FI-LC legal Consolidation

we have two codes in SAP ECC 6 both are separate legal entities.Co Code A owns 80% of shares of Co Code B
what should be the structure from consolidation point of View i.e parent subsidary relationship how would this be presented in SAP for consolidation purpose .
Do we have to assign both co codes to single company.or two codes would have separate Company assignment
Requirement is separate financial statements for both co codes & consoldated Financial statement (elimination of Inter Co code profits & Calculation of minority intrest

Hi Pablo,
I´m having the same problem.
I do not understand quite well what do you mean by "entering a valid scope in the opening period"
¿do you mean entering data in any account in a opening flow o do you mean entering a value in a rateform?
or non of then?
Thank you very much

Similar Messages

  • Currency and Groups Dimensions in Legal Consolidation, BPC 7.5

    Dear BPC Experts:
              I am using BPC 7.5 NW SP03, and building Legal Consolidation now. According to the SAP Library,http://help.sap.com/saphelp_bpc75_nw/helpdata/en/bpc_nw_index.htm, it says in 7.5, the currency and groups dimension are required and should hold currency members and consolidation members seperately. I have couple of questions about this design.
    1. Are GROUPS and CURRENCY dimensions both included in Legal Consolidation Application at the same time?
    2. How to move data in currency diemnsion into corresponding members in GROUPS dimension?
        For example: THe GROUPS member, CG1(its currency is USD). How to let data in currency USD move to CG1.
    3. In Legal Consolidation data package, should I modify the prompt dimension from CURRENCY_DIM into GROUP_Dim?? cause 7.5 has CURRENCY dim in its package setting at default. However, the consolidation package is based on GROUP perspectives.
        Does anyone give me any idea in it? I really appreciate your help.
    Best Regards,
    Fred Cheng

    Hi Collet,
    Thanks for such a quick response. Based on your answer,
    The group-type dimension is used for storing the group component of legal consolidation. The group-type dimension represents the relationship of entities for a given consolidation result. This group is consolidated in a single currency, so there is no need to have another dimension. As of Planning and Consolidation 7.5, you can continue to use the currency-type dimension for this purpose, or you can split it into a group-type dimension (type G) and use a pure currency-type dimension (type R) to allow reporting in multiple group currencies.
    If at all I go by that will that be sufficient to have only Group Dimension and ignore RptCurrency field in BPC 7.5?
    As of now I am having my Group Dimension looks like this.
    Member ID          EVDESCRIPTION        GROUP_CURRENCY        PARENT_GROUP      ENTITY
    G_CG1                XXXX                          USD                                                                 E_CG1
    G_CG2                XXX                            USD                                   G_CG1                   E_CG2
    G_CG3                XXXX                          USD                                   G_CG2                   E_CG3
    So now do I need to enter any RptCurrency Members under Group Member ID column to have RptCurrency ignored once for all. By the way our RptCurrency and Group Currency is USD only.
    Please advise as right now we are not able to have Currency Conversion Functioning properly. I mean when I executed FXTRANSLGF, I am able to my DM status as Successful but saying 0 Submitted   0 Success   0 Fail
    I am unable to crack this. I tired playing Groups and RptCurrency but same result. Successful but no records. We have maintained all Exchange Rates corrctly.

  • BPC 5 - Best practices - Sample data file for Legal Consolidation

    Hi,
    we are following the steps indicated in the SAP BPC Business Practice: http://help.sap.com/bp_bpcv151/html/bpc.htm
    A Legal Consolidation prerequisit is to have the sample data file that we do not have: "Consolidation Finance Data.xls"
    Does anybody have this file or know where to find it?
    Thanks for your time!
    Regards,
    Santiago

    Hi,
    From [https://websmp230.sap-ag.de/sap/bc/bsp/spn/download_basket/download.htm?objid=012002523100012218702007E&action=DL_DIRECT] this address you can obtain .zip file for Best Practice including all scenarios and csv files under misc directory used in these scenarios.
    Consolidation Finance Data.txt is in there also..
    Regards,
    ergin ozturk

  • Problem with Legal Consolidation for Journal

    Hi BPC Friends
    I have the application icmatching with data and I have written other values with Journal.
    I have run the package legal consolidation.
    I have this problem:
    for the value that I have loaded into the application, the logic consolidation works correctly, indeed it writes a new record with different datasource
    but for the value that I have written into the application using the Journal the logic doesn't work correctly, indeed it writes into the database a new record like the original but with contrary value so I lose also the value that I wrote with the journal
    Could you please help me?
    thanks
    regards
    Michele Medaglia

    Hello Michele,
    Basically what ever data that you input in journal as long as the selection on xdim is fulfilled the script will run normally.
    If its write in reverse and deleted your original data, it must be something wrong in your script, you can check at first.
    If the problem still you can't found, can you share us a little about the script?
    hope helps

  • Intercompany Elimination is doubling after running Legal consolidation

    Hi BPC Guru's
    Intercompany Elimination is doubling after running Legal consolidation Data Manager Package 2nd time tripples when run 3rd time and so on..Only change is that for resolving an issue with balance carry forward, we had changed the datasource type property for the audit trail members that store the eliminated amounts ealier this was A (Automatic) we changed that to (Manual) M and this is causing the doubling to start because if i change it back to A then there is no doubling..but the eliminated values are incorrect.
    Would be great somebody provides with their expertise.

    Hi Arnold,
    This issue is related to another issue that was discussed on the http://scn.sap.com/thread/3247090
    Till December all was well. Come January, after I run the consolidation package, the rule takes into account the balance from December for each month’s calculation:
    There were 2 suggestions from the above post that i tried:
    Check if “COPYOPENING” property in the Audit Trail dimension should not be “Y” -> It was Y for me but changing it to “N” did not solve my issue.
    Opening Flow should be assigned “FLOW_TYPE” property with the value of “OPENING”
    Both these are done in my system. But still the above issue exists. I also tried to change the rule to “Periodic” type but did not help.
      What I basically want is for BPC to ignore the values from previous year and run the calculation based on only the current month’s data.
    When we first faced this issue during January closing, as a temporary fix, we changed the “DATASOURCE_TYPE” property of the audit members used in Eliminations from A to M. This made the rule not consider December balances in the calculation.
    But doing this gave rise to the doubling issue.
    Any suggestions?
    Regards,
    Shruti

  • Error on legal consolidation

    Hi,
    we are using BPC 7.5 and we are trying to run a legal consolidation (SPRUNCONSO). The error we get is
    CSD-120: No Entity - Method available
    I have searched the forum for this error and found references to the ownership application. We do have one, it has data for the companies and period (plus previous year end) in question. I have checked the consolidation method used against those set-up (standard from Appshell, i.e. 90 and 86) and the rules we have created and it all matches and looks valid.
    Our accounts in ownership are
    PCON
    POWN
    PGROUP
    METHOD
    PMIN
    Most of the dimensions used in the ownership cube (category, currency, entity, intco and time) are shared with the consol app, only the account dimension is specific to the ownership cube.
    Does anyone have any idea what else I can check?
    Thanks,
    Arnold

    Dear Arnold
    I think your problem is to assign the consolidation method to the entity
    Into the administrator, define the consolidation method inside the business rule library
    for example
    90 for Holding
    86 for Global
    70 for proporcional
    etc.
    You have to create a input schedule, with the follow row and col
    ROW
    ENTITY
    COL
    CONSGROUP
    O_ACCT
    Afther that you can execute the package /CPMB/OWNERSHIPCALC to calculate the indirect plus direct consolithation percentage
    I hope this work for you
    Ariel

  • Legal Consolidation: Entity structure question

    Hi Experts,
    Just want to ask if technical Entities are required in order for Legal Consolidation to work in SAP BPC 7.5 NW SP6? I'm using both R-Type (Currencies) and G-Type dimension (Conso Groups). In my first structure, I only have the following set up in my Entity and Groups dimension:
    Entity Dimension:
    ID          EVDESCRIPTION          PARENTH1     CURRENCY     INTCO     FX_TYPE     ELIM
    ALL_COMP     All Company                         
    COMPT1          Company Group 1          ALL_COMP                    
    COMP1          Company 1          COMPT1             USD          I_COMP1          Y
    COMP2          Company 2          COMPT1             USD          I_COMP2          Y
    COMPT2          Company Group 2          ALL_COMP                    
    COMP3          Company 3          COMPT2             USD          I_COMP3          Y
    COMP4          Company 4          COMPT2             USD          I_COMP4          Y
    Groups Dimension:
    ID          EVDESCRIPTION     CURRENCY_TYPE     ENTITY     GROUP_CURRENCY     PARENT_GROUP     STORE_ENTITY     STORE_GROUP_CURR     CONSO_TYPE     DATASRC_LEVEL     STAGE_ONLY     
    GCOMPT1     Company Group 1             G               USD                                   Y               A               
    GCOMPT2     Company Group 2             G               USD                                   Y               A               
    NON_GROUP     Non Group     
    In this set up, my Consolidation results in error "RUN_LOGIC:Accounts and entities do not match data in application OWNERSHIP". But if I change my set up to the following(with technical Entities), I don't get the error:
    Entity Dimension:
    ID          EVDESCRIPTION          PARENTH1     CURRENCY     INTCO     FX_TYPE          ELIM
    ALL_COMP     All Company                         
    COMPT1          Company Group 1          ALL_COMP                    
    COMP1          Company 1          COMPT1          USD               I_COMP1          
    COMP2          Company 2          COMPT1          USD               I_COMP2          
    COMPT2          Company Group 2          ALL_COMP                    
    COMP3          Company 3          COMPT2          USD               I_COMP3          
    COMP4          Company 4          COMPT2          USD               I_COMP4          
    ECOMPT1             Company Group 1                    USD                         Y
    ECOMPT2             Company Group 2                    USD                         Y
    Groups Dimension:
    ID          EVDESCRIPTION     CURRENCY_TYPE     ENTITY          GROUP_CURRENCY     PARENT_GROUP     STORE_ENTITY     STORE_GROUP_CURR     CONSO_TYPE     DATASRC_LEVEL     STAGE_ONLY     
    GCOMPT1     Company Group 1             G          ECOMPT1     USD                         Y          Y               A               
    GCOMPT2     Company Group 2             G          ECOMPT2     USD                         Y          Y               A               
    NON_GROUP     Non Group
    Am I just missing some properties or set up in my first that's why I'm getting the error or do I really need to create technical Entities for consolidation to work??
    Thanks,
    Marvin

    Hi nilanjan,
    I was pertaining to the Entities with ID that starts with "E". Anyway, I tried removing the values "Y" for property "ELIM" in the Entity dimension and removed the values for "ENTITY" and STORE_ENTITY in the Groups dimension and I don't encounter the error and consolidation calculates okay.
    Thanks,
    Marvin

  • Difference Between Legal Consolidation and Management Consolidation

    Dear Experts,
    Kindly help me to know
    1) To Differenciate between Legal Consolidation and Management Consolidation Theoritically?
    2) To Differenciate between Legal Consolidation and Management Consolidation Technically in BPC?
    3) What is impact on /Difference on Business Process Flow in BPC in case of Legal Consolidation or Management Consolidation? (What should be done in Management COnsolidation and Legal COnsolidation in BPF in BPC)
    Thanks in Advance
    Ritesh

    True accounting/legal consolidations encompasses the three following elements:
    1.  the general ledgers of the entities
    2. elimination entries between entities (inter entity transactions such as sales/cost of sales, a/r and a/p etc.)
    3. adjustments for partially owned entities
    Using the legal app, rate and ownership apps, and the proper configuration, outlooksoft achieves a legal/accounting  consolidation.  Accounting consolidations also link to a legal hierarchy of entities.
    Any consolidation that is referred to as management or financial consolidation etc. can have differing connotations.   In Outooksoft  software,  management consolidations does not include item 3.
    However, when the terms are used by the client they can have different meanings.  They could mean either :
    A true legal consolidation BUT tied to the  Management hierarchy of entities (as  opposed to a legal hierarchy) OR An aggregation without item 3 above and tied to the Management hierarchy of entities.
    9 times out of 10, clients usually want the first  rather than the second alternative.  Financial statements
    rolled up using legal consol should equal that using management consol.
    However, when clients do planning, they may have their entities plan as if they were fully owned. They could also have their entities provide actals for less than 100% in the case of partially owned entities.   In these cases, you have to adjust appropriately.
    From an Outlooksoft config point of view, you need the legal, rate and ownership app and the related configuration for a legal consolidation.  Management consol depends on client definition and client practice in the data that they collect from the entities.
    In the area of BPFs, the key difference between legal and management COULD be the steps (1-3) and the maintenance of the different hierarchies and ownership values.
    Hope the above helps.

  • Template Blueprint for management and legal consolidation for BPC 7.0 NW

    Hi Gurus,
    Does anyone have a template buleprint document for starting with management and legal consolidation in BPC 7.0NW
    If you have request you to share me the documents
    appreciate your help and many thanks in advance
    Deepak

    Hi,
    please find big volume of information from these threads
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/40b25a12-7082-2b10-5c86-c227b9397fb3?overridelayout=truehttps://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/b09d5f42-36a4-2b10-cb82-fa58febeb7c2?overridelayout=true
    Re: Consolidation for SAP BPC
    also you can get latest information from
    http;//service.sap.com/pam
    regards
    nag

  • Legal Consolidation VS Management Consolidation

    Hi Gurus,
    In the reporting application types
    " Financial type allows to perform Management consolidation function and in Consolidation type allows to perform Legal consolidation function. "
    What is the difference between Management consolidation and legal consolidation ?
    I am bit confused can some one explain me what exactly it mean with an example??

    Hi,
    For the consolidation purpose,the data record contains at least the following fields:
    company
    company-partner
    Profit Centre
    Profit Centre-partner.
    For legal consolidation, only company-related data matters. Because Profit centre data will be taken from the other source.For management consolidation, only Profit centre-related data matters.
    There will be 2 initial data sets,  should be created as Consolidation Areas to meet the business requirements , for example ASML -Legal Consolidation,ASMM-Management Consolidation.This is as according to the best in practice approach to have different sets of data for legal and management reporting.  Management is focused on per segment, per product reporting and statutory focused on the legal entity view. 
    Each consolidation area will only hold the relevant consolidation unit.  That is, the statutory consolidation area will only hold company codes and will not post/process to profit centres at all.  The management view will hold Company codes/profit centres (sub assignment object) and the users will post only to the relevant company codes/profit centres
    Also Pls check these links...
    http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/FILC/FILC.pdf
    http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/ECCS/ECCS.pdf
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_sem40bw/helpdata/en/67/f7e73ac6e7ec28e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
    Re: Synchronize Master Data between BCS and BW within the same SEM system
    /message/1508507#1508507 [original link is broken]
    http://sap.ittoolbox.com/groups/technical-functional/sap-sem/dataflow-from-r3-to-sem-bcs-950671
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/webcontent/uuid/6e01a04e-0a01-0010-dfbe-951c2c39d169
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/c4/9057475ca611d4b2e30050dadfb23f/frameset.htm
    http://www.sapprofessionals.org/?q=sem_bcs_key_design_considerations_for_integration_points
    http://sapnewbie.blogspot.com/2006/03/sap-sem-bcs.html
    http://www.pragmatek.com/news/BW%20Reprint%20Jun%202004.pdf
    https://forums.sdn.sap.com/click.jspa?searchID=329906&messageID=549616.
    Follow this link.
    https://websmp103.sap-ag.de/sem
    Pls chk under for more detils: Forums -> SAP Solutions-> SEM-BCS.
    media library -> presentations -> SEM-BCS. Here u can find the relative document.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    CSM Reddy

  • After upgrade BPC from 7.0 to 7.5 NW we facing issue in Legal consolidation

    Hi
    After upgrade BPC from 7.0 to 7.5 NW we facing issue in Legal consolidation where in case of equity knock off the amount is not get balanced even after we run legal consolidation package in group currency.
    Regards
    Vikash

    Hi sandeep ,
    Hence the problem was not there with previous versions where the .js files were simply not compressed by default.
    Solution :
    I believe switching off javascript compression is a suitable option in this case as the script files are usually cached by the browser as well and will not be transmitted every time.
    Kindly follow these steps:
    1. Enter the J2EE Config tool.
    2. drill down: Global Server Configuration->services->http
    3. on the right hand side, click on NeverCompressed
    4. on the bottom, add at the end: ,*.js
    5. Apply the changes
    6. restart the J2EE.
    After this clear the browser cache and then log onto the portal and check if the issue gets resolve
    I hope it will useful to you.
    Thanks@ Re grads
    G.srinu

  • Built-in templates for Legal Consolidation in SAP BPC

    Hi guys
    I am doing a demo for legal consolidation and was wondering if there are built-in input scehdules (templates) in SAP BPC to assign the consolidation methods to entities (to let the system know how an entity needs to be rolled up in a group)?
    Also are there any input schedules (templates) to enter the Ownership % and Control % for various subsidiaries under a parent?
    Please let me know.
    Thanks,
    Ameya Kulkarni

    I don't think any of the default applications come with pre-built input templates.  The legal applications does come with a number of pre-configured business rules, but as far as pre-built input templates go none are available.  That being said, it is pretty easy to build a simple input template using the dynamic templates that come with BPC.  Starting with one of these you should be able to configure one of them for your demo without much trouble.  Let me know if you need help with that.
    Nick

  • Error in running Legal COnsolidation Package

    Hi All,
    On running the legal consolidation package i am constantly getting the same error which is :
    'RUNLOGIC:Dimension Set: "ENTITYDATAVALUE" not assigned in Data manager'
    I have checked all the dimensions and it all seems to be proper. I tried altering the input of data manager to include ENTITY dimension but the manager did not run at all.
    Please help me out. if anyone encountered the same error and has countered it pls share how to do so..
    Regards
    Navin

    Hi,
    I think you are using %ENTITY_SET% in your script. However, you are not prompting for the entity member in the DM package. You need to add the entity dimension in the prompt statement of the advanced script of the DM packge.
    Hope this helps.

  • When do we use legal consolidation?

    Hello Experts,
    Can you explain what is meant by legal consolidation & when do we use legal consolidation?

    Hi,
    legal Consolidation is financial process for public companies are required under law to consolidate their accounts of their entire operations across globe to present a single view of their business.
    In simple terms, legal consol is a process where all the operations are consolidated under the parent entity by looking at its economic interest in its daughter companies. The parent company has an ecomonic interest in the profits of its subsidiary companies as a result of its investment in them. so you consolidate against pre-determined rules.
    Thanks,
    Sreeni

  • Legal Consolidation problem

    Hi Experts ,
    Couple of days before , we restored the appset in the our development server .
    After we did the procees all the dimensions and optimization all the application .
    When i runned the legal consoldation , its running but no effect in the database .
    This our legal consolidatio  packaga file  :
    PROMPT(RADIOBUTTON,%CHEKCLCK%,"Select whether to check work status settings when running logic.",1,{"Yes, check for work status settings before running logic","No, do not check work status settings"},{"1","0"})
    PROMPT(SELECTINPUT,,,"Please select category, entity and time for restatement",%CATEGORY_DIM%%TIME_DIM%%CURRENCY_DIM%)
    TASK(Execute formulas,USER,%USER%)
    TASK(Execute formulas,APPSET,%APPSET%)
    TASK(Execute formulas,APP,%APP%)
    TASK(Execute formulas,SELECTION,%SELECTIONFILE%)
    TASK(Execute formulas,LOGICFILE,%APPPATH%\..\AdminApp\%APP%\LegalConsolidation.lgx)
    TASK(Execute formulas,RUNMODE,1)
    TASK(Execute formulas,LOGICMODE,1)
    TASK(Execute formulas,CHECKLCK,%CHEKCLCK%)
    I have one question here , we have the LGF file in the script login , but in the in package file it call in LGX.
    R we need do anything ...
    Regards
    Daya

    We done the both things .
    I done the validated and save , then ran the legal consolidation , the package runned suceessfuly .
    The data is not chnaged..
    Is there any way to track the issue.....
    In my view status , it showed  as
    TOTAL STEPS  1
    1. Default Formulas:        completed  in 0 sec.
    [Selection]
    CHEKCLCK= Yes
    (Member Selection)
    Category: ACTUAL
    Time: 2011.DEC
    Groups: C_OLAM
    Regards
    Dayalan M

  • Waht is legal consolidation?

    Dear All,
    What is legal consolidation?
    What are the stept to do this?
    b.s.rao

    Rao,
    Around the globe are volumes of legal regulations, or the equivalent, which require the reporting of consolidated financial statements and determine their contents. In addition, similar reporting regulations exist for listings on certain stock exchanges. In some cases, these consolidation regulations require (only) one consolidation on a legal entity level, but more in-depth details for particular statements. This is callled legal consolidation.
    The statutory consolidation(Legal consolidation) requirements depend on the legal and taxation regulations in the country of the parent company. In complex structures of corporate groups, these requirements may differ from group level to group level. In many cases it is sufficient to include the legal entities as consolidation units. For groups that report according to US GAAP or IAS, business segment reporting is also required. Most local accounting principles also demand business segment reporting from companies listed on a stock exchange.
    Hope this helps you.
    Rgds
    Manish

Maybe you are looking for

  • How to create the custom table?

    Hi, how to create the custom table and how to integrate the table with defferent R/3? my requiremnt is i have to create the two tables and those i have to integrate with the existed R/3 and using those R/3 i have to update my custom tables .....can g

  • Macbook Pro 4,1 (early 2008) is the DVI port analog or digital?

    I have been tasked with a slide show presentation on a family member's HD TV using my MacBook Pro 4,1. The TV is a slightly older big screen TV without HDMI inputs. I would lke to use the component (YPbPr) inputs on the TV rather than VGA. VGA degrad

  • Know any Good Flash Training DVD's For Sale?

    Hi, I am looking to purchase some good flash training videos for building sites and animation. I was wondering if anyone could recommend any. Thanks

  • Implementing a Text Component

    Hi all, I have to implement a custom text component for a project im working on. I was hoping someone could give me some direction on how to implement the text storage. I wont need more than the regular 256 ascii characters and text sizes could reach

  • Petition (Evaluation) for bringing old FF interface etc. back. Without mentioning TFFx.

    Since there is no way, of creating a poll, please all that want the old GUI back, post "me too". The reason behind it is, that people should not be forced to create a social media account to do so and that this is the only way developers get a feelin