FBVB not defined for direct call-up error

Hi All,
user are getting the message 'Transaction FBVB not defined for direct call-up' while running transaction FBVB .What does this mean.Even i am also getting the same error while running FBVB . Can somebody tell what does this error mean .
Thanks.
Chitta

Hey,
I hope you have got a reason for the message from sapfans & ittoolbox aswell.
Br,
sri

Similar Messages

FBVB error msg "Transaction not defined for direct call-up"

Dear Gurus,
Pls help me on issues below:-
1.)What is the diff between FBV0 and FBVB?
2.)When i try to initialize FBVB. I received an error "Transaction FBVB not defined for direct call-up. Can u teach me how to fix it up coz one of my end-user requested this T-code.
Thanks.

Nothing needs to be fixed - the transaction is called behind the scenes when the user uses FBV0 to post a parked document. Users should never call FBVB directly.
Andrew

Tax Jurisdiction Code not defined for procedure TAXSE

Hello,
We are facing any issue with the error "Tax Jurisdiction Code not defined for procedure TAXSE"
We are in mid of production bill run and this is getting very critical. Any pointers would be highly appreciated.
The company code country is SE (Sweden)
We have 2 BPs with address in California, US.
The Billing is successful for both the BPs.
While invoicing, one BP is successful.
The other is going in error "Tax Jurisdiction Code not defined for procedure TAXSE".
Error Details
Jurisdiction code not defined for procedure TAXSE
Message no. FF748
Diagnosis
You have entered a jurisdiction code in a country whose calculation procedure
does not allow the entry of jurisdiction codes.
System Response
Procedure
Check and, if necessary, correct the entry.
Procedure for System Administration
If it is not an input error, check and possibly change the system
settings.
To do this, choose Maintain entries (F5).
Change your calculation procedure so that tax calculation is carried out
using the jurisdiction code.
The BP and the CA setup is exact for both the cases.
Thanks

Hi
Go to the following SPRO config-
SAP Customizing Implementation Guide-->Financial Accounting-->Contract Accounts Receivable and Payable--->Basic Functions--->Contract Accounts--->Field Modifications--->Configure Field Attributes per Activity
Select Change and double-click on field grouping Jurisdiction code.
You will get the following screen.
You have to tick the option Changes plannable and then you will be able to remove jurisdiction code from CAA2
Hope it helps..
Thanks,
Amlan

Window RUEKOPF is not defined for form ZWESCHEINV3

Hi Guru,
I have encountered an issue whose possible resolution i am not able to meet.
The issue is like this :
While performing MIGO for the Return Delivery user is successfully getting the maerial document number . But when user trying to perfor /n or anyother transaction following message is appearing (Note: For Good Receipt user is not getting any message)
SAPoffice info.
Express document "Update was terminated" received from author "User_Name".
The detailed analysis of this error message done using SM13. which is showing there is some error occured in Function module RV_MESSAGE_UPDATE
30     RV_MESSAGE_UPDATE     V1     Error (no retry)
The Update Header (ctrlshftF8) Information of this error showing details like below :
Update key      37AD64DF8023F1F1AAB2001F29E3A344
Client          505
User            408020
Date            21.05.2010 Time       09:48:39
Language        EN
Account
Report          SAPLMIGO
Transaction     MIGO
Enqueue key     20100521094825425000001277sap705..........................
Context         :E:
Information     (53) = SYNC_VB, DONT_PROCESS_AGAIN, VB_WITH_ENQUEUE, VB_ENQUEUES_RELEASED,
UD Ret. Code    9
Status          Update was terminated
Update server   sap705_P03_77
UD Client       sap705_P03_77
Local time zone CET
Time Offset     1
Error details   Class:     TD         Number:    426
Window RUEKOPF is not defined for form ZWESCHEINV3
Report     LSTXCU03             Row        101
Here i am getting error information for that particular function module that Window RUEKOPF is not defined for form ZWESCHEINV3.
Error details   Class:     TD         Number:    426
Window RUEKOPF is not defined for form ZWESCHEINV3
Report     LSTXCU03             Row        101
The single test (ctrlshftF9) in Sm13 of that particular function module shows the following error message
Window RUEKOPF is not defined for form ZWESCHEINV3
After going through the help text of the above error message I have found following
Diagnosis
The specified window is not defined in the form
I have checked the form ZWESCHEINV3 in SE71. The window RUEKOPF is present over there.
So what might be the reason for getting this error and what approach we should take to resolve this.
Thanks & regards
Saifur Rahaman

Hi,
I have gone through the OSS note you have provided.. There i can able to find that This is for error message whose TD = 427
Symptom
When you print a collective slip for areturn delivery, the update
terminates in function module RV_MESSAGE_UPDATE. *The error message is TD*
*427.*
But if you check my case
Error details   Class:     TD         Number:    426
So I would like to know how far this ossnote will helpout to resolve issue like my case
Thanks & regards
Saifur Rahaman

Special G/L transactions not defined for bills/exch.and down pmnts ERROR

Dear Experts,
I am trying to park document via F-63 - Invoice Parking - General to park down payments made to vendor using following details in initial screen for F-63:
Posting Key_____29
Account number _1000
SGL Ind ________A
after pressing enter key the system prompt error message that is:
Special G/L transactions not defined for bills/exch.and down pmnts
Message no. FP030
Diagnosis
You have selected a posting key with a special G/L indicator of type 'Bill of exchange', or 'Down payment'. Document parking is not defined for special G/L transactions of the type 'Bill of exchange' or 'Down payment'.
System Response
Document parking cannot be carried out.
Procedure
Select a different posting key or special G/L indicator. If the posting is a 'One-time posting' to a rent contract, select a different transaction type or post the document directly.
HOW CAN I PARK DOWN PAYMENT DOCUMENT FOR VENDOR. KINDLY PROVIDE SUITABLE SOLUTION.
REGARDS

Dear,
Your special G/L "A" is set as Down Payment/Down Payment request, this is what cause the error.
To meet your requirement just go to FBKP select special G/L "A" enter your chart of accounts and go into properties, change
Special G/L transaction types to Others from Payment/Down payment request.
Advances can be created as Special G/L transaction types Others
If parking is utmost required by you then according to me you should create two special G/L for Down Payment. New created should be used for parking and default by SAP you can use with functionality like F-47, F-48, F-54.
System is stopping you because down payment functionality is provided exhaustively in SAP so you should follow that.
Please analyze the process exhaustively and implement to smoothen your process.
Regards,
Chintan Joshi.

Error : Excise modvat accounts not defined for GRPO transaction and U1 exci

I have Created Impot PO, After Planned Delivery cost MIRO I am trying to Perform GR then its giving Error "Excise modvat accounts not defined for GRPO transaction and U1 excise group
Message no. 8I402"
I have already maintained GL account in "Specify G/L Accounts per Excise Transaction" for Excise group U1
This problem is coming when Additional Duty on custom condition type JADC is maintained in "Maintain Excise Defaults" node in the column "ADC Cond" . If I remove JADC condition type from this place the this error is not coming but AED column is not fetching any value while doing GR.
Please help me in this issue , still No answer
Edited by: shiwanshu singh on Jan 28, 2009 10:26 AM

Dear sir
For GRPO have you maintained sub transaction Type IP for your excise group U1. If you not maintained pl maintain . and assign G/L account to modvat clearing account , the G/l account should be same as company code CVD account.
Regards
jrp

ERROR in MIRO : An exchange rate type is not defined for country IN

Experts:
When I try to enter the invoice received from the vendor, I am getting the following message.
An exchange rate type is not defined for country IN
Message no. FF802
Can anyone provide me a solution for this?
Thanks,
Vijai

This is the explanation given in note 974619 for the above error message
Summary
Symptom
When you post an FI document, the system issues error message FF 801 or FF 802.
Other terms
Plants abroad, FF 801, FF802
Reason and Prerequisites
You use the 'Plants abroad' function.
See Note 882132 for more information about this.
Solution
If the 'Plants abroad' function is active, additional fields appear when you maintain the country global parameters (transaction OY01, table T005):
- Country currency       (Field WAERS)
- Exchange rate type     (Field KURST)
- Net discount base      (Field XSKFN)
- Net tax base           (Field XMWSN)
You must maintain the fields 'Country currency' and 'Exchange rate type'.
Otherwise, the system issues error message FF 801 or FF 802.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Error - Excise modvat accounts not defined for DLFC transaction and 01 exci

Dear All,
Getting below error while doing J1IIN - Posting Excise invoice for Sale.
"Excise modvat accounts not defined for DLFC transaction and 01 excise group"
I checked with the settings GL are assigned to for DLFC and 01 excise group.
Is anywhere else I need to mantain the modvat GL
Regards,
Rakesh

Check if you are using any subtransaction type along with excise transaction type.
Excise group, ETT, company code, sub transaction type (if any), Chart of account, Modvat account (pls maintain all the entries over here) search for modavat clearing field and maintain it.
BR
Edited by: Sujoy on Jan 15, 2010 9:45 AM

While creating sales order got error version "0" is not defined for company

Hi,
i got a error while creating a sales order(va01) ,i got an error
saying that "version 0(zero) is not defined for company code
if there is any solution please provide....
Thanks&regards
kishore kumar

Go to TCODE:OKEQ
1)select version 0 here and ext select settings for each fiscal year under controlling area settings
2)give your controlling area XXXX and version 0 then enter
3)select new entries maintain data for new year 2008.
Hope this will give u
Sri

Error message TD427 (A text element is not defined for form J_1IEWT_CERT)

Hello,
Q> I assign the SAP script form J_1IEWT_CERT to 'SPRO=>Withholding Tax Certificates for Vendor and Customers' and was trying to see the print preveiw. But once I press printpreview button error comes "ELEMENT TITLEDET WINDOW TITLEDET IS NOT DEFINED FOR FORM J_1IEWT_CERT" and i can't see the printprview.
Same thing I tried with the copy of J_1IEWT_CERT from 000 client to ZJ_1IEWT_CERT; but same error is coming.
If i try the printpreview through SE71 it shows without error.
Thank You.

"test printing" via SE71 only prints what exists in the form. Here your form is missing TITLEDET window and element.
The print program tries to print TITLEDET but it does not exist. Could you check SAP notes to get correct versions of print program and sapscript form.

Error while creating PO -- Unit of measure not defined for lanuage ZH

Hi all,
i have created the PR with EA as UOM. Then while creating PO, i am getting error like
' Unit of measure not defined for lanuage ZH' .
Then I execute CUNI
Then menu is GOTO > Translation > units of measure
enter source language and target language . After this i am getting the below message
---> Language not available on server
Please suggest what i should do. Thanks.
Thanks
pabi

HI Pabi,
Go to material master for material in purchase requisition, the Go to Additional data and maintained language as ZH in material master data.
Also the other possibility, that if in your case purchase requisition are converted to purchase orders through background jobs,
then check the background job execution in SM37 whether that background job has been triggered twice parellely in the background, which could have resulted in locking of same purchase requisition at same time and hence your are getting the Error.
Br,
Tushar

Error saying 'Posting period 000 is not defined for fiscal year variant K4'

Hi All,
   When I try to add a new entry in the transaction OB52, I get an error message saying 'Posting period 000 is not defined for fiscal year variant K4'. The entry that I add is,
Variant           : 0001
Account Type: +
From Period    : 1
Year               : 1995
To Period        : 12
Year               : 2010
From Period2 : 13
Year               : 2000
To period2      : 16
Year               : 2010
Please let me know what customising needs to be done to solve this issue.
Thanks a ton.
Best Regards,
Jeff

Hi,
Hava you checked in OB52 screen, by default 0001 posting period variant will be there for +, A, D, K, S account types.
If it is already existed in your OB52 screen, you won't create one more record with the same name. You have to edit the existing 0001 posting period with new values.
Thanks
Chandra

Error: "posting period is not defined for fiscal year variant" in FBICS3

Hi,
I got error "posting period is not defined for fiscal year variant" when I execute t code FBICS3.
I checked in OB29 & t code FBIC010 & noted that the fiscal year variant had ben maintained.
Please advice.

HI,
It was noted that the mentioned t code had been maintain but below mentioned error appear:
Posting period is not defined for fiscal year variant
Message no. GU506
Diagnosis
You have tried to determine a posting date in fiscal year variant for period , fiscal year , but this period is not defined for the variant.
Procedure
You maintain fiscal year variants in table T009.
It was referring to t code OB29. I have checked the detail, in OB29 also details maintain.
Please advice why the error still prompt.

Error as unit of measure PC not defined for language RO while creation ofPO

Hi GUYS,
When am trying to create a PO in ME21N transaction i got error as below,
unit of measure PC not defined for language RU
Message no. 06079
Table 006A contains no entry for this unit of measure
Please let me know what action to be taken from my side to over come this issue.
Note: If i check the related vendor i could able to view that the language maintained as RU.
Cheers,
Kumar.S

Hi Jurgen,
Thanks for your reply once again.
As mentioned by you earlier i have tried to login with languae RU in Q system but unfortunately i got an error saying taht language not installed.
Also we found for Language - EN and UOM - PC has been maintianed in T006A table.But if i check for lanugage - RU and UOM PC combinatoin has not manintaned in T006A table.
Please let me know how to maintain the values in this table T006A for combination Lang - RU and UOM - PC.
Please revert back with your soilution.
Note: I have tried in SM30 but failed due to below error
The maintenance dialog for T006A is incomplete or not defined
Cheers,
Kumar.S

Goods Issue error - batches not defined for delivery item

Hi,
We are getting a Goods Issue error u201CThe batches are not defined for delivery item 000010u201D.   We are only getting this error for a material that is being shipped against a particular third party sales scheduling agreement. We went live in 2007 and we had no issues, but when we had to create a new Sched Agreement this year, for third party sales, we started to get this error. However, if we re-activate the old scheduling agreement we do not get the error. We have a batch job that executes the following steps:
1.     VL06IG (collective goods receipt)
2.     VL10 (collective delivery)
3.     VL06O (collective GI)
We have compared the 2 scheduling agreements and see no difference. We are assuming it has something to do with how the scheduling agreement was setup, but are not sure. Any suggestions on how to correct this problem would be much appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Helen

Dear Murali,
The material has not changed at all. I'm not sure what you mean by maintaining batches while receipt of the material.
If I re-open the old scheduling agreement, we do not get the error message. However, as soon as we use the new SD scheduling agreement, we get the error. We are using the same material master on both scheduling agreements.
Thanks,
Helen

FBVB not defined for direct call-up error

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for