FCoE Load balance question on 7k and 5k

Hi,
Let me start from basic step to verify the fundamental. Does the fcoe storage load balance SID/DID refer to source-dest-mac or source-dest-ip? in 5k
Can the PO load balance be specified exclusively to storage VDC? only?. Currently, the load balance is configurable only from default-vdc. This being the case, is there a way to achieve as a storage VDC specific?
Thanks,
Damodaran

Similar Messages

Load Balancing question

My company is in the process of building a small scale network architecture strictly for testing purposes. We have a DMZ area that contains 2 load balancers and 1 web server. The web server is a SunFire 280 and has two gig e nics. They want to cable one nic to one load balancer and one nic to the other. Since this is only one box we have to put the nics on separate subnets. The question is, can I configure the load balancers in a failover situation of an active active situation with one load balancer on one vlan and another load balancer on a separate vlan.

I did not able to understand why you want to give ip to two NICs from different subnets.
There is NO any requirement, like that. If you have your own requirement can you explain me that?
Ashman

Exchange 2013 Load Balancing Question

Hey Everyone,
I have recently started building up my companies Exchange 2013 environment and ran into some questions that I can't seem to find clear answers for on Google.
First, a little bit about my set up:
2 CAS Servers
2 Mailbox Servers
Citrix NetScaler load balancing the external URL (Controlling all incoming ports 25, 80, 443, 587, 993, and 995) to both of my CAS servers
This is not doing SSL offloading, it's just forwarding encrypted traffic to the CAS servers
I have configured a DAG between the 2 mailbox servers and am able to actively move the database my user account is on between the 2 copies with outlook disconnecting / reconnecting in about 10 - 15 seconds of moving it.
My questions started when I saw what Outlook was filling in for the "Server" field once autodiscover set it up. I found this very strange server name in it: *** Email address is removed for privacy ***
Once I read up on it, I think i understand what it does. If i understand correctly, this weird URL is sort of like an old CAS array from Exchange 2010. When I started testing the failover is when I started running into issues.
When I shut down one of my mailbox servers, my outlook will lose connection and it won't come back. The mailbox database that my user account is on successfully failed over to the other DAG copy but outlook never correctly connects. I
believe this issue has something to do with the new CAS functions of Exchange 2013 since DAG works fine.
If I look at my "Connection Status" in Outlook, I see that there are several connections open. All of them have a Proxy server address of "exchange.domain.com" and out of the 3 that show up there, they are all pointed to
the weird URL mentioned above.
Whew, long post but let me summarize my questions below:
1) If exchange is configured to be fully redundant, why does my outlook disconnect when I shut down one of the servers?
2) What is the weird URL pointing to that I mentioned above that is showing in outlook?
3) How can I get outlook to correctly not lose it's connection when any 1 of the servers goes down?
Thanks,
Zac

Hi,
According to your description, it seems that the load balancer did not configure successfully.
I recommend you refer to the following article to configure the load balancer for Exchange 2013 :
http://blogs.vmware.com/vsphere/2012/11/load-balancing-using-vcloud-networking-and-security-5-1-edge.html
Hope this helps!
Thanks.
Niko Cheng
TechNet Community Support

SO Load Balancing Question

Hi all,
I have a service object (SO1) which has been set to Load Balancing.
This service object has an attribute which serves as a number allocator
(NA1).
This NA1 provides a unique number across the whole application for each of
the record that require to store into DB.
The problem is, will the NA1 get replicated if the SO1 is replicated?
If yes, will NA1 crash?
Regards,
Martin Chan
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Senior Analyst/Programmer
Dept of Education and Training
Mobile : 0413-996-116
Email: martin.chandet.nsw.edu.au
Tel: 02-9942-9685

Hi Serge,
Could you prefix it with the PID of the load balanced process ?No I can't. At least not at the moment.
When a service object is replicated, it is automatically replicated into adifferent partition...
Thanks.
An advice, make the NA1 shared. So if you get to do multithreaded accessto
it, you won't screw up things.I am thinking it may be better off to create it as a service object on it's
own.
How is the number returned by the NA1 generated ?It gets generated by Forte's code.
... Try to make it so that the
load balanced partitions don't need to access the database more than onein
5 min. to get a new Seed Key. This would not need to PID.Thanks for your advise.
Regards
Martin Chan
-----Original Message-----
From: Serge Blais [mailto:Serge.BlaisSun.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 3 April 2001 14:17
To: Chan, Martin
Subject: RE: (forte-users) SO Load Balancing Question
Your right, they can generate the same number. How much control do you have
over the ID being generated? Could you prefix it with the PID of the load
balanced process ?
Just a note: When a service object is replicated, it is automatically
replicated into a different partition, possibly on the same machine or on a
different one.
An advice, make the NA1 shared. So if you get to do multithreaded access to
it, you won't screw up things.
How is the number returned by the NA1 generated ? If NA1 is using a stored
procedure, or something like:
Start TRX
read number
newnumber = number+5000
write back newnumber
End Trx
Something like will be very safe. The Database Index Table is taking care
of the critical section. Then you can be sure that each replicate can be
independent (not hit into each other) for 5000 iterations. Depending on the
frequency, you may want to up this number or lower this number. Too high it
would make the key very high very soon with wholes in the sequence. Too low
and you would have hit between the replicates. Try to make it so that the
load balanced partitions don't need to access the database more than one in
5 min. to get a new Seed Key. This would not need to PID.
Serge
At 01:59 PM 4/3/2001 +1000, you wrote:
Hi Serge,
The number return by the NA1 is used as a primary key for each of therecord
that stores in the DB.
The Number Allocator NA1 is required to access to DB to update an ID table
which carry the next available sequence number. NA1 will only update this
table for every 5000 records.
For example, the initial value of the sequence is: 1
The next update will change the value to 5001, next will be 10001 and soon.
>
The properties of this NA1 class at runtime
Shared - Disallowed
Distributed - Disallowed
Transactional - Is Default
Monitored - Disallowed
Unfortunately, this attribute is not a handle but is instantiated by theSO1
itself.
I have been thinking, if SO1 is replicated within the same partition, and
each replicate will carry its own NA1. NA1 and the replicate of NA1 may
return a same number if their initial values of the sequence are the same.
Correct?
Regards
Martin Chan
-----Original Message-----
From: Serge Blais [mailto:Serge.BlaisSun.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 3 April 2001 13:11
To: Chan, Martin; forte-userslists.xpedior.com
Subject: Re: (forte-users) SO Load Balancing Question
Let's see if I understand right.
You have a service object that keep a handle to an object that either keep
state information, or that generate state information. Now the thing to
figure out is which is it. Let's assume that NA1 is a number generator,
that does not need to be synchronized or that doesn't need to access any
external resource. It would still work, depending on the algorythm you are
using.
Will they share the same NA1? It depends on the nature of NA1, but for sure
NA1 would have to be an anchored object. An if multiple partitions would
share the same object "only" for key generation, you would bring down your
performance on key generation or key update (by adding one inter-process
call).
In short:
1. Many scenarios can happen, you need to be clearer on your description.
2. If you are sharing an object by load balanced partitions, this greatly
reduce the gain of load balancing the partition.
3. If NA1 is keeping state, any access to it would need to be controlled
"shared".
Have fun now...
Serge
At 12:30 PM 4/3/2001 +1000, Chan, Martin wrote:
Hi all,
I have a service object (SO1) which has been set to Load Balancing.
This service object has an attribute which serves as a number allocator
(NA1).
This NA1 provides a unique number across the whole application for each
of
the record that require to store into DB.
The problem is, will the NA1 get replicated if the SO1 is replicated?
If yes, will NA1 crash?
Regards,
Martin Chan
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Senior Analyst/Programmer
Dept of Education and Training
Mobile : 0413-996-116
Email: martin.chandet.nsw.edu.au
Tel: 02-9942-9685
For the archives, go to: http://lists.xpedior.com/forte-users and use
the login: forte and the password: archive. To unsubscribe, send in a new
email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to: forte-users-requestlists.xpedior.comSerge Blais
Professional Services Engineer
iPlanet Expertise Center
Sun Professional Services
Cell : (514) 234-4110
Serge.BlaisSun.comSerge Blais
Professional Services Engineer
iPlanet Expertise Center
Sun Professional Services
Cell : (514) 234-4110
Serge.BlaisSun.com

IPlanet sticky load balancing question

We have two iPlanet Application Servers v6.0 sp3 and two iPlanet
Enterprise Web servers v4.1. All machines are on the same domain name.
All machines point to the same LDAP server. The application has been
installed on both App servers. Clustering has been configured in the
App server Admin tool to be based upon system load. For non-sticky load
balancing, all works fine, and session information is carried over
properly. However, for sticky load balancing, hits going into either of
the Web servers do not always go back to the App server that first
started the session.
The online iPlanet documentation says it can be done, but we have found
differently. Has anybody else gotten this to work?
Thank you,
David Shade

Hi David,
With sticky load balancing enabled, when you execute the application first
time it will go to any kjs depending on your load banancing criteria which
you set (Round robin or server responce or whatever), this applies to only
for the first time when you send request, afterwords it will be executed in
that perticular KJS process only till that KJS is alive, whatever may be
your LoadB creteria.
You please kill that kjs and see, you will be able to see the failover.
Feel free to mail me for any further information.
Sanjeev,
Developer Support Team iAS-India.
David Shade wrote:
We have two iPlanet Application Servers v6.0 sp3 and two iPlanet
Enterprise Web servers v4.1. All machines are on the same domain name.
All machines point to the same LDAP server. The application has been
installed on both App servers. Clustering has been configured in the
App server Admin tool to be based upon system load. For non-sticky load
balancing, all works fine, and session information is carried over
properly. However, for sticky load balancing, hits going into either of
the Web servers do not always go back to the App server that first
started the session.
The online iPlanet documentation says it can be done, but we have found
differently. Has anybody else gotten this to work?
Thank you,
David Shade--
I have never learn not to learn...
------------------------------------------------------------------

Clustering problems and load balancing question

          I am using Weblogic 6.1. My Windows NT environment consists of 10 web client-simulator
          machines, 2 App. Server machines and one database server machine. I have defined
          one cluster on each app. server. Each cluster is running 3 Weblogic instances, or
          so it should be when I fix my problems!
          My questions/problems are the following:
          1. Can I use a software dispatcher to perform workload balancing between the 2 weblogic
          clusters? That is, the client-simulator machines send the requests to the software
          dispatcher which performs workload balancing between the 2 Weblogic clusters. The
          clusters perform round-robin amongst all instances. Note that the documentation only
          talks about Hardware Balancing.
          2. I am having problems with my multicast IP addresses. For instance, on one App.
          Server machine, I am using the multicast IP address: 239.0.0.1 for MyCluster. When
          I start the Admin Server, I get a JDBC error: "... multicast socket error: Request
          Time Out". I have used the utils.MulticastTest utility which shows the packets not
          being received:
          I (S1) sent message num 1
          I (S1) sent message num 2
          I (S1) sent message num 3
          I (S1) sent message num 4
          What am I doing wrong?
          3. Re. the cluster configuration:
          NOTE: I have executed my workload using 2 independent App. Server machines with a
          software dispatcher - no clustering. Each App. Server used a jdbc connection pool
          of 84 database connections. The db connections happened to become my bottleneck.
          When I tried to increase the number of connections in the jdbc pool, throughput decreased
          dramatically. Thus, I decided to add a cluster of Weblogic instances to each one
          of my 8 x 900Mhz machines in order to scale up. Unfortunatly, adding clusters have
          not been that simple a task - probably because I am totally new to the Web Application
          Server world!
          Here is what I've got so far:
          I have obtained 3 static IP addresses for the 3 instances of Weblogic instances that
          I wish to run within the cluster. All servers in the cluster use port number 80.
          There is a corresponding DNS entry for each IP address. My base assumption is that
          one of these instances will double up as the Administration Server... Is it true,
          or do I need to define a separate Admin server if I wish to run 3 Weblogic instances
          (each with a connection pool of 84 database connections for a total of 252 database
          connections)?
          Do I need to re-deploy my applications for the cluster? And if so, would this explain
          why I am having problem starting my Admin Server?
          I think this is it for now. Any help will be greatly appreciated!
          Thanks in advance,
          Guylaine.


          Guylaine Cantin wrote:
          > I am using Weblogic 6.1. My Windows NT environment consists of 10 web client-simulator
          > machines, 2 App. Server machines and one database server machine. I have defined
          > one cluster on each app. server. Each cluster is running 3 Weblogic instances, or
          > so it should be when I fix my problems!
          >
          > My questions/problems are the following:
          >
          > 1. Can I use a software dispatcher to perform workload balancing between the 2 weblogic
          > clusters? That is, the client-simulator machines send the requests to the software
          > dispatcher which performs workload balancing between the 2 Weblogic clusters. The
          > clusters perform round-robin amongst all instances. Note that the documentation only
          > talks about Hardware Balancing.
          >
          We also support software load balancers (for e.g. resonate)
          The software dispatcher should be intelligent enough to decode the
          cookie and route the request to the appropriate servers. This is
          necessary to maintain sticky load balancing.
          > 2. I am having problems with my multicast IP addresses. For instance, on one App.
          > Server machine, I am using the multicast IP address: 239.0.0.1 for MyCluster. When
          > I start the Admin Server, I get a JDBC error: "... multicast socket error: Request
          > Time Out". I have used the utils.MulticastTest utility which shows the packets not
          > being received:
          >
          > I (S1) sent message num 1
          > I (S1) sent message num 2
          > I (S1) sent message num 3
          > I (S1) sent message num 4
          > ...
          >
          > What am I doing wrong?
          >
          You should run the above utility from multiple windows and see if each
          of them being recognized or not.
          i.e. java utils.MulticastTest -N S1 -A 239.0.0.1
          java utils.MulticastTest -N S1 -A 239.0.0.1
          > 3. Re. the cluster configuration:
          >
          > NOTE: I have executed my workload using 2 independent App. Server machines with a
          > software dispatcher - no clustering. Each App. Server used a jdbc connection pool
          > of 84 database connections. The db connections happened to become my bottleneck.
          > When I tried to increase the number of connections in the jdbc pool, throughput decreased
          > dramatically. Thus, I decided to add a cluster of Weblogic instances to each one
          > of my 8 x 900Mhz machines in order to scale up. Unfortunatly, adding clusters have
          > not been that simple a task - probably because I am totally new to the Web Application
          > Server world!
          >
          You have to stress test your application several times and set
          maxCapacity of the conn pool accordingly.
          > Here is what I've got so far:
          >
          > I have obtained 3 static IP addresses for the 3 instances of Weblogic instances that
          > I wish to run within the cluster. All servers in the cluster use port number 80.
          > There is a corresponding DNS entry for each IP address. My base assumption is that
          > one of these instances will double up as the Administration Server... Is it true,
          > or do I need to define a separate Admin server if I wish to run 3 Weblogic instances
          > (each with a connection pool of 84 database connections for a total of 252 database
          > connections)?
          BEA recommends to use Admin server for administrative tasks only
          like configuring new deployments, jdbc conn pools, adding users etc..
          It's not a good idea to have admin server part of cluster.
          >
          > Do I need to re-deploy my applications for the cluster? And if so, would this explain
          > why I am having problem starting my Admin Server?
          >
          You have to target all your apps to the Cluster.
          > I think this is it for now. Any help will be greatly appreciated!
          >
          > Thanks in advance,
          >
          > Guylaine.
          >

BIP and Siebel server - file system and load balancing question

1. I just need to understand whenever the reports are generated through BIP, are there reports stored on some local directory (say Reports) on the BIP server or Siebel File system? If on a File system how will archiving policy be implemented.
2. When we talk of load balancing BIP Server. Can the common load balancer be used for BIP and Siebel servers?
http://myforums.oracle.com/jive3/thread.jspa?threadID=335601

Hi Sravanthi,
Please check the below for finding ITS and WAS parameters from backend :
For ITS - Go to SE37 >> Utilities >> Setting >> Click on ICON Right Top Corner in popup window >> Select Internet Transaction Server >> you will find the Standard Path and HTTP URL.
For WAS - Go to SE37 >> Run FM - RSBB_URL_PREFIX_GET >> Execute it >> you will find PRefix and PAth paramter for WAS.
Please refer to this may help step-by-step : How-to create a portal system for using it in Visual Composer
Hope it helps
Regards
Arun

JMS cluster and distributed destination load balancing question

          Hi All
          Scenario: 2 WL 7 servers in cluster with distributed queue in both of them and
          both the servers have an MDB deployed for the queue. Now if a producer in server
          #1 writes to the Queue - he will write to the local queue - right?
          In that case will the local MDB pick up the message or that can be load balanced?
          OR the write it self can be load balanced?
          I really want either the write or the read to be load balanced - but I suspect
          server affinity will play a mess here. Can anyone pls clarify.
          thanks
          Anamitra


          Hi All
          Scenario: 2 WL 7 servers in cluster with distributed queue in both of them and
          both the servers have an MDB deployed for the queue. Now if a producer in server
          #1 writes to the Queue - he will write to the local queue - right?
          In that case will the local MDB pick up the message or that can be load balanced?
          OR the write it self can be load balanced?
          I really want either the write or the read to be load balanced - but I suspect
          server affinity will play a mess here. Can anyone pls clarify.
          thanks
          Anamitra

VO's and load balancing question

Hi guys,
As anyone got any experience in load balancing a web application using ADF BC's (EO's and VO's) and any problems that I face?
I am researching possible problems that will pop up while deploying my application. I want to have my app running on two servers and put some form of load balancer (hardware or software) in front of them. One issue I can think of is that when someone commits something on one server the VO cache on the other server will not get updated. This is a problem if there is a user on each server and they are both accessing the same row.
Regards
Barry
JDev: 10.1.3.2
JHS: 10.1.2.26

Hi,
this is what you want to read :
http://download-uk.oracle.com/docs/html/B25947_01/bcstatemgmt.htm#sm0318
You can handle state across instance of an AM within BC using a database
Frank

Load-balancing issues with iPlanet and multiple clusters

We're in performance test of a large-scale clustered deployment based on WLS 5.1sp10.
Due to scalability/functionality issues, some of which we've seen firsthand and
some of which we've been informed of by associates as well as BEA representatives,
we've chosen to implement multiple clusters with a maximum of three nodes each.
These clusters will be fronted by a web server tier consisting of iPlanet servers
using the proxy plugin.
Due to hardware constraints (both in test and in production), however, we've configured
the iPlanet servers to route across the multiple clusters. In our test environment,
for instance, we've got a single iPlanet server routing across two 3-node clusters,
and the configuration in obj.conf is as follows:
<Object name="application" ppath="*/application">
Service fn="wl-proxy" \
WebLogicCluster="clusterA_1:9990,clusterB_1:9991,clusterA_2:9990,clusterB_2:9991,clusterA_3:9990,
clusterB_3:9991" \
CookieName="ApplicationSession"
</Object>
Our issue is that the load-balancing doesn't appear to work across the clusters.
We're seeing one cluster get about 90% of the load, while the other receives
only 10%.
So, the question (finally!) is: Is this configuration correct (i.e., will it
work according to the logic of the proxy plugin), and is it appropriate for this
situation? Are there other alternative approaches that anyone can recommend?
Thanks in advance,
cramer

I use weblogic6.1 with sp2+windows 2000.I develop a web application and deploy
it to cluster.Through HttpClusterServlets proxy of weblogic I found that a server
in cluster almost get 95% of requests but another only get 5% of requests.Why???
I don't set any special parameter.And the weight of the two clustered server is
equal.I use round-robin arithmetic.
Thanks!
"cramer" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
We're in performance test of a large-scale clustered deployment based
on WLS 5.1sp10.
Due to scalability/functionality issues, some of which we've seen firsthand
and
some of which we've been informed of by associates as well as BEA representatives,
we've chosen to implement multiple clusters with a maximum of three nodes
each.
These clusters will be fronted by a web server tier consisting of iPlanet
servers
using the proxy plugin.
Due to hardware constraints (both in test and in production), however,
we've configured
the iPlanet servers to route across the multiple clusters. In our test
environment,
for instance, we've got a single iPlanet server routing across two 3-node
clusters,
and the configuration in obj.conf is as follows:
<Object name="application" ppath="*/application">
Service fn="wl-proxy" \
WebLogicCluster="clusterA_1:9990,clusterB_1:9991,clusterA_2:9990,clusterB_2:9991,clusterA_3:9990,
clusterB_3:9991" \
CookieName="ApplicationSession"
</Object>
Our issue is that the load-balancing doesn't appear to work across the
clusters.
We're seeing one cluster get about 90% of the load, while the other
receives
only 10%.
So, the question (finally!) is: Is this configuration correct (i.e.,
will it
work according to the logic of the proxy plugin), and is it appropriate
for this
situation? Are there other alternative approaches that anyone can recommend?
Thanks in advance,
cramer

CSS load balancing questions

I hope that someone can help with 2 simple (i think) CSS questions.
1. When configured properly for load balancing, should the CSS round-robin between servers or will it continue to use only one server until triggered by some event or parameter?
2. If 1 of 2 load balanced servers fails, how does load balancing proceed? Will it continue to try to load balance between the servers or will it give up on the failed server unitil some event or timeout occurs?
Thanks in advance,
Eliot

Hi Eliot,
The CSS can be configured to perform load balancing in a variety of different ways. Least connections, round robin, ACA etc. Each new connection through the CSS will be round robined over each of the servers in your server group.
If a server fails then the CSS will know it has failed through the use of keepalives (based on TCP connection, ICMP etc) and no longer send requests through to that server. Traffic associated with a previous connection to the failed server will be sent to on of the surviving servers. It is then up to the behavior of the application as to if the user experiences any disruption.
Hope this helps
Brett

ESXi 4.1 NIC Teaming's Load-Balancing Algorithm,Nexus 7000 and UCS

Hi, Cisco Gurus:
Please help me in answering the following questions (UCSM 1.4(xx), 2 UCS 6140XP, 2 Nexus 7000, M81KR in B200-M2, No Nexus 1000V, using VMware Distributed Switch:
Q1. For me to configure vPC on a pair of Nexus 7000, do I have to connect Ethernet Uplink from each Cisco Fabric Interconnect to the 2 Nexus 7000 in a bow-tie fashion? If I connect, say 2 10G ports from Fabric Interconnect 1 to 1 Nexus 7000 and similar connection from FInterconnect 2 to the other Nexus 7000, in this case can I still configure vPC or is it a validated design? If it is, what is the pro and con versus having 2 connections from each FInterconnect to 2 separate Nexus 7000?
Q2. If vPC is to be configured in Nexus 7000, is it COMPULSORY to configure Port Channel for the 2 Fabric Interconnects using UCSM? I believe it is not. But what is the pro and con of HAVING NO Port Channel within UCS versus HAVING Port Channel when vPC is concerned?
Q3. if vPC is to be configured in Nexus 7000, I understand there is a limitation on confining to ONLY 1 vSphere NIC Teaming's Load-Balancing Algorithm i.e. Route Based on IP Hash. Is it correct?
Again, what is the pro and con here with regard to application behaviours when Layer 2 or 3 is concerned? Or what is the BEST PRACTICES?
I would really appreciate if someone can help me clear these lingering doubts of mine.
God Bless.
SiM

Sim,
Here are my thoughts without a 1000v in place,
Q1. For me to configure vPC on a pair of Nexus 7000, do I have to connect Ethernet Uplink from each Cisco Fabric Interconnect to the 2 Nexus 7000 in a bow-tie fashion? If I connect, say 2 10G ports from Fabric Interconnect 1 to 1 Nexus 7000 and similar connection from FInterconnect 2 to the other Nexus 7000, in this case can I still configure vPC or is it a validated design? If it is, what is the pro and con versus having 2 connections from each FInterconnect to 2 separate Nexus 7000? //Yes, for vPC to UCS the best practice is to bowtie uplink to (2) 7K or 5Ks.
Q2. If vPC is to be configured in Nexus 7000, is it COMPULSORY to configure Port Channel for the 2 Fabric Interconnects using UCSM? I believe it is not. But what is the pro and con of HAVING NO Port Channel within UCS versus HAVING Port Channel when vPC is concerned? //The port channel will be configured on both the UCSM and the 7K. The pro of a port channel would be both bandwidth and redundancy. vPC would be prefered.
Q3. if vPC is to be configured in Nexus 7000, I understand there is a limitation on confining to ONLY 1 vSphere NIC Teaming's Load-Balancing Algorithm i.e. Route Based on IP Hash. Is it correct? //Without the 1000v, I always tend to leave to dvSwitch load balence behavior at the default of "route by portID".
Again, what is the pro and con here with regard to application behaviours when Layer 2 or 3 is concerned? Or what is the BEST PRACTICES? UCS can perform L2 but Northbound should be performing L3.
Cheers,
David Jarzynka

Office Web App Load balancing Question

I am going to install office web app in load balanced farm behing f5. There are few questions i want to ask:
Do i first put servers in load balancer and start installing office web app or after installation of office web app in one server put that in load balancer and add another one or put both in load balancer and start installing.
While i tried without putting servers in load balancer with offload ssl parameter , when i tried to join second server in the farm it gave me error destination unreachable. Is it because with offload ssl parameter it is looking for load balancer or something
else? I checked port 809 from the servers and also verified the user was local admin in both machines.
Any insight will be helpful.
Adit

Pls refer below link for configuration of NLB for OWA servers:
http://blogs.technet.com/b/meamcs/archive/2013/03/27/office-web-apps-2013-multi-servers-nlb-installation-and-deployment-for-sharepoint-2013-step-by-step-guide.aspx
Please ensure that you mark a question as Answered once you receive a satisfactory response.

Hypothetical RAC load balancing question

Im trying to get a better understanding of RAC. Suppose I have the following tnsnames entry on Client1:
DEV =
(DESCRIPTION =
(ADDRESS_LIST =
(ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = dev010.net)(PORT = 1795))
(ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = dev020.net)(PORT = 1795))
(LOAD_BALANCE = yes)
(FAILOVER = yes)
(CONNECT_DATA =
(SERVER = DEDICATED)
(SERVICE_NAME = dev1)
(failover_mode=(type=select)(method=basic))
dev010.net and dev020.net are two nodes that I am trying to balance the connection from Client1 to.
dev010.net and dev020.net have the following listener.ora configurations respectively:
LISTENER_DEV1 =
(DESCRIPTION_LIST =
(DESCRIPTION =
(ADDRESS_LIST =
(ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = dev010.net)(PORT
= 1795))
SID_LIST_LISTENER_DEV1 =
(SID_LIST =
(SID_DESC =
(SID_NAME = PLSExtProc)
(ORACLE_HOME = /oracle/ora92)
(PROGRAM = extproc)
(SID_DESC =
(ORACLE_HOME = /oracle/ora92)
(SID_NAME = dev1)
LISTENER_DEV2 =
(DESCRIPTION_LIST =
(DESCRIPTION =
(ADDRESS_LIST =
(ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = dev020.net)(PORT
= 1795))
SID_LIST_LISTENER_DEV2 =
(SID_LIST =
(SID_DESC =
(SID_NAME = PLSExtProc)
(ORACLE_HOME = /oracle/ora92)
(PROGRAM = extproc)
(SID_DESC =
(ORACLE_HOME = /oracle/ora92)
(SID_NAME = dev2)
Question: since 'lsnrctl services' shows LISTENER_DEV1 and LISTENER_DEV2 are registered with services dev1 and dev2 respectively, how do I load balance Client1's connection between the two nodes if its service name is set to dev1?
Can you set up RAC with some sort of master listener?
Im new to RAC, so any help would be appreciated.

Try this:
LISTENER =
(ADDRESS_LIST =
        (ADDRESS =
          (PROTOCOL = IPC)
          (KEY = DB1.WORLD)
        (ADDRESS=
          (PROTOCOL = IPC)
          (KEY = DB1)
        (ADDRESS =
          (COMMUNITY = MYRAC.WORLD)
          (PROTOCOL = TCP)
          (HOST = )
          (PORT = 1521)
SID_LIST_LISTENER =
(SID_LIST =
    (SID_DESC =
      (SID_NAME = DB101)
      (ORACLE_HOME = /oracle/Ora92)
    (SID_DESC =
      (SID_NAME = DB102)
      (ORACLE_HOME = /oracle/Ora92)
)

Connection Load Balancing question

Hi All,
this is from oracle net8 Administrator's Guide (between double quotes):
"Connection load balancing improves connection performance by balancing the number of active connections among multiple dispatchers. In an Oracle Parallel Server environment, connection load balancing also has the capability to balance the number of active connections among multiple instances. "
My question is, from that statement above, does it mean that the connection load balancing can only be useful on a OPS with MTS instances?
and second is , does it make sense (or can it be done) to implement it on single instance of MTS?
TIA,
Andi

Hi Andi,
CLB is only used in cluster configuration! In single node instance there is no advantage for ovbious reason of putting one more layer.
you are right...use only with OPS and preferably with MTS.
Best,
G

FCoE Load balance question on 7k and 5k

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for