows:
If you select this parameter, a form is only printed if the related
payment document has already been posted.
Note that it is not advisable to schedule the payment program and the
data medium programs to run at the same time, if you want the system to
be able to carry out validation of the payment documents - because the
system does not start posting the documents at the same time as the
program runs, and in order to ensure that the payment program generally
finishes its run before all the payment documents have been posted, the
payment medium program (started after the payment program) would display
in the error list any documents that have not (yet) been found.
As a result double payments are not possible as no payment media is
created if the payment document is not posted. The items are still
open and are selected in the next payment run again.
If the payment document validation is not used, the payment media is
created but the open item is not cleared as the payment document is
not posted. In this case you have to clear the open items manually
(if a repeat update is not possible) to avoid double payments.
dear Prashant,
It is normal that if the automatic payment does not pay all the items, You can find them hanging into sm13.
However, in general, when this happens you could try to use the edit >
payments > after termination > draw up again option, if it is
available. If there is an entry in SM13, as in Your case, you should process it.
But sometimes the System does not allow to do it.
Anyway the only problem I can see is the one reported by the note 545340:
When the payment program is terminated, it may be the case that not all
payment documents exist on the updated database while the entries
already exist in the tables REGUH and REGUP. However, this basic
procedure has the advantage that the payment media can already be
created for the purpose of fast forwarding to the bank when for example
the payment documents update is delayed.
For this problem please refer to the Note 545340 point [4]
that answers to it.
Furthermore please be aware that:
as I told You in the beginning, If the payment program does not pay
all the invoices contained into the payment proposal, It will depend on
the fact that during the payment proposal run time and the payment
proposal time, something changed respect one of the selected invoices.
This means that one document number was NOT posted even if It is
contained in the tables REGUH and REGUP.
Please be informed payment data tables REGU* are used by only payment
program and no need to take any corrective action and should not be a
problem with auditors.
So You can pay the invoices manually or by the next automatic payment
run without any problem.
I hope now the System behaviour is more clear.
Mauri -
Hio there Gurus
When am running f110 status showing Parameters have been entered, Payment proposal has been created, Payment run has been carried out and vendor line items have been cleared. However, there is a shortage in the amount of money that the vendor recieved. i've checked the following:
1. PO amount - no errors
2. Goods recieved - no errors
3. Involves - no errors
4. vendor line items - cleared for the correct amount
please help as i do not know where the problem lies.thanks.Hi,
Since you have already done the payment run, go to F110 and select the payment tab. You will get the job name for the payment run. Double click on the line and it will take you to the entries made.
Alternatively, you can run FBL1N report for the vendor and view the payment entry for the vendor. Double click on the line and go to the document overview.
In both the above cases, you will know from the accounting entry if any deduction has ben made at the time of F110.
Please revert for any clarification.
Thanks and Regards,
Anit -
I am having a problem with F110 Payment run. It's showing the error as: 'Item cannot be paid due to inconsistent withholding tax'. I have done the payment run for the same vendor, same company code and it worked well. Later, I deleted one of the WH Tax type in Vendor Master. Has anyone come across this or similar issue?. What can I do to solve this?.
hi,
I am not able to see the Deleted WH Tax info. when I run the RFWT0010. I tried to do the payment run after executing RFWT0010, but am not able to resolve the problem. I have run the S_P00_07000134(the 1099 report) a few days back(before posting the new Invoices). Do you think this has anything to do with the existing problem. And I have checked the config. again for the tax type, Tax codes and their assignments to Co.Cd. which everything seems to be correct. I tried to pay using f-53 which is showing the same error.
As Hein said i tried to look in the Invoice doc. for the WHTax info.(I have the setting to do calculate the WHTax amount @ the Payment level). So, its not possible to delete the Tax code and make the settings in VM.
As per suresh, I have checked the validity of the tax code its(1/1/2000-12/31/9999). And the tax type, tax code are assigned in the VMR.
I am not able to resolve this. Has anyone come across the same/similar issue and resolved it?. -
System shut down during F110 payment run
During the F110 payment run, the PRD system shut down. There were 259 items in the proposal and according to the status 42 posting orders were generated and completed. What is the process to handle this problem? Can the payment run be re-started?
It appears that clearing documents were created for some open items before the system shut down but no checks are showing in the check register. Has this happened to anyone before and what steps should be taken to resolve this?Is it a matter of...
1. deleting the output of the payment run,
2. deleting the proposal
3. canceling the the payment check by check using FCH8 if any occurred
4. reseting and reversing the clearing documents created using FBRA before the system shut down
5. start a new payment run -
Dear All,
We have a scenario where clients is having five plants under one legal entity.
Client wants F110 payment run separately for all vendor invoices specific to the plant.
For all plants , there are separate bank accounts and respective invoice must go to plant specific bank account as this is legal requirement of the country.
Could you please let me know configuration steps to manage this scenario.
Also can you let us know, how can we make payment to selected Vendors in F110 ( additional field tab).
In paramater tab,we have the option to incorporate the selected vendor codes.
In additional field tab,we have only 3 row with a range of Vendor codes.
Now i want to make payment to 50 vendors(specific to one plant) the vendor codes are 001,18,58,193,etc......how can we do this while we run the payment program.
Do suggest
RegardsWhen you are posting an invoice, some field in the invoice document must have plant information. Based on that you can substitute the House Bank. Lets say for example, You enter the value "Plant1" in the Assignment field of the vendor invoice. and you want to pay Plant1 invoices through house Bank HBK01. Then your should create a substitution rule saying if the value in say assignment field is "Plant1" then substitute House Bank field in the vendor line with value HBK01. If you are using a dedicated vendor number ranges specific to plant, then you can do the house bank substitution based on vendor ID as well, and then you don't have to enter Plant info in the invoice.
Then all the invoices will have right house bank data. Now to make sure that you are paying to vendor posting specific to a plant in the payment run. You can go to FREE SELECTION tab of payment run(F110) when you enter parameters, and in the drop down under field name double click others option and select the document and enter. and then select and enter the field that you are using to enter plant information. In my example I have used Assignment field to enter plant information. So, I will select BSEG-ZUONR. Then I will go to Values field and enter "Plant1". Then Payment run will pick up only "Plant1" invoices.
If you already using some rules to enter the house bank in the invoice, then you might not want to use the substitution rule. But find out which field in the vendor invoice has plant infomation, and select that field as i have shown above though FREE SELECTION.
Thanks
ROn -
I have the partner profile setup for F110 Payment run.
I have added the message types : REMADV for the basic type PEXR2002.
I also have added : PAYEXT for PEXR2002.
The Payment run generates the Idoc successfully. PAYEXE IDoc is generated.
I want to actually generate REMADV Idoc as per my functional requirement.
Question:
1. Whats the difference if Both are pointing to same Basic Type - PEXR2002 ?
2. What should I do to generate REMADV and Not PAYEXT?
3. Any configuration that decides the idoc type?
FYI - The payment method configured for all this is "E" - BACS Payment.
Any help would be appretiated.
PranaliHi ,
check this blog http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/a00afa41-4254-2d10-74a5-bd560edf74da?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true
IDOC Configuration steps for EDI
IDOC Information
IDOC type: PEXR2002
Message type: REMADV
Function Module: IDOC_INPUT_REMADV_CTR
Process code: REMC
Process
When an inbound Payment advice is received, it will create a payment and clearing AR document with the document type set up in the config below.
Config
Define posting rule in SPRO->FI->Bank accounting ->Business Transactions ->Payment transactions ->manual bank statement->define posting keys and posting rules
Assign company code to EDI payments in SPRO->FI->AR and AP ->Bus Transactons->Incoming Payments->Electronic->Payment Advice Notes->Assign company codes for EDI payment advice notes.
Define Payment advice type 06 in SPRO->FI->AR and AP ->Bus Transactons->Incoming Payments->Electronic->Payment Advice Notes->Define Further processing with account type D.
Prabhudas -
F110 payment run - split on invoice line item that exceed certain amount
Dear expert,
Now i want to ask is there any ways to configure F110 - payment run to auto checking on whenever the amount of one fi document is more than USD100,000 will auto split to second payment item.
*i have already tick individual pmnt on tcode FK02 - change vendor master data (at automatic payment transactions column). This method will split all fi document under same vendor post with different posting document number.
I would like to ask is there any way to configure auto split on the fi document (if the document is exceed some amount) for payment run.
thanks and appreciatei have put distribution amount.
Let say i put distribution amount USD100, after i run payment run, one account payable document will generate one payment document.
As what i want is- if the ap document is USD 200, then the payment document will generate two payment document.
Coz my enquiry is if the payment is excedd USD100 we need to assign to another tt payment as the TT is only accept maximum USD100 transfer.
Expert, please advice on ur view.
Thanks and appreciate much on ur previous help.
regards,
Ng Chong Chuan
Maybe you are looking for
-
BAPI for creation of subcontract PO
Hi all, Currently iam doing a BAPI for creation of subcontract Purchase Order using the BAPI_PO_CREATE1. But in this BAPI iam unable to find the table for entering Components. Regards, Sun.
-
WRT54G-Need to reconnect every day / firmware question
So each day my router stops connecting to the internet. I go through the same troubleshooting wizard, and each time all I do is unplug and plug back in the router as per it's directions. While this works, I don't want to do it every day. I'm trying t
-
Out of memory error in java- flex communication using RTMP
We are using flex and java in our application. due to RTMP call to fetch data every 5 seconds. it is hiting database and establishing connection and keeps it open hence this is causing for Out of memory issue. Can come one help on this issue.
-
[SOLVED] Urxvt + Inconsolata Displaying UTF-8 Characters Incorrectly
I use the Inconsolata font with urxvt and have noticed that some characters are displayed improperly. For example, an "en dash" (U+2013) appears as a capital N with a tilde over it. It appears that this is because Inconsolata doesn't support anything
-
Getting direct access to Internet is sporadic.
When I get the "Firefox cannot find this site" screen -- or words to that effect -- if I 1) highlight the address, 2) click enter, and then 3) click on "Try again," I can usually then connect. Sometimes I have to do this twice. Once in a while, it do