Field property indicator is not ready for input in sap

HI All,
i am trying to post transaction in GJT1.
i am getting below error "field property indicator is not ready for input"
i tried taking different asset,
now it is showing below error msg. please assist me on both the issues.
"system status CRTD is active"

I got the answer.
using GJVV i was able to resolve my issue.

Similar Messages

  • BADI Error: Field GOITEM-ACCT is not ready for input ? HELP!

    I get this error message when testing my BADI in the MIGO Transaction.  The BADI is the MB_MIGO_BADI.  It is from the Line_modify method.  Here is the entrie message:
    BAdI: Field GOITEM-ZZREG_ACCT is not ready for input. (Change is not copied over)
    Message no. MIGO050
    Diagnosis
    The contents of field GOITEM-ZZREG_ACCT have been changed in BAdI MB_MIGO_BADI (method LINE_MODIFY). The field, however, is not ready for input, so the change cannot be copied.
    In method LINE_MODIFY, only the contents of fields that are ready for input can be changed.
    The field is defined correctly in the screen as an input/output field - so it does not relate to that.
    HELP!!!!!

    Yes - I have reviewed all of the code and I never do any modify to the screen attributes of a field - although it sure acts like it.  The screen lets me put in data and it stays there up until it finishes the method line_modify.  The error is when i press return after i enter the field- it completes the BADI method and then goes to the main program and does field validation and always comes back with some internal table field called "work" with a value of 0 and it should be a value of 6.
    Thanks! 
    Scott

  • Field not ready for input

    Hi All,
    I am trying to upload few materials using 'MATERIAL_MAINTAIN_DARK' FM.
    But I am getting few warning messages as shown below.
    The field MBEW-VJVPR is not ready for input and was therefore not transferred
    The field MBEW-VMVPR is not ready for input and was therefore not transferred
    The field MBEW-ZPLP1 is not ready for input and was therefore not initialized
    Can someone please let me know the reason for the above warning messages?
    Thanks and Regards,
    Sachin M M

    Please check thru MM01 whether these fields are display only or can be input enabled ?

  • Migo: field not ready for input

    hello  ,
    i am stuck with an issue , which is ---
      I have to add two fields in migo tablecontrol with dyndr- 200, for overdelivery tolerance and under delivery tolerance.
    I am able to add them with my custom fields (ZZUEBTO,ZZUNTTO). and now fields are their in table control .
    But now the issue , when i am initializing values to these fields using badi MB_MIGO_BADI ,and method LINE_MODIFY,
    its showing warning that --
    BAdI: Field GOITEM-ZZUEBTO not ready to accept input (Change will not be adopted)
    Message no. MIGO050
    Diagnosis
    The contents of field GOITEM-ZZUEBTO have been changed in BAdI MB_MIGO_BADI (method LINE_MODIFY). The field, however, is not ready for input, so the change cannot be copied.
    In method  LINE_MODIFY, only the contents of fields that are ready for input can be changed.
    if any one , please revert me back .
    Thanx,
    Jeetendra Chauhan
    Edited by: jeet.chauhan on Jun 2, 2011 7:58 AM

    Hi
    If I understand you, you are modifing the standard dynpro SAPLMIGO 0200 (ie: the table control TV_GOITEM). I suggest you to avoid it and mantain these fields in a new tab with this BADI and methods PBO_DETAIL and PAI_DETAIL.
    Regards
    Eduardo

  • Where is the "not ready for input" field stored in SAP?

    Hi,
    In the tcode CT04, the 'Additional Data' tab has a field called 'not ready for input'. I want to find this value in a table. I thought it was in CABN-ATINP but this does not seem to be populated all the time.
    e.g.
    1. characteristic ABCDE has the value checked in CT04 but there is no entry in CABN-ATINP
    2. characteristic ZYXWV has the value checked in CT04 and there is an entry in CABN-ATINP
    Does anyone know:
    a) why?
    b) how to find the value for point 1 above?
    Thanks,
    Kroc.

    obviously, that is wrong.
    It is true that the ATINP value for batches which have a reference field in CT04 does not ever change but having a reference field does not necessarily mean that it should be display mode.
    Anyone know why the reference field stops the ATINP field update?
    And how does the program know that it should be 'not ready for input' when the ATINP flag is not changed?
    Thanks.

  • Mark field is Sales Order as "not ready for Input"

    Hi there!
    I would like to mark a field in a sales order as "not ready for input"  i.e greyed out...would any one happen to know where I can control that?  The exact field is screen field: VBKD-KURSK.
    Thanks in advance
    Elizabeth

    hi,
    check out these link.
    VBAP-KTGRM and VA02??
    <a href="http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/CAGTFADMLO/CAGTFADMLO.pdf.">http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/CAGTFADMLO/CAGTFADMLO.pdf.</a>
    <a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/c1/6484d4c25411d1a5250060087d1f3b/content.htm">http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/c1/6484d4c25411d1a5250060087d1f3b/content.htm</a>
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/1984%3Fpage%3Dlast%26x-order%3Ddate">https [original link is broken] [original link is broken]
    regs,
    jaga

  • Mark  field in Sales Order as 'not ready for input'

    Hi there!
    I'd like to mark a field in the sales order as not ready for input. I need to refresh my memory on how this is done!  The particular field is screen field: VBKD-KURSK.
    Many thanks in advance
    Elizabeth

    Hi Elizabeth,
    you could use a transaction variant (SHD0). Maybe ther e is another easier solution...
    Regards
    Elmar

  • Interactive form within WebDynpro not ready for input

    Hi,
    After building a simple interactive form with the form builder, I want to fill in the fields in the adobe form. The form is included in a ABAP web dynpro application as Interactive form and the enabled property is checked. But the form fields are still read only and not ready for input.
    The interactive form uses ZCI layout and an ABAP dictionary based interface. The menu item include scripting was hit and I can not fill in the fields. Instead I only see read only fields. When previewing the form in the forms designer, the fields are open.
    Please assist.
    Regards
    Ravikumar

    hi Ravikumar,
    The following code fragment shows how this input readiness can be set up:
    method WDDOMODIFYVIEW.
    data: LR_INTERACTIVE_FORM type ref to CL_WD_INTERACTIVE_FORM,
    LR_METHOD_HANDLER type ref to IF_WD_IACTIVE_FORM_METHOD_HNDL.
    check first_time = abap_true.
    LR_INTERACTIVE_FORM ?= VIEW->GET_ELEMENT(u2018INTERACTIVE_FORM_1u2019).
    LR_METHOD_HANDLER ?= LR_INTERACTIVE_FORM->_METHOD_HANDLER.
    LR_METHOD_HANDLER->SET_LEGACY_EDITING_ENABLED( abap_true ).
    endmethod.
    Hope this helps.

  • Input ready query - not ready for input

    I have created the following in IP:
    1. A multiprovider based on an actuals cube (Standard infocube) and a plan cube (realtime - data can be planned not loaded).
    2. An Aggregation level on the multiprovider - containing infoobjects: 0version, employee, WBS element, infoprovider, fiscal year, fiscal year variant, 0currency and 0amount.
    3. A filter on the following infoobjects: employee (=123456), wbs element(XX.XX.XXX.X), version (variable - mandatory; ready for input), fiscal year(2008) and fiscal year variant(XX).
    4. A planning function to copy from version 0 (actual) to version 866 (random Value - Master data exists).
    I have created a query on the multiprovider and set the query properties correctly. I have also created two restricted key figures as follows:
    1. Actual (Restricted by infoprovider = actual; version = 0; fy = 2007; fyvar = XX)
    2. Plan   (Restricted by infoprovider = plan  ; version = input-ready variable; fy = 2008; fyvar = XX)
    I have used all the infoobjects in the agg. level in the query. I am using the same version number (866) on the query selection screen as defined in the filter.
    When I run the query, I can see only the actuals line. The plan keyfigure is not ready for input (although keyfigure properties are set to "Data can be changed using user entries or planning functions).   
    What am I doing wrong which is preventing the plan keyfigure from opening up for planning?
    I have also tried to create an agg. level on the plan infocube with similar settings as above. When I run the query, I get a no data found result - which I think is right because there is no data in the planning cube.
    PS: When I use the wizard in the planning modeler the keyfigure (0amount) can be changed.

    Hi Avya,
    Use a filter on the 0currency, for a particular currency type. (if problem is: currency type keyfigures are not input ready)
    This will mak it input ready.
    **Reward Points for useful answers**
    Regards,
    Naveenan

  • Data Entry Layouts - Rows not ready for inputs - Multiple records

    Hi,
    I have created a simple layout using a predefined simple structure for rows (FS Items) and a data driven one for columns (for the period value in LC).
    Some cells show some data in them and are not available for input because there are multiple transaction records behind the numbers.
    The transaction records share the same breakdowns except for the Currency Translation Indicator (it is empty for original records and shows '1' for records created during currency translation) and the currency key for transaction currency (sometimes it is empty).
    It would be much appreciated if you let me know a way to introduce new data with layouts for FS Items (accounts) which already have transaction records.

    Hi Roberto,
    Data may not be ready for input because of different reasons. The most I met were - you didn't expand the rows structure until the leaves (not nodes) or you marked the column as display only.

  • Newly Appended rows are not ready for input in ALV Grid

    Hi,
    I created a ALV Grid using OO ALV ,
    I made a condition for editable rows and I have succeded in it.
    in the applicaton tool bar of the ALV I have  the  ADD and DELETE rows Buttons.
    When I click on the Add row button I am having it Disabled for Input.
    But I want the whole line Enabled for Input
    How to get that
    Regards

    "data Declarations
    TYPES: BEGIN OF ty_sto.
            INCLUDE STRUCTURE zarp_sto.
    TYPES: celltab TYPE lvc_t_styl,
          END OF ty_sto.
    DATA:it_sto TYPE TABLE OF ty_sto,
         wa_sto TYPE ty_sto,
         alv_grid  TYPE REF TO cl_gui_alv_grid,
         container TYPE REF TO cl_gui_custom_container,
         it_fieldcat TYPE lvc_t_fcat,
         wa_layout   TYPE lvc_s_layo.
    CALL SCREEN 100.
    MODULE status_0100 OUTPUT.
      SET PF-STATUS 'STATUS'.
      IF container IS INITIAL.
        CREATE OBJECT container
          EXPORTING
            container_name = 'CONTROL'.
        CREATE OBJECT alv_grid
          EXPORTING
            i_parent = container.
      ENDIF.
      PERFORM fetch_data.
      PERFORM fill_fieldcat.
      wa_layout-stylefname = 'CELLTAB'.
      CALL METHOD alv_grid->set_table_for_first_display
        EXPORTING
           is_layout                     = wa_layout
        CHANGING
          it_outtab                     = it_sto
          it_fieldcatalog               = it_fieldcat.
      CALL METHOD alv_grid->set_ready_for_input
       EXPORTING
        i_ready_for_input = 1
    ENDMODULE.                 " STATUS_0100  OUTPUT
    MODULE user_command_0100 INPUT.
      CASE sy-ucomm.
        WHEN 'BACK'.
          LEAVE PROGRAM.
      ENDCASE.
    ENDMODULE.                 " USER_COMMAND_0100  INPUT
    Data Fetch and Filling Field cat
    FORM fetch_data .
      DATA: lt_sto TYPE TABLE OF zarp_sto,
            ls_sto TYPE zarp_sto.
      SELECT *
        FROM zarp_sto
        INTO TABLE lt_sto.
      LOOP AT lt_sto INTO ls_sto .
        PERFORM fill_cell_tab USING ls_sto
                              CHANGING wa_sto.
        MOVE-CORRESPONDING ls_sto TO wa_sto.
        APPEND wa_sto TO it_sto.
      ENDLOOP.
    ENDFORM.                  
    FORM fill_cell_tab USING ls_sto    TYPE zarp_sto
                       CHANGING wa_sto TYPE ty_sto .
      DATA: l_mode     TYPE raw4,
            ls_celltab TYPE lvc_s_styl.
      IF ls_sto-manual_entry IS INITIAL.
        l_mode = cl_gui_alv_grid=>mc_style_disabled.
      ELSE.
        l_mode = cl_gui_alv_grid=>mc_style_enabled.
      ENDIF.
      ls_celltab-fieldname = 'CONTRIBUTION'.
      ls_celltab-style     = l_mode.
      INSERT ls_celltab INTO TABLE wa_sto-celltab.
      ls_celltab-fieldname = 'TOT_CONTRIBUTION'.
      ls_celltab-style     = l_mode.
      INSERT ls_celltab INTO TABLE wa_sto-celltab.
      ls_celltab-fieldname = 'AVG_CONTRIBUTION'.
      ls_celltab-style     = l_mode.
      INSERT ls_celltab INTO TABLE wa_sto-celltab.
    ENDFORM.                 
    FORM fill_fieldcat .
      DATA: ls_fieldcat TYPE lvc_s_fcat.
      CALL FUNCTION 'LVC_FIELDCATALOG_MERGE'
        EXPORTING
          i_structure_name             = 'ZARP_STO'
        CHANGING
          ct_fieldcat                  = it_fieldcat.
      LOOP AT it_fieldcat INTO ls_fieldcat .
        IF ls_fieldcat-fieldname = 'CONTRIBUTION' OR
           ls_fieldcat-fieldname = 'TOT_CONTRIBUTION' OR
           ls_fieldcat-fieldname = 'AVG_CONTRIBUTION'.
          ls_fieldcat-edit = 'X'.
          ls_fieldcat-checktable = '!'.
        ELSE.
          ls_fieldcat-auto_value = 'X'.
          ls_fieldcat-checktable = '!'.
        ENDIF.
        MODIFY it_fieldcat FROM ls_fieldcat .
      ENDLOOP.
    ENDFORM.             
    Please help in this issue
    Edited by: SAP LEARNER on Dec 17, 2009 7:32 AM

  • How to define on cell-level: ready for input or not?

    Hello,
    we would like to define on each cell of a table if it's ready for input or not.
    Not only rows or columns should be marked as input-ready but single cells.
    E.g. The user should be able to say A2 is ready for input, B3 ist not.
    Thank you,
    Daniel

    Hi Daniel,
    I can not imagine such a function.
    What is possible, is that you define the data slices according to what you want to be able to enter. so if you include several char with certain values in your data slices, your mask in the end will have the look, that certail cells are not ready for input.
    Unfortunatly you can not set data slices on key figures, so maybe you need an account model.
    regards
    Cornelia

  • Hidden variable but ready for Input - BEx

    Hello everyone,
    I wanted to know if it's possible to create a variable for selection screen in the BEx which is hidden but still ready for input.
    I guess that if I uncheck the option "Variable is Ready for Input" in the variable properties in BEx, I will have a variable which is hidden and can be manipulated in a SAP Exit function module. I don't want to manipulate the variable there but send a value through RRI to this report (where the Variable should be hidden). If I uncheck the option "Variable is Ready for Input" I cannot set this in the RRI settings because I don't see the variable since it is not ready for input
    Do you know a possible solution for this?
    Thanks,
    Carlos

    Hello Bob,
    Thanks for your fast answer. I got what you said, but it is not as simple as it is, for that reason I will describe the scenario a little bit more:
    Source query has:
    Variable: Key Date (Single, mandatory) -> InfoObject /APC/ACCTRADAT
    Key date means "all before that date" (defined in the extractor).
    Target query has:
    Variable: Transaction Date (selection Option, optional) -> InfoObject /APC/ACCTRADAT
    Transaction Date means "only that date" or "from one date to other date".
    If I send the date through RRI, the target query will think that the value it is getting is a single value, but it's actually a range (all before that date).
    For that reason I created a new InfoObject called Key Date for Recon. (/APC/RCTKEYDAT) with a single optional variable. I don't want to show the InfoObject as a free char because it makes no sence on it. So, depending on the variable I get, the extractor will decide either if it is a range or a single value. Any ideas?
    Regards,
    Carlos

  • Recon account ready for Input-Not possible to change during MIRO

    Hello
    We are on ECC 6.0
    System does not allow users to change Vendor Recon A/c during invoice verification through MIRO. Recon A/c field is greyed out under Details tab in MIRO.
    Recon Account has been declared as Ready for Input and Alternative Recon A/c has been mapped wrt GL A/c by assigning it an ID.
    However, i am able to change recon A/c during invoice booking through FB60 or F-43 t codes.
    What am i missing?
    Does sytem allow change of Recon A/c in MIRO? If yes, how?
    Thanks.
    Vimal

    Hi, check vendor rec. account for this Company code, then check Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable-Business Transactions-Postings with Alternative Reconciliation Account-Define Alternative Reconciliation Accounts
    If there exists such Defining, so check may be Alternative account just for Aut.posting, or forbided for posting in this Currency

  • MIGO Field display to ready for Input

    Hi,
    Field EBELN purchase order is made mandatory for movement type 541
    When i am doing MB1B its ready for input
    But when i am trying to post 541 using MIGO the field is display only
    I tried Enjoy settings for MIGO but the field is not available in modifiable or influencing node
    Is there any way i can add the field or other workaround solution?
    Thanks
    Diwakar

    Hi Jurgan,
    Thanks for your reply ,
    The requirement here is to track the link between 541 and 542 ,
    The processor PO is updated by user in PO field and also added the vendor field (custom) which is again updated by user
    while doing 541 on saving exit finds out the latest PO number for combination of Vendor and material and updates it in one field
    Hence 541 document always contain the processor PO ,and vendor PO
    Normally client use MB1B for this but , if required MIGO can not be used because of this PO field constrain
    Hope its clear
    Thanks
    Diwakar

Maybe you are looking for