FCC parameter in IDoc to File scenario

Hi,
We have configured FCC parameter to get the comma separated flat file. File is getting created but I want header line in the file which is not getting created. Can any please suggest on the same?
Target DT structure is as below:
Inside root node FileName_Values is used for variable substitution in target File Name and these fields should not be present in file content.
Second node inside root node is having actual structure of file.
FCC configuration is as below:
Thanks,
Vertika

Hello,
>>Please see the screen shot it doesn't any thing about occurrence.
Duplicate Subtree option will make sure that whatever is the cardinality of Main node (i.e Oildex_File node) will be passed on to the duplicated node as well.
So don't have to worry about that.
>>If I am mapping constant value in first node which is the original node and actual line items in second node I am not sure what will happen in case of more that 1 line item.
Answered above.
If there are more then 1 source line items and if u have mapped source line item to that duplicated target node, then as many occurrences of target node will be created as present in the source item - so treat duplicate node as any other node having multiple cardinality.
>>Can you please use full word instead of using acronyms? I am confused what exactly you said in your last post.
I thought i have written a straight forward reply and used so called acronyms only for simple PI words like Operation mapping, meessage type, occ, ur Message type name...
Anyway, in my previous reply i was proposing u another approach where i was suggesting to create one more mapping between ur target structure only i.e. MT_Oildex_Invoice.
So with the second approach, you don't have to change anything in your existing mapping.
Create one more 1 to 1 mapping between your target structure only (and while doing mapping change the occurrence of message type so that multimapping tags gets added automatically) and then u can use duplicate subtree option on "oildex_File" node on the target side.
So while doing mapping just repeat the same process which i have explained you above for first occurrence of oildex_File node (i mean just map constant values in the first occ of oildex node) and for the second occurrence of "oildex_File" node just do 1 to 1 mapping (map second occurrence of oildex_file node in target side to the source "oildex_File" node)
Let me say it again, ur second mapping will be between MT_oildex_Invoice TO MT_oildex_Invoice
once done, add ur second mapping under Operation Mapping and then check if you are getting constant values before the actual values or not?
Thanks
Amit Srivastava

Similar Messages

FCC in receiver side in idoc to file scenario

Hi all,
           I am doing an idoc to file scenario using FCC .I am using FCC in receiver side ,but i am getting my output file in only one line while i want structre to be seprated by new line.for more information i am giving muy file structre.
Record
    header(1to1)
    data    (0 to unbounded)
    footer (1to 1)          header, data, footer are three structre which contain various fields.I have to use fieldFixedLengths as filed separator. I am also using endseperator as 'nl' but its not coming in new line.Please share ur views on this issue.
Regards
Neha

hi neha,
In your scenario
Recordset Structure header,data,footer
header.fieldFixedLengths    = 1,2,3, whatever it is
data.fieldFixedLengths      = similar to header
footer.fieldFixedLengths    = similar to header
header.endSeparator = 'nl'
data.endSeparator = 'nl'
footer.endSeparator = 'nl'
I guess you dont have to do any thing else.
Regards
Pushkar
Message was edited by:
        Pushkar Anand

Why we dont need sender agreement and comm channel in IDOC to file scenario

Hi,
there are 2 queries:
first query :
Scenario is "Idoc to file transfer"
why we dont need sender agreement and communication channel for IDOC to file ,while we do need
both of these for "File to RFC "
Answer : which i got is because IDOC sits at ABAP stack but same is valid for RFC also.
Then why For "IDOC to file" we dont need that.
Second query:
Also when i did scenario for File1-RFC-File2 scenario using BPM i have created a interface
between XI-RFC synchronous to send data which we got from file1 in XI to RFC importing parameter
and getting data from RFC back to File2.
Here in IDOC to file scenario why we dont need any interfface for IDOC-XI Asynchronous.
Regards,
Mayank
Edited by: mayank verdia on Jan 13, 2009 11:49 AM
Edited by: mayank verdia on Jan 13, 2009 11:50 AM

Dear All,
For file to idoc scenario is there any possibility to get line items details or xml details i.e the segments and its related field details using reference id, transaction id or interface name or message id in SAP PI 7.0. I know we need to click each and every message in sxi_monitor and look for details.
For SAP(R3 System) I can create a report and set the job for specific time period so automatically it throws the details(like reference no, document date, invoice no from) in ftp path as .csv file. The same ftp path is maintained in program.
I wanted to check FTP--->PI postings and I have set the job at r3 system it is working fine and Im monitoring it too.
Now the end to end scenario is FTP--->PI--->ECC(R3 system). Please help.Many Thanks.

Doubt in idoc 2 file scenario

Hi,
I want to create idoc 2 file scenario with out any Transformation.
In that case how/what to create Data type for receiver.
I want to receive the same idoc in the receiver folder/Directory (like XML file) with out any transformation.
Thanks
Ruban

Hi,
For this scenario you need to create the Data type structures as similar to IDOC type and just have to transfer to file without FCC.
It will transfer the IDOC data as it is in XML format
refer
/people/prateek.shah/blog/2005/06/08/introduction-to-idoc-xi-file-scenario-and-complete-walk-through-for-starters - IDoc to File
/people/venugopalarao.immadisetty/blog/2007/01/24/troubleshooting-file-to-idoc-scenario-in-xi
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/xi/error%2bhandling%2bin%2bfile-idoc%2bscenario
(Just avoid using FCC conversions on receiver file adapter in above scenarios)
Thanks
Swarup
Edited by: Swarup Sawant on Mar 24, 2008 6:15 PM

Real time idoc to file scenario - URGENT!

Hi all,
I have a real time idoc to file scenario with the idoc structure as below:
WP_PLU03
   IDOC
     Begin
     EDI_DC40
     E1WPA01
        E1WPA02
Now as can be seen, EDI_DC40 is the header record common for the eniter idoc. But the segment E1WPA01 will repeat for each item sent from R/3. E1WPA01 in turn has many segments within it whcih corresponds to that one item.
Now the problem i am facing is, I did the mapping for all required fields from E1WPA01 to my file structure and it works fine if i send one 1 instance of E1WPA01. But when i send multiple instance of E1WPA01 for each item, my result in teh file should be 1 line of record for each E1WPA01. But this doesnt happen. It takes allE1WPA01 as 1 and gives only one record in the file.
How can this be overcome? this is a very common requirments? did i miss anything in the configuration?
Thnaks,
Yash

Hi Matias,
I have two instances (may be much more than 2) of the same segment in the idoc (E1WPA01) and each instance should create a new root in the target message structure as in the link below
Link: [http://img299.imageshack.us/my.php?image=image3ct6.png]
I have mapped the segment E1WPA01 with the root like this:
Link: [http://img176.imageshack.us/my.php?image=image2of6.png]
Hence it creates 1 root for each segment. But for complex mappings such as:
Link: [http://img337.imageshack.us/my.php?image=image1yu1.png]
the 2 input parameter to the UDF - KONDART and KONDWERT - the queue can be seen. the problem which i m facing here is in this queue, values from both the instnace of the segment E1WPA01 is taken together where each instance should be processed seperately. The first 4 values in the top queue(till VKP0) belongs to the filed KONDART of the 1st isntance of the segment and the 1st 4 values of the below queue (till 17) belongs to the field KONDWERT. Similarly the remaining belogns to the other segment. My logic in UDF is built taking only one instance at a time. Is there anyway i can distinguish between the two instance within my UDF?
I hope u understand my problem here.
Thanks,
Yash

Idoc-xi-file scenario. how to display file in html format

I am not sure whether this is a valid question.........but want to confirm as it was asked by somebody
In idoc-xi-file scenario....... how to display file in html format ??
Thanks in advance
Kumar

Hi Vijayakumar,
Thanks for your reply !! You mean to say I got to use XSLT mapping and also .htm and .html extension together to produce the html file ?? or it is sufficient to use any one of them to produce the html file ??
Regards
Kumar

In idoc to file scenario, if XI system is down where do idocs pile up?

In idoc to file scenario, if XI system is down where do idocs pile up (get stuck)
what tcode can I use to reprocess it?

Sender System ,Check BD87 .. you will see alll the IDOCs in Yellow state ..
You can reprocess all the IDOCs in go from there .. if only they are in yellow state ...
regards
PS

FIle Content Conversion Problem in IDOC-XI-File Scenario

Dear All,
I am doing IDOC-XI-FILE scenario.
I am facing one problem related to File Content Coversion.My requirement was to generate a dynamic file like %store_code%_%current_date%_sitemaster.xml , I have completed the dynamic generation successfully .
Now there is slight change in the requirement ,we have to suppress the current_date node of the xml content . i have tried to suppress the current_date using these DATE.fieldFixedLengths 0 , Date.fixedLengthTooShortHandling Cut , But I am unable to suppress it Can some body provide me the details on this .
The output xml version generated by Reciever file adapter is as below :
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
- <ns0:MT_SITE_MASTER xmlns:ns0="http://sample-xitest.com/sitemaster">
- <SITE_DATA>
<STORE_CODE>N002</STORE_CODE>
<TITLE_MEDI>Company</TITLE_MEDI>
<STORE_NAME>Mount Road</STORE_NAME>
<STREET>Chennai</STREET>
<COUNTRY>IN</COUNTRY>
<SALES_TAX_NO>12345678910</SALES_TAX_NO>
</SITE_DATA>
</ns0:MT_SITE_MASTER>
Plz provide me the code I have to write in the file content conversion .
Thanks in advance
Regards
Prabhat

If u see my earlier reply, I mentioned that u can not suppress the field from the one node.i.e Form SITE_DATA data type u can not suppress the field called CURRENT_DATE.
My suggestion is that , modify the Data type in such a way that you will be having two nodes as I have mentioned earlier. Then use the Suppress Logic for the Current Date.
So it will look like this-
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
- <ns0:MT_SITE_MASTER xmlns:ns0="http://sample-xitest.com/sitemaster">
- <SITE_DATA>
<STORE_CODE>N002</STORE_CODE>
<TITLE_MEDI>Company</TITLE_MEDI>
<STORE_NAME>Mount Road</STORE_NAME>
<STREET>Chennai</STREET>
<COUNTRY>IN</COUNTRY>
<SALES_TAX_NO>12345678910</SALES_TAX_NO>
</SITE_DATA>
<CURR_DATE>
<CURRENT_DATE>20051105</CURRENT_DATE>
</CURR_DATE>
</ns0:MT_SITE_MASTER>
So ur SITE_DATA is not having a field called CURRENT_DATE. This field is in separate node (segment ) called CURR_DATE. Now u can use the Suppress Logic for the same like this.
CURR_DATE.fieldFixedLengths - 0
CURR_DATE.fixedLengthTooShortHanling - Cut
And in your Variable Substitution you can use the date from the other segment called CURR_DATE.
Hope this solves ur problem.
Regards,
Moorthy

Error/Doubts in Idoc-XI-File scenario

Dear All,
I am doing one scenario in which DELIVERY idoc is posted from R/3 to XI and then from XI that idoc is to be sent as flat file to one local folder.
For this scenario, I have done all ALE settings and I am able to see the idoc in XI in cXML format.Now I want to sent it as flat file.
Now, for doing this I created 2 BS & 2 TS. 1 BS & TS of type Third Party for receiver & 1 BS & TS are of type Web as ABAP for sender. Then I have created one namespace in IR. I have not created any DT, MT, MI, MM becoz the structure of source and target file are same. Now, I created one IM in which I specified specified Type as "ABAP Class" & Mapping program name as one of the Z function module as specified in one of the SAP Guides.
Then in ID, I created 2 Parties ie. one for Sender & one for receiver. Sender is having a communication channel of type Idoc & receiver is having communication channel of type File. And thn further Receiver Agreement, Inetrface Determination, Sender Agreement & Receiver Agreement are configured.
In my system there is one scenario already configured which is using Delivery idoc so I have used party in my scenario for both sender & receiver.
Now, when I am sending the idoc from R/3, I am able to see cXML in SXMB_MONI but it is taking receiver as the one which is defined for the already existing scenario but not the receiver defined by me.
Can anybody guide if I have followed the correct steps & where I am doing the error.
Warm Regards,
N.Jain

Hi ,
Plese refer the following blogs ,
IDoc to File
/people/prateek.shah/blog/2005/06/08/introduction-to-idoc-xi-file-scenario-and-complete-walk-through-for-starters
You have to do all this settings mentioned in the docuemnt:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/xi/sapR3%28Idocs%29ToXI--Steps+Summarized&
Also can you check this weblogs on the same:
/people/swaroopa.vishwanath/blog/2007/01/22/ale-configuration-for-pushing-idocs-from-sap-to-xi
/people/venugopalarao.immadisetty/blog/2007/01/24/troubleshooting-file-to-idoc-scenario-in-xi
/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/03/29/xi-error--unable-to-convert-the-sender-service-to-an-ale-logical-system
/people/ravikumar.allampallam/blog/2005/02/23/configuration-steps-required-for-posting-idocsxi
/people/saravanakumar.kuppusamy2/blog/2005/01/20/configuration-tips-for-a-business-serviceintegration-process-to-send-back-ale-audit-idoc
Thanks ,
Suvarna
Award pts if it helps .

Integration server as logical system in IDoc to file scenario

Hi,
Will we configure integration server as logical system in IDoc to file scenario or the RFC destination related to the port will be suffice?
For which logical system will the outbound partner profile configured?
Regards,
Gajendra.

Hello,
I feel that the RFC destination linked to the port is the key here.
Because the scenario (IDoc to File) works in both the cases:
Case 1: Used the logical system as Integration server
Case 2: Used the logical system related to the file (third party) in the SLD.
In both the above cases the RFC destination points to the integration server.
Is this the case that in the XI scenarios (where IDoc are sent) the logical system name in the partner profile is just dummy and has not much significance??
It is the port that matters and once the Idoc reaches XI the routing takes place based on the configuration in ID.
Thanks.
Regards,
Gajendra.

How to suppress the Acknowledgement Error in IDOC to File scenario?

Hi -
I got the status in SXMB_MONI as 'Processed Successfully' for the IDOC to File scenario but the Acknoledgement status throws an error saying 'Acknowledgement not possible'.
I read one of the documents in the forums on how to suppress the acknowledgement using a table on R/3 side using IDXNOALE,
i tried that option but i still get the 'Acknowledgement not possible' error.
Is there any other way to suppress this error?
Thanks,
Tirumal

Hi Tirumal,
Receiver adapters that run on the Adapter Engine support system acknowledgments if they are requested by the sender. Acknowledgements are triggered when a message is successfully processed by the adapter or if an error occurs while it is being processed. Receiver adapters do not support application acknowledgments. The RNIF and CIDX adapters are exceptions to this rule, since they also support scenario-dependent application acknowledgments. Sender adapters of the Adapter Engine do not request any acknowledgments.
This means, JDBC adapter does only send system acks, however IDoc adapter is requesting application acks. Therefore as mentioned by the previous poster, you have to disable acks for this scenario using report IDX_NOALE.
Also go through these documents for any further help:
http://sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/library/xi/xi-how-to-guides/how to handle acknowledgments for idoc.pdf
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/6a/e6194119d8f323e10000000a155106/content.htm
Regards,
abhy

IDOC to file scenario

Hi Experts,
In IDOC to file scenario i did in this way.
1)created logical system.
2)Using SALE tcode I assign logical system to client ,created RFC destination,Port and Partner's profile.
It is showing all the thing correct.
3) In XI system , I configured using IDX1 and IDX2.
Then I created the material and checked the status which is green in we05.
But in tcode IDX5, the material is not coming.
Here I am confused that why data is not coming to XI system.
can anyone help me?
Thanks
Rabi

Hi,
The Following are the Possible checks
1) Check in R/3 side SMQ1 & SMQ2
2) Check in R/3 side SM58
   In R/3 system, Goto SM58 tcode and see if the IDOC have stuck up in Queue.
   If the entry is available then select it and press F6, to push it manually.
    This happens normally if IDOC stuck up in queues.
3) Check in PI SMQ2 and IDX5
regards,
ganesh.

PI 7.1 scenario -- File to File , File to IDOC and IDoc to File Scenario

Hi All,
*I have PI 7.0 . I have in that File to File , File to IDOC and IDoc to File Scenarios*
File to File -- This scenario is working fine.
File to IDOC -- Setting done in PI 7.0 like SM59, IDXI, IDX2 and in R/3 like SALE (logical system)--- This scenario is working fine.
IDoc to File -- Seeting done in R/3 like SALE (Logical system, Distrubtion Model (Port, Partner Profile)) -- This scenario is working fine.
Now I need to move to PI 7.1 -- for File to File , File to IDOC and IDoc to File Scenarios.
Please let me know do I require to make any changes in Design and Configuration and settings in PI 7.1 and R/3 for above scenarios or it will work fine as it is already working for PI 7.0
If changes are required please let me know what changes to do for each scaenario and pls also send blogs for that.
Regards

>
Rickkk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Idoc metadeta is updated through idx2?
>
> Regards
If there is no metadata maintained for an idoc type, the metadata for that idoc type gets loaded when an idoc of that type is received by PI for the first time. If you are looking at loading metadata of all idoc types before the first run, its really not required. Just make sure that the port is configured properly. Although, there is no harm in preloading the metadata using IDX2.
You need to use IDX2 mandatorily when the the metadata changes and the metadata in ECC and PI is different. In that case, you need to delete metadata for the changed IDoc type and then either you can update the metada through IDX2 or let the system take care of.

Error in IDoc to file scenario

Hi Experts,
I am working on IDoc to File scenario.IDoc is sccessfully reached XI.In SXMB_MONI it is showing error in request mapping.Error is
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
- 
- <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="">
<SAP:Category>XIServer</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="MAPPING">JCO_SYSTEM_FAILURE</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1>max no of 100 conversations exceeded / CPIC-CALL: 'ThSAPCMRCV' No memory availab</SAP:P1>
<SAP:P2 />
<SAP:P3 />
<SAP:P4 />
<SAP:AdditionalText />
<SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
<SAP:Stack>"SYSTEM FAILURE" during JCo call. max no of 100 conversations exceeded / CPIC-CALL: 'ThSAPCMRCV' No memory availab</SAP:Stack>
<SAP:Retry>A</SAP:Retry>
</SAP:Error>
Please suggest me in this issue.
Thanks,
Bhuvan.

Check this link:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/bb/ad1c3d2b058c4ce10000000a114084/
You might want to refer to the SAP NOTE: 316877
Regards,
Ravi

Problem in idoc to file scenario

hi
while creating the idoc to file scenario i am facing few problems.
1) My design time objects are working fine. i have checked my message mapping, message interface etc.. (all design time objects are in active mode).
2) In ID, i have tested my configuration in test configuration, its working fine there as well (in ID i am using 2 business service one for sender, one for receiver)
3) i am using my ecc6 training server as my sender and using my XI server as receiver.
4) i am sending idoc from ecc6 and converting it to file in XI server and saving it in XI server itself(my receiver in this case).
my error:
i send my idoc from we19 transaction, and i see a error message stating
that 'RCVR_DETERMINATION.NO_RECEIVER_CASE_ASYNC'
my doubts.
1) while sending the idoc from ecc6, is it mandatory to give process code in partner profile ( that is, assign an outbound function module to push the created idoc to the mentioned destination).
2) also is it mandatory to have a partner profile on the receiver side( XI in this case) along with inbound process code.
3) in my receiver adapter ( file adatper in this case ) i have used NFS protocal. is it rite?
kindly help me with this issue.
regards
manoharan

>
manoj murugesan wrote:
> 1) while sending the idoc from ecc6, is it mandatory to give process code in partner profile ( that is, assign an outbound function module to push the created idoc to the mentioned destination).
>
> 2) also is it mandatory to have a partner profile on the receiver side( XI in this case) along with inbound process code.
>
> 3) in my receiver adapter ( file adatper in this case ) i have used NFS protocal. is it rite?
>
>
> kindly help me with this issue.
>
>
> regards
> manoharan
and to 1 & 2 ref. below,
Configuration steps required for posting idoc's(XI) -
/people/ravikumar.allampallam/blog/2005/02/23/configuration-steps-required-for-posting-idocsxi
ALE configuration for pushing idocs from SAP to XI -
/people/swaroopa.vishwanath/blog/2007/01/22/ale-configuration-for-pushing-idocs-from-sap-to-xi
3. NFS protocol is used to read/write files to the XI server itself. If you have to write to a local machine then use FTP

FCC parameter in IDoc to File scenario

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for