F110 wtih vendors locked

Hio everybody.
Can someone help-me with this case:
My administrative user need to create more than one automatic payment
for the same vendor but for different invoices/payment method.
But when a vendor is contained in another proposal you cannot select
it in a new proposal even if the invoices you want select are different because
they have different payment methods selected in the parameters.
Some idea ro solve the problem?
Thanks in advance

Not too sure what version of ERP you are using by in ERP 6.0, there is F110S, where you can schedule your payment runs.
All you do here is you add constant parameters.
In terms of the timing, why dont you run say a manual check run on a Monday and then the next day do one for Wire transfer for example.
Saving the paramters does not lock the data, running the propsal does.
Please award points if useful.

Similar Messages

XMLBeans an satndard or a potential "Vendor Lock-in" source?????

Hi...
I'm developing a J2EE App that needs to persist its configuration data in a non Database storage mainly because one of the config data is the database connection string, driver name, etc.
Taking a look at some App servers instalations directories (SJSAS an JBOSS) i fpund that both servers persist this type of info using XML files so i think that my app may take advantage of using xml instead Java Properties files...
Well, the problem is that after searching info about some JAXP and JAXB APIS i found a third party API Called XMLBeans from Apache Foundation... As JAXB, XMLBeans bind java objects to XML file but it also support XMLSchema files.
My app real requirement is to persist its configuration data to server file system and validate the data at runtime in order to pevent data corruption. XMLBeans appears to be what i need to use but using a third party API would no bring me app to a "VENDOR LOCK-IN"???
I know that some of this third party libraries becomes parts of J2SE or J2EE Standard after some time but i want to be sure of what i'm doing in order to make my app as portable as possible.
Regards...

thanks for the anwser... well my goal is to develop an application capable of read and write xml files according to a schema...
i want to avoid vendor specific features in order to be able to deploy my app to any J2EE Server that implement the standard (SJSAS, JBoss, Etc).
it's seen that i do not make myself clear, my goal is to be able to deploy my app without having to create system variables, adding extra libraries to J2EE server, etc.... i guess XMLBeans is the right way, but if you know a way to write xml files and validate it against schemas using native Java API (StrAX, JAXB, JAXP) please let me know....
I wil try to put XMLBeans libraries inside lib folder of my ear just to see what happend !!!!!!!!!!
Anyway thanks for the help and any advice you could give me....
Regards

Payment Proposal F110 for vendors

Dear experts,
Here is my requirement. A batch job should be scheduled to create a payment proposal. As soon as a proposal created, it should be routed to an approver via workflow to view the proposal and proceed further to run the payments.
We have about 20 company codes and only one company will be making a payment from only one bank account. We have about 4 different payment methods and few invoice document types. My questions are
is it best practice to schedule a payment proposal via a batch job?? i have seen people running the proposal manually..
1) Are there any standard workflows or user exits available to trigger when a proposal is created
2) What will be the best practice to give a logic to trigger a workflow? When we create a proposal, table REGUH will be updated for each payment document. So, if I ask workflow to look in reguh table for all payment runs on today's date and create a work item for all of the line item?
3) The reviewer will have only display access to the proposal once they click on work item in the workflow. So they would hit the display proposal icon to view the details.
3) I have only worked with four company codes based off four different countries. but, in this scenario we have sereral company codes for one country. what is the best practice to schedule a proposal for all company codes and payment methods at the same time? if i do this, i will have multiple payment programs and a variant for each payment program. I'm concerned about producing DME and postive pay file at single shot.. or by company code and payment method, if I do this the reviewer have to look at the proposal by payment method
4)I'm unable to run proposal without entering vendor numbers parameters screen AND additional log screen. How can I bypass this and jsut run for all vendor in those comopany codes? I have documen type in free selection. If I don't give vendor number in either of these two places, I will get a message that no accounts have been selected yet.
Please help

Hi,
Please check transaction : F110S
Here you have various options to schedule the proposal and payment with different comapny codes and payment methods.
Please read the program documentation for further processing.
Rgds
Murali. N

UserExit or Customer Exit for F110 - '*' on Vendor Line Item Payment Run

Dear all,
Background
Currently in F110, when processing for vendor payments, the item text ( or segment text) is only printed out when item text begins with an asterik ' * '. The asterik is meant to indicate that this document/item is posted from external system. You may do a F1 on the text field for detail explanation.
In the event, asterik is not present on the item text even if the text is not blank, it will not be printed at all.
Here are two OSS notes on the asteriks: 312623 and 1292333.
Include: F110SFS0_SATZ_KOMPLETTIEREN
*------- Segementtext
IF REGUP-SGTXT(1) NE '*'.
    REGUP-SGTXT = SPACE.
ENDIF.
Requirement
User is requesting for item text to be printed at all time, when the text exist, regardless of ' * '.
Question
Does anyone know of a user exit / customer exit that i could use to do modification for SGTXT ?
Would appreciate it, if you could share your suggestions / experiences - on this matter, even if it doesn't need to be resolved through user exits. Thanks in advance

BTW..you have fot following exits for F110;
Transaction Code - F110                     Parameters for Automatic Payment
Enhancement/ Business Add-in            Description
Enhancement
RFFOX074                                Frame for user exit RFFOX074 (in program RFFOCH_U)
RFFOX075                                Frame for user exit RFFOX075 (in program RFFOCH_U)
RFFOX081                                Frame for user exit RFFOX081 (in program RFFOF__T)
RFFOX082                                Frame for user exit RFFOX082 (in program RFFOF__T)
RFFOX100                                Frame for user exit RFFOX100 (in program RFFOUS_T)
RFFOX101                                Frame for user exit RFFOX101 (in program RFFOUS_T)
RFFOX102                                Frame for user exit RFFOX102 (in program RFFOUS_T)
RFFOX103                                Frame for user exit RFFOX103 (in program RFFOUS_T)
RFFOX104                                user exit
RFFOX105                                Frame for user exit RFFOX105 (in program RFFOUS_T)
RFFOX200                                Frame for user exit RFFOX200 (in program RFFONZ_T)
RFFOX210                                Frame for user exit RFFOX210 (in program RFFOAU_T)
RFFOX211                                Frame for user exit RFFOX211 (in program RFFONZ_T)
RFFOX230                                General program for user exit RFFOX230 (in program RFFOJP_L)
RFFOX240                                Enhancement for User Exit 240 (RFFOAT_P)
RFFOX250                                Enhancement for User Exit 250 (RFFODK_E)
RFFOX901                                Framework for user exit RFFOX901 (in program RFFOM100)
RFFOX902                                Framework for user exit RFFOX902 (in program RFFOM100)
FDTAX001                                Enhancement to Transaction FDTA (event after the download)
FEDI0002                                Function exits for EDI DOCS in FI - Incoming pyt adv.notes
FEDI0003                                Function exits for EDI docs in FI - Save PEXR segments
FEDI0004                                Function exits for EDI docs in FI - particular events
FEDI0006                                Function Exits for EDI-docs in FI: Save IDCR Segments
RFFOX003                                Frame for user exit RFFOX003 (in program RFFOM100)
RFFOX041                                Framework for user exit RFFOX041 (in program RFFOBE_I)
RFFOX042                                Framework for user exit RFFOX042 (in program RFFOBE_E)
RFFOX043                                Framework for user exit RFFOX043 (in program RFFOBE_D)
RFFOX061                                Frame for user exit RFFOX061 (in program RFFOCH_P)
RFFOX062                                Frame for user exit RFFOX062 (in program RFFOCH_P)
RFFOX063                                Frame for user exit RFFOX063 (in program RFFOCH_P)
RFFOX064                                Frame for user exit RFFOX064 (in program RFFOCH_P)
RFFOX065                                Frame for user exit RFFOX065 (in program RFFOCH_P)
RFFOX066                                Frame for user exit RFFOX066 (in program RFFOCH_P)
RFFOX071                                Frame for user exit RFFOX071 (in program RFFOCH_U)
RFFOX072                                Frame for user exit RFFOX072 (in program RFFOCH_U)
RFFOX073                                Frame for user exit RFFOX073 (in program RFFOCH_U)
Business Add-in
FI_BSTM_MC_EXIT                         FI Account Statement: Exit from MultiCash Conversion
FI_F110_SCHEDULE_JOB                    F110: Check before scheduling a proposal/update run

F110 for vendor invoices which are debits and for credits BVTYP are used

Dear all,
I have the following situation:
- 1 vendor with many documents to pay
- some documents have 1 line item that is a debit (positive value in FBL1N)
- this vendor has 2 bank accounts in master data and I would like to pay the second one, so the Partner Bank Type (BVTYP) field is filled with number 1 and 2
- before payment at FBL1N, I execute the mass modification of all documents putting the number 2 at the BVTYP field
- but when I execute the proposal at F110, only the documents with debit have error: No pymt possible because items with a debit bal, but the total is credit for vendor
I have seen that when I do not fill the BVTYP field in the documents, the F110 is executed normally, I mean, it considers debits and credits (we have previously created a new payment form for this kind of vendors, one that could consider debits and credits).
PS: at FBL1N, when I open the document with the debit item, it doesn't show the field BVTYP.
Is there any kind of configuration that I have to make to F110 start considering the filled BVTYP field?
Thanks in advance.
Kathia Tsuboi

Hi Abhi,
I have created some queries for the same. COuld you help me if I am going in the rite direction.
I have created a query to find the suppliers which are not being used in the POs for the past one year by using the below query: But for invoices and payments to be included, I am finding it a bit difficult....need help..............
--FINAL QUERY
SELECT vendor_id, vendor_name, creation_date, last_update_date
FROM po_vendors v
WHERE v.end_date_active IS NULL
AND v.enabled_flag = 'Y'
AND NOT EXISTS (
SELECT 1
FROM po_headers_all h
WHERE h.vendor_id = v.vendor_id
AND h.creation_date(+) BETWEEN (SYSDATE - 365) AND (SYSDATE))
ORDER BY vendor_id DESC
Is it possible to send me the program so that it would be helpful for me to use it.
email: [email protected]
Help Greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Aman

Issue during F110 for Vendor

Dear SAP Experts,
There is Vendor which is for WTH Tax. There is vendor posting of 1000 Cr and Dr XYX Account of 900 and Dr 100 of WTH Tax. Now when i go to FBL1N i see 900 as outstanding for Vendor but when i do F110 for the vendor i the proposal i see 1000 amount and when i double click it, the amount is 900.
Kindly advice.

Hi,
As per your entry if you see in FBL1N it will display vendor line items only so it is showing as 900.
While in F110 the system will take the invoice amount for display, but it pay only line item amount 900 thats why it is showing as 1000 but if you double click on it will show the actual vendor line item amount only.
BR,
Satya

F110 Email Vendor payment advices.

Hi SAP Gurus,
Today we are printing email advices to our vendors, we would like to change this so that we can email payment advices to our vendors.
I have looked at different messages here at SDN, but I cannot get it to work.
I have in FIBF - settings, process modules and customer - created Z_SAMPLE_Process_00002040.
We are using form F110_IN_AVIS.
We are using payment medium program RFFOEDI1.
I have defined a email adress on the vendor and set the standard communication mth. to INT E.Mail.
But it is not working, what am I missing ?.
Thanks and best regards
Pernille

Dear Pernille,
please kindly check the following hints to help you:
1) Please check whether you selected the check box in the variant
configuration "print payment advice". The variant is of the variant
that you maintain in the printout/data medium tab of transaction F110.
2) Unfortunately it's technically not possible to send remittance
advices per e-mail and to spool at the same time. You can only either
send advices per e-mail or send them to spool. This is the standard
system design.
3) Please check FBZP to the desired company code and payment method to
see if the customer has selected the flag "NoPaymentAdv.". It must be
set as "Always payment Advice" and afterwards the advices via e-mail is
executed.
4) Please refer the documentation on the sample function module:
'SAMPLE_PROCESS_00002040' in FIBF by following the Menu Path:
FIBF > Environment > Infosystem (Processes) > Click 'Execute' >
Select: 00002040 Autom. pmnt transactns: Output of pmnt advice note
5) To send a business partner a payment advice note by fax or email,You
must use the process interface 00002040 (Business Transaction Events)
define the selection of the message type (printout, fax or email).
Before you can do this, however, you must have carried out the
necessary technical (Basis) settings for faxing or sending emails.
6) Also consider the SAP note 836169.
Thanks.
Mauri

F110-Pay vendor item with special G/L indicador type "Others"

Hi,
Is it posible to pay a vendor ítem by F110 with special G/L indicator type "Others"?
I am trying to pay it by F110 and the system does not find the item.
If I use the same vendor w/o any special G/L indicator or with special G/L indicator type "A" the F110 pay the item.
Thanks,
Cecilia

Dear Cecilia,
Please check your settings in FBZP -> All company codes -> for Vendors/Customers ->
'Sp. G/L transactions to be paid' / 'Sp. G/L trans. for exception list'.
Do you get any error message in the proposal run regarding the special G/L indicator type "Others"?
To get a detailed log, please activate the Additional Log 1,2,4 and enter the affected vendor/customer number used.
See also note http://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1741973
Regards,
Emöke

F110 Only Vendor's position takes the exchange rate from bill

Good Morning, I have a problem, when I create a pay with F110, in the payment document only Vendor's position takes the exchange rate from bill, others positions take the exchange rate from de payment doc. I want all positions take the same exchange rate (Payment Doc). I don't know how fix this.
Example:
Payment Doc.
                                              Amount      /   Exc. Rate /       Amount LC
Vendor's Position            /       293.97     /     2.812       /      826.64
Withholding                    /      -17.64     /     2.768       /              -48.83
Payment                           /       -276.33     /     2.768           /        -764.88
Exchange rate difference /           0     /                     /              -12.94
I hope someone can help me. Thanks.
Regards
Fernando

Hi,
it is the sap std behaviour while creating the PO, picking of the exchange rate from the specified tables and from specified type.Seems you can not change.
Regards,

F110 -Selected Vendor got an error

Hi Guru's,
I'm running the transaction code F110, as a result, some vendors are successfully run, however, some also got an error " No valid Payment Method Found with error number 006.
My parameters are:
Company Code
Payment Method
Next/P/Date
Vendor example range from 100000 to 199999
Hope you can share an answer to this.
Thanks,
Mila

Hi Mila,
Once again mentioning all the check points here:-
1. Check vendor Master, whether Payment method is maintained or not.. If not enter payment method in the Vendor Master FK03.
2. In FBZP Configuration of Payment Methods in Country, check whether Vendor address and bank Details are marked as mandatory, if yes, check whether it is maintained in Vendor master. " The section is "Required Master Record Specification"
3. Check parameters in F110, whether the Payment method that you are mentioning is the same as maintained in Vendor Master/Line item of the Document.
4. The Variant that you are maintaining in F110, should also have the same Payment method.
5. If still you have error, go to additional log and tick Payment method Selection if not successful, and execute payment run, then go to the proposal log and find out the exact reason from the log.
Hope this helps..
Regards,
SAPFICO

Payment program F110 for Vendor Open Item in Foreign currency

Dear sap Guru
Is it possible to Ensures that no exchange rate differences are posted by the payment
Program? I mean: The amount in the bank posting in local currency does not result from translating the foreign currency amount at the current rate but from the total of the local currency amounts from the settled items.
Best regards
marco

Dear PAtel,
I checked and the ther eis the check box 'No exchange rate differences' anyway during the payment program execution the system is making some recalculation for open item in fc.
Someone knows what is the coloumn "Valuation Difference" in the Dysplay Payment Proposal Open Item list?
regards
marco

Sorting F110 Printout by Vendor Line Items

Folks,
How can I sort the Payment prinouts from t-code F110 by Vendor and Line items.
I tried looking at RFFORI01 but there is no place where I can sort and rearrange the
items so that one page prinout will be printed first and multi page printouts later.
I know I can copy RFFOUS_C to Z program and do changes but where to do
the sorting logic.
I tried looking at FBZP Transaction but in vain.
Your help is appreciated

Do not look at FBZP Transaction ,it is for configure print program and layout.
GOTO SE38 ,copy print program to zprogram and do the modification.
This program use Logical database - PYF
sort REGUP by lifnr belnr buzei
write the sort code after get regup in RFFOUS_C which is below of perform extract_vorbereitung.
Once you done changes then configure the print program and layout in FBZP Transaction ( This will done by Functional guy ), now test it in F110 Transaction.
Thanks
Seshu

Payment proposal are not captured some vendor - TCODE F110

Hi All experts,
I'm add new Special GL ind. in F-43 to reclass PPI to PPO.
I'm successfully add it and also successfully reclass the acc and Post it.
The problem come when we try to run payment proposal (TCODE F110),
the vendor that we reclass are not appear on the list.
What acctuall happened?
Is there anything i'm missing on config?
Regards,
Shah

Hi Murukan,
Thanks for you reply.
I'm doing config for Special GL in FBKP.
I'm put Reccon. acc and Special G/L Acc in.
After that, directly do transaction in F-43 using this new Special GL ind.
I'm not doing any config in FBZP.
What should I do actually in FBKP?
I'm really no idea. this is my first time face it.
Regards,
Shah

Priority or payment method and Vendor in F110

Hi All,
During APP (F110) which takes the priority. Payment Method or Vendor.
For Example we have given Payment Methos as A & F in payment Run and Vendor as 30000. This vendor has payment method H on its master.
Now when we are running payment run it is picking this vendor in exception list;
Error#016 Pmnt methods for this run are not specified in master record or in item
Is it because we specified this vendor in Payment run and the payment method used is different.
Please correct me if my understanding is wrong.
Thanks!
Regards,
Vivek

Hi Vivek,
Your Question as to which one takes priority in F110, the vendor or the Payment Method.. so please understand, that System will have vendors mentioned as the base for checking.. the question of priority does not come here..it will check for all documents posted for this vendor with payment method A & F and propose for Payment, and if it does not find anything, it will show this vendor in the exception list.
I guess you are asking, whether system would propose, all vendors line items with Payment method A & F as per your question of priority, then the answer is "No'. System does not behave like that.
For all vendors that you have specified in the list of vendors in the parameters, it will check whether the Payment method mentioned in parameters exists or not, if yes, it will propose all line items with that payment method and if none found, it will show that vendor in exception list.
Hope it clarifies..
Regards,
SAPFICO

F110 - Automatic Payment Program (APP) - Profit Center wise

Has anyone worked on plant wise/profit center wise payments before? We have done necessary enhancement to populate profit center in vendor line item at the time of posting invoice. We are doing profit center wise proposal run in F110 by using additional selection criteria in F110.
However, the problem arises when different profit centers want to make payment to same vendor. In such cases when one profit center has created the proposal for the vendor, F110 locks the vendor for any other payment proposal by making an entry in REGUS table. Hence, when the other profit center creates proposal in F110, the vendor is shown as locked. The lock is released only after the payment run.
All the profit center will run proposal at the same time and after that payment run will be carried out by central treasury. Hence, I cannot schdule the payment run of different profit center at different time.
Is there any work around? Is it possible that same vendor can be contained in different proposals of different profit centers?
We were thinking of doing an enhancement to delete the entries from REGUS table after proposal run. Would it be right way?

It is standard behaviour in F110 for locking vendor.
Try luck to use same paying company code for all your profit center company codes. Keep update

F110 wtih vendors locked

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for