FAGL_YEC_POSTINGS_EHP4 with normal posting

Hi,
I´m running the report FAGL_YEC_POSTINGS_EHP4, but this program is posting new documents only with record type = 5, with this record type, I can´t see these documents in transactions FAGLL03, FAGLB03, FB10N...and others ordinary transacions. In this transactions the balance is not = zero, bacause this transactions not reconize documents with record type = 5.
I read a lot SAP articles regard repror FAGL_YEC_POSTINGS_EHP4 and I can´t remember have read a paragraph about posting documents with record type = 5. I believe all posting will be as normal posting, i.e. with record type = 0.
Does anybody can help me to fix this problem, bacause I activate the business function FIN_GL_CI_2?
Kind Regards
Egberto de M. Alves

Dear Ajeesh.s,
Thank you for your return.
In your opinion, this is the best transaction to use to post the YEC? I´m asking this because our user are familiarized with FAGLL03, FAGLB03, FS10N, etc. and these transactions doesn´t read documents with record type = 5, then the users will not see, in these transactions, the balance = zero.
Regards,
Egberto de M. Alves

Similar Messages

2lis_02_scl extract records with wrong posting date for Good Receipts.

Hi Experts,
We are currently having issue of mismatch between BW Schedule Line data with R/3 values for the Goods Receipts posting date updating incorrectly in to BW.
Example.
In table EKBE purchase order history we have following records.
MANDT EBELN        EBELP   ZEKKN VGABE GJAHR BELNR      BUZEI BEWTP BWART BUDAT      MENGE
501   5600453404   00010   00    1     2010 5012473031 0001 E     101   23.01.2010        1.250,000
501   5600453404   00010   00    1     2010 5012473031 0002 E     101   23.01.2010        1.250,000
501   5600453404   00010   00    1     2010 5012473031 0003 E     101   23.01.2010        1.250,000
501   5600453404   00010   00    1     2010 5012693310 0001 E     101   26.02.2010        1.250,000
Which means we have on posting date of 23.01.2010 1250*3 i.e. 3750 quantity of Goods Receipts.
However when we check the extractor we get multiple records in internal table C_T_DATA and in psa.
Line BWV ETENR   SLFDT              MENGE    ROCA BEDAT                            BUDAT          EBELN
       ORG                                                        NCEL
1     001     0001     20100125     3750.000          20100113     ZNB     F     00000000     5600453404
2     001     0002     20100226     1250.000          20100113     ZNB     F     00000000     5600453404
3     002     0001     20100125     3750.000     X     20100113     ZNB     F     20100123     5600453404
4     002     0001     20100125     3750.000          20100113     ZNB     F     20100123     5600453404
5     003     0001     20100125     3750.000     X     20100113     ZNB     F     20100127     5600453404
6     003     0001     20100125     3750.000          20100113     ZNB     F     20100127     5600453404
7     002     0001     20100125     3750.000     X     20100113     ZNB     F     20100226     5600453404
8     002     0001     20100125     3750.000          20100113     ZNB     F     20100226     5600453404
9     002     0002     20100226     1250.000     X     20100113     ZNB     F     20100226     5600453404
As can be seen we have record no 8 for ETENR (Schedule line 1) with posting date 26.02.2010 and another record with posting date 23.01.2010.
Since we are getting 2 records the record with incorrect posting date overwrites the record with correct one.
Any idea if this could be a standard extractor problem or any other way to resolve this issue.
Any help would be appreciated.

First of all, are you using a staging DSO? (You should ideally)
If yes, is it a Write Optimized DSO? (Again, this is ideal)
If its a standard DSO, the values maybe over-writing upon activation.
You have 3 records (quantity = 1250 * 3) that have been receipted on 23.01.2010, where Posting Date = 23.01.2010.
You also have a record (quantity = 1250 * 1) that has been receipted on 26.01.2010. Posting date = 26.01.2010.
Now, in RSA3 & in PSA you can see more records than intended.
This is because you have before & after images. (ROCANCEL = X or blank).
ROCANCEL = X --> Before Image (record before change)
ROCANCEL = blank --> After Image (record after change)
This is a standard property of the extractor.
Now, we also have something known as BWVORG (Process Keys). Each process, i.e. creating a PO, Goods Receipt, Invoice etc.. have different Process Keys.
Creation - 001
Goods Rcpt. - 002
Invoice - 003
We can see that record 8, i.e. BWVORG = 002 (GR) has been modified on 26.01.2010.
That is why there is before image and after image.
Which one should be the correct posting date? 23.01.2010?
Normally in a Write optimized DSO, you will have all the records (before and after images & others as well).
I hope this helps.
Please let me know if otherwise.

Why my phone's Android apps not work with normal ph data connections???

After 10.3.1.1779 update my phone Q5 had facing lots prblms... at first I can't download anything from amazon app store with normal deta connection, 2nd android apps not work with normal mobile deta connection its always need wifi, 3rd mobile search engine not worked properly and also contact books always show no contacts after restarts it's fixed bt some time later it's starts again... and pls give update for facebook.... plssss plssss blackberry fix those problem.....

Can I see your /var/log/Xorg.0.log through Pastebin?

FPBW: Extract Open Items with a posting date in the future

Dear all,
I'm are currently searching for possibilities to extract Open Items with a posting date in the future from SAP IS-U 4.72 into SAP BW 3.5.
Currently I'm using the Business Content extractor 0FC_OP_01 together with the mass transaction FPBW in IS-U.
The problem I'm facing is within the mass transaction FPBW. I've have set the key date at 01.11.2007, but this job already runs for 52.000 seconds on the same database select-statement.
Does anybody know a possible solution to improve the performance of the statement below? (I pasted it from the process overview)
================================
SELECT
/*+
INDEX("DFKKOP" "DFKKOP~1" "DFKKOP^1" "DFKKOP____1" "DFKKOP____1__X" "DFKKOP_1")
"BETRH" , "BETRW" , "BUDAT" , "BUKRS" , "FAEDN" , "GPART" , "GSBER" , "INKPS" , "SPART" , "VKONT" ,
"WAERS" , "MAHNV" , "ABWBL" , "APPLK" , "AUGBD" , "AUGBL" , "AUGBT" , "AUGDT" , "AUGRD" , "AUGST" ,
"AUGWA" , "BLART" , "BLDAT" , "EMGPA" , "GRKEY" , "HVORG" , "MANSP" , "MWSKZ" , "OPBEL" , "OPSTA" ,
"OPUPK" , "PERSL" , "PYMET" , "QSSHB" , "SBETW" , "SPZAH" , "STUDT" , "TVORG" , "VTREF" , "XBLNR" ,
"XMANL" , "HKONT" , "OPUPZ" , "OPUPW" , "STAKZ" , "WHGRP" , "AUGBS" , "XANZA" , "XRAGL" , "ABWTP" ,
"ASTKZ"
FROM
"DFKKOP"
WHERE
"MANDT" = :A0 AND "AUGST" = :A1 AND "GPART" BETWEEN :A2 AND :A3 AND ( "AUGDT" = :A4 OR "AUGDT" > :A5
AND ( "BUDAT" <= :A6 OR "AUGBD" <= :A7 ) OR "WHGRP" <> :A8 AND "OPUPW" = :A9 )
ORDER BY
"AUGST" , "GPART"#
=================================
I have already tried to create an index on the following fields (in the same order):
- MANDT           Client
- AUGST           Clearing status
- GPART           Business Partner Number
- AUGDT           Clearing date
- BUDAT           Posting Date in the Document
Any help would be appreciated!
Thanks in advance,
Steven Groot

Hi Marcos,
When you have created the Restricted keyfigures for Open Items, You have to add the date characteristic on which you are looking open item and add the variable there.Here you have to use a variable of type Interval and select the operator "<" the date of the Variable.If you go through, there are standard variable for keydate, which you can use directly.
Hope you got the idea
Regards
Happy Tony

Issue with the Posting Date of the Purchase Order.

Hi All,
There are fields in BW like SSL1: Time OK, SSL2: Qty OK, SSL3: Time & Qty Ok, SSL4: Days Late (Routines are written to calculate). These fields will indicate whether the delivery against a GR is OK or not with respect to Time, Quantity and the No. of Days..
But here the issue I am facing is
If there is only1 delivery/ GR against a single item the calculation in BW are correct - i.e. for a particular PO if there is only one delivery the above fields like SSL1: Time Ok, SSL2: Qty OK will show like the delivery is done within the specified time and everything is OK (in case if it is delivered within the allotted time)
But if there are multiple deliveries or multiple GR's posted for one PO item, the calculations are going wrong i.e. even if the delivery is done well within the specified time it is showing the wrong calculations like it is delievered too late. Because in this case the earlier dates are overwritten.
Can anyone throw me some light on how can I go about solving this issue.
I am thinking of declaring the Posting Date as the KeyField of the DSO as of now it is a Data field I also want to know the impact of assigning this as a Keyfield.
Thanks in advance,
Prasapbi

Hi,
As I understand, you have a DSO based on Purchase Order and your key field is PO and its line item. The problem as you stated will always be there if you have multiple deliveries/GRs created for a single line item because the system will overwrite the entries for same key.
Problem with adding Posting date as keyfield will be that then your key will be PO-PO Lineitem-Date. When PO will be created, the Posting date will be blank(correct me here if I am wrong), therefore you will have one entry for same PO-line item combination. One without date and other with date, which again would be incorrect. If my assumption about Posting date was wrong, even then your data may not be correct because then you may have many entries with same posting date which again would overwrite each other.
If there is any direct link between PO line item and number of deliveries that will get created for them, then you can bring that field in DSO as keyfield. But I don't think there is any such field.
Looking at your report requirement, I would suggest that you make a DSO based on Goods Receipts and then calculate these keyfigures by comparing the dates between GR posting date and PO line item date.
Else you can change the way your datasource works(if its generic one based on function module). Since your main requirement is to check whether the GR posting date has met your SLA or not, you should fetch all the details only when GR is created and make your key field as PO-PO Line item-GR

Problem with depreciation posting for an asset with a '0' net book value.

Hi,
I have a problem with depreciation posting on one asset. I think it should not be calculated and posted at all.
On 1st November 2010 (our Fiscal year starts on 1st November) there was acquisition posted to an asset and then it was reversed on the same day - so the net book value was '0'.
In AFAB depreciation run for April 2011 - it posted depreciatoion of 0.01 Euro, so now the book value is -0.01.
Do you know how this could have happened and what can I do to get the value of this asset back to 0?
Thank you,
Karol

Hi Murlidhar,
Thank you for your reply.
I just have one doubt - as depreciation of 0.01 Eur was posted in previous period leaving net value of asset equal to -0.01 Eur.
Shouldn't I get ritd of this asset value before I proceed with the steps you suggested?
I think it is not possible to reverse the depreciation - so I struggle to find a way to bring asset value back to zero.
Thank you,
Karol

Payment run with future posting date

Hi,
There might be a straight forward answer to this question, but for some reason I cannot get it to work the way I believe it should work!
Instead of processing payment runs every day we want to create the payment run only twice a week. However the value date in the payment instruction to the bank should be the actual due date of each invoice. This could result in 2 payment lines to one supplier.
I have found that by setting the indicator "Payment per due date" in the payment method it will generate these 2 payment lines.
The problem is that we also want the clearing document to be split into 2 documents each with the posting date to be equeal to the value date - for some reason I cannot get this to work?
I have looked at substitutionrules and activating an enhancement, but looks like is not possible.
I would have thought this is a standard requirement, but ?
Thanks for helping

Hi,
It seems to be that you have to create 2 payment runs.
Regards,
Svetlin

Background FI Posting with clearing, posting key control, etc - How?

I have the requirement to post FI documents with clearing, with defined posting keys, where some of the fields come from file, some of them defaulted. It should happen in the background.
I used BAPI BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST. I had the posting key problem, however with Badi ACC_DOCUMENT using EXTENSION2 I managed to generate the FI docs with the right posting keys.
Now I have problem with clearing. It seems with this BAPI it's not possible to trigger clearing.
I found some threads about FM 'POSTING_INTERFACE_CLEARING', however I don't think I can have any influence on the posting key and generated line items. So it doesn't help to me.
FM BAPI_PAYM_ITEM_POST_CLEARING is for payments.
Using program RFBIBL00 would be difficult, as far as I can see it can only use file in the specific format as an input.
I should read my file and generate another file and call this program. This wouldn't be really the best approach.
In this moment the only solution I can think of is transaction recorder/call transaction approach. Unfortunately this solution would be really release-customizing dependent and not performance-optimized.
Any other idea?
Thanks in advance,
Peter

Hi Rob,
Thanks for your answer.
In one of the sap standard batch program I found FM FI_PSO_DOC_DIRECT_INPUT. I'll give a try, it might help also.
Best regards,
Peter

How to save entries in Cash Journal with status 'Posted'?

Hi all,
I has been asked to create entries in a Cash Journal with status 'POSTED'. Obviously, FM 'BAPI_CASHJOURNALDOC_CREATE' only saves entry (status 'SAVED'), but didn't change its status to 'POSTED'.
After some investigation of different FM in a CJ area, I found the only way to change status via CALL TRANSACTION 'FBCJ' -> 'POST ALL' (for receipts, for example). This is not a decition I'm searching for.
My question is: how can I change status of a Cash Journal single entry to 'Posted'?
Any help would be highly appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Ivaylo Mutafchiev
Senior SAP ABAP Consultant
VBS EOOD
Varna, Bulgaria

I'm facing the same issue . have you been able to solve it ???

A page with a post method form is not opening in PageViewer web part

Hi,
I wanted to display a page in the Page Viewer web part. So, i gave the URL of the page in the Page Viewer web part.
The page is rendered as expected.
Now, the page has a link when clicked opens another page which has a form with a post method. The issue is the page with the form is not opening. I want the page to open and function as expected.
Any suggestions?

Hello Raghavendra_RT,
Is that page on SharePoint, or is that on the internet?
If the second is the case I would just use a hyperlink which opens in a new tab via target blank attribute:
http://www.w3schools.com/tags/att_a_target.asp
And you can place it in a content editor web part.
Btw, with SharePoint 2013 you can use the Script Editor Web Part to embed a form from a source like Survey Monkey:
http://community.bamboosolutions.com/blogs/sharepoint-2013/archive/2013/05/20/how-to-use-script-editor-web-part-in-sharepoint-2013.aspx
- Dennis | Netherlands | Blog |
Twitter

Clearing with out posting

Hi,
I am doing overpayment for a contract in CML. I want to generate a clearing document with out posting to clear
existing open items.
Could you please me and let me know if you want any other details.
Thanks
Gowri.

Hi gowrishankar Malyala,
your quaetion should be discussed with an accountant first. The secret of accounting is that every posting consists of a number of (at least 2) items, i.e. an achievement posted negative and a payment claim positive. This payment claim appears as open item. This may be involved in the follow-up clearing posting. The clearing may be triggered by a payment or a write-off. The clearing document has (at leas) the initial open item (payment claim) and clearing item, i.e. the payment.
So the question remains what your aim is in business accounting terms.
You may cancel the same way as you post: Just reverse the signs of all items amounts an set the cancel indicator.
There are BAPIs that will do everything for you, just give the number of the document to cancel an a cancel reason.
Regards,
Clemens

Custom Headers with LrHttp.post?

I am using custom HTTP headers in my application and this works
great with LrHttp.get. However, LR doesn't send anything when I try to do this with LrHttp.post.
My code looks like the following:
            local customHdrs = {
                { field="XXX", value="yyy" }
            local data, hdrs = LrHttp.get(url, customHdrs)
            data, hdrs = LrHttp.post(url, xxx, customHdrs)
Any ideas? Has anyone used custom HTTP headers with post before?
Thanks!

Hi,
I've used standard headers with LrHttp.postMultipart, but not custom headers with LrHttp.post. Could you try using LrHttp.postMultipart instead to see if it has any more luck for you than LrHttp.post?
Also have you tried using something like Fiddler2 to intercept the HTTP traffic and confirm whether or not the headers were sent with the request?
Matt

HT2490 Is there a way to change the USPS Trcking information (Track Shipment) to track with Canada Post?

When I order something online, they send a tracking number in an email. When I hover over the number, it offers to track the package for me and opens up in USPS. I am Canadian, and would like to use this option, but with Canada Post.
When I click it now, of course USPS can not find the tracking information so I must copy and paste the number in to Canada Post's website. Not a huge deal, but it would be really great to have the shortcut option that American's have.
Thanks for any help!

Odds are the installer is a 16-bit program from the DOS or Windows-95 era; they won't run on 64-bit Windows. I've been trying to get Carmageddon running on my laptop and while the program itself seems to be 32-bit I can't install it because the installer appears to be 16-bit.
If it's not CPU-intensive and you have an old Windows 95/98 serial and CD available then you could try installing the version of Windows in a program like VirtualBox; I was able to run Carmageddon that way, but it was too slow to be playable.

Cannot reverse document with future posting date

Hi,
When I tried to reverse a document with future posting date, system gives error F5362 Posting date must not be smaller than XX.XX.XXXX (x = future posting date).
Is it possible to do this in SAP?

Hello,
You need to use reversal reason configured accordingly.
Configure the reversal reason for your purpose:
IMG => Financial Accounting => Business Transactions => Adjustment Posting / Reversal / Define Reasons for Reversal
Make SURE that you have ticked Alt.Pos.dt (Alternative Posting Date) check box.
Save it.
Now use this reversal reason for your posting and give a fugure date.
Make sure that the future posting period is opened but NOT closed.
Please also read F1 on alternative posting date check box:
Indicator: Alternative posting date allowed
Indicator as to whether you are allowed to specify an alternative posting date for the relevant reversal reason.
Use
When you use the reversal reason, the system checks that reversal is not carried out using an alternative posting date and therefore possibly in a later posting period or in a later fiscal year.
Examples
If you want to use negative postings during reversal but only if the reversal is posted in the same period, you can define two reversal reasons:
1st reason: No alternative date allowed, generate negative posting
2nd reason: Alternative date allowed, do not generate negative posting
Regards,
Ravi

Working with HTTP-POST Submit Button

I've created a form that uses a submit button with HTTP-POST. I've tested this against a script that displays the fields, however, I'd like to table the posted data to SQL. Can someone show me some code to parse this data with CGI, or PHP?

Yes. At some point you will need to prarse the requests and treat them differently - because a POST is NOT the same as a GET.
Anyway, just place the variables or script-links to the variables in an HTML Form.
Very easy stuff.

FAGL_YEC_POSTINGS_EHP4 with normal posting

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for