Field is read-only -- Error

Using ASP vbscript, I created a small query to test one of my
db connections, requesting three fields from a specified record
based on URL parameter (this is a different project than my
previous post) running IIS with an ODBC connection to a local db.
The ODBC driver is read-only, which is fine, the purpose of this
project is to display reports, not data entry. Anyway, when I test
the query in DW CS3, everything is good, I get the results as
expected. When I upload the page to the remote server and test the
page I get:
HTTP 500.100 - Internal Server Error - ASP error
Internet Information Services
Technical Information (for support personnel)
* Error Type:
Microsoft OLE DB Provider for ODBC Drivers (0x80040E21)
Field is read-only
/job_details.asp, line 21
I am not updating or inserting, so I do not understand this
error. I also can't find anything on this specific error anywhere.
Anyone got any ideas about where I should start looking?

> It is using a DSN. I have never used this particular
ODBC driver or this
> type
> of database before (Omnis), so I don't know if the
problem was driver
> specific.
> All I know is that it works fine if I bypass the
parameter append.
>
> Now if I could just get the connection to work with
cross-platform
> servers.
> In the above example, I put a copy of my datafile on the
same machine that
> the
> web server is running on ... and it's working. But when
I try to connect
> to
> the live db, which resides on a mac osx server I get :
>
> Error Type:
> Microsoft OLE DB Provider for ODBC Drivers (0x80004005)
> Unable to read disk (bad disk)
> /job_details.asp, line 16
>
> But I can use the same ODBC connection from MSAccess on
the Windows
> machine
> and get query results.
Normally, I would advise against DSN and recommend an OLEDB
connection, but
I've never used that type db, don't know if a string is
possible.
www.connectionstrings.com does not show a string for it, so I
can't help.
Sorry.

Similar Messages

  • Changing not possible; field is read-only

    Hello,
    I need update Expected Value in Opportunity.
    Expected Value is bound Opportunity.SalesForecast.ExpectedRevenueAmount.content.
    When I try to update in adsl, "Changing not possible; field is read-only" error appears in frontend to the user.
    Thanks!

    Hi Rodrigo Mathias,Not an answer to your post just to share my problem
    Seems Opportunity has a lot of problems. As in my case i am trying to code in BeforeSave method that when ever the opportunity gets create by code i have to poppulate my CUSTOM Invonved Party ( i have created custom party role ).
    And i have passed partykey.partyId.content and RoleCode but when i click on save it gives me the error about Role Category!
    now when debugged that all Parties ( i debugged and checked whole collection) had the Role category every party from that collection had the Role category associated!
    So i tried to add r
    ole category by code! but that is also public write access set as FALSE!
    So finally i again opened the book for clod , and a line is specificaly written that PartyID node will not be used after 1402 there will be separate node PartyNAme where u can pass partyid , name or email!
    but unfortunately that is also not available in the opportunity BO!
    So i am also kind of stuck!
    Btw one thing i would like to mention is when u try to maintain your custom role in opportunity manually it works and data gets saved!
    Regards,
    Dhruvin

  • Fields in read-only mode for BP transaction in upgrade from 4.72 to ECC6.0

    Hello,
    This is regarding the query for BP transaction in upgrade from 4.72 to ECC 6.0.
    While creating BP / Changing BP system is disabling the fields in compnay code & sales area option. There is a SAP not provided 907860; and specified that the proplem is because of the delta customizing.
    All the customization settings are as per the note. And the Synchronization Control is also activated. But still the fields are disabled only.
    I have checked the field settings also in Cross-Application-Components & Logistic-Genral.
    But these are not working for compnay code & sales area data.
    please let me know if anyone has faced this type of problem / found any solution on this.
    Best Regards,
    Shubhada

    SAP IMG  -> Cross Application Components -> Master Data Synchronization  Synchronization Control -> Synchronization Control -> Activate Synchronization options
    This setting allows you to activate synchronization of BP with R/3. Not maintaining the values may result in certain fields being read-only in BP.
    Suggested Values:
    Source Object: BP | Target Object: CUSTOMER | Active Indicator : X
    Source Object: BP | Target Object: VENDOR | Active Indicator : X
    Source Object: CUSTOMER | Target Object: BP | Active Indicator : X
    Source Object: VENDOR | Target Object: BP | Active Indicator : X
    Have you set all of the above settings??
    BHARATH

  • Making a field as read-only using Forms Personalization.

    Hi All,
    I have one requirement.I developed one form which is used to display Customer related Information.Some fields are created under one block and "reason-for-write off amount" field is created under another block.I have created Master-Detail relation for these 2 blocks.If there is any "reason-for-write off amount" is present for queried customers then it shows the "reason-for-write off amount" data.check boxes also created beside customer number field in Master block.If there is no "reason-for-write off amount" for any customer I need to write it and when I click on "submit" button in my form it goes to database.
    Now my requirement is :
    I need to make "reason-for-write off amount" field as read-only and I need to CHECK corresponding Customer "check_box" and make "SUBMIT" button as disable using personalization.
    I wrote code in Personalization as
    Trigger-Event:WHEN-NEW-FORM-INSTANCE
    Condition: :DUMCUST.REASON_FOR_WRITEOFF IS NOT NULL
    Processing mode:BOTH
    Actions:
    object type: ITEM
    Target Object: :DUMCUST.REASON_FOR_WRITEOFF
    Property Name: Enterable
    Value:false
    object type: ITEM
    Target Object:      :XXMCS_CUSTOMER_DETAILS.CUSTOMER_NUMBER_CBX
    Property Name: Value
    Value:1
    object type: ITEM
    Target Object:      :XXMCS_CUSTOMER_DETAILS.SUBMIT
    Property Name: Enabled
    Value:False
    But it is not working..the applied changes are not affected in my form.I tried the above actions with WHEN_NEW_BLOCK_INSTANCE trigger also.I didn't write any validation triggers for these items in my FMB also.
    Could anyone please help me..
    Thanks in Advance.

    in your iterator declare the inputfield with disabled = true .
    p_replacement_bee = cl_htmlb_inputfield=>factory(
                                id        = p_cell_id
                                disabled  = 'true'
                                value     = comments ).
    this will generate the html like below
    <input type="Text"
    class="urEdf2TxtEnbl urEdf2TxtRo urV" autocomplete="off" id="TAB1_1_4" ct="InputField" name="TAB1_1_4" st="r" tp="STRING"
    readonly value="some value" onblur="sapUrMapi_InputField_Blur('TAB1_1_4',event)"
    onkeydown="sapUrMapi_InputField_keydown('TAB1_1_4',event)"
    onkeyup="sapUrMapi_InputField_KeyUp('TAB1_1_4',event)" onfocus="sapUrMapi_InputField_focus('TAB1_1_4',event)">
    now you can use js getElementById as this now has a id attached (TAB1_1_4)

  • Acrobat read-only error message

    http://forums.adobe.com/message/4117896
    Hello I am following on from a previously reported issue.
    We have a client who are using Adobe Acrobat 9 and have .PDF's saved in a Share Folder. Is the creator of the document but is still faced with the read only prompt when trying to save the document after making an edit (e.g rotating). Upgrading to Adobe Acrobat 9 isn't an option.
    Folder permissions in both Share and NTFS is okay.
    User's profile has full control of the folder it is being saved in. I've also ensured the reading pane is Windows Explorer is off when they're opening it.
    Have run a repair on Adobe Acrobat 9 and tried with other documents with the same result.
    Saving locally does not have the same issue.
    Please advise a solution for using .PDF for Adobe Acrobat 9 in a Share Folder environment.
    Server is SBS2008 and user's PC is Windows 7 Professional.
    Eagerly await a fix.

    I am having the same issue. Acrobat X was working fine for me for months, then out of the blue, it starts having this problem TODAY! (There must be something about the month of November when people have this problem with Acrobat! )
    Each time I open a PDF file in Acrobat and make an edit, (such as highlighting text or adding a link to a web page), I cannot save the file by the same name. I get the "read only" error message:
    "The document could not be saved. The file may be read-only, or another user may have it open. Please save the document with a different name or in a different folder."
    I installed the latest updates for Acrobat after this problem occurred, but the "read only" error message persists. In a previous thread, one person suggested turning off Acrobat's Protected Mode by going to Edit/Preferences/General and unchecking the Enable Protected Mode At Startup. I do not see this option in Acrobat X.
    The only work-around I've found is to save the PDF file with a temporary name, then after making the edits in Acrobat, save the file as the original name that you wanted the file to be in the first place.
    I'd rather not have to mess with work-arounds. I just want to make this problem go away. Any help or suggestions would be appreciated!
    regards,
    ChristyGTWE

  • Read only error message when trying to save updates in Acrobat 10.6.3

    Hello
    Hopefully I'm missing something obvious here but when I try to edit a PDF in Acrobat 10.6.3 I receive a read only error message, I have been using 'Save As' and tweaking the name each time but this seems to be a clumsy way to go about a simple save.
    I am on a network and have read a previous thread that explained Adobe can sometimes be flakey on networks for saving PDFs.
    Any suggestion gratefully received.

    You may be stuck with copying the files locally and editing and then copying back to the network drive. I am not good with networks, but have noticed posts about network problems over the years -- often focused on specific networks. The solution is typically to deal with the PDFs locally and then copy to the network. In creating PDFs, it seems that some of the results had to do with the TMP folder usage, but I have no clue why.
    As far as AA 10.6.3, you must have a cloud version or something. The latest AA is 10.1.7.

  • Time Machine Read only error launches airport

    I have a partitioned external and use Time Machine on an OSX10.5, and SilverKeeper for the OSX10.4.11 Mac. Everything's been fine until yesterday. Backed up the 10.4 machine with the designated partition, drive 'hung', computer crashed. So, now, the partition for the Time Machine computer doesn't work, the MAC Silverkeeper appears fine and I get the "Time Machine Read only error" on the MacB Pro 10.5. I can "read/write" for the other partitioned, can verify and repair. No go to repair the "Time Machine" partition. And here's the best part: If I choose "NONE" in Time Machine Preferences to unchoose that particular drive, The computer launches the Airport Express Utility and offers my Airport express as a choice for a drive. What's up with that?

    I have a partitioned external and use Time Machine on an OSX10.5, and SilverKeeper for the OSX10.4.11 Mac. Everything's been fine until yesterday. Backed up the 10.4 machine with the designated partition, drive 'hung', computer crashed. So, now, the partition for the Time Machine computer doesn't work, the MAC Silverkeeper appears fine and I get the "Time Machine Read only error" on the MacB Pro 10.5. I can "read/write" for the other partitioned, can verify and repair. No go to repair the "Time Machine" partition. And here's the best part: If I choose "NONE" in Time Machine Preferences to unchoose that particular drive, The computer launches the Airport Express Utility and offers my Airport express as a choice for a drive. What's up with that?

  • Time Machine read only error & dissapears

    I have been running time machine on a MacBookPro MacOS x 10.5.8 for 2 years.
    Last week for the first time I got the "External Drive is Read Only" error. I followed the instructions in Troubleshooting on verify and repair but it didn't work (details below). I bought a new external drive configured for MAC OS Extended Journaled format and it worked for 5 days before giving me the same error and the same problems reported on verify. I don't want to use the install disk again because it didn't work last time (and it is 10.4.9 not Leopard - I upgraded by download).
    I am at my wits end here. Given that the problem occurred on two different external drives I suspect a problem with my OS.
    Details of errors (more or less the same both times):
    Time Machine Error - Time Machine "Backup volume is read only"
    Finder initially showed that the back up folder was read/write for my user ID and the drive was read/write for the system (not sure because the drive now doesn't appear in finder or in Time Machine ("storage location cannot be found" message)
    Disk Utilities: Repair disk option was unavailable Verify disk was available
    Verify disk showed a lot error messages including a lot in red: e.g. "Incorrect number of directory hard links" "Incorrect number of threads" "Invalid Directory Item Count" "Invalid volume file count" - on the second drive (not the first) it could not complete the verify - error message Verify disk failed: Error: 'Filesystem verify or repair failed.'
    Repair disk was available on the Installation disk (10.4.9) - I ran it on the first external drive but it could not repair ANY of the errors. I haven't tried to run it on the second drive

    mysteryrare wrote:
    I upgraded to Leopard by going to the Apple site and purchasing the upgrade from there. It was a download.
    I never heard of that. I've always been told that OSX isn't available that way. (It must have been a massive download!)
    I will try Apple support but I am in Australia and it can take a while for things to get here.
    Yes, but if you ever have to reload, or even do a +*Repair Disk+* on your boot drive, you'll need it.
    The Disk utility is v 11.1 (252.4) dated 2007.
    Yes, that's the right one (I was afraid you had a Tiger version).
    I did not format the second drive myself. I purchased it as a Mac only external drive. I checked the format before and in Disk utility - it is definitely Mac OS Extended (Journaled) in both the disk and the partition. The Partition Map Scheme is "Apple Partition Map" which is supposed to be alright for an intel machine (which mine is). Should I change it to GUID?
    No, that's fine for TM. Only if you want to install OSX on it do you really need GUID. It's likely not a problem here, but most drives come with various software from the makers, often backup and/or management apps. On occasion, some will be running occasionally or constantly, interfering with TM or other things. That's why we usually recommend that a new drive be erased and reformatted.
    I did format the first drive myself before I used it. My memory of how I set it up is a little fuzzy but it worked for a long time. After the Time Machine failure, the Disk Utilities showed different format for the drive and the partition - which bothered me a little and was one of the reasons I bought a new drive. I was thinking about reformatting the drive but now I won't until I know what has gone wrong.
    That could have been part of the problem with the first one, but it's doubtful.
    So what do we do now?
    I don't recall hearing that DU wouldn't even offer +*Repair Disk+* on a drive it could recognize. But if DU won't repair the file system, and you don't have +Disk Warrior+ or other such apps, your only choice is to erase it and let TM start over. In this case, it's probably worth the time to see if DU can write to the entire disk.
    Select the top line of the drive, then click the Erase tab. Then click +Security Options+ at the bottom, then +Zero Out Disk+ and OK on the next screen, then confirm.
    That will, of course, take quite a while. If it fails, the disk is toast. But it should be covered by warranty, at least.
    If the zero-out succeeds, it doesn't necessarily mean the disk is good, but since it's new, it probably is. TM will, of course, do a new, full backup, which will also take a while.
    What sort of disk is this? LaCie had a run of bad power supplies lately (your symptoms don't seem to be the same, though), and WD has some firmware updates. You might want to check with the maker for driver and/or firmware updates.

  • Time Machine "read-only" error across multiple drives

    Hello,
    I've been having an ongoing problem for more than a year now. I continually get a "read-only" error message from Time Machine. To be specific, the message is: "Time Machine could not complete the backup. Files can’t be copied onto the backup disk because it appears to be read-only. You may need to repair or reformat the disk using Disk Utility. If the disk can’t be repaired, you must use a different disk for backups. Open Time Machine preferences to select a different backup disk."
    The problem is, this has happened with three separate backup drives. They are all G-Tech 2TB 4th Generation G-Drive external hard drives. So I'm wondering if there may be a Mac OS software problem, or perhaps a hardware problem.
    There's a lot to this story, so if you're game, read on.
    First, about a year ago, I noticed that my Mac Pro frequently spontaneously ejected the backup drive, for no apparent reason. I didn't deal with the problem right away because I was having other, pressing troubles with my display (which took forever to solve).
    In early-mid 2013, I tried a few disk repairs of my backup disk, as well as erasing the disk (and correctly formatting as Mac OS Extended Journaled). The disk was failing to mount at that point, so G-Tech sent me a replacement drive (a refurbished drive of exactly the same type).
    With the replacement drive, I was getting the same "read-only" message. So I tried a few times erasing/reformatting/repartitioning this drive. No luck.
    So I was sent yet another replacement drive. I experienced the same problems, and in addtion, I once got a message saying the backup drive was full when it actually wasn't. So I tried a) using a different firewire cable, b) using this different cable on a different port. Same problems.
    In the meantime, I did some backups with an old Glyph drive, using the same FW800 port, and the same cable (the 2nd cable), and I had no problems. The reason I don't use this Glyph drive as my normal backup drive is that it is only 500 GB and not large enough to back up all three of my MP internal drives.
    A couple other items of note: back in August of 2013, one of my MP's internal hard drives had to be replaced (it was determined to be having multiple input/output errors). Also, I've had a intermittent problem with the MP spontaneoulsy ejecting a couple different Lexar USB flash drives, even after I reformatted them repeatedly (but this has never happened with my ADATA flash drives). I suppose these things may be unrelated, but for the sake of completeness, I thought I'd include them.
    So it seems like maybe it's a compatibility issue the G-Tech Drives? I'd be surprised...but I'm stumped. Anyone have any ideas?
    Thanks.

    Hello,
    I've been having an ongoing problem for more than a year now. I continually get a "read-only" error message from Time Machine. To be specific, the message is: "Time Machine could not complete the backup. Files can’t be copied onto the backup disk because it appears to be read-only. You may need to repair or reformat the disk using Disk Utility. If the disk can’t be repaired, you must use a different disk for backups. Open Time Machine preferences to select a different backup disk."
    The problem is, this has happened with three separate backup drives. They are all G-Tech 2TB 4th Generation G-Drive external hard drives. So I'm wondering if there may be a Mac OS software problem, or perhaps a hardware problem.
    There's a lot to this story, so if you're game, read on.
    First, about a year ago, I noticed that my Mac Pro frequently spontaneously ejected the backup drive, for no apparent reason. I didn't deal with the problem right away because I was having other, pressing troubles with my display (which took forever to solve).
    In early-mid 2013, I tried a few disk repairs of my backup disk, as well as erasing the disk (and correctly formatting as Mac OS Extended Journaled). The disk was failing to mount at that point, so G-Tech sent me a replacement drive (a refurbished drive of exactly the same type).
    With the replacement drive, I was getting the same "read-only" message. So I tried a few times erasing/reformatting/repartitioning this drive. No luck.
    So I was sent yet another replacement drive. I experienced the same problems, and in addtion, I once got a message saying the backup drive was full when it actually wasn't. So I tried a) using a different firewire cable, b) using this different cable on a different port. Same problems.
    In the meantime, I did some backups with an old Glyph drive, using the same FW800 port, and the same cable (the 2nd cable), and I had no problems. The reason I don't use this Glyph drive as my normal backup drive is that it is only 500 GB and not large enough to back up all three of my MP internal drives.
    A couple other items of note: back in August of 2013, one of my MP's internal hard drives had to be replaced (it was determined to be having multiple input/output errors). Also, I've had a intermittent problem with the MP spontaneoulsy ejecting a couple different Lexar USB flash drives, even after I reformatted them repeatedly (but this has never happened with my ADATA flash drives). I suppose these things may be unrelated, but for the sake of completeness, I thought I'd include them.
    So it seems like maybe it's a compatibility issue the G-Tech Drives? I'd be surprised...but I'm stumped. Anyone have any ideas?
    Thanks.

  • Read only error after instalation

    I was using the Arch 0.7 beta2 build for a while and everything was, more or less, fine, I finally decited to update to 0.7 and now after I install I get a buch or "filesystem is read-only" errors and then it frezes when starting hotplug,  I love Arch, the philosophy is what I have been looking for, I hope someone can help,  Even Gentoo can't muster the speed!

    you can start with disable hotplug,
    you should also use udev instead if devfs, just edit your menu.lst(devfs=nomount) and your fstab to static naming scheme, (/dev/hdx),
    if that not help it could be some form of apm/acpi trouble, there are afew kernel parameters you could try as a workaround for that, can't remeber them in my head right now but i think a popular one is "noapic",

  • Set fields to read-only after addInstance()

    I have this function on my form "add row" which allows user to create a new row to fill in additional fields; when user click submit, the fields of the form will become read-only.
    however after i add another new row into the form, when i click submit that row does not change into read-only.
    this is the code for my add row: Table1.Row1.instanceManager.addInstance();
    and this is the code for my submit button, whereby upon clicking the field becomes read-only
    -----Test.#subform[0].Subform2[1].buttonForm.Submit::click - (JavaScript, client) -----------
    Test.Subform1.IsSubmitted.rawValue = "1"; //submitted ----0 is default
    Test.Subform2.Payee.access = "protected";
    Test.Subform2.Name.access = "protected";
    Test.Subform2.GST.access = "protected";
    Test.Subform2.Amount_GST.access = "protected";
    Test.Subform2.Currency.access = "protected";
    Test.Subform2.Invoice_Date.access = "protected";
    Test.Subform2.Invoice_No.access = "protected";
    Test.Subform2.Company_Code.access = "protected";
    Test.Subform2.Tax_Code.access = "protected";
    Test.Subform2.Payment_Method.access = "protected";
    Test.Subform2.House_Bank.access = "protected";
    Test.Subform2.Description.access = "protected";
    Confirm.presence="visible";
    Edit.presence="visible";
    Submit.presence="invisible";
    Add.presence="invisible";
    Table1.Row1.GL_Account.access = "protected";
    Table1.Row1.DC.access = "protected";
    Table1.Row1.GL_Description.access = "protected";
    Table1.Row1.Amount_exclgst.access = "protected";
    Table1.Row1.Tax_Code.access = "protected";
    Table1.Row1.Fund_Center.access = "protected";
    Table1.Row1.Cost_Center.access = "protected";
    Table1.Row1.Button1.access="protected";
    Test.Subform1.StaticText1.presence="invisible";
    Test.Subform1.Summary.presence="visible";

    Hello,
    Perhaps you could create a trigger for that table that prevents update, delete and even insert of rows before a specified timestamp.
    CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER <Triggername>
    BEFORE INSERT OR DELETE OR UPDATE ON <Table>
    FOR EACH ROW
    BEGIN
    IF <RowDate> < <sysdate - <days>> THEN
    Raise_application_error(-20001, 'ROW is in read only range.'
    END;
    null

  • How to change report region fields in read only mode?

    How to change report region fields in read only mode?
    skud.

    add the following javascript fuction to page header(or Javascript function and variables section)
    function disableItems(pRegionStaticId,pDisableFlag) {
      $('#'+pRegionStaticId).find('[name^=f]').each( function(){ /* matches fxx */
        if( $(this).attr('name').match(/f[0-9][0-9]/) ){
          return $(this);
      }).attr('disabled',pDisableFlag);
    pRegionStaticId is the region's static Id+
    Note that this code specifically disables only application arrays. Disabled items are not available after submission (and hence are different from readonly) . But any page javascript can modify disabled or readonly items(client side), so you must check at the server side to validate the data.
    You can disable items using
    disableItems('MY_REGION_ID' ,true);and enable them by passing false
    disableItems('MY_REGION_ID' ,false);

  • Cmp-field is read-only

    Say I have beans A and B where A <- B (unidirectional relationship)
    and A.cmp_A and B.cmr_A point to same db field
    I try this and get exception as below while doing A.setCmp_A()
    javax.ejb.EJBException: When a cmp-field and a cmr-field (relationship) are mapped
    to the same column, the setXXX method for the cmp-field may not be called. The
    cmp-field is read-only.
    the cmp-field and cmr-field are in separate beans.
    F1

    Say I have beans A and B where A <- B (unidirectional relationship)
    and A.cmp_A and B.cmr_A point to same db field
    I try this and get exception as below while doing A.setCmp_A()
    javax.ejb.EJBException: When a cmp-field and a cmr-field (relationship) are mapped
    to the same column, the setXXX method for the cmp-field may not be called. The
    cmp-field is read-only.
    the cmp-field and cmr-field are in separate beans.
    F1

  • How can I have a checkbox that a user checks and populates a field with read only text, then if another checkbox is checked it will allow user text input

    Hi
    How can I have a check box that a user checks and populates a field with read only text, then if another check box is checked it will allow user text input into that same field, her is my javascript
    var a ="Not Applicable"
    if (this.getField("Do").value == "Yes")
    a=""
    if (this.getField("DoNot").value =="Yes")
    a=a + ""
    event.value=a
    say if the "Do" cb is checked, Not Applicable would populate the text field, and if the "DoNot" cb is checked it would allow user input into the same text field, the javascript I have will not allow user input,
    thanks for any help I am new to javascript

    Are these fields mutually exclusive?

  • My boss cannot create a new subfolder by pressing "new folder" until he's already saved the file to his desktop. A "read only" error appears the first time. Is there a way to create and save to subfolder directly? It's Mavericks/Macbook Pro

    Hi, when my boss wants to save a new file in a new subfolder, he presses "new folder" but cannot create a new one because a “read only” error box appears. Once he saves the file to his Desktop he clicks on “save as” again and then he can create a new subfolder by pressing “new folder.” Is there a way to create and save to a subfolder directly without having to first save somewhere else?

    Your server file handling has nothing, and really nothing to do with Adobe software. If files don't get locked for (over-)writing and/or lose connection to the program opening them, then your server is misconfigured. It's as plain and simple and that. Anything from "known file types"/ file associations not being set correctly, MIME types being botched, crooked user privileges and file permissions, missing Mac server extensions, delayed file writing on the server, generic network timeout issues and what have you. Either way, you have written a longwinded post with no real value since you haven't bothered to provide any proper technical info, most notably about the alleged server. Either way, the only way you can "fix" it is by straightening out your server and network configuration, not some magic switch in Adobe's software.
    Mylenium

Maybe you are looking for