FA approver changes should not lead the cart to buyer

Hi all,
FA(Financial approver) changes the Product category, cart should not go back to buyers and if there is the change in Purchase types then  it should redetermine approvals based on new purchase types.
In our current scenario, if FA approver changes the product category then it leads the cart to buyer for sourcing.so now the requirement is if FA approver changes the product category it should not leads to buyer.
Please suggest your thoughts to proceed.
thanks,
sibi.

Hi,
Please check the BBP_WFL_SECURITY personalization key in personalization tab of PFCG or SU01 transaction.
BBP_WFL_SECUR_BADI is also available.
No authorization
Changes to the document are not allowed while it is being approved.
Low
Changes can be made to the document. The approval workflow is restarted after every change.
Medium
Changes can be made to the document. After every change, the approval workflow either continues or is restarted.
The system evaluates the start conditions and restarts the workflow if a new approval is required as a result of the change. If this is not the case, the approval workflow continues.
High
Changes can be made to the document. The current approval process always continues. A new approval workflow is not started when the document is changed.
Regards,
Masa

Similar Messages

  • Work order should not update the fields in PR

    Hi  Gurus
    My requirements is that workorder should not updates the purchasing data fields in PR  do not go to the shoping cart. How can make it possible.
    Thanks in Advance

    Hi,
          I am not sure of your requirement clearly but check up the below user exits :-
    COZF0001 Change purchase req. for externally processed operation
    COZF0002 Change purchase req. for externally procured component
    or BADI :- IWO1_PREQ_BADI BAdI for Manipulation of P.Reqs from Orders + Networks ,SE18
    regrds
    pushpa

  • After creation PO, pr changes should not be possible.

    Hi friends,
    our requirement is.......if PO is created by some PR....then
    after creation of PO PR changes should not be possible.
    How we can restrict this?
    Any message?
    Rgds,
    Navin

    You can add message 06 608 in  IMG ---> Material Management ---> Purchasing ---> Environment Data ---> Define Atributes of System Messages.
    if not already there.
    This message appears if one changes the quantity in a requisition for which a PO already exists.
    If you set the attribute to E for Error then the requistioner should not be able to change a PR anymore if PO exists.

  • In the Firefox browser, when i click button in ADF page, then popup  the OAF page in iframe tag,and then when i  click the PPR bean in  OAF page, then Firefox  browser reload to ADF page. This is not the right response,browser should not reload the ADF pa

    In the Firefox browser, when i click button in ADF page, then popup  the OAF page in iframe tag,and then when i  click the PPR bean in  OAF page, then Firefox  browser reload to ADF page. This is not the right response,browser should not reload the ADF page.It should stays in OAF page or goto another OAF page. and in other browser such ad IE,We get the right response.

    hello, normally such issues are caused by a firewall/security software which doesn't recognize & therefore blocks new firefox versions. please remove all program rules for firefox from your firewall and let it detect the new version of the browser again.
    [[Fix problems connecting to websites after updating Firefox]]

  • Payment run  - should not clear the open item but should post payment doc

    Hi Gurus,
    Can you please help me , on how to acheive like when payment run F110 post the payment doc it should not close the open item rather keep that open item as open item , but hsould be be paid by payment doc posted through payment run F110.
    Have any one of you had similar requirement ..? FICO gurus help me to acheiev this .. any exit /BADI ..or ideas..
    Appreciate your help in advance

    HI ,
    Thanks for your reply , but still I am not clear on that.
    reason they want to keep this open to be kept as open item , so that item will be picked up by dunning run ..
    Basically  the open invoice is being cleared by payment doc which was generated by payment run. If we look at BSEG in the open item record BSEG-AUGBL = will have the clearing doc number , and in addition to that BSEG will have created another record for the clearing doc as well .
    May be since open invoice record is being updated with clearing doc (AUGBL ) , I belive its not shown up as open item .
    Somehow this item should be kept as open item ... that is the req and also paid item payment reference should be transfered to Bill of exchange as well.
    Hope you have clear background of my req...
    Tnanks in advance ,

  • Query..for Field should not accept the manual entry

    i wann query for remarks Field in JE It should Not accept the manual entry it should accept only sys drop data.
    Thanks & Regards
    yogi

    For this field level authorization, you may only use SDK or SP to reach your goal.  SP would be difficult to use in this case.
    Thanks,
    Gordon

  • Slideshow on external Screen should not BLACKOUT the Internal

    Slideshow on external Screen should not BLACKOUT the Internal so i can continue to use the MacBook while a Slideshow is running ....
    at Present the LCD "turns off" when a Slideshow runs on the external Screen ...

    That is a different bug. I believe it has been previously reported. Seems there was something one could do, but don't recall.
    Check teh Forum FAQ and the one at
    LR Extras FAQ or search for 'blank screens slideshow' on the forum.
    Don
    Don Ricklin, MacBook 1.83Ghz Duo 2 Core running 10.4.9 & Win XP, Pentax *ist D
    http://donricklin.blogspot.com/

  • Has anybody ever had their security questions changed and not have the answers?

    Has anybody ever had their security questions changed and not have the answers for an ipod touch? I cannnot buy music or access my itunes account now. Thank you for any help or direction. Phone support and apple express was a deadend.

    See Kappy's previous discussion.
    HT5312 How to recover security...: Apple Support Communities

  • Delivery Qty. should not Exceed the PO Qty.

    Hi All
    My requirement is that just like Sales Order, incase of STO the delivery Quantity (delivery creayed through VL04) should not exceed the Balance Quantity PO quantity (where PO Quantity less Already delivered Qty = Balance Qty). Is there any standard customisation or Exit is available for this??
    Regards
    AA

    Dear AA
    I have searched in MM forum and found this thread which is relevant to your requirement
    Forum post in ERP - Logistics Materials Management (MM): STO - How to control Over delivery ?
    STO - How to control Over delivery ?
    Hope this helps you
    SAP has a logic for not controlling the over delivery in STO  in standard (unlike sales order  to delivery we have the controls in Zero VLP or 0VLP for this) because STO happens between plants of a same company code or different company codes .The movement of stocks are between plants But in a normal sales the delivery happens to a customer who is actually a third person and hence a user can misuse the delivery quantity
    A plant and an external customer cannot be treated as same
    Hence in SAP standards over delivery is not controlled in standard settings like item category etc
    Regards
    Raja

  • Sales order should not copy the net value from contract

    Hi,
    When we are creating the sales order,Where we can maintain that sales order should not copy the net value from contract.
    Regards
    Prabudh

    Hi,
    When I am creating the sales order with reference to contract,it's copying the net value and quantity from the contract.
    But I want  that sales order should not copy the net value and quantity from the contract and user can take new required quantity at the time creating the sales order.
    Regards
    Prabudh

  • User should not release the PR which is created by him

    Hi
    We didnu2019t use work flow functionality for PR Release. So same user can create PR and release the same PR in our system. Our requirement is user should not release the PR which is created by him. I would like to put this control in system.
    How can I achieve this requirement?
    Thanks
    Jeny

    Hi Ravi
    Thanks for your reply. but they need to have authroization for PR release . bec they are eligble to release PR as per delegation of authroity. but they should not release their own PR . they can relase other's PR within their level.
    Jeny.

  • Audio cd burn from 11.1 not playing on old version of iTunes on another MAC. error message was cd created on newer version of iTunes.  If the disk was a audio cd it should not matter the iTunes version.

    The error message was cd created on newer version of iTunes.  If the disk was a audio cd it should not matter the iTunes version. I converted all songs on playlist to MP3 and then selected burn playlist and checked audio cd. This worked in itunes 11.0.5. Also itunes 11.1 will not accept the second disk on a cd audio burn. It just keeps telling me to insert a blank disk, no matter how many blank disks are inserted

    I think that the operating system is 10.4.11 and iTunes isn't responding to this operating system. I cannot upgrade the operating system to a version any later than what it is as I think it would then go to Tiger.
    10.4 is Tiger, and 10.4.11 supports the latest version of iTunes and QuickTime. So either the system isn't at 10.4.11 - your original post said 10.4.1 - or there's something wrong with the system in which case earlier versions of iTunes/QuickTime might well also fail to install.
    Please confirm the version of Mac OS X that really is on the system and we'll go from there.

  • Approval Workflow does not update the Content Approval status if started automatically

    Hi,
    I’m using a simple Approval Workflow associated with
    Content Approval on site pages. It works fine when I set it to be started manually (by using
    Allow this workflow to be manually started by an authenticated user with Edit Item permissions
     option) and on the completion of the workflow the
    Content Approval status is updated accordingly. But when I set it to be started automatically (by using
    Start this workflow when a new item is created
     / Start this workflow when an item is changed
    options), it does not updates the Content Approval status. Note that I’ve set the
    Update the approval status after the workflow is completed (use this workflow to control content approval)
    option to true.
    Regards

    Hello,
    It is recommended to select "Start this workflow to approve publishing a major version of an item" when you want to use the workflow to manage content approval for
    a library.
    According to the Notes for “Enable Content Approval” option in
    this reference:
    If you are using this Approval workflow to manage content approval (moderation) for a library, and you selected the Start this workflow to approve publishing a major version
    of an item check box on the Add a Workflow page..
    If you did not select the Start this workflow to approve publishing a major version of an item check box on the Add a Workflow page because you do not want this workflow to
    be the default content approval workflow for a library, you can select the Update the approval status (use this workflow to control content approval) check box to make this workflow a secondary content approval workflow that specific users can
    start manually.
    That means having an approval workflow start automatically when a document is changed or created is not a good practice when you want to use the workflow to manage
    content approval for a library. You should either select "Start this workflow to approve publishing a major version of an item" or give users the option to start the workflow manually at the time they want to submit for an approval.
    Thanks & Regards.
    Lily Wu

  • Scheduling Agreement -Schedule line should not pass the requirement to MRP

    Hi Friends!
    As we all know the scheduling agreements is outline agreement with future schedule lines, with this system will  pass the requirements to MRP for the schedule line which is even after 5 years, so my requirement is  if the schedule line date is above 15 days from the current date then requirement should not pass to MRP. 
    solution which we gave is, SA initially will determine the schedule line category as  CN (which will not transfer the requirement) and  a batch job program will run daily and it will check for each schedule line if any of the schedule is with in the 15 days from the current date then it will change the schedule line category from CN to CP. 
    Now the problem is , by using Batch Job which program I have to call to change the schedule line category?????
    1. we tried BAPI_SALESORDER_CHANGE but when we are changing the CN to CP it is not performing ATP where as if we do manually it is performing.
    2. we tried BDC but here also we facing some strange problem i.e. while recording the ATP screen is not populating where it is coming while doing manual.
    Can someone let me know which one program we should call in Batch job to do this change.
    Regards
    Nath

    Hi nath,
    i also failed in changing shedule line category in userexit and in BAPI.
    in one case, i succeded in doing it with a bdc after MV45AFZZ / userexit_save just bevore the datas are reset but after the commit-work is processed.
    the other possibility is, to change the accepted amount in userexit RV03VFZZ / USEREXIT_AVAILABILITY_OUT.
    3. possibility is, to block the order with a delivery - block , same as the credit-control-block. This block can be set in MV45AFZZ or perhaps in BAPI too.
    hans

  • Actual dates should not impact the Network scheduled dates

    Hi
    I have planned schdeuled dates (Early/latest).
    When i am confirming the activity the actual dates get updated
    When i schedule the network the scheduled planned dates are recalulated
    This should not happen for this client i am working for
    The requirement is that the Planned Scheduled should remain fixed and
    should only change if duration, relationship etc changes.
    I have tried different option to solve this but still no clue
    Adjust basic date 1, 2, 3 option
    Shift Order
    No date Update - this seems to work but not visible in CN22/CN25/CJ20n
    Kindly highlight if any of you have come with similar requirement & provided solution to it
    Either thru standard functionality, configuration or any development
    Cheers

    Hi Manoj,
    I had the same requirement and able to achieve it by std. settings. Keep in mind that the planned dates wil get changed when you do the final confirmation. You should have the control on the planned dates until the activity get Fianlly confirmed.
    psconsultant

Maybe you are looking for