F110 Payment run stopped, status Payment run has been carried out.

Hi experts,
I have searched in this forum but didn't find suitable scenario.
I have run automatic payment after the proposal created.
Somehow the payment run status stopped at "Payment run has been carried out".
Then I check the payment run log:
Job started                                                                     
Step 001 started (program SAPF110S, variant &0000000007737, user name xxxxxx)
Log for payment run for payment on xx.xx.2009, identification XXxxx             
System error occurred during blocking attempt; payment run stopped              
... the execution of the payment program is terminated                          
End of log                                                                      
Job finished                                                                    
I thought no accounting document has been posted.
Is it the right way if I re-run the program SAPF110S with its variant?
What is the possible impact.
Kindly advise.
regards,
rob

Hi,
Yes there might be no accounting document has been posted because even though the payment run has been carried out but parameters you have mentioned might not been selected because of many reasons.
Please go to EDIT - Payment -
Payment list and exception list.......
Please check if any entry is there in payment list if it is than some doc has been posted.
Rest will go to EXCEPTION list.... will show you the exact errors.
Please check the same in the proposal run first... it seems that PROPOSAL run in not only correct.
See the error and correct it.

Similar Messages

  • F110-payment has been carried out

    Hi ,
    After making the payment, status is showing as payment has been carried out........what may be the reasons for this.
    Regards,
    Dharani

    Hello Dharani,
    I have the same case as you.
    In fact i didn't found any explanations for that but i resolved the problem by deleting the proposal and parameters also.
    Then, i created it again, i entered parameters and i save and it works fine.
    Other thing that you have to check: Please check if there is other payment run that still exist in the system and that use all or some parameters as the current one and delete them.
    Be sure that there no other payment ID that still open
    Regards
    T

  • How to find original document for which settlement has been carried out.

    Hello Friends,
    As a process of period end, we have executed the automatic settlement for assets under construction for an internal order through KO8G.
    After completing the run system has posted a document successfully.
    When I want to check the original document for posted document through FB03, through   Environment  Document Environment  Original document. System is showing the same settlement document rather than the original document. 
    Can any one explain me how to check the original document for which settlement has been carried out.
    Regards,
    RS

    "Original document" means from where the document originated. Means for eg MM invoice will be original document for FI invoice. Hoever for settlement document, Settlement process it self is the origin for posting. This way, You cannt trace back the Fi postings which got settled. You need to run line item report for the object and analyse the Fi postings and corresponding Settlement postings

  • Can I restore from an iTunes backup after setting up as a new phone when a full reboot/restore has been carried out?

    Can I restore from an iTunes backup after setting up as a new phone when a full reboot/restore has been carried out?

    As @wjosten says. Note, however, that it is important to NOT sync the phone after resetting it. A Sync will overwrite the backup that you want to restore.

  • How to remove payment block for AP invoices which has been cleared

    How to remove payment block for AP invoices which has been cleared
    Thanks
    Chiru

    Hi,
    Thanks for immediate response in fb02 is in deable mode
    mrbr unable to change
    please provide to to remove blocking code i will assign points
    Thnaks
    Chiru

  • [SOLVED] Xfce 4.8, "no running instance of xfce4-panel has been found"

    Hello fellow Archers!
    I just upgraded my Xfce installation to version 4.8, but I have a weird problem with xfce4-panel. After upgrading the system via pacman I've rebooted, and after logging in I couldn't see the Xfce's panel anymore! Moreover, a dialog box pops up saying that "no running instance of xfce4-panel has been found". I've tried to fix this issue by launching xfce4-panel through a terminal, and then saving the session before logging out. Now when I log in, I can finally see the panel, but the pop up window keeps coming out every single time. Do you have any suggestions on what could be the issue?
    Thanks in advance!
    Last edited by Tudhalyas (2011-01-18 12:15:03)

    Behemot you'd better start a different thread. May be a different issue as this one is solved.
    isn't it supposed to start from /etc/xdg/xfce4/xfconf/xfce-perchannel-xml/xfce4-session.xml ? Here's what's in mine:
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <channel name="xfce4-session" version="1.0">
    <property name="general" type="empty">
    <property name="FailsafeSessionName" type="string" value="Failsafe"/>
    </property>
    <property name="sessions" type="empty">
    <property name="Failsafe" type="empty">
    <property name="IsFailsafe" type="bool" value="true"/>
    <property name="Count" type="int" value="5"/>
    <property name="Client0_Command" type="array">
    <value type="string" value="xfwm4"/>
    </property>
    <property name="Client0_PerScreen" type="bool" value="false"/>
    <property name="Client1_Command" type="array">
    <value type="string" value="xfce4-panel"/>
    </property>
    <property name="Client1_PerScreen" type="bool" value="false"/>
    <property name="Client2_Command" type="array">
    <value type="string" value="Thunar"/>
    <value type="string" value="--daemon"/>
    </property>
    <property name="Client2_PerScreen" type="bool" value="false"/>
    <property name="Client3_Command" type="array">
    <value type="string" value="xfdesktop"/>
    </property>
    <property name="Client3_PerScreen" type="bool" value="false"/>
    <property name="Client4_Command" type="array">
    <value type="string" value="xfce4-settings-helper"/>
    </property>
    <property name="Client4_PerScreen" type="bool" value="false"/>
    </property>
    </property>
    <property name="splash" type="empty">
    <property name="Engine" type="string" value=""/>
    </property>
    </channel>
    Last edited by rwd (2011-04-23 07:32:04)

  • Smartform run-time error 5825: object has been deleted

    While modifying a smartform, I keep on getting run-time error 5825 object has been deleted.
    (microsoft visual basic)
    I have already restarted sap gui, even deleted my smartform and started another.. it keeps on haunting me.
    Anybody an idea how to get rid of this error???

    Hi,
    Do you use MS Word 2007 as the ediitor for sapscript and smartforms? In this case you need the support packs specified in SAP note #1115157.  Make sure you have the satest SAPGUI patch also.
    You can switch to the old graphical editor via transaction I18N -> I18N Customizing -> MS Word as Editor.
    regards,
    Aidan

  • Bought my iPhone in march with working sim just stopped working yesterday. Has been saying searching since yesterday what do I do?!!

    Bought my iPhone in march with working sim just stopped working yesterday. Has been saying searching since yesterday what do I do?!!

    is restart dont help
    http://www.apple.com/support/iphone/assistant/phone/#section_1
    then I would return it under warrenty

  • Not able to create Follow up transaction since it has been grayed out

    Hi Experts,
    We have a scenario where in we will create the Sales Transactions (OR) in ECC and then it will replicates to CRM.
    In CRM we wants to create Returns Order (RE) as a follow up Transaction to OR (which is replicated from ECC to CRM) .
    When I tried to create Returns Order (RE) in CRM as a follow up document to Sales Transaction (OR), the follow up Transaction CRM Returns (RE) has been grayed out. I mean it is in display mode only.
    And then I created Sales Transaction (OR) in CRM itself and then I tried to create follow up Returns Transaction (RE) I was able to create.
    But I am not able to Create Returns Order (RE) for the Sales Transactions (OR) that have been replicated from ECC to CRM.
    Can anybody help me in resolving this issue. Any help ful answer will be rewarded with points.
    Thanks in advance,
    -Frederick Johnson.

    Hi Fredrick,
    Please check, whether you have completed all the steps for Copying Control for Business Transactions in the following path in IMG:
    SPRO->Customer Relationship Management->Transactions->Basic Settings->Copying Control for Business Transactions:
    - Define Copying Control for Transaction Types
       In this step, you define the control for copying business transaction types.
       To do this, you enter a source tranaction type and a target transaction type, and define the corresponding conditions for this combination.
    - Define Copying Control for Item Categories
    In this step, you define the control for copying item categories.
    To do so, you enter a source item category and a target item category, and define the corresponding conditions.
    - Define Item Category Determination when Copying
    In this step, you define a specific item category determination which should be run during copying. The item category is used to find the target item category in the source transaction for the transaction type in the target transaction. This means that the transaction type for the source transaction is not relevant for the item category determination.
    If the system cannot find an entry for the copying transaction in this table, the item category is found in the target transaction using the normal item category determination.
    This might help you
    regards
    Srikantan

  • ESE - Event Log Warning: 906 - A significant portion of the database buffer cache has been written out to the system paging file...

    Hello -
    We have 3 x EX2010 SP3 RU5 nodes in a cross-site DAG.
    Multi-role servers with 18 GB RAM [increased from 16 GB in an attempt to clear this warning without success].
    We run nightly backups on both nodes at the Primary Site.
    Node 1 backup covers all mailbox databases [active & passive].
    Node 2 backup covers the Public Folders database.
    The backups for each database are timed so they do not overlap.
    During each backup we get several of these event log warnings:
     Log Name:      Application
     Source:        ESE
     Date:          23/04/2014 00:47:22
     Event ID:      906
     Task Category: Performance
     Level:         Warning
     Keywords:      Classic
     User:          N/A
     Computer:      EX1.xxx.com
     Description:
     Information Store (5012) A significant portion of the database buffer cache has been written out to the system paging file.  This may result  in severe performance degradation.
     See help link for complete details of possible causes.
     Resident cache has fallen by 42523 buffers (or 27%) in the last 903 seconds.
     Current Total Percent Resident: 26% (110122 of 421303 buffers)
    We've rescheduled the backups and the warning message occurences just move with the backup schedules.
    We're not aware of perceived end-user performance degradation, overnight backups in this time zone coincide with the business day for mailbox users in SEA.
    I raised a call with the Microsoft Enterprise Support folks, they had a look at BPA output and from their diagnostics tool. We have enough RAM and no major issues detected.
    They suggested McAfee AV could be the root of our problems, but we have v8.8 with EX2010 exceptions configured.
    Backup software is Asigra V12.2 with latest hotfixes.
    We're trying to clear up these warnings as they're throwing SCOM alerts and making a mess of availability reporting.
    Any suggestions please?
    Thanks in advance

    Having said all that, a colleague has suggested we just limit the amount of RAM available for the EX2010 DB cache
    Then it won't have to start releasing RAM when the backup runs, and won't throw SCOM alerts
    This attribute should do it...
    msExchESEParamCacheSizeMax
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee832793.aspx
    Give me a shout if this is a bad idea
    Thanks

  • A significant portion of the database buffer cache has been written out to the system paging file.

    Hi,
    We seem to get this error through SCOM every couple of weeks.  It doesn't correlate with the AV updates, so I'm not sure what's eating up the memory.  The server has been patched to the latest roll up and service pack.  The mailbox servers
    have been provisioned sufficiently with more than enough memory.  Currently they just slow down until the databases activate on another mailbox server.
    A significant portion of the database buffer cache has been written out to the system paging file.
    Any ideas?

    I've seen this with properly sized servers with very little Exchange load running. It could be a  number of different things.  Here are some items to check:
    Confirm that the server hardware has the latest BIOS, drivers, firmware, etc
    Confirm that the Windows OS is running the recommended hotfixes.  Here is an older post that might still apply to you
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/dblanch/archive/2012/02/27/a-few-hotfixes-to-consider.aspx
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2699780/en-us
    Setup a perfmon to capture data from the server. Look for disk performance, excessive paging, CPU/Processor spikes, and more.  Use the PAL tool to collect and analyze the perf data -
    http://pal.codeplex.com/
    Include looking for other applications or processes that might be consuming system resources (AV, Backup, security, etc)
    Be sure that the disk are properly aligned -
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/mikelag/archive/2011/02/09/how-fragmentation-on-incorrectly-formatted-ntfs-volumes-affects-exchange.aspx
    Check that the network is properly configured for Exchange server.  You might be surprise how the network config can cause perf & scom alerts.
    Make sure that you did not (improperly) statically set msExchESEParamCacheSizeMax and msExchESEParamCacheSizeMin attributes in Active Directory -
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee832793(v=exchg.141).aspx
    Be sure that hyperthreading is NOT enabled -
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd346699(v=exchg.141).aspx#Hyper
    Check that there are no hardware issues on the server (RAM, CPU, etc).  You might need to run some vendor specific utilities/tools to validate.
    Proper paging file configuration should be considered for Exchange servers.  You can use the perfmon to see just how much paging is occurring.
    These will usually lead you in the right direction. Good Luck!

  • SCOM reports "A significant portion of the database buffer cache has been written out to the system paging file. This may result in severe performance degradation"

    This was discussed here, with no resolution
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/exchange2010/thread/bb073c59-b88f-471b-a209-d7b5d9e5aa28?prof=required
    I have the same issue.  This is a single-purpose physical mailbox server with 320 users and 72GB of RAM.  That should be plenty.  I've checked and there are no manual settings for the database cache.  There are no other problems with
    the server, nothing reported in the logs, except for the aforementioned error (see below).
    The server is sluggish.  A reboot will clear up the problem temporarily.  The only processes using any significant amount of memory are store.exe (using 53GB), regsvc (using 5) and W3 and Monitoringhost.exe using 1 GB each.  Does anyone have
    any ideas on this?
    Warning ESE Event ID 906. 
    Information Store (1497076) A significant portion of the database buffer cache has been written out to the system paging file.  This may result in severe performance degradation. See help link for complete details of possible causes. Resident cache
    has fallen by 213107 buffers (or 11%) in the last 207168 seconds. Current Total Percent Resident: 79% (1574197 of 1969409 buffers)

    Brian,
    We had this event log entry as well which SCOM picked up on, and 10 seconds before it the Forefront Protection 2010 for Exchange updated all of its engines.
    We are running Exchange 2010 SP2 RU3 with no file system antivirus (the boxes are restricted and have UAC turned on as mitigations). We are running the servers primarily as Hub Transport servers with 16GB of RAM, but they do have the mailbox role installed
    for the sole purpose of serving as our public folder servers.
    So we theroized the STORE process was just grabbing a ton of RAM, and occasionally it was told to dump the memory so the other processes could grab some - thus generating the alert. Up until last night we thought nothing of it, but ~25 seconds after the
    cache flush to paging file, we got the following alert:
    Log Name:      Application
    Source:        MSExchangeTransport
    Date:          8/2/2012 2:08:14 AM
    Event ID:      17012
    Task Category: Storage
    Level:         Error
    Keywords:      Classic
    User:          N/A
    Computer:      HTS1.company.com
    Description:
    Transport Mail Database: The database could not allocate memory. Please close some applications to make sure you have enough memory for Exchange Server. The exception is Microsoft.Exchange.Isam.IsamOutOfMemoryException: Out of Memory (-1011)
       at Microsoft.Exchange.Isam.JetInterop.CallW(Int32 errFn)
       at Microsoft.Exchange.Isam.JetInterop.MJetOpenDatabase(MJET_SESID sesid, String file, String connect, MJET_GRBIT grbit, MJET_WRN& wrn)
       at Microsoft.Exchange.Isam.JetInterop.MJetOpenDatabase(MJET_SESID sesid, String file, MJET_GRBIT grbit)
       at Microsoft.Exchange.Isam.JetInterop.MJetOpenDatabase(MJET_SESID sesid, String file)
       at Microsoft.Exchange.Isam.Interop.MJetOpenDatabase(MJET_SESID sesid, String file)
       at Microsoft.Exchange.Transport.Storage.DataConnection..ctor(MJET_INSTANCE instance, DataSource source).
    Followed by:
    Log Name:      Application
    Source:        MSExchangeTransport
    Date:          8/2/2012 2:08:15 AM
    Event ID:      17106
    Task Category: Storage
    Level:         Information
    Keywords:      Classic
    User:          N/A
    Computer:      HTS1.company.com
    Description:
    Transport Mail Database: MSExchangeTransport has detected a critical storage error, updated the registry key (SOFTWARE\Microsoft\ExchangeServer\v14\Transport\QueueDatabase) and as a result, will attempt self-healing after process restart.
    Log Name:      Application
    Source:        MSExchangeTransport
    Date:          8/2/2012 2:13:50 AM
    Event ID:      17102
    Task Category: Storage
    Level:         Warning
    Keywords:      Classic
    User:          N/A
    Computer:      HTS1.company.com
    Description:
    Transport Mail Database: MSExchangeTransport has detected a critical storage error and has taken an automated recovery action.  This recovery action will not be repeated until the target folders are renamed or deleted. Directory path:E:\EXCHSRVR\TransportRoles\Data\Queue
    is moved to directory path:E:\EXCHSRVR\TransportRoles\Data\Queue\Queue.old.
    So it seems as if the Forefront Protection 2010 for Exchange inadvertently trigger the cache flush which didn't appear to happen quick or thuroughly enough for the transport service to do what it needed to do, so it freaked out and performed the subsequent
    actions.
    Do you have any ideas on how to prevent this 906 warning, which cascaded into a transport service outage?
    Thanks!

  • Modifications to a jsp file not getting loaded after it has been served out once

    Hi,
    I am using Weblogic 6.1 on solaris platform.
    I have created a new managed server under the default domain. A new
    default web application was created with a DefaultWebApp directory which
    acts as the default directory for JSP files for this server.
    problem 1:
    In this new server if i make changes to a jsp file which has been served out
    once, the modifications are not reflected until and unless i restart the
    server.
    problem 2:
    If I start the server and after that I add a JSP file to the DefaultWebApp
    directory, if I try to access it it gives a 404 error which is file not
    found.
    These problems do not occur in the original server which got created when i
    did the installation.
    Can someone help me out please.
    Pankaj

    Hi.
    On reflection I believe this is normal behavior for WLS 6.x. In order to see
    changes to jsps (or other elements in the webapp) you need to either
    undeploy/redeploy the webapp via the console or the command line utility, or you
    can use the refresh utility if your webapp is deployed in the exploded directory
    format (ie not a war file).
    For docs on redeploying and refreshing from the command line see:
    http://e-docs.bea.com/wls/docs61/webapp/deployment.html
    Regards,
    Michael
    Pankaj Bansal wrote:
    yes we installed SP2 for weblogic 6.1....
    the OS is Solaris ver 2.8
    any suggestions on what can i do apart from opening a case with support?
    Pankaj
    "Michael Young" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]..
    Hi.
    Are you running with service pack 2? If not please try this. If youstill see
    this with sp2 then please open a case with support.
    Thanks,
    Michael
    Pankaj Bansal wrote:
    Hi,
    I am using Weblogic 6.1 on solaris platform.
    I have created a new managed server under the default domain. A new
    default web application was created with a DefaultWebApp directory which
    acts as the default directory for JSP files for this server.
    problem 1:
    In this new server if i make changes to a jsp file which has been served
    out
    once, the modifications are not reflected until and unless i restart the
    server.
    problem 2:
    If I start the server and after that I add a JSP file to theDefaultWebApp
    directory, if I try to access it it gives a 404 error which is file not
    found.
    These problems do not occur in the original server which got createdwhen i
    did the installation.
    Can someone help me out please.
    Pankaj--
    Michael Young
    Developer Relations Engineer
    BEA Support
    Michael Young
    Developer Relations Engineer
    BEA Support

  • Query machine 'server' has been taken out of rotation due to this error: The object is not initialzed?

    Hi, in my MOSS 2007 farm getting below Search errors frequently:
    1.“EventID: 0x00002736 (10038) - Query machine 'server xyz' has been taken out of rotation due to this error: The object is not initialized. 0x8004180b. It will be retried in 15 seconds”
    2. Retry of query machine 'server abc' has failed with error: The content index is corrupt.  
    In this Farm, one Application server works as an index server and two WFE servers work as Query servers.
    So currently resolving the issue resetting the crawl content and running full crawl. I also changed the Index file location frequently on both the WFE servers but frequently error is coming.
    Please tell me what to do.

    Hi Prakash,
    It seems like your existing index partition is corrupted, please remove initial index partition and create new.
    Please refer below article, this will give you some idea to troubleshot this issue further:
    http://daxdilip.blogspot.in/2012/06/troubleshooting-sharepoint-search.html
    If my contribution helps you, please click Mark As Answer on that post and
    Vote as Helpful
    Thanks, ShankarSingh(MCP)

  • The account "sadmin" has been deleted out from under us!

    We have a new Intel Xserve we recently set up with 10.6 Server. Initially we ran OD, DNS, and DHCP only on the machine while our file shares continued to run on our older 10.4 Servers. When I moved our Xserve RAID (Formatted off of the old server and onto the Xserve we started experiencing issues where after approximately 24 hours we would have authentication issues connecting via SMB or AFP. Also, when I tried to connect via ARD or SSH I was unable to authenticate. Sometimes I could SSH in as root but others I would have to go to the console directly. A reboot clears the issue but about 24 hours later it comes back.
    Looking at the console I see:
    3/5/10 8:08:58 AM com.apple.launchd.peruser.501[187] (com.apple.PreferenceSyncAgent[58171]) The account "sadmin" has been deleted out from under us!
    3/5/10 8:08:58 AM com.apple.launchd.peruser.501[187] (com.apple.PreferenceSyncAgent[58171]) In a future build of the OS, this error will be fatal.
    3/5/10 8:09:23 AM com.apple.launchd.peruser.501[187] (com.apple.SubmitDiagInfo[58190]) The account "sadmin" has been deleted out from under us!
    3/5/10 8:09:23 AM com.apple.launchd.peruser.501[187] (com.apple.SubmitDiagInfo[58190]) In a future build of the OS, this error will be fatal.
    3/5/10 8:09:29 AM com.apple.launchd.peruser.501[187] ([0x0-0x61061].com.apple.iCal.helper[58201]) The account "sadmin" has been deleted out from under us!
    3/5/10 8:09:29 AM com.apple.launchd.peruser.501[187] ([0x0-0x61061].com.apple.iCal.helper[58201]) In a future build of the OS, this error will be fatal.
    (note: iCal service is not running)
    Any ideas on this? Daily reboots are annoying.

    I have the same problem (deleted email account). I think I mistakenly set up an account when I was buying an Apple product online, not realizing that it would be the same ID as my iTunes.
    What is the way to actually contact Apple?
    I have been clicking around in circles for hours! Will I have to pay them to resolve this? I don't have any products still have applecare . . .

Maybe you are looking for