Field recovery in the account's advanced search

Hi all,
i am working with badi CRM_ACC_SEARCH and i need to recover the value entered in field 'last name' , talking about the advanced search of accounts (field group ACC_SEARCH_07, structure CRMT_BSP_SEAREQ_ACCOUNT, model access CL_BSP_ACC_ACCMOD). How can i do it? any module function? thanks in advance.
Best Regards
Gab

Hi GAB.
Which Application are you using ?
Regards.
Armando Rodriguez.

Similar Messages

This is a question about the iTunes Store. I have the correct artist, title, composer, and album name for a song popular in the 1970's. The store's Advanced Search feature can't find any of the information. How can I get Search to find the song I seek?

What can I try if the store's Advanced Search strikes out trying to find the song I want?

Perhaps the song is not available in MP3 format, or isn't available in the iTunes Store, or simply not available in your country. (A Norwegian band's first album from the 1980s became available in MP3 format only in April 2012; an example that not everything is automatically is available in MP3 as soon as possible.)
... and before any wag says, or even thinks "it", yes - the Norwegian band's album is very good! (Still waiting for their second album, from 1982, though!)
You may be surprised at how often a song or album is not available because of "contractual problems" - in other words, someone's being greedy, difficult, or both. (Another album I like, from a UK band of the 70's, was unavailable for a long time because - and I'm quoting the band's leader - "the copyright owner wanted too much money for the album to be on CD.")
You could try looking for the song in other stores. If it's not yet available anyhwere, you'll just have to be patient. You could try contacting the band via any websites they have, and asking them about it's availability. What's the song? Perhaps I (or soemoen else) might be able to confirm it's availability on MP3 from another source.

Hide "search" in EP (the button and Advanced Search link)

Hi,
I need to hide field "search" (where button "Search" and "Advanced Search" link, after portal header).
How to do it or where can I manage this settings?
thanks.

Hi,
If you need to remove the search view from the Portal page then you can do the following.
Go to Content Administration -> Portal Content -> Content Provided by SAP -> End User Content -> Standard Portal Users
In this select the Default Framework page , open it.
Select the Tool Area and click on properties.
In the properties change the value to NO for Enable KM Search & Enable KM Search Advanced properties.
This is the simplest way you can remove the whole search area.
*There is one more way to remove the search *
If you want to remove the whole search, you can achieve this just by changing the com.sap.portal.toolAreaiView property "Enable KM Search". Just set the Property to NO.
If you want to remove only the search Button you have to edit the file "ToolAreaiView.jsp" from the PAR-File com.sap.portal.navigation.toolarea.par. Copy this file under your own namespace, unpack and remove the line:
<td nowrap> <%=searchButtonTextStr%> </td>
from the jsp-file. Redeploy this par file, create a new toolAreaiView based on the portal component in the PAR and integrate this iView in your frameworkpage.
Unfortunately, it's not possible to do this using the Theme Editor.
Regards,
Nikhil

Help required to customize Simple/Advanced Search. Need to add new fields

Hello,
Module: Oracle Sales Online
EBS version: 12.1.3
Jdev version: 10.1.3.3
Scenario:
- We are dealing with standard oracle pages.
- We have TWO "SIMPLE/ADVANCED SEARCH"s available. Each "Simple/Advanced Search" can be found by navigating through paths "A --> B" and "A --> B --> C --> D" . Here it means one "SIMPLE/ADVANCED SEARCH" page is available at page "B" and another "SIMPLE/ADVANCED SEARCH" is available at page "D".
- In the first search page which is at page "B", both Simple as well as Advanced search has a filter field "Win Probability %", of type VARCHAR2/DROPDOWN with values (10, >=10, <=30, 30, >=30, <=50, 50, >=50, <=70, 70, >=70, <=90, 90, 100)
- In second search page, referring to page "D", the Simple search DOESN'T have the "Win Probability %". And the Advanced Search page has the "Win Probability %" but it is of type - NUMBER/MessageTextInput type.
Issue/Requirement:
- The 2nd Simple/Advanced search pages need to have "WIN PROBABILITY %" field and it should be of VARCHAR2/DROPDOWN with values (10, >=10, <=30, 30, >=30, <=50, 50, >=50, <=70, 70, >=70, <=90, 90, 100) just like the way we had in 1st Simple/Advanced search.
Note:
- Again speaking we are dealing with standard oracle pages
- If you go to the "About this Page", interestingly I found:
i. The "message component layout" for both of them is from the same region , i.e., ASNOpptympSrchRN
ii. Rest of the search filters for both the searchs are from common View Object , i.e., OpptySearchVO1 (for Simple search), OpportunityDetailsVO1 (for advanced search)
iii. The "Stack layout" for both the search pages are same, i.e. XXMASOpptyQryCO
iv. None of the fields are rendered to false (everything is set to be rendered TRUE)
Any response is highly appreciated.
Thanks,
Anand
Edited by: 933590 on Jul 19, 2012 8:18 AM

"XXMASOpptyQryCO is the name of stacklayout or CO?
What is the CO?
Does both pages share same CO?
have you already extended the CO "XXMASOpptyQryCO"?
what is the original CO then? I think in that CO it must be written somewhere, simple search "search allowed = false""
-Here CO what you are referring is a controller.
-FYI pages share same controller.
-And the original controller for both the pages are OpptyUwqCO. Right now its extended controller is XXMASOpptyQryCO
Fact is I didn't create this search page. It was built by some third party members. Also that I do not have the original source nor the documentation pertaining to it. So could you inform as in how should I navigate to the point "Search Allowed = True"
I should have informed that at "B" page, it has a region /oracle/apps/asn/opportunity/webui/ASNMgrOpptyQryRN and at page "D", the region is /oracle/apps/asn/opportunity/webui/ASNOpptyQryRN
Edited by: 933590 on Jul 19, 2012 1:37 PM

OAF Page Personalize Page to add a new criteria in Advance Search

Hi All,
I am new to OAF. I need to add a new criteria (Asset Activity) to the Work Order Advance Search page in EAM module.Asset activity field has to pick from the 'Create Work Order' Form. I can able to identify the CO class associated with this field in the 'Create Work Order' form.
How to achieve this by personalizing the Work Order Advance Search Page.
Any help would be much appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
-Mukesh.
Edited by: Mukesh on May 1, 2012 12:48 PM

Hi All,
I have done the following steps.
1. From the Work Order Advanced Search Page, clicked on Personalize "Advanced Search".
2. Created a Criteria Item with ID 'AssetActivityAS' and also created a Message Styled Text under this criteria.
3. Back to the Advanced Search Page, clicked on 'Personalize Page' page in the bottom.
4. Create an Advanced Search Mappings with ID 'AssetActivityMap' and Results Item as 'WorkOrdersVO.AssetActivity' and Search Item as 'AssetActivityAS'.
5. But when I click on Apply, it's throwing the following error.
oracle.apps.fnd.framework.OAException: oracle.adf.mds.exception.MDSRuntimeException: Unable to find component with absolute reference = /oracle/apps/eam/workorder/webui/EAM_EW_START_PAGE.WorkOrdersVO.AssetActivity, XML Path = null. Please verify that the reference is valid and the definition of the component exists either on the File System or in the MDS Repository.
at oracle.apps.fnd.framework.OAException.wrapperException(OAException.java(Compiled Code))
at oracle.apps.fnd.framework.webui.OAWebBeanHelper.processRequest(OAWebBeanHelper.java(Compiled Code))
etc...........
I found WorkOrdersVO(oracle.apps.eam.workorder.server.WorkOrdersVO) from Business Component References Details of About Page: Work Orders.
Am I doing the right steps to add a new search criteria in Advance Search page?
Can anyone help me to resolve this issue?
Thanks in Advance,
-Mukesh

Problem in using quick and advanced search based on transient items

Hi everybody
I want to have an unbound string item in my form and allow users to use advanced search and quick search on that item.
I read the following post About advanced search and added a transient
item on view object and overrode the advance search method in application module and realized that the value of that string was
added to arguments.
Then I decided to add this transient item on entity object instead of view object so that we were able to add the item in one place and
use it in several view objects. I added an item in the entity and unchecked the persistent flag but I can't set queryable flag since it was disable.
I added the item in the view object and by use of application definition I forced the item to be shown in the advance search.
I generate the application and the item was shown correctly in the advanced search but when I set the item in advanced search its value
was not sent to advance search method.
Is it a bug ? (value of the field in the advanced search section was not sent to advanced search method )
Is it a way to add a queryable transient item in the entity object and still benefit from overriding advanced search method ?
I am using Jdeveloper 10.1.3 and Jheadstart 10.1.3.
Any help would be appreciated.
Best Regards
Navid

Navid,
JHeadstart checks whether the attribute definition is queryable before adding it to the list of advanced search attributes. A transient VO attribute can still be set to queryable, for a transient EO attribute this is not possible. We will remove this check on queryability in the upcoming patch release, since you have a valid use case. For now, you can subclass JhsSearchBean and override method createArgumentListForAdvancedSearch and comment out the check for "def.isQueryable()".
Steven Davelaar,
JHeadstart Team.

POWL based Advanced Search

Hi all! I am confused over the below configurations for Advance Search:
Define Object Types for Advanced Search
Define Default POWL Application for Advanced Search
I tried to match the query with the one that I see when I run Advanced Search on the portal but could not see any similarity in the settings. For example, for business object 2201, the default query used is SAPSRM_AL_PURCHASING_03_01. I then run POWL_QUERY to view the layout and selection criteria of this query. However, it does not match the fields I see when I run Advanced search on business 2201 (Purchase Order).
I have also made sure that the user has the role with access to the application id assigned to SAPSRM_AL_PURCHASING_03_01 in the configuration 'Define Default POWL Application for Advanced Search'. The application id is SAPSRM_AS_PO.
Can someone please advise whether I am off the track or that I have missed out anything?
Cheers!
SF

I have digged further and carried out some tests. I think POWL for advanced search is only available with harmonized roles.

Change the format in advanced serach of approver-Leave Request

Hi,
Can we modify the option in advance search window that we get in the Leave Request - approver field.
(ESS- Working time- Leave Request- below we have the differnt required entries to be made.)
Regrds,
Nazeer

Hi Vamshi,
You can change the type of leave shown in the dropdown-box, as well as the sort order of these types.
Go to the IMG, choose Personnel Management - Employee Self-Service - Service-Spesific Settings - Working Time - Leave Request - Processing Processes - Specify Processing Processes for Types of Leave.
Here you can set up the types of leave you require. In the detail view of these types you can specify the sort number, which is the sort order of the dropdown-box.
Regards,
Ellen

Index not appearing among Advanced Search indexes

Hi,
I have created an index but the index is not appearing among a list of other indexes in the Advanced Search page.
My steps for index creation are as below:
1) Go to System Admin > System Config > Knowledge Management > Index Administration.
Click on the Create button
2)
ID      = sponsored_links
Name    = Sponsored Links Index
Group   = No entry
Crawler = standard (and define a schedule as daily)
Parameter
Service        = TREX Search
Items to Index = Documents
I haven't assigned any data source.
(I have also tried entering Name & Value fields as 'searchhidden' and 'true').
Click 'Create Index' button.
3) Next, click on Advanced Search link on the top of the portal.
Click on 'Show Indexes'.
The index I created is not displayed.
Could anyone please let me know what I am doing wrong?
Thanks and regards,
MB

Hi Karsten,
Thank you for your reply.
But i am not very clear regarding the function of Sponsored Links.
I don't have any xml documents in my Sponsored Links folder. Therefore why do I need to include the property searchhidden during index creation so that XMLs are not rendered in the search results?
1) Suppose I have ten indexes. If I search for the keyword (present in the Sponsored Link form) among all the indexes (from Advanced Search), even if one index has an error, the search operation will throw an error mentioning the names of erronous indexes.
In this case I would need to select only non-erronous indexes and then perform the search.
If my index is hidden and not visible among the other indexes, how do I include it in my search?
2) Similarly if I would like to search using this index only, how do i do it? Since this index is hidden i am unable to select only this, for a search.
Is it mandatory to have the searchhideen property? Will the sponsored links functionality not work if this property is missing?
I request you to kindly guide me at your earliest convenience.
Best regards,
Moitreyee

Find Label Missing in Advanced Search For Specific User

for specifi users FIND label is showing but some of the users in advanced search this find label is missing . top of the applictaion it is there
plz let me know why this is problem is coming
find button should visible to all users......................
give me repaly ASAP

Hi
CRM 5.0
its not related to application,modification ..but my problem is the find label is working for some of the users.but some of the users find label is not there,
plz let me know where i have to make corrections for this problem........

A bug in Advanced Search ?

Hi,
In my requirement, I have an EO-based view object which is the view instance of an advanced table, and I provide two submitButtons, 'save button' and 'reset button' on the table which is used to do commit and rollback respectively for the data update.
When user click on 'reset button', getOADBTransaction().rollback() statement in the AM will be executed , then a strange thing happens, the "Add Another" poplist in the advanced search panel will become blank.
Hence I'm wondering transaction.rollback() will cause clearing the VO in the 'Add Another' poplist?
Do I have another way to roll back the change and meanwhile the poplist would not be cleared?
Please help.
Regards,
MZ

Navid,
JHeadstart checks whether the attribute definition is queryable before adding it to the list of advanced search attributes. A transient VO attribute can still be set to queryable, for a transient EO attribute this is not possible. We will remove this check on queryability in the upcoming patch release, since you have a valid use case. For now, you can subclass JhsSearchBean and override method createArgumentListForAdvancedSearch and comment out the check for "def.isQueryable()".
Steven Davelaar,
JHeadstart Team.

Textfields in advanced search from LOV non-editable

I have a LOV where the textfields in advanced search are always non-editable. When I look into the LOV JSP page, maxlength of the textfields is 0.
One of the textfields uses following attribute:
in EntityObject: attribute "Kuerzel", type "String" (database datatype VARCHAR2(10))
in ViewObject: attribute "DspKuerzel"
in the JHeadstart ADF BC Property Editor from EntityObject and ViewObject the Setting "maximum length" of the attribute is not set (no entry). Jheadstart help says that when maximum length is set to 0 then the corresponding textfield is non-editable. But here it is not set. Is there a solution to this problem?

If you send a testcase to [email protected] and rename extension .zip to .zipped we can investigate why the maximum length is not generated correctly in your situation.
Steven Davelaar,
JHeadstart Team.

Adobe Advanced Search Function not woking

The Advanced Search Function has stopped working. I use mac os x 10.6.8. I deleted and reinstalled adobe reader 10.1.2 and still the same problem: nothing appears when I click on the Advanced Search function. I'd welcome suggestions on how to fix this. Thank you.

Did you try the shortcut for Advanced search - option + shift +F. Do you not get the search window even then ?

Future price on the accounting screen in MM02

If a future price and validity date is maintained in field ZKPRS on the accounting view of the material master, what transaction needs to run to activate this future price?
Thanks for your help!

There is a button (5th from left) which says release, click on it. Then enter the same information you entered before.
Hopefully this solves your problem.
-Chandru

Two Advanced Search on a page

Hi
I generated a form that had two editable tables, this have the master-detail structure(in one page). I generated the page with advanced search for master table. I know that only would be one advanced search for page. But, I need that both master and detail have advanced search. How can I make it function ? What post generation changes may I do ?
Thanks in advance
Liceth

Liceth,
This is currently not supported by the JHeadstart runtime code. It is not trivial at all to add support for this, so I cannot give you simple steps to add this functionality.
We will remove this limitation in JDev 10.1.3 release, but that will take a while..
Steven Davelaar,
JHeadstart Team..

Field recovery in the account's advanced search

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for