Failover, load balancing, band sharing - problem

I would like to accomplish the following task:
SW-A and SW-B two separate subnets, without any contact with each other.
1. Router A would perform as a gateway for computers connected to SW-A
2. Router B would perform as a gateway for computers connected to SW-B
3. Router A transfer all of your unused band "gives" to Router B (office to run periodically and sometimes weeks or even months when it is not used, we do not want to band a wasted)
4. Router A has a band of 8/8
5. Router B has a band of 8/8 + unused band of router A
6. In case of failure of Router A router B takes over as the gateway to SW-A giving him 50% of the total band
7. In case of failure of Router B router A takes over as the gateway to SW-B giving him 75% of the total band
Is this possible? problem is point 3. and points. 5, whether Cisco can manage and share transfer unused band ? on which devices can be done? (routers, firewalls ?)
sorry for my english
Thanks
dk

Disclaimer
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
Liability Disclaimer
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Posting
It might be either the partners you've spoken to are incompetent to do what you're requesting, or they and/or myself don't fully understand what you're asking.  I will say I've done load sharing (outbound) using OER/PfR with HSRP/GLBP.  Works very nice, and although there's some learning required, not really too difficult.  PfR supports ingress sharing too, but ingress sharing can be very, very difficult to deal with.  Much depends on what's on the "outside".
As to sizing a router, number of users often means little.  What's important is how much (and sometimes kind of) traffic will be passing through the router.  I've attached a Cisco document that will explain much about ISR performance for different traffic loads and kinds.

Similar Messages

  • Urgent: Load balance the shared services server

    Hello Experts,
    One of my customer would like to know that is there a way to load balance the shared services server i.e., Register one essbase server with more than one Shared services server, so that if one shared services fails the other can authenticate the logins for the essbase server.
    Also, referred the following weblink for 11x, Table 3. EPM System High Availability and Load Balancing Matrix
    http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E12825_01/epm.111/epm_high_avail_11111/frameset.htm?ch01s04.html
    Do we have any docs for version 9x?
    Environment:
    Essbase 9.3.1.3.00
    OS : IBM AIX on POWER Systems (64-bit) 5.3
    Any suggestions would be of great help. Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Sonal

    I would not attempt any changes until 9.3.1 service fix #16 is released.
    Oracle is back-porting clusterware support to with service fix # 16.
    HSS 9.3.1sf 16 "active passive failover cluster with Oracle Clusterware 11g, for hss web app and openldap"
    Based on the Oracle escalated support resources I have been in touch with solutions are not supported. Please realize this is not load-balancing and is fail-over support only.
    To my knowledge there is not a "active-active" 9.3.1 Shared Services that is supported by Oracle.
    You can read more about an active-passive fail-over at: http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/bi/pdf/epm-hss-high-avail-windows-whitepaper.pdf
    They are supposed to release a 9.3.1 white paper once service fix #16 is fully released and has been client tested.
    Regards,
    John

  • Hot to do Failover/Load balance on CORBA C++ Client

    I have a corba C++ client using Bea/Tuxedo 8.0 ORB talking to stateless session beans
    on Weblogic Server 6.1/sp2.
    Question:
    If the wls server(s) is a cluster, how do I use this feature in my C++ client to
    provide the failover/load balance?
    Will the rmic generate idl which is cluster-aware if the EJBs are clustered?
    Any help is appreciated.
    Thanks,
    steve

    "steve" <[email protected]> writes:
    I have a corba C++ client using Bea/Tuxedo 8.0 ORB talking to stateless session beans
    on Weblogic Server 6.1/sp2.
    Question:
    If the wls server(s) is a cluster, how do I use this feature in my C++ client to
    provide the failover/load balance?Currently, although the information is available to the client it does
    not use it. This will probably change in a future release of Tuxedo,
    but you should talk to your sales rep for details.
    For now you can get some degree of failover by catching the
    COMM_FAILURE exception and re-looking up CosNaming and your bean.
    Will the rmic generate idl which is cluster-aware if the EJBs are clustered?The information is provided dynamically at runtime, so its independent
    of the IDL.
    andy

  • IP failover, load balancing and notification...

    Pretend I have the following setup/hardware:
    Two intel xserves running 10.4. One is for http traffic the other https. The http server contains a static html website while the other server has a large dynamic database driven website and all of its pages require ssl encryption. I'll refer to the first as server 1 and server 2 for the other.
    Now I want to implement a solution for providing high availability and performance.
    If I wanted IP failover I would need two additional servers, one for the first webserver and the second for the other. Likewise if I wanted to address load balancing I would also need two additional servers, one for server 1 the other for server 2. Now my questions:
    1) It seems implementing load balancing as described on page 32 of Apples High Availability pdf that this would also provide high availability like IP failover does. If two additional servers were purchased to provide high availability via a load balancing strategy would there be any need to implement IP failover? Does load balancing provide the same benefits as IP failover when talking about high availability? When if ever would one need to implement both strategies?
    2) Can you somehow provide IP failover with only one server as the backup using the setup above (a third server to provide IP failover for both servers 1 and 2)? Assume the third server has all the data of both server 1 and server 2.
    3) Is it possible to have Server Admin or Raid admin notify you of a problem via calling your cell phone or sending you a text message as opposed to only email, maybe via a third party solution? I think (not 100% sure) APC offers this when the power left in their batteries reaches a certain level.
    Thanks.
    G5 xserve   Mac OS X (10.4.8)  

    1) There's generally no need to implement IP Failover at the server level if you're already using a separate load balancing solution. The load balancer should be able to take care of dealing with a failed server.
    2) Good question - it's not clear whether IPFailover will failover for one machine or more than one.
    3) Most cellphone providers offer an email-to-SMS gateway, allowing you to send an email to an email address that's forwarded to your phone as a text message. Check your cellphone provider for details on what that email address might be (e.g. Cingular uses <phonenumber>@cingularme.com, Verizon uses <phonenumber>@msg.myvzw.com, etc.

  • Load balancing remote shared object?

    Has anyone had experience keeping the Remote Shared Object in
    sync between multiple FMS servers for load balancing purposes? I'm
    thinking in terms of being able to push an SO change to one and
    have the others stay in sync.

    I made it use localhost as the path to the .swf so you might
    want to change the net connection uri property to the application
    directory if you are testing on a webhosts domain.
    [/code]
    var my_nc:NetConnection = new NetConnection();
    my_nc.connect("rtmp:/myDomain/mySwf");
    my_so = SharedObject.getRemote("testSo", my_nc.uri, true);
    my_so.connect(my_nc);
    my_so.data.aString = "a testing string";
    /// making sure it's saved.
    //I can see it fine now
    trace(my_so.data.aString);
    var my_nc:NetConnection = new NetConnection();
    my_nc.connect("rtmp:/myDomain/mySWF");
    my_so = SharedObject.getRemote("testSo", my_nc.uri, true);
    my_so.connect(my_nc);
    trace(my_so.data.astring);
    [/code]

  • Load balancing and RFC problem

    Hi!
    I have a problem regarding load balancing and RFC's. We use the follow function in librfc32.dll (from VB6) for RFC calls: RfcOpenExt It's working fine no problem, but from now on we will have to use the this funcion due to load balancing: RfcOpenExtV3
    The only difference between the two functions is the parameters. RfcOpenExtV3 has 5 additional parameters:
    intLoadBalance1, strLbHost1, strLbSysName1, strLbGroup1, intSapGui1
    I asked our tech guys for the details so that I can set up the parameters (double check everything) and the RfcOpenExtV3 doesn't working. Return value is zero.
    Have somebody faced with this issue before?
    Thanks in advance!

    Hi,
    1. Probably this  link may help.
    [http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/22/042f18488911d189490000e829fbbd/content.htm]
    Especially see the function parameters on this page,
    which are the bottom.
    regards,
    amit m.

  • ML1000 RPR load balancing and multicast problem

    Hello,
    We have SDH network consisting in a STM16 ring with 7 ONS15454 MSPP nodes, sw version 9.0.1. In each node we have a ML1000-2 card connected in a RPR configuration through VC4-8C(8x155Mbs) circuits.
    My questions:
    Q1 We had expected the ring to balance itself but instead 90% of the traffic is going anti-clockwise which is the direction of the POS-0.
    Q2 We are not able to transmit Multicast packets and we sometimes have problems with udp losses. Could this be due to a bad configuration of the ML-1000? Should we investigate higher in the core switches(6500’s)?
    Thanks

    Manuel,
    I just published a document on load balancing on the ML card.  (ML Load Balancing after 5.doc).
    Check the document section in the Optical Forum.
    Also check the on-line configuration guide.
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/optical/15000r9_0/ethernet/454/guide/45490a_mlcardovw.html
    As for question #2.  o may find some answers on multicast in the load balancing document or configuration guide.  If not, I suggest opening a TAC case so they can verify your ML configuration.
    Hope this Helps,
    Steve Noyes
    CSE Cisco TAC

  • Is there any failover/load balancing among kjs engines on a single ias server?

    I guess the question pretty much says it all. To be more explicit, if a kjs engine crashes, would all requests in progress be re-attempted on a different kjs?
    Also, at what level is the user session information stored (kjs, kxs)?
    Thanks a lot

    hi Mihai,
    Yes, we do have a load balancing mechanism between the KJSs in a single instance of the appserver. Requests from the kxs engine will be load balanced in a round robin fashion to the KJS engines.
    Note that if a KJS engine crashes, then the requests will be directed to the other KJS engines, but if the KJS engine is 'hanging', then this redirection does not happen.
    If the sessions are distributed, then they are stored in the KXS, but if they are lite, then they are stored in the KJS engine.
    Hope that helps,
    Vasanth

  • Cisco RV016 Failover & Load Balance Multi WAN Issue

    Hi,
    I think the RV016 is the correct device to buy for our small building but I am a little confused from the manual whether my intended configuration is possible, so if you could confirm if this is possible I would appreciate it.
    We have a leased line as our primary connection (lets call it WAN1). If this connection is available I don't want to load balance on any other WAN.
    We have 2 identical netgear 4G devices (call them WAN 2 and WAN 3). If the leased line is unavailable, I would like to then load balance these two WAN connections.
    I then have a final connection, WAN4 as a slow adsl backup line. I do not know at present whether I want to load balance this in a WAN1 failure or just have it as a backup to WAN2 and WAN3 (WAN2 and WAN3 have a 20gb data limit each on their monthly contract allowance, if the leased line is down for more than a couple of days, which has unfortunately happened before, then we will hit this limit and then need to face either extremely expensive data charges or just use the ADSL alone)
    Anyway, bottom line is under normal conditions I don't want to load balance. I only want to load balance WAN2 and WAN3 in the case of WAN1 failure.
    Does anyone know if this is possible? If not, is there any other similar device which would suit?
    Thank you
    Ben

    Hi Bencarroll01,
    With RV016 you can achieve what you need.
    RV016 support up to 7 WAN connection, and there is two working mode 
    Intelligent Balancer (Auto Mode): Select this option to balance traffic between all interfaces to increase the available bandwidth. The router balances the traffic between the interfaces in a weighted round robin fashion.
    IP Group (By Users): Select this option to group traffic on each WAN interface by priority levels or classes of service (CoS). With this feature, you can ensure bandwidth and higher priority for the specified services and users. All traffic that is not added to the IP Group uses Intelligent Balancer mode. To specify the services and users, click the Edit icon for the WAN interface and then add protocol binding entries for each service, IP address, or range of IP addresses.
    For our case we need to have RV016 configured with IP Group(By User) so in this case we can configure Protocol binding which we can specify and force all the traffic coming from any IP address from the local network going outside through WAN1. and other WAN connection they always UP but not traffic passing through them
    now if WAN1 is Down, immediately the Rule for redirecting traffic to WAN 1 will be Disabled and all the traffic will be passing through the rest of the WAN connection
    After that if the WAN1 is UP again the rule of protocol binding will be active again and again all the traffic will be through WAN 1
    Please let me know if you have any others questions
    Please rate this post or marked as answered to help other Cisco customers  
    Greetings
    Mehdi

  • SSL Load Balancing (Java applets problem)

    Hi,
    I have implemented loadbalancing of two webservers using CSS 11503.
    Servers are containing SSL pages which need to be loadbalanced.
    I have tried configuring the content rule for ssl using
    port 443
    application ssl
    advanced-balance ssl
    commands.The site opens properly using the VIP address (checked the SSL certificate issued by one of the servers. ) and I am able to see all the TABS on the same.The real problem starts when I am trying to upload a file to the server using the VIP address.
    The moment I try to upload a file the session shifts to the second server and prompts for new certificate issued by the second server.
    One more thing which I would like to mention here is that while uploading the file, JAVA is used.
    i.e.the files are being uploaded using JAVA applets.
    If anybody has encountered this kind of problem kindly suggest on the same.
    Would appreciate if you send the solution on [email protected]
    Any configs needed plz contact me on the above e-mail ID.
    Thanks,
    Pankaj P.

    HI Pankaj,
    depending on your Java applett it might be possible that the applett opens a new connection. therefore depending on your total configuration it might be possible taht another server is used.Even worse if you do SSL-offloading the applett might tell the user to do http instead of https. I suggest that you check with a sniffertrace what is happening:
    1) is there a new connection setup while the applett runs
    2) is it again http or https and if https is it a new https session which will be again balanced not depending on the original https session.
    Hope that helps
    regards,
    Joerg

  • JMS Failover & Load balancing.

    Hi,
    I have 4 Managed servers A,B,C,D on 4 physical boxes. We have one JMs server on Box D, All other Managed server uses this only JMS which is on D, if this goes down we loose all messages. I want to have JMS failover in my environment. I suggested to have 4 JMS servers and 4 File stores for each Managed server? my question is that Is weblogic that intellegent that if a client connects to box B JMS server and if the servers goes down, the message will be send top another JMS server?

    ravi tiwari wrote:
    Hi,
    I have 4 Managed servers A,B,C,D on 4 physical boxes. We have one JMs server on Box D, All other Managed server uses this only JMS which is on D, if this goes down we loose all messages. I want to have JMS failover in my environment. I suggested to have 4 JMS servers and 4 File stores for each Managed server? my question is that Is weblogic that intellegent that if a client connects to box B JMS server and if the servers goes down, the message will be send top another JMS server?You don't mention if you're running in a clustered environment or what
    version of WLS you're using, so I've assumed a cluster and WLS 8.1
    For resiliency, you should really have 4 JMS servers, one on each
    managed server. Then each JMS server has it's own filestore on the
    physical managed server machine.
    So, you have JMSA, JMSB, JMSC, JMSD with FileStoreA, FileStoreB,
    FileStoreC & FileStoreD.
    You should also look at using JMS distributed destinations as described
    in the documentation.
    In your current environment, if server D goes down, you not only lose
    your messages, your application would lose access to your JMS queues?
    If you use distributed destinations, and have 4 JMS servers, your JMS
    queues will still be available if a single server goes down.
    If a server does go down however, you have to follow the JMS migration
    procedures to migrate the JMS service from the failed server to a
    running one.
    There are conditions to this process, which are best found out from the
    migration documentation to be honest, rather than describe it here.
    We use this setup, and it works fine for us. We've never had to use JMS
    migration, as so far we haven't had anything serious to cause us to need
    to migrate. Our servers also boot from a SAN which makes our resilience
    processes simpler.
    Hope that helps,
    Pete

  • How to achive failover & load balancing

    Hi ,
    I have installed WebLogic server 5.1,
    I followed one documentation for clustering.
    I don't know how to set up cluster configuration WebLogic.property file.
    If you have any sample property please
    send it to me,
    Thanks

    I think the best way is to follow the documentation.
    Attached is my startup script.
    Cheers - Wei
    Sanjay <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:399959ba$[email protected]..
    Hi ,
    I have installed WebLogic server 5.1,
    I followed one documentation for clustering.
    I don't know how to set up cluster configuration WebLogic.property file.
    If you have any sample property please
    send it to me,
    Thanks[swc1.cmd]

  • Load Balance Problem in Oracle RAC 10.2.0.4 (two nodes with CRS)

    Hi all,
    I have an Oracle RAC 10.2.0.4 with two nodes and I'm having problems with sessions load balance.
    The problem is that all connections are going to the node which is enabled as 'master' in RAC, the node who has located .db resource in CRS.
    If .db resource is located in node1 all connections are made in node1. In the same way, all connections are made in node2 when .db resource from CRS stack is located in node2.
    The connections are made by a pool in Tomcat 6 using RAC service for made the connections.
    Any idea?
    Thanks in advance.
    Here is an example of my net configuration:
    listener.ora in node1:
    LISTENER_RAC_NODE1 =
    (DESCRIPTION_LIST =
    (DESCRIPTION =
    (ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = node1_vip)(PORT = 1525)(IP = FIRST))
    (ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = node1)(PORT = 1525)(IP = FIRST))
    tnsnames in node1:
    LISTENERS_RAC =
    (ADDRESS_LIST =
    (ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = node1_vip)(PORT = 1525))
    (ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = node2_vip)(PORT = 1525))
    NODE1 =
    (DESCRIPTION =
    (ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = node1_vip)(PORT = 1525))
    (ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = node1)(PORT = 1525))
    (CONNECT_DATA =
    (SERVER = DEDICATED)
    (SERVICE_NAME = rac)
    (INSTANCE_NAME = rac1)
    RAC =
    (DESCRIPTION =
    (ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = node1_vip)(PORT = 1525))
    (ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = node2_vip)(PORT = 1525))
    (LOAD_BALANCE = yes)
    (CONNECT_DATA =
    (SERVER = DEDICATED)
    (SERVICE_NAME = rac)
    ********************************************************

    It is my fault.
    It was the connection service. I had one one with preferred option and one without it. Now is working well.

  • Connection string in listener log file for loading balance/failover

    Hi Experts,
    I have 4 node RAC for oracle 10g2 in rad hate 5.0
    We creaed service dbsale ( sale1,2 as pr imary and sale3/4 as available) with loading balance/failover.
    The remote user created a local TNS as
    localmarket =
    (DESCRIPTION =
    (ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = 155.206.xxx.xx)(PORT = 1521))
    (LOAD_BALANCE = OFF)
    (CONNECT_DATA = (SERVICE_NAME = dbsale))
    From server side, I saw that user send two request connection string. one fail and another is OK.
    It seems that fail connecting come from failover/loading balance from dbsale3?
    Why do we get two connection string in listener log file?
    Which difference is between two connection string?
    Where does system change these connection string?
    Thanks for your explaining.
    Jim
    ==============listener.log message
    [oracle@sale log]$ cat listener_sale.log|grep pmason
    15-SEP-2009 13:52:24 * (CONNECT_DATA=(SERVICE_NAME=dbsale)(CID=(PROGRAM=oracle)(HOST=rock)(USER=test ))) * (ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=tcp)(HOST=161.55.xxx.xx)(PORT=54326)) * establish * dbsale * 0
    15-SEP-2009 13:52:25 * (CONNECT_DATA=(SERVICE_NAME=dbsale)(CID=(PROGRAM=oracle)(HOST=rock)(USER=test ))(SERVER=dedicated)(INSTANCE_NAME=sale3)) * (ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=tcp)(HOST=161.55.xxx.xx)(PORT=54327)) * establish * dbsale * 12520
    15-SEP-2009 13:52:30 * (CONNECT_DATA=(SERVICE_NAME=dbsale)(CID=(PROGRAM=oracle)(HOST=rock)(USER=test ))) * (ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=tcp)(HOST=161.55.xxx.xx)(PORT=54329)) * establish * dbsale* 0
    15-SEP-2009 13:52:47 * (CONNECT_DATA=(SERVICE_NAME=dbsale)(CID=(PROGRAM=oracle)(HOST=rock)(USER=test ))) * (ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=tcp)(HOST=161.55.xxx.xx)(PORT=54332)) * establish * dbsale * 0
    15-SEP-2009 13:52:47 * (CONNECT_DATA=(SERVICE_NAME=dbsale)(CID=(PROGRAM=oracle)(HOST=rock)(USER=test ))(SERVER=dedicated)(INSTANCE_NAME=sale3)) * (ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=tcp)(HOST=161.55.xxx.xx)(PORT=54333)) * establish dbsale 12520
    15-SEP-2009 13:52:49 * (CONNECT_DATA=(SERVICE_NAME=dbsale)(CID=(PROGRAM=oracle)(HOST=rock)(USER=test ))) * (ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=tcp)(HOST=161.55.xxx.xx)(PORT=54334)) * establish * dbsale * 0
    Edited by: user589812 on Sep 16, 2009 7:21 AM

    Hi Jim,
    I think the best way on this case is create one service with one instance as primary and another 3 as available.
    Or use the connect string with two vip addresses, cause the service has two instances and the tnsnames.ora entry has only one.
    Cheers,
    Rodrigo Mufalani
    http://mufalani.blogspot.com

  • How to configure R/3 System with Load Balancing?

    Hello,
    I've created a Web DynPro Application and I would like to case an iView on  it. According to SAP tutorials I first need to configure an R/3 System with Load Balancing.
    My problem is how to configure the "WAS Host Name".
    According to the tutorial:
    WAS Host Name = <host>.<domain>:port (this corresponds to the Web Dynpro server location and the port on which it is running eg. PXYZ.wdf.sap.corp:50000.)
    I am using NW 04 and my portal is running on this address:
    http://ep6sp9test:50000/irj/portal
    When I set the WAS Host Name to ep6sp9test:50000 the Test connection fails (I have privildges and created an alias and User mapping). What should I put at this field then?

    Hi
    I think you have to specify the HTTP port og the WAS running the R/3 system. The 50000 port is the HTTP port of your portal - not the R/3 system.  You can see the HTTP port of the R/3 system using transactioncode SMICM - services in the R/3 system.
    BR
    Tom

Maybe you are looking for

  • [SOLVED] Unable to boot in UEFI System

    For several days I have been trying to get Arch to boot on my desktop by following the Beginners' guide and refering to other Arch wiki articles as well as Arch Forum posts for any problems that I had. I have tried a few bootloaders such as GRUB, gum

  • Unable to find imported files in music, even though they show up in playlists

    I recently tried to import about 400 mp3s into iTunes so I can load them on my iPod. It went through the process of importing the files, and I didn't see any of the new songs in iTunes. I tried rebooting my computer, and they were still missing, howe

  • Lync 2013 problem with interaction in Hyper-V

    Hello, during the conference in Lync 2013 does not work the guest interaction service, which has been referred to the control (display the desktop). The guest can move the cursor, but can't click or write in Hyper-V virtual machine. In a virtual mach

  • Safari is basically useless for me

    Safari (ver 5.0.6) is just about useless to me on my main computer. Sure, it’s an older “Quicksilver” Power  Mac G4 @ 1.47 GHz w/ 1 GB RAM but I don’t use it for much more than managing my iTunes & iPhoto Libraries, email & web surfing – which I can’

  • Manual Payment (J04102) - Missing Amounts in The Payment Lines (Fold)

    Dear Fellows; I need your helps on this annoying issue. We use JDE Wolrd in AS400 database environment. We have a problem in J04102 (Enter Manual Payments) when matching the payment amount with the pay items (invoices). In the screen, we cannot view