Field Level Mapping For OCDM Release 11.3.2

Hi Everybody,
We are implementing a EDW using OCDM For a telco operator.Our major issue is that we don't have a column description/mapping for the OCDM tables.I had a link to the following patch which had the columnar documentation for a previous release(11.2.3)https://support.oracle.com/rs?type=patch&id=9450986
Can anybody point to towards a corresponding solution for the current release?
Thanks In Advance,

Please read the documentation:
Downloading and Extracting Client Installers
Installing Individual EPM System Clients
Installing EPM System Clients from EPM Workspace
Launching Clients
Cheers
John

Similar Messages

MDG Road Map for future release

Can any one share the link for MDG Road map for future release. I am looking specifically at the enhancements for data domains.

thank you for the answer!
next year we plan to migrate our databases from 10g to 11g R2.
the reason for R2 is that the second realease is a more stable version.
best wishes,
georg promok

Best way to author field level help for a CHM?

Hi
I have been asked to create an HTML help (CHM) system for a .Net application which will include context sensitive help at both page and field level.
I have used map ids for page level help before - i.e. assigned a map id to topics and given this list to a developer for implementation, but I have never created field level help.
I've been looking at the 'What's This?' help project wizard but am confused as to whether this is the best approach and how it fits with the project as a whole (or even if it compatible with .Net applications). Does this mean that I need two help projects for the application - one for the main help, and one for the field level help? Is there a way to create field level help without using the 'What's This?' wizard?
I am using Robohelp 7.
Any advice gratefully received!
Chloe

Hi, Chloe,
As Peter notes, even Microsoft has backed away from using field-level Help in the last few years, so it may be worth trying to determine whether your users will benefit from having it available to them. That's not to say that you can't deliver field-level Help, however, as all the required methods for calling it are still available to .NET developers.
To clarify, what Madcap Software calls "DotNet Help" is just a proprietary Help viewer that the company hopes will be more modern and appealing to writers than the older HTML Help (.chm) viewer. HTML Help remains the recommended format for Windows applications, whether .NET or not, and you can use any authoring tool that is capable of outputting a .chm file to create online Help for a .NET application.
The method that your developers use to call field-level Help determines how it should be authored. If they use the standard .NET method (the SetHelpString method of the HelpProvider class), each text string is embedded in the application code itself, and not retrieved from your .chm file. More information here:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.windows.forms.helpprovider.sethelpstring(VS .71).aspx
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/821777
http://helpware.net/mshelp2/demo2/h1xNET.htm
Alternatively, developers can use the old HTML Help API to retrieve the text string from a .chm file. See:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms670082(VS.85).aspx
http://helpware.net/htmlhelp/how_to_whatsthis.htm
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=317406
The drawback of both methods is that the Help popups are plain text only — no graphics, text formatting, hyperlinks, etc. To work around this, some people use the third-party KeyHelp control to create feature-rich HTML popups. See:
http://www.keyworks.net/keyhelp.htm
This allows you to deliver the type of Help that you mentioned in your second message ("is there a way to do this so that these topics open in a small popup, without the TOC / tri-pane structure?").
Pete

Field level validations for an Infotype

Hi,
Can anybody tell me if field level validations can be done for each and every field in a HR infotype?
Thank you.

You can do most of the validations using the Infotype User exit ZXPADU02 or the AFTER_INPUT mrthod in the BAdI HRPAD00INFTY.
But each & every field -- NO
~Suresh

Withdraw Field level RETRO for IT-0021

Hi,
Please let me know, is there any impact on Payroll (Indian) in case Field level RETRO is withdrawn for IT-0021
G.V.Mohan Rao,sCCL

IT 0021 is Dependent on.....Subtypes

Which table field is used for getting Release quantity

Hi friends,
please tell me which table and field used to get "Release Quantity" also i want "Cumulative GR by release" table and field please do reply if u know.
Thanks
Yogesh

Hi,
RSEVENTCHAIN      Event
Chain Processing Event Table
RSEVENTHEAD        Header
for the event chain
RSEVENTHEADT        Header
for the event chain
RSPCCHAIN     Process
chain details
RSPCCHAINATTR
Attributes for a Process Chain
RSPCCHAINEVENTS      Multiple
Events with Process Chains
RSPCCHAINT      Texts
for Chain
RSPCCOMMANDLOG     System
Command Execution Logs (Process Chains)
RSPCLOGCHAIN
Cross-Table Log ID / Chain ID
RSPCLOGS
Application Logs for the Process Chains
RSPCPROCESSLOG     Logs for
the Chain Runs
RSPCRUNVARIABLES
Variables for Process Chains for Runtime
RSPC_MONITOR     Monitor
individual process chains
Regards
Ashwin

We need to give field-level authorization for some fields

The schenario is as follows :
1. There are various storage locations within a plant.
2. There is one or more people incharge of creating PO and receiving
stocks for every storage location.
3. We dont want to authorise the person incharge of one storage
location to receive stock in another storage location or even view the
other storage locations at the time of creating the PO or any other
transaction. The user incharge of one storage location should not be
able to view any other storage location in any storage location field's
drop down.
regards
Manish
+91 9811647727

Hi Umesh,
Please see the documentations for authorization profile P_ABAP in the R/3 library and the following:
SU03 -> HR Human resources -> position your cursor to P_ABAP HR: Reporting -> choose button "Docu." -> the pop-up "help - P_ABAP" appears.
There is an example, which describes a similar issue regarding RPTIME00 and the Basic pay infotype (0008).
The standard reports of personnel administration are based on logical database PNP I would recommend to set your authorization as follows:
Object HR: Master data (P_ORGIN) (two authorizations)
Infotype                  0002             ' '
Subtype                   *                ' '
Authorization level       R                ' '
Organizational key        ' '              0001YYYYXXX
Object HR: Reporting (P_ABAP)
Report name                SAPDBPNP
Degree of simplification   1
Please note, that if a user has authorization for e.g. the birthday list , (s)he will be able to view the birth date through thisquery, although (s)he cannot access to IT0002 through PA20.
Another possibility would be using Customer-Specific Authorization Object P_NNNNN. I have attached a file with a very comprehensive documentation regarding HR authorizations. P_NNNNN is documented on pages 40 ff.
Hope this help
Sarah

Field level Authorization for IT0002

Hi All,
We have a requirement to control the authorization for the field NI Number/Social Security number from IT0002.
This field is getting displayed in various standard reports which are in use by administrators/Managers etc....
We want to disable the access of this field to every one, even the HR administartor.
Kindly suggest if this is possible using authorizations.
I know that we can hide the field in display access for PA20 or PA30, but I am particularly serching the option for various reports.
Regards,
Umesh Chaudhari.

Hi Umesh,
Please see the documentations for authorization profile P_ABAP in the R/3 library and the following:
SU03 -> HR Human resources -> position your cursor to P_ABAP HR: Reporting -> choose button "Docu." -> the pop-up "help - P_ABAP" appears.
There is an example, which describes a similar issue regarding RPTIME00 and the Basic pay infotype (0008).
The standard reports of personnel administration are based on logical database PNP I would recommend to set your authorization as follows:
Object HR: Master data (P_ORGIN) (two authorizations)
Infotype                  0002             ' '
Subtype                   *                ' '
Authorization level       R                ' '
Organizational key        ' '              0001YYYYXXX
Object HR: Reporting (P_ABAP)
Report name                SAPDBPNP
Degree of simplification   1
Please note, that if a user has authorization for e.g. the birthday list , (s)he will be able to view the birth date through thisquery, although (s)he cannot access to IT0002 through PA20.
Another possibility would be using Customer-Specific Authorization Object P_NNNNN. I have attached a file with a very comprehensive documentation regarding HR authorizations. P_NNNNN is documented on pages 40 ff.
Hope this help
Sarah

E-Recruitment - Requisition - Infotype Field Level Change Log

Hi Experts,
We are implementing SAP E-Recruitment, and would like to know how to capture the changes made in Requisition at infotype field level.
For example: If a support team member is added/delete in the Requisition (Tab - Support Team), then these changes (NEW/DELETE) at the infotype field level are required.
I have tried to maintain the infotype and the required fields in V_T582A, V_T585A, V_T585B and V_T585C. But didnt get any result when I executed the report RPUAUD00. Is there any additional configuration required for this?
Please adivse.
Thanks and Regards,
Dinakaran R

Hi,
You can just to that with the infotype table log. Support team is stored in table HRP5131.
Regards,
Nicole

Field level Validation in SAP PI

Hi All,
I am integrating with a 3rd Party system (File to Proxy scenario). Source file contains around 30 fields. I was asked to do field level validations for each of this field in PI. Is this a good practice. Do we do field validation in PI Integration development? I think PI should contain more of integration logic than field level validations. Please suggest.
Also out of all the 30 fields few are numeric, some are text and some are dates. While creating data types do I need to created all as string or based on their nature I need to use integer,date etc? Please suggest which is the best practice.
Thanks.

I agree with Rahul.
Yes we can perform validation in PI (most of the cases we do by request of the Business team).
But always have a thumb rule for your self.
1. Check first weather the source system is capable of doing the validation at its end.
2. If YES make sure the source system does the validations required. (I am sure most of the app would be able to the validation).
3.If NO then accept the validation process to be done in PI end.
One Important thing:
What kind of validation are you taking about? i assume this is field level validation rite?
and this is a Proxy to file scenario rite.
I will strongly suggest you to do following things at source and receiver Business systems.
1.gather a meeting the with the end business teams (source and receiver).
2.Force them to create data type at their end (sorce and target)with same data type structure- with same field length even.
ie, if source first field is integer with maxlen25 corresponding reciver field is also integer with maxlen25, if source has char field then in reciver also its char.
If you make both the source and reciever business to have same data type at there end, NO VALIDATION would be required to be done in PI
also in this case you can declare all the data type as STRING in PI and pass the data to receiver system. (which has the same data type as sender).
Regards,
Senthilprakash.

Delimiter in Syndication Maps for Multi-Valued Fields

We are in the process of upgrading to MDM 7.1 from MDM 5.5. In one of our syndication maps we are syndicating a multi-valued hierarchy field with no particular limit as to how many values the field can hold. In the old MDM 5.5 Syndication map the xml output delimits this data with ";" (semi-colon) as in the below example.
<Field>Level 1Level 2Value 1; Level 1Level 2Value 2;Level 1Level2Value 3</Field>
In MDM 7.1 the values are separated by a "," (comma) like in the example below.
<Field>Level 1Level 2Value 1, Level 1Level 2Value 2, Level 1Level2Value 3</Field>
Is there anyway to change the delimiter in MDM 7.1 from a "," (comma) to a ";" (semi-colon) with out splitting the field?
Thanks!
Sincerely,
Courtney

Hi Brewer,
Is there anyway to change the delimiter in MDM 7.1 from a "," (comma) to a ";" (semi-colon) with out splitting the field?
Yes, for e.g in in your syndication map at source item lookup field display as follows
Country
|___ Code
|___ Name
just map country to destination item instead of using Code or Name, multi vaule will display with ; operator
In one of our syndication maps we are syndicating a multi-valued hierarchy field with no particular limit as to how many values the field can hold.
if you want to set length of field you require to set properties at destination item as follows :
Fixed Column Width : the specific with destination item
Max Item Length : Maximum length allowed for the item
Hope Above mention point will resolved your problem if not revert back
Thanks,
Jignesh Patel

What is the table field for PO releaser in R/3 (4.7 Enterprise)?

Hi Gurus out there:
Do you know if there is a table field for PO releaser in R/3 (4.7 Enterprise)?
We use for e.g. the transaction ME29N to release a PO and I haven't been able to find a DB table where the PO releaser is stored.
In DB table EKKO I can find the fields FRGGR (Release group), FRGSX (Release strategy), FRGKE (Release Indicator), FRGZU (Release status) and FRGRL (Release Not Yet Completely Effected) but no information of the user who released the PO.
Many thanks in advance.
/hw

Hi
<b>Have you tried reading the details of the PO Releaser using the BAPIs ?</b>
BAPI_PO_GETRELINFO
BAPI_PO_GETITEMSREL
BAPI_PO_GETITEMSREL            List Purchase Orders for Release (Approval): New as of 4.0A
BAPI_PO_GETRELINFO             Display Detailed Release (Approval) Information on Purchase Order
BAPI_PO_RELEASE                Release Purchase Orders
BAPI_PO_RESET_RELEASE          Cancel Release of Purchase Orders
<u>Related link -></u>
Re: How to fetch data from back end for PO?
Hope this will help.
Do let me know.
Regards
- Atul

Message Mapping for multiple item levels

Hi,
My query is regarding message mapping
Example of source data structure & Target data structure
Source data Structure
<item>
      --<no>1</no>
      --<address/>
      --<ITEMS>
        ----<item>
          ------<Name>a</Name>
        ----<item>
          ------<Name>b</Name>
<item>
      --<no>2</no>
      --<address/>
      --<ITEMS>
        ----<item>
          ------<Name>c</Name>
        ----<item>
          ------<Name>d</Name>
Expected Target data structure
<Item>
-- <no>1</no>
-- <name>a</name>
<Item>
-- <no>1</no>
-- <name>b</name>
<Item>
-- <no>2</no>
-- <name>c</name>
<Item>
-- <no>2</no>
-- <name>d</name>
How I can map the '<no>' field to target '<no>' field to repeat value until to second sub item level occurance complete ?
Thank you
Sateesh

Hi Sateesh,
Please see the solution below.
The are 2 contect changes you need to do on field level. Right click and go to context and select your context you need.
Context on ITEMS - Should be on Root Structure(In my mapping it is MT_Multiple_Item_Level_Source)
Context on Name - Should be on Item (The first Item Tag)
Good Luck.
Regards,
Jannus Botha

Table field for PO releaser in R/3 (4.7 Enterprise)

Hi Gurus out there:
Do you know if there is a table field for PO releaser in R/3 (4.7 Enterprise)?
We use for e.g. the transaction ME29N to release a PO and I haven't been able to find a DB table where the PO releaser is stored.
In DB table EKKO I can find the fields FRGGR (Release group), FRGSX (Release strategy), FRGKE (Release Indicator), FRGZU (Release status) and FRGRL (Release Not Yet Completely Effected) but no information of the user who released the PO.
Many thanks in advance.
/hw

Meanwhile I have found a solution to this problem:
CONCATENATE sy-mandt <ekko-ebeln> INTO tabkey.
SELECT SINGLE * FROM cdpos
WHERE objectclas = 'EINKBELEG'
AND objectid = <ekko-ebeln>
AND tabname = 'EKKO'
AND tabkey = tabkey
AND fname = 'FRGKE'
AND chngind = 'U'
AND value_new = '1'. " PO has been released
IF sy-subrc = 0.
SELECT SINGLE username
FROM cdhdr
INTO po_releaser
WHERE objectclas = 'EINKBELEG'
AND objectid = oitab-ebeln
AND changenr = cdpos-changenr.
ENDIF.

Value Maps for Collections in Archiver missing some fields

Hi all,
I'm using Archiver and I need to map some of my folder metadata like the profile trigger but when I'm at the "Edit Value Maps" to map the old value to the new value for this field I find that the field I want is missing (in fact all fields that start with ColMeta. are missing.. something tells me these are the fields that are custom).
It does not let me do a custom query either! is there any way I can get this to work?
This field does appear for Content tho, it's just for folder/project metadata.
I'm looking into doing a "Field Map" from ColMeta.xProfileTrigger to some field available and then use that field for the value map but I'm not sure of the implications this will have in the field I choose since those others are fields used for something else and I don't want my mapping going to that other field.
Thanks for any help,
malky

Well nevermind I solved it, but I'll say how in case someone has the same problem:
Just create the archive with any field, then go and replace that field with the one you want everywhere in the archive.hda file.
If someone has a more elegant or better way to do this I'd like to hear it for future reference.
Cheers,

Field Level Mapping For OCDM Release 11.3.2

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for