Fault Handling at UMS level

I have created a composite which sends an email to a client using UMS.
There are no issues till the email goes out successfully but if UMS logs any error while sending the email, the error remains untraceable to the composite and it completes successfully.
Is there a way to handle such faults at composite level?
Can we resend the email through UMS server/email driver (which I assume should be present in the UMS queue), once a fault is captured?
Please provide your inputs.
Thanks,
@bhi
Edited by: 1000762 on Jun 5, 2013 11:21 AM

No, you can't wrap class-level variable declarations in try-catch blocks. Declare
the variables at the class level, do the assignment in you constructor,
and wrap the code there in a try-catch block.

Similar Messages

Fault Handling in 11g

Hi,
I am new to this bpel.I want to ask a basic question regarding bpel fault handling management frmawork ..
My BPELProcess1 has just a throw activity with receive and reply activity.and I throw a bindingfault there.
Then I added two xml files(fault-policies and fault-binding) where composite.xml resides and added property elment in the composite.xml.
So,I think here fault policy and binding will work fine .But when I execute it I don't find any recovery option in em console.
fault-binding.xml ->
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<faultPolicyBindings version="2.0.1"
xmlns="http://schemas.oracle.com/bpel/faultpolicy"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<component faultPolicy="myFaultHandling">
<name>BPELProcess1</name>
</component>
</faultPolicyBindings>
and fault-policies.xml file looks like
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<faultPolicies xmlns="http://schemas.oracle.com/bpel/faultpolicy">
<faultPolicy version="2.0.1" id="mylFaultHandling"
xmlns:env="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
xmlns="http://schemas.oracle.com/bpel/faultpolicy"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<Conditions>
<faultName xmlns:bpelx="http://schemas.oracle.com/bpel/extension"
name="bpelx:bindingFault">
<condition>
<action ref="ora-human-intervention"/>
</condition>
</faultName>
</Conditions>
<Actions>
<Action id="ora-human-intervention">
<humanIntervention/>
</Action>
</Actions>
</faultPolicy>
</faultPolicies>
and added this to the composite.xml
<property name="oracle.composite.faultPolicyFile">fault-policies.xml</property>
<property name="oracle.composite.faultBindingFile">fault-bindings.xml</property>
My question is
1.Do I need to add a catch/catchAll block in bpel file ?and I want to know is it only a substitute mechanism to avoid catch/catchAll blok..
2>Is there any way that I can catch the all project fault in a single framework by configuring em console rather than adding catch block or policy xml in each project ?
Edited by: blue bell on May 3, 2011 4:46 AM

Hi,
+2>Is there any way that I can catch the all project fault in a single framework by configuring em console rather than adding catch block or policy xml in each project ?+
For define the fault policies at the global level for all you project composites...u share the fault-policies.xml,fault-bindings.xml from mds and apply them to each composite.

Fault handling policy for a process in the fault-binding.xml

Can I specify a fault handling policy for a specific process using fault handling framework 10.1.3.3?
<process faultPolicy="DefaultPolicy"/>
I cannot specify the name of the process according to the xsd :(
Can this be achieved?
I have a two different partner links in different processes having the same name. If I add the partner link to the fault-binding.xml what would be the result?
Note: I cannot use bpel.xml to specify the fault policies as of now.

The fault policy bindings file does not allow you to specify a specific fault policy for an individual processes. You can only do this for all BPEL processes (eg: process Level) or at finer grained levels such as partner link levels.
You might be able to use the partner link level for any services that call the process in which you wnat to error handle (eg: Process C needs to be error handled. Process A and B call C so for the partner link names for invoking C could have the fault policy defined for them). Therefore any faults returned from C could propagate back to process A / B and be handled within by the policy outside of Process C. Obviously if this apporach was used you would not want to use process level definitions as C would continue to use this.
If the partner links were of the same name, they should both be handled by the fault policy that is defined withiin the Fault policy (e.g Partner Link level definitions)
An approach that can be used is to specify the fault policy within the bpel.xml file. The information would be added as follows:
</partnerLinkBindings>

<faultPolicyBindings>
<process faultPolicy="AProcessFaultPolicy"/>
<partnerLink faultPolicy="APartnerLinnkPolicy">
<name>insertSSN_dbAdapter</name>
<name>Another_Adapter</name>
</partnerLink>
</faultPolicyBindings>

</BPELProcess>
</BPELSuitcase>
However, I noted you said you were unable to do this. I wasn't sure if this was for technical/governamce reasons or knowledge reasons (unsure where to place to the details.
Hope that helps and does not confuse matters
Dave

System Fault handler

Hi,
I am trying to catch the remoteFault and used the catch branch and used Namespace URI as http://schemas.oracle.com/bpel/extension Local Part: remoteFault and fault Variable: faultVar.
But when assingning the faultVar is not showing its elements code, summary and details. It is weird that it is showing in some BPEL process and not showing in some BPEL process. Is something need to take care while using system fault?
Regards,
Sreejit

Hi Sreejit,
There is often a need to use an activity that does nothing. An example is when a fault must be caught and suppressed. In this case, you can use the empty activity to insert a no-op instruction into a business process. The syntax to use an empty activity is as follows:
<empty standard-attributes>
standard-elements
</empty>
If no catch or catchAll is selected, the fault is not caught by the current scope and is rethrown to the immediately enclosing scope. If the fault occurs in (or is rethrown to) the global process scope, and there is no matching fault handler for the fault at the global level, the process terminates abnormally. This is as though a terminate activity (described in "Using the Terminate Activity to Stop a Business Process Instance") had been performed.
Consider the following example:
<faulthandlers>
<catch faultName="x:foo">
<empty/>
</catch>
<catch faultVariable="bar">
<empty/>
</catch>
<catch faultName="x:foo" faultVariable="bar">
<empty/>
</catch>
<catchAll>
<empty/>
</catchAll>
</faulthandlers>
Assume that a fault named x:foo is thrown. The first catch is selected if the fault carries no fault data. If there is fault data associated with the fault, the third catch is selected if the type of the fault's data matches the type of variable bar. Otherwise, the default catchAll handler is selected. Finally, a fault with a fault variable whose type matches the type of bar and whose name is not x:foo is processed by the second catch. All other faults are processed by the default catchAll handler.
Invoking a compensation handler that has not been installed is equivalent to using the empty activity (it is a no-op). This ensures that fault handlers do not have to rely on state to determine which nested scopes have completed successfully. The semantics of a process in which an installed compensation handler is invoked more than once are undefined.If an invoke activity has a compensation handler defined inline, then the name of the activity is the name of the scope to be used in the compensate activity. The syntax is as follows:
<compensate scope="ncname"? standard-attributes>
standard-elements
</compensate>
Hope this is much clearer and answers your question!
Cheers
Anirudh Pucha

How to register multiple stages in fault handler?

Hi,
I am trying to create multiple fault handlers for multiple CQL processors.
I understand how to create one handler but when I am trying to add another osgi service to rgister anothet fault handler I get strange behaviot in theeclipse. The EPN disappears.Any advice?
Another question - how do I register multiple stages to the same handler?

Hi,
I am trying to create multiple fault handlers for multiple CQL processors.
I understand how to create one handler but when I am trying to add another osgi service to rgister anothet fault handler I get strange behaviot in theeclipse. The EPN disappears.Any advice?
Another question - how do I register multiple stages to the same handler?

What are the different approaches to do Fault Handling?

What are the different approaches to do Fault Handling?

for uplodig data to non sap we have 2 methodes
i) if u know bapi u will use lasm
2) bdc
but u mentioned so many records isthere
best thing is u will uplode all record sto al11 using XI interface
then u have to write bdc / lsmw program
beter to go for lsmw before that u will find bapi
if u will unable to find bapi
u have to create bapi and use it in lasmw
ofter that u have schedule the lsmw program as a bockground
then u have to create a job for it
and release from sm 37
then u have to moniter through bd87
if u want to go through i will help u.
if it is usefull to u pls give points
Saimedha

Clarification needed in the Fault Handling Framework(Error Hospital)

Hi,
I need some clarification on Fault Handling Framework...
Scenario:
My BPEL Process is Asynchronous.(10.1.3.3.1) and I tryed to invoke the another BPEL Process( which is used to select the Fname from the table using DB Adapter) . In the Main BPEL Process I have the Fault handling Framework and I done necessary changes in the bpel.xml. This is successfully working for Invoke Activity when ever an Remote or Binding Fault occurs in the Sub-BPEL Process and this Fault is send to Fault-Policy.xml in the server(bpel/domains/default/config/fault-Policy) and works accordingly to the action mentioned in the policy xml....( I have also made changes in the fault-bindings.xml ).
How ever this Framework is working fine for every actions.
Need Clarification:
1) Only the Binding and Remote faults will work for the Fault handling Framework.
2) can we use User defined faults (Buissness Faults,,,) for this........because I used the User defined faults to invoke the fault-policy.xml and it won't works....
3)Only Invoke Activity can be handled for this Framework or any Other Activity........
4)How to handle other Activity in the Fault-policy.xml...
5)Any difference for Asynchronous or Synchronous in this Fault Handling Framework.......
I also referred the Oracle SOA Suite New Feauters PDF .......
Can any one send me the related documents and try to help me on this.
Please help me on this.......
Thanks,
Ashok.

Hi Chintan,
You are saying that Custom faults are also supported for fault-Policy.xml.
I can't understand that 2nd answer you said. can you please explain how to use the Custom faults in the FaultHandlingFramework..
My Scenario:
I have 2 BPEL Process, BPEL1 will invoke the BPEL2 and if any remote fault or binding faults occurs in the BPEL 2 its returning the same fault to BPEL1 and here I am using FaulthandlingFramework , this fault send to fault-policy.xml and necessary action is took place succesfuly...(like retry, human intervention.....)
But when I throw some CustomFaults(userdefinedFaults)in the BPEL2 , its returning as a remotefault to BPEL1. I don't know how to use the customFaults in the Fault handling framework.......
Can you explain me in detail how to use custom faults in faulthandling framework...............
Send me some related documents for this.....

Fault Handling in BPEL process

hi
We have to develop an application which involves several BPEL processes and proxy service(OSB) and JMS queue etc.
What is the difference between Fault Management Framework in SOA11g and normal fault handling(using catch and throw activities)?
which one we should prefer for fault handling in our application n why?
Plz help thanks in advance.

Hi-
In Normal Fault handling process, you will be able to catch the faluts only but in Fault Management Framework if a fault occurs the framework catches the fault and performs a user-specified action defined in a fault policy file associated with the activity. You can also have a human intervention prescribed in it, where you perform recovery actions from Enterprise Manager.
Pls go throgh the below post for detailed description
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E12839_01/integration.1111/e10224/bp_faults.htm
Fault Management Framework and non BPEL soap faults
Edited by: 333333 on Mar 23, 2011 5:01 PM

Fault handling for Mediator component

I am trying to capture all the system and business faults of the composite and email the details to system groups. I am having issues with the fault policy file and get the following error. My Composite is made up of Web Services ---> Mediator ---->DBAdapter
INFO: FaultPoliciesParser.parsePolicies ------->Begin Parsing of policy file
<Jun 18, 2012 3:48:58 PM EST> <Error> <oracle.soa.mediator.common.error.recovery> <BEA-000000> <Failed to recover the mediator fault.
oracle.fabric.common.FabricException: Missing fault policy: TESTFaultPolicy
at oracle.integration.platform.faultpolicy.RecoverFault.resolveToActionRef(RecoverFault.java:101)
at oracle.integration.platform.faultpolicy.FaultRecoveryManagerImpl.resolveToActionRef(FaultRecoveryManagerImpl.java:151)
at oracle.tip.mediator.common.error.recovery.MediatorRecoveryHandler.resolveToActionRef(MediatorRecoveryHandler.java:158)
at oracle.tip.mediator.common.error.ErrorMessageEnqueuer.enqueue(ErrorMessageEnqueuer.java:174)
at oracle.tip.mediator.dispatch.db.DeferredDBWorker.handleError(DeferredDBWorker.java:117)
at oracle.tip.mediator.common.listener.DBWorker.process(DBWorker.java:114)
at oracle.tip.mediator.common.listener.AbstractWorker.run(AbstractWorker.java:83)
at oracle.integration.platform.blocks.executor.WorkManagerExecutor$1.run(WorkManagerExecutor.java:120)
at weblogic.work.j2ee.J2EEWorkManager$WorkWithListener.run(J2EEWorkManager.java:183)
at weblogic.work.DaemonWorkThread.run(DaemonWorkThread.java:30)
I am attaching the following files
FAULT-POLICIES.XML*
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<faultPolicies xmlns="http://schemas.oracle.com/bpel/faultpolicy"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<faultPolicy version="2.0.1" id="TESTFaultPolicy">
<Conditions>
<faultName>
<condition>
<action ref="ora-java"/>
</condition>
</faultName>
</Conditions>
<Actions>
<Action id="ora-java">
<javaAction className="test.EmailFaultHandler"
defaultAction="ora-human-intervention">
</javaAction>
</Action>
</Actions>
</faultPolicy>
</faultPolicies>
FAULT-BINDINGS.XML_
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<faultPolicyBindings version="2.0.1"
xmlns="http://schemas.oracle.com/bpel/faultpolicy">
<composite faultPolicy="TESTFaultPolicy"/>
<component faultPolicy=" TESTFaultPolicy">
<name>HandleRealTimeRequests</name>
</component>
</faultPolicyBindings>
I am yet to figure out how to capture the fault and email to the groups in EmailFaultHandler.java file below
EmailFaultHandler.java_
package test;
import com.collaxa.cube.engine.fp.BPELFaultRecoveryContextImpl;
import java.util.Map;
import oracle.integration.platform.faultpolicy.IFaultRecoveryContext;
import oracle.integration.platform.faultpolicy.IFaultRecoveryJavaClass;
public class EmailFaultHandler implements IFaultRecoveryJavaClass {
public void handleRetrySuccess(IFaultRecoveryContext iFaultRecoveryContext) {
public String handleFault(IFaultRecoveryContext iFaultRecoveryContext) {
//Print Fault Meta Data to Console
System.out.println("****************Fault Metadata********************************");
System.out.println("Fault policy id: " + iFaultRecoveryContext.getPolicyId());
System.out.println("Fault type: " + iFaultRecoveryContext.getType());
System.out.println("Partnerlink: " + iFaultRecoveryContext.getReferenceName());
System.out.println("Port type: " + iFaultRecoveryContext.getPortType());
System.out.println("**************************************************************");
//print all properties defined in the fault-policy file
System.out.println("Properties Set for the Fault");
Map props = iFaultRecoveryContext.getProperties();
for (Object key: props.keySet())
System.out.println("Key : " + key.toString() + " Value : " + props.get(key).toString());
//Custom Code to Log Fault to File/DB/JMS or send Emails etc.
return "Manual";
Please suggest
Thanks
Edited by: user5108636 on 18/06/2012 00:20
Edited by: user5108636 on 18/06/2012 00:20

By the way, I managed to break through a little further. Now I am past this fault policy error. However, the java fault handler class is giving ClassNotFoundException. The way I added the java file (test.EmailFaultHandler) through JDeveloper in the composite project (Right click --> New ---> Java file). How do I add this to the classpath. I thought it automatically gets added to the SOA composite project classpath.
Please suggest.
INFO: FaultPoliciesParser.parsePolicies ------->Begin Parsing of policy file
<Jun 19, 2012 10:58:01 AM EST> <Warning> <oracle.soa.mediator.monitor> <BEA-000000> <Venkat:Inside Synchronized block with msg id :CCA40B60B9A911E1BF115F9190ABA14C>
<Jun 19, 2012 10:58:01 AM EST> <Warning> <oracle.soa.mediator.monitor> <BEA-000000> <Venkat:Inside Synchronized block with msg id :CCA40B60B9A911E1BF115F9190ABA14C>
<Jun 19, 2012 10:58:01 AM EST> <Warning> <oracle.soa.mediator.monitor> <BEA-000000> <Venkat:Inside Synchronized block with msg id :CCA40B60B9A911E1BF115F9190ABA14C>
<Jun 19, 2012 10:58:01 AM EST> <Error> <oracle.soa.mediator.common.listener> <BEA-000000> <Enququeing to Error hospital successful...>
<Jun 19, 2012 10:58:05 AM EST> <Error> <oracle.soa.mediator.common.error.recovery> <BEA-000000> <Error while loading "test.EmailFaultHandler" java class specified for action "ora-java".>
<Jun 19, 2012 10:58:05 AM EST> <Error> <oracle.soa.mediator.common.error.recovery> <BEA-000000> <Failed to recover the mediator fault.
java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: test.EmailFaultHandler
at weblogic.utils.classloaders.GenericClassLoader.findLocalClass(GenericClassLoader.java:297)
at weblogic.utils.classloaders.GenericClassLoader.findClass(GenericClassLoader.java:270)
at weblogic.utils.classloaders.ChangeAwareClassLoader.findClass(ChangeAwareClassLoader.java:64)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:307)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:248)
at weblogic.utils.classloaders.GenericClassLoader.loadClass(GenericClassLoader.java:179)
at weblogic.utils.classloaders.ChangeAwareClassLoader.loadClass(ChangeAwareClassLoader.java:43)
at oracle.tip.mediator.common.error.recovery.CustomJavaHandler.execute(CustomJavaHandler.java:69)
at oracle.tip.mediator.common.error.recovery.MediatorRecoverFault.recover(MediatorRecoverFault.java:73)
at oracle.tip.mediator.serviceEngine.MediatorFacadeService.recoverFault(MediatorFacadeService.java:988)
at oracle.integration.platform.faultpolicy.RecoverFault.recoverAndChain(RecoverFault.java:161)
at oracle.integration.platform.faultpolicy.RecoverFault.resolveAndRecover(RecoverFault.java:124)
at oracle.integration.platform.faultpolicy.FaultRecoveryManagerImpl.resolveAndRecover(FaultRecoveryManagerImpl.java:123)
at oracle.tip.mediator.common.error.recovery.MediatorRecoveryHandler.recover(MediatorRecoveryHandler.java:116)
at oracle.tip.mediator.common.error.ErrorDBWorker.handleMessage(ErrorDBWorker.java:37)
Thanks

Fault Handling Issue in OSB

Hi,
This is regarding SOAP fault handling in OSB11g.
i am expecting that whenever OSB proxy service recieves a fault response the flow should move to service error handler if any. But its not happening.
We tested our service with SOA Test stubs and SOAP UI mock services. When SOA test stub send fault response OSB considering it as normal response. But when the same fault is sent by SOAP UI mock service OSB is considering it as fault and going to service error handler.
Now the same is happening when we replaced the service provider with one of the .NET service. The fault response is in SOAP 1.1 structure.
Please let me whats the difference or any setting or HTTP response code we need to look at.
Thanks & Regards
Siva

Hi Anuj,
I am using the same fault structure which is working in Soap UI mock service. Still its not working in Soa test stub. And now facing the same issue when fault comes from .NET based service provider.
Will verify once to see whats the response code thats being sent.
Thanks
Siva

Fault Handling in Mediator

Hi,
We have a DBAdpater to retrieve the data and a mediator to invoke the DBAdapter. In cases like No Records we want to create a soap fault. So we implemented Mediator Java callout and overriden postRouting() to read the response message and create a soapfault.
[ we referred to blog http://technology.amis.nl/blog/6669/soa-suite-11g-introducing-mediator-java-callouts-for-debug-audit-and]
but when we tried creating SOAPFault and add it to the response message, while execution , the response message is being parsed and seeing the fault it is throwing the exception below:
java.lang.Exception: oracle.sysman.emSDK.webservices.wsdlapi.SoapTestException:
This is a fault.
at oracle.sysman.emas.model.wsmgt.WSTestModel.invokeOperation(WSTestMode
l.java:575)
at oracle.sysman.emas.view.wsmgt.WSView.invokeOperation(WSView.java:381)
at oracle.sysman.emas.view.wsmgt.WSView.invokeOperation(WSView.java:298)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.
java:39)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAcces
sorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
at com.sun.el.parser.AstValue.invoke(AstValue.java:157)
at com.sun.el.MethodExpressionImpl.invoke(MethodExpressionImpl.java:283)
at org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.taglib.util.MethodExpressionMetho
dBinding.invoke(MethodExpressionMethodBinding.java:53)
at org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.component.UIXComponentBase.broadcastToMet
hodBinding(UIXComponentBase.java:1259)
at org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.component.UIXCommand.broadcast(UIXCommand
.java:183)
I found that if exception from mediator is not handled, then the exception is throw as system fault as shown above.
So we tried implementing external fault handling - by creating fault-policies.xml and fault-bindings.xml and a java callout.
fault-bindings.xml
<?xml version=”1.0" encoding=”UTF-8"?>
<faultPolicyBindings version=”2.0.1" xmlns=”http://schemas.oracle.com/bpel/faultpolicy”>
<composite faultPolicy=”SOM_ServiceFaults”/>
</faultPolicyBindings>
fault-policies.xml
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<faultPolicies>
<faultPolicy version="2.0.1" id="SOM_ServiceFaults">
<Conditions>
<faultName xmlns:env="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" name="env:Fault"> 
<condition>
     <action ref="ora-custom"/>
</condition>
</faultName>
<faultName xmlns:medns="http://schemas.oracle.com/mediator/faults" name="medns:mediatorFault">
<condition>
<action ref="ora-custom"/>
</condition>
</faultName>
</Conditions>
<Actions>
<Action id=”ora-terminate”>
          <abort/>
     </Action>
<Action id="ora-custom">
<javaAction className="gm.som.FaultPolicyJavaAction" defaultAction="ora-terminate">
<returnValue value="ora-terminate" ref="ora-terminate"/>
</javaAction>
</Action>
</Actions>
</faultPolicy>
</faultPolicies>
But still getting the error.Appreciate any help on this.
Thanks in Advance,
Subhashini

Not exactly but doing it the other way around by copying the fault msg to output variable and check flag for the response in my initial requester process then throw fault accordingly.. didnt have much time as it was holding back my other deliverables
Thanks a lot for your time

Fault handling in DIServer Interact

Good Day Mentors,
I'm currently testing out how the DIServer works.
Now, I am testing Fault handling with the DI Server,
and would want to know if there is a way to get multiple Errors from an DI Server Interact call.
My test scenario was adding 2 Sales Orders into SAP via DI Server using the Interact Call(Not BatchInteract).
The actual SOAP call sent , with comments, is as below:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope">
<env:Header>
<SessionID>5659CCC6-2E15-4664-BFA2-4E6A3BDD3E35</SessionID>
</env:Header>
<env:Body>
<dis:Add xmlns:dis="http://www.sap.com/SBO/DIS">
<Service>OrdersService</Service>
<Document>
<DocType>dDocument_Items</DocType>
<DocDate>2014-05-09</DocDate>
<DocDueDate>2014-05-10</DocDueDate>
<CardCode>C23900</CardCode>
<Comments>DI Server Test - ADD</Comments>
<DocumentLines>
<DocumentLine>
<ItemCode>A00003</ItemCode>
<Quantity>2</Quantity>
</DocumentLine>
<DocumentLine>
<ItemCode>TESTITTEM02</ItemCode> 
<Quantity>2</Quantity>
</DocumentLine>
</DocumentLines>
</Document>
</dis:Add>
<dis:Add xmlns:dis="http://www.sap.com/SBO/DIS">
<Service>OrdersService</Service>
<Document>
<DocType>dDocument_Service</DocType>
<DocDate>2014-05-09</DocDate>
<DocDueDate>2014-05-10</DocDueDate>
<CardCode>C20000</CardCode>
<Comments>DI Server Test - ADD</Comments>
<DocumentLines>
<DocumentLine>
<ItemDescription>Printer Servicing</ItemDescription>
<AccountCode>499999</AccountCode> 
</DocumentLine>
</DocumentLines>
</Document>
</dis:Add>
</env:Body>
</env:Envelope>
I commented the parts that should throw errors, which are the non existent ItemCode and AccountCode in 2 separate Sales Orders.
I was hoping to get a Fault Response from the DIServer which tells me that there are two error from 2 different Documents.
Basically, 2 separate error messages for the 1st Sales order(non existent Item Code) and 2nd Sales Order (Non Existent Account Code).
But the Fault Response I got from the DIServer was this:
<?xml version="1.0" ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope">
<env:Body>
<env:Fault>
<env:Code>
<env:Value>env:Receiver</env:Value>
<env:Subcode>
<env:Value>-1</env:Value>
</env:Subcode>
</env:Code>
<env:Reason>
<env:Text xml:lang="en">Error in SOAP command 'Add'</env:Text>
</env:Reason>
<env:Detail>
<Command>Add</Command>
<SessionID>5659CCC6-2E15-4664-BFA2-4E6A3BDD3E35</SessionID>
</env:Detail>
</env:Fault>
</env:Body>
</env:Envelope>
The fault response only tells me that there is an error, but nothing specific to the documents. Just something specific to the actual SOAP call.
If I something is not clear, please do clarify with me.
I'm using SAP B1 9.0 PL05.
Thanks in advance!
Sean

Hi Sean,
I don't think there is such a feature available. This is standard behaviour in SBO - same for UI and DI API. The first problem/error found will abort the action and message is shown and in this case it is one action ( interact).
regards,
Maik

Fault handling in osb using publish

Hi all,
i am new to OSB, every thing is working fine. i will explain how we design the basically we have inbound and outbound. call inbound as 'aaaa' and outbound as "bbbb". we have created the proxy and BS which will communicate with EBS, BAM and B2B. i have created BS for all the three. from PS i used 2 assign and 1 publish activity. we are publishing directly to BS correspondingly. since i am not using any route activity i could not get the error back or any invocation error messages. can any one tell how to capture the error and place it into BAM report. we can transform data to BAM we just need to get the details about the fault handling in OSB.
thanks ----

Hi prabu,
thanks for your response.
As we have the discussion on this issue for quit a long time. i have configure the error handler in the proxy services when my EBS throws the error. error handler come active and some data is published to bam. here i got the problem is that, the PO which we are sending is one way or fire and forget when using Publish action. when the PO hit the EBS, i.e. when error message is passed through the test XML, error is occuring and and reporting to bam with some null values. i need to capture the data processed at that transaction. is it possible to capture the data in error handler which is errored out in message flow of PS.
can you please help me
thanks--
anil

Fault handling in 11g - fault-bindings.xml for a partnerLink

I'm using 11g and I'm trying to use the fault handling framework for a specific partner link. In fault-bindings.xml I have:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<faultPolicyBindings version="2.0.1" xmlns="http://schemas.oracle.com/bpel/faultpolicy">
<partnerLink faultPolicy="GetDateFaultPolicy">
<name>GetDateService</name>
</partnerLink>
</faultPolicyBindings>
I have a partner link named GetDateService in the bpel that I'd like to defin a policy for, but when I try to compile, I get:
Warning(3,58): Schema validation failed for fault-bindings.xml<Line 3, Column 58>: XML-24534: (Error) Element 'partnerLink' not expected.
Does the framework still allow partnerlinks granularity, it says it does in the docs?
Thanks

Maybe I should have looked at the new schema first.... : }
It's now reference:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<faultPolicyBindings version="2.0.1" xmlns="http://schemas.oracle.com/bpel/faultpolicy">
*<reference faultPolicy="GetDateFaultPolicy">*
<name>GetDateService</name>
*</reference>*
</faultPolicyBindings>
Edited by: Brutus35 on Sep 16, 2010 10:42 AM

11g: Help regarding fault handling framework

I am trying to implement a POC demonstrating the fault handling framework using fault policies. I am trying to handle remote and business faults. These faults are being thrown explicitly in the code. But I dont see the framework coming into picture. Here are the fault policies and fault bindings files
The POC does the following
1. If input is R, throws a remote fault.
2. If input is B1, throws a business fault. There is a catch defined for this. But as we also have a policy for this error, we expect the policy overrides the catch
3. If input is B2, throws a business fault. There is no catch defined for this. We expect the policy to handle this.
4. If any other input, we return a string.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<faultPolicies xmlns="http://schemas.oracle.com/bpel/faultpolicy"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<faultPolicy version="2.0.1" id="ComponentFaults"
xmlns:env="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
xmlns="http://schemas.oracle.com/bpel/faultpolicy"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<Conditions>
<faultName xmlns:bpelx="http://schemas.oracle.com/bpel/extension"
name="bpelx:remoteFault">
<condition>
<action ref="ora-human-intervention"/>
</condition>
</faultName>
<faultName xmlns:ns1="NS_B1"
name="ns1:LP_B1">
<condition>
<action ref="ora-human-intervention"/>
</condition>
</faultName>
<faultName xmlns:ns2="NS_B2"
name="ns2:LP_B2">
<condition>
<action ref="ora-human-intervention"/>
</condition>
</faultName>
</Conditions>
<Actions>
<Action id="ora-human-intervention">
<humanIntervention/>
</Action>
</Actions>
</faultPolicy>
</faultPolicies>
Here is the fault-bindings.xml file
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<faultPolicyBindings version="2.0.1"
xmlns="http://schemas.oracle.com/bpel/faultpolicy"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">

<component faultPolicy="ComponentFaults">
<name>BPEL</name>
</component>
</faultPolicyBindings>

I created another bpel in the same composite that calls the original bpel. So now, those errros are supposed to travel to calling bpel.
Fault policies are coming into effect now. So, one part of the problem is solved, that atleast syntax and all is correct, and the fwk does work (!) but another one has opened - why is the fault not getting handled by the fwk if there is a single bpel that is throwing and not catching those faults.
Also, even in this new avatar, fault b1 is getting handled by the catch in BPEL process, while the fault policies are supposed to override any catches in bpel code.
What I was attempting was, throwing the fault in a bpel process and expecting the fault handling fwk to handle it.
It turns out, the framework is not capable of doing this, its only capable of handling faults coming after an invoke activity.
Consulted Oracle Support on this. Their response
The behavior within the single composite you are seeing is correct and is by design. As the documentation states:
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E12839_01/integration.1111/e10224/bp_faults.htm#BABIGGIB
If a fault occurs during runtime in an invoke activity in a process, the framework catches the fault and performs a user-specified action defined in a fault policy file associated with the activity.
The fault management framework catches all faults (business and runtime) for an invoke activity.
So the above means that unless the fault is thrown in response to an invoke activity the Fault Policy set will not be triggered, which has been confirmed through the test you have uploaded. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Fault Handling at UMS level

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for