FI-AA: Unable to settle costs off of AUC

In Depreciation area 01 (Book Depreciation), planned/posted values were recorded on an AUC via settlement from WBS Elements during FY 2006.
In Depreciation area 80 (Insurance Values), planned/posted values were recorded on an AUC via settlement from WBS Elements during FY 2006. Planned depreciation values are calculated and post as Non-Insurable value on the AUC during FY 2006.
In FY 2007, all values posted to the associated WBS Element are journal entried off to another WBS Element and the AUC is zeroed out once the settlement from the WBS Element has posted. The Non-Insurable value has been carried forward to FY 2007 and remains on AUC.
In FY 2008, an AMR is created. Both Settlement to AMR for Current Year and Settlement to AMR for Prior Year are executed but the Non-Insurable value still remains on the AUC. This has prevented us from Closing the WBS Element and deactivating the AUC.
I'm assuming that when you execute Settlement to AMR - Prior Year that it only goes back and looks at the previous FY and not all previous years, which is why the Non-Insurable value remains on the AUC.
I need to clear this Non-Insurable value, which was posted two years ago, off the AUC so that we can Close the WBS Element. Any ideas on how to do that?
Also when it comes to AMR creation, is it common practice to create the AMR at the same time the AUC is created or at least have the AMR created by the end of the next FY? In our situation above I think if we would have created the AMR in FY 2007 and executed Settlement to AMR - Prior FY in FY 2007 we not have encountered this problem.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks for the response.
Note 425601, if I'm reading it correctly, explains how to settle costs posted in previous years from the WBS Element to an AUC.
In my situation all costs have been settled from the WBS Element. I have an AUC that has costs on it from two years ago that I don't know how to settle to an AMR. This preventing us from Closing the WBS Element.

Similar Messages

COPA: Unable to settle Cost Element

Good Morning COPA Guru's-
I am learning COPA the hard way (no formal training) and I am having trouble with a particular Cost Element 500600 not settling to COPA. It looks like everything set-up correctly. In fact, the settings are identical in the other Co.code. Our users have attempted to settle several times with no luck.
Any ideas?

Perhaps you can you give a little more detail on what you are trying to do. If you are settling an order to COPA then you need to assign a PA transfer structure to the settlement profile and maintain the transfer structure. This is not company code dependent, so if this is working for some company codes and not others, then I don't think this what you're refering to.
If you are posting an FI or MM document and want the item to also post to COPA then you need to maintain a setting in t-code OKB9 for that cost element (click the profitability segment button). This is company code specific so perhaps this what you are refering to. Also, you'll need to maintain a mapping of the cost element to a value field in the PA transfer structure (structure FI), but that is not company code depending so you should already have that.
thanks,

Table for Settlement Cost(CJI3) for a project

Hi All,
I have a requirement to develop a report for a project, in that i got a req. to find out the settlement cost for a project.
we have standard report CJI3 to find the settel cost for a project but I am unable to debug the program as it use logical databases(PSJ).
Please advise me and let me know any table or Function module exists for same.
Regards,
Venkat

Hi,
The table /s you are looking for could be one of these;
RPSCO Project info database: Costs, Revenues, Finances
COSP: Cost Object: Cost totals for external postings
COSS: Cost totals for internal postings
COSB:Total variances
COBK:Document header
COEP: Line items
You may need more than one table to meet your requirements.
Pl confirm, if useful.
regards
Muraleedharan.R
091 9880028904

My ipod touch has a usb cable picture with an arrow pointingto the itunes logo. the ipod will not connect to a computer and is unable to be turned off as there is no red power slider when the powerbutton is pressed. what can i do to fix this?

my ipod touch has a usb cable picture with an arrow pointing to the itunes logo. the ipod will not connect to a computer and is unable to be turned off as there is no red power slider when the power button is pressed. what can i do to fix this?

Try:
- iOS: Not responding or does not turn on
- Also try DFU mode after try recovery mode
How to put iPod touch / iPhone into DFU mode « Karthik's scribblings
- If not successful and you can't fully turn the iOS device fully off, let the battery fully drain. After charging for an least an hour try the above again.
- Try on another computer
- If still not successful that usually indicates a hardware problem and an appointment at the Genius Bar of an Apple store is in order.
Apple Retail Store - Genius Bar

KO88 - Error when settling for Cost Center AND Auc for the same Internal Or

Hi Experts,
We need to configure Investment Internal Orders that could settle to both Cost Center and Auc, but each assignments with different Source Cost Elements
We did the following:
1. Created Auc Class
2. Created Investment Profile "IMOBIL" and assigned to Auc Class, flagging Auc
3. Created Allocation Structure "CV" with two assignments:
01, Source = Cost elements 7000000000 to 7999999999, receiver AUC "by cost element"
02 Source = Cost elements 4000000000 to 4999999999, receiver CTR "by cost element"
4. Created Model Order, filling the Investment Profile IMOBIL created in step 2.
5 Created Settlement Profile ZCV0001, assigning Allocation Strucutre CV, allowing CTR and AUC for receivers, default receiver is "FXA", doc type "AA".
6 Created ORder Type CV01, assigning Settlement Profile ZCV0001.
When I post only for Asset Expenses (Source Cost element 7, Assigment 01), the settlement through KO88 correctly settles to AUC, and also creates the settlement rule for cost center (i'm using the strategy to create from Responsible Cost Center).
But when I post for Asset Expenses (cost elements 7, receiver AUC) AND General Expenses (Source Cost element 4, receiver CTR), KO88 generates an error KD506, saying that for Assigment 02 - AUC I didnt define a settlement cost element.
1. Assignment 02 is not AUC, is CTR;
2. I flagged "by cost element", so I don't need a settlement cost element. And also, I was able to post to AUC when the source posting was only for cost element 7.
Did you face any problem like this?
I cannot find out what is the missing configuration, or if it is a program error...
Kind Regards
Mayumi Blak

Hi Ajay
I already created Source Structure and assigned to my Setllement profile (so I assigned Allocation Structure AND Source Structure).
I don't understand when you say that I need to assign the Source Sutrcture in each rule....because the Source structure is in the Settlement Parameters valid for both rules...
When I post to Asset Expenses only for the internal Order, the 2 rules (CTR and AUC) are created when I run KO88 (but only AUC rule is settled). This is OK.
The problem is when I post for both General Expenses AND Asset Expenses, the system is not recognizing that I have 2 source structures, neither is findind that for CTR AND AUC the Settlement cost elements are the original cost elements.
I'm thinking about changing message KD506 to warning, do you know if this can help?
Kind Regards
Mayumi Blak

Internal Order Report S_ALR_87012993 showing settled cost

HI ,
The issue here is related to IO report S_ALR_87012993 showing up settled cost against a particular Cost Element/GL account. However when we use the drill down function it says "No actual Line Item exist". I have checked the line item details for that particular GL account which does not have any posting to it with the said IO and moreover no FI Posting is done to that GL account during that relevant period. Hence the IO report is showing up variance .
I have checked the Settlement documents for that period for the said IO (Table AUAK ) through Transaction Code KOB8 , but none of these settlement indicates that particular Cost element/GL Account.
I have executed KOB1 which does not show up any line item with the said combination.
Any idea why the system /report showing up such settlement to that particular Cost Element/GL account which does not have any Actual Line Item posted with that particular IO.
Regards
Jaydip

This is very very strange. Are you sure is not facing some profile problems to view information ?
KOB1 and S_ALR_87012993 have the same information: actual.
When you run settlement, it goes to inventory delivery account or to wip account depends on order status.
Sometimes people set a different account for settlement.
Check the balance account in transaction FS10N/FBL3N it must be the same because FI and CO are balanced for this account.
Regards

WBS element is updated while settling cost from WBS to AUC

Hi Experts
At the time of settlement , when we settling the cost from WBS to AUC , WBS element is updated in AUC line item of accounting document , but it should not be updated actually.
As result AUC cost is loaded on WBS and budget of WBS is get affected , furthermore system is not allowing for MIGO even budget is available but in CJ30 it is showing assigned value is more then original budget.
Please suggest.
Thanks & Regards
shailesh

Hi Saurabh ,
I totally agree with you , but in our case system is not allowing(Error Message: Budget Exceeded) MIGO against capex PO - > WBS.
Note : in our case , system is checking budget at the time of MIGO also.
in our case , report S_ALR_87013558 is showing wrong actual value and also in CJ30 , total assigned value is larger then total distributable budget , As result our available budget gets negative figure in report S_ALR_87013558 , even i have already run CJEN->CJBN 2 or 3 times.
Note: Our Commitment value is correct.
Actually , according to report S_ALR_87013542 , system is showing correct actual value , that means we have sufficient available budget for further MIGO's
Now may be , due to WBS element is updated in AUC line item of accouning document of settlement (WBS to AUC) , system loads AUC values to WBS unnecessarily , our available budget gets negative figure.
For your reference , i am attaching screen shot of accounting document which is generated at the time of settlement from WBS to AUC.

TX CNS41 - settled cost from internal order to WBS element not displayed

Hi PS Expets,
I have a question regarding transaction CNS41 "Structure Overview" where cost settled from an internal order is not displayed in in the report for a selected project. This is in a ECC version 5.0
Settled costs from internal orders are posted with transaction type KOAO on WBS elements and when you check report RCNSTFCO you can see that the following transaction types are deselected when executing transaction CNS41:
delete t_rpsco_m where vorga = 'KOAO' "<   insert
                      or vorga = 'KOAL' "<   insert
                      or vorga = 'KOAP' "<   insert
                      or vorga = 'KOAQ' "<   insert
                      or vorga = 'KOAR'."<   insert
CALL FUNCTION 'HFPM_RPSCO_TO_RPSCO_LIS_CONV'
This is implemented according to OSS note 51971 in order to eliminate internal business volume in the project structure when executing a PS hierarchy report.
But this also eliminate the display of the cost from the internal order.
Any ideas or a work around in order to display settled cost from an internal order on a WBS element in transaction CNS41
Kind regards,
Anne

Hello Tison.
I guess you have the Project created with a BAPI in your system in background. As far as I have seen I'd try the following in ABAP to create Partners in the Project Definition: BAPI_BUS2001_PARTNER_CREATE_M or the corresponding method ProjectDefinitionPI.PartnerCreateMultiple. This should happen in background when the Project is created also.
Best regards.
Jens Schmid

My iphone 4s' screen is black, but it's still on and charging. I broke my lock screen button so I am unable to turn it off using the home button and lock button. Is there any other way my phone can restart or turn off ? Is my phone broken for sure?

My iphone 4s' screen is black, but it's still on and charging. I broke my lock screen button so I am unable to turn it off using the home button and lock button. Is there any other way my phone can restart or turn off ? Is my phone broken for sure?

Kbkohn wrote:
I am in tears right now because I entered all my 11month old sons milestones into my phone and now I have nothing I'm so upset and am hoping there is a way to get this information back.
Most intelligent people would not store such sensitive data on a device that could so easily be lost, stolen, or damaged. Even if they chose to do so, they would use the device as designed and regularly sync and backup that device as described in the User's Guide.
Have you done so? If you have, all of the data is either in iCloud or iTunes on your computer. Replace the device and restore the new iDevice with the backup of the old one.

Report for settled costs of product cost collectors

Friends,
Is there any report where i can see all the settled costs for cost collector for previous period. I can see individual costs through KKBC_PKO but i need one for all the cost collectors in one report.

Sridhar,
As always you got a answer. Thanks. i tried this before but missed running KKRV before this. Now this is good.

Settling the WBS element costs to an AuC

Please Explain the procedure for settling the WBS element costs to an AuC & then to asset?

Hi,
Please follow the below sequence of steps for this:
1) For WBS element where the asset has to be created, AUC willbe created automatically when the WBS element is in release status to get this investment profile should be assigned to WBS element in Control Tab
2) You can see in the system status show as AUC to see the AUC number follow the path
EDIT-> WBS element -> Investment program--> Asset under Construction where you can see the AUC which is created automatically
3) Once the above two steps are through, for settlement to AuC goto transaction CJ88 give the WBS element number select the processing type as partial captalization and execute all the costs pertaining to that. WBS elements will be automatically settled to the AUC which is created for that WBS element
Thanks,
Prithwiraj.

Define a settlement cost element for receiver type FXA

Hi,
While settling the AUC internal order,i am gettingg the below error.Kindly advice me
Define a settlement cost element for receiver type FXA
Message no. KD506
Diagnosis
In allocation structure A1 (controlling area AFCO), you did not define which cost element should be used when settling costs/revenues of the sender. Nor did you define receiver type FXA.
Procedure
Assign a different allocation structure to the settlement sender (-> Master data -> Settlement rule -> Goto -> Settlement parameters), or maintain allocation structure A1.
Thanks
Supriya

Hi Supriya,
Go to SPRO-> Controlling > Internal orders>Actual postings>Settlement> Maintain Allocation structures & choose A1 and go to assignment, select the relevant category like raw material / consumption and then go to source, check the range of cost elements first then click the settlement cos t element and under that choose FXA and define the settlement cost element which must be created under 22 category.
After maintainig the above, you will not get the error anymore.
Thanks & Regards
Anuj Agarwal

WBS settled cost in sales order

Hi,
We settlele the WBS to Sales order and where we can see the settled cost in sales order.
Kindly suggest.
Thanks,

Dear Sudha,
You can check if the costs are transferred from WBS element in CJI3 (you will see a credit posting for the WBS element)
You can check if the costs are debited to the Sales Order using KVBI (you wlll see a debit posting for the Sales Order item)
Note: Cost elements that you see could be a settlement cost element /original cost element based on the allocation structure used.
Kind Regards
Umapathi G

Settlement cost of an order

Hi friends,
Is there any way i see the settlement cost in any of the reports?
In IW39 i am able to get the settlement cost in the report but the cost is shown as zero.
Is there any other standard report available.
Thanks in advance
Regards
Vivek

Hii Vivek
You can also refer the following forum question.
[Settlement of PM Order|Settlement of PM Order]
Regards
Makarand Gurjar

Settled Cost still shows in Reports

Dear Consultants
I have settled 50 % cost from WBS element to Cost Center and in reports it shows all the 100% cost on that WBS element. Can anyone please tell me how I can show only the remaining 50% of cost in report and not the settled cost. If there any particular report or setting..please help me
Asif

Pls check whether 50% settled cost showing is in statistical form. cost element catagory 99/ value type 11.
if it is so, customise the value catagory settings as per SAP note 676123. refer section 1b.
you can block the update to table rpsco.
also refer note 328203
hope this helps you.

FI-AA: Unable to settle costs off of AUC

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for