Field KZWI4 is not getting updated in table EKPO

I have a case where for two scheduling agreements the pricing procedure getting determined is the same, but the field KZWI4 (subtotal 4) in table EKPO is getting updated for one SA and not for the other. The only difference in the two SAs are the tax codes. Do tax codes have any bearing on the field KZWI4 getting updated in table EKPO?
Regards,
Pratima.

Hi Pratima,
unfortunately i can only write that I am facing the same challenge at the moment. I will update the discussion as soon as I have a solution.
Best regards
Bjoern

Similar Messages

  • CJ20N-fields are not getting updated in table PROJ

    Hi all,
    I have a requirement where I need to transfer the WBS element data created in one system to another using IDOC.
    The idoc has generated sucessfully and was also sent/processed successfully in the recieving system but fields STSPD and STSPR are not getting poulated in table PROJ.
    In the confic I have assigned FM:IDOC_INPUT_PROJECT to the process code.
    Thanks,
    Gaurav

    Hi,
    Please check with the Customer and Material Statistics group in the Customer and material master respectively.
    Further check with the LIS settings (Sales Area combination with the Update group).
    Reward points if this helps you.
    Regards,
    Harsh

  • Field TSABR is not getting updated in MHIS table.

    Hi All,
    The field TSABR (Scheduling Status: New Start Called) is not getting updated in MHIS table.
    Please do tell me how it will get updated.
    What is a logic behind it.
    Many Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Sanjay Tiwari

    Hi,
    I checked it my system and that field was getting updated ..
    For calls with status "New start called " will get updated in MHIS and for these call you will  only have the field scheduling status :planned date called " as marked . pls check
    regrds
    pushpa

  • Values not getting updated in table mvke

    Hi,
    I am working on a module pool program.In the o/p screen there are many records.If the user wants to change the field values of a particular record,he clicks on the checkbox besides that record and when he click on the change button,control goes to update screen.In this screen when the user changes the value of one particular field and click on the checkbox beside and then click on the execute button,the changed value of that field should get updated in that particular record in the database table.Here I want to update mvke and marc tables.
    I have used FM BAPI_MATERIAL_SAVEDATA to update the database tables.
    Only marc table is getting updated with changed values.mvke table is not getting updated.What would be the reason for this.
    I am sending a part of my code.Please check it.
    form move_mat_data .
    *Header
    gt_bapi_head-material = gs_output1-matnr.
    gt_bapi_head-ind_sector = gs_output1-mbrsh.
    gt_bapi_head-matl_type = gs_output1-mtart.
    gt_bapi_head-basic_view = 'X'.
    gt_bapi_head-purchase_view = 'X'.
    gt_bapi_head-account_view = 'X'.
    gt_bapi_head-sales_view = 'X'.
    *Client
    gt_bapi_client-matl_group = gs_output1-matkl.
    gt_bapi_client-base_uom = gs_output1-meins.
    gt_bapi_clientx-matl_group = 'X'.
    gt_bapi_clientx-base_uom = 'X'.
    *Plant
    gt_bapi_marc1-plant = gs_output1-werks.
    gt_bapi_marc1-pur_status = gs_output1-mmsta.
    gt_bapi_marc1-mrp_type = gs_output1-dismm.
    gt_bapi_marc1-mrp_ctrler = gs_output1-dispo.
    gt_bapi_marc1-serv_level = gs_output1-zserclass.
    gt_bapi_marc1-availcheck = gs_output1-mtvfp.
    gt_bapi_marcx-plant = gs_output1-werks .
    gt_bapi_marcx-pur_status = 'X'.
    gt_bapi_marcx-mrp_type = 'X'.
    gt_bapi_marcx-mrp_ctrler = 'X'.
    gt_bapi_marcx-serv_level = 'X'.
    gt_bapi_marcx-availcheck = 'X'.
    Material Description
    REFRESH gt_materialdesc.
    gt_materialdesc-langu = gs_output1-spras.
    gt_materialdesc-matl_desc = gs_output1-maktx.
    append gt_materialdesc.
    *Sales
    gt_bapi_mvke1-sales_org = gs_output1-vkorg.
    gt_bapi_mvke1-distr_chan = gs_output1-vtweg.
    gt_bapi_mvke1-sal_status = gs_output1-vmsta.
    gt_bapi_mvke1-valid_from = gs_output1-vmstd.
    gt_bapi_mvkex-sales_org = 'X'.
    gt_bapi_mvkex-distr_chan = 'X'.
    gt_bapi_mvkex-sal_status = 'X'.
    gt_bapi_mvkex-valid_from = 'X'.
    endform. " move_mat_data

    Hello Hema,
    Find the fields which you need to populate with values:
    As an example i'm trying to update DISPO from MARC and VKORG from MVKE.
    No need to fill clientdata and clienddatax.
    * Header data
          MOVE g_wa_mat_out-s_matnr TO g_r_headdata-material.
          MOVE 'X' TO g_r_headdata-mrp_view.
    * Plant data
          MOVE g_wa_mat_out-t_werks TO: g_r_plantdata-plant,
                                        g_r_plantdatax-plant.
              MOVE g_wa_mat_out-t_dispo_new TO g_r_plantdata-mrp_ctrler.
              MOVE 'X' TO g_r_plantdatax-mrp_ctrler.
              MOVE g_wa_mat_out-t_vkorg_new TO g_r_salesdata-sales_org.
              MOVE 'X' TO g_r_salesdatax-sales_org.
    Reward If Helpful.
    Regards
    Sasidhar Reddy Matli.
    Edited by: Sasidhar Reddy Matli on Feb 7, 2008 11:49 AM

  • Data is not getting updated in table using RFC

    Hi Experts,
    In my scenario, I am calling one RFC using RFC receiver channel. After running scenario, channel is showing status that RFC executed successfully. But when I am checking tables in R/3 system, data is not getting updated.
    Moreover , when we tried to execute the RFC manually in R/3 system, that time data uploaded into table successfully.
    Could anybody tell me what would the reason that data not uploading into table when we send it through XI.
    Regards,
    Sari

    HI Sari,
    as you have scenario with RFC receiver.. and as you mentioned that it not updating tables when run through PI but when you execute RFC manually tables got updates.. then following are the options you can check..
    -- if you check RFC communication channel and if everything ok on then.. this means that your RFC is getting triggered successfully..but as you said tables are not updated.. for this you can go to SXMB_MONI and check the log take payload after mapping.. and compare it with the input when you try to execute it manually.. I think the input when you try manually and input to RFC when you try through PI is different and that is causing the Problem.. you will be able to see the difference in input then check.. I think the problem is data and not RFC communication channel..so by using this you will come to know difference
    -- else if possible configure your ID in PI in RFC Receiver and then check and put breakpoint on ABAP side.. so that when PI will hit RFC you will get it in debug mode and able to see what is going wrong..
    Thanks,
    Bhupesh

  • Price for I/C (Cost) field in VF03 not getting updated for an Invoice

    hi,
    the amount field (KBETR) for condition type ZR04 in VR03, for a specific invoice generated, is coming out to be 0.00 USD.
    as a result, the condition value is also coming out to be 0.00 and hence, not getting updated.
    can anyone help me out with this?

    Hi Pratima,
    unfortunately i can only write that I am facing the same challenge at the moment. I will update the discussion as soon as I have a solution.
    Best regards
    Bjoern

  • Cred.lim.used  field in FD32 not getting updated

    hi All,
    I have a scenario where my Cred.lim.used field which is a %age value is not getting updated in fd32
    when I go to fd33 for a customer my Credit limit is 1,000,000.00
    and Credit exposure is 1,138.28- but the %age is 0.00 %.
    any suggestions
    thanks,

    Hi
    Think logically how it will show the   credit limit used in percentage just calculate
    credit limit used*100/ total credit limit
    1,138.28*100
    1,000,000.00
    will come to 0.11 % so system wont show it will consider only if it is more than 1%
    regards

  • Addtional tab CI field not getting updated in table

    Hi all,
    I am using cProjects 4.0 system.
    I had implemented addtional custom tab to display project custom include fields. In CI include of dpr_project table i added custom fields.
    Then created new webdynpro component and in implemented interface tab in had implemented DPR_CUST_EXT_INTF.  In view i displayed the 2 custom fields i added. In cProjects SPRO, i had given my component name for addtional tab. When I run the application it is showing those fields i added in addtional tab. While saving it is not updating custom field. Please let me know what needs to be done.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Karthick S

    Hi,
    For adding custom fields from CI_* includes, I advise you to use available feature in SAP standard 'field groups for customer fields' under : SPRO -> Collaboration Projects -> Global Enhancements to Project Elements.
    This is the easiest way to add custom tabs & fields without webdynpro development. All standard functions are supported: field control, save, BADI...
    BR
    Matthias

  • Formula field, Detail records not getting updated

    Hello seniors,
    i need help on 2 issues;
    first, Issue No. 1
    i have master-detail form with the following tables;
    POH                                  master record table
    PH_NO                              pk
    PH_PARTY
    PH_FXRATE                       exchange rate
    PH_PD_LOCAL_TOT           total of PD_LOCAL_AMT  from details records
    PH_PD_FOREIGN_TOT       total of PD_FOREIGN_AMT  from details records
    POD                      Detail records table
    PD_PHNO              fk
    PD_ITEM
    PD_QTY
    PD_PRICE
    PD_LOCAL_AMT        
    PD_FOREIGN_AMT
    M_PD_FOREIGN_AMT       Formula (PD_QTY * PD_PRICE)
    M_PD_LOCAL_AMT           Formula (M_PD_FOREIGN_AMT/PH_FXRATE)
    CTRL                 Control block
    M_PH_PD_LOCAL_TOT           Summary-Sum-Table=POD, Field=M_PD_LOCAL_AMT
    M_PH_PD_FOREIGN_TOT       Summary-Sum-Table=POD, Field=M_PD_FOREIGN_AMT
    Triggers
    POH Table
    Pre-Insert   and   Pre-Update
    :PH_PD_LOCAL_TOT := :M_PH_PD_LOCAL_TOT
    :PH_PD_FOREIGN_TOT  := :M_PH_PD_FOREIGN_TOT
    POD Table
    Pre-Insert   and   Pre-Update
    :PD_LOCAL_AMT := :M_PD_FOREIGN_AMT
    :PD_FOREIGN_AMT :=  :M_PD_LOCAL_AMTThe problem that i am facing is while i UPDATE a record.
    whats happening is when the form is in Query mode and if i change a record, lets say
    change the value of the field PH_FXRATE, then what happens is, on screen i get all Detail
    record's M_PD_LOCAL_AMT Calculated & Updated, but the actual db field PD_LOCAL_AMT remains unchanged
    in the database after i press F10 or Save button.
    The update takes place for the POH table and form displays 1 Record updated.
    whereas if i have for example 4 detail records, then form should update those as well and display finally
    5 records updated is'nt it..?
    In query mode,if i insert new or modify an existing record in the detail block, then at this point, form marks just
    that particular record as CHANGED. Thus making changes at db level only for this particular record.
    what i want is once i make changes to the field PH_FXRATE, then form should mark all detail records
    as CHANGED and on saving, the PRE-UPDATE tigger of POD table should come in to force and the changes
    in the values of M_PD_LOCAL_AMT in turn to the db field PD_LOCAL_AMT should get affected at db level.
    i have also tried to put these assignments
    :PD_LOCAL_AMT := :M_PD_FOREIGN_AMT
    :PD_FOREIGN_AMT := :M_PD_LOCAL_AMT
    at PRE-UPDATE of POH table, thinking that form might consider
    all detail records, at this point. i noticed that it does it, but only picks
    1 record (i guess just the first record always) and change a db level.
    No. 2 Issue:
    i have put a POST-FORM-COMMIT at form level for auditing the Total fields of POH table against the details records.
    Declare
         M_LC_AMOUNT NUMBER(13,3);
                  M_FC_AMOUNT NUMBER(13,3);
    Begin
         SELECT SUM(PD_LOCAL_AMT) INTO M_LC_AMOUNT
         FROM POD
         WHERE  PD_PHNO = :PD_PHNO;
         IF  :PH_PD_LOCAL_TOT != M_LC_AMOUNT  THEN
              :PH_PD_LOCAL_TOT := M_LC_AMOUNT;
         END IF;
         SELECT SUM(PD_LOCAL_AMT) INTO M_FC_AMOUNT
         FROM    POD
         WHERE  PD_PHNO = :PD_PHNO;
         IF  :PH_PD_FOREIGN_TOT != M_FC_AMOUNT  THEN
              :PH_PD_FOREIGN_TOT := M_FC_AMOUNT;
         END IF;
    End;i was testing and notice that in a query mode when all records are displayed.
    if i go on changing values on records and save or save later keeping the form open,
    form allows, but if 1 come back to a record which i may have changed and saved earlier, then it flashes Error;
    "Records has been changed by another user, requery to ..."
    i want to do an Audit before final db-Commit and keep the user free from this Error..
    Please tell me first of all, is my approach for both of my issues,correct.?
    if not, then please suggest what should be changed.
    i'll highly appreciate for all your help. TYVM. Regards.

    I did exactly as you suggested. It works well for new record insertion
    but when i press F7 to query it, its flashes messages before displaying detail records
    Field must be entered.
    Mr. Andreas,
    i have problem only when i change value of PH_FXRATE. It re-calculates on screen values for M_PD_LOCAL_AMT
    (Formula M_PD_FOREIGN_AMT/PH_FXRATE)
    i want the changed value of M_PD_LOCAL_AMT to be saved in the actual db-field PD_LOCAL_AMT.
    for this i have PRE-UPDATE on POD Table
    :PD_LOCAL_AMT := :M_PD_LOCAL_AMT
    :PD_FOREIGN_AMT := :M_PD_FOREIGN_AMT
    Which is doing that.It is not marking the detial record as CHANGED.
    I tried giving the above assignments in the PRE-UPDATE on POH table.
    It saves the changed value in the db-field, but not all detail records, if more than 1.
    what you have suggested, will get me acheived what i am looking for..?

  • KINAK field in Table KONV not getting updated with value W

    Hi,
    I have a PO where I am deleting a line item.
    After I delet line item the field KINAK in table KONV gets updated with value W.
    But I am getting instance where in some cases the field KINAK is not getting updated.
    The result is deleted line item is getting populated in PO output also.
    Regards
    Nandiini

    KINAK is updated only when a Condition is inactive ! So when a item is deleted the condition becomes inactive and gets updated with 'W' which means statistical(not to be counted)
    A     Condition exclusion item
    K     Inactive due to calculation basis/shipping material type
    L     Condition exclusion header or inactive at header level
    M     Inactive due to manual entry
    T     Inactive at header level
    W     The document item is statistical
    X     Inactive via formulae of incorrect
    X     Inactive via formulae of incorrect
    Y     Inactive because of subsequent price

  • BDOC status completely processed: data not getting updated

    Hi Experts
       I'm  downloading BP data from R/3 system to CRM system , data is successfully getting into the CRM system when checking the SMW01 it was showing the status fully processed (status green) ,but data is not getting updated in tables.
    Please let us know what could be the possible reason
    Thanks & regards
    Rajasekhar

    1) First check the data in the BDOC. Check if the partners are really cmoing.
    2) Check if there are any dumps created in ST22. If yes Pls analyze them.
    3) Check the flow defintion for bdoc type BUPA_MAIN. You can check this in SMW01. Check if the actual call to upload the data and  create BP is done.

  • TDS amount not getting updated in the table under the field QBSHB

    Dear Friends,
    The TDS amount entered while booking the vendor invoices through MIRO T-cde, is not getting updated in the table BSEG under the field QBSHB. 
    Kindly let me know the reason for the same and guide me to correct it
    TIA.
    Regards,
    Vincent

    HI Vincent,
    Bseg-QBSHB field is relavent for classic WT.
    I hope you are using the EWT.
    Hence if you post a document through MIRO it will not update
    (but if you post document FB60 it will update but wrongly).
    Reason is Miro document is posted through interface.
    Hence SAP is suggested to not refer the Bseg-QBSHB and etc., fields.
    refer only with_item table.
    Please refer the below replay from SAP
       Please refer the below note .363309
    Please review attached note 363309 for detailed explanation
    BSEG-QBSHB is designed to fill for the classic withholding tax. And
    extended withholding tax information is stored exclusive in table
    WITH_ITEM.
    You can check in table BSEG for the fields and will find that system
    do NOT update field BSEG-QBSHB.
    In your line layout,you define a field BSEG-QBSHB. But actully the field
    of vendor/customer line item is filled with zero from FI. Thus,it shows
    zero in line item display.
    And as note 363309 says,
    "Remove the field which contains the withholding tax information
    from your display variant.
    If you want to display the withholding tax information, double-click on
    the document number and subsequently choose 'Withholding tax' button."
    (BSEG-QSSKZ, BSEG-QSSHB, BSEG-QBSHB) field is not relavent for
    Extended withholding tax and not suppose to use in report FBL1N.
    It basically does not make any sense to use the withholding tax fields
    of the document line items (BSEG-QSSKZ, BSEG-QSSHB, BSEG-QBSHB) with the
    activated extended withholding tax.
    regards
    Madhu M
    Edited by: M Madhu on Jan 31, 2011 1:19 PM

  • Custom field in BP_PDBGP table not getting updated

    Hi,
    i am working in Contract management in SRM 7.0 Pack 6. I have aadded a custom field in partner table which appears in the partner table of contract header. It is a checkbox. when i check it the value gets saved in BBPPDBGP table for the first time after that if i try to uncheck it the value is not getting updated. I checked in the BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI, the value which is getting passed is correct but it doesn't update the databse accordingly.
    Any suggestions? is this a standard bug?
    Neha

    Hi Virendra,
    Thanks a lot for your suggestion.
    Where should i check? If the data passing to BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI is correct then that means at the webdynpro side there should not be any problem and as per the standard after doc_change also it should save properly. i also checked the badi there is not dependent coding done over there. DOC_SAVE badi is also inactive for contract business object. Hence, i am not getting any clue where could be the problem.
    Let me know if you want more details inorder to analyse this problem.
    Thanks &Regards,
    Neha

  • REGUP Table Withholding tax field not getting updated

    hi friends,
                  from a specifc date with holdiing tax is not getting updated in REGUP-QBSHH field, so in payment advice its not getting displayed. can any one help me wat could be the problem for this
    thanks
    nagaraj

    hi amir,
            i dont have test case for that. till 28th of the last month the field has been updated and after that till now all the entries in that field is showing zero. but when we check in FB03. i can see the with holding tax amount. can u tell me how this table is getting updated
    thanks

  • The currency is not getting updated in the table VBAP

    Hi ,
    The currency is not getting updated in the table VBAP. The currency was suppossed to be copied from the header table VBAK for a Sales Order. When the user creating a Sales Order the currency WAERK is not shown in VBAP table. VBAK-WAERk is in EUR . Does anyone know why is this happenning?
    Currency is maintained in the Customer Master, Material Master and Sales Org. Any suggestions?.
    Also it is happened for only one line item in a set of line items , Other line items did display the currency field.
    The net Value has data in it .
    The system is ECC 5.0
    Regards,
    Senthil

    Dear Senthil,
    Please apply the following notes (if they apply to your support pack level) and retest:
    1460621 VBAP-WAERK is deleted after the sold-to party is changed
    1426441 VBAP-WAERK deleted for subitems
    1493998 VBAP-WAERK deleted for subitems
    This should resolve the issue. I hope this helps.
    Best regards,
    Ian Kehoe

Maybe you are looking for