Fair Share B with Interchangeability

Hello All,
       Is to possible to use the Fair Share rule B with Interchangeability in SNP Deployment (SCM 7.0)???
Thanks,
Siva.

Hi Sivaprakash,
A short answer to your question is NO.
The deployment heuristic and the deployment optimizer take into account SNP product substitution orders that were created during heuristic-based or optimization-based planning in Supply Network Planning (SNP).
The fair share rule A (Proportional Distribution Based on Demands) or one of the push rules, Pull, Pull/Push, or Push by Demands as the distribution rules for the deployment heuristic in the product master data is respected . The other distribution rules are not supported.
Therefore  the Fair Share Rule B: Proportional Distribution Based on Target Stock  will NOT be respected with product substitution.
Please find additonal document help on following URL:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_scm70/helpdata/en/1c/4d7a375f0dbc7fe10000009b38f8cf/frameset.htm
Please also refer to OSS note 1405636  SCM 7.0 Implementation recommendations SNPCTMVMI.
I hope this gives you insight.
Please confirm.
Regards
Datta

Similar Messages

  • Fair share priority

    Hi there,
    I have a situation where several WorkManagers have same fair share and one common max thread constraint but one component may have irregular high workload. My task is to provide some minimum resources for each component without changing their fair share during periods of normal request count.
    I was trying to search for scheduler’s algorithm and found out that it is a priority fair queue. It uses parameter ‘virtual time’ for each WorkManager that can be observed in RequestClassRuntimeMBean.
    Is someone familiar with internal WorkManager structure? Is virtual time internal priority of thread queue and can it be modified in runtime to change WorkManager behavior?
    Best wishes,
    Eugene

    Hi,
    I assume you are using safety stock also, so all the requiremnts will have two parts Forecast and Safety Stock required.
    For example the requirement propagated to a source location S1 from two destination location is D1 = 100 & D2 = 130.
    Now out of this for D1 50 is forecast and 50 is safety stock req and for D2 70 is forecast and 60 is safety stock.
    Now S1 will first give 20 to D2 from its supply and make demands at both location equal, after that it will supply to both the location such that forecast requirement at both location remains equal.
    for example if available supply is 100 it will give 20 to D1 and remaining 80 it will divide as 40 & 40 between D1 & D2.
    So d1 will get 40 and D2 will get 60.
    now assume if supply is 180 it will first meet demand of 50 & 70 at D1 & D2 and remaining 60 it will distribute between D1 and D2 such that the perecentage of safety stock requirement is equal i.e. x/50 = (60-x)/60.
    I think you will get the bhavior if you use the above eg and try on ur system.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Sanjog

  • Fair share logic in Backorder Processing - APOBO040 -

    We are thinking to use backorder processing in GATP process. However, one of the expectations of our customer is "fair share logic" during the confirmation of sales orders. Let me clarify what I mean:
    1- We have following sales orders in hand with the mentioned sorting.
    _________Req. Quantity
    SO1________20 pieces
    SO2________20 pieces
    SO3_________1 piece
    SO4_________1 piece
    2 - Assume that the total of our stocks and planned orders are 40 pieces. Then the system will give confirmation to the orders as follows:
    __________Req. Quantity______Confirmed Quantity
    SO1________20 pieces___________20 pieces
    SO2________20 pieces___________20 pieces
    SO3_________1 piece____________No confirmation  
    SO4_________1 piece____________No confirmation
    3 - However we want to achieve such a confirmation distribution.
    __________Req. Quantity______Confirmed Quantity
    SO1________20 pieces___________19 pieces
    SO2________20 pieces___________19 pieces
    SO3_________1 piece_____________1 piece 
    SO4_________1 piece_____________1 piece
    As we have seen from the in the customizing of APO this is somehow possible with the user exit "EXIT_/SAPAPO/SAPLBOP_040" - scope of check-
    (APO Customizing / GATP / Enhancements / Backorder Processing / Define Scope of Check for Batch Backorder Processing)
    Do you have information about this topic, have you tried this solution before, is it working???
    If anybody can help, we really appreciate.
    Thanks in advance and Best Regards

    Hello there, This is in refrence to the doc posted in the link
    Re: Fair share logic in Backorder Processing - APOBO040 -
    I actually have the same requirement and want to implement the fair share logic by using the below mentioned User Exit...  .But the last line in the documentation below says that "This is only possible for the basic methods product availability check and product allocation.""  ....
    Can I implement the  same for Rules Based ATP ..  actually we are using Rules Bases Sustn in cunjunction with BOP.
    Please let me know if you any idea about this fair share ?? Can this be done ??
    Regards,
    Amit --  [email protected]
    > I dont know If you have gone through this document:
    > The lines in bold explains clearly uptill what extent
    > you can do the FAIR SHARE RULE.
    >
    > I believe we cannot do <b>EXACTLY</b> what you have
    > stated in your example.
    > Availability Check is the core for comfirmation of a
    > sales order.
    >
    > Whatever customizing you do in the user exit, donot
    > attemp to do your own availability check logic...
    >
    > GOOD LUCK and let us know when you have done the
    > coding.
    > ******************************************************
    > *******************************
    > <b>EXIT_/SAPAPO/SAPLBOP_040 :</b>
    >
    > ATP, BOP: Scope of Check for Backorder Processing
    > Functionality
    > The user exit is called in backorder processing
    > before the availability check is called.
    >
    > The requirements to be checked and the correction
    > quantities of the separate basic methods are
    > transferred to the function module.
    >
    > Depending on the settings for backorder processing,
    > the requirements to be checked are either the
    > original requirement (requirement check) or the
    > current confirmation of the document (confirmation
    > check). Scheduling has already been performed
    > (according to the settings for the check
    > parameters).
    > The requirements are transferred into four tables.
    > The contents of these tables are linked to each other
    > by indexes.
    > <b>The requirements to be checked can be changed, for
    > example, if you want to implement a fair share logic.
    > Changing the requirements has no effect on the
    > quantities originally required in the documents.
    > <u><i>The change only limits the maximum quantity you
    > can allocate to a document.</i></u>
    > The correction quantities are determined for each
    > basic method. By reducing the correction quantities
    > you can prevent the total quantity being divided
    > between the documents to be checked.
    > You must not change the adjustment entries for
    > planning.</b>
    >
    > ***************************************************
    > APOBO040 scope of check:
    >
    > Scope of Check for Batch Backorder Processing
    > The function module EXIT_/SAPAPO/SAPLBOP_040 is
    > called before the availability check in backorder
    > processing. The documents have already been selected
    > (filter) and sorted.
    >
    > Environment
    > The requirements to be checked and the corresponding
    > correction quantities of the individual basic methods
    > are transferred to the function module.
    >
    > By changing (reducing) the requirements, a fair share
    > logic can be implemented using this function module.
    >
    > By changing (reducing) the correction quantities,
    > quantities can be protected from distribution via
    > backorder processing. This is only possible for the
    > basic methods product availability check and product
    > allocation.
    >
    > Message was edited by:
    >         Kumar Ayyagari

  • I have an IPad 2, 3G WiFi unlimited internet access, How can I share it with my PC laptop?

    I have an IPad2 3G WiFi with unlimited internet access, but i want to share it with my PC laptop.
    I already have an Iphone with such feature, however I have only 5 Gb by month, I know the easiest way is to interchange SIM cards, but it would make more expensive my phone calls.

    With the current iPad you can't, I believe that the personal hotspot function is only available on the new iPad

  • Weblogic work manager - Control min./max. threads & fair share

    I have an application which is running on Weblogic 10.3.2. I need to be able to control the number of threads the server assigns to this application. The application has 3 MDBs and for each of these MDBs, we need to assign a weight so that that the available threads are distributed among the 3 MDBs according to the weight.
    After going through the Weblogic documentation, it looks like I could create 3 work managers with the min. threads, max. threads and fair share. These work managers could be assigned to each of the MDBs. But, this does not control the total number of threads the server assigns to the application.
    Question:
    Is there a way we can create a work manager with the min. threads and max. threads and assign it to the whole application? This could be used to control the min./max. threads assigned to the application. Then we could define 3 work managers with the fair share and assign them to the individual MDBs.

    Hi ,
    You can create a work manager with min. threads and max. threads constraints defined. Check this:
    http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/articles/entarch/workload-management3-087769.html
    Thanks,
    Sharmela

  • Issue Deployment rounding value & Fair Share

    Hello All,
           I have tested the deployment (SCM 7.0) with the rounding values and observed some strange results. Please find my cases below. And the deployment was executed on the production plant.
    Case 1:
    Location = DC1
    Demand = 5000
    Rounding Value= 1
    Location = DC2
    Demand = 3000
    Rounding Value= 1
    Location = PP
    Demand =0
    Stock= 1000
    Rounding Value= 1
    Location = DC3
    Demand = 2000
    Rounding Value= 1000
    Deployment Result:
    700 on DC1 and 300 on DC2
    Expected Result:
    625 on DC1 and 375 on DC2
    Case 2:
    Location = DC1
    Demand = 5000
    Rounding Value= 2
    Location = DC2
    Demand = 3000
    Rounding Value= 2
    Location = PP
    Demand =0
    Stock= 1000
    Rounding Value= 2
    Location = DC3
    Demand = 2000
    Rounding Value= 1000
    Deployment Result:
    700 on DC1 and 300 on DC2
    Expected Result:
    626 on DC1 and 374 on DC2
    Case 3:
    Location = DC1
    Demand = 5000
    Rounding Value= 1
    Location = DC2
    Demand = 3000
    Rounding Value= 1
    Location = PP
    Demand =0
    Stock= 1000
    Rounding Value= 1
    Location = DC3
    Demand = 2000
    Rounding Value= 1
    Deployment Result:
    500 on DC1, 300 on DC2 and 200 on DC3
    Expected Result:
    500 on DC1, 300 on DC2 and 200 on DC3
    Case 4:
    Location = DC1
    Demand = 5000
    Rounding Value= 1000
    Location = DC2
    Demand = 3000
    Rounding Value= 1000
    Location = PP
    Demand =0
    Stock= 1000
    Rounding Value= 1000
    Location = DC3
    Demand = 2000
    Rounding Value= 1000
    Deployment Result:
    1000 on DC1
    Expected Result:
    1000 on PP
    Master Data:
    Pull Deployment Horizon           : 28
    Fair Share               : A
    Push Deployment Horizon          : 999
    Only case 3 works as expected.
    Please let me know if I missing somethning.
    Thanks,
    Siva.
    Edited by: sivaprakash pandian on Nov 18, 2009 9:34 PM
    Edited by: sivaprakash pandian on Nov 18, 2009 9:52 PM

    Hi,
    I have compared the product location combination in MAT1 for DC2 and DC3, all of settings are same except Rounding value and Minimum Lot Size in subview Lot Size. Do you think it's because of the Rounding Value?
    I also checked the TL for DC1->DC2 and DC1->DC3, TLB Profile is difference between each other, but the total volume and total weight calculated with the value distributed proportionally from ATD Quantity is below than the constraint in  TLB profile. therefore I think TLB is no issue.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Quanyin Su

  • Fair Share Rule A & B

    Hi Experts,
    can you explain the logic with examples on how Fair share Rule A & B works in APO deployment.
    Best Regards,
    Anandharaj

    Hi Anandharaj,
    I have seen you are new in SCN. According to the SCN Rules we should search before posting a new thread. Take a look of the Rules:
    The SCN Rules of Engagement
    I have found lot of threads and different documentation and examples in google explaining the Fair Share Rules A & B. Including examples. Here you have a couple:
    deployment fair share rules
    SNP Deployment and Fair Share - SAP Planning
    Thanks and Regards,
    Mariano

  • Fair share rule B

    hi,
    Can any one explain about fair share rule B with target stk level method 4.  and how % of fullfillment calculated with respect to target stk level in destination location.

    Hi,
    I assume you are using safety stock also, so all the requiremnts will have two parts Forecast and Safety Stock required.
    For example the requirement propagated to a source location S1 from two destination location is D1 = 100 & D2 = 130.
    Now out of this for D1 50 is forecast and 50 is safety stock req and for D2 70 is forecast and 60 is safety stock.
    Now S1 will first give 20 to D2 from its supply and make demands at both location equal, after that it will supply to both the location such that forecast requirement at both location remains equal.
    for example if available supply is 100 it will give 20 to D1 and remaining 80 it will divide as 40 & 40 between D1 & D2.
    So d1 will get 40 and D2 will get 60.
    now assume if supply is 180 it will first meet demand of 50 & 70 at D1 & D2 and remaining 60 it will distribute between D1 and D2 such that the perecentage of safety stock requirement is equal i.e. x/50 = (60-x)/60.
    I think you will get the bhavior if you use the above eg and try on ur system.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Sanjog

  • Fair share request class usage

    Hi,
    Here are my doubts regarding the fair share request class usage
    1->I have only one custom work manager with fair share value configured as 100 (value between 1 to 1000 as per oracle docs), will the remaining request share goes to default work manager ? or the fair share request class should be configured only with multiple custom work manager as to be shared between them ?
    2->If i have 2 custom work manager with fare share value 100, 50. whats the meaning with respect to sharing the request ? again will default work manager comes into picture for remaining share ?
    Please help
    Thanks,
    Sandeep

    Maybe this is of some help: Re: SelfTuningWorkManager

  • I have one apple ID and multiple family members share this with their devices.  How do we keep pics and messages separate?

    I have one apple ID and multiple family members share this with their individual devices.  How do we keep pics and messages separate for each device?

    For messages
    MacMost Now 653: Setting Up Multiple iOS Devices For Messages and FaceTime
    For other issue:
    How to use multiple iPods, iPads, or iPhones with one computer
    What is the best way to manage multiple...: Apple Support Communities

  • How do I use iTunes shar to share apps with in my household

    I heard that sharing apps with in a household is ok. So I wanna co it but not sure how to do it with I tunes share. Help please

    The apps that you share will be associated with your Apple ID, even if you share them with family members. So if an app needs to be updated, then you shall have to sign into your Apple ID on the computers or iOS devices which have the apps installed in order to update them.
    Probably the easiest way to share the apps is to copy them from your computer to the other computers in your family and then authorize those computers with your Apple ID. You can authorize up to five (5) computers, including your own, to use your iTunes stuff. On a Mac the apps are stored at this location; ~/Music/iTunes/iTunes Media/Mobile Applications/ (I have no idea where they are on a Windows box!) Drag & drop the apps that you wish to share from that location onto the iTunes app on the other Macs or PCs over your LAN or other direct connection. Or copy them from that location onto a USB stick and then drag & drop them onto iTunes on the other computers. After you authorize those computers for your iTunes stuff, the apps can be synced to iOS devices. You authorize the computer to use your iTunes stuff in the computer's iTunes app's Store menu.
    There are other more complicated methods of moving the apps around to share.

  • Adobe Creative Cloud - How To Share Files With Clients and Colleagues | Creative Suite Podcast: Designers | Adobe TV

    In this episode of the Adobe Creative Suite Podcast, Terry White shows how to share Photoshop, Illustrator and InDesign Files with clients and colleagues and all they'll need is a browser to comment and see your Photoshop Layers.
    http://adobe.ly/10ZjpE4

    Terry,
    I guess I miss something. How can I share a folder of photos? When I return from a shoot, I select 20 of the pictures and need to share them with my client to pick up the favorites. Am I supposed to copy and past an URL for each image separately?
    Sometimes I also work with a colleague, I need to share my favorites with him. Same issue.
    We have tried Adobe Cloud, and then went for Dropbox. There we can share a folder and he can put even his pictures in it as well. That's what I call collaboration. And it is free (unlike Adobe Cloud). If you have some word in Adobe, please tell them to either drop it and make a deal with services like Dropbox, or make it properly.
    Thanks.
    Vaclav

  • I am trying to share calendars with my husband (using Google calendars). He can see my calendars, but I am having trouble seeing his. We both use iPhones.

    I am trying to share calendars with my husband (using Google calendars). He can see my calendars, but I am having trouble seeing his. We both use iPhones. We both have company email addresses. I have had to install and uninstall my gmail info on my iPhone multiple times due to errors sending and receiving emails from my company email address on my phone. For some reason, all of my emails are getting stuck in my outbox when my gmail account is installed on my phone. When I delete it, my emails get sent automatically. This is really annoying! I would do without the gmail account, but I need to share calendars with my husband. How do I fix this?

    If you have two-step verification turned on in your email account, you'll have to log in with a browser and turn it off.

  • How do i share iTunes with my wifes user account?

    I decided to buy an IMac and although im not entirely useless with it, im really struggling to resist the temptation to put it back in the box.
    the 2 main problems are our ITunes account and our contracts.
    both myself and my wife now have each others contacts on our phones.
    i have set up my wife a separate user account, however I cannot work out how to share iTunes with her.
    I have set her up a separate icloud  account and now she has no contacts whatsoever.    
    is there any support that could log onto the system and correct a few things here as im running out of ideas.
    thanks in advance.

    You have to turn on Sharing and then Authenticate Sharing on the other devices. You can have up to 5.

  • I have an old mpg video file, taken with a very early model "smart phone", that opens and plays fine in my newly "rebuilt" iPhoto library. I cannot open, edit it or share it with any other software. How can I fix it, to be able to do anything with it?

    I have an old mpg video file, taken with a very early model "smart phone", that opens and plays fine in my newly "rebuilt" iPhoto library. I cannot open, edit it or share it with any other software. How can I fix it, to be able to do anything with it?
    Detail:
    I've recently purchaced a 4TB Thunderbolt drive to store my "vast" music and photo libraries. iPhoto had an issue reading the moved library, so I bought and used iPhoto Library Manager to "rebuild" it. Apart from much of the original data such as date taken & camera used etc, it appears to be working well. The aforementioned mpg video was taken some 9 years ago, using an early model "iMate" smart phone, and opens and plays fine on iPhoto, but I cannot open it with anything else, (I've tried iMovie, VLC players, Wondershare and Handbrake) nor can I share it. I just want to edit it, and share it with family.
    Any help would be appreciated...

    No - not iMovie, VLC, Wondershare or Handbrake... Quick time starts with a "CONVERTING", then I get
    I've looked at the "tell me more" links, tried downloading some of the movie players there. I'm begining to think the file is corrupt.
    Thanks for getting back to me again though - appreciate it...

Maybe you are looking for