FB60 / MIGO / MIRO

What is the main purpose of each of these transactions as it relates to AP?  What are the primary differences between these transactions?

hi Hari
Good question
first os all understand the process of Account payable
there are two scenario
Local purchase
Import purchase
when u purchase a material from vendor, there are flow how to receive material and post the invocie
in local case- u create Purchase requisation - PO -
then u receive a material u capture Excise
J1IEX - Capture excise
then u post good receipt  Through MIGO Transaction
MIGO Means - Good receipt whichever u receipt
here fi entry genrated
Stock a./c dr
GR/IR A/c
then u post the excise through J1IEX
then u post vendor invocie through MIRO T.Code
here fi entry
Vendor Cr
GR/IR Dr
Excise Dr
cess on excise Dr
Secess Dr
u use FB60 and MIRO for Vendor invoice
then u make a payment through
F-53       - Mannual
F110 --       Automatic
If any query revert back
Regards
Roobal

Similar Messages

  • Categoria de Nota na MIGO/MIRO

    Bom dia Pessoal!
    Eu li todas as informações trocadas em relação a entrada da NFe no ERP e arquivamento do XML, porém ainda estou com uma dúvida. Poderiam me ajudar?
    Quando recebemos um DANFE do Fornecedor, ao fazer o lançamento na MIGO/MIRO desta NFe, utilizo a categoria de Nota "tradicional" ou "eletrônica"?
    Att.
    Adriana Simões

    Bom dia Adriana,
    Sobre as postagens no forum, procure criar uma thread (questão) nova para cada problema, de forma a facilitar no apoio e também na procura pelos outros.
    Por exemplo este subject é "Re: Categoria de Nota na MIGO/MIRO"
    Independente dos cenários que você está testando agora está com dois novos problemas:
    1 - Problema no GRC está sim relacionado a PIS/COFINS, acredito que as threads abaixo tragam novas informações:
    Situação Fiscal PIS e COFINS (Tax Situation)
    Validação NF-e Campo CST / IM
    Requisitos para implementação do SPEd NF-e
    Alteração de NF-e
    2-B12_REFNFE trata-se de alguma inconsistência na tag de Nota Fiscal Eletrônica de Referência. Verifique se o valor da REFNFE está com 44 posições de números, ou se está faltando por exemplo o número aleatório ou dígito de controle (verifique se tem espaços entre ou então não tem 44 posições).
    Sendo assim, peço que não economize em threads do forum cada questão é uma questão. De forma que você poderá resolver uma questão e fechá-la e a outra ainda continuará aberta.
    Atenciosamente,
    Fernando Da Ró

  • Difference in Profit center for GR/IR account in MIGO & MIRO Transaction

    1) We have created material 106267 with material type ROH. We have assigned profit center 1001052999 (common profit center) to material.
    2) We have created WBS element MUM-RIV002.SS.RC.RF with profit center 1001052002.
    3) We have created PO 4000000236 for account assignment category u2018Qu2019 for the above material with WBS element MUM-RIV002.SS.RC.RF   . After posting GRN for PO 4000000236 we have identified that for GR/IR account profit center is taken from material master & for stock account profit center is taken from WBS element.
    Please find the below Flow
    In MIGO
    Entry
    Accounting Document number in Entry View
    5000001125
    PSKY          G/L Code      Description
             Amount
         Curr.
              Profit Center
         WBS element
    89          231101     RAW MATERIAL STOCK     2,000.00     INR          1001052002     MUM-RIV002.SS.RC.RF
    96          162101     GR/IR-Material     -2,000.00     INR          1001052999     MUM-RIV002.SS.RC.RF
    Document number in Ledger View
    L.item     PK     SG     Account     Description         Amount     Curr.     Tx     Profit Ctr     WBS element
    1     89          231101     RAW MATERIAL STOCK     2,000.00     INR          1001052002     MUM-RIV002.SS.RC.RF
    2     96          162101     GR/IR-Material     -2,000.00     INR          1001052999     MUM-RIV002.SS.RC.RF
    3     50          162001     InterSegment Clrg     -2,000.00     INR          1001052002     
    4     40          162001     InterSegment Clrg     2,000.00     INR          1001052999     
      It should take profit center from WBS element for GR/IR account & Stock account but for GR/IR account profit center is taking form material master & for stock account profit center is taking from WBS element.
    MIRO
    Entry
    Accounting Document number Entry View
    5100000657
    PK     SG     Account     Description         Amount     Curr.     Tx     Profit Ctr     WBS element
    31          100000     Ambuja Cement Ltd     -1,996.00     INR     V4          
    86          162101     GR/IR-Material     2,000.00     INR     V4     1001052002     MUM-RIV002.SS.RC.RF
    40          254001     VAT Receivable     80     INR     V4          
    50          172103     TDS PAYABLE -194C     -42     INR               
    50          176101     WCT-TDS payable     -42     INR               
    Document number in Ledger View
    PK     SG     Account     Description         Amount     Curr.     Tx     Profit Ctr     WBS element
    31          160100     CRS-Domestic Supp     -1,996.00     INR     V4     1001052002     
    86          162101     GR/IR-Material     2,000.00     INR     V4     1001052002     MUM-RIV002.SS.RC.RF
    40          254001     VAT Receivable     80     INR     V4     1001052002     
    50          172103     TDS PAYABLE -194C     -42     INR          1001052002     
    50          176101     WCT-TDS payable     -42     INR          1001052002     
    In the MIRO Accounting Document profit center for [162101] GR/IR-Material A/C has taken from WBS element
    Please note that we are using document splitting with Profit center is mandatory
    We have created same scenario for Cost center. After posting the GRN profit center is taken from cost center for both GR/IR account in MIGO & MIRO accounting documents.
    Plez help

    Hello
    ANy suggestion for question & if solved do let me know

  • Substitution of account(HKONT) when posting in MIGO/MIRO

    Issue: Need to change account(HKONT) when posting in MIGO/MIRO
    example:       HKONT(GL Account)       KTOSL(Transaction type)
                   1000000001              XX1
                   1000000002              XX2
                   1000000003              XX3
    If XX3 exist then replace hkont of XX1 to hkont of XX2
    expected result is:
                   1000000002              XX1
                   1000000002              XX2
                   1000000003              XX3
    Solution with problems:
    1. Used substitution GGB1>Financial Account>line item for field HKONT. My problem with this is, since the data is in line item. How can I get the replacement of my account(shown above sample). if BSEG structure only shows 1 line item. I tried using bool_data-bseg. but its empty. Im assuming bool_data is used when callup 003(complete document) is triggered.
    I used subtitution field G/L - Exit <UXXX>
    Any Ideas or solutions would be great!!

    if your Substituion exit is called then you can directly change the value of
    BSEG-HKONT there according to your requirement.

  • Sending Mail to  when MIGO,MIRO or VL09 gets triggered

    Hi,
      I have a requirement to send a mail to a designated email address when either MIGO,MIRO or VL09 gets triggered.And we were triggering the mails from the correponding user exits since  triggering mail trigger in the form of delivery output by creating an output type was not faesible for our requirement since we had to do  some more checks for company code,movement type etc before triggering output type to send mail.
    I want to know if this is is not a correct solution from technical point of view to trigger emails from any document processing user exits?
    Thanks,
      Chithra

    I have the same request, did you solve it?

  • Document splitting not working in MIGO/MIRO

    Hi Experts,
    I have the following PO, Account Assignment Categories, F:  Expected double entries are as follows:
    MIGO:
    Debit GL: Expense
    Credit GRIR:
    MIRO:
    Debit GRIR:
    Credit Vendor
    At my expese GL, I have cost center filled in; and in entry view I can read the cost center / profit center (and also segment) in MIGO / MIRO double entry.
    Problem: But, when I click on the General Ledger view, both MIGO/MIRO double entries do not have profit center/segment split.  All of the cost objects (cost center, profit center, segment) do not exist in the General ledger view (these fields are blank).
    Question:
    Does anyone have any idea?
    I believe this should be document splitting settings which are not correctly.  Therefore, does anyone have working splitting method of these MIGO/MIRO function?
    Thanks in advance,
    sbmel

    Dear,
    Please check what is the splitting characteristics you have defined in
    SPRO>IMG> Financial Accounting (New)> General Ledger Accounting (New)> Business transaction>Document Splitting>Define Document Splitting Characteristics for General Ledger Accounting, check whether you have defined Proce Center and Segment as the characteristics or not.
    Br, Vivek

  • Reporting country on FB60 and MIRO for EU countries

    Hi,
    I am trying to post an Incoming Invoice  using FB60 or MIRO.
    Since the company code is defined as a EU country(Netherlands), the Reporting country and VAT registration number fields apear on the 'DETAILS' Tab on both MIRO and FB60.
    Once reporting country is entered, the VAT number gets selected from the Vendor Master.
    I have the following questions for which I need help:
    1. Is there a way to configure MIRO and FB60 so that the 'reporting country' is automatically selected and defaulted once I enter the Vendor Number? (similar to how the Payment terms gets defaulted from Vendor master).
    Currently, I have to enter the reporting country each time I enter an Invoice.
    2.If the Invoice is saved without entering the 'Reporting country', if I try to change the Invoice document, this field is not available for edit and so I cannot fill the Rptg country later. (The field appears in Document Header).
    Is there a way to handle this in FB60 and MIRO configuration so that the field 'reporting country' is available for change when we change document using Fb02? is there a seperate setting for this?
    Thanks,
    Uma Toraskar

    Hi Uma,
    did you find some solutions for your questions?
    Greetings, Vanessa

  • MIGO/MIRO Posting date to Display mode

    HI all,
    How can we set MIGO/MIRO Posting date field to Display mode.
    Can this be set for User specific.
    Please advise.Its Urgent.
    Regards,
    Jag

    hi
    for migo
    do following
    SPRO>MM>Inventory Mgmt/Physical Inventory-->Fields selection for goodsmovement Initial/Header Screens
    for miro
    U need to change the field selection for the posting keys used in MIRO.
    go to OB41, there for the posting key 31 u do the field selection.
    reward if useful
    regards
    kunal

  • CO-PA  FB60 vs MIRO

    Hi guys, we are posting third party invoices through FB60 and MIRO.  We need to make sure cost should flow to CO-PA.  Can some one explain advantages and disadvantages using FB60 or MIRO.  Is there white paper or documentation I can go and study so that we can submit our recommendations to customer.  Please help.

    HI
    Double invoice check for a vendor is possible for:
    1. Company Code
    2. Invoice Date
    3. Referece document
    If in config all of these are selected, and if you enter 2 invoices with all same values for above parameters, then system will throw an error.
    Amount is not checked for this and can you verify may be Reference given differently
    Thanks
    Vishnu

  • Problem with migo, miro

    Hi All,
    I am having a message when i do MIGO, MIRO as follow.
    Purchase order 4500017222 does not exist"
    But the above number is my purchase order i got  it when i created with PO wiht ME21N.
    I think tables r not updating . can any one give me the solution for the same.
    Thanku

    Hi
    Please check in the PO ta the header level whether a tab release strtergy exists.If so then go to transaction ME29N and release the PO.After going to transaction ME29N open the release stratergy tab in the header and release it and save the PO.Then try to do GR aganist this PO.
    Along with this,please check some other settings also,which may be also the reason due to which your GR is blocked
    Please check the delivery tab of PO.Check whether the GR check box is checked or not.If not checked,please check it.
    Just check you have created standard PO.If by mistake you have you have created a framework order then there will not be any GR.
    HOPE THIS WILL HELP YOU
    Reward if useful
    Thanks and Regards
    SHYAM.R

  • PO-MIGO-MIRO vs. PO-MIGO-F-90

    Hi,
    I did the following scenarios for purchasing & paying for an asset:
    > PO-MIGO-MIRO
    > PO-MIGO-F-90
    What is the difference between MIRO and F-90? I mean besides processing.
    How does F-90 affect purchasing docs, GR status, and reports?  Will the PO be cleared/closed?
    Thanks!

    When there is a  PO you need to use MIRO and not F-90
    The posting from the G/R from the PO is.
    GR
    70 Asset               100
    50 Gr/IR account            100
    Invoice MIRO
    50 Gr/IR account   100
    31  Vendor                      100
    When there is prices differences it will be posted normal on the asset
    What you then want to do with F-90? When there is a PO the invoice should always be posted with MIRO assigned to the PO! Other wise you have problems with your GR/IR account and the PO still expect an invoice!

  • MIGO/MIRO - possible? posting date accept only workdays

    Is possible to accept only workday dates in MIRO and MIGO for posting date?
    if any one knows please let me know how.
    thanks.

    Angelita,
    If that is the case, then the only way to achieve this would to be use an exit/BADI and do a validation on the posting date in the MIGO/MIRO header and display a warning/error message to the user as required.
    I think BADI MRM_HEADER_CHECK should work for the MIRO header validation. I am not too sure about MIGO - have an ABAPer check out BADI MB_MIGO_BADI.
    Hope this helps.
    H Narayan

  • Created batch material  and made po, migo,miro now change to non batch.

    Hi All.
    I have created Batch Material mm01 with  batch management check box.
    Created PO and donetransaction of  migo, miro.
    Now i want to change to non batch material.
    i like to remove batch management check box in mm02
    Regards.
    Parameshwar.
    Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Jul 7, 2011 9:23 PM

    Thanks Kunal.
    I will Click on display errors  for the list of open documents.
    Then i will clear all documents.
    Next I will change MM02 by removing Check box to normal material
    It should work for me.
    My Doubt is after this also i need to run the program to change to non batch material.
    Clarify me about program running.
    Regards.
    Parameshwar.
    Thanks MM dudes.

  • Create PO, MIGO,MIRO..Delete all Process.Very urgent..

    HI guru's
    Can anybody help me.. i have created PO, I have done MIGO,MIRO over. Some mistake i have done ,so i want delete all the things and I want to create new PO , MIGO & MIRO.
    Please help me step by step , how to delete all and creation of new..
    Thanks in advance
    sap-mm

    Hi
    If payment to vendor is not done u can reverse all posted document as follows
    Miro - MR8M
    MIGO - MBST
    Once these documents are cancelled change tax code in PO and again Post all documents as regular
    Note : If excise invoice is posted reverse the same also
    Vishal...

  • Future posting date in MIGO MIRO

    Hi,
    My client want that system should not allow future posting date than current system date in MIGO & MIRO.
    Ex. current system date: 30.12.2008
          then system should not allow posting date 31.12.2008.
    Please help how to do it.
    Regard's
    Parag lute

    Hi Parag
    To meet your client requirement, you need to change the message F5 192 from warning to Error.
    Since this message F5 192 is not a customised, ABAP need to change code.Contact ABAPer.
    Also you can check with OSS if they have any note for this requirement.
    Hope this anwers your query
    Prasad

Maybe you are looking for