FI Entries during transfer posting

Hi,
We have a requirement to post some FI entries like custom duty during transfer posting from one location to another location
( For example - Bonded warehouse location to regular warehouse location). Is there a way to achieve this?
Please help.
Thanks

Hi,
As per your requirement, there is one Bonded Warehouse and a Plant. To movethe materials from bonded to plant you need to capture customs duty and you need to post that.
One of the way is to create the Bonded warehouse as plant and from your plant you can create STO, by doing this you can ableto generate necessary document to move the goods from bonded warehouse to your plant ans also it is easy to capture the duties and freight cahrges etc.
Thanks,
JK

Similar Messages

Storage bin does not exist error when during transfer posting in MB1B

Hello All,
I am getting the error message " Storage bin [WH no, Storage type] does not exist Check your entry" during transfer posting in MB1B from one storage location to another for ex 0007 to 0001. But i can able to do transfer posting from 0001 to 0007 without any error.
Please provide your solutions/suggestions
Thanks
Benny

Benny Sampath wrote:
Here is the error message "Storage bin 56A 870 does not exist (check your entry)"
>
> Thanks
> Benny
I can only see 2 values instead of the expected 3.
what is 56A ? is it bin, warehouse or storage type?
what is 870 ? is it bin, warehouse or storage type?
one variable that is need to have a hit in table LAGP is missing, hence you get this error.
you have to find out why this variable is missing.
But there is a wide area to look. Hence you should first answer the questions, as this would limit the options where to look.

Automatic batch determination during transfer posting. Issue.

Hi All,
Please could anyone advise to solve the following problem with automatic batch determination:
1. When delivery is created for sales order, SAP automatically assigns batch number.(SLOC 1)
2. From time to time there is a need to transfer the same material number, which is on delivery to another sloc2.
3. Using Mb1b tcode i do transfer posting from SLOC1 to SLOC 2. In batch field i put * or (**) for automatic generation. (movement 311).
The problem appears here, when SAP automatically assigns the same batch to transfer posting which was assigned to delivery (p.1).
So that after transfer posting done, there is no required quantity left in batch needed to do a goods issue for delivery. So goods issue is not possible because of that kind of transfer posting.
Do you have any idea, how to manage this, and to restrict SAP choosing the same batch which was assigned to delivery.
Thank you,
Kind Regards.

There are 3 strategy types setup in MBC3 (1, 2)
ME01, ME02 which are standart SAP.
And one started from Z* with settings below:
Plnt
Valid From
Valid to
Delet.Ind.
No. split
Cpl.change
OnlineBdet
UnitofMeas
MProposal
Selection
Sort seq.
AAAA
04.01.2006
31.12.9999
099
X
B
001
X
X
|
Date of last goods receipt
ascending
Kind Regards,
Andrey

Authorization during transfer posting plant to plnt

Hello,
We have implemented a new development for our client. The new
development basically is as follows: we have created a new movement,
called 993, as a copy of mov.type 303. For the new movement we have
implemented that plant, storage and batch are required. Previous ly our
client usually is working with mov. type 303(this mov. only works with
plant, not required storage location). The problem we have is with
authorisation, on the authorisation object: M_MSEG_WWA.
After the creation on new mov. type, 993, we have the error e120, on
the plant. The authorisation for the users that is working with this
movements only required one plant, for example XXXX. With new mov.we
need the authorisation for a plant YYYY, and this cause a problem for
customer, because the users could make movement forbidden in the othe
plant YYYY.
I have checked sap note 45243, and this is the really problem. The
solution is modify the standard program, or must be another possible
solution.

Hi
If you cant find a standart solution you can control it with user exit.
For example you can use the include ZXMBCU02
with your parameters to control
i_mseg_werks eq 'YYYY'
i_mseg-bwart = '993' or i_mseg-bwart = '994'
sy-uname ='USERNAME' etc.
Hope will help
Best Regards

Transfer posting of split valuated materials

Hi guys,
During transfer posting (mvt type 311,313 and 315 )of split valuated materials valuvation type should not be changed by user , please suggest how to do this?
thanks and regards
Thamizhchelvan G

I am curious.
Is you material batch managed or do you use split valuation without batch management?
What happens if the user changes the valuation type? I expect a warning or even an error message.
do you get accoutning documents then?

Transfer Posting Issue through MB1B

Hi,
We have a requirement that During Transfer Posting of Material through MB1B transaction, User should be able to transfer the Stock within SAME Material Code (From Material A to Material A, but in diff. Plant)...
If User want to Transfer the Stock of A Material to B Material, system should not allow the same...
Please guide...

SAP~MM wrote:
> But If, we want to Transfer the Stock to another Plant with same material code, then by which movement type we can do it..
>
> Please guide...
MVMT type : 301 Transfer posting plant to plant in one step
The quantity is transferred from unrestricted-use stock in the issuing plant to unrestricted-use stock in the receiving plant.
Possible special stock indicators: O, V, W
MVMT type : 303 Transfer posting plant to plant in two steps - removal from storage
The quantity is transferred from unrestricted-use stock of the issuing plant to stock in transfer in the receiving plant.
For technical reasons, you cannot carry out transfer postings from plant to plant in two steps for split-valuation materials.
Removal from storage can be posted via an SD delivery.

Delivery challan in transfer posting

Hello SAP Gurus,
I am transfering material from my store to a project.
A delivery challan needs to be created and sent along with this material.
How to create a delivery challan (What is the transaction) and how can I assign external number range to delivery challans.
Kindly help
Thanks and Regards
Prabhjot Singh Nayyar

Hi Kunal,
Vendor field is never filled at the time of transfer posting.
Once we do sub contracting , then after giving sub contrctng vendor name, in grid it will be displayed under "vendor transfer posting" field.
My question is when this vendor field will be filled during Transfer posting.
Uts
Edited by: Utsav.agra on May 6, 2009 11:27 AM

WM- WM stock (quality) to not activated storage loc-Transfer Posting issue

hi friends
I Have a error during transfer posting (321 mov type). After quality inspection the stock is rejected . so i have to move to WM not
activated Storage location. After transfer posting, TR is generated From material document. then iam trying to create to transfer order , but i have the error
System cannot find source storage bin
Message no. L3 008
Diagnosis
The system was not able to determine a source storage bin for this material.
This problem can be caused for several reasons:
1. The material no longer exists in your warehouse.
2. The material is in your warehouse, but currently cannot be reached by the system (for example, the material is just being transferred by one of the conveyor machines).
3. The material is in your warehouse, but not in the storage type and storage areas that are defined in your system for the material search.
Procedure
Check to see if the material really exists in your warehouse.
If the reason for the error is the third one mentioned above, contact your system administrator
Our bussiness is
lXRM storage location is WM activated
lXA   storage location is not WM activated
1. create PO
2.GRN- Quality Inspection
3 If ok Means Stock is move to lXRM
    If not ok Means Stock is move to lXA.
my queries is i want to move quality stock (WM) to not activated storage location.
with regards
dinesh

hi friends
                 thanks for response,
1. create PO
2.GRN- Quality Inspection,* Initially i GRN receipt LXRA Storage location
3 If ok Means Good Stock is move to lXRM. (storage location)
If not ok Means Bad Stock is move to lXA.(storage location)
we have not quality module, once do the Migo the manually the assign quality inspection(STOCK TYPE). After quality inspection
done, Then do the 321 mov type user should decide some good quantity move to unrestricted stock LXRM (Storage
location) ,some bad quantity move to the scrap storage location (lXA) .
*STORAGE LOCATION LXA is not activated WM
My request is, i want to move to the Scrap location (LXA). after 321 movement type done, TR is generated then i am trying to do the transfer order . system is not accepted , iam getting error
wiht regards
dinesh
Edited by: code acess on Aug 27, 2011 4:45 AM
Edited by: code acess on Aug 27, 2011 4:46 AM

Transfer Posting Storage location

Dear friends
can anybody tell me that can we add freight cost ( transpotation cost on material )
During transfer posting from one Storage location to other storage location
how can we do it what setting we need to do it ?
full poinst will be rewarded !!!
thanks in advance

but client is presently doing it in NON-SAP because both storage location are at different place in same plant
we have to do it in SAP
suggest me
thnaks

Transfer posting during invoicing

Hi Experts,
Please refer the spreadsheet enclosed for your reference. I would like to add that we are using India localization in our project.
Issues:
During Invoice posting the system is forcing us to maintain GL account determination for main transaction 0250
In case Late payment charges in previous invoice is paid/cleared – no issues (Inv # :9100001584 Doc#: 10000002837 Dt:05-08-2013 Amount: 9.53)
In case Late payment charges in previous invoice is open then system automatically clears the past late payment charge using main/sub 0620/0010 and posts the same as Rec. Transf. Posting Invoicing using main transaction 0250/0020.
Is there any way to stop this as its unnecessarily creating additional line items. Please advise.
Thanks & Regards
Satyajeet Ghosh

Hi Satyajeet,
Please refer to the below responses-
(A) Main Transaction 0250- I think you have to maintain the relevant entries in EK01 and EK02.
Please refer to the below link which also discusses the same issue
Account determination error during invoicing for internal main transaction 0250
(B) Rec.Transfer posting during invoicing- I think you are calculating the late payment charges for the Overdue items during invoicing with the following configuration in place-
IMG-->SAP Utilities-->Invoicing-->Invoice Processing--->Define Control for Additional Invoicing Functions
If that's the scenario, then check event R418.
Hope it helps...
Thanks,
Amlan

Delivery creation during transfer postings and posting changes

Dear Experts,
Whenever i am posting a transfer posting with movement type 412 'Q' in a HUM managed storage location it is creating a outbound delivery. Basically this is a posting change and the system should not create a delivery. I want to prevent the creation of a delivery in this case.
What are the settings that creates a delivery whenever a transfer posting is performed without reference to a STO or a PO. Any posting happening with MB1B or MB11 that results in a delivery. PLease let me know the exact settings to look out for.
Thanks in advance for your feedback.
Raj

SPRO>LOGISTICS GENERAL>>HANDLING UNIT MANAGMENT> BASICS>MATERIAL MANAGEMENT>INVENTORY MANAGEMENT>SET QMCHECK AND DELIVERY TYPE FOR EACH MOVEMENT TYPE
THIS IS THE NODE WHICH IS RESPPOSIBLE FOR THE SETTINGS OF DELIVERY CREATION
ALONG WITH THE ABOVE NODE THE NODE FOR HU REQUIREMENT FOR STORAGE LOCATION AND DEFAULT VALUE FOR DELIVERY IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE OUTBOUND DELIVERY CREATED IN YOUR CASE
Edited by: Sap: IN on Aug 17, 2011 7:00 AM

Transfer posting from batch to batch using 309 or 311 issue

Hi Experts,
Need your help, I'm facing the following issue, I'm trying to transfer posting from batch to other batch using 309,
Using MIGO
the material, plant, storage location are the same but the batch number are different, I didn't get any message and when I save, there's nothing is changed, I checked the material document and found that the destination batch is same as source batch.
Using MB1B
the material, plant, storage location are the same but when I entered the source batch, the batch number is copied to the destination batch number and I got message M7104 "stock to be removed from storage same as stock to be placed into the storage" and I can't change the destination batch number.
Please advise how can I solve this issue or if there's any alternative way to transfer from batch to other by one step.
Regards,
Mohamed Mansour.

You can well use 309 movement type in MIGO or MB1B and also you can well change the receiving batch number during the transaction..
MB1B
MIGO
I think you can able to change the receiving batch.
What the status of receiving batch shows in MIGO or MB1B ?
Also check you field selection for movement type 311
Go to OMBW, double click on 311, then double click on Transfer Posting
It should be as optional entry.
Then try again MB1B.
Regards
Dev

KB11N entry to be posted for large number of WBS elements

Hi,
As a requirement for our client, we need to make a transfer entry from one WBS element to another WBS element using KB11N. There will be thousands of these transfers to be made at every month end.
We want to write a program which will calculate the value to be transferred while time posting and make this transfer posting. But if we are using a BDC to call KB11N in that program its taking more time and its a performance issue for overall month end process..
If there can be anyother way to post that transfer posting by using any function module or program ?
Any help will be highly appreciated.
Thanks
Amit Goyal

Hi Amit
If the values to be transferred are available with you in excel, you can use LSMW to do the transfer entry for you
On an average, 5 records would be processed per second using LSMW in KB11N
br, Ajay M

Transfer posting (OASV) issue for the existing Intangible Assets

Hi SAP Experts,
In our system the APC and Acc. Dep. for ord. dep. has maintained the same G/L Account (A090) so due to this in Fin. Statement it shows the Net Book Value. Now, our client wants to migrate to IFRS, as per this it has to show like ( Intangible Assets - Acc. amortization - Acc. Impairment Loss). Now, I have created new account i.e. 'Accumulated Amortization for Intangible Assets A/c and removed the old G/L A/c (the one which is same for both APC and Acc. Dep.). Now, the old G/L has the APC and Acc. Dep. values so I need to transfer the Acc. Dep. from old G/L to New G/L A/c by using OASV (Transfer posting).
If I make the transfer posting like (the both G/L Accounts are Recon. A/cs)*
      Debit Old G/L A/c    - xx,xx,xxx
      Credit New G/L A/c - xx,xx,xxx
Is it any impact on the values (Intangible Assets) Dep. Area wise? Since, APC and Acc. Dep. already posted to old A/c up to this point of time. Another doubt is, while posting the above entry shall I need to switch off (Reset) Recon. A/c for this Intangible Assets? OR without Reset Recon. A/c can I post this transfer posting? Is this correct procedure or other than this is there any other alternative?
we have 9 Dep. Areas out of which 3 Dep. Areas have posting indicator as '1'. In that out of 3 Dep. Areas one Dep. Area namely 'Impairment Loss' is there but there are no positings till now. After config. change it should allow ABIF tr. that we completed already.
Could anyone explain why this 'Investment Support' Dep. Area (Impairment Loss) doesn't allow APC values by default?
Thanks in advance.
Best Regards,
Sri.

Hi Sri,
Let me clarify your points individually.
1) From system the prospective, it does not make any diff in functionality for a tangable asset or an intangable asset.
2) Add the new GL account in the respective account dtermination as a balance sheet account for accum dep. (while adding, the GL account should be as recon account)
3) Please switch off the recon account indicator in the both GL accounts with OAMK.
For Ex: Lets say you have already posted APC value 10000 Dr and Accum dep 2000 Cr to the old GL account, so the net book value will be 8000 Dr.
In this case Please find out the total value of line items (2000 Cr as per the above example) for accum dep, that was already posted to the old GL account.
4) Post a journal voucher through F-02 like
                                                  Old G/L A/c Dr - 2000
                                                                New G/L A/c Cr - 2000
So after passing this entry you will find account balance as 8000 Dr in old GL account and 2000 Cr in new GL account.
5) after passing the above entry you need to switch on the recon account for both the GL accounts
Hope this will help.
Thanks,
Srinu

Update termination during Periodic Posting in RE-FX

Hi,
I am getting a update termination error -SAPSQL_ARRAY_INSERT_DUPREC during periodic posting for Lease Out Contract. Tcode - RERAPP
We use deferred tax. This functionality is used to transfer service tax
credit from interimn account to final account as applicable in India.
As suggested in the note 913805 by SAP we deleted the BTE's in application Key FI-TAX
Inspite of that we get the same update error.
Also we observed that after deleting the BTE's our service tax credit
functionality is also not working.
Further I have observed the following:
I am getting error only while posting contracts with service tax.
Tax Code L1 Account Key OS1 & OS2 & OS3
Please help me in finding a soultion to this.
Thanks & Regards
Sanjay

Hi,
The transfer step will transfer controlling assignments from the contract to the rental objects. This is useful if you want to run the controlling reports in order to see a P&L statement for a Building for example.
Regards,

FI Entries during transfer posting

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for