Fagll03 issue

Hi All
Greetings for the day
I have a issue in New Gl while running a specific varaiant in Fagll03 used to display documents wherein it it is running fine for leading ledger, but for non leading ledger there in a performance issue and it is not ending at all.
For Leading Ledger(i1) even if i give Multiple profit centres it gives quick result. But for non-leading ledger if i give single profit center in fagll03 it gives quick results but the problem is if i give more than one profit center in fagll03 it goes on processing and it never ends we do not able to find the solution in our team.
Even these tables also FAGLFLEXT & FAGLFLEXA gives quick results
even i tried oss notes 1391665, 1361304 in this note everything about p & l accounts and b/s sheet accounts no where it say about profit cnetres.
Please help me in this situation
Thanks in advance
Chandana koduru

HI Chetan
Thanks for your Reply
For this issue the only solution is implementing this oss note only or is there any solution like any transaction code or path something that can helps to display the documents in New g/l other than fagll03
If you know this Please help me
Thanks a lot
Regards,
chandana

Similar Messages

Issue with report FAGLL03

Hi
I have an issue with the SAP report FAGLL03. There is a document posted in the system with the posting date in previous year but document date in the current year. I can see this document in the document display and BSEG but when I go to FAGLL03, I cannot find this document. Can someone please help me in figuring out where the problem is?
I appreciate your help.

Hi Everyone
Thanks for helping me to analyze and resolve this issue. I appreciate all the timely help provided by you all. We already had line item display activated in the GL account but in the table SKB1, there was a slash next to the field Clearing specific to GL group and we had to remove that selection programatically. Once we did that, we were able to see the postings corresponding to this accout though no historical data was displayed. We do have this setting for many other accounts. I am not sure why this setting was made in the first place and what would be the impact of removing it.
Any ideas would be helpful.
Thanks,
Shalu
Edited by: Shalu G on Dec 7, 2009 4:07 AM

FAGLL03 variant issue

Hi Sap Team Members,
The Transaction FAGLL03 variant that runs for I1 with no trouble but never finishes for L1 & L2 is "AZLChk4CorpStf". in sap new G/l
When we run this transaction code it runs fast for leading ledger, but for non leading ledgers it is not finishing when we give multiple profit centres .if we give single profit center its gives results fast.
So please help me in this issue if anybody faced the issue before.
tell me alternate way to display line items or else tell me what could be reasons for getting this reasons .i.e where we made mistake.
Thanks in Advance
Chandana

Hi Chandana,
Have you reviewed the note "1391665 FAGLL03: Performance w/ reconc. accts or non-LI/OI accts"?
Other notes about performance
1384389 FAGLB03: Performance during drilldown (entry view)
1402209 FAGLB03: Performance not optimal when selecting balances
1361304 FAGLL03: Too much data selected in external call
Hope this helps.
Kind Regards
Soumya

Unable to view entries in FAGLL03 for Zero Balance Clearing Account

Hi experts,
We are facing a unique problem. We are not able to view the line items of the Zero Balance clearing account. The master data of the G/L has been activated for line items but still the display of the items is not happening. I am getting the foll message:
Account 19900000, company code 1100 is clearing account
Message no. MSITEM111
Diagnosis
You have stored account 19900000 in company code 1100 as a clearing account. At the same time, you use line item management with this account.
System Response
Error message issued because line item display cannot read data for an account in a ledger if line items exist partially in the entry view together with clearing items for which there are no line items. In such cases, only the data with line items would be selected.
Procedure
Check the Customizing settings or account control. Change the settings so that only automatic postings without line items can be made to the account, or select a different account as the clearing account.
Regards,
Sateesh

Hi
In splitting case you need not the give the line item display tab for Zero Balance Clearing Account.
Just remove that line item display in FS00 for Zero Balance account. You could be able to see the entries in FAGLL03
Regards
Sandeep

Line items are not showing in fbl3n,fs10n,faglb03,fagll03

hi experts,
i am facing a problem to see the line item of inter unit clearing a/c. i am not able to see the line items in fbl3n,fs10n,fagll03 and faglb03. system response is "You have stored account 300000 in company code L001 as a clearing account. At the same time, you use line item management with this account" and"Error message issued because line item display cannot read data for an account in a ledger if line items exist partially in the entry view together with clearing items for which there are no line items. In such cases, only the data with line items would be selected"
i do not understand the system response. can anyone please help me to solve this problem?
thanks &regards
konishko

sir
thanks for your reply. as per your suggestion i am trying to change in fs00 to uncheck the line item management but i am unable to do that,system shows that i have to uncheck the open item managemt also but the said account contain the open item. so i am not able to change the same. is there any other way to do that. can you please suggest me in detail? and one more thing that i am able to see only the balaces in fs10n. but not able to see the line item.this is probably for missing the business area in line item.
but i needs to see the line items.
can you please tell me any alternate way in detail to solve this problem?
thanks and regards
konishko

Vendor name and Vedor number in FAGLL03

Hi All,
My Client is running report for GR/IR, T-code FAGLL03, they want to see Vendor name and Vendor number columns in the report. I searched forums and got the answer for Vendor number but not clear
My questions are
1. I added field LIFNR in BSEG table in the SPRO and am able to see the vendor colum. If I transport to Test system, will I be able to see the vendor column? (in forums some one mentioned that they are not able to see the vendor column when they transport to Test system) they have been asked to run this program BALVBUFDEL, So I am concerned about this issue and want to know exactly what are the things that need to be done, what programs have to be run before transporting to Test system?
Also we are using ECC 6.0 and the highest support package present in the system is SAPKGPAD15. So I dont think I need to install the OSS note 1034354, I checked the OSS note and the highest APPL level is 604? but just making sure about this Patch level and OSS note.
2. Second, how to get the Vendor name cloumn in the report?
Could someone give me solution? your help will be really appreciated.
Thanks,
Harter
Edited by: Harter21 on Nov 8, 2009 2:57 AM
Edited by: Harter21 on Nov 8, 2009 2:58 AM

Hi Sanjay,
Thanks for the reply. I understood that we get Vendor number from the Function module ITEM_STRUC_EXTENSION and when you run that FM it updates the vendor number in the Structure FAGLPOSYEXT. I want to have Vendor name side to Vendor number field. Can I get vendor name also from the same FM?
I have tried in BSIS table and other OSS notes that are mentioned in that forum link but none of the OSS notes mentioned about the Vendor name and the vendor name is coming from LFA1 table and that has no connection with FAGLL03 report as far as I understand (correct me if I am wrong).
If you have any idea please throw some light.
Thank you very much,
Harter.

Authorization issue after the Support packs upgrade

We're having problem on authorization issue after the SP upgrade.
One issue if "You are not authorized to call up line item display" using FCH1 and FS10N tcodes.
And the SU53 showing problem on S_TCODE FAGLL03.
How are we going to solve this issue? We dont want to add this missing auth object on all our finance roles.
Thank you in advance.

How can i send you the trace file? What is your email address?
If I were you, I won't do that. Did you not ever sign some confidentiality agreement? I wonder.
Anyhoo... (copy right @ David)
What are the objects been caught in category RC=4, RC=12?
Relate them with functional aspect of the transaction (error screen)
Edited : You can paste RC=4, RC=12 objects here without customer specific value if you want to.
Regards,
Arpan Paik
Edited by: P Arpan on Aug 23, 2011 2:36 PM

Runtime error while executing Tcode FAGLL03

Hello experts
we have 2 clients in PRD
100,200
In 100 if i execute the tcode FAGLL03 it is showing the line items within 100 sec.
where as in 200 if i execute FAGLL03 it is showing runtime error.
if this executed in background it takes 1300 sec and finished successfully.
From basis perspective what would be the issue.
Regards
Ravi

Hello srini
Thanks for ur input
Details
Recording at local and central time........................ 06.05.2009 14:03:30
Task................ 07522 / Dialog work process No. 00
User................ DEVAKUMAR
Client.............. 200
Terminal............ H2SBASIS
Session............. 1
Transaction code.... FAGLL03
Program name........ FAGL_ACCOUNT_ITEMS_GL
Problem class....... T    Transaction Problem
Development class... SABP
Further details for this message type
Module name......... abinit
Line................ 1890
Error text.......... ab_chstat
Documentation for system log message AB 0 :
The specified runtime error has occurred in the system.
Parameter
a.. TIME_OUT
Technical details
File................ 000989
Position............ 0000261540
Entry type.......... l      ( Error (Module, Row)            )
Message ID.......... AB 0
Variable parts...... ab_chstat                                           abinit 1890
this is the log got from SM21.
The runtime error is time out error
Regards
Ravi

Cost center after settlement in FAGLL03 REPORT

we have process of material issue thru maintennce order. after issuing material FI entry is on respective gl and maintence order
in report fagll03 we can see this combination and then after settlement of cost of order on cost center we are not able to see cost center in report fagll03.
is it possible to get cost center after settlement in this report.
if no then how can we see cost center / gl / material report for maintence orders.

You can't able to see the cost center report until settle the maintenance order to cost center with secondary cost element.
after settlement also you can't see in FAGLL03, you can see only cost center report with secundry cost element

FAGLL03 Special Field Values Do Not Display in Production

We are using the new GL in ECC 6. I have a strange problem where special fields that were added to the line item transactions display in dev and quality but not in production. Please read the steps that I have taken.
1. Using note 984305 we defined special field BSEG-MATNR using this path:
Financial Accounting (New)
General Ledger Accounting (New)
    Master Data
      G/L Accounts
        Line Items
          Define Special Fields for Line Item Display
This field (U_MATNR) displays correctly in FAGLL03.
2. I used note 1034354 to create an implementation of BAdI 'FAGL_ITEMS_CH_DATA. Then I
followed the documentation of the BAdI to create structure CI_FAGLPOSX within FAGLPOSX and added these fields:
Material Type: field MARA-MTART
Material Group: MARA-MATKL
I added code to method CHANGE_ITEMS to read for those fields. Here's part of the code:
* MARA - Get Material Type and Material Group
    SELECT SINGLE mtart matkl
      FROM mara
      INTO (wa_items-zzmtart, wa_items-zzmatkl)
      WHERE matnr = wa_items-u_matnr.
The values of these fields display correctly in development and quality, but they do not display in production.
3. When I debugged FAGLL03 in development I found that the value of U_MATNR was filled when I stopped at method CHANGE_ITEMS. However, when I debugged in production, U_MATNR was not filled. It had to be filled at a later time because the value appears on the report. In my code, I am using U_MATNR to find the values of material type and material group. Because U_MATNR doesn't have a value at that point in time in production, my code doesn't find material type or material group.
4. I contacted SAP and was instructed to use note 984305. I executed the function module
ITEM_STRUC_EXTENSION which did not help.
5 I also used note 205096 to execute report BALVBUFDEL, but this did not help either.
6. At this point, SAP told me that it is a consulting issue. I'm not sure that it is because I'm using SAP solutions without modifying anything.
7. I tried to compare configuration between development and production, but everything looked OK to me.
Has anyone had this problem? Any tips?
Brenda

Hi Brenda,
>
Brenda Bankert wrote:
> 6. At this point, SAP told me that it is a consulting issue. I'm not sure that it is because I'm using SAP solutions without modifying anything.
I have no idea except that you can make sure Include CI_FAGLPOSX is active as well as the including FAGLPOSX. And please check the transport protocol(s) if CI_FAGLPOSX is included. If you have any kind of error/warning in the import protocol, that may give you a hint.
If nothing helps, create a new sap support case and tell them you are using SAP solutions without modifying anything.
Regards,
Clemens

Additional Field in FAGLL03

Dear Experts,
We want to add new field in FAGLL03. There are so many OSS note issue by SAP. Is anybody can provide sequence of notes for adding field in FAGLL03. We are on ECC 5.0
Please provide anybody have the same.
Thanks & Regards,
Kalpik Shah

hi
check this note
Note 945932 - FAGLL03: Enhancing dynamic selections with certain fields
it clearly gives you the steps to add a field to fagll03
Regards
Sach!n

GL account issue

Hi
I am having issue with a GL account. It is a P&L type of account. When I post document using this G/L account, I can see the line items posted in the report FAGLL03 in one company code but if I use the same account for posting in another company code, I don't see the line item detail corresponding to that legal entity in FAGLL03. I have compared the master data for this account in both the legal entities and could not see any difference.
I would appreciate if someone can help me decipher the problem.

I tried to compare the same G/L account in 2 legal entities (account is displaying line items for one entity whereas in second legal entity, we don't see items posted in FAGLL03). The FS00 settings were similar but when I go to the table SKB1, I see the indicator set-up for the field "Ledger group specific clearing). The options are X for Yes and blank for No but in the set-up, I see / as indicator. When we removed the indicator using a program, I could see the item detail for this account in FAGLL03. The issue is that there are so many other GL accounts set-up like this and I am not sure why do we have this indicator and what would be the impact of removing it.
Please advise.

Difference in S_ALR_87012172 & FAGLL03

Hi Gurus,
We have an issue that total balance of the two reports S_ALR_87012172 & FAGLL03 are not matching. This is because of alternative recon.account maintained with respect to GL maintained in customer master. Therefore, whenever posting done from SD side, alternative recon,account getting hit and altemately this alternative recon.account amount reflecting in main GL account which is maintained in customer master in the S_ALR_87012172(customer balances in local currency) only. This is not the case for FAGLL03 report, hence there is difference in the report balances. But now my concern is I would like to add a "GL account"field in the dynamic selection screen of report S_ALR_87012172, so that user can view both GL accounts balances separately(please see the attached screen shot for better understanding)
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
Please note that transaction code S_ALR_87012172 shows customer balances and FAGLL03 shows G/L balances. In FAGLL03 it shows all the customer documents posted to that G/L (reconciliation account).
You are requested to compare S_ALR_87012172 and FD10N. Please refer below screen shots.
1. S_ALR_87012172
2. FD10N
Hope this solves your issue else revert.
Regards,
Tejas

FAGLL03 doesn't display functional areas

Dear All,
Whenever we run the FAGLL03- Display GL line item report, it's not displaying the functional area value for some line items (for some it displays), even though the original posted document shows the functional area value. I would appreciate if anyone provides solution for this issue.
Thanks in Advance........
Arun

Hi Arun,
Check if note 1151397 is applied. Then check point 52 of note 1070629.
The functional area is determined as in classic General Ledger
Accounting. That is, the functional area characteristic is not
determined until documents are saved.
By default, after activation of New General Ledger, the reports only
read the tables for New GL Accounting if the the indicator 'read
from Classical GL' is not set in table FAGL_ACTIVEC.
I hope this helps. I'm taking a guess here since I don't know your system.
Regards,
Lucas

Cost center missing in FAGLFLEXT, FAGLL03

Hi Friends,
I have some Material / Production order documents coming from MM / PP module to FI, which posted with CO objects - cost center & Internal order. When it comes to table FAGLFLEXT, I am not able to see the cost center, wherever Internal order is there. But the document is posted to both cost center & Internal order.
The documents which not posted with an order, showing the cost center properly. But the documents posted with both cost center & order not showing the cost center in FAGLFLEXT table / FAGLL03.
Please give me the possible reasons for this issue and help me to get this cost center in FAGLFLEXT. table.
Thanks
Kanna

Hi Kanna,
Here it can be different reasons:
1) Cost center is statistical.
When the cost center is statistical assignment, the New GL doesn't take into consideration.
Please check note 964686 that explains this common issue:
"Subsequent CO processes (assessment, distribution) only take non-statistical account assignments into account. These subsequent processes in CO can create follow-on documents in FI within the real-time integration of CO to FI. These follow-on documents are based on primary postings. If primary FI processes of the new general ledger also contain statistical account assignments, the direct posting of CO to FI for the assessment will return non-statistical postings in FI and not primary (statistical) account assignments."
In the classical GL only the integration from FI to CO and not from CO to FI was available. Therefore this issue has not been relevant for classical GL. For the New GL this can be very critical.
2) You have not assigned the scenario for your ledger.
Please check if the field 'Cost Center' (RCNTR) is in your system in table FAGLFLEXT.
Please check the scenarios for your ledger. You may need the scenario for business area (scenario FIN_COS).
In order to get this field populated you have to activate the scenario for Cost Center in the implementation guide.
You get further information in the documentaion under
General Ledger Accounting (FI-GL) (New)
Ledgers
Making Settings for Ledgers
Unfortunately only old transactions which read the entry view (BSEG) can view the statistical account assignments in the reporting. But I'd like to say more about this:
The 'Entry view' takes its value from table BSEG, however, the 'General ledger view' takes the value from table FAGLFLEXA these created 'Customer fields' will not automatically show in this view IF they have not been assigned to your ledger in your customizing (IMG).
So, the 'Customer fields' only appear in the tables FAGLFLEXA and FAGLFLEXT if they previously have been generated into the table via txn FAGL_GINS.
If a value is filled for a Line Item in the Cost center field in table BSIS/BSAS, but not in table FAGLFLEXA, then you should be able to see the Cost Center filled in Entry view in FAGLL03, but not in G/L view.
However, in order to see the actual values of these fields now in the 'General ledger view' in the FI document (FB03) as well as in the New G/L line item display (FAGLL03), you will have to assign your 'Customer fields' to your ledger first!
Maybe this is currently not done in your customizing (IMG):
Transaction SPRO -> Financial Accounting (New) - Financial Accounting Basic Settings
(New) - Ledgers - Ledger - Assign Scenarios and Customer Fields to
Ledgers: -> choose the relevant ledger (e.g. 0L) -> go to 'Customer
Fields'
-> Please assign the customer fields to your ledger in IMG!
I hope that this answer your inquiry.
Best Regards,
Vanessa Barth.

Fagll03 issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for