Fail to keepalive failover on message duration

Hello every one. thank you for your response before. Today's problem is
KEEPALIVE.
For wire disconnect failover test.
Two HP servers on single Forte environment( version R30F2 ).
Hp's keep alive karnel parameter is default as two hours.
Forte's environment configuration for keep alive is within two minutes.
On central server has one router partition and two load balance partitions.
Secondary server is the same configuration.
I start the application up by application outline on Econsole.
After that, I access to server from win95 client. then the message
is sent to the central server.
I force to be off line the application on the central server for BACKUP
,then
following messages are sent to the secondary server.
I cut line between central server and secondary server.
The client is freezing until keepalive time.
However, after keepalive timeout, the client request does not success to
send to the central server. I expect the request will wake the
application up
and normally process it on the central server(for back up).
That is the fail over I think.
Forte writes some messages to the client after keepalive timeout like this.
Form bottom the nessage sequence
1. CLOSE CONNECTION BY KEEP ALIVE TIMEOUT.
2. FORTE attempts to retry to connect because the request is message
duration.
3. Distributed access exception 'the router does not have available
members'
4. same as 2.
5. same as 3.
Also,on message 3 includes description 'the router does not have
available members'.
Does 'the router' mean central server or not?
If the central server's one is why cannot wake the off line router
partition up ?
If secondary server's one is why Forte attempts to request to disconnect
partition
because Forte disconnect partition himself by keepalive timeout?
OR once I force to be off line partition,Forte failover ability is
cancelled?
(I think it isn't because case of software failover succeeds. this case
belong to
hardware failover problem and relation to TCP/IP low level protocol or
Forte
keepalive protocol )
Have you ever experienced?
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>

Hello every one. thank you for your response before. Today's problem is
KEEPALIVE.
For wire disconnect failover test.
Two HP servers on single Forte environment( version R30F2 ).
Hp's keep alive karnel parameter is default as two hours.
Forte's environment configuration for keep alive is within two minutes.
On central server has one router partition and two load balance partitions.
Secondary server is the same configuration.
I start the application up by application outline on Econsole.
After that, I access to server from win95 client. then the message
is sent to the central server.
I force to be off line the application on the central server for BACKUP
,then
following messages are sent to the secondary server.
I cut line between central server and secondary server.
The client is freezing until keepalive time.
However, after keepalive timeout, the client request does not success to
send to the central server. I expect the request will wake the
application up
and normally process it on the central server(for back up).
That is the fail over I think.
Forte writes some messages to the client after keepalive timeout like this.
Form bottom the nessage sequence
1. CLOSE CONNECTION BY KEEP ALIVE TIMEOUT.
2. FORTE attempts to retry to connect because the request is message
duration.
3. Distributed access exception 'the router does not have available
members'
4. same as 2.
5. same as 3.
Also,on message 3 includes description 'the router does not have
available members'.
Does 'the router' mean central server or not?
If the central server's one is why cannot wake the off line router
partition up ?
If secondary server's one is why Forte attempts to request to disconnect
partition
because Forte disconnect partition himself by keepalive timeout?
OR once I force to be off line partition,Forte failover ability is
cancelled?
(I think it isn't because case of software failover succeeds. this case
belong to
hardware failover problem and relation to TCP/IP low level protocol or
Forte
keepalive protocol )
Have you ever experienced?
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>

Similar Messages

  • Why can't I sign in? I get an "Ajax submit failed: error =403, Forbidden" error message

    Why can I no longer sign in to ePrint Center?
    I get an "Ajax submit failed: error =403, Forbidden" error message -- MAC OS 10.7, D110a printer.

    Here you go.
    http://www.google.com/search?q=Ajax+submit+failed%​3A+error+%3D403%2C+Forbidden&sourceid=ie7&rls=com.​...
    Say thanks by clicking the Kudos Thumbs Up to the right in the post.
    If my post resolved your problem, please mark it as an Accepted Solution ...
    I worked for HP but now I'm retired!

  • "Failed to Send the HTTP Message..." - HTTPSupport problem

    Hello,
    We're having a few difficulties when the HTTPServer in UDS5.0.3 running on Solaris 8. Basically, we have a pair of MS .NET servers using some XML Webservices that we reside on the UDS server.
    The symptoms of the problem are that a lot of "Failed to send the HTTP message..." messages are being seen in the log for the partition that contains instances of the HTTPServer. The reason given is a UsageException on the ExternalConnection - stating that the "Object is not open for I/O so it cannot be read or written" (ExternalConnection::Write at 1). This only occurs when a HTTP Response is to be sent back to the .NET server.
    Unfortunately, this exception appears to be occurring somewhere within the code held in the HTTPSupport library, so we can't easily trace the error. Worse still, we don't actually know what's causing the error.
    Does the error indicate a problem with comms between our UDS HTTPServer and the .NET servers? We've also noticed a large number of socket connections being left in a state of CLOSE_WAIT when this error occurs (which eventually block the port altogether resulting in the HTTPServer instances becoming unresponsive).
    As far as I can tell, the Solaris TCP/IP settings are all at the OS default.
    Many thanks for any assistance,
    Jason Bridgen.

    Hi Gordon,
    The problem was solved, the customer changed his ip adress on the server and it's OK now!
    Thank you !!
    Hilla.

  • Processing data for a remote command failed with the following error message: Error occurred during the Kerberos reponse.

    Hi!
    We have 5 Exchange 2013 servers and when I’m trying to run a script that includes the cmd-let Get-MessageTrackinglog with StartDate = the first of the month and with EndDate = the end of the month I get the following error message after
    a couple of hours. The script is run on the server SERVER01 and goes through the Message Tracking logs of all Exchange servers. I have tried the script on other servers and get the same result.
    Processing data for a remote command failed with the following error message: Error occurred during the Kerberos reponse.
    [Server=SERVER01, TimeStamp = 918/2014 19:32:34]
    For more information, see the about_Remote_Troubleshooting Help topic.
        + CategoryInfo         
    : OperationStopped: (server01.domain.com:String) [], PSRemotingTransportException
        + FullyQualifiedErrorId : JobFailure
        + PSComputerName       
    : server01.domain.com
    I have gone through “about_Remote_Troubleshooting Help topic”, but can’t find anything related to my issue. There is nothing in the Application or the Windows PowerShell log either.
    /Henrik

    Hi Henado 
    Check the time on your Exchange server(s) relative to the DCs and ensure they are in correct sync
    Use another account which is assigned the Organization Management permission and log to to the server run the command in shell and see the results
    Run 
    Add-PSSnapin -Name Microsoft.Exchange.Management.PowerShell.E2010
    Set-Adserversettings -ViewEntireForest $True and then run message tracking command and see the results
    If none of the above helps you may need to remove and re-install the WinRM and see the results
    Good Luck :)
    Remember to mark as helpful if you find my contribution useful or as an answer if it does answer your question.That will encourage me - and others - to take time out to help you Check out my latest blog posts on http://exchangequery.com

  • WLC 5508 - LAP1242: Failed to handle capwap control message from controller

    Hello everyone,
    after finally successfully upgrading my WLCs from 6.0.199.4 to 7.6.100.0 there is another problem showing up...
    If I want to change any configuration regarding the APs on the WLCs (which doesn't work) I get the following error-messages from the APs:
    *spamApTask7: Feb 27 14:34:00.558: 00:3a:9a:d6:5d:30 Test-AP-09-03: *Feb 27 13:34:00.169: %CAPWAP-3-ERRORLOG: Validate Msg: msg type 12 does not supported payload 215
    *spamApTask7: Feb 27 14:34:00.558: 00:3a:9a:d6:5d:30 Test-AP-09-03: *Feb 27 13:34:00.169: %CAPWAP-3-ERRORLOG: Validate Msg: error in Unknown Payload(215) payload (received length = 9, payload type = 215)
    *spamApTask7: Feb 27 14:34:00.558: 00:3a:9a:d6:5d:30 Test-AP-09-03: *Feb 27 13:34:00.170: %CAPWAP-3-ERRORLOG: Failed to validate vendor specific message element type 215 len 9.
    *spamApTask7: Feb 27 14:34:00.558: 00:3a:9a:d6:5d:30 Test-AP-09-03: *Feb 27 13:34:00.170: %CAPWAP-3-ERRORLOG: Failed to decode Configuration update request.
    *spamApTask7: Feb 27 14:34:00.558: 00:3a:9a:d6:5d:30 Test-AP-09-03: *Feb 27 13:34:00.170: %CAPWAP-3-ERRORLOG: CAPWAP SM handler: Failed to process message type 7 state 11.
    *spamApTask7: Feb 27 14:34:00.558: 00:3a:9a:d6:5d:30 Test-AP-09-03: *Feb 27 13:34:00.171: %CAPWAP-3-ERRORLOG: Failed to handle capwap control message from controller
    Find attached some informations regarding the AP and the 5508.
    Any suggestions are, as always, highly appriciated.
    Regards
    Manuel

    Good morning,
    if I need free space at the flash: How much is "enough" to handle config changes?
    Here you can see the filesystem of one of my accesspoints (all are affected):
    AP#dir all-filesystems
    Directory of arch:/
        2  -rwx       91288  Feb 22 2014 18:16:42 +00:00  event.log
        8  drwx         448  Feb 22 2014 18:16:38 +00:00  c1240-k9w8-mx.124-25e.JAO3
        4  drwx           0   Nov 2 2011 23:32:18 +00:00  configs
        5  -rwx         397  Feb 22 2014 18:19:03 +00:00  env_vars
        6  -rwx        6168  Feb 27 2014 18:14:24 +00:00  private-multiple-fs
    No space information available
    Directory of flash:/
        2  -rwx       91288  Feb 22 2014 18:16:42 +00:00  event.log
        8  drwx         448  Feb 22 2014 18:16:38 +00:00  c1240-k9w8-mx.124-25e.JAO3
        4  drwx           0   Nov 2 2011 23:32:18 +00:00  configs
        5  -rwx         397  Feb 22 2014 18:19:03 +00:00  env_vars
        6  -rwx        6168  Feb 27 2014 18:14:24 +00:00  private-multiple-fs
    15740928 bytes total (10614784 bytes free)
    Directory of zflash:/
        2  -rwx       91288  Feb 22 2014 18:16:42 +00:00  event.log
        8  drwx         448  Feb 22 2014 18:16:38 +00:00  c1240-k9w8-mx.124-25e.JAO3
        4  drwx           0   Nov 2 2011 23:32:18 +00:00  configs
        5  -rwx         397  Feb 22 2014 18:19:03 +00:00  env_vars
        6  -rwx        6168  Feb 27 2014 18:14:24 +00:00  private-multiple-fs
    15740928 bytes total (10614784 bytes free)
    Directory of archive:/
    No files in directory
    No space information available
    Directory of system:/
        2  dr-x           0                      memory
        1  -rw-       17631                      running-config
    No space information available
    Directory of nvram:/
       30  -rw-           0                      startup-config
       31  ----           0                      private-config
        1  ----        4100                      lwapp_ap.cfg
        6  ----         528                      lwapp_ap_tlv.cfg
    32768 bytes total (26572 bytes free)
    Regards, Manuel

  • Forte 30N2 : Message duration SO restart after a crash issue

    In our application, the batch processes are based on a 'Controller-Processor' pattern. A controller starts many processor tasks as parallel processes.
    The problem is that our Controller process crashed. However, by that time, many processor processes had already been started by it. These processor tasks were not terminated when the controller crashed.
    Since the controller process is of Message Duration, it 'restarted' automatically after the crash. With this new start, all the processor tasks were started again and therefore were executed twice.
    Now we are looking for a way to terminate the processors automatically if the controller crashes. Is there a way to do this in Forte or do we have to code this explicitly ?
    If not, we can stop start of a processor if it is already executing. But then, how do we get a notification of completion of a previous execution ?
    Any ideas will be appreciated.
    Please let me know if the problem description is not clear.
    Thanks and regards.
    Deepak

    "Since the controller process is of Message Duration, it 'restarted' automatically after the crash" --NO,  the controller was re-started automatically because Forte allways tries to re-execute the method of a SO marked to have Dialog Duration=Message. Apart of that, the SO will be re-started ONLY if the Forte Autostart feature has been enbled in your Forte Environment, otherwise it won't re-start.
    Your problem is more an architectural issue than a Forte one. The children tasks can not notify their parent about a problem (ussually by reporting an exception event) because they were started in a different partition and Forte have partition boundaries when handling the multi-threading for tasks executed in cascade. (Task1-->Task2-->Task3).
    Even if your children tasks can report an exception event to the parent SO, there is still a timming issue: While re-starting the controller a children task can report an exception event, but it wont be listened since the controller is still re-starting.
    Hope this helps..

  • 'OMF export failed due to internal error' message

    Hi,
    Has anyone ever got an 'OMF export failed due to internal error' message when trying to export in OMF format?
    I get that every time I try to export in that format.
    How can I make it work?
    Thanks and best,

    Hello sj holcombe,
    And welcome to Apple Discussions!
    Have you had a chance to check out this Apple support document directly related to this issue? If not, it is a good place to start.
    [iTunes displays a -69 error when syncing iPod|http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1210]
    Hope it helps.
    B-rock

  • The Add-on Creative Cloud Libraries failed to install, General error message

    Hi there,
    My CC icon has an exclamation mark next to it and following message appears when in Apps:
    "The Add-on Creative Cloud Libraries failed to install, General error message"
    Any idea what could be a reason and how to sort it out?
    Thanks,
    Zana

    Nobody can tell you anything without proper system info or other technical details.
    Mylenium

  • Mac RDP Client (v8.0.10 on 10.10.1): HTTPEndPointException: 4, The non-proxy http connection failed to connect with the message: 404 Not Found

    My office is setting up a new gateway server.  I can connect to the old one just fine, but the new one is not allowing me to connect.  I can connect from my Windows VM, but not my Mac Client.  
    This is the log:
    2014-Nov-26 16:09:10] RDP (0): Final rdp configuration used: gatewayhostname:s:gat1.gibbscam.com
    screen mode id:i:0
    use multimon:i:0
    session bpp:i:24
    full address:s:dev-JeremyS2.gibbs.local
    audiomode:i:2
    username:s:Gibbs\JeremyS
    disable wallpaper:i:0
    disable full window drag:i:0
    disable menu anims:i:0
    disable themes:i:0
    alternate shell:s:
    shell working directory:s:
    authentication level:i:2
    connect to console:i:0
    gatewayusagemethod:i:1
    disable cursor setting:i:0
    allow font smoothing:i:1
    allow desktop com"font-family:Helvetica;line-height:normal;" />redirectprinters:i:0
    bookmarktype:i:3
    use redirection server name:i:0
    [2014-Nov-26 16:09:10] RDP (0): --- BEGIN INTERFACE LIST ---
    [2014-Nov-26 16:09:10] RDP (0): lo0 af=18  addr= netmask=
    [2014-Nov-26 16:09:10] RDP (0): lo0 af=30 (AF_INET6)  addr=::1 netmask=ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff
    [2014-Nov-26 16:09:10] RDP (0): lo0 af=2 (AF_INET)  addr=127.0.0.1 netmask=255.0.0.0
    [2014-Nov-26 16:09:10] RDP (0): lo0 af=30 (AF_INET6)  addr=fe80::1%lo0 netmask=ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff::
    [2014-Nov-26 16:09:10] RDP (0): gif0 af=18  addr= netmask=
    [2014-Nov-26 16:09:10] RDP (0): stf0 af=18  addr= netmask=
    [2014-Nov-26 16:09:10] RDP (0): en0 af=18  addr= netmask=
    [2014-Nov-26 16:09:10] RDP (0): en1 af=18  addr= netmask=
    [2014-Nov-26 16:09:10] RDP (0): en1 af=30 (AF_INET6)  addr=fe80::1240:f3ff:fe97:e0b2%en1 netmask=ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff::
    [2014-Nov-26 16:09:10] RDP (0): en1 af=2 (AF_INET)  addr=192.168.0.5 netmask=255.255.255.0
    [2014-Nov-26 16:09:10] RDP (0): en1 af=30 (AF_INET6)  addr=2605:e000:63c2:f800:1240:f3ff:fe97:e0b2 netmask=ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff::
    [2014-Nov-26 16:09:10] RDP (0): en1 af=30 (AF_INET6)  addr=2605:e000:63c2:f800:65fb:7056:64eb:4363 netmask=ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff::
    [2014-Nov-26 16:09:10] RDP (0): fw0 af=18  addr= netmask=
    [2014-Nov-26 16:09:10] RDP (0): en2 af=18  addr= netmask=
    [2014-Nov-26 16:09:10] RDP (0): p2p0 af=18  addr= netmask=
    [2014-Nov-26 16:09:10] RDP (0): bridge0 af=18  addr= netmask=
    [2014-Nov-26 16:09:10] RDP (0): utun0 af=18  addr= netmask=
    [2014-Nov-26 16:09:10] RDP (0): utun0 af=30 (AF_INET6)  addr=fe80::ec38:250a:2a5d:3618%utun0 netmask=ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff::
    [2014-Nov-26 16:09:10] RDP (0): utun0 af=30 (AF_INET6)  addr=fd68:4c46:7658:e98e:ec38:250a:2a5d:3618 netmask=ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff::
    [2014-Nov-26 16:09:10] RDP (0): --- END INTERFACE LIST ---
    [2014-Nov-26 16:09:10] RDP (0): correlation id: d8afdeb7-ce3a-ceff-a6e8-51a5d5b40000
    [2014-Nov-26 16:09:10] RDP (0): Protocol state changed to: ProtocolConnectingNetwork(1)
    [2014-Nov-26 16:09:15] RDP (0): Exception caught: Exception in file '../../librdpclient/asiosocketendpoint.cpp' at line 521
        User Message : Unable to connect to remote PC. Please provide the fully-qualified name or the IP address of the remote
    PC, and then try again.
    [2014-Nov-26 16:09:15] RDP (0): Protocol state changed to: ProtocolDisconnecting(7)
    [2014-Nov-26 16:09:15] RDP (0): Protocol state changed to: ProtocolDisconnected(8)
    [2014-Nov-26 16:09:15] RDP (0): ------ END ACTIVE CONNECTION ------
    [2014-Nov-26 16:09:15] RDP (0): --- BEGIN INTERFACE LIST ---
    [2014-Nov-26 16:09:15] RDP (0): lo0 af=18  addr= netmask=
    [2014-Nov-26 16:09:15] RDP (0): lo0 af=30 (AF_INET6)  addr=::1 netmask=ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff
    [2014-Nov-26 16:09:15] RDP (0): lo0 af=2 (AF_INET)  addr=127.0.0.1 netmask=255.0.0.0
    [2014-Nov-26 16:09:15] RDP (0): lo0 af=30 (AF_INET6)  addr=fe80::1%lo0 netmask=ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff::
    [2014-Nov-26 16:09:15] RDP (0): gif0 af=18  addr= netmask=
    [2014-Nov-26 16:09:15] RDP (0): stf0 af=18  addr= netmask=
    [2014-Nov-26 16:09:15] RDP (0): en0 af=18  addr= netmask=
    [2014-Nov-26 16:09:15] RDP (0): en1 af=18  addr= netmask=
    [2014-Nov-26 16:09:15] RDP (0): en1 af=30 (AF_INET6)  addr=fe80::1240:f3ff:fe97:e0b2%en1 netmask=ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff::
    [2014-Nov-26 16:09:15] RDP (0): en1 af=2 (AF_INET)  addr=192.168.0.5 netmask=255.255.255.0
    [2014-Nov-26 16:09:15] RDP (0): en1 af=30 (AF_INET6)  addr=2605:e000:63c2:f800:1240:f3ff:fe97:e0b2 netmask=ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff::
    [2014-Nov-26 16:09:15] RDP (0): en1 af=30 (AF_INET6)  addr=2605:e000:63c2:f800:65fb:7056:64eb:4363 netmask=ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff::
    [2014-Nov-26 16:09:15] RDP (0): fw0 af=18  addr= netmask=
    [2014-Nov-26 16:09:15] RDP (0): en2 af=18  addr= netmask=
    [2014-Nov-26 16:09:15] RDP (0): p2p0 af=18  addr= netmask=
    [2014-Nov-26 16:09:15] RDP (0): bridge0 af=18  addr= netmask=
    [2014-Nov-26 16:09:15] RDP (0): utun0 af=18  addr= netmask=
    [2014-Nov-26 16:09:15] RDP (0): utun0 af=30 (AF_INET6)  addr=fe80::ec38:250a:2a5d:3618%utun0 netmask=ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff::
    [2014-Nov-26 16:09:15] RDP (0): utun0 af=30 (AF_INET6)  addr=fd68:4c46:7658:e98e:ec38:250a:2a5d:3618 netmask=ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff::
    [2014-Nov-26 16:09:15] RDP (0): --- END INTERFACE LIST ---
    [2014-Nov-26 16:09:15] RDP (0): correlation id: 3d81bcf6-8d0e-fba8-b75e-bd2a247c0000
    [2014-Nov-26 16:09:15] RDP (0): Protocol state changed to: ProtocolConnectingNetwork(1)
    [2014-Nov-26 16:09:15] RDP (0): Resolved 'gat1.gibbscam.com' to '12.167.61.34' using NameResolveMethod_DNS(1)
    [2014-Nov-26 16:09:15] RDP (0): Resolved 'gat1.gibbscam.com' to '12.167.61.34' using NameResolveMethod_DNS(1)
    [2014-Nov-26 16:09:15] RDP (0): Exception caught: Exception in file '../../librdp/private/httpendpoint.cpp' at line 305
        User Message : HTTPEndpointException: 4, The non-proxy http connection failed to connect with the message: 404 Not
    Found
    [2014-Nov-26 16:09:15] RDP (0): Protocol state changed to: ProtocolDisconnecting(7)
    [2014-Nov-26 16:09:15] RDP (0): Protocol state changed to: ProtocolDisconnected(8)
    [2014-Nov-26 16:09:16] RDP (0): ------ END ACTIVE CONNECTION ------
    And here's a log for server that I can connect to:
    [2014-Nov-26 15:52:20] RDP (0): Final rdp configuration used: gatewayhostname:s:gato.gibbscam.com
    screen mode id:i:0
    use multimon:i:1
    session bpp:i:24
    full address:s:dev-JeremyS2.gibbs.local
    audiomode:i:2
    username:s:Gibbs\JeremyS
    disable wallpaper:i:0
    disable full window drag:i:0
    disable menu anims:i:0
    disable themes:i:0
    alternate shell:s:
    shell working directory:s:
    authentication level:i:2
    connect to console:i:0
    gatewayusagemethod:i:1
    disable cursor setting:i:0
    allow font smoothing:i:1
    allow desktop com"font-family:Helvetica;line-height:normal;" />redirectprinters:i:0
    bookmarktype:i:3
    use redirection server name:i:0
    [2014-Nov-26 15:52:20] RDP (0): --- BEGIN INTERFACE LIST ---
    [2014-Nov-26 15:52:20] RDP (0): lo0 af=18  addr= netmask=
    [2014-Nov-26 15:52:20] RDP (0): lo0 af=30 (AF_INET6)  addr=::1 netmask=ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff
    [2014-Nov-26 15:52:20] RDP (0): lo0 af=2 (AF_INET)  addr=127.0.0.1 netmask=255.0.0.0
    [2014-Nov-26 15:52:20] RDP (0): lo0 af=30 (AF_INET6)  addr=fe80::1%lo0 netmask=ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff::
    [2014-Nov-26 15:52:20] RDP (0): gif0 af=18  addr= netmask=
    [2014-Nov-26 15:52:20] RDP (0): stf0 af=18  addr= netmask=
    [2014-Nov-26 15:52:20] RDP (0): en0 af=18  addr= netmask=
    [2014-Nov-26 15:52:20] RDP (0): en1 af=18  addr= netmask=
    [2014-Nov-26 15:52:20] RDP (0): en1 af=30 (AF_INET6)  addr=fe80::1240:f3ff:fe97:e0b2%en1 netmask=ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff::
    [2014-Nov-26 15:52:20] RDP (0): en1 af=30 (AF_INET6)  addr=2605:e000:63c2:f800:1240:f3ff:fe97:e0b2 netmask=ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff::
    [2014-Nov-26 15:52:20] RDP (0): en1 af=30 (AF_INET6)  addr=2605:e000:63c2:f800:d111:af1b:b193:8d4e netmask=ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff::
    [2014-Nov-26 15:52:20] RDP (0): en1 af=2 (AF_INET)  addr=192.168.0.5 netmask=255.255.255.0
    [2014-Nov-26 15:52:20] RDP (0): fw0 af=18  addr= netmask=
    [2014-Nov-26 15:52:20] RDP (0): en2 af=18  addr= netmask=
    [2014-Nov-26 15:52:20] RDP (0): p2p0 af=18  addr= netmask=
    [2014-Nov-26 15:52:20] RDP (0): bridge0 af=18  addr= netmask=
    [2014-Nov-26 15:52:20] RDP (0): utun0 af=18  addr= netmask=
    [2014-Nov-26 15:52:20] RDP (0): utun0 af=30 (AF_INET6)  addr=fe80::ec38:250a:2a5d:3618%utun0 netmask=ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff::
    [2014-Nov-26 15:52:20] RDP (0): utun0 af=30 (AF_INET6)  addr=fd68:4c46:7658:e98e:ec38:250a:2a5d:3618 netmask=ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff::
    [2014-Nov-26 15:52:20] RDP (0): --- END INTERFACE LIST ---
    [2014-Nov-26 15:52:20] RDP (0): correlation id: 3bea4411-4b23-c197-9b52-63f948a10000
    [2014-Nov-26 15:52:20] RDP (0): Protocol state changed to: ProtocolConnectingNetwork(1)
    [2014-Nov-26 15:52:25] RDP (0): Exception caught: Exception in file '../../librdpclient/asiosocketendpoint.cpp' at line 521
        User Message : Unable to connect to remote PC. Please provide the fully-qualified name or the IP address of the remote
    PC, and then try again.
    [2014-Nov-26 15:52:25] RDP (0): Protocol state changed to: ProtocolDisconnecting(7)
    [2014-Nov-26 15:52:25] RDP (0): Protocol state changed to: ProtocolDisconnected(8)
    [2014-Nov-26 15:52:25] RDP (0): ------ END ACTIVE CONNECTION ------
    [2014-Nov-26 15:52:25] RDP (0): --- BEGIN INTERFACE LIST ---
    [2014-Nov-26 15:52:25] RDP (0): lo0 af=18  addr= netmask=
    [2014-Nov-26 15:52:25] RDP (0): lo0 af=30 (AF_INET6)  addr=::1 netmask=ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff
    [2014-Nov-26 15:52:25] RDP (0): lo0 af=2 (AF_INET)  addr=127.0.0.1 netmask=255.0.0.0
    [2014-Nov-26 15:52:25] RDP (0): lo0 af=30 (AF_INET6)  addr=fe80::1%lo0 netmask=ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff::
    [2014-Nov-26 15:52:25] RDP (0): gif0 af=18  addr= netmask=
    [2014-Nov-26 15:52:25] RDP (0): stf0 af=18  addr= netmask=
    [2014-Nov-26 15:52:25] RDP (0): en0 af=18  addr= netmask=
    [2014-Nov-26 15:52:25] RDP (0): en1 af=18  addr= netmask=
    [2014-Nov-26 15:52:25] RDP (0): en1 af=30 (AF_INET6)  addr=fe80::1240:f3ff:fe97:e0b2%en1 netmask=ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff::
    [2014-Nov-26 15:52:25] RDP (0): en1 af=30 (AF_INET6)  addr=2605:e000:63c2:f800:1240:f3ff:fe97:e0b2 netmask=ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff::
    [2014-Nov-26 15:52:25] RDP (0): en1 af=30 (AF_INET6)  addr=2605:e000:63c2:f800:d111:af1b:b193:8d4e netmask=ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff::
    [2014-Nov-26 15:52:25] RDP (0): en1 af=2 (AF_INET)  addr=192.168.0.5 netmask=255.255.255.0
    [2014-Nov-26 15:52:25] RDP (0): fw0 af=18  addr= netmask=
    [2014-Nov-26 15:52:25] RDP (0): en2 af=18  addr= netmask=
    [2014-Nov-26 15:52:25] RDP (0): p2p0 af=18  addr= netmask=
    [2014-Nov-26 15:52:25] RDP (0): bridge0 af=18  addr= netmask=
    [2014-Nov-26 15:52:25] RDP (0): utun0 af=18  addr= netmask=
    [2014-Nov-26 15:52:25] RDP (0): utun0 af=30 (AF_INET6)  addr=fe80::ec38:250a:2a5d:3618%utun0 netmask=ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff::
    [2014-Nov-26 15:52:25] RDP (0): utun0 af=30 (AF_INET6)  addr=fd68:4c46:7658:e98e:ec38:250a:2a5d:3618 netmask=ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff::
    [2014-Nov-26 15:52:25] RDP (0): --- END INTERFACE LIST ---
    [2014-Nov-26 15:52:26] RDP (0): correlation id: 509122b5-d9b1-60f0-a0ac-b75a8dc20000
    [2014-Nov-26 15:52:26] RDP (0): Protocol state changed to: ProtocolConnectingNetwork(1)
    [2014-Nov-26 15:52:26] RDP (0): Resolved 'gato.gibbscam.com' to '12.167.61.35' using NameResolveMethod_DNS(1)
    [2014-Nov-26 15:52:26] RDP (0): Resolved 'gato.gibbscam.com' to '12.167.61.35' using NameResolveMethod_DNS(1)
    [2014-Nov-26 15:52:26] RDP (0): Protocol state changed to: ProtocolNegotiatingCredentials(2)
    [2014-Nov-26 15:52:27] RDP (0): Protocol state changed to: ProtocolConnectingRDP(3)
    [2014-Nov-26 15:52:27] RDP (0): Protocol state changed to: ProtocolInactive(4)
    [2014-Nov-26 15:52:28] RDP (0): Server supports RAIL
    [2014-Nov-26 15:52:28] RDP (0): Protocol state changed to: ProtocolActive(5)
    [2014-Nov-26 15:52:29] RDP (0): Server hides cursor
    [2014-Nov-26 15:52:31] RDP (0): Server shows cursor
    [2014-Nov-26 15:52:35] RDP (0): Protocol state changed to: ProtocolDisconnecting(7)
    [2014-Nov-26 15:52:35] RDP (0): Protocol state changed to: ProtocolDisconnected(8)
    [2014-Nov-26 15:52:35] RDP (0): ------ END ACTIVE CONNECTION ------
    Any suggestions on what I can ask my IT department to change on the server so I can connect would be greatly appreciated. 

    Hi Jeremy,
    Thank you for posting in Windows Server Forum.
    From the error and other description it seems that there is some misconfiguration with setup. You need to provide the FQDN name of the server as might server name is not resolving its name properly and so facing issue. As seems from below details:
    [2014-Nov-26 15:52:20] RDP (0): Final rdp configuration used:gatewayhostname:s:gato.gibbscam.com
    screen mode id:i:0
    use multimon:i:1
    session bpp:i:24
    full address:s:dev-JeremyS2.gibbs.local
    Configuration used and full address name both appears different so please verify configuration accordingly.
    Please check the DNS record, check certificate whether it match FQDN name of the server with certificate name, also try to check to connect with IP address and see what result you can find.
    You can follow below guide to configure RD Gateway and after that verify the result.
    1. Deploying Remote Desktop Gateway RDS 2012
    2. How To Work with RD Gateway in Windows Server 2012
    Hope it helps!
    Thanks.
    Dharmesh Solanki
    TechNet Community Support

  • ZAM collector failed to get WIF path message

    This irritating message constantly appears in C:\Program Files\Novell\ZENworks\Asset Management\bin\colw32.log on many PC's. On some PC's it appears every time the collector service tries to start but on some it only appears infrequently. I need to know how to troubleshoot this message as many of our workstations are not producing an inventory and it's down to this message.
    I have done some tests today on several PC's all logged on as me. Some work, some don't, so it can't be anything to do with policies and rights to the registry. Using ZAM 7.5 IR16 with latest product updates.
    Thanks
    Lenny

    Originally Posted by lennyd
    I should have added, a previous post suggested adding the line
    Diagnostic=1
    into cps.ini which i have done.
    Diag.Exe and DoRes.DLL already exist in the client directory. This has created and populated a file called CClientEvent20081201.log in the client logs directory. However it contains no useful information at all as to why this "Failed to get WIF path" message appears.
    On the particular PC I am using here, there are 2 .WIF files dated 27th November in the InboxCC directory then nothing since so it did work until last week so why it has stopped working now I have no idea.
    Lenny
    I had the same problem. It turns out the Windows firewall was blocking port 7461. Once port 7461 was opened everything started to work.
    Jim

  • Failed to handle capwap control message from controller

    Hello,
    I am struggling in associating a 1242 AP's with WLC's.
    Show version of the AP:
    Cisco IOS Software, C1240 Software (C1240-K9W8-M), Version 12.4(25e)JAM2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
    Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport
    Copyright (c) 1986-2013 by Cisco Systems, Inc.
    Compiled Mon 29-Jul-13 11:32 by prod_rel_team
    ROM: Bootstrap program is C1240 boot loader
    BOOTLDR: C1240 Boot Loader (C1240-BOOT-M) Version 12.3(7)JA1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
    AP0019.56b0.855e uptime is 9 minutes
    System returned to ROM by power-on
    System image file is "flash:/c1240-k9w8-mx.124-25e.JAM2/c1240-k9w8-mx.124-25e.JAM2"
    Show inventory of the AP:
    AME: "AP1240", DESCR: "Cisco Aironet 1240 Series (IEEE 802.11a/g) Access Point"
    PID: AIR-LAP1242AG-E-K9, VID: V01, SN: FCZ10408384
    When trying to attach it to a WLC 5508 running 6.0.199.4, the AP keeps on downloading image and power cycling.
    When trying to attach it to a WLC 5508 running 7.4.110.0, the AP shows the following message :
    Jan 30 08:24:56.372: %CAPWAP-3-ERRORLOG: GOING BACK TO DISCOVER MODE
    *Jan 30 08:24:56.373: %DTLS-5-SEND_ALERT: Send FATAL : Close notify Alert to 10.71.142.7:5246
    *Jan 30 08:24:56.427: %LWAPP-3-CLIENTERRORLOG: LWAPP LED Init: incorrect led state 255
    *Jan 30 08:24:56.445: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to administratively down
    *Jan 30 08:24:56.445: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Dot11Radio1, changed state to administratively down
    *Jan 30 08:24:56.447: %LINK-6-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to up
    *Jan 30 08:24:56.484: %LINK-6-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio1, changed state to up
    *Jan 30 08:24:57.445: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Dot11Radio1, changed state to down
    *Jan 30 08:24:57.473: %LINK-6-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to down
    *Jan 30 08:24:57.478: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to reset
    *Jan 30 08:24:58.466: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Dot11Radio1, changed state to up
    *Jan 30 08:24:58.473: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to down
    *Jan 30 08:24:58.503: %LINK-6-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to up
    *Jan 30 08:24:58.508: %LINK-6-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio1, changed state to down
    *Jan 30 08:24:58.513: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Dot11Radio1, changed state to reset
    *Jan 30 08:24:59.503: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to up
    *Jan 30 08:24:59.508: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Dot11Radio1, changed state to down
    *Jan 30 08:24:59.532: %LINK-6-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio1, changed state to up
    *Jan 30 08:25:00.532: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Dot11Radio1, changed state to up
    *Jan 30 08:25:06.483: %CAPWAP-3-ERRORLOG: Go join a capwap controller
    *Jan 30 08:25:07.000: %CAPWAP-5-DTLSREQSEND: DTLS connection request sent peer_ip: 10.71.142.7 peer_port: 5246
    *Jan 30 08:25:08.565: %CAPWAP-5-DTLSREQSUCC: DTLS connection created sucessfully peer_ip: 10.71.142.7 peer_port: 5246
    *Jan 30 08:25:08.567: %CAPWAP-5-SENDJOIN: sending Join Request to 10.71.142.7
    *Jan 30 08:25:08.598: %CAPWAP-3-ERRORLOG: Invalid event 10 & state 5 combination.
    *Jan 30 08:25:08.599: %CAPWAP-3-ERRORLOG: CAPWAP SM handler: Failed to process message type 10 state 5.
    *Jan 30 08:25:08.599: %CAPWAP-3-ERRORLOG: Failed to handle capwap control message from controller
    *Jan 30 08:25:08.599: %CAPWAP-3-ERRORLOG: Failed to process encrypted capwap packet from 10.71.142.7 Jan 30 08:24:56.372: %CAPWAP-3-ERRORLOG: GOING BACK TO DISCOVER MODE
    *Jan 30 08:24:56.373: %DTLS-5-SEND_ALERT: Send FATAL : Close notify Alert to 10.71.142.7:5246
    *Jan 30 08:24:56.427: %LWAPP-3-CLIENTERRORLOG: LWAPP LED Init: incorrect led state 255
    *Jan 30 08:24:56.445: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to administratively down
    *Jan 30 08:24:56.445: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Dot11Radio1, changed state to administratively down
    *Jan 30 08:24:56.447: %LINK-6-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to up
    *Jan 30 08:24:56.484: %LINK-6-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio1, changed state to up
    *Jan 30 08:24:57.445: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Dot11Radio1, changed state to down
    *Jan 30 08:24:57.473: %LINK-6-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to down
    *Jan 30 08:24:57.478: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to reset
    *Jan 30 08:24:58.466: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Dot11Radio1, changed state to up
    *Jan 30 08:24:58.473: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to down
    *Jan 30 08:24:58.503: %LINK-6-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to up
    *Jan 30 08:24:58.508: %LINK-6-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio1, changed state to down
    *Jan 30 08:24:58.513: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Dot11Radio1, changed state to reset
    *Jan 30 08:24:59.503: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to up
    *Jan 30 08:24:59.508: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Dot11Radio1, changed state to down
    *Jan 30 08:24:59.532: %LINK-6-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio1, changed state to up
    *Jan 30 08:25:00.532: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Dot11Radio1, changed state to up
    *Jan 30 08:25:06.483: %CAPWAP-3-ERRORLOG: Go join a capwap controller
    *Jan 30 08:25:07.000: %CAPWAP-5-DTLSREQSEND: DTLS connection request sent peer_ip: 10.71.142.7 peer_port: 5246
    *Jan 30 08:25:08.565: %CAPWAP-5-DTLSREQSUCC: DTLS connection created sucessfully peer_ip: 10.71.142.7 peer_port: 5246
    *Jan 30 08:25:08.567: %CAPWAP-5-SENDJOIN: sending Join Request to 10.71.142.7
    *Jan 30 08:25:08.598: %CAPWAP-3-ERRORLOG: Invalid event 10 & state 5 combination.
    *Jan 30 08:25:08.599: %CAPWAP-3-ERRORLOG: CAPWAP SM handler: Failed to process message type 10 state 5.
    *Jan 30 08:25:08.599: %CAPWAP-3-ERRORLOG: Failed to handle capwap control message from controller
    *Jan 30 08:25:08.599: %CAPWAP-3-ERRORLOG: Failed to process encrypted capwap packet from 10.71.142.7
    Any idea ?
    Many thanks !

    here is the debug output:
    login as: groupwls
    (Cisco Controller)
    User: groupwls
    Password:************
    Your password does not meet the strong password requirements.For added security,                                                                              set a new password that meets these requirements. To prevent this message from                                                                              showing again, disable the strong password feature.
    (Cisco Controller) >debug pm pki enable
    (Cisco Controller) >debug capwap events enable
    (Cisco Controller) >*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.639: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 DTLS connection not found, creating new connection for 10:64:94:52 (2134) 10:71:142:8 (5246)
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.640: sshpmGetCID: called to evaluate
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.640: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 0, CA cert >bsnOldDefaultCaCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.640: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 1, CA cert >bsnDefaultRootCaCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.640: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 2, CA cert >bsnDefaultCaCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.640: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 3, CA cert >bsnDefaultBuildCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.640: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 4, CA cert >cscoDefaultNewRootCaCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.640: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 5, CA cert >cscoDefaultMfgCaCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.640: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 0, ID cert >bsnOldDefaultIdCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.640: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 1, ID cert >bsnDefaultIdCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.640: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 2, ID cert >cscoDefaultIdCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.640: sshpmGetCertFromCID: called to get cert for CID 155224fa
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.640: sshpmGetCertFromCID: comparing to row 0, certname >bsnOldDefaultCaCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetCertFromCID: comparing to row 1, certname >bsnDefaultRootCaCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetCertFromCID: comparing to row 2, certname >bsnDefaultCaCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetCertFromCID: comparing to row 3, certname >bsnDefaultBuildCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetCertFromCID: comparing to row 4, certname >cscoDefaultNewRootCaCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetCertFromCID: comparing to row 5, certname >cscoDefaultMfgCaCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetCertFromCID: comparing to row 0, certname >bsnOldDefaultIdCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetCertFromCID: comparing to row 1, certname >bsnDefaultIdCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetCertFromCID: comparing to row 2, certname >cscoDefaultIdCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetCID: called to evaluate
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 0, CA cert >bsnOldDefaultCaCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 1, CA cert >bsnDefaultRootCaCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 2, CA cert >bsnDefaultCaCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 3, CA cert >bsnDefaultBuildCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 4, CA cert >cscoDefaultNewRootCaCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 5, CA cert >cscoDefaultMfgCaCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 0, ID cert >bsnOldDefaultIdCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 1, ID cert >bsnDefaultIdCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 2, ID cert >cscoDefaultIdCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetSshPrivateKeyFromCID: called to get key for CID 155224fa
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetSshPrivateKeyFromCID: comparing to row 0, certname >bsnOldDefaultIdCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetSshPrivateKeyFromCID: comparing to row 1, certname >bsnDefaultIdCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetSshPrivateKeyFromCID: comparing to row 2, certname >cscoDefaultIdCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetSshPrivateKeyFromCID: match in row 2
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.883: sshpmGetIssuerHandles: locking ca cert table
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.883: sshpmGetIssuerHandles: calling x509_alloc() for user cert
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.883: sshpmGetIssuerHandles: calling x509_decode()
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.887: sshpmGetIssuerHandles: C=US, ST=California, L=San Jose, O=Cisco Systems, CN=C1240-001956b0855e, [email protected]
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.887: sshpmGetIssuerHandles:   O=Cisco Systems, CN=Cisco Manufacturing CA
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.887: sshpmGetIssuerHandles: Mac Address in subject is 00:19:56:b0:85:5e
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.887: sshpmGetIssuerHandles: Cert Name in subject is C1240-001956b0855e
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.887: sshpmGetIssuerHandles: Cert is issued by Cisco Systems.
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.887: sshpmGetCID: called to evaluate
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.887: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 0, CA cert >bsnOldDefaultCaCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.887: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 1, CA cert >bsnDefaultRootCaCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.887: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 2, CA cert >bsnDefaultCaCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.887: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 3, CA cert >bsnDefaultBuildCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.887: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 4, CA cert >cscoDefaultNewRootCaCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.887: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 5, CA cert >cscoDefaultMfgCaCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.887: sshpmGetCertFromCID: called to get cert for CID 2f6d981f
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.887: sshpmGetCertFromCID: comparing to row 0, certname >bsnOldDefaultCaCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.887: sshpmGetCertFromCID: comparing to row 1, certname >bsnDefaultRootCaCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.887: sshpmGetCertFromCID: comparing to row 2, certname >bsnDefaultCaCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.887: sshpmGetCertFromCID: comparing to row 3, certname >bsnDefaultBuildCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.887: sshpmGetCertFromCID: comparing to row 4, certname >cscoDefaultNewRootCaCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.887: sshpmGetCertFromCID: comparing to row 5, certname >cscoDefaultMfgCaCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.887: ssphmUserCertVerify: calling x509_decode()
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.898: ssphmUserCertVerify: user cert verfied using >cscoDefaultMfgCaCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.898: sshpmGetIssuerHandles: ValidityString (current): 2014/01/30/09:46:38
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.898: sshpmGetIssuerHandles: ValidityString (NotBefore): 2006/10/05/13:05:43
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.898: sshpmGetIssuerHandles: ValidityString (NotAfter): 2016/10/05/13:15:43
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.898: sshpmGetIssuerHandles: getting cisco ID cert handle...
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.898: sshpmGetCID: called to evaluate
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.898: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 0, CA cert >bsnOldDefaultCaCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.898: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 1, CA cert >bsnDefaultRootCaCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.898: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 2, CA cert >bsnDefaultCaCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.898: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 3, CA cert >bsnDefaultBuildCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.898: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 4, CA cert >cscoDefaultNewRootCaCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.898: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 5, CA cert >cscoDefaultMfgCaCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.898: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 0, ID cert >bsnOldDefaultIdCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.898: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 1, ID cert >bsnDefaultIdCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.898: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 2, ID cert >cscoDefaultIdCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.906: sshpmFreePublicKeyHandle: called with 0x2c058e50
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.906: sshpmFreePublicKeyHandle: freeing public key
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:40.169: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Allocated index from main list, Index: 312
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:40.169: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 DTLS keys for Control Plane are plumbed successfully for AP 10.64.94.52. Index 313
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:40.169: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 DTLS Session established server (10.71.142.8:5246), client (10.64.94.52:2134)
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:40.169: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Starting wait join timer for AP: 10.64.94.52:2134
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:40.199: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Join Request from 10.64.94.52:2134
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:40.200: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Deleting AP entry 10.64.94.52:2134 from temporary database.
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:40.201: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Join Version: = 117730816
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:40.201: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Join resp: CAPWAP Maximum Msg element len = 87
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:40.201: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Join Response sent to 10.64.94.52:2134
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:40.201: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 CAPWAP State: Join
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:40.201: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 capwap_ac_platform.c:1225 - Operation State 0 ===> 4
    *apfReceiveTask: Jan 30 09:46:40.201: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Register LWAPP event for AP 00:19:07:c6:39:60 slot 0
    *apfReceiveTask: Jan 30 09:46:40.201: WARP IEs: (12)
    *apfReceiveTask: Jan 30 09:46:40.202:      [0000] dd 0a 00 c0 b9 01 00 00 00 08 01 01
    *apfReceiveTask: Jan 30 09:46:40.202: WARP IEs: (12)
    *apfReceiveTask: Jan 30 09:46:40.202:      [0000] dd 0a 00 c0 b9 01 00 00 00 08 01 01
    *apfReceiveTask: Jan 30 09:46:40.202: WARP IEs: (12)
    *apfReceiveTask: Jan 30 09:46:40.202:      [0000] dd 0a 00 c0 b9 01 00 00 00 08 01 01
    *apfReceiveTask: Jan 30 09:46:40.203: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Register LWAPP event for AP 00:19:07:c6:39:60 slot 1
    *apfReceiveTask: Jan 30 09:46:40.203: WARP IEs: (12)
    *apfReceiveTask: Jan 30 09:46:40.203:      [0000] dd 0a 00 c0 b9 01 00 00 00 08 01 01
    *apfReceiveTask: Jan 30 09:46:40.203: WARP IEs: (12)
    *apfReceiveTask: Jan 30 09:46:40.203:      [0000] dd 0a 00 c0 b9 01 00 00 00 08 01 01
    *apfReceiveTask: Jan 30 09:46:40.203: WARP IEs: (12)
    *apfReceiveTask: Jan 30 09:46:40.203:      [0000] dd 0a 00 c0 b9 01 00 00 00 08 01 01
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:41.021: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Configuration Status from 10.64.94.52:2134
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:41.022: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 CAPWAP State: Configure
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:41.022: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Updating IP info for AP 00:19:07:c6:39:60 -- static 0, 10.64.94.52/255.255.255.0, gtw 10.64.94.254
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:41.022: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Updating IP 10.64.94.52 ===> 10.64.94.52 for AP 00:19:07:c6:39:60
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:41.023: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Setting MTU to 1485
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:44.028: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Configuration Status from 10.64.94.52:2134
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:44.028: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 CAPWAP State: Configure
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:44.028: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Updating IP info for AP 00:19:07:c6:39:60 -- static 0, 10.64.94.52/255.255.255.0, gtw 10.64.94.254
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:44.028: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Updating IP 10.64.94.52 ===> 10.64.94.52 for AP 00:19:07:c6:39:60
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:44.029: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Setting MTU to 1485
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:47.021: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Configuration Status from 10.64.94.52:2134
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:47.021: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 CAPWAP State: Configure
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:47.021: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Updating IP info for AP 00:19:07:c6:39:60 -- static 0, 10.64.94.52/255.255.255.0, gtw 10.64.94.254
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:47.021: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Updating IP 10.64.94.52 ===> 10.64.94.52 for AP 00:19:07:c6:39:60
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:47.022: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Setting MTU to 1485
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:50.021: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Configuration Status from 10.64.94.52:2134
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:50.021: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 CAPWAP State: Configure
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:50.021: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Updating IP info for AP 00:19:07:c6:39:60 -- static 0, 10.64.94.52/255.255.255.0, gtw 10.64.94.254
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:50.021: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Updating IP 10.64.94.52 ===> 10.64.94.52 for AP 00:19:07:c6:39:60
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:50.022: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Setting MTU to 1485
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:53.021: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Configuration Status from 10.64.94.52:2134
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:53.021: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 CAPWAP State: Configure
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:53.021: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Updating IP info for AP 00:19:07:c6:39:60 -- static 0, 10.64.94.52/255.255.255.0, gtw 10.64.94.254
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:53.021: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Updating IP 10.64.94.52 ===> 10.64.94.52 for AP 00:19:07:c6:39:60
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:53.022: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Setting MTU to 1485
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:56.021: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Configuration Status from 10.64.94.52:2134
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:56.021: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 CAPWAP State: Configure
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:56.021: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Updating IP info for AP 00:19:07:c6:39:60 -- static 0, 10.64.94.52/255.255.255.0, gtw 10.64.94.254
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:56.021: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Updating IP 10.64.94.52 ===> 10.64.94.52 for AP 00:19:07:c6:39:60
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:56.022: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Setting MTU to 1485
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:59.019: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 DTLS keys for Control Plane deleted successfully for AP 10.64.94.52
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:59.026: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 DTLS connection closed event receivedserver (10:71:142:8/5246) client (10:64:94:52/2134)
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:59.026: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Entry exists for AP (10:64:94:52/2134)
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:59.026: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 apfSpamProcessStateChangeInSpamContext: Deregister LWAPP event for AP 00:19:07:c6:39:60 slot 0
    *apfReceiveTask: Jan 30 09:46:59.026: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Deregister LWAPP event for AP 00:19:07:c6:39:60 slot 0
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:59.027: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 apfSpamProcessStateChangeInSpamContext: Deregister LWAPP event for AP 00:19:07:c6:39:60 slot 1
    *apfReceiveTask: Jan 30 09:46:59.027: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Deregister LWAPP event for AP 00:19:07:c6:39:60 slot 1
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:59.028: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 No AP entry exist in temporary database for 10.64.94.52:2134
    *spamApTask0: Jan 30 09:46:59.127: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Received LWAPP DISCOVERY REQUEST to 44:2b:03:b4:39:cf on port '13'
    *spamApTask3: Jan 30 09:46:59.128: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Discovery Request from 10.64.94.52:2135
    *spamApTask3: Jan 30 09:46:59.128: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Join Priority Processing status = 0, Incoming Ap's Priority 1, MaxLrads = 50, joined Aps =0
    *spamApTask3: Jan 30 09:46:59.128: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Discovery Response sent to 10.64.94.52:2135
    *spamApTask3: Jan 30 09:46:59.129: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Discovery Response sent to 10.64.94.52:2135
    *spamApTask0: Jan 30 09:46:59.129: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Discarding discovery request in LWAPP from AP supporting CAPWAP
    *spamApTask0: Jan 30 09:47:28.995: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Received LWAPP DISCOVERY REQUEST to 44:2b:03:b4:39:cf on port '13'
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:47:28.996: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Discovery Request from 10.64.94.52:2134
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:47:28.996: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Join Priority Processing status = 0, Incoming Ap's Priority 1, MaxLrads = 50, joined Aps =0
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:47:28.996: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Discovery Response sent to 10.64.94.52:2134
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:47:28.996: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Discovery Response sent to 10.64.94.52:2134
    *spamApTask0: Jan 30 09:47:28.996: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Discarding discovery request in LWAPP from AP supporting CAPWAP
    *spamApTask0: Jan 30 09:47:58.856: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Received LWAPP DISCOVERY REQUEST to 44:2b:03:b4:39:cf on port '13'
    *spamApTask3: Jan 30 09:47:58.857: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Discovery Request from 10.64.94.52:2135
    *spamApTask3: Jan 30 09:47:58.857: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Join Priority Processing status = 0, Incoming Ap's Priority 1, MaxLrads = 50, joined Aps =0
    *spamApTask3: Jan 30 09:47:58.857: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Discovery Response sent to 10.64.94.52:2135
    *spamApTask3: Jan 30 09:47:58.857: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Discovery Response sent to 10.64.94.52:2135
    *spamApTask0: Jan 30 09:47:58.857: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Discarding discovery request in LWAPP from AP supporting CAPWAP
    *sshpmLscTask: Jan 30 09:48:10.688: sshpmLscTask: LSC Task received a message 4

  • RegTask: Failed to send registration request message. Error: 0x80040231

    Hi,
    i am getting the below error ClientIDManager.log
    RegTask: Failed to send registration request message. Error: 0x80040231
    RegTask: Failed to send registration request. Error: 0x80040231
    Error initializing client registration (0x80040222).
    Please let me know how can i solve the error.
    Regards,
    Boopathi

    Checked this ?
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/systemcenter/en-US/235b795b-442d-4d72-aff0-642d3714ee48/sccm-2007-sp2-mixed-mode-failed-to-send-reqistration-request-message-080040231
    Arnav Sharma | Facebook |
    Twitter Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members
    reading the thread.

  • Failed to send the mail message error code: -49

    Hi,
    When sending mail outside the company (outside the domain), getting this error: Failed to send the mail message error code: -49
    When sending mail internally (within the domain) successfully submitted.
    I was looking for notes relating to the subject but could not find anything that helped me
    I would appreciate your help,
    Hilla

    Hi Gordon,
    The problem was solved, the customer changed his ip adress on the server and it's OK now!
    Thank you !!
    Hilla.

  • Connecting to remote server failed with the following error message : Access is denied. For more information, see the about_Remote_Troubleshooting Help topic. It was running the command 'Discover-ExchangeServer -UseWIA $true -SuppressError $true -CurrentV

    I installed Exchange Server 2010 inside my VMWare Windows Server 2008 Ent R2. And After successful installation  when I try to open my Exchange Server Console, I am getting the following error message. I am very new to Exchange server please help me
    to solve this problem.
    Initialization Failed
    The following error occurred while searching for the on-premises Exchange server:
    [win-.local] Connecting to remote server failed with the following error message : Access is denied. For more information, see the about_Remote_Troubleshooting Help topic. It was running the command 'Discover-ExchangeServer -UseWIA $true -SuppressError
    $true -CurrentVersion 'Version 14.1 (Build 218.15)''.
    Thanks Vivek
    SharePoint Foundation 2010 Book
    http://www.redpipit.com

    Hi,
    Please have a look at the article below:
    Troubleshooting Exchange 2010 Management Tools startup issues
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2010/02/04/3409289.aspx
    Resolving WinRM errors and Exchange 2010 Management tools startup failures
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2010/12/07/3411644.aspx
    Besides, please run the cmdlet below:
     set-user alias -remotepowershellenabled$true
    Xiu Zhang
    TechNet Community Support

  • My Time Machine backup keeps failing.  I get a message the "Volume has the wrong case sensitivity for a backup".  Please advise.

    My Time Machine backup keeps failing.  I get a message the "Volume has the wrong case sensitivity for a backup".  Please advise.
    Thanks, Howard

    You can change the case sensitivity of the sparsebundle.. but I really doubt the error is real.
    See A8 here.
    http://pondini.org/TM/Troubleshooting.html
    The sparsebundle should have case sensitivity turned on.
    I cannot even fathom how it could have changed.
    Let me recommend before you start fooling around with the sparsebundle.
    Do a full network start.
    Power everything off.. start up modem.. wait 2min.. power up the TC.. wait 2min.. power up any other network gear like switches.. wait..
    Now power up the computer and try it.
    If the error is the same.. I would do a factory reset of the TC.. give it all short names, no spaces and pure alphanumeric. Then reset TM .. see A4 in the same reference as above.. and do a verify of the backups.. A5 above and try the backup again..
    No luck..
    Then erase the TC and start over.. it is sometimes necessary as TM does get itself in a knot.

Maybe you are looking for