F110 Payment Run Idoc

I have the partner profile setup for F110 Payment run.
I have added the message types : REMADV for the basic type PEXR2002.
I also have added : PAYEXT for PEXR2002.
The Payment run generates the Idoc successfully. PAYEXE IDoc is generated.
I want to actually generate REMADV Idoc as per my functional requirement.
Question:
1. Whats the difference if Both are pointing to same Basic Type - PEXR2002 ?
2. What should I do to generate REMADV and Not PAYEXT?
3. Any configuration that decides the idoc type?
FYI - The payment method configured for all this is "E" - BACS Payment.
Any help would be appretiated.
Pranali

Hi ,
check this blog  http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/a00afa41-4254-2d10-74a5-bd560edf74da?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true
IDOC Configuration steps for EDI
IDOC Information
IDOC type: PEXR2002
Message type: REMADV
Function Module: IDOC_INPUT_REMADV_CTR
Process code: REMC
Process
When an inbound Payment advice is received, it will create a payment and clearing AR document with the document type set up in the config below.
Config
 Define posting rule in SPRO->FI->Bank accounting ->Business Transactions ->Payment transactions ->manual bank statement->define posting keys and posting rules
 Assign company code to EDI payments in SPRO->FI->AR and AP ->Bus Transactons->Incoming Payments->Electronic->Payment Advice Notes->Assign company codes for EDI payment advice notes.
 Define Payment advice type 06 in SPRO->FI->AR and AP ->Bus Transactons->Incoming Payments->Electronic->Payment Advice Notes->Define Further processing with account type D.
Prabhudas

Similar Messages

  • F110  Payment Run

    I am having a problem with F110 Payment run. It's showing the error as: 'Item cannot be paid due to inconsistent withholding tax'. I have done the payment run for the same vendor, same company code and it worked well. Later, I deleted one of the WH Tax type in Vendor Master. Has anyone come across this or similar issue?. What can I do to solve this?.

    hi,
      I am not able to see the Deleted WH Tax info. when I run the RFWT0010. I tried to do the payment run after executing RFWT0010, but am not able to resolve the problem. I have run the S_P00_07000134(the 1099 report) a few days back(before posting the new Invoices). Do you think this has anything to do with the existing problem. And I have checked the config. again for the tax type, Tax codes and their assignments to Co.Cd. which everything seems to be correct. I tried to pay using f-53 which is showing the same error.
    As Hein said i tried to look in the Invoice doc. for the WHTax info.(I have the setting to do calculate the WHTax amount @ the Payment level). So, its not possible to delete the Tax code and make the settings in VM.
    As per suresh, I have checked the validity of the tax code its(1/1/2000-12/31/9999). And the tax type, tax code are assigned in the VMR.
    I am not able to resolve this. Has anyone come across the same/similar issue and resolved it?.

  • Duplicate payments in Payment list of F110 payment run

    Hello all,
    We had run APP trhu F110 payment run was as expected with amount 100000 EUR but when we checked payment list (EDIT- Payment - Payment list) there are duplicate entries and total is showing as 200000 EUR.
    Following are onservations
    1) In SAP posting made correctly to all vendors with a total of 100000 EUR. So no double payments posted in vendor account 
    2) Payment list is showing amounts with a doument numbers. Duplicate payments also having document numbers but which are not exists in SAP
    3) Documents posted with doc type ZP in sap is not in serial i.e 1,2,3,4 Its posted like 1,3,5,7... the document no 2,4 can be seen in the payment list
    4) Also I checked log for the payment run and I found one warning message as "Check whether a duplicate payment medium has been created"
    5) Also status of payment run is "Posting orders: 1,174 generated, 605 completed"
    6) I also checked setting in FBZP which is also correct
    We need to correct the DME file with correect postings
    If anyone has faced issue then please share your inputs
    Thanks & regards

    Dear Rajan,
    the payment document validation works as follows:
    If you select this parameter, a form is only printed if the related
    payment document has already been posted.
    Note that it is not advisable to schedule the payment program and the
    data medium programs to run at the same time, if you want the system to
    be able to carry out validation of the payment documents - because the
    system does not start posting the documents at the same time as the
    program runs, and in order to ensure that the payment program generally
    finishes its run before all the payment documents have been posted, the
    payment medium program (started after the payment program) would display
    in the error list any documents that have not (yet) been found.
    As a result double payments are not possible as no payment media is
    created if the payment document is not posted. The items are still
    open and are selected in the next payment run again.
    If the payment document validation is not used, the payment media is
    created but the open item is not cleared as the payment document is
    not posted. In this case you have to clear the open items manually
    (if a repeat update is not possible) to avoid double payments.
    dear Prashant,
    It is normal that if the automatic payment does not pay all the items, You can find them hanging into sm13.
    However, in general, when this happens you could try to use the edit >
    payments > after termination > draw up again option, if it is
    available.  If there is an entry in SM13, as in Your case, you should process it.
    But sometimes the System does not allow to do it.
    Anyway the only problem I can see is the one reported by the note 545340:
    When the payment program is terminated, it may be the case that not all
    payment documents exist on the updated database while the entries
    already exist in the tables REGUH and REGUP. However, this basic
    procedure has the advantage that the payment media can already be
    created for the purpose of fast forwarding to the bank when for example
    the payment documents update is delayed.
    For this problem please refer to the Note 545340 point [4]
    that answers to it.
    Furthermore please be aware that:
    as I told You in the beginning, If the payment program does not pay
    all the invoices contained into the payment proposal, It will depend on
    the fact that during the payment proposal run time and the payment
    proposal time, something changed respect one of the selected invoices.
    This means that one document number was NOT posted even if It is
    contained in the tables REGUH and REGUP.
    Please be informed payment data tables REGU* are used by only payment
    program and no need to take any corrective action and should not be a
    problem with auditors.
    So You can pay the invoices manually or by the next automatic payment
    run without any problem.
    I hope now the System behaviour is more clear.
    Mauri

  • System shut down during F110 payment run

    During the F110 payment run, the PRD system shut down. There were 259 items in the proposal and according to the status 42 posting orders were generated and completed. What is the process to handle this problem? Can the payment run be re-started?
    It appears that clearing documents were created for some open items before the system shut down but no checks are showing in the check register. Has this happened to anyone before and what steps should be taken to resolve this?

    Is it a matter of...
    1. deleting the output of the payment run,
    2. deleting the proposal
    3. canceling the the payment check by check using FCH8 if any occurred
    4. reseting and reversing the clearing documents created using FBRA before the system shut down
    5. start a new payment run

  • F110 payment run - Plant wise

    Dear All,
    We have a  scenario where clients is having five plants under one legal entity.
    Client wants F110 payment run  separately for all vendor invoices specific to the plant.
    For all plants , there are separate bank accounts and respective invoice must go to plant specific bank account as this is legal requirement of the country.
    Could you please let me know configuration steps to manage this scenario.
    Also can you let us know, how can we make payment to selected Vendors in F110 ( additional field tab).
    In paramater tab,we have the option to incorporate the selected vendor codes.
    In additional field tab,we have only 3 row with a range of Vendor codes.
    Now i want to make payment to 50 vendors(specific to one plant) the vendor codes are 001,18,58,193,etc......how can we do this  while we run the payment program.
    Do suggest
    Regards

    When you are posting an invoice, some field in the invoice document must have plant information. Based on that you can substitute the House Bank. Lets say for example, You enter the value "Plant1" in the Assignment field of the vendor invoice. and you want to pay Plant1 invoices through house Bank HBK01. Then your should create a substitution rule saying if the value in say assignment field is "Plant1" then substitute House Bank field in the vendor line with value HBK01. If you are using a dedicated vendor number ranges specific to plant, then you can do the house bank substitution based on vendor ID as well, and then you don't have to enter Plant info in the invoice.
    Then all the invoices will have right house bank data. Now to make sure that you are paying to vendor posting specific to a plant in the payment run. You can go to FREE SELECTION tab of payment run(F110) when you enter parameters, and in the drop down under field name double click others option and select the document and enter. and then select and enter the field that you are using to enter plant information. In my example I have used Assignment field to enter plant information. So, I will select BSEG-ZUONR. Then I will go to Values field and enter "Plant1". Then Payment run will pick up only "Plant1" invoices.
    If you already using some rules to enter the house bank in the invoice, then you might not want to use the substitution rule. But find out which field in the vendor invoice has plant infomation, and select that field as i have shown above though FREE SELECTION.
    Thanks
    ROn

  • F110 payment run - split on invoice line item that exceed certain amount

    Dear expert,
    Now i want to ask is there any ways to configure F110 - payment run to auto checking on whenever the amount of one fi document is more than USD100,000 will auto split to second payment item.
    *i have already tick individual pmnt on tcode FK02 - change vendor master data (at automatic payment transactions column). This method will split all fi document under same vendor post with different posting document number.
    I would like to ask is there any way to configure auto split on the fi document (if the document is exceed some amount) for payment run.
    thanks and appreciate

    i have put distribution amount.
    Let say i put distribution amount USD100, after i run payment run, one account payable document will generate one payment document.
    As what i want is- if the ap document is USD 200, then the payment document will generate two payment document.
    Coz my enquiry is if the payment is excedd USD100 we need to assign to another tt payment as the TT is only accept maximum USD100 transfer.
    Expert, please advice on ur view.
    Thanks and appreciate much on ur previous help.
    regards,
    Ng Chong Chuan

  • F110 - payment run program

    Dear All,
    When I run f110 - payment run, does it always create a "Payment Document" ?
    Thanks in advance for your quick reply/.
    Best Regards
    Vijay.

    Hi,
    i think no one of your business partner has payment method
    <b>W</b> in master data or in FI-Document - only <i>T</i>
    you can also take more than 1 payment method (here: <b>TW</b>)
    in your parameters of F110
    A.
    Message was edited by: Andreas Mann

  • Email notification for payments made through F110 payment run

    Hi Gurus,
    I have configured all the settings for the email notification through F110 payment run. I got the email also by using the email field in the address tab.
    My question is the same field is using the sales team to send their customer statements and invoices. So i selected the Contact person tab and maintained the email address.
    But i could not send because the contact person tab is also pointing to the same field for email ( SMTP_ADDR)
    Basically i want to send email for my payment run, without interuptting the email id which is maintained for customer statements.
    Can you please suggest the alternative field to send email apart from address tab ( email field )
    Regards
    Krish

    Hi Krish,
    Please go through posted discussion tread for your needful:
    Re: F110 - Automatic email to vendor when payment run is carried out
    Regards,
    Santoshy

  • How far back is SAP able to keep our F110 Payment Run file (PAYMUL).

    Dear's
    How far back is SAP able to keep our F110 Payment Run file (PAYMUL).
    Will we able to retrieve payment run from a few months/weeks ago ?
    Regards
    Anil

    Anil,
    Yes, you can
    F110 >Payment Run > Overview
    Rgds
    Murali. N

  • How to restrict vendor line items to be picked to 6 in f110 payment run?

    Hai
    how we can allow F110 programme to generate a clearing document for every 6 line items.Means if a vendor has 15 open items which are due for payment at the time of Automatic Payment Run . The System should generate 3 clearing documents. Means the split up should be 663. Means for the first 6 open items (1-6) one clearing document. For next 6 Open items (7-12) and for the last 3 Open Items(13-15) , One clearing Document to be generated.
    Kindly Advice me. Surely Iam going to reward the ponits.
    Thanks In Advance, Have A Great Day
    Akash Narayana

    1)block all doc's where count > 6 (per vendor) and do f110
    2)unlock and repeat 1)
    .. until all doc's are paid
    A.
    Message was edited by:
            Andreas Mann

  • F110 Payment run Problem

    Hi All, I have few doubts in running F110 Transaction,
    1) Is it Time Dependant? I mean to say I schedule Payment run today for 3 vendors and Next Payment run would be 2 days from now i.e on 01/21.
    2)Can I have another Payment run for different Vedors Tomorrow 01/20 and Next Payment run date as 01/21 again? when I try to edit the Proposal it gives ccod xxxx/xxxx do not appear in Proposal xx/xx/xxxx Test-1:Correct
    3) If a vendor is having 3 Line items one is Payable immediately, second is 14 day time and last one is payable in 30 days ,when I choose this Vendor in F110 today, will it take all three lne items payable?because I want to pay him all ,I tried this but system is taking only one Line item why?
    Thank you ,
    Paarthaa,

    Hi Mike Thank you for your Time to reply,I tried to take over 40 day time period as next Payment run date for one Particular Vendor with 3 Line Items having for him, out of Three, two are already over due and one is having 30 day Grace Period ,according to you as I gave 40 day time for next Payrun the system should Pick all 3 Line Items but it is not doing, it is Picking only one Line item  with Least Amount,this time I dont see the error messgage during the Edit Proposal,
    "How can I decide Next Payrun date with out Showing That Error Message during Edit Proposal"? if I am choosing 100 vendors at a time for APPrgram? One thing for sure that error messgae is dependant of Next Payment Run date,
    Thank you ,
    Paarthaa,

  • F110 - PAYMENT RUN ERRORS

    Hio there Gurus
    When am running f110 status showing Parameters have been entered, Payment proposal has been created, Payment run has been carried out and vendor line items have been cleared. However, there is a shortage in the amount of money that the vendor recieved. i've checked the following:
    1. PO amount - no errors
    2. Goods recieved - no errors
    3. Involves - no errors
    4. vendor line items - cleared for the correct amount
    please help as i do not know where the  problem lies.thanks.

    Hi,
    Since you have already done the payment run, go to F110 and select the payment tab. You will get the job name for the payment run. Double click on the line and it will take you to the entries made.
    Alternatively, you can run FBL1N report for the vendor and view the payment entry for the vendor. Double click on the line and go to the document overview.
    In both the above cases, you will know from the accounting entry if any deduction has ben made at the time of F110.
    Please revert for any clarification.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Anit

  • F110 PAYMENT RUN NOT PICKING UP LINE ITEMS

    Hi Everyone,
    We use the APP functionality to pay customers credit memo. so when running F110, we indicate the credit memo document number in the further selection criteria in F110. It has always been working fine, but some customer that we have paid before, we ran F110 and it cleared some documents but did not clear the others. The line item is sitting in the customers account correctly and the payment terms is the one we have always used (2% 15 days net 30days).
    What do you think i can check againg

    hi Adeola,
    See for running the F110 the payment must be overdue then only can able to run the APP run.
    As you have mentioned in ur seetings only that the payment terms is set for 30 days.
    As this payments is not yet overdue.
    If you Run after 30 days then you can run the Payment run.
    Please let me know, is this helpfull to u.....
    Regards
    Ranjit

  • FI  F110 payment run multiple payment documents for same vendor l

    We have an issue where a F110 automatic payment run creates two payment documents for the same vendor multiple open items in the same run. The payment method for all the open items is the same.  I am not able to identify the logic based on which system bifurcates these open items to create two different payment documents. It is standard SAP functionality and we do not have any additional customization.
    I have also checked criteria mentioned in FBZP Payment method in company code Payment per due day but does not seem to be relevant. If you have any pointers in this context request you to share the same at the earliest.

    Hello,
    In FBZP we have below setting for grouping of items in company code payment method.
    1.Single payment for marked line item: Single payment will be created for every line item if this check box is selected.
    2.Payment per due day: One payment document is created for all the invoices which are due on specific due date.
    Please check if any of above option is selected here.
    We have also control at vendor master:
    Vendor master data > Company code > Payment data > Automatic payment transactions > individual payment.
    If check box is selected then every vendor or customer item is paid separately during automatic payment transactions.
    Thanks!
    Raju

  • F110 Payment run authorisation for release of funds

    Hi All,
    we are in the process of streamlining our SAP banking process with Westpac's integrated banking system.
    Specifically the AP and payroll process.  Under the current system we upload the payment file to their online system and we then have two signatories who sign in and authorise the release of funds online.
    Under the new process, we want to remove any manual handling of the payment files.  It is assumed that the authorisation for the release of funds is done in SAP and there is no online signature for the release of the funds. 
    The only way i can think of to do this is by controlling access the payment run process and have our signatories process one element of the payment run each I.e.
    1)    AP clerk creates the payment proposal
    2)    Signatory 1 executes the payment proposal
    3)    Signatory 2 Executes the print of the payment run (this stage produces our output file which is sent directly to the bank)
    However, this seems a little clunky and our signatories are not necessarily SAP users.  does anyone have suggestions for a more elegant solutions to this? 
    many thanks
    Phil.

    Please work with you Security Team. The solution for this is:
    1. Create Three differenet Roles
    For Scenario 1) AP clerk creates the payment proposal
    Solution. Give in Role 1
    Key        Action
    02         Edit parameters
    03         Display parameters
    For Scenario  2) Signatory 1 executes the payment proposal
    Solution. Give in Role 2
    11         Execute proposal
    12         Edit proposal
    13         Display proposal
    14         Delete proposal
    15         Create payment medium proposal
    For Scenario  3) Signatory 2 Executes the print of the payment run (this stage produces our output file which is sent directly to the bank)
    Solution. Give in Role 3
    21         Execute payment run
    23         Display payment run
    24         Delete payment run payment data
    25         Create payment media of payment run
    26         Delete payment orders of payment run
    31         Print payment medium manually
    to See the above option follow the below path:
    T-Code F110>Enviornemnt>Authorization
    Hope this helps.
    Please let me know if you have any questions.
    Regards,
    Vivek Srivastava

Maybe you are looking for

  • Domain Controllers not replicating

    Hi All Domain name: abc.com DC1 - Windows Server 2003 R2 (Physical Server) - 192.168.1.1 DC2 - Windows Server 2012 (Virtual Machine) - 192.168.1.2 Somehow DC1 doesn't replicated to DC2. netdom query fsmo's result: Schema master                DC1.abc

  • Continuous "36888 Schannel Errors" in System Event Log when NOT connected to Internet

    We are hoping someone will be able to assist with us this very strange issue please ? We are using Windows 8.1 x64 Enterprise with Office 2013 and the latest Symantec Endpoint Proctecion v12.1.5 installed. They are managed using SCCM2012 in a large A

  • How to get error message from the BPEL process

    Hi, We have some BPEL processes running in BPEL PM 10g. If any of these BPEL process fails, we would like to get the error message caused this process to fail. Please let me know where does the BPEL proccess holds (table/file) these details. or is it

  • R12 Future Dated Payments

    Hi All, Kindly let me know if there is a solution for the below case. Ex- there is a future dated payment issued in oracle with maturity date as on 01 June 2011, now during the time of issuing the accounting would be Supplier Liability Dr to Future D

  • Issue processing B2B message id from AQ in BPEL 11g

    Hi, IN 10g we used header variable to get the b2b message id for a message from AQ for inbound messages. But when we migrated the BPEL to 11g, we are not able to retrive the B2B mesage id from header as the header variable is coming as null. Let me k