Field Refkey-3 is required for G/L--error while posting

Hi All
Please suggest for the following.
When I do posting to Accounting after Payroll, I get one error....'Field RefKey 3 is a required field for G/L account 1000 107020'.
I have to inform FI every month & they in return change some settings for this. Then it works fine.
The reason we are getting this error was explained by FI, but we are trying to find out some solution as this setting can not be handed over to Super Users when Consultants leave the project.
FI reply on this-----'Reference Key-For employee advances, We did Reference key as mandatory field. So while entering transactions against Employee advance GL accounts in FI, we are entering employee number in Reference key field because it is a mandatory field. When we are processing against employee advances in HR payroll, this field is mandatory. So we have to change the settings means we changed that field as optional then we are running the payroll. Instead of moving one request for this setting, We have to post directly in Payroll with out filling up that field.If there is any way to fill some constant in that field while running payroll please guide us.'
Please suggest if there is any way to achieve the desired result.
Thanks & Regards

Garry
Instead of Ref Key in FI, there is a field for Personnel Number to enter while making transactions.
We can post to GL Employee Number wise using Characteristic type of Symbolic Account to Q,
this mean, Employee Number will be displayed in GL fin Personnel Number field.
So, ask Finance Team, instead of making Ref Key as mandatory, use Personnel Number field.
So, when you post entries from HR, the results will be posted without any issues.
But, make sure the entries from HR should always be Credit for this, for Dr. entries no Personnel Number will be displayed.
Regards
...Sadhu

Similar Messages

  • No control line for line item - error while posting bd to accounting

    Hi all,
    Billing document showing err "no control line for line item" while posting to accounting doc.Sales document is complete no in completion logs.
    Previous errr: g/l missing for line item" in order incompletion after maintaining company code for customer, then refresh the g/l missing for line item is no more logs and showing the error "no control line for line item" while posting bd to accts.
    Please help
    Regards
    anush

    Hello Anush,
    if the company data of the payer was not created when the sales order has been created, then the system could not create the correct records in table VBREVK. Once the company data has been maintained the VBREVK records could be corrected by re-saving the sales, but only if no billing document exists.
    In your case you already created the billing document.
    Please try these step:
    1. reverse billing document
    2. run VA02 add a blank char to PO number, save
    3. create new billing document
    Best regards,
    Ivano.

  • Error while posting a write up for asset belonging to affiliated company

    Hi,
    I am facing an error while posting a write up for an asset which belong to an affiliated company. Error is
    Transaction type 790 not possible (posting to affiliated company)
    Message no. AA390
    I am using Transaction type 711 which is linked to 790 in custo. Kinldy let me know how to resolve this issue.
    Thanks
    Pragya

    Hi
    According to this note for document type used, we should not select the 'inter company posting' or 'enter trading partner indicator'
    but as i m doing writeup for asset belonging to affiliated company, so i need to set this indicator. the document type used is standard AA
    Is there any other way, to resolve the issue
    Thanks
    Pragya

  • Error while posting Idoc for customer invoice.

    hi,
    I m posting Customer Invoice through LSMW using IDocs.
    Basic type is FIDCCP02 and message is FIDCC2.
    While posting the Idoc I m getting error as:
    'Document or line item does not exist for invoice reference'.
    I m not getting the error why it is asking for invoice reference because
    in FB01 it is not asking for any reference or anything.
    In Idoc all the item level values are coming prorperly.
    If anybody worked on such issues then please reply.
    -Thanx.
    -Umesh

    Hi Umesh,
    Try posting customer invoice through TCode - F-22. There it may be asking for reference number. Generally we post customer invoice by F-22 not from FB01.
    If you are getting error you can add reference field in your LSMW it may be mandatory in F-22.
    Ashven

  • Error while posting the IDoc for Customer Invoice.

    hi,
    I m posting Customer Invoice through LSMW using IDocs.
    Basic type is FIDCCP02 and message is FIDCC2.
    While posting the Idoc I m getting error as:
    'Document or line item does not exist for invoice reference'.
    I m not getting the error why it is asking for invoice reference because
    in FB01 it is not asking for any reference or anything.
    Even in f-22 also it is not asking for the same.
    In Idoc all the item level values are coming prorperly.
    If anybody worked on such issues then please reply.
    -Thanx.
    -Umesh

    Hi,
    Where you able to resolve your issue, I would appreciate if you can share the solution.
    Thanks

  • Error while posting Invoice IDOC (The difference is too large for clearing)

    Hi All,
    While posting Invoice IDOC to Remittance Advice IDOC get fails with status 51 &  message ' The difference is too large for clearing'.
    Please suggest any solution or reason to fail IDOC.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Ajay
    Moderator message: please search for information and try to find out yourself before asking, this will be a functional problem anyway that should be asked in the appropriate forum, e.g. ERP Financials.
    locked by: Thomas Zloch on Aug 20, 2010 1:59 PM

    Pls check the tolerance amounts limits:
    SPRO--- F/A --AR/AP -
    Business transactions -Open item clearing--- Clearing differance---- Define / Assign tolerance groups for emp -
    Where you need to change the limits of max amounts with the %
    Let me know for any info.
    Regards
    Suresh

  • Error while posting Goods issue for the reservation

    Hi,
    I am getting an error while trying to post the Goods Isuue for the reservation using MIGO transaction. The error is 'Level AR belongs to cash position (source symbol PSK)'.
    Please help me in solving this if anyone has any idea, let me know what am I supposed to do.
    Regards,
    Lavanya.

    Hi
    I think Cash Management (TR-CM) module implemented in your system.Please post this in Finance forum.
    Regards
    Ramakrishna

  • Cash Management Error while posting GI for the reservation

    Hi,
    I am getting an error while trying to post the Goods Isuue for the reservation using MIGO transaction. The error is 'Level AR belongs to cash position (source symbol PSK)'.
    Please help me in solving this if anyone has any idea, let me know what am I supposed to do.
    Regards,
    Lavanya.

    go to VL02n, select the delivery#,enter & Change manually the Actual GI date to current date & press post goods issue(PGI).
    Hope this would resolve your problem.

  • Error while posting GR with MvT 835 for Brazil Plant using transaction MBSU

    Hi,
    While posting GR with MvT 835 through transaction MBSU with reference to GI document, we are receiving below error :-
    Balance not zero: **** - debit: ****
    credit: ****
    Message No.: M7050.
    We are using TAXBRA procedure for Brazil.
    We request you to please let us know what all configuration do we need to check.
    Regards,
    Kiran

    Answered.

  • Error while posting GR for subcontracting process

    Dear Friends,
    while creating a GR for a subcontracting PO, I get the following error. please suggest what to do. i checked the configuration for the movement type and could not come up with the solution.
    Fld selectn for mvmt type 543 / acct 7449990 differs for Vendor goods movement (014)
    Message no. M7093
    Diagnosis
    Comparison of the field selection strings from movement type 543 and G/L account 7449990 has revealed that there is an incompatible field selection combination at one or more points.
    Field for which the field selection is different: Vendor goods movement
    Example
    On the movement type screen, a given field is a mandatory-entry field, whereas on the G/L account screen, the same field is suppressed.
    System Response
    You cannot post this transaction, unless you have changed the field selection adequately.
    Procedure
    Contact your system administrator.
    Action to be taken by the system administrator
    Check whether any postings resulting from this movement type are to be made to the G/L account determined automatically. If you find that the G/L account is not correct, check the automatic account determination in the Customizing system for valuation.
    Proceed
    If the G/L account is correct, use the report RM07CUFA to compare the field selection for the movement type with the field selection for the G/L account and change the incorrect settings or the field status group of the G/L account.
    Proceed

    The field is mandatory in acct 7449990 and hidden in movement type 543 or vice versa.  To check the field status for that movement type, you can run the program RM07CUFA
    Once you execute this program and found that the field is set to mandatory, then it should be mandatory for that movement type field status also.
    Alternatively, Go to txn OMJJ, click on Movement Type and execute.  There double click on "Field selection (Enjoy) and see whether the movement is maintained as Required Entry or Optional Entry.
    Now go to FS00, input the G/L Account 7449990 and execute.  There go to tab Create/bank/interest and chech whether you have maintained any value against "Field status group" and also you have checked the box for "Post automatically only".
    This should be done in consultation with FI people only if the issue is in production client.
    thanks
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • Separate clearing document for each invoice wise while posting F-36

    Dear Experts
    I am posting F-36 Bills of exchange transaction for invoices. I am receiving one BOE for multiple invoices.
    Requirement is while saving document system should give separate clearing document for each invoice wise.
    Pls guide me
    Thanks in advance
    Sneha

    Hi,
    It is not for dunning.
    The F1 text for your understanding.
    Key for Payment Grouping
    Definition
    The grouping key represents a rule according to which the open items of the account are to be grouped together for payment.
    Use
    The grouping key is used in cases where you do not want all the open items of a customer or a vendor to be paid together but rather you want only those items which belong together to be grouped into a single payment. A maximum of three fields from the open items are defined for every grouping key; the contents of these fields must correspond in order that the open items can be paid together.
    Examples
    If you use loan management, you can define as a rule that only items with same loan number can be collected together by debit memo.
    Regards,
    Ravi

  • Error While Posting MIGO for a Suncontracting PO ..

    Hi All
    I have created a Subcontracting PO and then transffered the material to subcon vendor's stock. now while doing MIGO for the same PO i am getting error as :
    "Account determination for entry EKCA FRN not possible"
    Please let me know why this error is coming?
    Anjan

    Hi Pradeep
    Thanks for your reply. I knew that G/L account entry in OBYC under FRN key is required but my concern is few days back I was doing MIGO successfully though same sttings were there that time also. Could please point put if any other thing is missing.
    Second would like to know how system is identifying FRN key?
    Anjan

  • Error while posting confirmation for limit PO

    Hi Experts,
    we are having a standalone scenario(SRM 7) and the issue is as mentioned below
    The situation is that the PO is a limit order with 2 line items. The first line item is complete and has been closed off with the u201Cno further confirmation/invoiceu201D indicators selected. However the 2nd line still has some limit remaining but the when the central confirmations attempts to enter a good receipt against the line they get an error message which is "No Confirmation could be entered for purchase order"
    please guide me how to solve this.
    regards
    smita

    Hi,
    please find furhte information.
    a limit sc is created for a value of 37000 GBP and after approval it created a PO. but the user went and added a line item directly in PO for 40000 GBP. Now the total value of SC is 77000 GBP.
    user has created a confirmation for 36000GBP and selected no confirmation required further.there is no issues with this lin item
    but with the second line item he posted confimation for value 37000 gbp and invoiced for 30000 GBP.
    when i am trying to post confirmation for 3000 GBP system is throwing an error that "no confirmation could be entered for purchase order"
    could any one guide me how to solve this or any suggestions for solving this.
    regards
    smita

  • Error while posting the ID for Validation

    Hello Experts,
                 We are running a report from a ECC 6.0 server which connects to the PI server via RFC connection defined through RFC Adapter on the PI server. This Pi server then connects to the web server for validation and then returns the status as true or false. But while executing the report on the ECC 6.0 server we are getting the error as " Sender Agreement not found:lookup of binding via CPA-cache failed for Adapter type RFC, AdapterNS http://sap.com/xi/XI/Sy". The connection test for the RFC from the ECC 6.0 server is fine and okay.
    When we get this error we keep trying to validate the ID twicw and third time the transaction happens sucessfully. How do we overcome this error? While creating the communication channel for this scenario on the PI server the * has been removed from the Party field as suggested in one of the blogs in this forum. But in our case the problem still persists even after removing the * in the party field in the Communication channel of the scenario. Kindly suggest the remedy for this problem.
    Thanks
    Best Regards
    PI team

    Hi,
        You could have an issue because the RFC definition has changed and the cache is out-of-synch
    1) Reimport and activate the RFC.
    2) Restart the RFC Adapter service in the Visual Administrator. This will flush the metadata cache in case the RFC has changed.
    If this doesn't work, verify that your Sender Agreement is setup correctly
    1) A common mistake is to create a Message Interface in the IR (Design) for RFC and IDoc senders and point the sender agreement to this Message Interface which won't work. The Sender Agreement should be setup as follows:
    Service: SAP Business System
    Interface: RFC name
    Namespace: urn:sap-com:document:sap:rfc:functions
    please go through below threads,
    senderAgreement not found - PLEASE read
    Error: Sender agreement not found, lookup of binding via CPA-CACHE failed.
    regards,
    ganesh.

  • ERROR WHILE POSTING MIRO FOR MULTIPLE ACCOUNT ASSIGNMENT (ASSET)

    Hi Guys,
    We created  a PO for asset with multiple account assignment. And we immediately do IR instead of GR.
    While doing IR it is giving error
    1) Quantity delivered is zero - Warning message
    2) Account 245350 requires a Transaction Type or is Invalid - Error message
    what may be the problem. how can we eliminate and post it
    Regards
    palani

    Hi,
    I would assume the G/L account you used was not properly set up.  Did you get the same problem if you try to change to another G/L account?  Perhaps, get your FI specialist to look into this G/L account-related error and verify it.
    Cheers,
    HT

Maybe you are looking for