FBZP different Max limit and amout limit in bank determination

HI:
FBZP there is "Maximum limit" in company code level/payment method
what is differnt with "Amount limit" / Availble for outgoing payment in Bank determination.
I have try to create invoice with payment method which exceed max limit at company code or at bank determination, but system still select my invoice to process.

Hi Mandy,
Maximum amount at the level of Co. Code/Pmt method means, that system at the time of creating payment documents will not pick up any payment which exceeds this amount.
For example, you you have a payment method "Cheque" and the organization wants to set up a maximum limit for the cheque payment, then you can specify maximum amount here and F110 will not issue any cheque exceeding this amount.
Available amounts is maintained at the Bank account level( I have explained this in a previous thread you had raised)
So, in short, you can say, maximum amount is for a single payment document that is created and available amount is the amount that is available to make all the payments from the proposal list.
For your testing : Check whether the Payment method is specified at the item level in your posted document, if yes, remove it and try again. If you read SAP help on this field it says -
" Items in which the Payment method has already been specified are excluded from this.In these cases, the payment method specified is also valid if the maximum amount is exceeded"
Regards,
Kavita

Similar Messages

780 SLI - "Voltage Limit" and "Utilization Limit" Flags

Hello,
I'm trying to pinpoint an issue I'm having with my video cards, and wanted additional advice before I make purchases. My questions will be: is there anything else I should try? Is there anything I can do to pinpoint the problem?
My setup:
Core i7-950 - OC'd to 3.84 ghz
ASUS P6X58D-E - mobo
2x MSI n780 TF in SLI
Corsair 850AX Power Supply
Also drawing power: 5x Hard Drives; Typically only 2 are running at one time (OS RAID), the other 2 are a backup RAID I only use to archive stuff, and the last is a Linux drive that Windows doesn't even see
Issue:
Most games run without issue; but Metro Last Light is unstable. I run at 1920x1080, Advanced Physx, 2x AA, Very High quality and Very High Tessalation. There are times when I get 60 FPS (V-Sync); however, there are times that the performance drops to 6 or 14 FPS. When it is at 14 FPS it is still playable, but 6 FPS is terrible. I use Afterburner's OSD to monitor GPU Usage, Temp, and FPS. When it is at 6 FPS, it is only using 12% of either GPU at most.
While investigating, I noticed a few things in Afterburner that stand out when this occurs.
1) The Core Clock drops down (throttling?)
2) The "Voltage Limit" and "Utilization Limit" flags are both set on both GPUs.
My thoughts:
I'm thinking that my Power Supply isn't quite big enough. I thought this may become an issue when I first bought the two cards (I was previously running 2 460's on SLI, then upgraded to 780s).
My question is if the video cards are pulling the power supply's limit - will this trip the two flags? I would have thought the Voltage Limit would indicate the voltage going too high; but power supply being strained should drop voltage.
I have not changed any of the voltage settings to the card - they are whatever MSI has them set to for the stock OC.
If I buy another PSU, I don't like to go cheap - so it will definitely be beefy. Before I drop a few hundred on it, I want to be sure the Power Supply is the issue. Is there anything else you guys/gals can think of that may be an issue? Any tests I can do to confirm?
The new Thief seems to run fine; also Kombustor runs without issue (but only runs on one GPU - does not SLI). I have no other stability issues - the PC doesn't randomly shut down or reboot. It just seems to be Metro Last Light - but Metro is also the most demanding game that I own.
Any assistance or feedback will be greatly appreciated!
Edit - Update:
I tried disabling SLI to see if the issue would improve by only loading 1 GPU. No difference at all - no better or worse. Same flag (just only on the one GPU), same exact FPS 6.4.
I installed GPU-Z to be able to monitor core voltage. It normally runs at about 1.1 volts. However, once the issue occurs it is as low as 0.875 volts. Seems to confirm the PSU may be an issue. Any feedback or additional confirmation is still greatly appreciated!

Apologize for the bump - I could not see a way to edit the original post. However, I wanted to make sure this information is available in case others had similar issues.
I found an even better solution. NVIDIA has an updated "Physx" driver - you have to download it from the NVIDIA site (i.e. Other NVIDIA drivers, not GeForce). Look for Physx version 9.13.1220 or later. 9.13.1220 was release on 1/27/2014 - but an older version is included in the most recent GeForce drivers for some reason.
The patch notes from Physx 9.13.1220 specifically state:
*Changes & fixed issues in this release
**Fixes a bug that caused the Metro Last Light to not be GPU accelerated on some systems.
With this software update I can enable Advanced Physx and max settings in Last Light and still run at 60 FPS.

Lower specific limit and upper limit

Hi, we are entering the lower specific limit and upper limit as 100 and 200 in qp02 screen for certain MIC. The table name mentioned as QFLTP, which is a structure. I want to know in which table this values were saved?

Dear Yadav
Use PLMK or QAMV if you want to get the specification from the lot. In this the values will be E which can be interpreted
for eg 5,5000000000000000E+01 means 55
9,0000000000000002E-01 = .9
Regards
Gajesh

What is the significance of Safety Upper Limit and Lower Limit

Hello Experts,
I was trying to create a generic datasouce in rso2 , while setting the delta specific field I have selected date field and I need to know the significance of other two input fields provided over there:
Safety Interval Upper Limit.
Safety Interval Lower Limit.
and check box Real Time Enable.
Thanks,
Vijay

Hi Vijay
Safety Interval Upper Limit of Delta Selection This field is used by DataSources that determine their delta generically using a repetitively-increasing field in the extract structure. The field contains the discrepancy between the current maximum when the delta or delta init extraction took place and the data that has actually been read. Leaving the value blank increases the risk that the system could not extract records arising during extraction. Example: A time stamp is used to determine the delta. The time stamp that was last read is 12:00:00. The next delta extraction begins at 12:30:00. In this case, the selection interval is 12:00:00 to 12:30:00. At the end of extraction, the pointer is set to 12:30:00. A record - for example, a document- is created at 12:25 but not saved until 12:35. It is not contained in the extracted data but, because of its time stamp, is not extracted the next time either. For this reason, the safety margin between read and transferred data must always be larger than the maximum length of time that it takes to create a record for this DataSource (with a time stamp delta), or it must display an interval that is sufficiently large (for determining delta using a serial number). Safety Interval Lower Limit This field contains the value taken from the highest value of the previous delta extraction to determine the lowest value of the time stamp for the next delta extraction. For example: A time stamp is used to determine a delta. The extracted data is master data: The system only transfers after-images that overwrite the status in the BW. Therefore, a record can be extracted into the BW for such data without any problems. Taking this into account, the current time stamp can always be used as the upper limit when extracting: The lower limit of the next extraction is not seamlessly joined to the upper limit of the last extraction. Instead, its value is the same as this upper limit minus a safety margin. This safety margin needs to be big enough to contain all values in the extraction which already had a time stamp when the last extraction was carried out but which were not read. Not surprisingly, records can be transferred twice. However, for the reasons above, this is unavoidable. these are used to determining the delta in a datasource: 1. Time stamp - The field is a DEC15 field which always contains the time stamp of the last change to a record in the local time format. 2. Calendar day - The field is a DATS8 field which always contains the day of the last change. 3. Numerical pointer - The field contains another numerical pointer that appears with each new record .
also dwload this How to Generic Delta doc https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/84bf4d68-0601-0010-13b5-b062adbb3e33
2.
You can determine the upper limit of the time. To do this, you specify a time period relative to the current date. The time unit for the time period can be specified in days, weeks, months, quarters, years, posting periods, or fiscal years.
The upper limit can also be rounded down to the end of a time period by selecting another, additional time unit, so that, for example, only complete months or years can be archived when a date field is selected as a selection characteristic for the time slice. The time slice defined in this way contains the complete time period before the upper limit calculated.
1. If delta field is Date (Record Create Date or change date), then use Upper Limit of 1 day.
This will load Delta in BW as of yesterday. Leave Lower limit blank.
2. If delta field is Time Stamp, then use Upper Limit of equal to 1800 Seconds (30 minutes).
This will load Delta in BW as of 30 minutes old. Leave Lower limit blank.
3. If delta field is a Numeric Pointer i.e. generated record # like in GLPCA table, then use
Lower Limit. Use count 10-100. Leave upper limit blank. If value 10 is used then last 10
records will be loaded again. If a record is created when load was running, those records
may get lost. To prevent this situation, lower limit can be used to backup the starting
sequence number. This may result in some records being processed more than once;
therefore, be sure this DataSources is only feeding an ODS Object
Hope this will help you
Thanks & Regards
Kiran

Spend Limit and Approval limit data w.r.t Employee

Hello,
Below is the requirement:
I wanted to build a report in BI which will provide the Spend Limit, Approval limit and Approver Data w.r.t an Employee from SRM system.
Please advice how can I get these details? Is there any Function module or table where in I can get these details?
Please help.
Many Thanks.

Hello,
Below is the requirement:
I wanted to build a report in BI which will provide the Spend Limit, Approval limit and Approver Data w.r.t an Employee from SRM system.
Please advice how can I get these details? Is there any Function module or table where in I can get these details?
Please help.
Many Thanks.

How to maintain minimum price limit and maximum price limit for a condition

Hello Gurus,
Goodmorning,
How to set minimum price limit and maximum price limit for a pricing condition type where we will do this ?, is it possible to set in VK11 ?
Note- I can see minimum and maximum setting in condition type pricing - in SPRO but not seen anything in VK11 condition record maintaince . so how to maintain in condition record( VK11-Minimum limit price and Max limit price )
Looking for your inputs
Thanks in advance
Regards
Venkat

hi,
in VK12
select the condition record - goto blue ladder icon
there you can maintain scales
like lower limit and upper limit.
balajia

Expected Value and Overall limit value usage.

Hi Sap Gurus,
if the frame work order we have these 2 field Expected value and overall limit field value to be filled,
and the system allows Invoice (or GR) up to the maximum of the overall limit value. and only if the value entered crosses the overall limit value the system issues a Error Message ( which is agreeable)
but the logical requirement is that, if the value crosses the Expected value limit the system should display a warning message, indicating that the value has crossed the expected value.
is there any config or note to be applied to get this funtionality.
Thanks and regards
Priya S

Hi,
Please refer to the Online documentation:
         Material Management
         -> External Services Management
            -> Procurement of Services: Processes
               -> Accelerated and Simplified Processes
                  -> Use of Value Limits (for Unplanned Services)
Inside this documentation, it is stated that there is a variety of
limits (combinations) to be used:-
- Overall limit only
- Overall limit and limit on services covered by contract item(s)
- Overall limit, limit on services covered by contract item(s),
- and other limit
- Overall limit and other limit
- Overall limit on services from model specifications or standard
    service catalog
- Expected value
The expected value is used in the update of the
PO item value and this is the value used in the release strategy.
Here is the f1 help:
Expected value - ESUH-COMMITMENT
Value that the unplanned services (or the materials) covered by this
item are not expected to exceed.
Use
If you are working with the release (approval) procedure for purchasing
documents, this value serves as the basis for a release strategy applied
to this document.
If you tick 'No limit',you don't need to enter 'Overall limit',but must
enter 'Expected value'.Because 'Expected value' will affect the release
strategy. Please read the note 440601 connected to this.
Concerning the variability of actual cost of a purchase order,
expected value means that the unplanned services (or materials)
covered by this item are not EXPECTED to exceed.
It is not mandatory that it has the same value like total limit value.
Expected value can exceed, it is used for comparison with total limit
value in cost control.
Expected value can also be combined with unlimited total limit in a
purchasing document.
Regards,
Edit

Credit and Comittment Limit

Hi,
What is the difference between credit limit and comittment limit?

Hello vasanthi,
CREDIT LIMIT
This is the amount of credit allowed/extended to the Business Partner.
The remaining credit is calculated as:
Remaining Credit = Credit Limit - Account Balance
COMMITMENT LIMIT:
This is the 'Credit Limit' plus undeposited cheques and predated cheques
which have already been deposited, but their payment date has not yet
been reached.
The remaining commitment is calculated as:
Remaining Credit = Credit Limit - [Account Balance + Undeposited
Collections + Deposited (Predated) Cheques]
The 'Account Balance' is typically based on the invoiced transactions
from the 'Account Balance' field of the Business Partner Master Data. To
include the delivered transactions in the 'Account Balance' computation,
tick the 'Consider Deliveries Balance' option in the General Settings ->
BP tab of the Administration module.
Cheques and cash from 'Incoming Payment' are 'deposited' in the system
using the 'Deposit' function of the Banking module.
Regards,
Wilma Wang
SAP Business One Forums team

Free limit (overall limit vs free limit)

Hello,
I would have a question regarding item category D (service) in Purchase Order.
For such items, a tab "Limits" is displayed, In this tab, there is a field "Overall limit" but also a nested tab called "Other limit" with a field "Limit" (corresponds to free limit in the help)
Help gives me this message :
Overall limit --> Maximum value that the total of all unplanned services (or the value of the material) covered by this document item may not exceed.
Free limit --> Maximum value which an unplanned service may not exceed.
I don't understand the difference between those 2 fields. When I use ML81N, I can not create an item whose the value exceed one of this field.
Example given :
Overall limit = 5000u20AC
Free limit = 1000u20AC
In ML81N, if I create a SES with gross price = 1001u20AC, I get message No limit for unplanned services amounting to 2.501,00 exists
Other example :
Overall limit = 5000u20AC
Free limit = 10000u20AC
In ML81N, if I create a SES with gross price = 5001u20AC, I get message No overall limit of 5.001,00 for unplanned services exists
So I am blocked as soon as 1 of the limit in reached.
Does anyone could explain the difference between those 2 fields?
Thanks for your help,
Patrick

Please refer to the Online documentation: Material Management -> External Services Management -> Procurement of Services: Processes -> Accelerated and Simplified Processes -> Use of Value Limits (for Unplanned Services) Inside this documentation, it is stated that there is a variety of limits (combinations) to be used:- - Overall limit only - Overall limit and limit on services covered by contract item(s) - Overall limit, limit on services covered by contract item(s), - and other limit - Overall limit and other limit - Overall limit on services from model specifications or standard service catalog - Expected value The expected value is used in the update of the PO item value and this is the value used in the release strategy. Here is the f1 help: Expected value - ESUH-COMMITMENT Value that the unplanned services (or the materials) covered by this item are not expected to exceed. Use If you are working with the release (approval) procedure for purchasing documents, this value serves as the basis for a release strategy applied to this document. If you tick 'No limit',you don't need to enter 'Overall limit',but must enter 'Expected value'.Because 'Expected value' will affect the release strategy. Please read the note 440601 connected to this. Concerning the variability of actual cost of a purchase order, expected value means that the unplanned services (or materials) covered by this item are not EXPECTED to exceed. It is not mandatory that it has the same value like total limit value. Expected value can exceed, it is used for comparison with total limit value in cost control. Expected value can also be combined with unlimited total limit in a purchasing document

Credit Limit and Balance dispalying on different lines

HI Gurus,
I have 0FI_AR_4 populating AR line items DSO, cube and on top of it is a multiprovider
I have 0FI_AR_9 populating a DSO, cube and is included in the same multiprovider as above.
Now when I am loading data and running the report I see companycode,netduedate,customer,balance on a dirrent row and for the same customer I see another line with customer,creditlimit data
How can I get all in to one row
In both my DSOs 0Customer is one of the key fields
I have read someposts on the forum and some suggest to lookup companycode and load the customer and credit limt based on companycode by creating a new Zinfoobject in the cube based on the 0FI_AR_9 DSO.
Is there any other solution?
If that is the only solution then please suggest the steps to implement this process along with the ABAP code.where to write the code and what to write.
I am not good at ABAP.
Thanks for all your help!
Thanks
Madhu

For credit limit data,
create a master data info object for Customer compounded with Credit Control Area and attribute should be credit limit.
(ii) create transformation from DSO based on 0FI_AR_9 to this master data info object so that data can be loaded for Credit Limit value.
(ii) This info object should be added to cube based on 0FI_AR_4 and map Customer and Credit Control Area to Customer and Credit Contrl Area coming from DSO for 0FI_AR_4.
(iii) you can remove the other cube from info provider
(iv) create a formula variable in query designer to read the master data attribute - Credit Limit
(v) use this formual variable in a CKf and diplay it in report
This way you can show the balance and credit limit for a customer in single row.
Regards,
Gaurav

No redirection to different url upon http connections limit exceeded

Hi,
As of Standalone OC4j 10.1.2, if you want messages to be redirected to a different URL when the maximum connections limit is reached, you would include the HTTP redirect URL to max-http-connections tag inside server.xml.
<max-http-connections max-connections-queue-timeout="120" socket-backlog="50"
value="100">http://optional.redirect.url/page.jsp</max-http-connections>
I have a standalone OC4j 10.1.3, and would like to be able to redirect to different URL when maximum connections limit is reached but the above max-http-connections does not work and I am not redirected to different URL when maximum connectionns limit is reached. I read user guide of OC4j 10.1.3 and there is no mentioning of max-http-connections at all. In there, they talk about limiting concurrency via http thread pool but there is no discussion as to the mechanism of redirecting users to a different URL where I can display a user friendly message to say "Server is busy, please try again later..." instead of browser display a message "Page cannot be displayed"..
Please advice,
Thanks

Any thoughts on above issue ? please help.
thanks
Sam

SC with combination of Limit and account assignment category as unknown(U)

Hi,
We are at SRM 5.5, Please let me know is it possible to create SC with combination of Limit and account assignment category as unknown(U) then PO with same combination and distrribution of cost to different cost centers at the time of confirmation from SRM side.
Please guide me processs of the same in steps
Many Thanks,
Venkat

It is for Extended Classic scenario

Mis match in attributes of item category B-limit and PO item details

Hi
I could not able to create a Blanket PO with document type FO and item category B (limit).
Normally for a blanket PO, GR is not allowed and IR is mandatory. So, I could able to see these checkboxes for GR (not set and grayed) and IR (set and grayed) in the item details of the PO in delivery and invoice tabs. But I end with an error message that 'GR is not set is used is not allowed' (exactly i don't remember but some thing like that)
Before creating a blanket PO, I found that in 'attributes of item categories', that for the item category B, GR is set and IR is not set (in customizing-OMH4). Of course, one cannot change the attributes of item categories.
I suppose due to this mis-match in the attributes of item categories and that in the PO, I'm getting an error message while creating a blanket PO and could not able to save.
Also I have checked all the system messages for the message displayed. No where(i.e. in any message class or category and for that message number) I found any such message defined with error in 'attributes of system messages' for purchasing, material master, inventory, invoice verification etc.
I suppose this error message is coming somewhere from the application program for the PO.
So, what can be the solution
waiting for your reply.
thank you
Message was edited by:
srinivas vandana

Thank you for your answer. I haven't mention this point in my thread but I have already tried this.
I have tried matching the GR and IR controls of account assignment category with PO GR, IR controls and also with item category B, GR, IR controls. Still i am getting the same error and could not able to save the PO
Also I have checked the field settings for PO for all categories like transaction relevant, item category relevant, etc in customizing.
Main problem is both GR and IR controls are being grayed in PO. Other wise I could able to change them as per my wish and could able to avoid the error even though the GR and IR controls in PO are correct as per the process requirement.
If possible, please check the GR and IR controls for item category B (in my system it showing that GR is set with binding and IR is not set with binding). But it should be reverse as per the process requirements and in limit PO it is showing correctly. i.e. with GR is not set with binding and IR is set with binding.
thank you

I did not authorize 2 in app purchases and because my credit card is at its limit, and i dont know how to reverse the in app purchases, i cannot update any app or do just about anything in the appstore or itunes store. I paid for apps, i demand my updates

I did not authorize 2 in app purchases and because my credit card is at its limit, and i dont know how to reverse the in app purchases, i cannot update any app or do just about anything in the appstore or itunes store. I dont care if i owe apple's itunes appstore a few dollars over 2 in app purchases i never meant to download in fact the whole app itself i wanted to delete...but out of the hundreds (maybe lower thousands) fof dollars in music and apps and whatever else, that i rightfully purchased over the passed couple of years....should *NOT* have the upgrades and/or previous purchased songs withheld from me over $3 in accidently purchased add ons through an existing app i deleted an disliked anyway

Same thing happened to me with my peruvian credit card in the peruvian app store, I want to buy an app, but it says that my credit card is "not supported in the Peruvian app store"

PR with combination of item category B = limit, and account assignment : F

Hi,
Is it possible to create a blanket purchase order/framework requisition with combination item category B = limit, and account assignment : F ?
Thanks in advance.
Sachin
Edited by: Sachin on Sep 20, 2011 12:05 PM

Hi A.Purihella / Raj,
Thanks for your reply
I have maintained the B and F combination in the customization.
But when I am creating the PR using item category B with account assignment F (order) and after pressing enter, this account assignment F vanished from the PR and that field also turns in to gray mode. So system is not allowing to use u2018Fu2019 with B item category.
Have you used or tested this scenario of using combination item category B with account assignment F (order) in PR and PO.
Best Regards,
Sachin

FBZP different Max limit and amout limit in bank determination

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for