Fed up with VPN connection failures

Cant get a brand new laptop with built in wireless to get a VPN connection with a BEFW11s4 router. Internet is fine. An older laptop works fine. This new labtop even works beautifully with a wireless adapter,not the built in.
Called Linksys tech support line and they wouldnt even check anything. Basically dismissed me and said its the computer (did I mention is brand new??)Now I read all the problems people are having with VPN and their routers and I cant believe they lied to me.
(Mod note: Edited post. Non-technical content. Thanks!)
Message Edited by JOHNDOE_06 on 08-12-2006 11:10 PM

What do you use for the VPN connection? IPSEC? If you only are using the passthrough function on the router, it can only allow 1 IPSEC session at a time. If you are also using other VPN softwares for that, you may need to open up ports 1723 500 50 51 and 47. This is because your router firewall maybe the cause. Try that first on a static IP for that wireless card. Try to also check if the "wired " connection to your VPN works before going wireless, you would need to do this first regardless of any brand of router...ayt?!
"The war between heaven and hell depends on the choices we make, and those choices require sacrifice. That's the test"

Similar Messages

  • After upgrading on ios 6 i have problems with vpn connection..pls help if someone have the same problem

    problem with vpn connection after upgrading on ios6.pls help

    I've never been able to share FaceBook posts nor seen the option using the iOS FaceBook app regardless the FaceBook app and iOS version. I can Like and I can Comment, and if I select a link or video to view under iOS 6, I can use the Share option for the link or video, but not for a post.

  • User with VPN Connections cannot connect to our Oracle Database

    Hi Everyone,
    I am facing a problem today with our Production Database.
    User with our branches using VPN connection cannot connect to our Oracle Database.
    As per checking the alert log, I saw this message
    Fatal NI connect error 12170.
      VERSION INFORMATION:
      TNS for Linux: Version 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
      Oracle Bequeath NT Protocol Adapter for Linux: Version 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
      TCP/IP NT Protocol Adapter for Linux: Version 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
      Time: 13-AUG-2013 13:08:42
      Tracing not turned on.
      Tns error struct:
        ns main err code: 12535
    TNS-12535: TNS:operation timed out
        ns secondary err code: 12560
        nt main err code: 505
    TNS-00505: Operation timed out
        nt secondary err code: 110
        nt OS err code: 0
      Client address: (ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=tcp)(HOST=192.168.100.131)(PORT=1137))
    We are using Oracle 11gR2 Database running OEL 6
    Kindly help us to solve this.
    Thank you

    Hi Dude,
    My firewall is disable in my db host.
    I also check the firewall on client end and it is also disabled.
    I also talk to my Network Administrator for adjustment in Router and Firewall to allow port 1521 to accept connection but still unsuccessful.
    What seems to be the problem ?

  • JMS doesn't work with VPN connection on weblogic8.1

              Hi:
              We have used JMS topic on weblogic 7.x and we use both LAN and VPN connection.
              However, when we switch to weblogic 8.1, although it works fine when using
              LAN connection,
              it does not work when using VPN connection. We tried three different machines,
              got the same
              error.
              The error is:
              weblogic.jms.common.JMSException: Error creating connection on the server
              at weblogic.jms.client.JMSConnectionFactory.createConnectionInternal(JMS
              ConnectionFactory.java:160)
              at weblogic.jms.client.JMSConnectionFactory.createTopicConnection(JMSCon
              nectionFactory.java:95)
              at com.dynamex.decs.common.jms.DecsSubscriber.initialize(DecsSubscriber.
              java:59)
              at com.dynamex.decs.client.orderentry.swing.OrderEntry.initRMI(OrderEntr
              y.java:1714)
              at com.dynamex.decs.client.orderentry.swing.OrderEntry.<init>(OrderEntry
              .java:124)
              at com.dynamex.decs.client.orderentry.swing.OrderEntry.main(OrderEntry.j
              ava:3180)
              Caused by: java.rmi.MarshalException: CORBA COMM_FAILURE 1398079697 No; nested
              e
              xception is:
              org.omg.CORBA.COMM_FAILURE: vmcid: SUN minor code: 209 completed:
              No
              at com.sun.corba.se.internal.iiop.ShutdownUtilDelegate.mapSystemExceptio
              n(Unknown Source)
              at javax.rmi.CORBA.Util.mapSystemException(Unknown Source)
              at weblogic.jms.frontend._FEConnectionFactoryRemote_Stub.connectionCreat
              eRequest(_FEConnectionFactoryRemote_Stub.java:106)
              at weblogic.jms.client.JMSConnectionFactory.createConnectionInternal(JMS
              ConnectionFactory.java:139)
              ... 5 more
              Caused by: org.omg.CORBA.COMM_FAILURE: vmcid: SUN minor code: 209 completed:
              No
              at com.sun.corba.se.internal.iiop.IIOPConnection.purge_calls(Unknown Sou
              rce)
              at com.sun.corba.se.internal.iiop.MessageMediator.handleInput(Unknown
              So
              urce)
              at com.sun.corba.se.internal.iiop.messages.MessageBase.callback(Unknown
              Source)
              at com.sun.corba.se.internal.iiop.MessageMediator.processRequest(Unknown
              Source)
              at com.sun.corba.se.internal.iiop.IIOPConnection.processInput(Unknown
              So
              urce)
              at com.sun.corba.se.internal.iiop.ReaderThread.run(Unknown Source)
              Does anybody have the experience? Can anybody give a hint?
              Thanks,
              Tony
              

    Hi Tony,
              Given that the thick jar works, I would classify the problem
              as a bug - not a missing feature. The thin jar is contracted
              to be just as capable as the thick jar. My guess is that
              the bug is likely in IIOP but perhaps could be in JMS.
              Contact customer support (this forum is not maintained by
              customer support). Meanwhile, you can post your info
              to the IIOP newsgroup to see if they can help.
              You asked how long it would take to fix? That depends
              on bug priority (set by the customer) and bug complexity,
              but its usually measured in days or weeks (not months).
              You can speed up the process by giving support your
              logs and stack traces, as well as a simple reproducer,
              and telling them you are willing to try out a prototype
              patch. But before going through extra trouble, just give
              them the logs/stack traces, in case it is a known issue
              for which there is already a fix or there is a fix in progress.
              Tom
              tony yang wrote:
              > Tom:
              >
              > Thanks,
              > We actually use t3. However, in terms of weblogic 8.1 doc, t3 transparently
              > uses iopp. So t3 or iopp both fails over VPN connection.
              >
              > After replacing with full weblogic jar as you suggested, it works.
              >
              > However, we really want the thin client because we have huge amount of client
              > deployments.
              >
              > The other developers here also noticed other problems beside JMS problem
              > when using VPN connection and thin client jars.
              >
              > We guess full weblogic.jar uses real t3 instead of iiop.
              >
              > Seems that iiop does not work well over VPN connection.
              >
              > Could you give some estimate of when we can have the new thin client jars
              > to support VPN connection (even not official release)?
              >
              > Tony
              >
              > Tom Barnes <[email protected]> wrote:
              >
              >>Hi Tony,
              >>
              >>At first glance I don't know what is going on, and can only
              >>make some random suggestions. Perhaps try
              >>the t3 protocol (rather than iiop protocol) if you are using iiop
              >>URLs to connect to JMS. If you are using the new 8.1 thin
              >>client jars, try switching back and using full jar instead.
              >>Perhaps try posting to the IIOP newsgroup.
              >>
              >>Tom, BEA
              >>
              >>tony yang wrote:
              >>
              >>
              >>>I also have the log from weblogic server:
              >>>
              >>>weblogic.jms.dispatcher.DispatcherException: Could not register a HeartbeatMoni
              >>>orListener for [weblogic.iiop.IIOPRemoteRef@745152c4] for weblogic.jms.C:dal603
              >>>t05:rcy:-l91
              >>> at weblogic.jms.dispatcher.DispatcherWrapperState.addPeerGoneListener(D
              >>>spatcherWrapperState.java:563)
              >>> at weblogic.jms.dispatcher.DispatcherManager.dispatcherAdd(DispatcherMa
              >>>ager.java:106)
              >>> at weblogic.jms.dispatcher.DispatcherManager.addDispatcherReference(Dis
              >>>atcherManager.java:196)
              >>> at weblogic.jms.frontend.FEConnectionFactory.connectionCreateInternal(F
              >>>ConnectionFactory.java:413)
              >>> at weblogic.jms.frontend.FEConnectionFactory.connectionCreateRequest(FE
              >>>onnectionFactory.java:385)
              >>> at weblogic.jms.frontend.FEConnectionFactory_WLSkel.invoke(Unknown
              >>
              >>Sour
              >>
              >>>e)
              >>> at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef.invoke(BasicServerRef.java:466)
              >>> at weblogic.rmi.cluster.ReplicaAwareServerRef.invoke(ReplicaAwareServer
              >>>ef.java:108)
              >>> at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef$1.run(BasicServerRef.java:409)
              >>> at weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(Authenticat
              >>>dSubject.java:353)
              >>> at weblogic.security.service.SecurityManager.runAs(SecurityManager.java
              >>>144)
              >>>@
              >>>
              >>>
              >>>"tony yang" <[email protected]> wrote:
              >>>
              >>>
              >>>>Hi:
              >>>>
              >>>> We have used JMS topic on weblogic 7.x and we use both LAN and
              >>>>VPN connection.
              >>>> However, when we switch to weblogic 8.1, although it works fine
              >>>>when using
              >>>>LAN connection,
              >>>>it does not work when using VPN connection. We tried three different
              >>>>machines,
              >>>>got the same
              >>>>error.
              >>>> The error is:
              >>>>
              >>>>weblogic.jms.common.JMSException: Error creating connection on the
              >>
              >>server
              >>
              >>>> at weblogic.jms.client.JMSConnectionFactory.createConnectionInternal(JMS
              >>>>ConnectionFactory.java:160)
              >>>> at weblogic.jms.client.JMSConnectionFactory.createTopicConnection(JMSCon
              >>>>nectionFactory.java:95)
              >>>> at com.dynamex.decs.common.jms.DecsSubscriber.initialize(DecsSubscriber.
              >>>>java:59)
              >>>> at com.dynamex.decs.client.orderentry.swing.OrderEntry.initRMI(OrderEntr
              >>>>y.java:1714)
              >>>> at com.dynamex.decs.client.orderentry.swing.OrderEntry.<init>(OrderEntry
              >>>>.java:124)
              >>>> at com.dynamex.decs.client.orderentry.swing.OrderEntry.main(OrderEntry.j
              >>>>ava:3180)
              >>>>Caused by: java.rmi.MarshalException: CORBA COMM_FAILURE 1398079697
              >>
              >>No;
              >>
              >>>>nested
              >>>>e
              >>>>xception is:
              >>>> org.omg.CORBA.COMM_FAILURE: vmcid: SUN minor code: 209 completed:
              >>>>No
              >>>>
              >>>> at com.sun.corba.se.internal.iiop.ShutdownUtilDelegate.mapSystemExceptio
              >>>>n(Unknown Source)
              >>>> at javax.rmi.CORBA.Util.mapSystemException(Unknown Source)
              >>>> at weblogic.jms.frontend._FEConnectionFactoryRemote_Stub.connectionCreat
              >>>>eRequest(_FEConnectionFactoryRemote_Stub.java:106)
              >>>> at weblogic.jms.client.JMSConnectionFactory.createConnectionInternal(JMS
              >>>>ConnectionFactory.java:139)
              >>>> ... 5 more
              >>>>Caused by: org.omg.CORBA.COMM_FAILURE: vmcid: SUN minor code: 209
              >>>>completed:
              >>>>No
              >>>> at com.sun.corba.se.internal.iiop.IIOPConnection.purge_calls(Unknown
              >>>>Sou
              >>>>rce)
              >>>> at com.sun.corba.se.internal.iiop.MessageMediator.handleInput(Unknown
              >>>>So
              >>>>urce)
              >>>> at com.sun.corba.se.internal.iiop.messages.MessageBase.callback(Unknown
              >>>>Source)
              >>>> at com.sun.corba.se.internal.iiop.MessageMediator.processRequest(Unknown
              >>>>Source)
              >>>> at com.sun.corba.se.internal.iiop.IIOPConnection.processInput(Unknown
              >>>>So
              >>>>urce)
              >>>> at com.sun.corba.se.internal.iiop.ReaderThread.run(Unknown Source)
              >>>>
              >>>>
              >>>> Does anybody have the experience? Can anybody give a hint?
              >>>>
              >>>> Thanks,
              >>>>
              >>>>Tony
              >>>
              >>>
              >
              

  • Time Capsule firmware upgrade interfering with VPN connection?

    I regularly connect to our corporate VPN with my (corporate, non-Apple) laptop through wi-fi through our Time Capsule.  I think that the recent firmware upgrade to the Time Capsule has made it impossible for me to connect to the VPN.  My IT department suggests that the upgrade may have tightened a security setting that is preventing the VPN connection.  Is this something others have experienced?  Is there anything to do about it?  (At the moment, I am connecting to the VPN through my iPhone as a hotspot, but I'll use up my data allowance if I keep doing that.)

    Yes, it is common.. Apple only bother to check their software requirements.. not everybody elses.
    VPN in particular seems to suffer from being killed off on about every second firmware revision. Woopss forget about that..
    Is there anything to do about it? 
    Absolutely.. take your TC back to the last firmware that worked.. a Gen1 I would strongly recommend 7.5.2 but 7.6.1 is not bad.. avoid the rest.
    Downgrade firmware is easy in v6 utiity.
    Click on the version number with the option key held down.. lo and behold.. all the old versions will appear .. pick a goodun and it will proceed to downgrade that is an upgrade in functionality.. at least as far as your VPN is concerned.. very little else is going to be affected.
    V6 utility does allow you to turn off checking for updates .. I just found it.
    On the top menu area open preferences for airport utility..
    Uncheck the first two items.. check for updates and check for updates weekly.
    Do not even dream that this will stop it complaining about updates.. because it will still manage to complain.. but less often.. and you MUST ignore it.. for your own good.
    Are you sure your port forwarding is still functional and is the laptop or whatever you are using getting the right IP. If IP changes the VPN will no longer work.. but I think port forwarding has become more problematic as v6 utility has made it harder.
    Sometimes as part of this process you should also factory reset.. old firmware or new firmware and redo the port forwards again.
    It is also much easier to simply use a router that understands vpn.
    https://discussions.apple.com/message/22978735#22978735

  • Nokia C7 - Problem with VPN Connection over WLAN

    Hello,
    today I installed Nokia VPN Client 44.01(5) for Belle.
    Before this update I used the following configuration: I set two SIP-profiles up and for each profile a own VPN-connection. One for connecting over radio and one for connecting over WLAN or hotspots.
    So over all I had three kinds of connections or connection groups to choose: "Internet" with the radio and home wlan connections, "Intranet" for the VPN-connection over radio and "Intranet over WLAN" for VPN-connections over other WLANs.
    The advantage of this configuration was that I could use the SIP-profile depending on my location and the phone had not to use the "standard" VPN-connection ("Intranet") over radio.
    Now after the update I have the problem that I can't connect to my VPN over WLAN at all. Not with the SIP profile and not manually over the internet browser. There is always the notification "Connection Problem".
    I tried also to put the "VPN over WLAN access point" from the "Intranet over WLAN"-group to the "Intranet"-group and gave it the first priority, but that doesn't helped too.
    Does someone of you had or have the same kind of problem or otherwise has any clue about that?
    Any help is very much appreciated!
    Thank you in advance! I hope that I described my problem clearly.
    Greetings
    unsys

    testing with the faceplate removed and into the master socket witha brand new filters result's below . I tried the quiet line test and it seems silent so no issues there. Can anyone see an issue, I've posted the noise results etc as well with the faceplate removed. (using a butter knife cause i'm just out of bed and tools are in the garage!)
    0.7 Mbps
    0 Mbps
    1 Mbps Max Achievable Speed
    Download speedachieved during the test was - 0.7 Mbps For your connection, the acceptable range of speeds is 0.2 Mbps-1 Mbps. Additional Information: Your DSL Connection Rate :1.06 Mbps(DOWN-STREAM), 0.45 Mbps(UP-STREAM) IP Profile for your line is - 0.75 Mbps
    System Up Time 00:11:28
    Port
    Status
    TxPkts
    RxPkts
    Collisions
    Tx B/s
    Rx B/s
    Up Time
    WAN
    PPPoA
    6657
    9689
    0
    2806
    19425
    00:10:58
    LAN
    10M/100M
    28652
    22350
    0
    22356
    5418
    00:11:24
    WLAN
    11M/54M/300M
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    00:11:11
    ADSL Link
    Downstream
    Upstream
    Connection Speed
    1056 kbps
    448 kbps
    Line Attenuation
    49.0 db
    27.0 db
    Noise Margin
    10.6 db
    20.0 db

  • Issues with vpn connection thru ATT DSL

    Hi I hope someone can help me out...
    At work we use Cysco VPN Client Verstion 4.8.02.0010
    Everyone (about 18 people) can connect to it from their homes. For some reason I am the only member who can not connect.
    I am tryihg to connect Via ATT DSL and Cysco VPN Client shows that I am connected, however,
    I have no access to any of the networks from work.
    I have tried connecting using Cox Cable from a friend's home and it connects just fine.
    I have read many threads online that indicate that this is a common occurance with ATT DSL users but I have not found
    the fix.
    I am using modem/router type 2701 HG-B
    Any feedback will be greatly appreciated.
    Thank you,

    Make sure the encrytpion and parameters such as VPN group are negtotiated properly between the client and the server. Refer http://cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk583/tk372/technologies_tech_note09186a00800949c5.shtml for most commonly occuring VPN issues . Contact ATT for configuring their servers.

  • Puzzler... Cant access RRAS with VPN connected client

    I have a series of 4 VMs running server 2012 r2;
    dc- my domain and wsus server
    rds- my remote desktop server for remoteapps, RRAS for connecting to VPN
    sql- sql server for database needed for one of the apps published
    av- hosts kaspersky and manages backups
    So, I have a VPN set up through RRAS and am connecting with it and all is well.  I can ping every computer on the network EXCEPT the rds server.  I can ping from the rds server to the vpn client.
    I am trying to use a remote app over the vpn but the remote app is unable to reach the rds server. 
    Does something have to be setup manually to loopback traffic to the rds server when it is coming in on the same server through RRAS?
    Any insight would be appreciated!
    Matt

    Hi,
    According to your description, my understanding is that rds installed RRAS and configured it as VPN server, VPN client successfully ping internal clients, but failed to ping the VPN server.
    Are there 2 NICs on the VPN server? One connects to internal and another connects to external?
    In general, a ping packet is sent by the client from its own IP address to the external IP address of VPN server, it will be unpacked once the VPN server receives it, and the VPN server will dispatch this pack due to the internal IP address. So, if this
    packet is sent to the VPN server, when it unpack the packet and find it is sent to itself, the VPN server should reply to this packet.
    You may try to turn off firewall/anti-virus software temporally, and then check to see if it can successfully ping. Besides, use a monitoring tool(Network Monitor, Wireshark ) to
    capture packets on both client and VPN server, check to see if the packets are sent/answered to the correctly destination.
    Best Regards,
    Eve Wang
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

  • RV320 problem with VPN connect (BUG)

    forgive for bad English
    Today I bought and I adjusted RV320, at once I saw some problems.
    Firmware last
    1. I adjusted two VPN tunnels between RV320 and two RV-082
    also I saw what not one tunnel in Web panel not connect.
    I many times pressed, the condition didn't change!
    Having made Ping on 192.168.1.1 computers in a network 192.168.1.0 I saw answers:
    it is simple a miracle or huge BUG.
    2 The second BUG, VPN tunel No. 2 doesn't work in general as don't kick. And before there was RV-042G and RV-82 and everything was OK
    From log:
    2013-08-29, 21:47:28
    VPN Log
    [g2gips1]: cmd=down-client peer=78.31.177.145 peer_client=192.168.2.0/24 peer_client_net=192.168.2.0 peer_client_mask=255.255.255.0
    2013-08-29, 21:47:28
    VPN Log
    ip route del 192.168.2.0/24 via 178.216.123.65 dev eth1 metric 35
    2013-08-29, 21:47:28
    VPN Log
    iptables -t nat -D vpn -s 192.168.0.0/24 -d 192.168.2.0/24 -j ACCEPT
    2013-08-29, 21:47:28
    VPN Log
    iptables -t nat -D vpn -s 192.168.2.0/24 -d 192.168.0.0/24 -j ACCEPT
    2013-08-29, 21:47:28
    VPN Log
    iptables -t nat -D vpn_postrouting -s 192.168.0.0/24 -d 192.168.2.0/24 -j ACCEPT
    2013-08-29, 21:47:28
    VPN Log
    iptables -t nat -D vpn_postrouting -o eth0 -s 192.168.2.0/24 -d 192.168.0.0/24 -j ACCEPT
    2013-08-29, 21:47:37
    VPN Log
    [g2gips1] #14: [Tunnel Established] sent MR3, ISAKMP SA established
    2013-08-29, 21:47:38
    VPN Log
    [g2gips1]: cmd=up-client peer=78.31.177.145 peer_client=192.168.2.0/24 peer_client_net=192.168.2.0 peer_client_mask=255.255.255.0
    2013-08-29, 21:47:38
    VPN Log
    ip route add 192.168.2.0/24 via 178.216.123.65 dev eth1 metric 35
    2013-08-29, 21:47:38
    VPN Log
    iptables -t nat -I vpn -s 192.168.0.0/24 -d 192.168.2.0/24 -j ACCEPT
    2013-08-29, 21:47:38
    VPN Log
    iptables -t nat -I vpn -s 192.168.2.0/24 -d 192.168.0.0/24 -j ACCEPT
    2013-08-29, 21:47:38
    VPN Log
    iptables -t nat -I vpn_postrouting -s 192.168.0.0/24 -d 192.168.2.0/24 -j ACCEPT
    2013-08-29, 21:47:38
    VPN Log
    iptables -t nat -I vpn_postrouting -o eth0 -s 192.168.2.0/24 -d 192.168.0.0/24 -j ACCEPT
    2013-08-29, 21:47:38
    VPN Log
    [g2gips1] #15: [Tunnel Established] IPsec SA established {ESP=>0x102b2557 < 0xc23b7d0f}
    What problem i'm undersdund.
    3 The third BUG, adding or changing VPN tunnels, against for a second there is a form for addition of the new tunnel, why it? ? ?

    A little later...
    I solved reset all settings to default and to adjust from scratch, all work. 
    What is done? I don't understand.

  • Internet stops with PPTP VPN connections to ASUS RT-N66U VPN Router

    I have a client with a small office network that has a few people working remotely from Windows 7 and 8 PCs. As an inexpensive solution the client opted to use a VPN router (ASUS RT-N66U) that supports PPTP so remote users could access the shared
    files and SQL DB server. 
    The VPN connectivity for one client was working fine and then stopped working altogether so when the VPN connection is established all Internet and VPN access is stopped. This was especially troubling for me since I work remotely and cannot test or debug after
    the VPN session has been connected. I checked the error logs and found nothing. Also there had been no new programs installed. And finally, I ran a full system antivirus scan with no issues found.
    In case you are facing a similar issue, before trying something remotely that may not work, use the shutdown with reboot command in a COMMAND window and set a timer for something like 3 minutes to reboot in case you get stuck. (e.g. shutdown -r -t 180). 
    Problem: The two symptoms of the VPN connection failure are:
    1) All Internet browsing stops working locally 
    2) No data can pass through the VPN tunnel
    I created a virtual machine on my local network and replicated the client's environment. I experimented with nearly every setting in the VPN dialogue until and came to the final solution. 
    Solution: For the VPN adapter on the remote machines I configured DNS settings and used the remote as the default gateway.
    * VPN adapter Networking IPV4 Properties for:
    - DNS server 1: Main Office VPN Router IP Address
    - DNS server 2: A public DNS server (Google is 8.8.8.8)
    - I also checked the box to "register this connection addresses in DNS"
    Note: Perhaps the local router would also have worked and DNS2 but I didn't test it.
    I have documented this because after reading and searching among many Technical articles and the Microsoft support website, I was unable to find the solution that I came up with so I hope to help someone else. 
    Question1: - Can anyone tell me why the connectivity only works when 'use default gateway on remote network' is checked?
    - I have disabled this option with some business class VPN routers and the connectivity still worked to the remote network but it does not work to the Asus router.
    Question2: From the information provided can I determine where the problem lies?
    Is it the:
    1) Remote client PC
    2) Remote client router
    3) Home office VPN router (Asus RT-N66U)
    If the true culprit cannot be determined yet, what steps do you recommend so I can isolate the true cause of the failure.
    I appreciate any help so that I can be sure my solution is valid and pass along the findings to ASUS if it is their issue.

    Thank you for the suggestion. I have successfully connected through the VPN router when the one client was unable to get VPN throughput working.
    I looked at the routing tables with and without the VPN connection established. The differences are that:
    1) when VPN is NOT active, there is a route from the local NIC IP to the Internet IP address of the local gateway
    destination 68.109.82.xx
    mask 255.255.255.0
    gateway 192.168.0.1
    interface 192.168.0.11
    metric 21
    2) when VPN IS active, the route to the Internet IP address of the local gateway is deleted and a persistent route to the VPN router local network has been added
    Persistent route:
    destination 192.168.21.0
    mask 255.255.255.0
    gateway 192.168.0.1
    interface 192.168.0.11
    metric 1

  • Network Speed Required with VPN

    Hi,
    I have a customer, he has open an office outside the main company,
    Only 2-3 user (with all authorization access to B.one) will be connected with VPN.
    I would like to Know how is the network speed required to use b.one with VPN connections.
    Thanks for your cooperation,

    Hello
    There's no specific definition for VPN.
    What we recommend based on the field experience is:
    _Terminal server_ 
    Bandwidth per user: 20 - 40 Kb
    _Citrix_
    Bandwidth per user: 5 - 20 Kb                       
    Please take these numbers as a recommendation/guideline and not as minimum requirements.
    Paulo Calado
    SAP Business One Forums Team

  • Connectivity failure when authorizing

    I've been trying to authorize my computer. First time id and first time on this computer. I consistently am met with a "connectivity failure" message despite the fact that my internet connection is working fine. I am able to login to the adobe website in order to post this - why can't I authorize my computer?

    Hallo,
    ich habe die letzten beiden Tage mit diesem Problem verbracht. Ich habe beim Chat nachgefragt, im Forum geschaut und mit dem Support telefoniert. Alles erfolglos. Dann habe ich den Virenscanner ausgeschaltet und die Firewall auch! Als es dann immer noch nicht ging, habe ich gemerkt, dass ich noch einen zweiten Virenscanner auf dem PC hatte. Nachdem ich diesen deinstalliert hatte, hat die Authorisierung geklappt.
    Ich hoffe, das hilft dir weiter!
    Viele Grüße und viel Erfolg!

  • RasClient:dialed a connection named "VPN Connection Name " which has failed. The error code returned on failure is 789 on windows 8.1

    Hello,
    i am trying to connect to my corporation VPN Server " ISA 2006" using windows 8.1 client built in VPN,  but its returned the following error:
     Event ID 20227: dialed a connection named "VPN connection Name" which has failed. The error code returned on failure is 789.
    VPN connection is working fine with windows XP and windows 7 with no issue , this error is only appear when try to connect to using windows 8 client machine.
    this error is shows only on windows 8.1 client , same procedures used to enroll the certificate from internal CA " IPsec Type" is followed .
    below are the  ISA server specifications:
    VPN Server : ISA 2006.
    windows Server version 2003. 
    appreciate your quick help and reply .
    Thanks

    Thanks for your reply.
    i would like to add another point for this case, that when we are trying to enroll a certificate from internal CA web enrollment directly using windows 8 " internet explorer 11"  , its install a certificate without Digital
    Signature and non-repudiation in key usage property, then when try to connect , its will give the above error 789 ..
    when try to enroll a certificate into windows 7 " internet explorer 10" and then export and import  this certificate into windows 8.1 machine "with the name of
    windows 8.1 machine" into windows 8.1 machine, the VPN is working normally and without issue.
    The properties of the Certificate are difference between windows 7 machine and windows 8 machine is key usage missing the Digital Signature and non-repudiation properties when enroll
    from windows  8.1 " internet explorer 11", this is in fact because of
    we don't have an option for key usage " both" when subment a certificate on web enrollment page from windows 8 machine ,, the only option available is exchange "
    no signature and both option available "
    i believe that there is something wrong when using windows 8.1 internet explorer 11 so its gave a certificate with wrong key usage property .
    appreciate your quick help in this .
    thanks

  • Hi there, I am trying to connect to my server at work from home using a vpn connection. It connects fine and the time ticks along, but when i click go - connect to server, it comes up with connection failed. Please help!

    Hi there, I am trying to connect to my server at work from home using a vpn connection. It connects fine and the time ticks along, but when i click go - connect to server, it comes up with connection failed. Please help!

    ... when i click go - connect to server, it comes up with connection failed.
    If you're trying to connect to a Bonjour server on the remote network, that won't work over a layer 3 VPN. Use something like Hamachi or one of the SSH-tunnelling Bonjour proxy apps for that.

  • I am fed up with Spring and Apple passing me off to one another and neither will fix the problem. I am unable to receive a connection on my phone.

    I am fed up with Spring and Apple passing me off to one another and neither will fix the problem. I am unable to receive a connection on my phone.
    The internet goes out and I have to reset network setting each and every time. This is only a temporary solution which by the time I release the line with Spring or leave the apple store the issue is back. Sprint indicates that it is a know issue with the Iphone 5 and apple says it is a network issue as Sprint's network is not up to par with the Iphone and can not meet the expectations on the Iphone 5.
    I have attached a few picture, as you can see it clearly says I have 5 bars and 3g available but I have no connections what so ever.
    This issue affects all data and so I can not send or receive picture messages, use apps, or access the internet. The data goes in and out intermittently and it seems the phone chooses what I can and can't do.
    For example I can watch Youtube or Vevo videos but I can not access Facebook or Instagram.
    Is anyone else having this issue?
    I will soon loose my patience....
    I have reset my phone three time and have reset network and other setting mutltiple times.

Maybe you are looking for